Author David Aaron Clark, RIP

David Aaron Clark was one of my favorite writers, and a friend since we first talked in early 1996.

He died of a heart attack Nov. 28.

David was one of my great sources. He gave me a ton of scoops off the record.

For years we talked about getting out of the industry.

"What? And leave showbiz?" he replied once.

David told me a few times that he was leaving but he never did transition out and start a fresh new life.

I last communicated with David in January of this year. He sent me an excerpt of a book he was working on. I asked him when it would be published.

He replied:

I am part of a global conspiracy that involves every editor to whom I have submitted the manuscript. We are all in agreement that the public doesn’t deserve the burden of such lurid — but worst of all, true! — confessions without an easy moral tacked on the end of the book.

Am currently rewriting to include lies, damned lies, and the introduction of a 12-step &/or Scientology program to cure all the protagonist’s ills by the end of the manuscript & leave him shaky but ready to stand on his own two feet again.

Will write more later, am off to my tedious dayjob where I can’t access this email account!

Posted in Personal | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Author David Aaron Clark, RIP

Breaking Up Is Hard To Do

I was talking to a girl motzi Shabbos. She wanted to break up. She said we had no future together.

Afterwards, I went to take a cold shower. I noticed my chest was covered in red welts.

For the past 16 years, whenever I feel upset, I break out in hives.

I can keep a calm exterior, but the hives don’t lie.

Posted in Personal | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Breaking Up Is Hard To Do

O My Son Absalom, My Son, My Son Absolom! Would God I Had Died For Thee, O Absolom, My Son, My Son!

I try to imagine my life from my dad’s perspective (Part Two):

I gave my life to Jesus Christ as a teenager. That’s a great comfort for me. In the final analysis, it’s all in God’s hands.

I did the best I could. I fought the great fight. I ran the race. It’s not in my hands anymore.

You bring a son up. You try to teach him right and wrong. You give him love and books. And when he grows up, you have to let him go.

Luke was my third. My wife Gwen had breast cancer. She had a mastectomy in 1964. We didn’t expect to have another child. Luke was an accident.

While she was carrying Luke, Gwen became convinced he’d do something special for God.

We’re still waiting!

Luke had a blessed first year of life. We all loved him very much. Then life threw us all a bouncer. My wife was diagnosed with bone cancer.

I was overwhelmed. I couldn’t do my work — run the Religion department at Avondale College and conduct evangelical tours — and look after my sick wife and my children. We didn’t have medical insurance.

We found various people to care for Luke. Some weren’t ideal. None of them could love him like we could. The other kids went to other families.

After a separation of more than 20 years, my brother looked me up. He’s an atheistic communist. He had a hard time with me converting to the Seventh-Day Adventist church.

The church was a great boon to me during Gwen’s illness. They eventually picked up her medical expenses. Then they insisted I get medical insurance to make sure it didn’t happen again.

Hundreds of people prayed for Gwen to get well. It didn’t happen. She just steadily sickened. Before she went, she told me to marry my secretary Gill so that Luke would have someone to look after him.

A few months after Gwen died, I married Gill. Luke clung to her. "I’ve had many mothers," he’d tell her, "but I don’t want anymore."

We all left for England at the end of 1970. I was 40 years old. I wanted to get a second PhD. In those days, English degrees were more respected than American ones. I wanted to study the New Testament’s teachings about the end of time (not to be confused with that "Left Behind" twaddle).

I never lacked for self-confidence. "I’m here for a holiday," I told my advisor, Dr. F.F. Bruce at Manchester University.

It took me 18-months to get this second Ph.D. and then I took the family around Europe for a three-month holiday.

Luke was a bit of a worry. He had these sunken eyes that haunted me. He was a sensitive child, sickly, lost in his own world. He didn’t play nicely with others.

I came across him once in England throwing manure at these kids and screaming, "I hate you, I hate you."

I worried that he wasn’t a good Christian.

Sister White taught that it was a bad idea to start kids in school too early. From age six to eight, Luke wandered around the bush outside our home at Avondale College. We then entered him into second grade at the local Adventist primary school located at the college.

He was happy to get into school with the rest of kids but he still hadn’t learned to play nicely with others. There was always a lot to worry about with Luke. He was very competitive particularly with his best friend Wayne Cherry. He never learned that our value comes from our relationship with Jesus Christ, not from finishing first in silly games.

