Three people killed in Kansas Jewish centers day before Passover

Report:

OVERLAND PARK, Kansas (Reuters) – Three people were killed Sunday afternoon at two different Jewish community facilities in a Kansas City-area suburb, and a man was in custody as authorities investigated whether or not the shootings were anti-Semitic, authorities said.

Police said it was too early to determine a motive for the shootings, but they were not ruling out the possibility that the shootings were a hate crime. They have called in the Federal Bureau of Investigation to assist with the investigation, Overland Park Police Chief John Douglass said in a news conference.

“We know it’s a vicious act of violence. Obviously two Jewish facilities, one might make that assumption.” Douglass said.

Why do people hate Jews? Here are some thoughts from the Amazon.com page for the book Why The Jews? The Reason For Antisemitism:

The very word Jew continues to arouse passions as does no other religious, national, or political name. Why have Jews been the object of the most enduring and universal hatred in history? Why did Hitler consider murdering Jews more important than winning World War II? Why has the United Nations devoted more time to tiny Israel than to any other nation on earth?
In this seminal study, Dennis Prager and Joseph Telushkin attempt to uncover and understand the roots of antisemitism — from the ancient world to the Holocaust to the current crisis in the Middle East. This postmillennial edition of Why the Jews? offers new insights and unparalleled perspectives on some of the most recent, pressing developments in the contemporary world, including:

• The replicating of Nazi antisemitism in the Arab world
• The pervasive anti-Zionism/antisemitism on university campuses
• The rise of antisemitism in Europe
• Why the United States and Israel are linked in the minds of antisemites

For many years until his death in 2002, William Pierce (bio) led the National Alliance, which according to the Anti-Defamation League, was “the single most dangerous organized hate group in the United States today.”

According to Pierce, whites are committing suicide and the Jews, more than anyone, are responsible. In one radio commentary, he noted how much thoughtful mail he got urging him to go easy on Jews. Pierce argued that you have to see the forest, not just the trees.

According to Pierce in 1998, “if one looks into every destructive institution in our society, if one looks behind every destructive policy, one finds non-Jews as well as Jews. The ruinous immigration policy we have now in the United States is favored by some Gentiles as well as by virtually all Jews.”

Hmm. I suspect that most Jews in America oppose high rates of illegal immigration. On the other hand, despite Stephen Steinlight‘s efforts, every major Jewish organization taking a position on immigration favors amnesty and essentially open borders.

Pierce did not indiscriminately and primarily blame Jews for every ill in America: “If we look into the destructive exploitation of our natural environment, the cutting down of our forests and the strip-mining of our land and the polluting of our rivers, we probably will find greedy and short-sighted Gentile profiteers more often than we will find Jews.”

If you look at the environmental movement, you will find a disproportionate number of Jews. If you look at animal rights, you will again find a disproportionate number of Jews.

What is the most powerful institution in America today? According to Pierce, it is the news media and the news media is disproportionately owned and directed by Jews (almost none of them Orthodox, almost all of them secular, few of them practice the dictates of the Jewish religion such as keeping kosher, the Sabbath, and strapping on tefillin every day).

So why are there so many Jews in influential positions in the media? Because Ashkenazi Jews in particular have a way above average verbal intelligence, they come from a storytelling tradition, and they have more of an intense drive for success, prestige and the transmission of ideas than do non-Jews (because down deep, Jews fear that if they don’t dominate social discourse, if they don’t set the parameter of what is socially acceptable to publicly discuss, people unfriendly to Jews will and that will lead to another Auschwitz).

Jews in the media disagree about many things but they do tend to collectively shape what is OK to talk about publicly, and one of the things that is not OK to talk about publicly is Jewish influence in the media. Another thing that is unacceptable to talk about publicly is racial differences such as Jewish intelligence. Jews generally fear that such talk will lead to another holocaust.

Non-Jew Steve Sailer wrote in 2010:

To quantify the statement that “Jews are a small group, but influential in their areas of concentration,” in 2009, the Atlantic Monthly came up with a list of the top 50 opinion pundits: half are of Jewish background.
Over 1/3rd of the 2009 Forbes 400 are of Jewish background, according to the Jewish Telegraph Agency’s reporter who covers Jewish philanthropy.

