Rabbs: The Power And The Glory

From last Monday night’s Torah talk:

Luke: “How was your Rosh Hashanah?”

Rabbs: “God awful. Seventy three straight hours of going out of my mind. I absolutely hated it. Brutal.”

Luke: “What do you have against going to shul?”

Rabbs: “I suffer from agoraphobia. Fear of too many people. Claustrophobia. Both. It’s hard for me to get out of my apartment to go to a place. I can’t set foot inside a shul filled with people.”

“When I was at my nephew’s aufruff, it was a shul. I wanted to be there when he got his aliyah. I was out in 30 seconds.

“The wedding was a different story. It wasn’t at a shul.”

“I was in yeshiva for years, 24/7. Davening. Learning. At some point, I overloaded. I’ve never been a person who likes to be seen doing things in public.”

Luke: “What about a football stadium? Do you feel agoraphobic?”

Rabbs: “No.”

Luke: “What about a strip club?”

Rabbs: “Never been in one.”

I’ve been reading Rabbs’ book and found this: “My daily routine is only a mere shadow of what I was once doing years ago. It is so obvious to me that being alone has slowly killed all of my desires to learn, daven, go to shul, and run to fulfill commandments.”

“I have been hit on by more than 1000 women in the frum community in less than the past two years. That’s right, more than 1000. Of those women, more than 99 percent of them want me to be the father of their kids and/or stepfather of their existing kids.”

Here’s more:

When I was younger, I spent Shabbos as a guest of various families, but that became old real fast. First of all, I got tired of being the only single person seated at a table full of married people. That always felt awkward. Second, I don’t like being around babies and small children, and frum families usually have boatloads of them, and so do their other invited guests. I recall once hearing a hostess with her hands full and looking for somewhere to dish her child off to say, “I am sure Hershel wants to hold the baby” and moving towards me with her kid, hoping to put it in my arms. Well, guess what? Did she ever ask Hershel? Because I know him pretty well and feel quite comfortable providing this news flash: Hershel doesn’t want to hold the baby! And, if that hostess never sees him back in her house again, she will know why.

So, I stopped going to married people for Shabbos meals a long time ago. That forces me to eat by myself at home every week, and I don’t know how to cook. This is going to sound selfish, lazy, and perhaps even sexist, but I assumed all along that I would be married by now and I was hoping my wife would bring her culinary skills into the marriage. Hence, I never bothered to learn how to prepare meals for myself. I guess I didn’t realize that I would be on my own forever. So, whereas I go to eat from a wide variety of gourmet cuisines at a plethora of fine kosher restaurants here in Jewtown all week long, they are all closed on Shabbos, leaving me with only canned tuna sandwiches for the Sabbath. Hence, my worst meals of each week are on Shabbos.

But, wait there’s more. I also stopped going to shul years ago. Why? For numerous reasons, one of which is that I can’t deal with standing out as single while surrounded by married men my age and younger, nor can I deal with being in a room full of singles, but being twice as old as everyone else.

…I am extremely tired of being asked the rude question, “where do you daven?” by so many Jews that I meet. No one should ever ask that to a stranger, because doing so inquires into one’s private life. What could be more personal to an individual than how and where one chooses to pray? I should not be put into the awkward and humiliating position where I must confess to total strangers where I pray or whether I pray at all. Those subjects are strictly between G-d and me.

…Getting back to the point, because it is too awkward for me to go to shul, and because I will not eat by families, I spend almost every Shabbos by myself. Because I am not allowed to drive a car nor ride a bike, I spend almost the entire Shabbos at home. Because I am not permitted to watch TV, nor listen to music, nor use a computer or phone, nor write, nor work out on my Nordic Track, I spend almost the entire time going out of my mind, bored to death, with nothing to do, no one to communicate with, and nothing but canned tuna to eat. For me, it is 25 hours of pure hell spent in solitary confinement in which I climb the walls thinking about how much I hate my life and how much I look forward to being dead already.

