Are You Dating Out Of Your League?

Reba Toney, a former call screener for the Dennis Prager radio show, now hosts a couple of talkshows of her own on Christian radio.

A single mom, she’s published a new book called "The Rating Game: The Foolproof Formula for Finding Your Perfect Soul Mate".

According to her MySpace page: "If you’re always getting dumped then you’re dating people who are too good for you. If you’re always dumping people then you’re dating people that are too good for you. . Use the Rating Games fun 1-10 scale in face, body, personality, and life situation. Learn how t rate yourself and others, so that you date only those who rate the same as you!"

Reba appeared on Dennis Prager’s show yesterday. She said to think of dating as like a job interview. You may not be qualified for dating certain people just as you may not be qualified for certain jobs. It doesn’t mean you’re a bad person. Your experience will be good for some people and not for others. You may be under or over-qualified for that person you want to date.

Dennis: I was mesmerized by this. I think it was in Psychology Today 20 years ago. Yale or somebody did a study at mixers and they found that most people did have a self-worth number and they would approach within the ballpark of what was available to that number.

I do this. It’s intensely painful but I often think of certain women as being out of my league (too beautiful or too classy or too accomplished) and other women as beneath me. I get a comfortable feeling with other women that I can land them. I’ve never broken out of this pattern. I’ve never dated anyone who I thought was out of my league for longer than a couple of months and I always got dumped.

Reba says women tend to understate their worth. They look in the mirror and see their flaws. Men look in the mirror and tend to exaggerate their worth.

I remember one beautiful female convert to Judaism telling me about the amazingly misplaced self-confidence of nebbishy Jewish men trying to pick her up. "Jewish men don’t know their level," she says. "They were raised by their mothers to believe they could be president of the United States."

So what happens when a man dates above his level?

Reba: "You see that all the time. The phrase that shows that it’s happening is, ‘She won’t stop nagging me.’ Well, you wanted someone better than you and you got it. Now she has expectations of you that you can’t meet."

Dennis: "You get what you’re dating."

Reba: "It’s not fair to marry someone expecting them to change."

Dennis: "How do you rate yourself?"

Reba: "In four areas: Face, body, personality, life situation. Rate yourself and then your exes. You rate what you think is a ten and then evaluate how close do you come to this. If you think Jessica Alba is a ten, then you rate yourself accordingly."

Dennis: "Looks matter more to men than to women."

Reba: "It does at the beginning…"

"The book came out of my experience with marriage."

"You can figure this out before you give someone your phone number."

Posted in Dating, Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Are You Dating Out Of Your League?

Vishnu Luke Visits First Happy Minyan Banquet

Behind my computer keyboard, I feel like Vishnu.

I feel like the All-Pervading essence, the master of—and beyond—the past, present and future, the creator and destroyer of all existences, one who supports, sustains and governs the Universe and originates and develops all elements within.

Venturing out of my dream world can be scary, particularly when I have to deal with Jews.

In yoga, I never feel like a weirdo. I feel safe. I have an open heart. I’m surrounded by friends. Everybody seems to get me. They laugh at my jokes. They’re not threatened by my blog.

Oy, here I go idealizing again. Next thing I know it, I will be devaluing some other group in my next paragraph. Where’s my lithium?

Now I’m heading into the Jews. It’s not just my religious community and cultural community and practical community, it is also my reporting beat. Do I put on my reporting hat tonight or do I encounter people with an open heart?

I made that decision long ago and I can’t escape the consequences of 12 years of blogging. By pouring myself out, I chose to enormously complicate my life. When I started publishing things that were not entirely positive about my community, I condemned myself to this furtive, fearful life.

The top secret location for the banquet tonight honoring Stuart and Enny Wax is the Gilmore Adobe at the Grove.

My friend walks in, gets a drink, turns to me and after some small talk and says, "Wow. This is more socially awkward than Bnai David.

"Look at this crowd. They’re dressing better for this banquet than for shul on Shabbos.

"Look at you. You used to lecture me that everyone should wear a suit to shul on Shabbos."

I hit the water hard, slamming down seven cups. Cocktails are the cruelest hour.

"Hi, I’m Levi. I see you at shul all the time. What’s your name? How long have you been coming to the Happy Minyan? How long have you been in LA? I’m from Australia. You’ve been to Australia? How did you like it? I heard on NPR recently that in a survey, Australian men were the least likely in the entire world to help with housework. Yeah, neanderthals. It’s like America in the 1950s. Those traditional sex roles. Yeah, it’s like Orthodox Judaism."

