The Community Comes First

I grew up a Protestant. The center of our faith was individual salvation to Heaven.

I loved movies that glorified the individual against the group such as 1966’s A Man For All Seasons.

When I turned 18, I dropped my belief in God and I dropped my religious observance. I went to work on the Sabbath at radio stations KAHI/KHYL in Auburn. Then I’d come home and work around the house. I’d chop and clear until my father asked me to desist as it was the Sabbath.

I’m listening to a 2007 lecture by Dennis Prager on Leviticus 13:4: “If the spot on his skin is white but does not appear to be more than skin deep and the hair in it has not turned white, the priest is to put the infected person in isolation for seven days.”

The removal isn’t for contagion or health reasons or the priest could have nothing to do with the person. Instead, the reason is the well being of the community. It is building its tabernacle, its sancta sanctorum, and the closer you get to this holy place, the healthier and more life-giving you have to be.

Crippled priests or priests with crushed testes or severed phalluses could not serve in the temple.

Sacrificial animals have to be unblemished.

The Torah’s view is that whatever sadness there is for the individual, the establishment of this sacred community takes precedence.

The Torah’s view is that the community must come first.

Why was the man who gathered wood on Shabbat put to death (as directly ordered by God)?

God is trying to create a holy community (life-centered) and to separate it from the evil around it. When a guy publicly defies the Ten Commandments, he’s trying to overthrow the entire attempt to make a better community.

If the guy was in his own tent writing letters, nobody would’ve bothered him, but gathering wood is a public act. It’s a form of rebellion.

Yes, a hunchback priest could slaughter turtle doves on the altar but the Torah wants priests who are wholly healthy.

In our society, we place tremendous importance on looks, but not when it comes to religion.

If you are a hunchback, you don’t get a job in TV reading the news. You can read the news. You might even do it better because you are already hunched over and looking down, but nobody today argues that TV must hire hunchbacks or people with skin diseases.

We are OK with wholeness and good looks for trivia, but if the Torah wants perfect looks when it comes to the Holy of Holies, ohmigod, what a weird book.

I’ve never bought the argument — God made me this way. They say it with the deaf and with gays. If you could get a cochlea implant and hear, you should. If you could take a pill and make love to the opposite sex, the Torah would want you to.

This only makes sense if you understand that the skin disease makes you look deathly.

The New Testament frequently condemns fornication (pre-marital sex). The Torah does not mention pre-marital sex. The loss of virginity can hurt a girl’s chance for a husband, so you have to marry her or pay her what her virginity is worth.

There’s not a word in the Torah against masturbation. The sin of Onan was not masturbation. It was that he would not have procreative sex with his brother’s widow.

When you know something is banned, you think about it less. It is possibilities that you think about.

Your father owns your mother’s sexuality. Only your father does.

The Torah desexualized two things thoroughly sexualized in the ancient world — God and the family.

I say to men — watch how you speak to your daughter or step-daughter. Don’t flirt with her. You must be asexual. Completely.

Due to the Torah, widows could no longer be handed around a family as wives and concubines.

Posted in Dennis Prager, Jews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Community Comes First

Teaching Torah In Las Vegas

In a 2007 lecture on Leviticus 12 – 13, Dennis Prager says: Twenty five years ago, I was teaching Torah to the Jewish community of Las Vegas on a regular basis. They would fly me in every month.

One time I’m on the plane and I pull out a Tanach (Bible) and start studying it. It’s an LA – Vegas flight where Biblical studies are not the usual reading material.

I notice the guy next to me keeps staring. He’s not thrilled.

Finally, I said, I see you keep looking over. Why?

It turns out the guy is an Israeli who’s visiting the U.S. and all he wants to do is to have fun. The last thing he has on his mind on a flight to Vegas is the Torah. He thought, I can’t get away from this. Twelve thousand miles from home and a guy pulls out on a flight a Torah.