I used to hear about Luke swearing and poking girls with sticks and smoking cigarettes and stealing money from us to buy sweets. When we busted him in third grade for telling lies, I knew it was time. Spankings were not sufficient to rein him in. He needed The Word.

I started assigning him 40 pages of dense Christian apologetics to read every day and I made him type a one-page summary. He hated it but he learned to type and he learned all the key arguments for the truth of Christianity.

Did it change his behavior? I think he became more careful — more careful at getting away with stuff!

He was a worry. He loved to play with fire. He played with matches and burned our plastic tablecloth. I gave him a good hiding for that. He could’ve burned down the whole house.

We made him bike home at lunch. All his mates could play. We’d keep him out of trouble biking back and forth.

I used to get complaints that he was disruptive in Sabbath School. He’d come squealing in, racing fast, and then sliding down the floor. It was all a big show to make sure that everyone noticed him.

He didn’t realize that our worth comes from our relationship with the Savior. That Jesus loves us just as we are, but he doesn’t leave us just as we are.

Luke got into reading in a big way at age eight. He’d sit out on the porch hour after hour reading adventure books by Robert Louis Stevenson and G.A. Henty. I’d recommend to him books I loved as a child and he’d devour them.

I warned him that all these hours hunched over books were ruining his posture. I said, "Other people won’t bother to point this out, only those who really know you and care about you, but you need to sit up straight."

It didn’t do much good.

He rarely listened to his dear old dad.

We had some good times together. When I’d take Luke with me on an evangelical swing, we’d always bring the Monopoly game and we’d get in a few contests. He always enjoyed kicking soccer balls around. I did it just for the exercise. In the end, I don’t give a cracker for this fallen world. The only point of sport is to get a bit of exercise so you can more efficiently accomplish God’s will.

(Part Two)

Author Milton Hook (left) with Desmond Ford in 2008

Posted in Christianity, Personal | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on O My Son Absalom, My Son, My Son Absolom! Would God I Had Died For Thee, O Absolom, My Son, My Son!

Your Conversion

John emails:

I started reading your blog a few months ago when I was looking for "porn" and found your blog which is much more revealing and entertaining. I went thru your profile’s page and thought it was very informative. I looked up info on your dad, and although I’m not religious, I found him to be a very courageous man who stood up for something he ‘believed in’. And, something that a man of faith may not have contemplated while writing a treatise on a topic which was at the cornerstone of his faith and church. This is the "rule of unintended consequences."

I found out about it when I wrote a paper on the Calif. High School Exit Exam which explored the downside of "raising the bar" and mandatory passage of the above to obtain a high school diploma. The Calif. Board of Education did not consider the great number of drop-outs that would occur in minority children, plus the added expense for the increase in economic drain on the state. IE welfare, etc. They also did not expect the dramatic increase of those who first took the test in the tenth grade, and knowing they were never going to pass, dropped out shortly thereafter. This fact was not readily known since the schools tried not to report on themselves.

So, back to your dad. I don’t really believe that he had a total grasp of what it would cost him to make this stand against church dogma. And if he did, he is truly a hero in my eyes. Because why would such an esteemed intelligent person do something that had such stunning and drastic repercussions? I think it’s because he is someone who was vilified and accepted his fate and returned to the church that caused him such ruin. He did so based on principal and the courage to stand on it. That’s like Joan of Arc rising out of the ashes and not only forgiving those who conspired to burn her at the stake, but then taking them all out for a good steak dinner on her franc.

My point is Luke, that you have been searching for the truth, a holy man in different religions that you can emulate, a new Jewish identity, a hot woman, a new vocation, so that you may find someone or something that makes you feel like you are finally at peace or at least fulfilled. I think you should look within your own family. Dennis Prager is a step in the right direction, but your dad is where your journey should end. He is someone to look up to and emulate. I think he’s a helluva guy (my apologies for the slip, but I don’t go to church or have any beliefs that I would put it all on-the-line for in my entire life).

Now, if this has enlightened you, I feel I am the main cause (besides dad) of your future and eternal happiness. If you already truly feel that he is to be admired and praised, then just disregard all of the above because I really wrote to show you an article in today’s Jerusalem Times. No, I am not Jewish. But, I have some American Indian in me, and some cowboy.

The article is pasted below, but I must warn you that it doesn’t bode well for you converts in the State of Israel. Good reading and good-day. Tell you dad I said "hi", and as you can tell I don’t write for a living. Just when I want to be a do-gooder because that was my true intent.

