Jewish Unity

Dr. Jonathan D. Sarna writes:

First, we must acknowledge the role American Jewish religious movements play in focusing more on what unites Jews than what divides them. Communal concern over “continuity,” the reluctance of wealthy donors to support those who promote Jewish divisiveness, and a strong desire among young Jews to move beyond denominational labels have resulted in an increased focus on the importance of just getting along. A revealing indicator of this trend was the first-ever North American Jewish Day School Leadership Conference, a collaboration among Reform, Conservative, Orthodox, and community day schools held earlier this year. Organizers cited it as proof “that working across ideologies is possible and desirable.”

Second—and perhaps not unrelated—the Israeli chief rabbinate, whom the conversion bill would have empowered, has become deeply unpopular in American Jewish circles, even among many Orthodox rabbis. The politicization of the chief rabbinate, its unwholesome ties to Israeli politics, and its unwelcome intrusion into American Jewish religious life, granting recognition to some rabbis and denying it to others, has cost the chief rabbinate dearly. American Jews have come to appreciate the wisdom of a religious free market, where religion is separated from the state, no chief rabbinate exists, and rabbis are free to make religious decisions based on their own best judgment and conscience. The vast majority of American Jews would not advocate for a chief rabbinate in the United States, and they are understandably disinclined to increase the chief rabbinate’s power in Israel.

Finally, the past decade’s focus on community-wide adult Jewish education has promoted much greater public unity among Jews. Transdenominational adult Jewish education programs, such as Melton Mini-School, Wexner Heritage, Me’ah, and now Limmud, as well as Orthodox educational outreach programs sponsored by Chabad, Aish HaTorah, and an array of so-called community kollelim, liberally extend the welcome mat to all self-identifying Jews, including, inevitably, non-Orthodox converts to Judaism and patrilineal Jews, whom the Reform and Reconstructionist movements recognize as Jews on the basis of their Jewish fathers and their identification with the Jewish religion.

Posted in Jonathan D. Sarna | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Jewish Unity

You Can Believe In God And Be An SOB

In a 2001 lecture on Numbers 22-23, Dennis Prager says: Balaam goes on with Balak’s dignitaries. Balaam tells Balak I can only say that God tells me.

It is possible to believe in God and wish that God will allow you to do what God does not want. It is possible to believe in God and to hope that God will forgive you.

If belief in God ensured that you did the right thing then every believer would be a saint. Not true.

While belief in God is no guarantee that you will overcome your desires, only God will help many to overcome their desires.

Posted in Dennis Prager, Torah | Comments Off on You Can Believe In God And Be An SOB

I Made ‘Technology Review’

Chaim Amalek emails: What? This is a fairly high-brow title. There is a piece in the Sept Oct issue by Scott Fayner on so-called “tube” sites, bemoaning the fall in revenue due to free sites that stream content that a proper torah Jew like the two of you ought not contemplate on any day, let alone on these days. Money shot info: in 2004 a female earned $900 per scene that now fetches $600 (males fell from $500 to $300). Fred — has the price of patent work fallen by a similar amount?

Here’s the best part, the end note: “Scott Fayner ran the poular gossip site Lukeford.com. Today he publishes a monthly online magazine dedicated to Boston dogs called Massarf.” Sort of, but so Luke Ford — forever associated with the dogs in google space. And no, I was not able to find a link to this online. Technology Review makes you pay for content.

Posted in Internet | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on I Made ‘Technology Review’

Illegal Immigration

From CIS.org:

1. Backgrounder: Birthright Citizenship in the United States: A Global Comparison
2. Video: Mark Krikorian Discusses Illegal Immigration on FOX News
3. Blog: The Uses and Abuses of the Asylum System
4. Blog: Behind the Pew Study on Illegal Immigration, Part II: How Many Illegals?
5. Blog: ‘Machete’ Splashing Its Gore on a Movie Screen Near You
6. Blog: A Right to Immigrate?
7. Blog: Behind the Pew Study on Illegal Immigration, Part I: First the ‘Good’ News
8. Blog: ICE Caving on Secure Communities
9. Blog: TRAC Study Mirrors Pew’s – Aliens Less Interested in the U.S. Than Before
10. Blog: Jorge Castaneda Blames U.S. for Migrant Massacre
11. Blog: If Pew Says It, It Must Be True!
12. Blog: DHS Issues Dark, Mixed Message to Pregnant Foreign Visitors
13. Blog: From Sanctuary to Safer City
14. Blog: Mexico’s Elite Emigration
15. Blog: Abuse of Migrants Gets More Attention in Mexico

