I’m A Lousy Pen Pal

Bill writes:

All of your replies have been 3 or 4 words. Why so reserved? Are you concerned that you might say the wrong thing and scare me off? Do you (inaccurately) assume that the acorn didn‚Äôt grow far from the tree? Are you not sure how to categorize me? Do you find conflict in what you think you know of me versus who I actually am? Do you not give a shit? Do you feel uneasy knowing that I have thrown away many offers in the adult business that most would dream to have? Is it that I have serious moral conflict with the business that destroyed so many? Is it that you improperly reported that my brother was killed because….when we know that call for his death came from a temple? Is it that you reported that I died?

It is because I write for a living and that leaves me drained. I’m not lengthy in my replies with anyone, even women I date… Also, I have tendonitis in both elbows and I limit my time on the computer… Also, I just feel overwhelmed writing my blogs etc, squeezing out a living, and I prefer to get away from the computer and read books and write books… If you are ever in LA, I’d be happy to meet up with you and shmooze. Chaim Amalek writes: "Why not hire a Mexican to handle your correspondence? Quite a few are as literate as the average Anglo. Make Bush immigration policies work for you!"

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on I’m A Lousy Pen Pal

I Don’t Care About Cuts At The L.A. Times

Why all this handwringing over cuts at this mediocre newspaper?

If there are stories that are not getting covered by L.A. Times reporters, then that creates opportunities for others to do the job. I rely on The New York Times (as well as the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post) for my national and international reporting. The writing quality of The L.A. Times is decidedly inferior to the New York Times. L.A. Times national and international stories make few ripples. Almost nobody on the East Coast says, “Did you see what The L.A. Times wrote today about President Bush (or Iraq or the economy or Washington politics, etc)?”

I’m reading today’s Wall Street Journal article about the demise of the stand alone L.A. Times Sunday Book Review and I was shocked to see it described as “highly esteemed.”

Highly esteemed by who? I’ve been trying to get through it for many years and it is just plain dull (and decidedly inferior to the New York Times book coverage).

Does anyone think that people will read fewer books because the L.A. Times Sunday Book Review runs to fewer pages? There’s no shortage of book coverage elsewhere (try The Elegant Variation).

I don’t think it would be any loss if The L.A. Times closed tomorrow. Something at least as good would replace it.

I believe Charles Bobrinksy is spot on when he tells PBS’s Frontline:

People want to read about what’s going on in their own communities, and the Web usually can’t provide that. The Web can tell you what’s going on in Iraq; the Web can tell you what’s going on in Washington, D.C. It can’t tell you what’s going on in Des Moines if you live in Des Moines.

It’s difficult to cover your own community unless you are backed up by an organization (be it the Jewish Journal or The Los Angeles Times). That’s why you’ll find hundreds of bloggers in Los Angeles writing about Iraq but very few of them do any hard-hitting reporting on Los Angeles. There are dozens of Jewish bloggers in Los Angeles but almost none of them advance any stories about Jewish Los Angeles.

Charles Bobrinksy says:

The L.A. Times unfortunately hasn’t figured that out. They’ve decided that they have to be a national newspaper with international coverage. They’ve got over 20 foreign bureaus, including bureaus in Istanbul and Cairo. Nobody is reading the L.A. Times wanting to find out what’s happening in Istanbul, so it’s critical that the L.A. Times figure out what it is, which is a provider of local news about what’s going on in Southern California….Readers care about the local entertainment industry, which they don’t do a very good job of covering in the L.A. Times. They care about things like fashion, which The New York Times does a very good job of covering; the L.A. Times doesn’t. They should care about issues like immigration. All of the Mexican-American immigration issues should be front and center in the L.A. Times. They should own that story, and they don’t in the way they should.

…What we would argue is that The Washington Post does a better job of covering its local market with fewer reporters than the L.A. Times does, maybe 15 to 20 percent fewer. How does it do that? It does it through focus. If you focus on your target market — again, Washington D.C., politics; in the case of The Washington Post, the Washington Redskins, who they do a great job of covering at The Washington Post — then you can get by with less reporters than the L.A. Times has, because it’s trying to cover the world. It’s trying to report on why Bush went to war in Iraq instead of what’s going on in Southern California.

…We’re saying there’s a role for probably three national newspapers — The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, and USA Today. Each has its own niche; all three are national newspapers. We don’t think there’s any demand for a fourth. The L.A. Times is trying to be that fourth.