Rabbi Seth Farber writes for The Jerusalem Post:

Imagine you are stopped by a policeman in Jerusalem, who demands to see your driver’s license. While you wait in your car, he goes and checks your record and then comes back to your car. "I’m sorry," he says. "Your license was issued in Tel Aviv. It isn’t valid here. We’re impounding your car."

Sound unrealistic? It isn’t. At least not when it comes to conversion.

There are more than ten rabbinates in Israel that refuse to open marriage files for men and women who converted through the Israeli rabbinate. Soldiers who have dedicated there best years to this country and have transformed their lifestyles to become observant are being told that their conversions are worthless. Having studied and focused on Jewish life, having passed through the conversion courts, and having waited to receive their conversion certificates, these soldiers cannot marry in Israel.

Are we reverting back to the third world?

Denying converts basic rights as Jews goes against Israeli law and against Jewish tradition. The Torah is very clear on the way to treat converts, recognizing their vulnerability. And yet, rabbis representing the Orthodox establishment are not being sanctioned for dismissing all of Israeli conversion in toto.

In Rechovot, the marriage registrar sends every convert who has a conversion certificate from the State of Israel to a rabbinical court for "certification." This is outrageous.

Posted in Conversion, Education, Personal | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Your Conversion

The Curse Of Luke Ford

I imagine things from my rabbi’s perspective:

Luke Ford was never my idea. Frankly, I blame Dennis Prager. This formerly Orthodox guy has a nationally syndicated radio show where he presents Judaism in very exciting terms, a little too exciting for my taste, because he sometimes excites the wrong sort, the Luke Fords of the world.

Mr. Prager says that Judaism is based on ethical monotheism — the belief that there is one God whose primary demand is ethical behavior.

Ethical monotheism sounds very nice, but in a few cases, such as Luke’s, it is taken as permission to f*** around, because, after all, what can be so immoral about consenting adults doing loving acts in private?

Now, I know what you’re saying. I’m an Orthodox rabbi. I shouldn’t use the word "f***". Well, let me tell you, I never even thought the word f*** until I met Luke Ford. Dealing with him for a decade has morally desensitized me.

It was never my idea to be Luke Ford’s rabbi. I think he’s my curse for espousing "Open Orthodoxy." If you ever wanted a good reason for why Orthodoxy should stay closed, I give you two little words, four letters each — "Luke Ford".

It was people close to me, the people I love most, who brought me the curse of Luke Ford.

I was new to LA. I doing something called "Meetings in Torah." I’m about the only Orthodox rabbi who does this. I gather with my colleagues from the non-Orthodox streams of Judaism and we break into small groups and study Torah with whoever shows up.

It’s holy work. But there’s a problem. Sometimes you attract Torah weirdos, as Rabbi Aryeh Markman at Aish HaTorah calls them. If they come around your shul, you have to shape them up or bust them out.

Several people came up to me that night and said I had to meet this guy Luke Ford. And for a minute, all I heard was Luke Ford this and Luke Ford that. When I met him, my first words were, "So you’re the famous Luke Ford."

We had him over for Shabbat lunch. And he walks in all jaunty. Then one of my congregants says to him, "Luke Ford? Were you on NPR this week?" And Luke goes "Yeah" and turns all apprehensive.

It was a look I came to know well.

"You were talking about your book." And suddenly my congregant turns all apprehensive because he hasn’t been able to forget the title — "A History of X: 100 Years of Sex in Film."

"Yeah," Luke Ford says, and you can see he can’t even say the name of his own book in polite company. Here’s his magnum opus, the fruit of a lifetime of exhaustive research, and he can’t even say the name. Instead he says, "It’s a history of independent film."

Independent film! A history of dirty movies is more like it. And my congregant is struggling for breath, my kids are running around, we’re all about to step up to the table to say kiddish, and my congregant chokes out, "Independent film? That’s one way of putting it."

Now, I hear what you’re saying. A lot of blokes like smut. What’s the big deal? Well, the big deal is that this is polluting my home.

You don’t understand about Luke Ford back then. He had the most innocent face. He was like "The Picture of Dorian Gray." No matter how many years went by, and how many horrible things he did, he kept looking innocent. But in his writing on Lukeford.com, you could see his depravity. It was like Howard Stern mixed with Dennis Prager mixed with Charles Bukowski.

I didn’t know this yet. All I knew is that people close to me told me he was a mentch. All sweetness and light. A breath of fresh air in the stuffy world of Orthodoxy.