— Mark Krikorian]

1.
Birthright Citizenship in the United States: A Global Comparison
By Jon Feere
CIS Backgrounder, August 2010
http://www.cis.org/birthright-citizenship

Excerpt: This Backgrounder briefly explains some policy concerns that result from an expansive application of the Citizenship Clause, highlights recent legislative efforts to change the policy, provides a historical overview of the development of the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, and includes a discussion of how other countries approach birthright citizenship. The paper concludes that Congress should clarify the scope of the Citizenship Clause and promote a serious discussion on whether the United States should automatically confer the benefits and burdens of U.S. citizenship on the children of aliens whose presence is temporary or illegal.

2.
Mark Krikorian Discusses Declining Illegal Population
FOX News, September 3, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/user/CISORG#p/u/0/SYcGxYLz5Vk

3.
The Uses and Abuses of the Asylum System
By David North
CIS Blog, September 6, 2010
http://www.cis.org/North/AsylumUsesandAbuses

Excerpt: The recent release of data on the immigration judges’ asylum decisions by the TRAC system reminded me of the uses and abuses of the asylum process, an interesting but relatively minor part of the immigration system.

These data also cast some light on our role in Iraq, as noted below.

4.
Behind the Pew Study on Illegal Immigration, Part II: How Many Illegals?
By Stanley Renshon
CIS Blog, September 5, 2010
http://www.cis.org/renshon/behind-pew-study-2

Excerpt: The recently released Pew report on the decline of the illegal population in the United States has garnered a lot of attention, though a great deal of it for the wrong reasons. Obama administration officials are already touting their policies to account for the decline. A DHS spokesman went even further, saying that ‘the downward trend in border crossings has continued since Obama took office in January 2009, citing Homeland Security statistics that show decreases in illegal-immigrant apprehensions during the past two years’ (emphasis mine).

5.
‘Machete’ Splashing Its Gore on a Movie Screen Near You
By Jerry Kammer
CIS Blog, September 3, 2010
http://www.cis.org/kammer/machete-reviews

Excerpt: The New York Times says it’s ‘conveniently timed to sprinkle gasoline on the fires of the immigration debate.’ Get ready for some talk-show rumbling as ‘Machete’ splashes its gore across movie screens starting this weekend. Here are excerpts from five reviews:

6.
A Right to Immigrate?
By Steven Camarota
CIS Blog, September 3, 2010
http://www.cis.org/Camarota/a-right-to-immigrate

Excerpt: I recently came across a paper by University of Colorado philosophy professor Michael Huemer entitled ‘Is There a Right to Immigrate?’ Huemer’s answer is clearly ‘yes,’ there is such a right. By a ‘right to immigrate’ he means the right to enter another country of one’s choosing, rather than just a right to leave one’s country. While only a tiny share of the American people would agree with Mr. Huemer, such people constitute a large share of immigration thinkers on the far left and the libertarian right. Although generally not part of the public immigration debate – few if any actual elected office holders imagine a ‘right’ to enter our country – many advocates of high immigration seem to either privately agree with Huemer or at least strongly sympathize with his position. Thus, his perspective is important, even if it is not currently discussed openly outside of academia circles. Below I list some of my objections to his formation, in no particular ! order.

7.
Behind the Pew Study on Illegal Immigration, Part I: First the ‘Good’ News
By Stanley Renshon
CIS Blog, September 3, 2010
http://www.cis.org/renshon/behind-pew-study-1

Excerpt: The new report from the Pew Hispanic Center is certain to be widely discussed and widely misunderstood. The report delivers the conclusion most likely to be quoted in its title, ‘U.S. Unauthorized Immigration Flows Are Down Sharply Since Mid-Decade.’

8.
ICE Caving on Secure Communities
By Jessica Vaughan
CIS Blog, September 2, 2010
http://www.cis.org/vaughan/caving-on-secure-communities

Excerpt: The San Francisco Chronicle reported today that ICE is going all wobbly in defending Secure Communities, its marquee program for identifying and removing criminal aliens.