The Jewish Journal of Los Angeles has the same problem as The Los Angeles Times. While it should be focusing on Los Angeles, the Jewish Journal has delusions that it has expertise in national and international coverage.

This leaves enormous swathes of local coverage to bloggers such as myself. I have yet to do much with this opportunity because I’ve found it hard to monetize such reporting and because I lack the courage to do it day in and day out. It’s much easier to get people to talk about difficult issues when you say you are from an established publication rather than from your own blog. A blogger investigating a tough story is going to be looked upon by many/most of his subjects as someone seeking trouble.

Chaim Amalek writes: “Yes – it is much easier to intimidate a lone blogger than say, someone with a New York Times ID badge dangling from his neck. (The latter has backup that the former has not.) Perhaps the way to monetize your work is to follow the lead suggested by Page Six, and accept payments from people who don’t want to be written about. I’m sure that this happens all the time (why so little gossip about Howard Stern? I suspect that either he buys their silence either with free publicity or with information), so it isn’t as though you would be the only one doing this. So that’s what I suggest: use the internet to become known as an especially vexatious pest, and then monetize your work by selling silence to people with money.”

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on I Don’t Care About Cuts At The L.A. Times

Preparing For The Sabbath

From the New York Post:

The johns included Wall Street types and Orthodox Jews in prayer shawls, residents said. "I’ve run into groups of four to five Orthodox Jews on Friday afternoons decked out in their talis coming in for a quickie," one said.

Posted in Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Preparing For The Sabbath

Harry Jakobs – The Time Of Your Life

Richard Raybourne writes:

Hello Luke,

So I have been hearing this rumour about Harry Jakob’s being dead and all…I last saw him in Montreal in September 2002. I believed I even emailed (Mickey) Jason LeCavalier about it. As far as I know he looked very well and alive then.

Now I want to set some of the The Time Of Your Life (TOYL) records straight. Please don’t take offence to my humour or language. First of all, I am so damn tired of hearing how much of a “shyster” hustler , scummier rip off artist everything negative under the sun about this guy. If he was so fucked up why and how the fuck did he ever get so much money to mess people up like that when they all already knew he was so full of shit? I definitely didn’t agree with his unscrupulous hustle and how he even messed me up with TOYL (as we called it) 2ND season that never happened but that shit was going on for years with many other people in the film industry. Those so- called tax shelter years in the late 80s-90s played many actors directors and producers.

Thing is at the end of the day…you know what? He did something. He still gave a shot to some people to make shit happen. CINARS studios break came from TOYL and look what eventually happened with out Harry down the line. CINAR still made great kids shows but……..

Now let us not forget folks, in 1986 and 1987 when Rebel and TOYL was released… jack shit was happening for English Canadian film and television…especially in “Quebec”. Back then CFCF/CTV had “Snow Job ” and not much else. Most Canadian programs were 90 percent American..and CBC wasn’t doing much more then …CBC stuff…you know Beachcombers nshit…Johnny Wayne was still chillin with Frank Shuster. The francophone stations had even worst crap on, translated cheesy American ABC weekly 70s movies starring Donna Pescow , Anson Williams and Bernie Kopell. Or something European with Gerard Depardieu being always violent, driving off some Swiss cliff having rough sex with a his impostor.

That “negro” Harry still had the balls to get shit done by any means. If people were too fuckin stupid and yes everyone of us out there who worked on his so-called worst film or shittiest syndicated show, ever did know that this Dr. Rabbi had such bad vibes and was so evil? Then why the fuck did he get shit done..why did he get another chance to shoot why did so many actors even known ones audition? .Why wasn’t his ass capped then 20 years ago. by the mob who was looking for him? Harry knew how to manipulate people and who ever he hooked up with sucked his dick up with it. Those are the facts. I saw how everybody who worked on TOYL would literally chant “Let’s Kill Harry ! on set and when he would show up …it was Oh Harry ! hi Harry! He actually did have a near fatal car accident as the chants were becoming so religious on set and he was not a very happy camper, never the same from that day !

We went on strike for contract shit and walked off the set. It made the papers! his own publicist set him up! Know what though? He still got laid , he made money and many got played. Mind you the *&^% government does that shit every day to everyone of us to the point of a brand new world war, corruption, disease, poverty and bullshit.! What can we do? just bitch about it but nothing is changing today or tomorrow or any time soon..