He was quite chastened throughout the meal, aside from the time he tried to stir up my two boys to fight each other. They don’t need any encouragement, thank you very much.

And there was something else I noticed in that first meal — he had the hardest time looking me in the eye.

I’d usually run into him on a Shabbos morning, about 7:15. He’d be rushing off to daf yomi (a page of Talmud a day) at Young Israel of Century City. We’d exchange greetings and I could see him flinching because he didn’t fool me. I once said to him, "If you ever need to talk to someone, you can come to see me."

You should’ve seen him. He wanted the ground to open up and swallow him. He knew I knew who he really was.

The inevitable happened. His whole history of reporting on porn scandals came to light in the community when he was profiled in The Jerusalem Report. Not everybody read the article, but enough people heard about it to make Luke a lively discussion topic around Shabbos tables for a few weeks.

He got kicked out of every Ashkenazi shul in the neighborhood. Even Aish HaTorah kicked him out, and it’s an outreach center. They clean up people like Luke Ford for a living. Even Chabad kicked him out, and they pride themselves on providing a home for every Jew, no matter how fallen.

So here’s the thing. He wasn’t Jewish. He was playing dress up. He had a conversion, but it was through a Reform rabbi in Sacramento in 1993. That didn’t cut ice with us Orthodox.

Luke didn’t get kicked out for writing about porn. He got kicked out for not being who he presented himself as — an Orthodox Jew. That he wanted to convert to Orthodox Judaism, well, we’re tough on converts to make sure they are sincere. Writing a history of the porn industry does not seem like the act of a sincere convert to Judaism. We’re not into that stuff.

The community thought that at best he was a fraud. At worst, he was trying to infiltrate us to write a scandalous expose.

So Luke Ford sold lukeford.com for $25,000 and quit writing on porn. He started coming to my shul. We’re a bit touchy-feely for his tastes, a bit too progressive on women’s issues and gay issues. We pride ourselves on being inclusive. He’s very right-wing and unbelievably respectful of other shuls’ decision to exclude him. Even though he didn’t agree with our ideology, we were the last Modern Orthodox shul in the hood, so he felt like he had no choice but to give us a shot.

He’d sneak in to my shul, scared he’d be kicked out, and he’d stay in the back during davening, and then he’d rush out at the end. A lot of people couldn’t believe he had the balls to show up, that filth-monger. One of the pillars of the community said to him one Friday night, "I’ll give you one thing — you’ve got courage."

People couldn’t believe that Luke Ford would keep showing up to shul after The Jerusalem Report said the guy used to be the Matt Drudge of the porn industry.

I tracked Luke down the first time he came on a Shabbos morning. He was sitting as far away from me as possible, trying to stay out of my eye-line. I climbed the stairs, gave him the big friendly smile we learn at YU rabbinical school, shook his hand like I do with a thousand people on a Shabbos morning, and said, "Gut Shabbos, Levi. Please call me during the week."

Then I just stood back and watched him get the biggest attack of the trembles.

He knew I knew.

He came into my office later that week. I closed the door. And he sits there wobbling. I tried to settle him down by inquiring about his welfare and his whole sordid story came tumbling out. And he’s just dying. He’s dying for the tiniest bit of kindness. He’s just dying to know that I don’t consider him evil, a deceiver, a filthmeister. He’s just dying to be treated like a human being in an Orthodox shul. He’s just dying to fit in. He’s just dying to start a new life. He’s just dying for a second chance. He’s just dying for a place to pray.

I told him I’d think about things. I’d talk to my colleagues (who all told me to boot him, oy, I stuck my neck out for Luke Ford). I’d talk to his therapist. And eventually I let him know it was OK if he wanted to come to shul to daven. Everything else was off-limits. No kiddish. No lectures. None of the things he really enjoyed.

I had a liberal reputation in Orthodox Judaism, but I was no pushover. I lived my life by Jewish law. I was no fan of desecrating God’s name. By writing about Judaism and Jews and pornography and prostitution and sexual perversion and organized crime and his own spiritual journey all on the same website, Lukeford.com, he desecrated God’s name. He had made the chosen people, the Jews, look bad.

I was no fan of Luke Ford. I knew who he was. I just believed in giving him a second chance. I saw a divine spark in him. I saw his potential for greatness.