…Sometimes I venture outside of my jail cell to go on a walk for an hour, but doing so often leads to more mental anguish as I see frum Jews in my neighborhood. Almost all of them walk with their spouse, their family, or in a group of friends. When I see them, I am reminded of how alone I am.

…Basically, I try to avoid any situation where I will feel like the older single loser guy, and in this community where it seems no one else my age is still single, such situations happen quite often. So, to maintain my sanity, I tend to remove myself from the community.

…I cannot express enough how deeply upsetting it is for me to constantly celebrate everyone else’s joyous occasions while knowing that I will never have my own.

…My problems might appear to skeptics as nothing more than shyness, laziness, and low self-esteem. However, those critics would be mistaken, because I believe what plagues me is most likely what a psychiatrist once diagnosed as a psychotic form of paranoia, which might be most accurately described as agoraphobia on steroids. Basically, what goes on in my brain is not normal nor average, and is so profoundly warped that I sometimes wonder if I might be nuts.

Posted in R. Rabbs | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Rabbs: The Power And The Glory

The Marxist Vs. The Witch

From DennisPrager.com:

H1: Witchcraft
Prager H1: The media is all in a tizzy because Christine O’Donnell, Senate candidate for Delaware, told Bill Mahr 11 years ago that said she “dabbled in witchcraft.” Her opponent is still dabbling in Marxism (he’s a big supporter of Cap and Trade). Who is more dangerous to the country? The Marxist or the Witch?

Monday, September 20, 2010 Radio Show
H2: Pope in London
Prager H2: Benedict XVI was in the UK this past weekend. As always, he was impressive; so were the size of the crowds that greeted him…Should Catholicism liberalize itself as the mainstream Christian churches have done?

Monday, September 20, 2010 Radio Show
H3: Moore at Ground Zero
Prager H3: Michael Moore compares Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich to the Taliban… Harvard alum Elizabeth Warren is President Obama’s newest Czar. She’ll have control over a “consumer rights” department with a budget of $500M. Is there anyone left on the Harvard faculty?.. Dennis talks to Joe Miller, Republican candidate for Senate for Alaska.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Marxist Vs. The Witch

Did Rabbi Avi Weiss Invent Women Saying Kaddish?

Kaddish is the memorial prayer traditionally said only by men.

Left-wing Modern Orthodox shuls allow women to say kaddish, while right-wing Modern Orthodox shuls usually don’t allow women to say this prayer publicly.

I’m listening to a Torah in Motion recording of Rabbi Marc B. Shapiro lecture on Rabbi Eliezer Berkovitz.

Marc lists off various famous rabbis who’ve permitted women to say kaddish, including R. J.B. Soloveitchik and R. Ahron Soloveitchik, Reb Moshe Feinstein, R. Yosef Eliyahu Henkin, R. Chaim Ozer Grodzinski, R. Ovadia Yosef.

“This isn’t some new-found practice of Rabbi Avi Weiss… This goes back to Russia and the traditionalist poskim. It could be that in a traditional environment without feminism, this is not a concern at all, but in an era with lots of feminism, you’ll have right-wing Modern Orthodox rabbis who’ll say women can’t say kaddish because they are afraid of what it might lead to. Where there is no feminism, it is not a big deal. In the traditional Sephardic world, women could walk in to the men’s section and say Birkhat Ha‑Gomel after giving birth, etc.”

Professor Marc Shapiro published a famous book on R. Jehiel Jacob Weinberg.

Marc Shapiro is my favorite Jewish scholar.

I usually get whiplash listening to Professor Shapiro because he’ll go along in a purely scholarly and descriptive vein for long stretches and then suddenly he’ll include an opinion (usually in line with the approach of Modern Orthodoxy). What gets me is that he doesn’t use a different voice for his prescriptions. His pitch does not go up a few octaves, for instance, when giving a personal view.

Luckily, I am such a gaon that I can deal.

Dr. Shapiro: Eliezer Berkovitz comes to the Berlin Rabbinical Seminary. It’s right down the street from the University of Berlin. You could go there during the day and get a secular education and then come to the yeshiva at night.