Joel Stein of the LA Times found in 2007 that people of Jewish background hold a large majority of the most powerful positions in Hollywood.

This is not to say that influential Jews are at all united in what they favor. On the other hand, it is more or less true that Jews hold something of a veto over what topics are considered appropriate for discussion in the press, Jewish influence itself being the most obvious example of a topic that is off the table in polite society.

I have Jewish friends who’ve lost Jewish friends due to their fascination with Kevin MacDonald’s critiques of the Jews.

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on Three people killed in Kansas Jewish centers day before Passover

The Adoption Of Civic Virtue

I admire the work ethic that leads latinos to rob the recycling bins we put out at night to take from that which was supposed to fund city services. Only racists want to launch an assimilation campaign urging the adoption of civic virtue. After all, aren’t these latinos Americans, or at least undocumented workers, with strong family values who pay taxes and deserve a share of the American dream?

Chaim Amalek: “Jennifer, every comely young white woman has it within her power to visit Luke in LA and prevent this new political party from taking off, simply by keeping him too busy…to engage in political action. Comely young White Woman, Know This! The fate of millions may be determined by what happens [with you and Luke].”

Mike: “It’s all in good fun. Wisely, we don’t seriously allege that a group that we’re hankerin’ to merge with …. has an unspecified, built-in set moral shortcomings. It could piss off the potential in-laws. I leave this thought incomplete now, and exit the stage again ’til the trumpets call me back.”

If there’s a cause that will make my name stink to high heaven, I’m on it like blacks on blondes. There’s just something about marginalized sub-cultures that grabs my attention.

Posted in Latino, Los Angeles | Comments Off on The Adoption Of Civic Virtue

What’s The Point Of Group Pride?

Many of my friends say they don’t get racial pride. Why be proud of an accident of birth?

I get it. I too felt disgust for “white pride” and “black pride” and “brown pride” and “gay pride,” though I did get “Jewish pride” because, let’s face it, we’re awesome. We’re God’s Chosen People.

Then I read this Tom Wolfe lecture he gave in 2006 where he pointed out: “Each individual adopts a set of values which, if truly absolute in the world – so ordained by some almighty force – would make not that individual but his group…the best of all possible groups, the best of all inner circles.”

I saw truth in that. I remember when I was a believing Seventh-Day Adventist, I looked at the world through a prism where my group came out on top — because of our length of life, purity of living, Biblical knowledge, our heavenly salvation, our divine choseness.

Then I fell into marxism and I saw marxists intellectuals as humanity’s elite, the vanguard of a better future.

Then I fell for Dennis Prager and Judaism. I saw Dennis Prager as the greatest of all living intellectuals and I treasured that I knew him. I initially converted through Reform Judaism, and while I never saw Reform Judaism as the superior way of practicing Judaism, I tried to look at things as Dennis did and I tried to see all three Jewish denominations as having unique gifts.

By year 2000, I affiliated exclusively Orthodox and quickly saw Orthodoxy as the pinnacle of religious expression.

While working as a journalist, I saw that as the coolest possible profession because you get the inside goods on how the world works.

When I entered therapy and racked up years in it, I came to see that as essential to leading a conscious life.

So whether or not we come out and say we have white or black or Jewish or brown pride, most of us tend to see the world through the lens of what will make our group come out on top. People are more comfortable with their own kind. People choose to live among people who are most genetically similar to them (whites choose to live among whites, blacks among blacks, latinos among latinos, asians among asians) and people will generally make more sacrifices for people who are genetically similar to them than for those who are different (step-children are invariably treated worse, statistically, than biological children, etc).

The Japanese, for instance, have taken on many of the forms of democracy but they remain a uniquely Japanese nation completely different from western states.

Is race skin-deep? No. In 60 life history outcomes of things like IQ, athletic ability, STD rates, crime rates, credit scores, academic tests, income, complexity of social structure, brain size, body fat percentage, amount of sex you have, predisposition to monogamy and socializing, length of life, the three main races of Caucasian, Oriental and black always fall out the same way with blacks and Orientals on the extremes and whites in between but closer to Orientals.

There’s no superior race, but the different races are, on average, superior at different things. Different peoples have different gifts.

