I had three of them in my arms last night.

I had three of them in my arms last night.

Helpful writes: Given the current economic situation coupled with Luke’s spotty employment history, shabby appearance and questionable work ethic I can see the following as viable career opportunities for our hero:



In his second hour, Dennis Prager received a call from a man who said: I believe we have a Biblical mandate to go forth and multiply. We don’t have a Biblical mandate to go forth and be happy in carnal physical relationships.
Did that call remind me of my childhood. Sheesh, I’m glad I’m out of Christianity and into carnal Israel.
Dennis: God’s first proclamation is that it is not good for man to be alone. God could’ve made him children, but children don’t assuage loneliness. A partner does.
Helpful writes: Have you considered being a life coach? You could inspire others through your words and deeds.
I’ve suspected for sometime now that Luke has been vending his seed through one of these celebrity look-a-like sperm banks. How much does a wad of "Acid Washed Brad Pitt" semen cost these days?
Sadly, Luke has devolved into a 21st century Willie Lohman. Swap sales for blogging.
You can’t go anywhere online these days with being affronted by yet another hand-wringing essay, speech, or diatribe about how screwed we will all be when "journalism" disappears (today’s is from Leonard Downie of the Washington Post).
Of course, these tales of woe aren’t really about "journalism," at all. They’re about newspapers and change.
"Journalism" is alive and well, as evidenced by the still-robust health of companies like Bloomberg and Reuters, the survival of the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and other great news organizations, the hyper-growth of online news and commentary sites, and the rise of social media. And change is inevitable.
It bears noting that, almost without exception, these hand-wringers are written by people who run or own newspapers. Thus, in the interest of fairness, they should probably be accompanied by a disclaimer that goes something like this:
And, yes, if we don’t save newspapers, my fortune, ego, and life’s work will go down the tubes, my shareholders will get killed, and many of my employees will get sacked–and like hell I’m going to let that happen without a fight.
The Internet is doing to the news business the same thing it has done to dozens of other industries: disrupting it. Specifically, it is taking an old, inefficient system and making it much faster and more efficient.
COLUMBIA, S.C. — Two Republican county officials in South Carolina have apologized after they disparaged Jews in a newspaper op-ed in support of a fiscally conservative U.S. senator.
The chairmen, Edwin Merwin Jr. and Jim Ulmer, wrote the newspaper in backing Republican Sen. Jim DeMint’s opposition to congressional earmarks.
"There is a saying that the Jews who are wealthy got that way not by watching dollars, but instead by taking care of the pennies and the dollars taking care of themselves," according to the piece published Sunday in The Times and Democrat of Orangeburg.
DeMint called the comment thoughtless and hurtful Tuesday, and one of South Carolina’s two Jewish legislators, Democratic state Sen. Joel Lourie, said he was outraged.
"The words of these key Republican leaders are disgusting, unconscionable and represent prejudice in its purest form," said Lourie, D-Columbia.
He initially called for the chairmen to be removed but later said it was time to move past the issue.
Dennis Prager said on his radio show today: As a Jew who has probably done more for the Jewish people than Joel Lourie, having written the most widely-used introduction to Judaism and brought tens of thousands of Jews with an increased identity with Judaism and the Jewish people, and having written hundreds of articles about Judaism, and spoken in about 400 synagogues over the course of my lifetime, and written a book on anti-Semitism which Harold Kushner says is the best book written on anti-Semitism, I think I have some credibility in saying that [Joel Lourie] is a liar, that he said these things for political gain, and used his Jewishness to crap on Republicans. I find that offensive, just as when blacks use their blackness to crap on Republicans and conservatives, hiding behind the racism charge.
"If I find it disgusting when blacks do it, I find it disgusting when fellow Jews do it. This Joel Lourie is disgusting and unconscionable and is using the terrible evil of anti-Semitism to gain political points.
"What’s unconscionable is when people advocate hurting the Jewish people. What’s unconscionable is when professor Tony Judt says there shouldn’t be a Jewish state and he gets invited by Jewish groups to speak.
"What is anti-Semitic, what is unconscionable and disgusting [about the original remark]? The whole point is that their senator James DeMint is emulating Jews who got wealthy. Is Joel Lourie arguing that Jews are not wealthy? Of course there are many poor Jews and to the Jewish community’s great credit, they take care of poor Jews through the Jewish federations and through Jews’ being extremely charitable, but the Jews…are per-capita the best-off ethnic group in America.
"What’s wrong with that? The beauty of Americans is that people don’t say wow, they’re bad, they say, why don’t we emulate them? But in the liberal’s mind, that doesn’t work. Liberals don’t like the wealthy. A liberal Democrat like this guy Joel Lourie, he thinks that as soon as you say someone’s wealthy, it’s a bad thing because t’s a bad thing to liberals because they are jealous of wealthy people even if they are wealthy.
"It’s so sick what the Left does.
"Lourie undermines the battle against real anti-Semitism by cheapening it for political gain."
A caller, Kim in Atlanta, says he’s delighted Dennis is defending the use of the stereotype of "penny-pinching Jews."
Dennis: If you want to be hyper-sensitive and retreat into the belief that people are out there to get the Jews in the most Jew-friendly country that Jews have lived in history, then live in your paranoia. I don’t share it.