Life is not always what we want it to be…Yes I will not deny I had many hard years of struggles as a result of that “cursed’ series but you know what? I am still the first Black Canadian to get his black ass on TV all over the world for some odd 5 years in syndication. I did gain notoriety…It was a great training ground for an actor to be at entry level ..it did open big doors.and no other real Montreal Quebec Canada series that has been shot .. has been represented all over the world like that..if so they didn’t get much more even in royalties still to today.

I still get recognized and sign autographs from people did love the show.from as far as Greece..and Israel. Only nicey nicey conservative DeGrassi Jr High from Toronto was rival to our asses and it sucked big time square ass then. Chambre en Ville , Riverdale or Norhwood or some shit were all “biters!”

We the, TIME OF YOUR LIFE dealt with gay, heroin, suicide, guns, cults, violence toward women, fucked up dream sequences, porn, rape, abortion, promiscuity, alcoholism, kung fu, bullying with no stereotypes in 130 episodes in a built in studio warehouse next to Orange Julep with full dressed sets n shit. Shooting daily from 6:30 am call time to 5:30 pm wrap ( paid over time if needed) at 150.00 per day..Episodes were shown 2 weeks in advance in soap opera video format in a sweet time slot Monday to Friday at 4:00 pm right after General Fuckin Hospital! That slot belonged to Bob “Back Kick” Barker Price is Right and we punked Bob price right off!. For first timers that was the bomb! The weekly syndication made up for 5 years of TV in some countries! Many actors may never have such an opportunity

What killed the show I really believe was he really wanted to make it as independent as possible without the participation of political institutions that would’ve eventually fucked us up anyway. I would have been another pretty show with no grit and possibly killed off all Black actors or my character (Matt Peters ) would have killed or smoked freebase or ganged up some bangers stereotype then.

Our excellent cast had nuff culture …Shondelle Riley (Jessie Dragon) and her sweet mother Claire of Native and Afro American decent, myself of West Indian Trinidadian decent, Grenadian roots Francois Roberson (Laura Moriarty), “big big” red Head boy Alan Legros (Eddie Saunders), Concordia drama teacher Dez Gallant (Evan Taylor), lovely Kara Feifer ( Lisa ), Ara Carrerra (Christine), Karen Peterson (Charlie), Lana who was from BC or somewhere out west. The bad homeboys David Lipper (Kevin Waters) and (Mickey) Jason Lecavalier…and from Ontario sharing September 15Th b-day with me , mystery chick idol Intellectual musician Scott William Armstrong (James) who shaved his long ass hair and fucked off to India. He had some vibes issues to work out though (last seen by me in June ? 1993 when “my affiliation with “The Madhatter Library Pub” happened) .

The original synopsis originally written by Rhea Cohen was about High School Confidential, a brother and sister moving into a new town and all that shit…sound familiar? Then I think right after he was pissed of and stepped Harry sold off ideas or someone else “bite” the idea in “Beverley Hills”.

The crew was the bomb too! Floor manager Dominic Vanelli is a bomb producer and true grease behind RDC (Reseau des Sports) , Studio Camera 2 David Franco is notorious for Graceland 3000 and real Hollywood DOP A list movies, Alain Dahan , Philippe Spurelle, Christophe Flambord, Vincent Di Clemente, RIP Steven G Blanchard, David Blanchard, Pierre Henri, Lynn Picard, Terri Joseph Darryl and Anne back in BC (I am starting to lose some long term memory..too many joints joints !!!lol) where some of Concordia grads (Big Up Loyola!) who cut their teeth and went on as big killas in this dog eat dog industry across the country even the world! TOYL was their first real life break!

So I am happy to say but sadly …if that if this is true about Harry Jakobs… I took initiative to make up some peace with him (Like I said in 2002 September we went out for a drink…he didn’t drink though at a bar in the New Forum) to tell him I was sorry on behalf of the cast for chanting to kill him. He seemed quite reflective as I asked him why and what happened. We spoke of a possible reunion end to the story of Mickey and Laura 15 ish years later killing everyone at a bad high school reunion putting an end to the dead horse. I asked him for rights all to the foreign tapes.They still exist. By the way is Natalie Rosen still around? He was lonely and seemed aware of his fuck ups. I think he started to finally understand sometimes karma stinks. He spoke of girls and wanting to do something ..you know the spiel but like almost someone who was not all there either. Maybe that was his brain going. Ironically I lost his phone number but have an email address for him that seems to still be active.He hasn’t responded though maybe because…

What I think we should do is find those 130 episodes preserve them and put into a national Canadian cinema TV archive to show that Montreal could put shit even in together back in 1988.

