Employment Prospects Grim For Least-Educated

David Deutsch emails David Kelsey: “This is pretty insensitive–think of how many American-born bloggers Luke has driven out of business?”

From CIS.org:

WASHINGTON (August 27, 2010) – Less-educated, younger, and minority American workers face the worst job market in decades, far worse than their more educated counterparts. However, the situation for these workers was very difficult even before the current recession. A report from the Center for Immigration Studies examines their employment situation in the second quarters of both 2007 (before the recession) and 2010. Younger and less-educated workers are the most likely to be in competition with immigrants – legal and illegal.

The report, “From Bad to Worse: Unemployment and Underemployment Among Less-Educated U.S.-Born Workers, 2007 to 2010,” is available online.

Among the findings:

* Younger and less-educated natives often do the same jobs as immigrants. During the second quarter of 2010, in the occupations employing the most young and less-educated U.S.-born adults, one in five workers was an immigrant.

* In the second quarter of 2010, the unemployment rate for U.S.-born adults who have not completed high school was 20.8 percent. But even in the second quarter of 2007, before the recession, it was 11.1 percent.

* Using the broader measure of unemployment that includes those who want to work but have not looked recently, and those forced to work part-time (the U-6 unemployment rate), the rate for those who haven’t completed high school was 29.3 percent in the second quarter of 2010 and 18.7 percent in the same quarter of 2007.

* The unemployment rate for U.S.-born workers who have only a high school education and are 18 to 29 was 20 percent in the second quarter of 2010. But even before the recession in 2007 it was 9.6 percent in 2007.

* The broader measure of unemployment for 18- to 29-year-old U.S.-born workers with only a high school education was 29.2 percent in the second quarter of 2010. It was still 16.6 percent in 2007.

* The unemployment rate for U.S.-born black workers without a high education is currently 29 percent. Using the broader measure of unemployment it is an astonishing 39.8 percent.

* The unemployment rate for U.S.-born black workers with only a high school education who are 18 to 29 is currently 22.9 percent. It is 32.4 percent using the boarder measure of unemployment.

* The unemployment rate for U.S.-born Hispanic workers without a high education is currently 22.9 percent. It is 32.4 percent using the boarder measure of unemployment.

* The unemployment rate for U.S.-born Hispanic workers with only a high education who are 18 to 29 is currently 23.3 percent. It is 33 percent using the boarder measure of unemployment.

* In the second quarter of 2010 the unemployment rate of U.S.-born teens (16 and 17) was 31 percent. It was 38 percent using the boarder measure.

* The total number of young and less-educated U.S.-born workers unemployed is enormous. If we look at the broad measure of unemployment for all workers who lack a high school education or have only a high school education and are young (18 to 29) or are teenagers (16-17), 6.3 million were unemployed in the second quarter of 2010.

* In addition to the 6.3 million unemployed or underemployed, there were another 16 million of these younger and less-educated individuals who were entirely out of the labor market. That is, they were not working, nor were they looking for work, even using the broadest measure of unemployment.

* To place these numbers in the perspective, there are an estimated seven to eight million illegal immigrants holding jobs.

Policy Discussion: One argument for amnesty and increased future immigration is that there are not enough Americans workers to do jobs that require relatively little education, such as construction labor, cleaning and maintenance, food service and preparation, delivery, and light manufacturing. However, the employment data analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies does not support these assertions. Unemployment is extremely high among the least-educated Americans who often do these kinds of jobs. In fact, the employment situation for such workers was very high even before the current recession began. Thus it is very difficult to find any evidence to support the contention that the country needs large-scale unskilled immigration. Since there is an abundance of such workers already in the country, employers who have difficulty finding workers may need to offer better pay and working conditions in order to attract Americans.

Methodology: All figures in this report are calculated from the public use files of the Current Population Survey, collected by the Census Bureau, for second quarters of 2007 and 2010. Figures are seasonally unadjusted. Figures for U.S.-born blacks are for those who chose only one race and are not Hispanic. Hispanics can be of any race and are not included in the figures for other races.

Posted in Immigration | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Employment Prospects Grim For Least-Educated

I Got An Email From Rabbi Dovid Orlofsky

Yesterday, I emailed Rabbi Dovid Orlofsky this comment by a blogger: “Two weeks before Rosh Hashana and in the context of an apology, Orlofsky feels free to insult bloggers who objected to the Slifkin ban. Those bloggers include rabbis, students, doctors, lawyers, unemployed, men, women most of whom opposed the Slifkin ban without ever insulting Gedolim and all of whom are surely waiting for another apology.”