A lot of yeshiva bocherim wanted to become a rabbi doctor. Today having a PhD can hurt you in Orthodox life.

At the seminary, Berkovitz becomes close to Weinberg. He was his leading student. Often the shiur at the seminary because a back-and-forth between Berkovitz and Weinberg. This mutual admiration lasted the course of their lives.

I interviewed R. Eliezer Berkovitz in Israel in 1988 about R. Yechiel Weinberg.

Graduates of the Berlin Rabbinical Seminary were not as learned in Talmud as Eastern European rabbis but were more learned than Yeshiva University grads (let alone YCT grads). It was the highest level semicha in Western Europe.

Seminary grads were writing halachic responsa. You don’t find that from your typical YU grad.

Into the 1950s, nobody expected R. Berkovitz to become a great Jewish philosopher.

R. Berkovitz spent most of the 1950s in Boston near R. J.B. Soloveitchik but they don’t mention each other and had little relationship. R. Berkovitz said that R. J.B. Soloveitchik was not forceful enough in solving modern problems of Jewish law.

In 1956, R. Eliezer Berkovitz published his first important work, Judaism: Fossil or Ferment?

It refers to Arnold Toynbee who was infected with the genteel British anti-Semitism dominating the English upper-crust.

In his famed multi-volume work of history, Toynbee called Judaism a fossil. He later developed a more sympathetic view of Judaism, largely thanks to a correspondence with Jacob B. Agus (liberal Conservative rabbi who was one of three Conservative rabbis who first permitted driving on the Sabbath).

Toynbee had three great debates with Jewish figures, including one with R. Yaakov Herzog, the son of the second Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi — Yitzhak HaLevi Herzog.

People like Eliezer Berkovitz were geniuses. He could show up in England and within a couple of years write the King’s English.

Toynbee saw Judaism as coming to an end with the birth of Christianity. That was a great dispute of the time but today Toynbee is the fossil, not Judaism nor Eliezer Berkovitz.

R. Berkovitz had an unfair hatred of Christianity.

Some rabbis say we can learn wisdom from the non-Jews but we can’t learn Torah from them.

Soncino’s books of the Bible have been redone and they no longer cite non-Jews.

The same debate applies to the works of non-Orthodox thinkers aka heretics. Some say you cite them but you don’t say their names.

The Gerrer Rebbe won’t cite Conservative rabbi Jacob Neusner, even though the rebbe is not Neusner’s equal in Torah learning.

The Gerrer Rebbe will cite Saul Lieberman‘s work but won’t name him. Artscroll uses R. Shlomo Goren‘s commentary on Tractate Brachos in the Jerusalem Talmud but they won’t mention his name.

In 1958, Eliezer Berkovitz moves to Hebrew Theological College in Skokie, where he develops his international reputation but was not allowed to teach Talmud.

When R. Berkovitz says Jewish law must not freeze, it is code for let’s get moving. For many, this raised the specter of Conservative Judaism.

As with R. Emmanuel Rackman, R. Berkovitz moved left as he got older and as Modern Orthodoxy moved right.

Through the 1950s, R. Berkovitz was at the center of Orthodox Judaism but by the 1970s, he was on the left.

After R. J.B. Soloveitchik, R. Berkovitz was the most important thinker in Orthodox Judaism in the 1960s and 1970s.

The halachic (Jewish law) vision of R. Eliezer Berkovitz was a failure. It never took off. But his theology was a great success.

Rabbi Berkovitz wrote in the 1960s to R. Jehiel Weinberg: “For a long time, I have known these ‘gedolim and tzaddikim.’ In their opinion, they are exempt from being concerned with civility, fairness, and honesty because their intention is for the sake of Heaven. According to their approach, their holy purpose makes all means kosher. There are an increasing number of young Modern Orthodox rabbis who’ve completely given up hope that we have anything to learn from gadolei Torah (great sages) of this orphan generation. Every day we see more clearly that we can’t abandon the future into their hands. We”

Dr. Shapiro: “These come from a group of unpublished letters from Berkovitz to Weinberg.”