Secure Communities ought to be one of the most uncontroversial enforcement programs ever launched. It provides for the fingerprints of all those booked into county jails to be screened against immigration databases as part of the same process by which they are screened against other criminal history databases. Launched officially in 2008, so far it has found nearly 300,000 criminal aliens, including 43,000 very serious offenders. It is in more than 500 counties nationwide. Because it is based on fingerprints, criminal aliens cannot escape detection by using aliases or by claiming U.S. citizenship. It eliminates the need for local officers to make separate, manual requests to check an inmate’s immigration status, and provides for automatic notification to the local ICE office, so they can take custody of the criminal aliens and remove them at the appropriate time. There is no cost and no additional work for the local agencies. Everyone is screened, so there is no possibil! ity of discrimination

9.
TRAC Study Mirrors Pew’s – Aliens Less Interested in the U.S. Than Before
By David North
CIS Blog, September 2, 2010
http://www.cis.org/north/TRAC-asylum-data

Excerpt: It was probably a coincidence, but two quite different studies of alien populations were issued within 24 hours of each other, each showing that migrants appear to be less interested in the U.S. than formerly.

The more numerically significant of the two, the report of the Pew Hispanic Center, as noted in a posting by Mark Krikorian, estimated that the number of illegal aliens in the country had dropped to 11.1 million from 12.0 million two years earlier. That’s a decrease, over two years, of 7.5 percent.

10.
Jorge Castaneda Blames U.S. for Migrant Massacre
By Jerry Kammer
CIS Blog, September 2, 2010
http://www.cis.org/kammer/castaneda-migrant-massacre

Excerpt: That’s the provocative headline of today’s column in the Mexican daily Reforma by Jorge Castaneda, who as Mexico’s foreign secretary from 2000 to 2003 pushed the Bush administration to pass ‘comprehensive immigration reform’ legislation. He is now Global Distinguished Professor of Politics and Latin American and Caribbean Studies at New York University.

11.
If Pew Says It, It Must Be True!
By Mark Krikorian
CIS Blog, September 2, 2010
http://www.cis.org/krikorian/pew-illegals-estimate

Excerpt: A slew of news stories today about a new report from the Pew Hispanic Center estimating that as of March 2009, the illegal population had dropped to 11.1 million. Pew, though institutionally inclined toward amnesty and mass immigration, does honest work, and this is no exception. But many of the press reports are treating this as momentous, previously unknown news when, in fact, it’s already been reported — twice.

12.
DHS Issues Dark, Mixed Message to Pregnant Foreign Visitors
By David North
CIS Blog, September 1, 2010
http://www.cis.org/north/pregnant-visitors

Excerpt: An arm of the Department of Homeland Security is apparently paying some subdued, indirect attention to the 14th Amendment controversy – should ‘anchor babies’ be allowed, as they are now, to become citizens at birth?

It has issued a somber message to pregnant alien women thinking about coming to this country. (For more on the birthright citizenship controversy see the new Backgrounder by my colleague Jon Feere.)

13.
From Sanctuary to Safer City
By Jessica Vaughan
CIS Blog, August 31, 2010
http://www.cis.org/vaughan/from-sanctuary-to-safer-city

Excerpt: The police union in Houston, a former sanctuary city, is taking a look at the experience of Phoenix, which two years ago implemented a policy to allow its officers to call ICE to report suspected illegal aliens who were connected to other crimes. The implementation of this policy, which is similar to the one signed into law by Arizona governor Jan Brewer and later blocked by U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton in response to a Justice Department lawsuit, has contributed to a steady decline in violent and property crime rates in Phoenix, without generating a single complaint of civil rights violations or racial profiling, according to officer Mark Spencer. Spencer is president of the Phoenix police union and recently gave a presentation to officers in Houston.

14.
Mexico’s Elite Emigration
By Jerry Kammer
CIS Blog, August 31, 2010
http://www.cis.org/kammer/mexicos-elite-emigration

Excerpt: ‘A new form of migration much more elitist and selective, but migration in the end, has been taking place for months in various zones in the north of the country, especially the border states,’ writes columnist Salvador Garcia Soto in today’s edition of the Mexican daily El Universal. ‘The narco violence, the lack of security, and the misgovernment in these places is pushing out entire families of Mexicans who have changed their residence and their activities to various cities of the United States.’