In response, I received this from Rabbi Dovid Orlofsky:

Dear Sir,

I’m curious – do you ever verify if what you post on your website is authentic?

The letter than you chose to post is not an official apology or anything of the kind. It is personal thoughts that I wrote up for myself to try to get a handle on what had happened. I chose to review the situation, obviously from my point of view, to try to get a grasp on why someone would take a 2 minute snippet from 5 years ago and post it on the internet.

If the purpose was to hurt me and in the process cause pain to Rabbi Weinreb, I think that is a bad thing to do. Of course I regret words said in anger – I am not alone in nthis regard. I immediately apologized to Rabbi Weinreb and sat back and watched as people piled abuse and obscenity on me for speaking poorly. Seems a tad hypocritical.

I sent this letter to my friend of twenty years Rabbi Kurland to share my thoughts. He made the mistake of forwarding it to someone he didn’t know who then sent it to you. You then posted it as if I had released it.

You have my email obviously. Why not take 10 seconds and ask me if I released this? I would have told you know, it is private. I was working on an “official” apology which of course I can’t release now, since you put this up as if it was my official view and not just me working out issues.

So after you took a private corrrespondence and posted it without authorization, you want me to apologize to you? Don’t you see something surrelistic to all this?

Ksiva VaChasima Tova.

P.S. I am writing to you PRIVATELY AND NOT FOR PBLIC RELEASE. Please respect my private correspondence to you

I emailed back:

Dear Rabbi,

Agreements require the consent of the parties prior to the deal.

You can’t just blast someone and then say, please keep this private, and expect anyone to observe your wishes.

I haven’t taken any side on this controversy.

I enjoy many of your lectures and wish you a happy and healthy new year.

I love what Cathy Seipp wrote about this:

I have no patience for these imposed confidentiality deals. Over the years, various journalists besides Johnston have sent me e-mails that basically say this:

Hello. Although you have not asked for my opinion, I would like to tell you what I think of you. But I suspect, on some level, that this makes me sound like a pompous git. So you are hereby ordered to keep my insults to you secret. If you disobey, you have violated our non-agreement and are therefore unethical.

Rabbi Rabbs posts: “Maybe I missed something in the long drama, but I am still not seeing what that rabbi ever said that was so wrong or required an apology.”

Posted in R. Dovid Orlofsky | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on I Got An Email From Rabbi Dovid Orlofsky

Did The Nazis Like Bach?

In a 1996 lecture on Exodus 20, Dennis Prager says: We always have a debate in our country about funding for the National Endowment of the Arts. The people who argue for funding say the mark of a civilization is its arts.

That’s not true. Germany was the most artistically advanced civilization. How did a society that gave us Beethoven give us Auschwitz? But the question is a non-sequitur. There is no reason that a society that gave us Beethoven shouldn’t give us Auschwitz.

It hurts me to believe that I could cry at Beethoven’s 7th symphony and the Nazis could cry at Beethoven’s 7th. Josef Mengele liked Beethoven.

The commandant of Auschwitz would play Schubert at night. The Jews would sing and if he didn’t like their voice, he’d gas them.

It’s difficult for me to believe that the Nazis like Bach. That they would listen to cantatas about God and then go gas people.

Haaretz reports:

Richard Wagner is the classical composer most associated with the Nazis, but Johann Sebastian Bach was the one the party dubbed “the most German of Germans” and whose music was played at rallies to stir up nationalist zeal.

The Nazis praised Bach for his “racially pure” family tree dating back to the 11th century and for the “German” discipline of his baroque-style music. Felix Mendelssohn, on the other hand, who revived Bach’s concertos and overtures in modern concert halls, was scorned by the Nazis for his Jewish roots.

Posted in Dennis Prager, Music, Nazi | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Did The Nazis Like Bach?

If You Can’t Believe In God

I’m listening to Dennis Prager’s 1996 lecture on Exodus 20.

Says Dennis to his assistant Laurie: “If I don’t [do a good job repeating your point], feel free to resign. Did I tell you that she sent me to New York for no reason? I don’t even want to tell you because it would hurt her feelings that she got the date wrong and I went to New York for no speech. Do you know what it is like to walk on 33rd St. for no reason. It’s a phenomenon very few of you will experience in your life, being 3,000 miles from home for no reason. She’s the best though. She really is. You just have to live with that stuff. Everyone of us a quota of flat tires and you have to meet it.”

Dennis says the Torah is more interested in crushing false gods than in getting people to believe in God.

If you have trouble believing in God, I have another way for you to go about it — deny all other gods. From the Torah’s perspective, you will be affirming God. It is not possible to have no gods.