Now I can’t speak for the other shit he put people through and if his is still around he could deserve a good cuff in he head but I could only speak for my own selfish experience of being a privileged and kick ass cast member of Canada’s first prime time syndicated soap opera Time of Your Life.

May 2007 will mark 19 years since the first auditions. We aired October 17th 1988. Today I am a better actor and way better producer because of the experience. I learnt not what to do from the worst. Simple.

Oh yes I remember May 1987 so long ago …so innocent.

May he rest in peace?

RIP Mark Feifer, Steven Blanchard

Thanks and peace to you Luke for letting me go off a bit if you have any question don’t hesitate to let me know whats up yo! Respect.

Sincerely

Richard Raybourne aka Matt Peters ( He was such a pussy and got none because Mickey punked him for Jessie! Bastard!)

We should have a cheesy dvd box set lol!

Posted in Hollywood | Comments Off on Harry Jakobs – The Time Of Your Life

My Connection To Anna Nicole Smith

From ExtraTV.com: Alexander DenkWatching Fox News Friday morning, I saw a familiar face and heard a familiar voiceAlexander Denk, Anna’s former bodyguard and boyfriend and possible father of her baby Dannielynn. I met Alexander in an acting class in 1994. I was homeless at the time. I’d stay a few nights a week with a woman I’d hooked up with but she kicked me out (after her friends, family and therapist advised her to). So I’d sleep in my car (Datsun 1979 station wagon) in Alexander’s parking lot in Beverly Hills and use his facilities. Denk worked as a chef at a luxury hotel around the corner (Santa Monica Blvd, near CAA). I was 27 and he was about 27. He was a bodybuilder from Austria. We both had accents and struggled in acting class but we had huge ambition. We were willling to do almost anything to get ahead in the entertainment industry. Alexander had a sharp-tongued landlady who’d almost reduce him to tears. Denk was a calm gentle guy. He spoke slowly. He saw himself as following in the footsteps of another bodybuilder actor – Arnold Schwarzeneger. Looking back, I realize that if I had just played my cards right, Anna Nicole Smith’s baby could’ve been mine.

Denk, who was Anna Nicole’s bodyguard for two years, first met the supermodel when he was cast as the chef on "The Anna Nicole Show.""I think it was an instant spark, and I think for her it was the same," he said. Denk claims he and Anna had a passionate love affair that lasted for two years. "She was wonderful," he insisted. "A very sensitive and emotional woman. A very good kisser, I must say." But Alexander told "Extra" that he knew Anna was in trouble the last time he talked to her two weeks ago, a conversation that now haunts him. "She was sick of being called names," he said. "Everyone was bashing on her and calling her names and putting her down and suing her." Now, only on "Extra," Denk breaks this stunning secret about Anna’s health that could affect the investigation into her death. He claims the reality TV star suffered from life threatening seizures, for which she was on medication. But Denk does not believe drugs were to blame for Anna Nicole’s death. "My opinion, I don’t think so," he told us. "I think she was exhausted." Then, Denk dropped the baby bombshell we never saw coming. When asked if Smith ever revealed to him the real father of Dannielynn, Denk responded, "She always told me she wanted to have her kids with me." So is there a possibility Denk is Dannielynn’s father? "There’s always a possibility," he insisted. Alexander hired prominent Beverly Hills attorney Cyrus Nownejad, and he made it clear he wants to raise Baby Dannielynn if she is his. But for now, his thoughts are with his lost love. "Poor Anna, Denk said through tears. "I hope she’s in peace wherever she is."