I run into a bloke who says that when he moved to the hood three years ago, my synagogue reviews were of great help to him finding his religious home.

The call to Mincha is my wake-up call. Before it was issued, I did what I liked. Now I am commanded.

I can’t just pray to God when I like, I have to pray now.

I remember that I chose to accept the call of Mount Sinai, that I signed on to a very particular program and now it is time to march.

The siddurim are all in Hebrew. I ask for help to find Mincha. When I find it, I get awfully confused because it is not configured like my beloved RCA Artscroll siddur.

I’m surrounded by a very particular group of people and I have a particular role and suddenly I feel keenly my loss of freedom, but I step up and meet my responsibilities, knowing that within ten minutes, I will no longer have to talk to God, I can talk to whoever I like.

Five minutes after I tell the waiter that I want the vegetarian option, I get my dinner. I dig in. It’s delicious.

Musician Peter Himmelman entertains us from the stage. The place is jammed. Over 200 people, mainly from the Happy Minyan but also a strong contingent from Bnai David.

"The Happy Minyan is the melting pot of shuls," says a friend.

Himmelman is relaxed and funny. "When I started becoming religious, people asked me, ‘Who m’kareved [brought closer] you?’ It’s like I’m some ham to be carved up.

"I was drinking some water during a concert and this woman says, "Say the bracha!’ I had already said shehakol before the concert. It covers me for the entire concert. These Jews, always wanting to educate."

There’s shushing. Himmelman does not approve. "Don’t shush anyone. If a speaker can’t hold your attention, he needs another job."

Rabbi Abner Weiss gives a poignant talk. "When I’m called before the HaKodesh Barchu one day and have to account for myself, one thing I’ll be able to say in my defense is that I had a hand in starting the Happy Minyan.

"I was talking to Stuie one Friday night and said we need a minyan like this. And the next Shabbat it started."

Rabbi Weiss ran Beth Jacob where the Happy Minyan got its start downstairs in 1995 and he sheltered the minyan during the next five years until he moved to England.

Rabbi Weiss has a lot of friends at the Happy Minyan and they streamed over to say hello during the evening.

Rabbi Weiss is now a practicing psycho-therapist and a pulpit rabbi in Westwood.

David Sacks, the number one preacher at the Happy Minyan, quotes Shlomo Carlebach that you shouldn’t need a reason to be happy.

I wander around until I find my friend. Then I take the spare seat next to him and think, "I love you, man. Do you know how often I think, I wonder what you will think of this post? You appreciate my hard work, man. You get me. I did have a good zinger yesterday, didn’t I? Did I ever tell you how often I don’t write things because I think, you won’t care for this. I write to you, man. I know you’re reading. Thank you. Thank you for being my friend in public and in private, in front of my face and behind my back, in good times and in bad."

Yedidya (John Blanton) gives a dvar Torah. In 1968, he was playing guitar for the Grateful Dead.

On the ride home, I find this post on my Facebook wall: "luke! missed you tonight! he told some amazing stories about yogi bhajan. cool guy."

I get out at the corner of Pico and Robertson and walk past my Kundalini friends celebrating Yogi Bhajan’s 80th birthday with tea and cookies.

Luke Thompson posts: "Hey Luke, have you seen the Tarantino movie yet? The world awaits your opinion as to whether or not it’s good for the Jews."

Posted in Happy Minyan, Personal | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Vishnu Luke Visits First Happy Minyan Banquet

Rita Pauker Vs. Rabbi Samuel Ohana

Here’s my Feb. 23, 2009 report on this dispute over four Torah scrolls.

The Jewish Journal reported April 15, 2009:

North Hollywood widow Rita Pauker plans to appeal a recent L.A. Superior Court decision that would bar her from reclaiming a set of Torah scrolls her late husband, Rabbi Norman Pauker, left in the care of his former colleague, Rabbi Samuel Ohana, when Pauker retired in the mid-1990s.

The move would be the latest chapter in a heated public saga pitting Rita Pauker against Ohana, who says the four sifrei Torah belong to his Sephardic Orthodox synagogue, Beth Midrash Mishkan Israel in Sherman Oaks. Pauker maintains the scrolls were merely on loan. Since her husband died in 2002, she has fought to have them returned to her in an increasingly bitter battle that spilled into the civil court system this year.