This saying might come from an anti-Semitic basis, but I don’t think these two chairmen are perpetuating anti-Semitism. It is an acknowledgment that there are Jews who have attained wealth. A lot of people would like to emulate the good values Jews do. If they want to emulate it, why would they think it’s bad?
Solomon Dwek, whose secret cooperation in a New Jersey corruption and money-laundering probe led to criminal charges against 44 people, pleaded guilty Tuesday to bank fraud and money-laundering charges.
The plea by Mr. Dwek, a 37-year-old real-estate developer, came after authorities in July arrested public officials and religious leaders — including several New Jersey mayors and rabbis in New Jersey and New York — based largely on recordings Mr. Dwek made on behalf of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Rabbi Gil Student comments: "Weissman’s point is that limiting the pool of potential wives will only cause MORE men (and therefore women) to remain single as long as their behaviors (such as being extremely picky about a long list of items such as yichus, tablecloths, dress size, etc.) remain the same. And if you change those behaviors, you might solve the problem without resorting to the age issue."
"Age is only a symptom of a larger problem: noses stuck in the air. If we viewed others as people and not objects then we would have many more shidduchim. We would be more concerned about character than about age and socio-economic status. Instead of emphasizing age, as this proposal does, we should be telling young men that they need to focus on character and not side issues."
EJ posts: I think men marry women younger than themselves across the board…Jews of every stripe and non Jews all across America. I once read the number is around five years. Furthermore my understanding is that marrying down has been confirmed numerous times.
If this statistic is true for Western countries in general then a psak by gedolim might not work. The ability of men to satisfy their desire for a yonger spouse might have deeper roots than habit.
Here’s a Wikipedia page that gives the average age of males and females at first marriage for various countries around the world:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Age…_first_marriage
What you see is that in most places, men marry women who are younger. In "traditional" societies the gap is greater; in secular societies it is less.
DF posts: 1) I dont think anyone believes the 41% in the survey. It is impossible to define "orthodox’, so straightaway the survey can be thrown out.
2. Very few people think of themselves as "picky". One man’s "picky" is another’s "basic standards".
3. In any event, Gil, why blame the pickyness on the guys? There are plenty of girls with unrealistic expectations. That’s true of both the ones wanting learners, and the ones wanting "learners & earners". And girls can be shallow too when it comes to looks, you know. [To use your concept – I personally do not think it is shallow to be makpid on looks.] To the extent you can blame anyone for their standards, both chromosones are equally at fault.
4. Attempting to manipulate guys into marrying older girls is disturbing. I see trouble on the horizon. The fact it, young yeshivah bachurim are naive – as are young men generally, believe it or not – and can easily be pushed into something they shouldnt be doing. Not every shadchan knows the line between pushing and encouraging. I can easily see zeolous shadchanim manipulating guys into questionable matches, to comply with what the rabbis are telling them.
5. Age is not just a wart that can be overlooked, if we train our kids the right way. There are people who draw the line at fertility at 35, for medical reasons. The medical research is sound. Marrying older girls shortens the window of opportunity. Stated from a frum angle, the chance to be mikayem the mitzvah of piryeh virivyeh is curtailed.
Y. AHARON POSTS: I, too, agree with F-P’s take on the Weissman article. The rabbis whom he criticizes don’t presume to provide a solution to the gender imbalance among single, marriageable OJs – just a more easily obtainable measure to alleviate it in Hareidi circles. Calling the rabbinic proposal a "Ponzi scheme" and attributing the imbalance to a bias in birth gender is simply foolish.
One proposal for Hareidi parents that the rabbis in question would never consider is to teach their marriageable daughters to disregard what they have been taught in their Hareidi schools and to consider dating guys who are in or have graduated college. That would expand their opportunities for both marriage and financial security.
CHAIM AMALEK EMAILS ME: "What are you doing to solve the shidduch crisis? Isn’t it time you stood up to the plate and married some old maid chassid woman of 20?"
Hillary Johnson writes in the New York Times:
The illness became famous after an outbreak in 1984 around Lake Tahoe, in Nevada. Several hundred patients developed flu-like symptoms like fever, sore throat and headaches that led to neurological problems, including severe memory loss and inability to understand conversation. Most of them were infected with several viruses at once, including cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr and human herpesvirus 6. Their doctors were stumped. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the nation’s presumed bulwark against emerging infectious diseases, dismissed the epidemic and said the Tahoe doctors “had worked themselves into a frenzy.” The sufferers, a C.D.C. investigator told me at the time, were “not normal Americans.”
When, by 1987, the supposed hysteria failed to evaporate and indeed continued erupting in other parts the country, the health agency orchestrated a jocular referendum by mail among a handful of academics to come up with a name for it. The group settled on “chronic fatigue syndrome” — the use of “syndrome” rather than “disease” suggested a psychiatric rather than physical origin and would thus discourage public panic and prevent insurers from having to make “chronic disbursements,” as one of the academics joked.