I felt bad for the guy. I tried to comfort him. Don’t worry. This isn’t normal. Enjoy the tables.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Teaching Torah In Las Vegas

The Worst Thoughts On Yom Kippur

Heshy Fried blogs:

Water running past my knuckles – ahhhh!

Maybe after I wash my fingertips I could by accidentally touch my lips.

Posted in Heshy Fried | Comments Off on The Worst Thoughts On Yom Kippur

Jewish Manners

I just put “Jewish manners” into Google and expected no results.

I’ll never forget the shock of my first visit to a synagogue. Most of the people there were so short and ugly. They looked like they had just stepped out of an anti-semitic cartoon. Half of the crowd looked like trolls. And most of them had reproduced little baby trolls who were acting like Attila the Hun.

I learned later through my studies that hundreds of years of living in the ghetto had taken their toll on Jewish looks and for the first time in my life I began to fetishize shiksas.

My third shock with Jews was at how blunt and abrupt they could be. I was raised a Christian and Christians put a premium on niceness.

I remember the first time I stepped into an Orthodox shul, the rabbi threw me out because I hadn’t signed up in advance and gotten his approval to attend his conversion class.

When it came time for kiddish at shuls, I was appalled at how Jews would push and shove to grab their food. As a goy, I was trained to wait patiently in line.

A friend of mine teaches at a Seventh-Day Adventist college. She was giving a talk at a retreat on vegetarianism and this Jewish guy stood up and said, “In all of my life, I have never heard such nonsense.”

He went on and on. My friend just stood there in shock. Protestants don’t talk this way.

I’ve done some public speaking to Jews and to goyim and the goyim are a lot easier to deal with.

As Dennis Prager notes, Jews never pray before a speech that God will open their hearts and minds to hear the words of a fellow Jew.

A Jewish couple once visited me when I was staying with goyim. They had kids who ran wild.

Afterwards, my hosts said to me in that understated goyisha manner, “Jewish children are very boisterous, aren’t they?”

Go to a synagogue and go to a church and tell me which place is more reverent. There’s no comparison. And yes, I do think goyisha kids do tend to be more restrained in public.

I’ve been in Jewish life for almost 20 years now and I still can’t believe the chutzpah of Jews who close down a lane of traffic on Pico Blvd so they can run into a store, pick up what they want, and then run back to their car two minutes later and drive off with a hundred cars stopped behind them. Few goyim would do this.

I was telling some Jews over Shabbos that Jews, religious or secular, don’t seem to put much of a premium on manners.

They recited to me teachings on “derech eretz” but I was talking about the reality of Jewish life, not some of Judaism’s widely-ignored teachings.

I hear there is no word for “etiquette” in Hebrew.

I remember Rabbi Benjamin Blech telling the joke of a plane landing in New York in December and the pilot saying, “Please remain seated until we’ve come to a complete stop. For all those who’ve followed my instructions, I want to wish you a Merry Christmas. For everyone else, I say Happy Hanukkah.”

Dennis Prager has talked about airline attendants have become borderline anti-Semitic from working the New York to Miami shuttle.

Jews are a demanding group. Because of my background, I have never sent back food in my life in a restaurant. I’ve never complained to a waiter. I’m a timid gentle soul. My every trip to a kosher restaurant is a learning experience (made much more pleasant when others pick up the bill).

Things that are of primo importance to Christians — niceness, manners, faith, hope, love, — are of secondary importance to Jews who are more interested in justice, law, and the practical realities of life.

I’d much rather someone be straight with me than drown me in banalities.

Dana Healy writes:

Last Friday, I knocked off early from work and headed to the multiplex to catch The Pacifier. Sure enough, as soon as the lights go out, a pack of Jews waltzes in and plunks down right in front of me! All through the first preview, they had to have a Jewish debate about where to put their coats and who should hold the Twizzlers. What’s wrong with these idiots? If you want to chat, go to a coffee shop, or that Jewish community center down on Cavendish Avenue.

Where did these people learn to whisper? An Israeli helicopter?

