Nuke Iran

Joe emails:

I have to laugh at the new linkage to get the Palestinians their own state, namely the idea that only if Israel offers that up will the moderate arab states unite against Iran and its nuclear program.

There is so much silliness about this that it actually makes sense. It will not work, but I get it.

First, linkage in general is not a real workable way of doing business. Kids do not eat their broccoli so they can get an Xbox. They get the Xbox anyways. They will eat their broccoli if they are hungry.

The US used to make it a point to link the USSR’s human rights to concessions on arms control. In fact, it was the modus operandi at every summit that the first item on the agenda was human rights, which lasted about 10 minutes. Then came round the clock arms negotiations. The linkage was a joke – the US never really pressed human rights until the USSR begged to be pressed. US Presidents wanted arms control for their own political benefit and out of a sense of decency to those in the gulag, they tried to link human rights. But the fact is that you can count on one set of hands the number of people released from the gulag. When the USSR wanted to collapse, it fell head over heels to allow jews to leave and close the gulag, something that it remarkably never did so long as there was this linkage. Israel will give the Palestinians a state on Israel’s own terms or when it is unavoidable. (Note to the Palestinians – if you want a state on the west bank, limit your terror to those areas because bombing discos in tel aviv is just not as cool as it seems on al jazeera – you bomb israeli settlements and you would have Jewish hollywood giving you funding for a reality show).

Second, linkage works when you have leverage. Sadam linked his retreat from Kuwait to Israel’s retreat from the territories. That demand got him so much street cred in the arab world that he could not have done better than if he thrown his shoes at the world trade center. His plan actually worked to some degree. Of course, Saddam got his ass kicked first, and then Israel had to start serious negotiations. But Saddam had something to give, namely, voluntarily getting his ass kicked and not using chemical weapons, and then Israel got the screws to it. Saddam got street cred as the only person to ever land a missile in tel aviv and an extra 10 years on the throne.

So, now, the moderate arabs, who realize the danger that a free Iraq bankrolled by the US poses to their monarchies, desperately want to be seen as sticking it to Israel. Only problem is that the arab armies could probably not take over a beachside cabana in eilat. Only hizbollah seems to have any ability against the Israelis and the 2006 war shut them down for a decade (they will be back, but do not let the western media fool you, the 2006 was a draw but the kill ratio was very much in Israel’s favor and Hizbollah won’t engage in another adventure under present leadership).

But, the arabs know that the Israelis fear (well, more like the Israeli Prime Minister needs a victory against) Iran and these moderate Arabs have finally discovered the mason jar in which their balls are located. They believe their ability to pressure Iran is so important to Israel that Netanyahu, who is very clear that he will not be alive to see a palestinian state, will somehow rush to sign an agreement to get some dirtbag arabs to pressure Iran.

Not going to happen. They are the wrong ass to be kissing.

HOWEVER, the correct ass for Israel to kiss, and what it is very good at, is Washington. Obama clearly cannot tolerate an Israeli attack against Iran – not because of what it will trigger – the Iranians won’t do anything, but how it will affect his world view. He does not want to go on with Israel dictating the game. It went on under Bush, and Bush is bad. What Obama wants is Israel to play nice with everyone, because that is change. Israel, back to square one, is actually willing to play nice with everyone, if everyone agrees to play nice. A normalization of relations with the arab states, a stoppage of Iran’s nuclear program, and maybe a few billion dollars to Israel, and guess what, you may just get a palestinian state of semi-autonomy.

So, what you have is the Arabs being told by Obama, link the palestinian state with Iran, and this way I can use my leverage with Israel to get to my solution, which involves kumbaya around a bonfire with gefilte fish, pita, hummus and a nice rose garden ceremony.

The only problem is that Israel does not care to be f-ed with right now. The right wing in Israel has planned an attack against Iran since Obama was still teaching blacks how to qualify for welfare in south Chicago. Linkage will not work because Obama cannot right all the world’s wrongs and Israel has never planned a military exercise it did not carry out. Obama is viewed in Israel, quite correctly, as completely unsuited for the job.

So, it will be fun to watch Obama try to school Netanyahu, but the facts are these – Israel will destroy Iran’s nuclear reactor, there will be no Palestinian state for the next 10 years, and Obama will stop trying to win foreign affairs battles once his problems at home become more serious.

Posted in Barack Obama, Iran, Israel | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Nuke Iran

Romantic Gestures

Jane writes: "What are your thoughts on dating literary fans? Believe it or not, I have a couple. They are attractive and they come over and thumb through my writing, read it out loud and tell me I’m amazing. I’m wondering….why not exclusively date fans instead of chasing after these "unavailable" men. Why pass up being adored for some un conceivable challenge? Your thoughts?"

"Would you refuse a romantic gesture if you didn’t fancy the taste of something? The person giving it to you is someone you are dating."

Luke: If I loved the person less than I hated the food, I’d refuse.