In an April 3 ruling, Superior Court Judge Zaven Sinanian reversed a January decision by a Los Angeles beit din, or rabbinic court,  that awarded Pauker the scrolls. Sinanian agreed with Ohana’s claim that one of the three beit din rabbis should have been disqualified from hearing the case because of statements he made in a 2007 Los Angeles Daily News article about the dispute.

Long in advance of the hearing, Rabbi Nachum Sauer, a top L.A. Orthodox arbiter, told then-Daily News reporter Brad A. Greenberg (now a senior writer for The Jewish Journal) that lending a Torah to a synagogue is a common mitzvah performed by Jews. “It is on long-term loan to their synagogue, but he still owns it,” Sauer was quoted as saying.

Ohana and his attorney, G. Scott Sobel, successfully argued to the Superior Court that the beit din’s ruling should be thrown out because Sauer failed to disclose that statement as a possible threat to his neutrality in the case.

Sinanian agreed in his ruling, saying, “Rabbi Sauer’s above-cited quotation could create a strong impression in the mind of a reasonable person that the matter had been prejudged by him.”

Sauer had told the court that the comment used in the article was “in response to a general inquiry, and not based on the facts of the instant dispute.”

Here’s Rita Pauker’s March 27 filing. Here’s Rabbi Ohana’s May 7 filing. Here’s Rita Pauker’s May 12 filing. Here’s Rabbi Ohana’s June 29 filing. Here is Rabbi Ohana’s July 2 filing.

In Rabbi Ohana’s June 29 filing, it says in note one: "It should be noted that the RCC Beit Din is composed of the same three above-named rabbis [Avrohom Union, Nachum Sauer, Gershon Bess] in virtually all cases…"

The Los Angeles Superior Court case number is BS119163. Most if not all of the documents in this case are available for purchase through LASuperiorCourt.org. Just register, give them your credit card information, and then enter the case number above. 

G. Scott Sobel is the attorney for Rabbi Ohana. Here is his July 14, 2009 submission. It contains a transcript of the July 8, 2009 hearing before Judge Sinanian.

Scott Sobel blasts the RCC as being prejudiced against his client. "We cannot stomach going back to that body [RCC] and asking that body to select three — obviously not independent, because they are dependent. They are part of the RCC. Rabbi Pauker himself is a member of the RCC, has been for many years, but he is not comfortable to put any decision-making process into the hands of the body which we believe we have amply demonstrated has shown prejudice, has violated the rules, has violated ex-parte rules, disclosure rules, and created the entire mess we’re in."

"…I am personally aware of at least two, if not three, cases previously where it’s my understanding that Rabbi Union authorized the plastering of such posters.

"Now, it’s commonly done in Jerusalem in such cases, but this is…a different place and a different situation, and this is not somebody who is going out and saying, the law does not apply to me."

"…And I believe we have shown there has been actual prejudice that Rabbi Union has made a veiled threat in writing; that Rabbi Union has said in a letter that my client brings embarrassment upon himself if he pursues the original case in which the court upheld Rabbi…"

"Rabbi Ohana said, I am in direct competition with Rabbi Union and the RCC. I have a Beit Din in the Valley…that is authorized by the Chief Rabbinic Court, Beit Din of Israel from Jerusalem. He’s been operating for a number of years. He conducts conversions under the auspices of his Beit Din in the Valley. He grants divorces…"

"And Rabbi Union’s made it very clear that his desire is that there only be one Beit Din in Southern California and it be the RCC Beit Din. And all others should cease and desist their work."

After this, the judge ruled that Rabbi Ohana must go back to the RCC for arbitration of this dispute.

Posted in R. Avrohom Union, R. Samuel Ohana, Rabbis, RCC | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Rita Pauker Vs. Rabbi Samuel Ohana

What Is Political Correctness?

Dennis Prager said on his show in February: Political correctness is entirely a matter of truths that can’t be said because they’re painful.

Political correctness is the inability to state certain truths because they may offend or cause pain to certain people and certain groups.

This is a difficult hour to do because it will entail offending certain sensibilities.

The issue about stereotypes is whether they are true and whether you apply the generalization to every member of the group, which is totally wrong. This is how you can live with stereotypes and not be a bigot.