We can choose to be indifferent to evolution but evolution is never indifferent to us. Groups that adapt and reproduce and grow in power inevitably subjugate those who are less successful at these things, and it really does not matter how nice anyone is to out-groups. The Pilgrims came to America determined to treat the Indians well as opposed to the cruel Spaniards, but when they arrived and set up camp, the Indians grew suspicious and seeing accurately that they would be competing for the same land, repeatedly tried to exterminate the Pilgrims, who survived and eventually conquered the Indians, subjugated them, and took control of their land. It really didn’t matter how nice the Indians or the Pilgrims were to each other. In the end, one group was going to take control of the land and the other group was going to be largely wiped out. That’s how the world works.

Hundreds of whites who’ve never thought about being white are now thinking about being white in California because latinos are now the biggest group. When the country was 90% white, whites didn’t worry about themselves as whites. They just saw all the different types of whites — from Russians to Scots to Brits to Australians to Finns, etc, but now that whites are increasingly in the minority in many parts of America, whites are discovery what they have in common with other whites (an individualist bent for those of Northern European stock, obeying and respecting the law and one’s teachers at a much higher rate than do blacks and latinos, focusing on work, education and family, veneration for our country’s founders and for Christianity, stigmatizing welfare, STDs and out-of-wedlock births, the pursuit of books and intellectual interests, etc).

If two whites are at a party that is otherwise blacks acting black (on balance, blacks are more outgoing, social, voluble, loud, forthright, rhetorically skilled, better at improvisation and putting on a show, than non-blacks), they may well discover they have a lot in common solely on the basis of their race.

What do I think about gender-based pride? It seems really silly to me, but on the other hand, I thank God every morning, as required by Judaism, that I was not born a woman. The Torah commands me to take sex-based pride.

As Jared Taylor wrote:

Humans have an exquisite sensitivity to differences between their group and other groups. Group conflict is as old as our species. Humans are prepared to fight each other for all kinds of reasons: ethnicity, language, nationality, religion, and even for political reasons, but of all the kinds of conflict, racial conflict is the most chronic and difficult to control, and that’s because race is part of biology. It is immediately visible, and is usually an indicator of differences in behavior and culture and not just a difference in appearance.

Wherever you find people of more than one race trying to share the same territory, there is conflict.

Posted in Adventist, Evolution, Jews, Whites | Comments Off on What’s The Point Of Group Pride?

Feel Your Feelings!

LCSW Kathy Henry says:

Do you really feel your feelings? Do you allow yourself to feel the depths of your emotions? My guess is, probably not. There is a lot at stake!! If you allow yourself to be open and feel the full extent of your feelings, you might feel crazy, out of control, or be faced with some decisions you need to make about your life that you aren’t ready to face!

Most of us didn’t learn how to feel and express our emotions. A lot of times our feelings weren’t convenient for our parents, siblings, friends, etc., so we learned to suppress them. So when they start to come up later in life, they are so powerful that our instinct is to keep them inside and tightly controlled. It makes sense, until . . . .

Picture a full 2 liter Coke bottle. The carbonation represents your feelings. 2 liter pic is fine as long as it goes undisturbed. But if you shake it up, it bubbles up and we all know what is going to happen if we try to open it – it all gushes out at once! Your feelings are the same way. You keep them stuffed down inside and all is well until you go to try to express some strong feelings, then they all start coming out at once! You are just as overwhelmed and confused as the person you are expressing those feelings to! And they are messy, aren’t they?

The point is, that it is supremely important for us to allow ourselves to feel our feelings. Why don’t we? Because it is a scary, uncontrolled and messy process. If you want a healthy, free, and peaceful life and good relationships, however, you’re going to have to let your emotions come out!

According to the book, Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences, liberals have more expressive faces.

The authors add: “Our big brains are better equipped to spin a story that denies the relevance of biological forces than to negate biological forces.”

I suspect that most of us have many feelings we don’t want to face so we wall them off. Many of these feelings have to do with race. For instance, I am curious if morality and conscience require the ability for abstract thought (ie, an IQ north of 90)? The higher the IQ, for instance, the more clearly a person can recall the past and see into the future, to therefore have loyalty and gratitude, to use the subjunctive (if everyone does what I am about to do, the world will be a better or worse place), and see the benefits of cooperation. Lower IQ people, therefore, are less likely to have a developed conscience and deserve much closer minding.