I sure didn’t pay $10 to listen to a group of twits talk back to the screen like those obnoxious Jewish robots from Mystery Science Theater 3000! And apparently, “God’s chosen people” weren’t selected based on their ability to follow plotlines. No wonder they wandered the desert for so many years—they can’t even watch a Vin Diesel movie without getting lost.

Posted in Christianity, Jews | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Jewish Manners

I Love My Judaism, She Loves Her Jesus

How often do you hear Jews talk about how much they love God?

Almost never. Jews instead say things like, “I love Torah”, or “I love Yiddishkeit” or “I love Judaism” or “I love Israel” or “I love Jews.”

Christians, by contrast, never say, “I love Christianity.” Instead, Christians love Jesus. They love their Lord and Savior.

I heard this observation in one of Dennis Prager’s lectures on Leviticus.

Posted in Christianity, Jews | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on I Love My Judaism, She Loves Her Jesus

The Moshav Band Plays The Happy Minyan Saturday Night

I heard the crowd got so excited that they started throwing their sheitels on stage.

A friend says: “A group of women started dancing together and the men rushed out with a makeshift mechitza to put around them. I was dying.”

Happy Minyan Moshav Band

The Happy Minyan consistently boasts the best davening in town!

Posted in Happy Minyan, Moshav Band | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The Moshav Band Plays The Happy Minyan Saturday Night

JJ: A Jewish Apology to the World

So I came across this headline in the latest Jewish Journal.

I couldn’t believe it. A Jewish apology to the world? For what?

I had to read on.

The article was by Rabbi Shmuly Yanklowitz, founder of Uri L’Tzedek.

He writes: “First, we owe an apology to all those who have suffered losses from our most recent scandals involving billions of philanthropic dollars. It has been shown that Jewish nonprofits are far behind non-Jewish nonprofits in public transparency, making it possible for a Ponzi scheme to emerge from within our midst.”

It has been shown by whom? The rabbi names no source. He just uses the passive voice as though his statement is self-evident. But is it self-evident? Is the rabbi an expert in non-profit transparency?

I don’t understand why Jews collectively should apologize for a tiny number of its group who are swindlers.

Can you imagine somebody writing an op/ed that American blacks owe a collective apology to the world for their community’s high rates of criminal violence, welfare dependency and illegitimate births? Such a request would be greeted with outrage.

Why shouldn’t this op/ed also be greeted with outrage? Why is it only OK to write this sort of thing about Jews?

Rabbi Yanklowitz writes: “Further, it is now clear that Agriprocessors — the former Iowa kosher meatpacking firm raided in 2008 for illegal practices — and countless other Jewish-owned companies have oppressed their workers, creating a problem that is now pervasive throughout our community. We owe an apology to the Guatemalan people and to a spate of other countries whose people have been abused in American Jewish factories while producing kosher products that we blindly consumed. We also owe an apology to some of the poorest tenants in buildings owned by Jewish landlords, who have often suffered exorbitant rent hikes, winters without heat and have been made victims of gentrification.”

I am unaware of anybody being forced to work for Agriprocessors. All its workers chose to work there voluntarily. None of them were held hostage at the point of a gun. All were free to leave any time. So too with tenants of so-called slumlords. They are free to leave at any time for a better deal.

When Agriprocessors shut down, did the lot of these illegal immmigrants improve? Were there abundant and high-paying and safe working opportunities elsewhere in the country? If so, why didn’t they take those jobs instead of working at Agriprocessors?

You can’t compare Jews to a mythically perfect standard. You can’t compare Agriprocessors to a perfect workplace that only occurs in dreams? You have to compare Jews and Agriprocessors to the alternatives. Everyone who worked at Agriprocessors considered that working there was a better deal than their alternatives.

How have Jewish-owned companies oppressed their workers? The rabbi presents no evidence that any of these workers were kidnapped and forced to work in slavery? Instead, they were all free to refuse their jobs, and once they took them, they could leave at any time.