After a year of this, there were no incidents. You’re probably asking, incidents of what? Writing? Well, Luke Ford was such a controversial character in our community, many people viewed him as akin to a serial killer. An internet terrorist who’d terrorize people with words, with things that might be true but should not be made public, things like scandals and infidelities. A cyber-stalker. You should’ve seen the obsessive way he reported on his new blog Lukeford.net about Dennis Prager’s radio show. And he was a fan of Dennis Prager! Oy!

There were no incidents. Though I took him off probation and let him join the community, we watched him closely.

He was a chastened Luke Ford those days. He’d had the stuffing kicked out of him. Orthodox Jews can be pretty stern about the desecration of God’s name. I didn’t see the glimmer in his eye anymore. They were just sad. When I first met him, he could turn on the charisma and captivate a room. People would gather around him when he spoke. They’d ask him questions. They’d get excited about life just by being in his presence. I didn’t see this anymore. He just looked pathetic.

He was not popular in the shul. Some people loved him, but overall? Opinion stayed 50/50 during his tenure, maybe edging 60/40 against him during his last few years. Did he do anything bad in the shul? In the community? No. It was his blogging. His forthright manner made some people angry. He had no sacred cows. Everybody in power in Jewish life was fair game for his journalistic scrutiny. Sounds commendable, but practically, it’s not how Orthodox Judaism works. We like to keep sacred things private.

We once had a singles lunch at the shul. We got in a circle and shared two things about ourselves we’d like people to know. He talked about how much he loved cynicism and irony.

During the program, I saw that flash return to his eyes as he started chatting people up. His gestures got bigger and more flamboyant. "He’s a faegella," I thought and I got all tender. He was out of the closet and out of his depression. He was embracing his gay self. I would refer him to Beth Chayim Chadashim — the world’s first gay synagogue — and wash my hands of Luke Ford.

Afterwards, I got phone calls about his inappropriate language. He’d been talking dirty to the ladies.

Oy vey!

I called him into my office and we had a nice little chat.

I checked in with his therapist and asked, is he a threat to my shul?

I was assured he was not a threat. He was just an idiosyncratic blogger. A lover of free speech and loose speech.

He went to talk to his psychiatrist about the singles lunch incident and he got a prescription for lithium. He calmed down. The glint in his eye was gone.

Years went by. I started getting complaints about his blog. The same ferocious way he went after pornographers? He was now going after people in the community.

I didn’t know what to do. I met with him and let him know that anybody in the shul was off limits. He agreed. I let him know that he could talk to me about any of his stories before he blogged them. He agreed.

Well, he never took advantage of my services.

When he started at my shul, he was all timid about his blogging and everything else. As the years went by, he became increasingly vicious. It was like he hated the community that had rejected him. They’d booted him from shul for writing about sex, so now he was on the hunt for any rabbi who sexually misbehaved. He thought he was doing a service.

All I know is that I’d walk around our beautiful community and I’d see the walking dead. People he’d knifed on his blog and they were but a shell of their former selves. One colleague of mine resigned from the rabbinate after Luke Ford brought to light some of his sexual escapades with high school girls.

I liked Levi well enough but I could never make peace with Luke’s blogging. It’s not the Orthodox way. We don’t out people on blogs. We take care of things quietly. And what disturbed me the most was the joy he seemed to take in destroying people’s reputations.

One night I dreamed that I ran into him in an alley outside one of our shuls. The rabbi was on the ground bleeding and Luke Ford was dancing over him, blood dripping from his knife.

"Levi, what have you done?" I said.

"He deserved it," said Levi. "He was screwing kids."

"This is not the Torah’s way, Levi," I said.

"Yeah," he said. "But it’s my way."

He’s off his lithium, I thought.

Would he do this to me?

One day I got a very strange email from Levi. He wanted to finish his Orthodox conversion and he wondered who he’d have to bribe.

That’s how he saw things, that the only Beit Din that would pass him would be one that he’d bribed.

I ignored his email. The years went by. The corpses mounted.

Finally, I said to him, "You need to do an Orthodox conversion or you need to move on."

I steered him towards a rabbi with unimpeachable integrity. I said, Levi, I’m willing to sponsor your conversion, but you’ll have to convince me of your willingness to live by Jewish law.

He said he would live by Jewish law.

The conversion process began.

A couple of months into it, he starts publishing horrifying things on his blog about various rabbis who are sure to end his conversion.

I was on Sabbatical at the time. But oy, how I got phone calls. It was easier to just deal with the mess.