I read this disturbing essay by a university professor who has taught philosophy in Africa for three decades and it laid out a lot of things that most of us never want to struggle with.

The word “racism” wasn’t invented until the 1930s and it didn’t gain common currency until the 1960s. Prior to the 1960s, attitudes and behaviors that now get labeled racist, such as segregation, were regarded as common sense. Human nature hasn’t changed since the 1960s, but norms of behavior have in the western world so many expressions and choices that were common before the 1960s are now regarded as the worst thing in the world, such as wanting to keep your children away from blacks.

Similarly, prior to World War II, it was common for white people to have pride in being white and to have pride in western civilization. Then that pride came tumbling down.

South African whites, for instance, still had the ability to rule their country in the 1990s, but they gave up that power. They lost their confidence and as a result, the country went to hell and many of them moved out. The same sort of dynamics are happening now in America. Traditional Americans have lost their pride in being white. Instead, many of them feel guilty about it. And every year, the nation becomes less white. Schools that used to be named for Thomas Jefferson now get named for Martin Luther King and Cesar Chavez.

Just under the surface, however, of these forbidden feelings of preference for one’s own kind, nature is not denied. Genetic similarity still exacts a powerful tug on everybody’s psyche. When it comes to choosing a place to live, America is as segregated as ever. Once a neighborhood becomes more than 10-20% black or latino, for instance, whites move out.

Most whites are careful to say nothing politically incorrect in public for fear of loss of status, loss of friends, and loss of job, but once they get started talking truths, as they see them, about race, they often find they can’t stop. As Kathy Henry wrote: “You keep them stuffed down inside and all is well until you go to try to express some strong feelings, then they all start coming out at once!”

It’s not easy, but any smart person can convert to Orthodox Judaism, but once you finish the formal process, you realize that while joining a religion may be relatively easy, joining a particular people is much more challenging. You likely have different genes from your co-religionists. Judaism isn’t in your blood. You don’t have those sacred familial ties. You might have a piece of paper that says you’ve joined the tribe, but have you really? Are you accepted? Are you counted as one of us?

Posted in Psychology, Race, Whites | Comments Off on Feel Your Feelings!

I Have A Plan

I have a plan to save the United States and the West. It is called nationalism — meaning that people should organize in their group interest.

Americans should support the end of affirmative action/quotas/set-asides as well as freedom of association, freedom to hire and rent and sell to whomever we want, freedom to use IQ testing for employment, securing our border, repatriating illegal aliens, and the rule of law. Diversity will destroy us, unity will preserve us.

The Jewish Alternative Right Movement started tonight.

People are mute because they fear loss of employment should their political activities come to light. That was the moral of the recent story regarding the CEO of Mozilla and homo marriage. “If they can get to him, what hope have I?”

Is it possible to have a strong tribal identity and to not feel hostility for the majority population? Of course. Are you more likely to feel hostility for the majority population the more deeply you develop your tribal identity? Of course. The stronger your tribal identity (be it as a Jew, Black, Chinese, Mexican, etc), the less strong your identity with the majority population (such as America). I remember when I was a Seventh-Day Adventist, the more deeply Adventist the identity, the less the person identified with the majority population.

I don’t see how any tribe could survive for a long time as a tiny minority unless it regularly stokes its hostility to the majority. The only way that Jews survived for more than 2500 years as a tiny minority was to regularly contrast behavior and thinking that are Jewish (good) as opposed to goyish (bad).

Chaim Amalek:

The ideas we are bandying about here were almost universally accepted among white folk everywhere in Christendom (and to be blunt, among most Jews and Muslims and Hindus) everywhere before the second world war. Hitler in his evil denied the white race the tools it needs for its own survival.

Yidden! Let us stop being seen as the universal solvent of racial solidarity and instead espouse for the goyim the same sort of bonds of group identity we avidly seek for ourselves!