Denial of false gods is all that the Torah demands of non-Jews (in this regard).

Posted in Dennis Prager, Torah | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on If You Can’t Believe In God

Dennis Prager’s Favorite Android App

It is soundhound, which allows you to identify songs.

Dennis wants an app that you can hold up to a tree or plant and get an ID.

I’ve found that iPhone users tend to be on the left and Blackberry users tend to be on the right.

I have a Blackberry. It is a serious work tool. The iPhone is for trendies.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Dennis Prager’s Favorite Android App

I’m Tired Of Dating Girls From Broken Homes

Pick-up artist and author Neil Strauss told me that he does not date women from broken homes. They don’t know how to love the opposite sex.

I found that a fascinating insight. At the grand old age of 44, I think Neil is generally right.

If you grow up with a messed up relationship with your opposite sex parent, particularly if you don’t have an opposite sex sibling, the opposite sex is not real for you. It quickly becomes an object of contempt.

I’ve found that women who grew up in solid homes are much more solid in their relationships. They’re much more solid in their love.

Now I love crazy chicks as much as the next guy. They tend to be crazy in bed and that’s a lot of fun, but it is a lousy basis for a relationship, let alone a marriage.

I come from a broken home. My mom died of cancer when I was four. Ever since, I’ve been broken. I’ve had years of therapy but there’s still something glaringly not normal about the way I relate to other people. Those normal connections that infants make, I didn’t make, so I’ve gone my whole life desperately trying to get the succoring I didn’t get as a tiny child.

I’ve done the best I can to make the most of my life, but I’m emotionally deformed. While most of my peers have grown up and created adult lives for themselves, I’m still a four year old.

Beth posts: Amy Alkon recently talked about this. Fair? There’s no fair in love. Kids from broken homes often have abandonment issues, commitment phobias, and trust issues. I’m sure you can point to several examples of exceptions, but who says you’ve got a right to expect someone to give it a try and hope you’re one of the exceptions? It’s anecdotal but every man I ever dated had a single mother, and they all had issues, likely stemming from the lack of a constant male role model in the home. My husband was the first man I ever dated whose parents are still together, and the only one without any of these issues.

Posted in Dating, Marriage, Personal | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on I’m Tired Of Dating Girls From Broken Homes

How Do Libertarians Sleep At Night?

On his radio show today, Dennis Prager says: “I want to know how leftists and libertarians sleep at night knowing the slaughter that will take place in Afghanistan if we leave?”

I’m not a leftist nor a libertarian and I have no position on how the United States should conduct itself in Afghanistan or Iraq, but I think the question is easily answered with a question — how does Dennis Prager sleep at night knowing the massive genocide in the Congo could be halted with U.S. intervention?

We could intervene all over the world to stop genocide and cost ourselves thousands of dead Americans and spend ourselves into bankruptcy.

We have to primarily make foreign policy decisions on the basis of what is good for America.

Today’s New York Times editorial twice calls Republicans “insurgents.”

According to Wikipedia: “An insurgency is an armed rebellion against a constituted authority (for example, an authority recognised as such by the United Nations) when those taking part in the rebellion are not recognised as belligerents.”

From DennisPrager.com:

Prager H1: Chris Cuomo of ABC News tells his 1 million followers on Twitter that the Crusades and Islamic terror are morally equivalent. Really? What does a modern Catholic have to do with a Crusader? The Crusades were 1000 years ago… The NY Times hates judicial over reach when a judge overturns a policy that they like (stem cell research). But when a judge overturns a policy they don’t like (the traditional definition of marriage), that’s different story.… More NY Times: Conservatives are now labeled “insurgents.”

Prager H2: Independent candidate for Colorado Governor, Tom Tancredo, is torpedoing the chances of the Republican candidate, Dan Maes. To vote for Tancredo is to vote for the Democrat. This is third party “suicide” and incredibly self-destructive… Ironically, many Muslims outside the U.S. don’t think the mosque should be built at GZ… The CEO of Intel says that the administration is choking off any chance of economic growth with its massive new federal mandates – health care and financial “reform.”

Prager H3: Dennis talks to Claire Berlinski, investigative journalist whose work appears regularly in The Washington Post, Asia Times, The Weekly Standard, and The National Review. Her new book is There Is No Alternative: Why Margaret Thatcher Matters. Berlinski lives in Istanbul, Turkey. The future of this critical country is also a topic of conversation.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on How Do Libertarians Sleep At Night?