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on My Connection To Anna Nicole Smith

Sliding to the Right: The Contest for the Future of American Jewish Orthodoxy

Steven I. Weiss writes about Samuel Heilman’s new book:

Orthodoxy is set to become the dominant element in American Jewry in the next two decades, if it hasn’t already. Boasting vastly higher rates for all the significant matrices of Jewish involvement, as well as higher birth rates and retention of constituency from both assimilation and intermarriage, there is a case to be made that the Orthodox have taken not simply the denominational lead over traditional powerhouses Reform and Conservative Judaism, but are ready to grab hold of even the non-denominational groups that represent the heart of Jewish giving and communal organization, such as the United Jewish Communities. If the Orthodox weren’t at the top of the ladder when the most recent National Jewish Population Survey was conducted in 2002, the numbers it presented assured that Orthodoxy’s ascent is a given.

Dr. Heilman responds to Weiss: "I don’t understand what you think one gets from being quoted in the paper. For me, it translates to the barks and bites on this blog — nothing else of value. You may consider this disingenuous — why else would I talk to them? I do because I talk to everyone — even the people of this blog who have taken character assassination behind the veil of anonymity to a new height. If you want to debate with me directly, by all means do so. If instead you want to sling zingers from behind your pseudonyms in public, I suggest instead write your own books and articles. Of course you will have to find someone to publish this." I emailed Dr. Heilman for an interview last year. He did not respond. I will try again.

Posted in Judaism, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Sliding to the Right: The Contest for the Future of American Jewish Orthodoxy

Seek Good School System, With Not Too Many Black Kids

John Derbyshire writes on Jewcy.com:

House hunting in the New York suburbs in 1992, my (Chinese-born) wife and I were once sitting in the office of a realtor, an American lady, trying to spell out just what we were looking for. We had no kids at the time, but were moving to the burbs precisely to raise a family. Well, chatting with the realtor, I said that of course we wanted to be in a good school system, one with not too many black kids. The realtor’s reaction was similar to the one described by P.G. Wodehouse when he wrote: “Ice formed on the butler’s upper slopes.”

You don’t say things like that. You just do them: practically no white Americans, looking for a place where they can settle down and raise a family, will seek a school district that is majority black. In fact, that realtor, when she had thawed some, carried out what I am sure is her normal procedure of steering us well away from heavily black school districts.

Patterns of housing segregation in the U.S. speak for themselves, very eloquently. This is, however, the only way in which honest speech about race in America is allowed. (I believe, in fact, that if the realtor had said: “Don’t worry, I won’t waste your time and mine by showing you properties in heavily black neighborhoods,” she would have been breaking the law. Her behavior, however, was indistinguishable from what it would have been if she had said that, and meant it.)

Posted in Blacks, Education, Race | Comments Off on Seek Good School System, With Not Too Many Black Kids

Real Estate Magnate Aron Abecassis Leaving Etz Jacob

I hear Nancy Fields, former head of secular education at Harkham Hillel Hebrew Academy, is going with him. Abecasis is the president of the board. He received a glowing portrait in the June 9, 2006 Jewish Journal:

A go-getter who prospered in real estate, Abecassis had supported the school when he first heard it was having troubles making ends meet eight years ago. Then in 2004, when he learned of the impending bankruptcy, Abecassis took the school on as a personal mission.

Although his three children were enrolled at nearby Maimonides Academy, Etz Jacob’s plight touched a chord: Abecassis himself had once been a poor immigrant in search of a Jewish education. In 1970, his family fled Morocco because of the increasingly hostile climate for Jews. “We left everything behind,” said Abecassis, who was 9 years old at the time.

The family went to Canada, but when his father tried to find a Jewish day school for his three children, “they came up with all kinds of excuses not to admit us,” Abecassis recalled. “I always felt I missed the structure and foundation of a Jewish identity that comes through Jewish education.” In addition to donating his own funds, Abecassis created a business plan to save the school. He enlisted rabbis throughout the community to appeal to their congregants for help. He solicited individuals to provide $10,000 student sponsorships.

Abecassis donated about one million dollars to the school and raised far more than that. Like David Rubin (former president of Yavneh), Abecasis has put his money where his mouth is. I hear Abecassis was frustrated with the school’s pace of change.

A source writes:

I was forwarded your blog on Abecases and Etz Jacob. There are substantial errors of fact, which falsely imply a fault in the management of Etz Jacob.

From the misinformation, it appears that the principals of the school were not interviewed prior to your blog.

Please understand, the school does not want publicity on what is going on, as it is in serious negotiations with Mr. Abecasses, however, you should be aware of the facts and the reason for this message:

1. Aron’s giving to the school has been in some thousands of dollars… not even in the hundreds of thousands, let alone a million. Any such exaggeration is an attempt to steal underserved honor.