Jane writes: Yeah, I have a canoli situation. Pretty funny… I’m officially turned off and may never talk to this guy again, over a canoli refusal. He’s obviously not a fan! And this is what you deal with with you date non-fans.

Luke: Fans become just as difficult because no "fan" you date is going to remain a fan…

Posted in Dating | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Romantic Gestures

Do Rabbis Avi Weiss, Saul Berman Deserve To Be Called ‘Amalek’?

Yehuda posts to Hirhurim: Gil, it’s lovely you’re so tolerant. I’m glad you know what they mean.

Despite your tolerance, I think anyone calling you, Rabbis Weiss or Berman, or any other Torah opinions "Amalek" deserves a public rebuke, and should be forced to make a public apology if he wants to continue in his present position. Even if some people consider him the posek ha-dor.

What made YU so great in my day was the mutual respect of future Torah scholars in the beit midrash, even when they had highly divergent views. There were nevertheless roshei yeshivah who said severe things they shouldn’t have and they were never censured, but at least they didn’t control the yeshivah (and that fact left room for everyone). Someone much greater than they was at the top.

Today they do control the yeshivah. That is sad. Thank God for YCT.

ANON POSTS: [Rabbi Dovid Cohen] is a chareidi rabbi from Flatbush and is on the Vaad haposkim of the RCA. His radical statemennts on ethical matters are described above and he has said them in public. he is also well known to have publicly humiliated the Rav ztl and to be proud of it.

LAWRENCE KAPLAN POSTS: I think that Rabbi David Cohen should not be on the Vaad HaPoskim because of his publicly expressed (un)ethical views. But as for his notorious outburst at the Rav’s hesped for his uncle, that is a red herring. I listened to the tape of R. Cohen discussing this, and while he still feels that the Rav had insulted the Hazon Ish and he was right in being upset, he also says that he did not intend to make a public scene, but got carried away.

MODERN ORTHODOX POSTS: I’m very impressed that the RCA acted so quickly, in resolution no. 3 against "any sort of public statement which might be taken to detract from the reputation of others," to dissociate itself from R. Lamm’s recent call to say kaddish on the non-Orthodox movements.

Y. AHARON POSTS: It’s a general observation that influential organizations which operate in the dark will inevitably get involved in corrupt practices. The more money that such an organization makes and the more dominant it is in that money-making area, the greater the temptation to abuse its role. The OU is clearly dominant in the kashrut field and makes many millions in providing its certification. An accounting of such income and how that money is dispensed is long overdue. It’s not as if the OU were a privately held company. It seeks and gets contributions from the Orthodox public. It is also listed as a non-profit organization.

Now that the rabbinic arm of the OU has come out for cost-saving and the rescue of day-schools in these difficult economic times, the parent organization is a good place to start. How much, if anything, do they contribute to day schools? Why shouldn’t a certain percentage of their income go towards helping insure a viable Orthodoxy?

Posted in Modern Orthodox, Orthodox Union, Orthodoxy, YCT, Yeshiva University | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Do Rabbis Avi Weiss, Saul Berman Deserve To Be Called ‘Amalek’?

Redefining Marriage

Rabbi Gil Student blogs: "R. Yair Hoffman explains his opposition to the redefinition of marriage (link). If you ask me, I’d say that we should make civil unions that have all the rights of marriage but not the name, so that we end all discrimination but allow for traditional definitions."

Shmuel posts: "The radicals will not be satisfied with civil unions unless marriage is abolished other than as a religious institution exclusively."

MBG posts: the linked article is very simplistic and seems to jump into this debate without knowing much about it, and therefore without anticipating any counteraguments.

for example:

*what scientific research is he referring to?
*even assuming "proof" that children raised by heterosexual married couples are more "normal" than all others, does it address whether children of gay couples will be better or worse off if their parents are married vs. just living together?

*completely ignoring that our idea of "marriage" (romantic love, no fault divorce, etc) is hardly millenia old. i mean, one could perhaps argue that _this_ (same sex marriage) is really the change that finally will destroy marriage, but one has to at least be aware that people have asserted that about basically every other change in recent memory.

also, the nuremberg reference struck me as a not so subtle gays = nazis fearmongering tactic without much substance behind it.

CHANOKH POSTS: Why should there even be civil unions or non-religious marriages? Isn’t that discriminatory to singles, non-committing people, or people in love relationships involving more than two people? Why should the State be involved in who does what with whom in the privacy of their home?

SHMUEL POSTS: Perhaps the whole idea of marriage and union should be separated from a legal partnership. Every individual would have the right to enter into an exclusive contract with another person who would be entitled to a particular set of legal considerations such as inheritance upon death, decreasing tax liability, and right to shared health insurance. This would be a legal business relationship not predicated upon gender or living arrangements.