Christians can’t tie their own shoes without a Jew to help them. But for the Jews Mary and Jesus, they would never have built any of the great gothic cathedrals of Europe. So too it is with this. For the White Race to survive, it needs some measure of Jewish guidance. First Jesus, then Marx, then Freud, then (Betty) Friedan and now Luke Ford.

The “stranger” that the Torah alludes to is not the illegal alien, but the Jew who finds himself in a strange town. That is the “stranger” the Torah wants Jews to help.

I just thought of a great Passover gag to play on left leaning, open border Jews. Hire some homeless black dudes to hang out just outside the Jew’s home when they open the door to ask if anyone is hungry. Then in comes the homeless dudes, preferably accompanied by twenty Mexicans.

Posted in America, Jews, Personal, Whites | Comments Off on I Have A Plan

Do morality and conscience require the ability for abstract thought (ie, an IQ north of 90)?

The higher the IQ, for instance, the more clearly a person can recall the past and see into the future, to use the subjunctive (if everyone does what I am about to do, the world will be a better or worse place), and to see the benefits of cooperation. Lower IQ, therefore, are less likely to have a developed conscience and deserve much closer minding. In my life, I have noticed that people with a higher IQ are more likely to exhibit loyalty, gratitude and empathy.

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on Do morality and conscience require the ability for abstract thought (ie, an IQ north of 90)?

She Turned Out To Be In Her 70s!

So, a friend of mine my age, answered a singles ad on Craigslist and talked to the woman and she turned out to be in her 70s! On the positive side, she’s in Fleetwood Mac.

Yes, a friend of mine. A friend very much like me. In fact, a part of me that I want to deny.

Chaim Amalek: Septuagenarians need love too.
Craigslist is for total losers.
Luke, have you been messing with Craigslist again? This is not the place for a Torah Jew like you to find a proper shiduch.
>> I was desperate.
Think of the advantages: no risk of pregnancy. She won’t beat you in arm wrestling.
Also, young chicks get turned on when they see a man with another woman. So you might be able to use your 70+ year old honey as a tool to get something younger. Like, say, her grand daughter.
Also, 70 year old women don’t menstruate, so no need for you to worry about any mikvah/needah issues.
Sex whenever you want it, without fear of sin.

Luke: I’m gonna leverage this relationship into something beautiful and lasting.

Chaim: Be sure you get into her will first.

Luke: When I’m set for life, we’ll see who’s laughing.

Let us put it this way. Suppose she somehow tracked me down and knocked on my door. Would I let her in? Probably. Now suppose once in, she marched to my room, and said “I want you”. Would I throw her out? Probably not. Let’s say she asked me for $400? Would I pay it? No.

Posted in Dating | Comments Off on She Turned Out To Be In Her 70s!

When Sheldon Adelson Says ‘Our Country,’ He Means Israel

Zionist Jews in America are sometimes accused of putting Israel’s interests before America. Now we have Sheldon Adelson talking up a border fence for “our country,” meaning Israel, but he essentially supports open borders for the United States.

Why wouldn’t American Jews who want a Jewish state with secure borders keeping infiltrators out want the same thing for America? They do. Zionist Jews in America tend to vote Republican.

Ann Coulter writes:

Between having Republican presidential candidates fly to Las Vegas to kiss his ring, billionaire Sheldon Adelson has managed to fit in time to talk Sen. Lindsey Graham into sponsoring a bill banning Internet gambling.

As you may know, Sheldon Adelson is a CASINO OWNER. Internet gambling would compete with his casino business.

On the other hand, when it comes to the services Adelson isn’t selling, but buying — low-skilled workers — he’s for unbridled competition, preferring not to limit the supply even to people who are legally in the United States. (Weirdly, so is Lindsey Graham!)

Adelson is a big backer of amnesty, telling The Wall Street Journal: “It would be inhumane to send those people back, to send 12 million people out of this country. … So we’ve got to find a way, find a route for those people to get legal citizenship.”

As Milton Friedman said, “With some notable exceptions, businessmen favor free enterprise in general but are opposed to it when it comes to themselves.”

Adelson is an especially telling example of the self-interest of businessmen on immigration. His newspaper, Israel Today, the largest newspaper in Israel, is wildly patriotic on immigration (and everything else).