I biked over to Levi’s hovel and sat down with him and said, "Levi, sometimes you have to think strategically."

It was a good talk, but I left with the uneasy feelings that all my efforts on Levi had been wasted. Eight years down the drain.

A few days before Rosh Hashanah, he exposed a yeshiva girl in Jerusalem for writing an anonymous blog about sex. I let him know that humiliation was not acceptable, and I suspended him from the shul for two weeks.

He didn’t like that. He was all ominously quiet for a few days, and then, just before Rosh Hashanah, he exploded on his blog. He was now free to write what he wanted without having to fear a meeting with me. And he just went crazy. He posted all these bad things about the shul. About members of the shul. He speculated about how long I’d last at the shul.

He was a pen-wielding Rosemary’s baby.

He was everything I’d been warned about.

A few weeks later, we had a meeting. I said, Levi, if you want to come around here, you’ll have to accept me as the editor of your blog. You’ll need to close down Lukeford.net and start anew at PicoRob.com.

He said we had a deal.

And then I never heard from him again.

A few weeks later, all the horrible stories went back up. He was going his own way.

PS. I now write my own blog. It’s night and day compared to his blog. I follow Judaism’s dictates about acceptable speech.

I gave Luke Ford my best shot. He’s a work in progress. It’s too early to tell if he’s more of a blessing or a curse to my community.

Posted in Conversion, Dennis Prager, Personal, Rabbis | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Curse Of Luke Ford

Becoming Jewish Three Times

I used to go to Ohr HaTorah with this guy.

We reconnected at the first LimmudLA in February 2008.

He lives in Jerusalem and looks chareidi. He’s the most genial guy, funny, and easy to talk to.

Yes, most Orthodox Jews do seem intimidating to those who are less religious. They make you feel less than, a familiar feeling for me.

The New York Times reports:

A comedian now based in Jerusalem, Mr. Campbell began life as Christopher Campbell, born in suburban Philadelphia and raised Roman Catholic. His story, of a misspent, alcoholic youth and eventual conversion to Judaism not once but three times, is the stuff of shtick. And in Mr. Campbell’s genial and polished recounting it’s a tale well told.

(For the record, he notes that while he had been circumcised at birth, conversions still required a ritual called hatafat dam brit, a symbolic taking of a drop of blood — “and not from your thumb.” And though he complied, he believes that “three circumcisions is not a religious covenant, it’s a fetish.”)

What elevates it beyond comedy routine is that, punch lines aside, this is Mr. Campbell’s life, and that his quest for a “relationship with God,” as he puts it, continues even after the house lights rise. That he pursued the relationship so relentlessly, first converting to Reform Judaism, then to Conservatism, then to the Orthodox movement — in Israel, no less — suggests a personal search of great commitment.

Posted in Conversion, Orthodoxy | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Becoming Jewish Three Times

Keeping It Dry

On his radio show Wednesday from Zambia, Dennis Prager said that many women in Africa have the practice of buying a certain product to keep themselves dry during sex, thinking that the increased friction will result in more pleasure for their lovers.

Dennis said he was shocked by this. "As a normal guy, my brain says that lubrication is the best thing possible. One wants to know that one’s woman is turned on by you. That’s half the joy of it. At least 50% of the joy. It gives you an idea of the sexism which really exists, but there’s no feminist movement here. But in America… I remember reading in high school a book called ‘How to Please a Woman.’

"How come the feminist movement developed in America, where women have it best?"

Dennis noted that married men in South America, Europe and Africa frequently have mistresses while that is less acceptable in America.

Yes, there’s more divorce in America but there’s also proportionately more marriage. People live together without the benefit of marriage more frequently in Europe.

Dennis says that women in America have it so good that the feminist movement can concentrate on ethereal and nonsensical matters.

"It’s mind-boggling to see how far some women [in Africa] will go to hurt themselves, or to demean themselves, for the sake of a man. I’m not for that. In fact, it sickens me."

"Why would the best treated women in the world come up with something so virulent as feminism (which has been largely terrible for men and terrible for women)?"

"It’s always the least oppressed who make a revolution."

Dennis got a call from a black woman, a jazz singer, who worked at the Intercontinental Hotel in Zambia’s capitol city. She said that when she was in Zambia, there was a cooking oil shortage, because when wives found out that their husbands were cheating, they’d heat up the oil, go to the woman’s house, knock on the door, and when she opened it, they’d throw the hot oil in the woman’s face.