If this is oppression, then the world is better off with more oppression. I guess for the rabbi, “oppression” means “opportunities with downsides.” But all opportunities have downsides. Every job, every person, is a blessing and a curse.

There’s nobody in your life who’s only a blessing and there’s no job you’ve ever held that was only a curse. Everyone and every job is a mixed bag. So long as people choose freely without physical coercion there is no oppression.

Rabbi Shmuly Yanklowitz writes: “On a global front, Israel has sometimes treated its minorities or neighbors without the full dignity they deserve. Additionally, only 65 years after the Holocaust, we have not done enough to try to stop the genocides in Darfur, the Congo and other countries around the world. And despite years spent studying the Bible and its imperative to care for the poor, we still have not become world leaders in alleviating poverty.”

Compared to whom have we done so poorly? What other tiny nation fighting for its survival has treated its minorities and neighbors with more dignity? Which group has done more than Jews to fight genocide in Darfur and the Congo? Which group has done more to alleviate poverty than the Jews?

Judging by this interview, Rabbi Yanklowitz is a big believer in “social justice.” Why doesn’t he just say “justice”? Because “social justice” is a code word for socialism, for top-down rule by enlightened elites such as the holy rabbi.

What does it say about the Jewish Journal that would choose to publish such a piece? Can you imagine them publishing such essays about other groups, such as blacks or gays?

Posted in Agriprocessors, Jewish Journal, R. Shmuly Yanklowitz | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on JJ: A Jewish Apology to the World

Barack Obama’s Marriage Kaput?

I’ve noticed various stories on the Drudge Report over the past couple of months that indicate the president’s marriage is in trouble.

This past week, I saw:

White House reporters abuzz over wedding ring-less president...

'It's getting repaired'...

On January 29, 2007, I reported on the failed marriage of Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa:

The mayor and his wife Corina haven’t been seen together in public in about ten months (since the president of Mexico, Vicente Fox, visited in May 2006). Villaraigosa no longer wears his wedding band (not since the first week of September 2006). His wife does not live with him in the mayor’s mansion (I don’t think she’s ever lived there with him).

“So, will he be reverting to his maiden name?” asks one internet commenter.

Connie was recently spotted cleaning the couple’s home at Mt. Washington.

Around 2:30 p.m. Friday, Jan. 26, a journalist at City Hall finally worked up the courage to ask Villaraigosa after his press conference, “Where is your wedding ring? What’s the deal?”

The mayor said that he had lost weight and hadn’t had the time to have it resized. The mayor said he was still together with his wife Connie.

Journalists from The Los Angeles Times, L.A. Daily News, and City News were around the mayor at this time but nobody bothered to report the matter.

I’ll admit that I’m highly skeptical of the White House’s claims that the president is getting his wedding ring “repaired.”

It reminds me too much of what happened with L.A.’s mayor in 2007.

I can’t remember any skeptical reporting in the MSM about Barack Obama’s marriage. They’re eager to buy into the dream.

I noticed that Michelle went off on a big fancy vacation to Spain a few weeks ago without the president. I can’t believe he was too happy with all the awful publicity she brought him.

Michelle Obama also spent her last birthday without the president’s company (this was noted on the Drudge Report).

Report:

US President Barack Obama has reportedly not been wearing his wedding ring for quite some time now. The reason – it has been sent for repair.

For at least two days, Obama’s left hand was unadorned by his wedding band. The White House later said the president’s intricate gold ring, made in Indonesia, needed a little repair, the ABC reported.

It, however, declined to elaborate on what was wrong with the ring.

Obama married Michelle Robinson Oct 3, 1992.

The first lady has also left her wedding ring at home on many occasions.

But it seems her reason may have to do with fashion. While attending the ball on the night of her husband’s inauguration, Michelle ditched her engagement ring and wedding band and opted instead for a large silver cocktail ring that matched her earrings.

Recently, she was again seen without her wedding ring while attending a White House party honouring Broadway music.

The National Enquirer reports:

Michelle Obama – cracking under the pressure of being First Lady – is drinking way more than she should, friends fear.