The Rabbi Orlofsky Mess

Background

Rav Adlerstein posts: “When Rabbi Weinreb (to whose ankles in Torah R. Orlofsky will never rise)…”

Rav Adlerstein blogs on another topic:

Unlike many New Yorkers I know, I do not have an easy time listening to Michael Savage. I squirm when caught in a car in NY when the driver tunes in to his show. While appreciating his support for Israel, I find his manner over the top, and his content simplistic. All this makes his July 12 remarks more significant, for the pure genuineness of his observations.

Apparently invited to a leyl Shabbos dinner, he meets ten Chabad teenaged girls, and is overwhelmed by their purity. It leads him to contrast their life style with that of their non-religious peers, and to advise them not to be jealous of the lifestyles of cultural icons, because nothing that the beautiful people have holds a candle to what the G-d-fearing have. He notes how many belong in rehab – and can’t stick it out. Why does their stardom fade and fizzle? Savage tells these girls quite simply: “Their souls are screaming out for what you have.”

Posted in R. Dovid Orlofsky, R. Yitzhock Adlerstein | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Rabbi Orlofsky Mess

Pro-Israel Group Battles IRS Discrimination

Glenn Reynolds writes:

WEEKLY STANDARD: Is the IRS Discriminating Against a Pro-Israel Group?

In a lawsuit filed in federal court today, the pro-Israel group Z Street alleges that it has been discriminated against. Z Street says, in its complaint, that was “informed explicitly by an IRS Agent on July 19, 2010, that approval of Z STREET’s application for tax-exempt status has been at least delayed, and may be denied because of a special IRS policy in place regarding organizations in any way connected with Israel, and further that the applications of many such Israel-related organizations have been assigned to ‘a special unit in the D.C. office to determine whether the organization’s activities contradict the Administration’s public policies.’”

In other words, Z Street was told by an IRS agent that it might not be granted 501(c)(3) status, which would allow the group to be tax exempt, because its position toward Israel differs from the Obama administration’s official policies.

Ordinarily, I’d find these allegations dubious. But in light of other stuff from this administration, not quite so much.

UPDATE: More at TaxProf. They told me if I voted for John McCain, we’d see thuggish attacks on people who oppose American foreign policy. And they were right!

Posted in Israel | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Pro-Israel Group Battles IRS Discrimination

The Ten Commandments

In a 1996 lecture on Exodus 20, Dennis Prager says: It’s called The Ten Words. The Ten Commandments is an English or Christian statement. The Hebrew Bible does not call this the Ten Commandments. The Decalogue is the Greek for ten words.

The idea of a covenantal relationship between God and an entire people is brand new.

The second uniqueness is that it regulates the internal life of the recipient of the covenant, not just how you treat the suzerain.

These norms of covenant are expressions of divine will. That the God of the universe is behind these commandments is unique.

God creates order in Genesis…and again with these commandments.

From this day forth, there will be a center of reference, a line of conduct… This is a second act of creation. A separation of chaos from order.

The undoing of Judeo-Christian civilization is the resumption of chaos. One example is androgyny. To the Biblical mind, androgyny is chaos. Male is male and female is female. That is order.

That’s why there is a law against men wearing women’s clothing.

Creation is not merely creation. It is creating order. We’re creating social order out of chaos with the giving of the Law.

The ultimate chaos is moral chaos where there is no right and wrong.

Why were the Ten Commandments not given in the land of Israel? You’d think the Israelites would get their new code in the Promised Land where they are going to practice it.

This is to be practiced around the world. If it had been given in Israel, Jews outside of Israel would not have felt obligated to keep it. Who feels obligated to keep French law outside of France or American law outside of America?

This shows the Torah’s universal concern. The law is not confined to a land. It is understood it will be practiced around the world.

The law is given in the desert. Everybody owns the desert. Therefore, there’s an implication that not only is it given so that Jews will practice it anywhere, but that anyone can practice it. It is given to the Jews as a group but it is given to the world geographically. It might as well have been given on the moon.

* The Jews are defined by a code of law, not by race, ethnicity or geography. This is unheard of. You can not become an American living in another country. You can become a member of the Jewish people anywhere in the world. It’s the one group where admittance is by birth or naturalization.

The Ten Commandments is a formulation of those conditions required for membership in the community. One who does not hold to these imperatives excludes himself from the community of believers.

* It’s the only time in the Torah that God speaks to nobody.

* The Ten Commandments are formulated in basically negative terms.

* Allen Estrin and I have produced three films (about goodness, character and diversity) for a company headed by two Christians. The videos are on ethics. We had such a big debate on the character film. We kept couching the ideas of character on what you shouldn’t do. And they kept saying, no, you should keep telling people what you should do to be good. And we kept saying, no, if people will just desist from doing bad things, the world will be terrific. It was a classic Jewish-Christian debate.