Also in the 1960s, R. Berkovitz wrote to R. Menachem Mendel Kasher, who urged him not to publish his book on marriage: “The question isn’t if I am right or if you are right, but if an author who believes with all his heart that what he proposes is Torah, if he is permitted to publicize his work. I can rely on the haskamah of R. Weinberg.”

Rabbi Kasher had told him not to publish because the da’as Torah of the gedolim was against him. R. Berkovitz replies that he doesn’t care what the gedolim say.

Dr. Shapiro: “Someone is probably going to extract this and put it on one of the blogs.”

Berkovitz: “Da’as Torah is the will of the rabbis when their will has no basis in halacah. …I don’t know how their private opinions without a source in shas or poskim are da’as Torah.”

Da’as Torah is not Torah at all. It is the religious politics of the older generation, which is responsible for the spread of Reform and Conservative Judaism is destroying our world.”

Marc Shapiro: “Yes, it does sound like Blu Greenberg is writing the script.”

“I think everyone has to agree that da’as Torah is the will of the rabbis when it has no basis in halacah. The theoreticians of da’as Torah have said as much, that this comes from the fifth Shulchan Aruch, from intuition, from the understanding of the posek, he determines whether something is forbidden or permitted without justification [in Jewish law].

“From the Modern Orthodox standpoint, the problem was that this was always used as a tool to destroy the Modern Orthodox, to say that what they were doing was forbidden, and why was it forbidden? They come back with da’as Torah says it is forbidden. Anytime the Modern Orthodox try to do something to reach out to the less religious, they’re bludgeoned with da’as Torah… It closes off all discussion because you haven’t given any reasons, any sources.”

“I don’t know any of the Agudah gedolim who have declared themselves a gadol.”

“This is why I say da’as Torah is a crock because da’as Torah does not rely on the gadol but on the followers. The followers have determined Rav Elyashiv is a gadol. They’ll listen to him as long as they want to. If Rav Elyashiv said we should say hallel on Yom Ha’atzmaut (Israel Independence Day), he would no longer be a gadol.”

Marc Shapiro: “In his private letters, R. Weinberg was just as critical as R. Berkovitz about the gedolim… Berkovitz’s tone was harsher but they were saying the same thing.”

“Today Berkovitz is persona non grata in the Skokie Yeshiva even though from 1958-1976, he was their pride.”

“A few years ago, R. Chaim Twerski published a review of Not in Heaven. Why would anyone publish a review of a book 20 years after it was published? To trash it. His name is misspelled as Berkowitz.”

Rabbi Harry Maryles writes about R. Chaim Zimmerman:

There was also a running “feud” between Rav Chaim and Dr. Eliezer Berkovitz. He considered some of Dr. Berkovits views to be heretical and, to say the least they were not on the best of terms.

In 1964 (IIRC), Rabbi Oscar Z. Fasman, the long term president of HTC retired and Dr. Simon G. Kramer was hired to replace him. The student council of the Yeshiva high school decided to throw a “welcome” Melave Malka for Dr. Kramer. During the Melave Malke, R. Chaim spoke and made a casual reference to Dr. Berkovitz calling him words to the effect of “my friendly Apikores”. After he finished, a barely restrained Dr. Berkovitz stood up and said angrily words to the effect of: “I am not an Apikores, I don’t recognize you, and I don’t even acknowledge your existence”. He apparently was so enraged that he inadvertently knocked a glass Coke bottle off the table which broke. (Some people remember the incident as him throwing it on the floor).

The next day R. Chaim was fired. And shortly thereafter the Yeshiva had been put in Cherem.

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Torah | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Did Rabbi Avi Weiss Invent Women Saying Kaddish?

The Best Doctor In America

I’m listening to a 2009 lecture by Dennis Prager — “Why Have Our Universities Gone Wrong?”