I think third-world customs are so charming.

Dennis: "College put ideas into men and women’s brains that were largely preposterous."

Posted in Dennis Prager, Feminism, Sex | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Keeping It Dry

Erotic Dream Girls

(L-R) Holly Randall, Larry Flynt, Theresa Flynt & Suze Randall

Here’s Larry after the facelift:

On December 3, Hustler Hollywood is celebrating its 11th year bringing quality products to the adventurous and sexually charged on the wild Sunset Strip. Revered by rockers and sought out by the trendsetters and the curious, Hustler’s flagship store’s location is in prime territory. Now with additional stores across the country and a highly profitable retail Web site, Hustler Hollywood is a commercial success!

To mark the occasion, Hustler is featuring a book signing by one of the industry’s most well-known photographers, Holly Randall. This is the public’s only opportunity to purchase an advance copy of her book before its official release. Holly’s love affair with photography started at age 12. Now, with great success at Suze.net, writing articles for Xbiz and snapping centerfolds for Hustler and High Society, Holly has come full circle with the release of her book titled Erotic Dream Girls, from Goliath Books.

“This has been one amazing ride,” says Randall. “I’m very excited about the release of Erotic Dream Girls. All the girls in my book are not only incredibly beautiful women, but they are also my friends. That really made it a very rewarding experience for me.”

This year, Holly launched her own personal site, HollyRandall.com, as a member’s Web site and started a photography workshop. Over the years, Holly has taken many photos of adult entertainment’s hottest female talent and has befriended many of them. Signing autographs alongside Holly on Wednesday will be Megastar Kayden Kross and the seductive Aria Giovanni who are featured models in her book and are close friends.

Hustler Hollywood’s 11th Anniversary Party kicks off at 7 p.m. and will include a special appearance by Hustler founder, Larry Flynt.

Khunrum emails: Luke: Will you attend? Will Holly give you a signed copy of her book? How about a peck on the cheek?

Bob emails: Perhaps a co-signing with Luke peddling his unsold copies of "Rebel"?

Khunrum emails: Buy Holly’s, get Luke’s free. The ol’ Two for One deal.

Bob emails: Hell, throw in a complimentary Alexander adjustment too!

Jane emails: Aside from the seemingly endless accounts of your on/off/not really relationship with the anti -orthodox girl…your blog has been quiet good!

Khunrum emails: Our heads hurt (headaches) reading this turgid dialogue. (major snooze) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Can’t you spice it up a bit with sex and humor f’Chrissakes?

Bob emails: Allow me.

"How did you feel about our political discussion last night?" he asked.

"**** me like a whore", she says, "Take out all your aggression toward women on me."

That’s good writing. That’s good reading.

The Tampa Show, Oct. 2005, where Holly and I met:

"Since then, she’s been your buddy Holly," says Yisroel.

Posted in Holly Randall, Personal | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Erotic Dream Girls

Luke Is Like Moldy Bread

Chaim Amalek emails:

I’ve just run out of things to say regarding Luke. The topic is like watching bread grow mold. At this point, what counts is that he be content living the life he lives, etc. Nothing more is expected or demanded, and perhaps what we saw as lost opportunities in his life these past ten years he saw differently.

PS Furthermore, as regards mold and opportunity, I find this decision process by which Luke rejected Holly in favor of various soon-to-be-menopausal-and-ergo-infertile women to be far more perplexing than the gay man’s preference for penis and rectum over vagina and natural breasts. But variety is one of the drivers of life, so more power to Luke if this floats his boat. At the very least, he helped make one man (the guy Holly married) happy.

Fred emails: Perhaps the situation here is that while Luke has moved on to a more sacred path, the advisory group remains firmly mired in the gutter.

Would someone please pass the filth, please.

Rob emails: In Luke’s defense, I rather enjoyed Luke’s piece about six months ago on the married Rabbi who enjoyed golden showers from his counseling clients. Other than that? zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

He said, “Would you loan me $15,000 to complete my Alexander training?”

She said, “Are you f***ing crazy??”

He wept.

Luke, Starbucks is always hiring and they give health benefits. Wake up and smell the low-fat soy latte, will ya? It is time to cut your losses on this Alexander training stuff.

Posted in Chaim Amalek, Personal | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Luke Is Like Moldy Bread

The Jewish Federation Of Los Angeles Chose To Base Its Hunger Campaign On A Lie

For the past few months, the Jewish Federation has campaigned around Los Angeles that one out of eight people in the city are hungry.