As Hillel stated the most important principle of Judaism, that which is hateful to you, do not do to others. That is the way Jews think.

It’s a fascinating issue. Do you get a better world by telling people what they should not do or by telling people what they should do?

If people refrained from doing bad things, the world would be heavenly. There would be no crime.

What positive commandment can I give that will in any way equal in its impact do not murder?

“Revere life.” That’s a platitude. It’s not an action.

All codes of behavior are overwhelmingly don’t. To say “Drive safely” is a platitude but it doesn’t tell me what to do. To know how to behave, I have to know no.

As a parent, it kills me to see how often I say to my kid no, especially when they are very young. You don’t want to bury them under an avalanche of nos, you want to affirm that all right, you can beat up that kid today. Something has to be yes.

If you want to raise a good child, you tell him you cannot cross the street. What would you say that was positive? Be careful. That’s ludicrous.

* There are no abstract moral principles in the Ten Commandments, like be careful, love your neighbor as yourself, treat others as you would like to be treated. Do you know why? Because it doesn’t work. To do the right thing, you need specifics. From left to right in this country, people think they are doing the right thing. The only way to tell if they are doing the wrong thing is by specific behaviors.

Let’s say you’re studying piano and I’m your teacher and I tell you to play with your heart. If you do not have technique, it’s worthless. If you can’t do a D-major scale, your heart is pointless. You have to know the right behaviors.

There is in the human being an antinomianism — a hostility to law. We like platitudes. People talk about compassion and rights, but they don’t mean anything. What is the specific behavior? Then I can judge if it is compassionate and if rights are important.

Who’s against goodness and compassion? Did Hitler say he was pro-evil? Never. He was idealistic. Ideals are good but not enough. If the world lived by the Ten Commandments, I wouldn’t care what ideals they had.

I want to be disgusting, mean and miserable but I live by the Ten Commandments! Fine by me. Much better than someone saying I don’t need the Ten Commandments, but I want to be a fine kind human being.

* The Reform Jews say we are for loving the stranger and loving your neighbor and pursuing justice. The Orthodox response is — we are for not writing on the Sabbath, not eating this food.

It is the classic debate between the person of principles and the person of law. I am on the side of law. Principles without law are worthless. They are platitudes for doing nothing or for doing the wrong thing (like communism which built the gulag in the name of beautiful principles).

* The Hebrew word for faith, emunah, occurs once in the Torah, in Deuteronomy, and it describes God’s faith, not humans’ faith in God.

Faith in God is not part of Judaism’s vocabulary.

Judaism and the Torah don’t expect you to take God on faith. They expect you to believe because God did things. Because it is logical.

The leap of faith is a Christian idea, not a Jewish one. In Judaism, it is a leap of knowledge.

For ten years, I moderated Religion on the Line. There was one particular pastor who cracked me up. He was a very simple man.

Somebody would call up and say, I can’t believe in Jesus.

And every time the pastor was on, he’d say, Did you ever see George Washington?

The caller would go no. The pastor would say, how do you know he existed? How do you know he was first president?

His answer was that I know Jesus saved mankind the same way you know George Washington was the first president.

Not a compelling argument in my opinion. You have to be a Christian to believe that Jesus is the Christ. You don’t have to be American to believe that George Washington was the first president. It’s not a matter of faith with George Washington. But with all the non-compelling nature, Judaism holds almost exactly like this pastor does. I’ve heard this from some Orthodox rabbis.

I don’t believe that God took the Jews out of Egypt. It was handed down to me. That is a typical traditional Jewish response.

I’m not saying this convinces anybody.

* Hitler believed in God. Terrorists who blow up innocents believe in God. Prager believes in God. “I believe in God” is a meaningless phrase and that’s why Judaism doesn’t talk about it.

I know nothing more about you when I hear you believe in God. What I need to know is what do you mean?

Imagine if the pollsters asked, do you know God?

Everybody associates religion with faith and you don’t find the word “faith [in the existence God]” in the Torah. The Torah is about what God wants, not what you believe, because it doesn’t matter that you believe in God.

I believe there is a creator God but not as a matter of faith, but rather as a matter of logic.

Even God has to do something to earn our obedience.

Judaism is filled with non-entitlements. You are not even entitled to Heaven, which is a classic Christian rebuke to Judaism. We know we’re going to Heaven. Do you? No. I have to earn my way every day.

God says you repay me by doing good things for each other.

Posted in Christianity, Dennis Prager, Torah | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Ten Commandments