15.
Abuse of Migrants Gets More Attention in Mexico
By Jerry Kammer
CIS Blog, August 30, 2010
http://www.cis.org/kammer/abuse-of-migrants

Excerpt: The often brutal mistreatment suffered by Central American migrants passing through Mexico on their way to the United States is receiving increased attention in that country following the discovery last week of the bodies of 72 migrants who had been gunned down. The victims were reportedly murdered by one of the criminal gangs involved in the trafficking of both drugs and human beings.

Posted in Immigration | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Illegal Immigration

The Party Of Hate

From DennisPrager.com:

Prager H1: Why has the media given so much attention to the loony Rev in Florida who wants to have a Koran burning party? If they ignored him, he’d be a non-issue. But the media glare has made it a major story… A man defends his home and his family from a gang, thanks to his trusty AK-47. He gets arrested for his pains… Los Angeles names a high school after Al Gore… Global warming update: glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica are melting at half the predicted rate… Dennis talks to Phil Kerpen, VP of Policy for Americans for Prosperity about the Winning in November campaign as well as the danger of state-based cap and trade… The imam of the GZ mosque project is pushing ahead in a sweetly worded opinion piece in the NY Times. Never mind that most Americans and New Yorkers.

H2: Male/Female Relationship: The Relationship Trinity
Prager H2: Brain, Heart and Sex Drive: the three elements that make up a successful relationship. Dennis explains. Callers offer their theories and experiences.

H3: The Party of Hatred
Prager H3: Howard Dean says the Republican Party is the party of hatred. Dan Harris of Good Morning, America conflates the Koran burning reverend and Sarah Palin. The creator of the Daily Kos asserts that conservatives are anti-woman, anti-gay and anti-education among his litany of charges. Who are the haters again? Those on the Left or the Right?.. Dennis reflects on Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year which begins tonight.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Party Of Hate

Latest Torah Talk Response

Greg Leake writes: Hi Luke,

Another great session with ZZ Top and the Spaceman.

The Torah Corral was a funny bit and so was the list of 10 pejorative things to say about Luke. Cruel, but amusing nonetheless.

Quite a period of this week’s talks dwelt on the idea of a Jew having a hamburger from the point of view of the Torah. I’m pleased to see that Judaism is not lying down on the crucial subjects of our day.

Let me give the goy’s reaction to a Jew walking into a hamburger joint.
1. Absolute indifference.
2. Look at the guy in the funny suit. Wonder if he’s in a band?

And for the one out of a thousand who actually knows some small amount about Judaism,
3. Hey, a Jew eating a hamburger. At least he’s got some sense.

I think this summarizes the average goy’s reaction fairly well.

I appreciate Rabbi Rabbs actually saying something sympathetic about Christian conservatives. I don’t seem to recall him singling out this group in a positive way previously.

However, I wanted to remind you both that Christianity is essentially a Jewish in-house creation. If the Christian world is unsettling, you have no one to blame but yourselves. Naturally, Jesus bin Joseph was a Jew and so were all of his disciples. These men all came from Jewish families. In fact, Jesus’s brother James and his group of fellow travelers all spent the entirety of their lives as observant Jews. They were so indistinguishable from the Jewish community that it wasn’t until they were elderly that authorities came to them and asked if they really believed this stuff about Jesus. Finally, after a lifetime of being observant, the authorities felt there was some reason to question them. Then, of course, there were some beheadings… religion being what it is and all.

It wasn’t until Paul the Apostle came along and received a revelation from Jesus that this religion began to be spread to a wider audience. As a consequence, Christianity in its origin is completely a Jewish in-house construction, originated, founded, and practiced by observant Jews. As a consequence if Christianity produces some discomfort in the Jewish world, it is something that you will simply have to take responsibility for.

I also would like to mention that although Judaism constantly references itself in contradistinction to Christianity, this is somewhat behind the times. Today all the religions that used to be exotic and far-flung are part of the fabric of American life. In California, I would not be surprised if there were as many Buddhists as Jews. My doctor is a Sikh from the Punjab, and I know people who go to receive acupuncture from someone whose background is Japanese Shintoism. I drive past a Hindu temple almost every day.