Longtime pals have been keeping a close eye on her White House booze intake for months, sources told The ENQUIRER, and her husband President Barack Obama even stepped in when she recently consumed too much alcohol.

“When Barack saw Michelle drink more than she should at a recent dinner, he hit the roof. He told her, ‘This is NOT going to turn into a problem!'” a close source told The ENQUIRER.

“Barack is overly sensitive to the issue because of his own past drinking and substance abuse problems. But he also feels guilty because of the pictures taken of him drinking beer at an NBA game recently.”

The President also feels he may have contributed to his wife’s alcohol issues by not stopping her from overindulging during their date night in New York City on May 30.

Michelle, 45, knocked back “a glass or two of champagne” while the couple flew to the Big Apple on a private jet, according to the close source, and published reports said she downed two martinis during dinner at the Greenwich Village restaurant Blue Hill.

“It was clear that Mrs. Obama was having a VERY good time,” a restaurant employee told The ENQUIRER.

“There’s a real fear that she may be drinking more than she should as a result of the pressures that come along with being First Lady,” an insider divulged.

Here’s a report from August, 2010:

We are loathe to report this kind of slanderous story but the National Enquirer and Globe are making some very disturbing allegations about President Obama, a woman named Vera Baker, and, well, the state of his marriage to Michelle Obama. The only reason we didn’t dismiss it outright is because the Enquirer was the one who broke the John Edwards/Rielle Hunter story. At first, like the rest of the country, we didn’t believe them with that one. We dismissed it all as slanderous lies. But it turns out the whole thing was true. Now, this. Can we trust the journalistic integrity of the National Enquirer? Or do we follow our instincts and dismiss this whole thing as slanderous lies? And is it relevant that their story goes back to 2004?

<

From the Orlando Sentinel July 2, 2009:

You don’t think the Obamas need those dates, like the trip to Broadway last week? Think again.

The couple’s marriage once was deeply troubled, author Richard Wolffe tells “Inside Edition.” The interview airs at 4:30 and 7:30 today on WKMG-Channel 6.

“Until recently, there were more downs than ups” in the marriage, says Wolffe. He is the author of “Renegade: The Making of a President.”

The marriage showed trouble in 2000 because of politics. “He has been open about this,” Wolffe says. “That he says there was little romance [in the marriage]. There was lots of tension.”

In 2000, when Obama ran for the U.S. House of Representatives, Barack thought was Michelle was “being cold,” and she thought he was “being selfish,” Wolffe says.

Here’s a National Enquirer cover from April 2008:

Posted in Antonio Villaraigosa, Barack Obama | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Barack Obama’s Marriage Kaput?

Alexander Technique Brings Me Tranquility At The Shabbos Table

I have Shabbos lunch with friends. I’ve known them for about a decade but haven’t been to their home in a year.

“What’s the matter, Luke?” asks the hostess at the end of the meal. “You haven’t said anything inappropriate all meal? We even have two single women here.”

I’m usually the king of inappropriate. At previous Shabbos meals, I’ve asked Jewish women in law school whether such an education encourages traits in the Jewess that would be better off discouraged.

I’ve also asked them their opinion of Philip Roth’s unparalleled insights into the Jewish woman.

During Succoth, I’ve asked them if they’d like to come back to my place and shake my lulav.

“Two years of Alexander Technique,” I say today. “I used to be easily triggered. I was stuck in startle response and when I’d get a stimuli, I’d go into fight or flight. My habitual reactions didn’t serve me well. I could shut up with great effort or I could interact from a disturbed place. Those were my choices. Because my head-neck relationship was disturbed, my whole self was disturbed. Now I’ve found freedom and poise.”

When I was a kid, people said I looked like a Holocaust survivor. I was that depressed.

I’ve been a bit off since then in the way I relate to myself and to others.

Even after years of therapy, I was still making inappropriate remarks on a regular basis.

Even after decades of God and Torah, I was still a shmuck.