Dennis says: “Did you choose anyone in your life based on what college they went to?”

“If somebody says to you, and this is particularly true for Jews, ‘I have the best endocrinologist in America’.”

“If you are a Gentile and you feel you have the best doctor in America, please raise your hand. Not one hand.

“Jews all have the best. It doesn’t matter where I go. I go to Milwaukee and I hear, ‘The best endocrinologist in America is here.’

“Maybe that’s why Jews are so healthy. They think they have the best doctors.

“How do you choose a doctor? Somebody recommended, right? You don’t even care what medical school he went to.

“Do you care where your pilot went to school?”

In a 2005 lecture on the Middle East conflict, Dennis says: “You have to acknowledge that Orthodoxy did a terrible job of attracting Jews to Judaism in Israel. It is a failing so grandiose that you could cry. The best chance in Jewish history in 2,000 years and it was blown. You have to ask why.”

PS. There are a bunch of Dennis Prager lectures available on DennisPrager.com that I have not heard yet and I need to hear them to compose a proper biography of the man and to continue my scintillating blogging. Can you lend some to me? Please know that your reward will be immense in the world to come.

Posted in Dennis Prager, Jews | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Best Doctor In America

God Is Not One II

I’ve joined the discussion at Spectrum magazine about Stephen Prothero’s new book on world religions:

David, Stephen Prothero’s book is not prescriptive as much as descriptive. He says nothing about learning from other religions.

I do not think “learning from other religions” is something most people can do. Practicing one’s own religion is hard enough. Who wants to be bothered by the strange beliefs and practices of the people across the street?

I think most of us most of the time think other religions are just plain weird (though we would not say this publicly).

“Searching” and “struggle” in religion is largely the domain of intellectuals. Regular people are too busy with the prosaic tasks of life.

I notice that much of the discussion thread is about what we should do. That’s one conversation. When we intermix prescription with description, however, we often get confused.

Whether it is because of my bent or my background, I generally prefer description, which is what I aimed at in my review.

GREG LEAKE EMAILS: Hi Luke,

Good review. I like the implied joke of G-d is one…II.

Prothero was deceptive when he titled his book God Is Not One. The proper title would have been Religion Is Not One. By calling his book God Is Not One, he was exercising a kind of theological judo.

Everyone who studies comparative religions or the history of religions already knows about the differences that Prothero points out. However, the nature of this metaphysical being that we refer to by the word “God” is not affected by different perceptions of what his almighty nature might be. Unless one is a polytheist, there may be many religions, but there is only one God.

Before the 1940s everyone interested in religion would have focused on these same differences. So really this is simply a way of reconstituting the way we all felt about religions years ago. The only new thing about religions began to be introduced by Mircea Eliade and others who started the various humanist disciplines of comparing religions and their histories.

We have discovered that despite different ethical precepts and practices, holidays, and other particulars unique to specific religions, at root religions are more alike than different. We have also discovered some facts about our ways of viewing religion that represent a challenge to theology that has been built up by both the silly and the profound for many centuries. Frankly, some of the things that we know would call for a reevaluation of some of our theology if it were any other subject than religion.

In a chapter about Martin Buber, Paul Tillich talks about his last visit with his old friend. As he reflected on this last visit, he wrote:
“The reason was that Buber’s universalism transcended any particular religion, although it was derived from his interpretation of Judaism, just as I derived my universalism from what I think to be the true nature of Christianity. This is the reason why our dialogs were never Jewish-Christian dialogs, but dialogs about the relation of God, man, and nature. They were dialogs between a Jew and a Protestant who had transcended the limits of Judaism as well as the limits of Protestantism while remaining a Jew, the one, and the other a Protestant. This concrete universalism seems to me to be the only justifiable form of universalism.”

Posted in Religion | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on God Is Not One II

Changing the Immutable: How Orthodox Judaism Rewrites Its History

Rabbi Marc B. Shapiro‘s book is due out in 2011. I can’t wait.