Israel Today has trumpeted the success of the 15-foot razor-wire fence along Israel’s 140-mile border with Egypt, triumphantly noting last August that, for the first time, “no infiltrations were recorded from the Egyptian border, compared to 193 from the same month last year.”

Adelson himself had suggested just such a policy to the Los Angeles Times last year, saying he wanted to “Put a big fence around our country.”

By “our country,” he, of course, meant Israel. In America, he wants illegal immigrants pouring across the border to provide him with an endless supply of cheap labor.

Recently, Israel has been “rounding up” African refugees, giving them $3,500 and plane tickets to Uganda, to encourage them to “self-deport.” Welcome to El Al Airlines. We’re about to begin pre-boarding for Flight 259, offering non-stop, one-way service to Kampala, Uganda. At this time we’d like to invite our premium-plus illegal immigrants to board…

The Anti-Defamation League has been taking polls on anti-Semitism in America for decades. In 2013, the ADL reported that — “once again” — foreign-born Hispanics had the highest rates of anti-Semitic views: 36 percent compared with 14 percent of all Americans and 20 percent of African-Americans. This was an improvement over 2011, when 42 percent of foreign-born Hispanics were found to have anti-Semitic views.

How might America’s support for Israel be affected by having a populace that’s 30 or 40 percent Hispanic?

The importation of more than a million poor people to America every year also has the effect of admitting a fair number of terrorists. Among them: Rasmieh Yousef Odeh, Mohammad Hassan Hamdan, Nidal Hasan, Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, Najibullah Zazi, Sulejman Talovic, Peter Odighizuwa, Ali Hassan Abu Kamal, dozens of Somali terrorists living in Minnesota, Omar Abdel-Rahman and the 9/11 terrorists.

I would think that this country’s open-door policy toward terrorists would be of some concern to the owner of any Las Vegas casino — a well-known terrorist target.

They won’t be coming to kiss Adelson’s ring.

Posted in ADL, Ann Coulter, Immigration, Israel, Sheldon Adelson | Comments Off on When Sheldon Adelson Says ‘Our Country,’ He Means Israel

Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa by Ilana Mercer

I did this interview via email.

 1. LUKE: How eager was the publishing world and then the reading public for the messages of your book “Into the Cannibal’s Pot”?

 ILANA MERCER: As is often the case, the “publishing world” was at odds with the reading public. The public was extremely eager for the message of “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa.” With the exception of the book’s heroic publisher, whose words of wisdom your readers can read on “The Cannibal’s” Amazon page (“This is a book about ideas and ideology,” he writes.) The courage and forethought of Stairway Press of Seattle paid off. The book has done well, given the fact that mainstream publishers ran from it horrified. The “Preface” to the book, available through Amazon’s “Look Inside” feature, details the ridiculous responses my agent received from what conservatives and libertarians consider their go-to imprints.

 2. LUKE: What are the chief lessons for America from South Africa’s decline?

 ILANA MERCER: One crucial lesson, and I quote form the “Introduction” to “Into the Cannibal’s Pot,” is that “a highly developed Western society can be dismantled with relative ease. In South Africa, this deconstruction has come about in the wake of an almost overnight shift in the majority/minority power structure. In the U.S., a slower, more incremental transformation is under way. It began with a state-orchestrated, historically unparalleled, mass importation of inassimilable ethnic groups into a country whose creed is that it has no creed any longer.”

The US is fast becoming a mass of competing interests, in which the politically weak vie to keep more of their rightful property; the politically powerful fight to get their paws on that very property. Democracy is especially dangerous in such ethnically and racially divided societies, where majorities and minorities are rigidly predetermined and politically permanent. Like South Africa, America is destined to degenerate into a dominant-party state. Thirty years on, when the immigration Rubicon is crossed, the population of our country will be poorer, less educated and more welfare-dependent. One party will represent this majority. This party will serve as an instrument of perpetual oppression of the minority by a politically powerful majority, just as the African National Congress does in South Africa.

3. LUKE: Given the decline in South Africa since the end of apartheid, do you, in retrospect, give apartheid more credit? Do you think your father was right to protest apartheid?

