Yisroel Pensack: Should College Have Asked Court to Evaluate Student Who Became Tucson Shooter?

A New York Times article by A. G. Sulzberger and Trip Gabriel notes:

TUCSON — Many people had a glimpse of the deep delusions and festering anger of Jared L. Loughner, but none seemed in a better position to connect the dots than officials at Pima Community College.

After the release of detailed reports the college kept of Mr. Loughner’s bizarre outbursts and violent Internet fantasies, the focus has turned to whether it did all it could to prevent his apparent descent into explosive violence.

In September, Pima suspended Mr. Loughner and told him not to return without a psychologist’s letter certifying that he posed no danger. But it took no steps to mandate that he have a psychiatric evaluation, which in Arizona is easier than in many states.

Laura J. Waterman, the clinical director of the Southern Arizona Mental Health Corporation in Tucson, criticized Pima officials for not seeking an involuntary evaluation. “Where does it reach a level where you say this person shouldn’t be a part of any community and we have a responsibility to do something about that?” she said…

In a previous post, headed “Arizona Assassin Should Have Been in Psychiatric Treatment,” I wrote that “the real issue underlying the Arizona congressional assassination attempt and mass-murder tragedy [is] an insane legal system that largely leaves it up to psychotics themselves to decide whether to seek or undergo treatment for their mental illness[.]”

Arizona law, however, provides that “Any responsible individual may apply for a court-ordered evaluation of a person who is alleged to be, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to self or to others, persistently or acutely disabled, or gravely disabled and who is unwilling or unable to undergo a voluntary evaluation.”

The key language in the Arizona statute is not the phrase “a danger to self or to others,” which is a typical legal standard, or the words “gravely disabled,” but rather the lower legal threshold of “persistently or acutely disabled.” Additionally, just about anyone can ask the Arizona courts to compel an evaluation of someone’s mental state.

In an article headed “Before Tucson rampage, a powerful law went unused,” Andrew Longstreth of Reuters Legal writes:

As evidence mounts that Jared Lee Loughner exhibited disturbing behavior months before the rampage in Tucson, it’s increasingly clear that Arizona authorities could legally have detained him for psychiatric evaluation and treatment — and potentially have been able to avert the tragedy. But officials in other states might not have had that power…

Arizona has one of the least restrictive laws when it comes to detaining apparently mentally ill people against their will. Under the state’s broad involuntary-commitment statute, the government can mandate in-patient treatment for anyone determined to be “persistently or acutely disabled.” That could include a broad range of seemingly troubled individuals. By comparison, many other states limit involuntary commitment only to people shown to be a danger to themselves or others, or who are found to be completely unable to take care of themselves…

In Arizona, virtually anyone who had suspected that Loughner had mental problems and needed help could have filed an application to a state-licensed healthcare agency for a court-ordered evaluation…

The area of involuntary-commitment law highlights a tension within any democracy: balancing the rights of the individual against public-safety concerns. A landmark 1979 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, Addington v. Texas, made it harder for the government to commit people against their will, requiring officials to justify any such detention with “clear and convincing” evidence. Earlier, the standard had been a “preponderance of the evidence,” which is used in most civil cases…

When states first enacted statutes relating to involuntary commitment — in the late 1960s and early 1970s — the emphasis was on protecting the rights of the mentally ill. But beginning in the 1980s, partly in response to John Hinckley’s assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan, the pendulum started to swing the other way. Some states began amending their laws to broaden the range of circumstances under which an individual could be involuntarily committed.

Arizona amended its law in 2002, and the statute’s constitutionality has never been challenged…

Posted in New York Times, Yisroel Pensack | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Yisroel Pensack: Should College Have Asked Court to Evaluate Student Who Became Tucson Shooter?

A Possible Career Avenue

Fred emails: Believe it or not, I think that Luke should go into competitive sports. Here is an article about an athletic event for which our boy, with his unique and vast experience, might very well proper.