It’s a big fat lie, but that hasn’t stopped synagogues, including Orthodox ones, from embracing the lie and preaching it from their pulpits.

Is there any lie about America so outlandish that liberal Jews won’t preach it? I’m thinking in particular about the faux threats of global warming and heterosexual AIDS in America.

Dig this — the Jewish Federation campaign website is at GiveLifeMeaning.org.

I love that. Give your life meaning by peddling lies.

I’m sure that gives many people meaning. I’m not sure why we should admire that.

Last week, the Jewish Journal put this on its cover: "One Hip Campaign Tackles Two Problems: Hunger and the Federation’s Image"

Problem: There’s no evidence of widespread malnutrition aka hunger in California or the United States.

Campaigning to solve hunger is so much more sexy than campaigning to solve poverty. That’s why there are these food drives to bring cans of food. It makes people think that the problem is hunger. But the problem is not hunger. It is poverty and the complicated things that cause poverty, such as bad values, sloth, substance abuse, mental illness, etc.

The Jewish Journal wrote:

Ending hunger in Los Angeles is a pretty ambitious goal. Yet The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles is staking its identity on a new campaign, titled “Fed Up With Hunger,” that launched in September during the High Holy Days. Spreading the word through reusable shopping bags, strategically placed banners and a full calendar of events, Federation leaders are hoping that this obviously urgent and highly visible target will capture a new spirit at The Jewish Federation and help usher in a revitalized identity for the umbrella fundraising organization, one that will endure into the 21st century.

The campaign’s immediate goal is to ensure reliable sources of food for the 1.2 million Angelenos who don’t know where their next meal is coming from (see story on next page).

But accompanying that goal are others that have to do with the organization’s future — rethinking how people view Federation and revamping how Federation operates and relates to the institutions and people it serves.

This campaign attempts to transform Federation from a top-down benefactor into a collaborative community organizer — one that can rally Angelenos around a compelling social cause and then harness that energy into giving back to the community.

How do people feel proud about creating and promoting programs based on lies about America? Is there any calumny too outrageous that these liberal Jewish activists won’t exploit it to get power, money and fame?

The Jewish Journal writes:

For the campaign, Federation has latched onto the language employed by the Los Angeles Regional Foodbank that one in eight people in Los Angeles faces hunger. In an edgy video with a Beastie Boys soundtrack at givelifemeaning.org, a note drawn onto a ragged piece of cardboard reads, “1 in 8 Angelenos feel hungry every day,” a claim echoed by actress Debra Messing in a video message.

While one in eight people have a legitimate fear of feeling hungry every day, only a portion of those actually end up not eating enough. Still, the problem is real.

About 1.2 million people in Los Angeles County are food insecure, according to a 2003 UCLA Health Policy Research study that analyzed data from a California Health Interview Survey.

Food insecure? What kind of language is that? And what’s this talk about one in eight people have a legitimate fear of feeling hungry? Who determines whose fears are legitimate? Since when does fear of hunger equal hunger?

The Los Angeles Times reports today:

A recent federal report found that more Americans are going hungry — or did it?

"As American families prepare to gather for Thanksgiving, we received an unsettling report from the U.S. Department of Agriculture that found that hunger rose significantly last year," President Obama said last week. He cited a Department of Agriculture survey showing that 17 million American households (nearly 15%) were "food insecure" in 2008, compared with 13 million (about 11%) in 2007.

But experts say being "food insecure" is not the same as being hungry.

"I don’t think many people would claim that food insecurity equates to hunger," said James C. Ohls, senior fellow for food and nutrition policy at Mathematica Policy Research Inc., who has led several investigative studies of Americans seeking emergency food relief. "You can get to that by questions like whether you had enough money to buy food. That’s probably not ‘hungry’ by most people’s standards."

"Hunger," experts say, better describes the plight of a persistent lack of food and malnutrition every day. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has said there is little evidence of that among households in the United States.

"This is not malnourishment in the sense of people dying from hunger," Vilsack told reporters Tuesday, "but it is a circumstance where youngsters are not able to perform up to their potential."

The report avoids the word "hunger." It defines households as "food insecure" if sometime during the year they "had difficulty providing enough food for all their members due to a lack of resources."

Posted in Jewish Federation, Jews, Los Angeles, Los Angeles Times | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Jewish Federation Of Los Angeles Chose To Base Its Hunger Campaign On A Lie