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro | Comments Off on Changing the Immutable: How Orthodox Judaism Rewrites Its History

Dennis Prager: ‘Jews are the most religious people’

I’m listening to a 2009 lecture by Dennis Prager — Feelings: The Key to the Liberal Mind.

Dennis: “Why would Jews be against gun ownership after the Holocaust? If every Jewish family in Europe had one gun, the Holocaust would not have occurred in the same numbers… The handful of revolvers and molotov cocktails homemade in the Warsaw Ghetto took so many Nazi lives, I’m not sure the German army would’ve put up with this. Hey, we have to win a war. That’s more important than gathering the Cohen family for the gas chamber.

“The Jewish mind has been addled by the amount of hatred and evil inflicted on Jews. The Jewish people isn’t well.”

“The most successful Jew is worried that something will happen tomorrow to him. There is no Jew that doesn’t walk around like that.”

“When Jews are with a non-Jew for a period of time, they start thinking, would this Gentile save my life?”

“Many Jews have Stockholm Syndrome. They identify with their persecutors. They feel that if they crap on Jews enough, the non-Jew who hates Jews will love them.”

“When the ghetto walls were knocked down, Judaism as practiced was not prepared to take on the challenge of Mozart, Heine, and the great philosophers and the great artists, so Jews left Judaism in vast numbers. Ninety percent left Judaism.

“Jews stayed deeply religious and their religion was a secular messianism, which was any leftist doctrine of the time. Jews are the most religious people on earth but for the vast majority of them, their religion is not Judaism. The more religiously active the Jew, the less likely he is to be a liberal. If you believe that God gave the Torah, you are overwhelmingly likely to be a conservative.”

“When Republican candidates don’t go to NAACP meetings, I just don’t understand it. I love to speak to people who differ with me. I’d go to the convention of the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. I went on gay radio. I’d go to an all-black meeting in a second to tell them to reconsider how they vote.

“I’ve said for 30 years there are two parties in America — the dangerous and the stupid. I’m a member of the stupid party.

“How stupid is the party? It almost doesn’t even know the existence of talk radio, the single biggest factor in articulating conservative values in America. I don’t think John McCain could’ve named a single talk show host outside of Rush Limbaugh, who he admitted he had never heard.

“I was gonna run for the U.S. Senate against Barbara Boxer. I don’t know that I should’ve. I think I touch more people through radio. That’s what I ultimately decided. As a senator, there’s one advantage — if you can get to the Senate, you can get to the presidency, but I don’t think that I’ll be president.

“I met with one of the highest ranking Republicans at his office [Arnold Steinberg?] in Beverly Hills and he didn’t know who I was. I don’t take it personally. It’s impossible to offend me. I wasn’t offended. I just thought, how could someone be so high up in the Republican party and never have heard of a man who had been on talk radio in his own city for 20 years? They are so out of it in the Republican party.”

“We do need an articulate charismatic spokesman. The press of course will eat up anyone who does this. I flirt with running all the time, with throwing my hat in the ring. I know I’m articulate. I know how to speak to people. I’ve had a lot of practice in this but I know among other things what the press would do to me. Talk about a track record. They would get all the recordings from 26 years in radio. They would isolate 17 different clips to show me to be every evil thing possible.”

Posted in Dennis Prager, Jews | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dennis Prager: ‘Jews are the most religious people’

Why Does The World Hate America?

Dutch novelist Leon De Winter said on Dennis Prager’s radio show this week: It’s not only hate. It’s also admiration and love and envy.

It has old roots. The whole idea of America was denigrated by the European aristocracy from the beginning. Who are these ordinary people to create their own country? They need princes to rule over them.

That arrogance never left the European mind.

On top of that, America became a huge economic power. The aristocracy considered industry a negative thing. That was the territory of the aristocracy. The rise of America was a sign that simple people were trying to create wealth and power and that was bad.

For decades, America has been the most powerful country. Popular culture comes from America. It is the most seductive nation the world has seen.