So frankly, my feeling is the constant contrast between Judaism and Christianity is short-sighted in light of the religious mixture alive in the Western world today. Lord knows that Islam is, regrettably, a rapidly growing religion in the US. And when you get down to it, Christianity tends to see Judaism in a favorable light, and some Christian ministers are fervent supporters of a variety of Jewish causes. All of which suggests to me that there are a lot more urgent religions to contrast Judaism with than staid old Christianity.

LUKE SAYS: I have some thoughts on the ideas in this email.

* About the absolute indifference Greg would feel about an observant Jew dressed in Jewish garb eating a non-kosher hamburger at McDonalds. Greg is saying it does not matter what you eat. But we know it does matter what you eat. Certain foods are good for you and certain food are not.

More than at any time in history, I believe, we are a nation of finicky eaters who often pay tremendous attention to what they eat.

The idea that what you eat does not matter is ludicrous. It clearly has profound implications for your health. Why should it not also have profound implications for your sense of self and your morality? If you are disciplined about what you eat, you are more likely to be disciplined in other areas of your life. If you desist from eating food slaughtered in a cruel fashion, you are less likely to be cruel in the rest of life.

How can anyone seriously argue that you should not take God into account when you eat? Even Christians with their contempt for Jewish law believe in saying grace before meals. That’s a ritual. That’s a way of bringing God into their meals.

I have another point about your indifference to an observant Jew betraying his way of life with what he eats. I find that non-Jews have much more respect for you when follow your own tradition than when you trash it. When you know where someone is coming from, it is easier to deal with him. If somebody is rootless and has no discernible identity, it is troubling. Think how weirded out you feel when you can’t tell whether somebody is male or female.

It’s weird when you see an observant Hindu eat a hamburger. It’s weird when you see an observant Muslim eat pig. It’s weird when you see an observant Jew enter a strip club. It’s weird when you see a woman use a men’s room. It’s weird when you see a kid publicly correct and embarrass his parent. It’s weird when you see an employee tell a boss to “f*** off.”

Our brains crave order in the universe and these actions upend that order and create chaos.

So yes, what you eat is important. It says a lot about you.

The only way you can be truly indifferent about how others behave and dress is if you don’t give a damn about them, yourself, and society.

We know from history and from the world around us that what Jews eat and won’t eat is frequently not regarded with indifference. When you say “Jew”, people don’t yawn, notes Dennis Prager. “Jew” is such a charged word that many Jews and non-Jews don’t even use it. They’ll say “Jewish person.” Few people say “Christian person” or “Muslim person.”

“Jews” are a charged subject and part of what distinguishes Jews from non-Jews and hence makes people nervous are the Jewish dietary laws. These laws make it impossible for an observant Jew to eat in a non-kosher restaurant and at the home of somebody who is not observant of Jewish law. I haven’t found that the following statement are a matter of general indifference — I can’t eat at your home, I can’t drink at your home, I can’t eat at your favorite restaurants.

* Greg writes: “Look at the guy in the funny suit. Wonder if he’s in a band?”

Greg says it doesn’t matter what you wear. It is a matter of indifference to him. But we’ve already established that “Jews” are a charged matter. The last year we have for hate crimes in the U.S. is 2008. These statistics show that about 66% of hate crimes for religion were committed against Jews.

A Jew who dresses in an identifiably Jewish way and who refuses to eat non-kosher food is standing out from the crowd and marching to the beat of his own drummer. He appears to put God first in his life. By every statistic we have, observant Jews lead higher quality lives. Thus Jews challenge the laws, national identities, gods and mores of the goyim. This is something the goyim (and non-observant Jews) rarely react to with indifference.

As someone who dresses in a distinctively Jewish way and used to dress in an indistinguishable way from the goyim, I can say with confidence that what you wear makes a profound difference in the way people relate to you. If it didn’t, why wouldn’t people wear shorts to the Oscars or to see the Queen of England? Why do the best private schools generally require uniforms? Uniforms help create a cohesive identity.

* Greg writes: “I wanted to remind you both that Christianity is essentially a Jewish in-house creation. If the Christian world is unsettling, you have no one to blame but yourselves.”