2. Aron required the founder of the school to sign a document that Aron’s largest funding of $75,000 is a loan, not a gift, to the school, increasing the school’s liabilities.

3. On the one hand, a year ago the school would have been foreclosed, but for Aron’s bailing it out. That is true, but then came the price:Aron insisted that the school fire all of its unaccredited teachers and hire only accredited ones. This was done under the protest of both the Religious Principal and the founder and dean of the school, as it tripled the annual budget. They accurately projected to him the dire consequences. Aron’s assumption, based on no experience in school administration, was that ‘if you build it, they will come’. He was proved completely wrong. 30 children of the higher tuition paying families went elsewhere when their favorite teachers were fired. As the school has an 18 year reputation, few new children came, resulting in tuition payments dropping by a third, while costs were tripled.

4. At the time of his decision, Aron publicly made it clear and reiterated subsequently that he would guarantee the funding of the school when he forced the school to hire the new staff.

5. When the need for donations to cover the deficit rose to $120,000 per month from last year’s $30,000, the community at large could not be mustered to such a new level. It is true that he raised a couple dozen gifts ranging from $5,000 to $25,000 (some in multiple payments), but this too amounted to only a couple hundred thousand dollars total. When he finished his list of easier ‘marks’, his fundraising efforts were diverted or trailed off.

6. When the time came, Abecasses’ promise was called. He then refused to give what was promised and is now negotiating another loan, but for far less than the school needs to survive.

7. The Founders of the school were forced by Aron into an unsustainable situation by no error of theirs.

8. It is important that when credit is given, positive or negative, that it be valid information. Responsible reporting requires that you verify the information that one person gives you before publication. In this instance, it appears that Aron is trying to make the case that he is not at fault that the school is in trouble. You missed this aspect and it was made to appear that the people left carrying the burden are at fault. This is slanderous.

Etz Jacob’s rabbi Rubin Hutler sent Aron Abecassis this letter of gratitude on March 25.

Posted in Education, Judaism, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Real Estate Magnate Aron Abecassis Leaving Etz Jacob

‘I Want You To Come To My Funeral Naked’

Rabbi Michael Broyde, a dayan (rabbinic judge) in the Beth Din of America, was in Los Angeles recently and he gave a lecture presenting four cases he’d presided over.

“One you’re going to hate me for,” he said at the beginning.

In the first case, he noted that it was generally a mitzvah to follow the wishes (be it a will or burial instructions or whatever) of someone who has died. But there are exceptions. If the person asks you to violate Jewish law, you don’t have to follow him.

“If he says, ‘I want you to come to my funeral naked,’ you don’t do that.”

“You don’t have to follow his wishes if it humiliates you.”

In this case, the woman could destroy the husband’s burial instructions and recuse herself from overseeing the burial.

Rabbi Broyde said he’s changed his burial wishes more often than he’s changed his will. At one time, he wanted to be buried with his congregants.

Now he believed that he and his congregants were going to different places.

Case four was the most interesting and got people the most angry.

Rabbi Broyde said that Leah, the 15yo girl, consented to the sex with Reuven, 55, and afterwards did not regret it. She did not want the matter made public (among other reasons, she did not want to get kicked out of her yeshiva). She would not assist in any prosecution of Reuven, be it before a Beit Din or a secular court.

Rabbi Broyde said that statutory rape with those over 14 are rarely prosecuted in the United States (particularly not in the state of New York where this took place), particularly if the minor and the minor’s parents do not cooperate.

By strictly halcachic reasoning, Reuven was entitled to a monetary settlement for the beating he took from Shimon and company.

Rabbi Broyde: “Reuven did not expect to get beaten up. He expected, at worst, to not get invited back.”

The Local Orthodox Rabbi (LOR) who told Shimon to get some people together and beat Reuven “paying particular attention during the beating to the body part of Reuven that committed this sin” would’ve loved to have been taken to court over this. The LOR said the instruction he gave was “the best given a very bad situation, and one that he would give again.”

Rabbi Broyde would not disclose the Beit Din’s ruling in this case.

He repeatedly described the case as a “Mexican standoff.”

Many of the women in the crowd got angry. They claimed that Reuven should be turned over to secular authorities who would prosecute him. They said they knew. They said the law of the land must be the law to the Jew.