The biggest example of truths that can not be said are the differences between men and women.

Posted in Dennis Prager, Politics | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on What Is Political Correctness?

Nobody Cares About The Accomplishments Of Your Kids

Nobody but you the parents and the grandparents.

The rest of us do not care.

Bumperstickers are trashy. Bumperstickers advertising that your kids are on an honor roll are obnoxious. Bumperstickers advertising that your kids have good attendance at their Martin Luther King Elementary School are pathetic.

Bragging about your kids is annoying.

"My child was inmate of the month at the state correctional facility."

"My kid sold your honor student all the answers to the tests."

Those stickers I love.

Dennis Prager tackled this issue on his radio show this week. Prager said he loved military bumper stickers — my son is in the US Navy. That’s a patriotic statement. We can live without honor rolls. We can’t live without the military.

There’s nothing wrong with being proud of your kids, but do you have to advertise it on your car bumper?

Dennis: I don’t see anything good about it and I see a fair amount that isn’t good about it.

Bragging about your child. I never liked it as a child.

What if parents went the full ten yards and said ‘Proud parent of a child at Harvard.’ Why not? That’s even more rare than being on the honor roll. My parents could’ve done that with my brother. They could’ve done that with me. I went to Columbia.

I would’ve blown up the car. Not with them in it. I wouldn’t have committed paracide over it.

With all the people I know, we would’ve died if our parents had bragged about us on a bumper sticker.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Nobody Cares About The Accomplishments Of Your Kids

Gran Torino

David Deutsch emails: Wasn’t it an awesome movie?  I love the way it’s totally unapologetic about Eastwood’s character, and that there’s really no character growth.  Essentially, he’s still the same racist misanthrope at the end, just one who’s extended the benefits of his protection to this one family.  After it was over, I went over all the places where it could have gone wrong–(could have reconciled with his sons, could have given his granddaughter the car, could have had a relationship with the neighbor, could have confessed to the priest, could have had scenes with his black best friend to show he’s not really so bad) but he really kept it true to the character.  And that last scene with him, nobody else could have pulled it off, because back in my head, there was that thought  of "it would be absurd for him to go nuts and start shooting up these guys–but he is Clint Eastwood…"

Aside from that how’s tricks?  We were in Israel much of the summer–even found myself in Mea Shearim at the start of a demonstration for the woman arrested for abusing her kid. I was with a Hasidic friend of mine, and I was walking around in a bermuda shorts, a bright red guyaberra, and a straw hat, sticking out like a fairly sore thumb. I turned to my friend and said "I don’t think anything’s going to happen, but right about now, I feel like a black man at a klan rally." I actually wanted to stay, but my friend was embarrassed and somewhat enraged by the whole thing, so we left.

Posted in David Deutsch | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Gran Torino

Lithuanian Jews Didn’t Wear Their Tzitzit Out

Rabbi Gil Student posts: The Jewish Press had a review a few weeks ago of Minhagei Lita: Customs of Lithuanian Jewry by R. Menachem Mendel Poliakoff. In the book, the author discusses the customs he observed in Lithuania in the 1930s. Here is an interesting quote from the review (link):

For instance, on page 63 of Minhagei Lita: Customs of Lithuanian Jewry, Rabbi Poliakoff writes, "No one in Lithuania wore his tzitzis hanging out as people do today – not even the Rabbonim, not even in Radin."

DF posts: I read this book, and also know the author quite well from my Baltimore days. [Though he does not know me.] This book is classic Rabbi Poliakoff. I absolutely love it. He even spends quite a bit of pages detailing the precise tunes and nusach of the davening in Telshe.

I was surprised to see him advocating for the abolishment of yomtov sheni, but happily surprised. He’s quite right, of course, that we have no business keeping it today, all terutzim and lomdishe justifications nonwithstanding. Many orthodox Jews feel this way, and I’m sure many rabbonim feel the same way too, privately. It’s rare to see an orthodx rabbis say so publicly in a book. I guess when youre in your 90s, kenanyhora, you pretty much dont care what anyone says anymore.

Rabbi Ari Enkin posts: I remember once seeing from what seemed to be a reliable source that the Mishna Berura which says that tzitzit must be worn out was inserted by students and not written by the Chafetz Chaim himself.