That Christianity came from Jews is no more significant to the Jewish religion than that Islam came from the Jews and that feminism, socialism, communism, the labor movement, the peace movement, the environmentalist movement also came disproportionately from Jews. What Jews create is not necessarily compatible with Judaism.

Greg writes: “As a consequence if Christianity produces some discomfort in the Jewish world, it is something that you will simply have to take responsibility for.”

Why? I don’t take responsibility for communism. It is completely incompatible with Judaism as is Christianity (for a Jew to adopt). Christianity was created 2,000 years ago. No Jew alive today bears responsibility for that.

Greg writes: “I also would like to mention that although Judaism constantly references itself in contradistinction to Christianity, this is somewhat behind the times.”

As Judaism is the only ancient culture still in tact today, the way that Jews have learned to relate to the majority culture (which has been Christian for the past 2,000 in the Western world) has been effective and proper. Until the creation of the modern state of Israel, most Jews have lived for the past 2600 years as a minority and thus to preserve their own identity they have learned to make sharp distinctions when necessary with the majority culture. This is a practice that other minority groups who want to preserve themselves should adopt or they will disappear.

While there are many other religions in the United States aside from Christianity, none of them have similar levels of power and influence. Also, I have no comparable expertise in them as I have in Christianity (growing up as the son of a Christian evangelist and theologian who was required to study hundreds of books of Christian apologetics).

RABBI RABBS EMAILS: I might point out that last week, Greg wrote that “Goys do not wear uniforms. We simply dress for comfort and fashion.”

What he wrote is of itself a fashion statement. Dressing for comfort and fashion is the uniform of the Goyim as opposed to the uniform of Jewish wear. Jews don’t place comfort and fashion first, we place dressing Jewish first.

Goyim make fashion their priority. When a Jew dresses that way, they are emulating the Goyim, wearing Goyishe clothes, and trying to blend in with the Goyim. That actually is a good thing to do when eating non-kosher food at a Goyishe restaurant. But, in general, it has never served the Jews well to try to blend in. Jews don’t blend. We make lousy Goyim.

GREG LEAKE RESPONDS:

Hi Luke, Hi Rabbi Rabbs,
I’m flattered that both of you felt a desire to respond to my post. Rabbs, I hope you’re out surfing today as you suggested on the Torah talks. I’ve had similar experiences while being alone in the ocean. You had better be careful — you might have the nascent makeup of a mystic.

Rabbi Rabbs — LOL
If only we had a little more uniformity in dress in the Gentile world. You live in LA, so you cannot have avoided seeing these chicks with tattoos on every square inch of their bodies, piercings through their faces and ears and even unmentionable places.. some kind of insane piercing through their tongues. Recently Sandra Bullock divorced her husband because he was fooling around with this chick who modeled for biker magazines. Have you seen pictures of her? She looks like some kind of snake. If I were single and found her in my bed I would run screaming into the street.

Anyhow, the word uniform implies uniformity, and you guys are the ones with uniformity in dress. If you can look at one guy walking down the street in an Armani suit and another guy with an orange-spiked mohawk and call that uniformity, then G-d bless you. Just don’t think you’re ever going to get any Gentiles to understand your position.

Luke
I don’t regard hamburgers as unhealthy.

When we are in a New York style deli, Jews do not seem to regard us as unusual. I don’t see anything amiss with a Jew having a hamburger. I realize that you do. But I’m not a Jew. If I’m ever in LA, I’ll invite you guys to dinner. I presume it would be at a kosher restaurant. I hope the Jewish patronage would not freak out over a goy sitting in their establishment. Should you ever be in Texas, I would advise dropping the costuming, and I could show you some barebque that would make you feel like you had already transcended to the world to come.

Obviously, you worry a lot more about what other people think than I do. Both of you seem to overestimate the amount of attention that goys give to Jews. But that is partly because of your views of orthodoxy (the only ones who suit up). As a Gentile, I view Judaism as a continuum, some preferring Orthodox, some preferring Conservative or Reform. I do not see the gradations that you would as a Jew looking at it from the inside. In college, my best friend was a Conservative Jew, and I don’t believe he ever wore a conspicuously Jewish piece of clothing in his life.