We like to copy American life. On the other hand, because of traditional anti-American sentiments, we feel we’re more cultured and therefore superior to America.

Dennis: We’re too happy. It bugs people.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Comments Off on Why Does The World Hate America?

Stalled

He sat in his car after therapy and did battle.

He was parked on a hill. His wheels were swung in as the law demanded. But the damn ignition wouldn’t turn. The wheel wouldn’t turn. The automatic transmission wouldn’t turn.

He’d spent all this money on his car. He’d had his license since he was 18. He’d driven to Vancouver and back. He was a man of the world, the Hustler magazine Asshole of the Month for December 1999, and yet he was stalled.

Something was very wrong with his life.

He had two and a half hours until the onset of Yom Kippur. He knew there was no need to panic. He’d been in this position before with various cars. What you do is jiggle the wheel and the ignition and the transmission and eventually things would free up and he’d be on his way.

He jiggled the wheel to no effect. He jiggled the ignition to no effect. He jiggled the automatic transmission to no effect. He couldn’t even shift into neutral. His key just hit a lock and wouldn’t turn.

It didn’t seem fair. He was almost finished with his second year of Alexander Technique teacher training. He was a model of poise and grace. He wrote essays about the tranquilizing benefits of the Technique. He’d just published a book review in Spectrum magazine. He’d interviewed Joe Montana, Bill Walsh, Steve Young and Tom Landry. He was a seminal blogger. He was the future of journalism and always would be.

Damn, damn, damn. He never thought he’d be 44 and broke and tired and unmarried. Where were his kids and PhD and critical acclaim? He always thought he’d be a star by now, wouldn’t have to worry about such prosaic matters as a stalled car. No, he was going to follow Dennis Prager all the way to the White House.

Nothing creepy about me, he thought. I just need to get my key in the lock and turn it around a few times and there will be joy.

Frankly, I’m the easiest man in the world to get along with. What was the world’s problem?

Joy. It was just around the corner. Just a few jiggles and giggles and clicks and he’d have joy.

He looked out the window and saw two black gangbangers staring at him.

They didn’t fear the white man like they used to.

He tightened and compressed his neck, grunted, and wrestled the wheel back and forth until it finally popped. He turned the key and his car started. Before it completely stalled again, he shifted into neutral, flooded the gas, pushed down on the brake to make sure it was still working, and executed a 180 degree turn onto Pico Blvd.

I want to be smooth. I want to work the room. I want a hot girlfriend. Even more, I want to be my authentic self in deep connection with certain others. God, don’t let me stall on this holy journey.

Posted in Personal | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Stalled

She Threw Acid In Her Own Face To Get Attention

I don’t find the following story hard to understand. I think it is easy to understand. People will do almost anything, including throwing acid in their own face, to get attention.

Most people, including myself, grow towards attention in the same that plants angle for the light.

This is a reason that many people choose to be unhappy — because they get more attention that way. Who are parents going to bestow more attention on? The ten kids who are happy or the eleventh kid who is unhappy?

Report:

VANCOUVER, Wash. — Police in Washington state say their investigation of the woman who burned her face with acid and then reported she’d been attacked is nearly finished – but they still can’t explain her motive.

A Vancouver police spokeswoman said Friday that Bethany Storro has offered no explanation for her self-inflicted injuries and lie, and investigators haven’t developed one, beyond saying she was emotionally fragile.

On Aug. 30, Storro told police a woman approached her outside a coffee shop and tossed acid in her face. Storro later confessed under questioning that the burns were self-inflicted.

From DennisPrager.com:

Friday, September 17, 2010 Radio Show
H1: Acid Hoax
Prager H1: The story two weeks ago of the young woman who had acid thrown in her face in Vancouver, Washington turns out to be a fraud. We don’t know what lurks in the hearts of human beings… Dennis talks to David Dreier, Congressman for the 26th District of California… A new day, a new agency, a new Czar, a new Harvard faculty alumnus…

Friday, September 17, 2010 Radio Show
H2: Happiness Hour: Don’t Wait to Be Happy
Prager H2: We all think “if only (fill in the blank), I’d be happy. It’s human nature. But we need to fight against this tendency. Work to be happy now. Best of Prager Hour. Originally broadcast July 10, 2009.