In any event, it does seem that the C.C. himself did not wear his tzitzit out.

Doesnt bother me too much though, even R’ Moshe didint follow everything written in the Igros Moshe.

MOSHE DAVID POSTS: The M.B. is simply quoting the Magen Avraham.

It’s known that the M.B. did not do everything he writes. The classic example is his kiddush cup which is smaller than his shiur.

There seems to be an assumption, though, by the reviewer that people wear their tzitzis out because they think this is what was done in Lithuania. I think that assumption is incorrect. I think people wear their tzitzis out because the M.B. says to, period.

An issue that the reviewer did not mention is standing during chazaras hashatz. I don’t know what the custom was in Lithuania but the M.B. writes to stand during chazaras hashatz. Yet, RSZA once said regarding standing during chazaras hashatz that this was a minhag in some places in Europe and in Hungary the custom was to sit.

David emails: Rabbi Kaminetsky, in his book, Making of a Gadol, records that Lituhuanina Jews who decided to let their tzitzith hang out were dismised from the Yeshival. I don’t recall the page but it is in there. So much for this “frumkeit/halachah” not known to our Lithuanian great Rabbis.

Posted in Hirhurim | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Lithuanian Jews Didn’t Wear Their Tzitzit Out

Robert Novak’s Jewish Roots

Nachum Lamm posts: Wikipedia (I know, I know) tells us:

"Novak’s parents had a Jewish background, but they avoided interaction with their local Jewish community and rarely attended religious services. Neighbors falsely considered Novak’s family to be Polish."

And this tidbit:

"Because of the constant family attention, his cousins mockingly called him "Baby Jesus"."

Doesn’t sound like a family committed to any sort of Judaism, even a liberal one. He did join AEPi, though.

CONCERNED POSTS: Unfortunately, this is not an isolated event. Many prominent conservatives, including Marvin Olasky, who invented the term "compassionate conservative" converted to Christianity from Judaism because they associated Judaism with liberalism due to the "synagogue" they attended.

Most non-Orthodox Hebrew schools today spend most of time teaching about environmental causes and global warming. If someone is astute enough to realize he is being manipulated and brainwashed, he won’t have an interest in Judaism as he will associate it with left wing nonsense.

Most non-Orthodox Hebrew schools today spend most of time teaching about environmental causes and global warming. If someone is astute enough to realize he is being manipulated and brainwashed, he won’t have an interest in Judaism as he will associate it with left wing nonsense.

When the arrests were made of American born black converts to Islam who were caught in a sting operation to bomb Synagogues in Riverdale and kill Jewish children, the female "Rabbi" of one of the targeted institutions was quoted in The Jewish Week as saying "I see no anti-semitism here, only lack of equal opportunity".

The fact of the matter is that liberalism IS a mental disorder. If young unaffilated Jews identify this mental disorder with Judaism, they will never have an interest in Judaism (unless they themselves have this mental disorder.)

CHARLIE HALL POSTS: I realized that if one is so devoted to a particular ideology, it is likely that exposure to Orthodox Judaism will not be a fit. There are lots of things in Torah that are a serious challenge to the ideology of each and every political perspective, at least as seen in the United States. That the Torah is pretty unconcerned about rights and individual autonomy is a direct challenge to the worldview of most of 20th and 21st century liberalism. That the Torah imposes significant obligations on both individuals and on the community as a whole to provide for the poor, sick, and not-yet-educated and restricts free markets is a direct challenge to the worldview of laissez-faire. There are certainly many more examples, but I will personally say that one of the many things that makes Torah great is that it is (or should be) a challenge for all of us.

Posted in Judaism, Politics | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Robert Novak’s Jewish Roots

Why The Housing Boom Went Bust

I’m reading this new book by economist Thomas Sowell — The Housing Boom and Bust.

He writes that "the idea that lenders would be offended by receiving monthly mortgage payment checks in the mail from blacks should at least give us pause. It should also be noted that a substantial majority of both blacks and whites had their mortgage applications approved."

Lenders are in business to make money. If they can make money lending to blacks, they will.

Statistical differences between groups are common and they can’t all be accounted for by discrimination.

To fight this alleged discrimination, lawmakers imposed a lowering of lending standards across the board to people of all races, thus preparing the ground for the housing boom and bust.

The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 came to mean that regulators would impose quotas on lending and lenders had to find "innovative or flexible standards" to meet those quotas.