Interesting story. Small town in Texas. They were going to an award. The house with the best Christmas lights, with some kind of prize. The judges really liked the decoration of one house that had all blue Christmas lights. When they started to award the prize, a controversy erupted, because naturally this was a Jewish family and the lights were for Hannukah. I don’t know what happened to the prize. The point is that when you’re in small-town America in fly-over country, often Jews are just your next door neighbor who goes to temple instead of church and outside of that there is little to distinguish him from the rest of the town.

Suggestions for cultivating female possibilities.
1) Find a way to put some kind of cultural poster that is tasteful and classic as a background on Torah Talks. Just some backstage set device that has you and Rabbs sitting in front of a scene of the Mediterranean, or someplace in Israel, as long as it conveys an upward-mobile tone. (You know, artsy.)
2) Rig up some device to give you a theme song, like William F. Buckley had for firing line, or some other evocative yet culturally elevating instrumental. Then the music goes for a couple of minutes while you and Rabbs are apparently talking with each other, then you dial the music down, Luke looks at the camera and says, “Welcome to Torah Talks. Today we are privileged to have as a guest the distinguished comedian and rabbi, Rabbi Rabbs. We are discussing…. and then when done, bring the music back up while you’re quietly talking to each other, and then cut, it’s a wrap. See, elevate the tone of the thing for the benefit of the lady viewers. It’s just an idea.

Posted in Christianity, Personal, R. Rabbs | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Latest Torah Talk Response

Preserving Israel As A Jewish State

Camera.org emails: As we approach the Jewish New Year 5771, the Jewish state is again under attack. Middle East figures call for the eradication of Israel while a global campaign is underway to delegitimize the nation, her leaders, army and society. (For more on Israel’s battle for legitimacy and how you can help, sign up for CAMERA’s two-day conference — October 10-11 at Boston University.)

Unfortunately many in the mainstream media play a role in this alarming delegitimization, not least of all the mainstream media outlet, Time Magazine. In its Sept. 13 edition, Time shocked many readers with a cover image of a large Magen David (Jewish star) comprised of daisies with the title “Why Israel Doesn’t Care About Peace.” The article by newly appointed Jerusalem Bureau Chief Karl Vick, while not quite as slanderous as the cover, nevertheless contains fallacies and invokes anti-Semitic stereotypes of Israeli Jews for whom money is allegedly paramount, more important than concern for “the Arabs who used to live on this land.” Accompanied by numerous photographs of Israelis lounging at the beach, in the park and in cafes, the piece suggests on the basis of a few interviews with Tel Aviv yuppies and left-wing academics and journalists, that Israel’s current successful economy and previous failures in peace negotiations have made Israelis hestitant about embarking on new negotiations with the Palestinians. An abbreviated version of the article is available online.

Why did Time choose to sensationalize a vapid article with such offensive imagery and such a defamatory headline?

On his CNN television program, “Reliable Sources,” host Howard Kurtz asked Time Managing Editor Richard Stengel just that:

But the headline is a bit of a marketing gimmick, because it suggests that Israel doesn’t want to participate in the peace process, despite the meetings that started this week in Washington. And when you read the story it’s as you described. So, obviously, you’re trying to draw people in with a provocative headline?

Stengel acknowledged that the headline was meant to provoke (and presumably, by extension, to sell more magazines), justifying it by suggesting it may be true:

Yes, it’s provocative headline, it’s provocative thesis. I mean, there are plenty of people who argue, as you know, Howie, that, in fact, Netanyahu is just giving the appearance that he actually wants peace, and to negotiate, because really he wants the U.S. to help him with Iran. And that may in fact be true.

Of course, the employment of anti-Semitic tropes is not new to Time magazine. A profile of Israeli leader Menachem Begin during the 1977 Camp David negotiations, began by flippantly invoking Dickens’ Jewish villain in Oliver Twist (“Begin rhymes with Fagin”).

The Wall Street Journal’s Bret Stephens recalls this in his analysis of Time‘s striking departure from ethical journalism.

Victor Davis Hanson also weighs in on the article’s anti-Semitic stereotyping on National Review’s blog, “The Corner.”

Phyllis Chesler analyzes the defamatory nature of the article here.

Why didn’t Time choose to “provoke” with the far more truthful headline “Why the Palestinians Reject Peace” and an article that examined Palestinian rejectionism or their readiness to utilize deadly violence in place of peaceful negotiations?