I was locked and loaded in my body, just a gun waiting to go off.

People these days ask me if I’m tranquil because I’m more religious or because of the beard and the responsibility of representing Judaism to the world or is it the psycho-therapy or am I just getting older, perhaps I’m maturing at long last? Well, maybe all these helped, but the main thing that has changed me (and taken most of my money!) the past two years has been Alexander Technique.

I’ve learned to let go of the some of the unhelpful ways I’ve traditionally responded to life. I’m not stuck in a 24/7 pattern of fight or flight. I’m not compressing myself as much, not shoving all my organs and frustrations together in a downward cycle of needless tension and reduced functioning. Because I am more competent and graceful with the tasks of daily life, I’m not as angry with myself and with others. I’m not as frustrated with my body and with my life and I’m not as needy for cheap thrills and instant releases.

I feel more tranquil these days. I had many opportunities to feel ill at ease over Rosh Hashanah, but I kept telling myself to allow my neck to be free so my head could release forward and up, so I could let go of my tendency to hunch my shoulders and to instead think them out wide to the sides and to think of my back lengthening and widening while I considered my arms emerging from my back and their length down to my elbows and from there to my hands and then to my fingers, letting them uncurl out of my formerly locked fists.

Because I am more at ease with myself, I pick fewer fights and don’t need my fists as much.

I’m OK with myself. I’m OK with the way I walk and talk, sit and stand, blog and blunder. I no longer compress myself as much when I feel awkward and hence my feelings of dis-ease are reduced. I rarely stiffen my neck these days and thereby cramp my entire body (there are more joints in your neck than any other part of your body, hence if you tighten there, you will wrap your body in an ever-tightening straight-jacket of bad habits).

I’ve learned to let go of the layers of unnecessary tension that cramped me for decades. I have a little more length and width these days, and with it more freedom and poise, peace and joy.

“Would you like me to thank my Alexander Technique teachers for you?” I asked today. “Am I easier to host and to have around?”

“Yes!” responded the table in one giant chorus.

Chaim Amalek emails: Which has helped Luke more in life? Judaism, or Alexander technique? The impression left by Luke’s writings since discovering the latter is that Alexander technique has helped a lot more than has obedience to the rabbinate. Which leads to this obvious question:: Luke, if you had discovered Alexander Technique before coming across Dennis Prager, would you still have become an orthodox Jew? One imagines you instead a successful journalist, his opinions sought after by others, and his posture and breathing always correct.

Posted in Alexander Technique, Personal | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Alexander Technique Brings Me Tranquility At The Shabbos Table

Do Jews Need Orthodoxy To Survive?

In a 2001 lecture on Numbers 30-31, Dennis Prager says: The purpose to continuing Judaism is to touch humanity with God’s message, but if you separate yourself from humanity, how do you bring God’s message to it?

How does a Jew touch humanity and stay within the Torah-based system of observance? It is almost not doable if one stays within Orthodox observance. There are exceptional individuals who have immersed in that system and yet interrelate with humanity, but it is almost impossible.

The Orthodox have going for them the argument that every attempt at non-Orthodoxy has failed. And continues to fail. Jews have not been able to persevere as Jews outside of Orthodoxy because of assimilation. Do Jews need, by virtue of their small numbers, a system of separation? I vote no but I have no evidence to support my claim.

A self-imposed obligation is co-equal according to the Torah to one imposed by God. If you take an oath to God of self-imposition, it is as if God instructed you to do so.

We have a subtle message from the Torah here discouraging people from taking on more religious obligations than God gave them. The Torah doesn’t want you to take vows. That’s why the punishment is so severe.

My proof text is the laws of the Nazirite, a person who takes on extra obligations and then has to bring a sin offering. You are considered to have sinned against God by taking on these obligations.

The Torah does not permit you to add or to subtract from the laws I taught you. The Torah does not want you to be super-religious.

Posted in Dennis Prager, Orthodoxy | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Do Jews Need Orthodoxy To Survive?