ILANA MERCER: My book distinguishes between natural rights and political rights. Man is endowed with natural—but not necessarily political—rights. People fuss about apartheid having denied the majority its democratic rights (the vote). Citizenship rights, however, are not natural rights. It is natural rights that the law ought to always and everywhere respect and uphold. In denying blacks these rights, apartheid was reprehensible. To quote from “The Cannibal”: “In its police state methods—indefinite detention without trial, declarations of a state of emergency—apartheid destroyed the individual defenses of equality before the law, the presumption of innocence, habeas corpus and various other very basic freedoms. That the apartheid regime contravened natural justice by depriving Africans of rights to property and due process is indisputable as it is despicable.” (Page 231.) Dad was right and heroic to oppose apartheid before it became fashionable to do so; he was wrong to place his trust in the ANC and in what I’ve termed “raw, ripe democracy.”

 4. LUKE: What do you think about Israel absorbing about 80,000 Ethiopians and calling them Jewish? Do you expect more non-Jews around the world to identify as Jews if it will get them into the prosperous modern state of Israel? Should Israel fall for this scam? Do you expect Israeli Ethiopian Jews to assimilate into Israel and to reach the same average levels of success as Ashkenazi Jews achieve? Do you think all peoples and races and religions are equally suited for flourishing in a first world economy such as Israel’s or America’s?

 ILANA MERCER: I believe that very many Russians have done just that—immigrated to Israel for a better life claiming Jewish ancestry. Unlike America’s preferred immigrants, these Russians are said to be right-leaning and nationalistic. However, Israeli leaders seem far more inclined than America’s louts to do what’s in their countrymen’s best interests. Bibi Netanyahu wants to retain Israel’s national character. He said as much recently to members of Israel’s Manufacturers Association. And I quote the Israeli PM: “We suffer from a problem that actually stems from Israel’s economic success,” he said, explaining the problems that arise from the breached border with Egypt. “We have become almost the only First World country that can be reached by foot from the Third World. We are flooded with surge of refugees who threaten to wash away our achievements and damage our existence as a Jewish democratic state.”

 Unlike the Demopublican quislings, Benjamin Netanayu doesn’t suffer any blind spots when it comes to the very real potential of Third-World refugees flooding Israel and transforming his country for the worse, forever.

As to the other part of your question: I’m not up on the Ethiopian issue, but I see societies as a reflection of the individuals that make them up, and individuals as a reflection of their actions. Thus, I have no doubt that certain Israeli Ethiopians will do very well in Israel. As an individualist, race as an organizing principle doesn’t work for me. Rather, the road to freedom lies in beating back the state so that individuals can regain freedom of association, dominion over property, the absolute right of self-defense; the right to hire, fire, and, generally, associate at will.

 ***
ILANA Mercer is a paleolibertarian writer, based in the United States. She pens WND’s longest-standing, exclusive paleolibertarian column, “Return to Reason.” She is a contributor to the preeminent libertarian site Economic Policy Journal, and is a fellow at the Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies, an award-winning, independent, non-profit, free-market economic policy think tank. Ilana’s latest book is “Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons For America From Post-Apartheid South Africa.” Her website is www.IlanaMercer.com. She blogs at www.BarelyaBlog.com.

Posted in Israel, South Africa | Comments Off on Into the Cannibal’s Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa by Ilana Mercer

For Which Beliefs Should You Be Fired?

Apr. 7, 2014, Dennis Prager said: “There are times when a person’s views are so horrific, it is hard to understand how a company could continue to employ someone. If a guy is in the Ku Klux Klan, if a guy is in a white supremacist fascistic group, I understand it. If you deny the Holocaust and you deny it publicly. There are a few [beliefs a person can hold that make him worthy of being fired] because you’re talking about freaks. Freaks are in the KKK.”

What if you believe blacks or Jews or Chinese are superior (as do many members of those groups)? What if you deny the Armenian genocide publicly? What are the other incorrect positions on history that should get a person fired? I suspect that many, if not most, Chinese deny the extent of Mao’s genocide. Should they be fired?

What about Americans who have the identical views on race as Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and Harry Truman? Should they be fired? They were white supremacists (in the sense Prager uses the term).

Posted in Dennis Prager | Comments Off on For Which Beliefs Should You Be Fired?