It seems Time believes anti-Semitism, rather than truthful analysis, sells more magazines.

In an environment where Israelis and Jews are increasingly demonized as unworthy of possessing a sovereign state of their own, Time Magazine‘s decision to run the article and cover is not only a violation of journalistic standards of objectivity and accuracy, but an incitement to hatred.

Posted in Israel | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Preserving Israel As A Jewish State

The Ten Commandments Of Luke Ford

Rabbi Rabbs goes off:

Posted in Personal, R. Rabbs | Comments Off on The Ten Commandments Of Luke Ford

Three Reasons For Not Asking For Reasons For Jewish Law

In his 2000 lecture on Numbers 19, Dennis Prager says that this is the area where he most differs with the tradition. I do not believe that there are any laws we can not understand. The traditional interpretation is that chukim (laws between man and God such as kosher) we can not understand.

Here are three reasons for not seeking out reasons so you understand the traditional antagonism for giving explanations for chukim:

* If you think you know the reason for a law, you can say, the reason no longer applies, so I can drop it.

* Israeli Orthodox thinker Yeshayahu Leibowitz said that people who looks for reasons for divine law are undermining God’s authority.

* It honors God to do it just because God said so.

Where do I differ then from the tradition? I don’t agree that God giving this law is all I need to know. It is critical to doing God’s will to know the reason and meaning of the law. It does not honor God to do it only because God said so. I do keep kosher because God said so, but I keep kosher also because I believe I understand much of the meaning of it.

It is sufficient for me that God said it for me to do it.

I believe that someone who inquires into the meaning of the law is more likely to do it better. We need to know the spirit of the law to do it better. I believe God wants us to prevent needless animal suffering. That’s why the law requires a knife without a nick.

So, my first reason for inquiring reasons, is to do the law better.

Two. The laws become an end in themselves if you don’t ask what their purpose is. If something becomes an end to itself rather than as a means to God and goodness, then it becomes a false god.

The Hebrew word for Jewish law is halakha, which literally means “way.” So what am I supposed to achieve?

I understand why some Jews 2,000 years ago tired of law as an end to itself and started Christianity.

A hundred years ago, most Jews were Orthodox. Now 10% are.

You can’t like wise and profound to the non-Jews if you don’t have reasons for keeping laws. Instead, you look goofy.

In the Orthodox world I grew up in, it was believed that if non-Orthodox Jews and non-Jews saw us keep the commandments, they would say, that’s beautiful, but when these people saw us walk to synagogue through a blizzard on the Sabbath and not drive, they didn’t say that’s beautiful. They said that’s weird.

Most people say that walking in the heat of summer and the cold of winter with kids crying half the walk is weird. It may be God’s will, but it doesn’t appear that way to others.

You may say God wants me to walk to the synagogue in the rain and he does not want me to use an umbrella on the Sabbath.

Posted in Christianity, Dennis Prager, Torah | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Three Reasons For Not Asking For Reasons For Jewish Law

When Did Thoughts Become Sinful?

In a 2001 lecture on Numbers 21, Dennis Prager fields a question from a Christian woman who said she was raised to regard impure thoughts as destructive to her soul.

Dennis: “When Christianity did away with Jewish law, thoughts became more sinful. Because Judaism makes so many behaviors sinful, it pretty much left the mind alone. When Christianity stopped making acts sinful, something had to be made sinful or the world would become chaotic, so thoughts became sinful.”

“When I moderated Religion on the Line, I started feeling sorry for many Christians. This is funny because I grew up envying Christians. I thought Christians had it great. They could eat anything they want. They can do anything they want on the Sabbath. And it’s all OK with their religion. What a deal!

“Then, after years of talking to Christian clergy and learning how much they walk around thinking thoughts are sinful, I thought, I’m lucky. If I thought thoughts were sinful, I’d be in hell. There’d be no room for anyone else. I’d just hog up the place.

“My religion tells me I can’t eat shrimp, etc, but little about what I must think or feel.

“I’d ask the clergy about their religion’s attitude to lust. The Christian clergy would say it is sinful. The rabbi, even the Orthodox rabbis, would say it is not a big deal. It depends on what you do with it. The rabbi would look at me as thought, this is the topic? How about something important?”

Posted in Christianity, Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on When Did Thoughts Become Sinful?