SHUA POSTS: In the lands of our diaspora we Jews are merely sojourners, temporary guests (whether wanted by our host countries or not) who are bidden to remain loyal to Torah and apart from any aspect of the secular/gentile lifestyle which is not consonant with Torah.

It follows that the languages that we speak in the diaspora are borrowed for practical purposes only. The English language word "marriage" (and for that matter "divorce") reflects neither any law, custom or ‘meaning’ in Lashon HaKodeh, the language of Torah. And Torah alone reflects for us what is ’emes’ and therefore what is ‘reality.’

"Kiddushin" defines for us the concept of the union of an "ish" with an "isha". Any other word, reflecting any other concept in any other language or culture is simply a non- reality and is therefore irrelevant to us.

That we bother to register for a marriage certificate at town hall is merely a legal practicality. They could call it "wptgigajkep" for all we care. What difference does it make? And so I just don’t understand the fuss over mamesh, nothing.

Posted in Hirhurim, Marriage, Torah | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Redefining Marriage

Power In Personal Relationships

The one who loves the least in a relationship controls the relationship. Thus spake Guru Luke…

Joe emails: If you keep up with that sort of video, soon you will be able to make money giving seminars like May 16th – Radical Love, Radical Truth, Radical Sex, and Radical God – with Marc Gafni and Sally Kempton

And you can offer bonuses such as this one http://www.marcgafni.com/?p=1384

Hey, this sounds like you: Lukas was born into this world with the inherent knowledge that he had come to assist with the great awakening. As a young boy it became obvious to Lukas that before he could help others to awaken he, himself, must embark on the journey of dark tunnels and high mountain peaks. Places that they didn’t teach us about in schools or books; places that can only be experienced. Since his youth Lukas has navigated many corridors of body and spirit and mind. He does not seek to teach or lead anybody, though he is ever present to be a light in your dark tunnels and celebrate with you on your mountain tops.

Posted in Dating, Personal | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Power In Personal Relationships

I’m An Adrenalin Junkie

More:

Posted in Personal | Tagged | Comments Off on I’m An Adrenalin Junkie

Rescuing Dogs

I have two single female friends who were driving down the street when they noticed cars honking. Upon investigation, they found a dog running wild. A dog without an apparent owner. A dog in need of love and nurturing. A dog they each brought into their car and then sought a good home for.

Women are all about nurturing and if they don’t have babies to look after, they seek out animals and they treat them like children.

Posted in Personal | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Rescuing Dogs

Smart Energy with Greenlite: Save The Earth. And A Few Bucks, Too

Here’s a thought: encourage practical environmentalism, the sort of campaign that yields tangible results and actually benefits consumers. Too much of today’s environmental movement – and this rule applies to all kinds of groups – is just rhetoric, and very little action. Unless you have the vision of a company like GREENLITE (www.greenliteusa.com), a brand dedicated to helping people save money whole also saving the planet.

GREENLITE is one of the world?s leading manufacturers of energy efficient lighting products, and one of the few Canadian companies that manufactures and distributes energy efficient compact fluorescent bulbs (CFLs). Greenlite’s bulbs bear the Energy Star label, both in Canada and the U.S. Simply stated, GREENLITE is a model corporate citizen — and that means a lot, at least to me.

By educating the public about restoring balance to the environment, GREENLITE goes a long way toward bringing us one step closer to a world free of pollution and other toxins. Led by genuine visionaries who share this commitment to aiding others, GREENLITE is my hero of the day. I salute them!

Posted in Ads, Green | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Smart Energy with Greenlite: Save The Earth. And A Few Bucks, Too

Support For Teachers Outside Hamilton High School

These shots were taken this morning. I get an email: “Come and check it out. Everyone is honking their horns. Plus how often are students out supporting their teachers?”




Posted in Education, Pico/Robertson | Tagged | Comments Off on Support For Teachers Outside Hamilton High School

Never Watch Another Web Ad

Slate.com reports: "According to Mozilla’s stats, Adblock Plus is the most-downloaded add-on for Firefox, attracting more than 700,000 new adherents a week. In all, it’s been downloaded almost 49 million times. The appeal isn’t hard to understand. The first time I loaded up Adblock, it was like shooting my browser up with Bandwidth Growth Hormone. The software gave a speed-boost to everything I did online. In order to catch your attention, many Web ads are stuffed with complex animation and sounds. Keeping all those aliens dancing eats up a lot of your computer’s resources, which is one of the reasons your machine’s performance plummets if you open many pages that are stuffed with ads. Ad-blocking software prevents your browser from connecting to well-known advertising servers. This lets you load pages faster and devote more of your machine’s processing power to important stuff, like playing Hulu videos."

Luke says: I just installed this in Firefox. Then I forgot about it. Ten minutes later, I was checking out lukeford.net and I panicked. All the ads were gone. I then looked at my site in another browser and all the ads were back.

Posted in Internet | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Never Watch Another Web Ad