Friday, September 17, 2010 Radio Show
H3: Open Lines
Prager H3: Per usual, callers set the agenda. Issues raised include: Does Dennis agree that homosexual members of the military can function in shower and locker room settings without tension; Do Jews and Christians go to the same heaven; Does Dennis agree that music created since the 1960’s is driven by corporate business models rather than a love of music.

Thursday, September 16, 2010 Radio Show
H1: The Far Right
Prager H1: According to the mainstream media, if you’re a Republican, if you’re a conservative, you are, ipso facto, on “the far right.”.. Dennis talks to David French, senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund and as the director of the ADF Center for Academic Freedom. The ADF is conducting a major fund raising drive and we’re helping them… Who is out of touch with Americans? The Tea Party or the Los Angeles Times?

Thursday, September 16, 2010 Radio Show
H2: Global What?
Prager H2: John Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, says that the term “global warming” is “a dangerous misnomer.” His explanation as to why exposes the fraud that is the Global Warming movement. He has new term – Global Climate Disruption. What does that mean?.. The FDA stands in the way of cancer cures. It’s very angering… The media will spend the next six weeks trying to portray Republican candidates as “crazies.” But what’s so crazy about smaller government?

Thursday, September 16, 2010 Radio Show
H3: Leon de Winter
Prager H3: Dennis talks to Leon de Winter, international best selling novelist and columnist for the leading magazine in the Netherlands, Elsevier and , one of the Prager Show’s favorite guests. Leon just returned to the USA from a summer in Europe.

Join Dennis on Facebook

We’ve been doing a lot of work on our Facebook page over the last couple of months. And now, if you haven’t already done so, we invite you to join us. Go here and join the party! There’s a lot going on — show clips, posts from Dennis, posts from Allen, posts from listeners, photos and more. You’ll love it.

Another Day, Another Czar

Another day, another czar, another agency, another Harvard faculty member telling us how to live.

Spending More on Ads Against Health Care than for It

If ObamaCare is so great why aren’t Dems singing its praises? Why when it’s election do they sound like conservative tax cutters?

Dennis Talks to Leon de Winter

Dennis talks to one of the Prager Show’s favorite guests, international best selling novelist and columnist for the leading magazine in the Netherlands, Elsevier. Just back from a summer in Europe. His novel, God’s Gym, translated into English, is available at Amazon here.

The FDA May Kill This Woman

Avastin is saving a woman’s life. The FDA may take it away from her. A simple, compelling story that will make you very angry. It should. And, how about this question? Why don’t we have more cancer cures? The world’s most famous scientist answers the question — too much government interference.

Another “New” Name for Global Warming

John Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, says that the term “global warming” is “a dangerous misnomer.” His explanation as to why exposes the fraud that is the Global Warming movement. He has new term — GCD. Try to guess what it stands for?

Who’s Out of Touch with America?

Read this article in today’s Los Angeles Times and you tell me who’s out of touch with America? The Los Angeles Times or the Tea Party?

More on Alliance Defense Fund

Dennis talks to David French, senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund and as the director of the ADF Center for Academic Freedom. The ADF is conducting a major fund raising drive this week and we’re helping them. The ADF is the antidote to the ACLU. Go here for more information. or call 888-905-7729.

100 Voices: A Journey Home

Dennis talks to Nate Lamb, internationally renown Cantor of Stephen S. Wise Temple, Los Angeles and producer of “100 Voices: A Journey Home” a documentary about a sentimental journey of 100 cantors to Poland and the new flowering of Jewish culture there. You can learn more about the movie and where you can see it in your city here.

France Bans the Burqa

Ils montrent some guts. Tres bien.
Posted in Dennis Prager, Satire | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on She Threw Acid In Her Own Face To Get Attention