Rabbi Broyde said that that rabbinic dicta demanding that Jews observe the law of the land applies only to laws enforced in the country. That statutory rape cases where the minor is over 14 are rarely prosecuted. Rabbi Broyde noted that he often broke the law speeding.

He said he is publishing an article in Hebrew permitting the use of marijuana by chemo-therapy patients (even though this violates federal law).

Rabbi Broyde said that if statutory rape laws were enforced, many shuls would lose a lot of congregants (because of the number of 18-year olds who have sex with those under 18).

Rabbi Broyde said you can’t criminalize consenting teenage sexuality. That Jewish law says that once you reach the age of bar mitzvah (13 for boys and 12 1/2 for girls) you are considered an adult and therefore there is no difference between a 15 yo girl having sex with a 16 year old or a 55 yo.

Rabbi Broyde said it is obviously not good for a 55yo to seduce a 15yo but it is not in itself a violation of Jewish law.

Many, perhaps most, of the women in the crowd were horrified by this and they loudly vented their feelings.

One thing that I love about Rabbi Broyde is that he does not seek to be liked. He just stood up there like a man and gave it to people straight.

Rabbi Broyde noted that he is a rabbi of a Young Israel shul and that it therefore has stricter standards than your run of the mill Orthodox Union shul.

Audience members kept wanting to change the details case but Rabbi Broyde insisted on dealing with the case as presented.

He refused to speak about things where he had no expertise.

Much of the female audience could not conceive of how a 15yo girl could have sex with a 55yo man and not regret it. They claimed that if she didn’t regret it, it was because she was a child not responsible for her choices.

One woman, who was a psychologist or something, said that 15 year old girls are not developmentally mature enough to choose to engage in sex.

Rabbi Broyde pointed out that 18 year old may not be mature enough to do many things yet by secular law they are adults, and by Jewish law, 13 year olds are adults.

Some took it for granted that this was the girl’s first sexual experience (which it probably was, said Rabbi Broyde).

After speaking for over an hour, Rabbi Broyde said the lecture was over and people were free to leave. But nobody left. They wanted to keep pounding him over this case.

Posted in Abuse, Judaism, Lectures, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on ‘I Want You To Come To My Funeral Naked’

Modern Orthodoxy

Sitting in shul, I raced through Edward S. Shapiro’s (he is the father of Marc B. Shapiro) 2005 collection of essays — We Are Many: Reflections On American Jewish History And Identity.

Here are excerpts of Shapiro’s essay in the Summer 2002 edition of Judaism magazine:

The tensions within Modern Orthodoxy were exhibited on a local level in the 1990s in Congregation Ahawas Achim B’nai Jacob and David of West Orange, New Jersey, the leading Orthodox congregation in Essex and Morris counties. I have been affiliated with the congregation since 1969 and, as an academically trained historian and an observer of the sociology of American religion, I have closely watched and thought about its growth. Indeed, much of my writing on American Judaism has come from viewing developments on the ground, so to speak, in West Orange. The evolution of the West Orange Orthodox community has, I believed, been a microcosm of important trends in the history of American Orthodoxy in general and of suburban Orthodoxy in particular. (15) AABJD had been moving slowly to the right during the past three decades. The square dances and concerts with female singers of the 1970s had disappeared from the congregation’s social calendar. Mixed dancing at the synagogue’s annual dinner ended in the early 1980s. The prayer books and bibles used by the synagogue reflected this rightward move. In the 1970s the synagogue used the Birnbaum siddur and the Hertz chumash. These were replaced in the 1980s by the siddur and chumash produced by ArtScroll. ArtScroll specializes in printing prayer books, biblical commentaries, hagiographic biographies, children’s books, and other works which reflect the anti-modernist mentality of sectarian Orthodoxy. These books are written in an execrable manner and edited by persons who disdain or are unaware of modern Jewish scholarship. Few of AABJ&D’s members seem to recognize the incongruity of a congregation of college graduates and professionals using such fundamentalist religious literature. The Rabbinical Council of America, the major rabbinic spokesmen of Modern Orthodoxy, even commissioned ArtScroll to produce a prayer book suitable for their congregations. “There is no small irony,” wrote the historian Jack Wertheimer, “in the fact that the RCA thus commissioned its opponents in th e Orthodox world–traditionalists who do not accept the legitimacy of centrist Orthodox rabbis–to provide its official prayer book.”