Banks are federally regulated. They need government permission to many things that other businesses can do on their own. Banks had to meet a "satisfactory" rating for lending to minorities to diversify into selling investment securities or affiliating with insurance firms.

In 1993, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) began bringing lawsuits against lenders who declined a higher percentage of black applicants than whites. Lenders responded rationally by lowering their down payment and income requirements.

Read On.

Posted in Economics, Thomas Sowell | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Why The Housing Boom Went Bust

Major Disconnect Between Whites & Blacks On Dogs

Skip Bayless, my favorite sports commentator, said on ESPN today: There’s a major disconnect between the way whites and blacks view dogs. For most blacks, dogs are just animals. For most whites, such as myself, dogs are part of the family. I’ve let my dogs sleep in my bed, kiss me on the mouth, and eat food off my plate. I’ve never seen a black person at an animal rights rally. I’m sure there have been but I don’t remember seeing any.

Blacks think that torturing and killing dogs is wrong but that it is not worth two years in prison.

Rob Parker: I loved my dog but I never think about him in terms of  "Rest in Peace."

Luke says: I don’t get white people in this respect. I think they’re nuts. Oy, the things white people think, such as that pets are "part of the family."

Monica Showalter writes on my Facebook: My spanish teacher was a mexican from tijuana who was educated in the US. He said that when he was first getting used to US culture, he was appalled at his roomate, putting up on his mantle a portrait of his mother and a portrait of his family dog. He said that was the grossest thing he ever saw and it was not done in Mexico.

During the 1991 Oakland fires, a Yugoslav immigrant was quoted in the news as being appalled that in the great evacuations down the narrow wooded fiery roads, the good people of Piedmont, mostly whites, prioritized saving their dogs over their family possessions. Dogs were the first thing people sought to save. ‘It’s just a dog!’ the Yugi said – adding that they should be saving their furniture and other possessions as any sensible Yugi would do.

Anastasia Mendez writes: My uncle took his new pup to training classes twice a week and only fed him the best food, never allowing any sort of table scrap in case it upset his digestion.

I know of a white person (egads!) who has his apartment full of fighting dogs that bark all day and night, are left out in the rain, appear to be malnutrition. Neighbors have been petitioning animal control for months to have the dogs removed.

Cultural differences are one thing — as Monica has demonstrated — but the terms "black" and "white" are far too encompassing, don’t ya think?

GINA POSTS: I live in Mexico, and whenever our dog gives us any problems our relatives seem to be appalled that we don’t just go dump him on the side of the road like they did with their pain-in-the-ass dogs. It’s considered to be a frivolous waste of money to take them to the vet or to spend money on training. I can’t even imagine what they’d say if I put a framed picture of my stupid dog up in my house!

MONICA POSTS: I think pet-love is a function of affluence. In China, people eat cats. In Hong Kong, they have pet protection societies and nothing is too good for fluffy.

But I think it’s also an anglo-saxon thing, and the more you are exposed to the culture, whatever your race, the more likely you are to consider pets people. Nobody gets gushier about animals Read Morethan the Brits, absolutely nobody. They go all soggy around animals, they invented animal protection societies and the most militant vegetarians out there are Brits. Around the issue of whaling, for instance, I read a stiff, contemptuous statement by a Japanese government official, dismissing british concerns about whaling, saying it was merely the thinking of Brits, "based on the Anglo-Saxon belief that whales are people." The Japanese didn’t know quite what else to make of it.

DAVID WRIGHT WRITES ABOUT WHY BLACK PEOPLE SUPPORT MICHAEL VICK:

For Black people, the lingering image of the entire affair isn’t one of electrocuted, shot or “raped” pit bulls. It’s the image, endlessly broadcast on TV, of the overwhelmingly white crowd—mob, in fact—protesting outside the Falcons’ Atlanta training facility with chants and placards, one of which prominently reads: “Neuter Vick.”

Vick is a Black man, Georgia and Virginia, the sites of much of the protest, are in the South, and the tragic, real and recent history of the Black men in the South is that many, many of them ended up hanging from trees, savaged by jeering white mobs, men, women and even children who later posed for photographs beneath the mutilated and often “neutered” corpses.

Posted in Animals, Blacks, Race | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Major Disconnect Between Whites & Blacks On Dogs