…By the early 1980s, however, most of the nominally Orthodox had either left the congregation or their children had grown up, and the congregation closed its Hebrew school. In addition, many observant Orthodox families had moved to West Orange. This winnowing process had changed the nature of AABJ&D’s membership from “fellow- traveling” to “card-carrying” Orthodox. Rabbinic tolerance of religious transgressions was no longer considered so virtuous. And, as the historian Jeffrey S. Gurock noted in 1998, congregational Orthodox rabbis “no longer feel the pressure to accommodate, or turn a blind eye towards the activities of the minority of graying non-observant members.”

…Candidate (3), whose image was suggestive of the yeshiva world, presented a special problem in this respect. During the interview process, he was asked his opinion of women’s prayer meetings at which they would read from Torah scrolls (he opposed them), and of women wearing slacks within the synagogue building (he hoped they would wear appropriate clothing when meeting with him). The feminist disquietude was not alleviated by the new rabbi’s first pre-Yom Kippur sermon. Here he emphasized the duty of husbands to buy their wives pretty clothes for the High Holy days. This offended some women in the congregation who felt they had more important roles than being the recipients of their husbands’ largesse, and it reinforced the sense that he did not understand why so many Orthodox women believed they were not being taken seriously as Jews.

Here are excerpts of Shapiro’s essay, “Orthodoxy in Pleasantdale” (a version of this was published in the Spring 1985 issue of Judaism):

It is not surprising that many of Pleasantdale’s Orthodox population are scientists because science poses less of a threat to traditional Judaism than do the humanities. One wonders whether religious fundamentalists gravitate to the sciences or whether science-oriented individuals find it easier to accept the intellectual demands of Orthodoxy. The scientific orientation of the Orthodox is responsible, in part, for the community’s intellectual flaccidity, a characteristic that…afflicts Yeshiva University…

The social background and religious commitment of Pleasantdale’s Orthodox determines the character of their children’s religious education. Actually, “education” is a misnomer. There is very little desire for education per se. Instead, education is viewed in its most pragmatic and instrumental sense. For the Orthodox, the university is a place where their children can be trained in a profession as expeditiously as possible. There is little understanding of the university years as a time for playing with ideas, for intellectual challenges, and for ideological dialogue. In fact, education, in contrast to professional training, is suspect since it is seen as a threat to religious pieties and could lead to intermarriage. This anti-intellectualism is strengthened by the social background of many of Pleasantdale’s Orthodox, which leads them to place in inordinate importance on financial success. Thus, many of Pleasantdale’s young end up at Touro, Stern College, or Yeshiva College, the triad of New York’s Orthodox colleges, where they will be safe from intellectual contamination…

…Status among the Orthodox comes in part from being more religious than one’s neighbor. This results in continual religious bickering…

…The laity are constantly on the alert for rabbinic religious transgressions that can be a source of status for themselves (”I am even more religious than the rabbi”). (pg. 146)

…If support for blacks is an ineluctable result of Jewish values, then one would expect that the most Jewish of American Jews — the Orthodox of Brooklyn — would be the most sympathetic towards blacks. The exact opposite, however, is true. Secure in their Jewish identity, they do not require close relations with blacks to define it. Their Jewishness rests on more substantial grounds.

…If the most Jewish of Jews are the least receptive to blacks, the Jews most supportive of blacks have often been alienated from Jewish culture and religion. (pg. 240)

…One can imagine the psychological impact on blacks of Eric Hoffer’s comparison of blacks and Jews. The example of Jews, Hoffer wrote, “shows what persistent striving and a passion for education can do…even in the teeth of discrimination. This is a fact which the Negro vehemently rejects. It sticks in his gullet… The Jew impairs the authenticity of the Negro’s grievances and alibis. He threatens the Negro’s most precious possession: the freedom to fail.”

…Jews needed blacks to authenticate their image of themselves as liberals, but blacks did not need Jews to authenticate their image of themselves as blacks. (pg. 243)

Blacks have resented Jews not because they did not do enough for them but because they did too much. (pg. 244)

In academia there is not one black scholar, apart from Julius Lester, a convert to Judaism, whose major field of interest is Jewish studies.

Posted in Judaism, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Modern Orthodoxy