Khunrum emails: We’re being bombarded by the controversy concerning the shooting in Arizona. To arm or not to arm. You gents recall way back when Luke was being threatened by outraged **** stars. Our boy’s life seemed to be in peril. I don’t recall what his alleged sins were but the well was poisoned as they say. Any moment outraged *** reprobates might have descended on the hovel with torches, pitchforks and a rope. Then Luke let it be known he was packing heat. He even posted pics of himself with clouded thorazene eyes holding his “piece”. That seemed to scare the blighters off. So I guess in this instance, when Luke’s person was in peril, firearms saved the Jew, No? Hmmmm! Was Luke a Jew back then?

Posted in Personal | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on A Possible Career Avenue

Memorial for Tucson Victims

From BigGovernment.com:

In an exclusive statement, famed attorney and Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz defended Sarah Palin’s use of the term “blood libel” from multiple detractors. As the Media Matters/MSM/Democrat narrative on the Tucson tragedy unravels, they are getting a lot more desperate in their attacks on Palin. Fortunately, there are still plenty of honest liberals around:

The term “blood libel” has taken on a broad metaphorical meaning in public discourse. Although its historical origins were in theologically based false accusations against the Jews and the Jewish People,its current usage is far broader. I myself have used it to describe false accusations against the State of Israel by the Goldstone Report. There is nothing improper and certainly nothing anti-Semitic in Sarah Palin using the term to characterize what she reasonably believes are false accusations that her words or images may have caused a mentally disturbed individual to kill and maim. The fact that two of the victims are Jewish is utterly irrelevant to the propriety of using this widely used term.

From DennisPrager.com:

Thursday, January 13, 2011 Radio Show
H1: Memorial for Tucson Victims
The President gave an excellent speech last night, honoring the dead and wounded in Tucson. Unfortunately, the tone of the speech was not in line with the tone of largely student crowd who cheered inappropriately throughout. Did they not know they were at a memorial event?… As Dennis predicted, the Left zoned in on Sarah Palin’s “blood libel” phrase in her remarks regarding the Tucson tragedy. Their criticisms make very little sense at best and are despicable at worst.

Thursday, January 13, 2011 Radio Show
H2: Blood Libel
Dennis wonders why the Left so despises Sarah Palin. He has theories and so do callers, but ultimately, it’s emotional and irrational… The Left has no compunction about lying if it thinks those lies will damage Conservatives. Never has this been clearer than this week… Dennis plays a few clips from the President’s speech last night.

Thursday, January 13, 2011 Radio Show
H3: Maher Libel
Bill Maher, like most on the Left, has no trouble assigning blame to the Right for the Tucson murders even as he admits there’s no “direct” connection and that the murderer is a “a nut.”… Dennis talks to Burton Folsom, professor of history at Hillsdale College in Michigan and senior historian at the Foundation for Economic Education in Irvington, New York. His latest book is New Deal or Raw Deal?: How FDR’s Economic Legacy Has Damaged America.

New Deal or Raw Deal?

Dennis talks to Burton Folsom, professor of history at Hillsdale College in Michigan and senior historian at the Foundation for Economic Education in Irvington, New York. His latest book is New Deal or Raw Deal?: How FDR’s Economic Legacy Has Damaged America.

FLASHBACK: “Death Panels” Return

The Obama Administration couldn’t get want they want written into the legislation, so they just wrote it into the regulations.

Fear Males

Males have come to be regarded as dangerous predators, objects to be feared. This is the Politically Correct, hyper-feminized world in which we live. Sad.

Krauthammer: Yes, It’s a Libel

Charles Krauthammer is so disgusted with what the Left has tried to do with the Arizona tragedy that he writes a special column. He reviews the facts and makes his usual airtight case: the Left has libeled the Right. Don’t miss the last line. Devastating.
Posted in Dennis Prager, Sarah Palin | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Memorial for Tucson Victims

Wrestling With My Sexuality

Professor D.G. Myers writes:

What I am suggesting is that the two treatments of dialogue in the contemporary novel—the scrupulous mimicry of everyday speech and the studied exclusion of differing points of view—are connected at the level of basic assumptions about the nature of fiction in today’s literary culture. Reading Luke Ford’s interview with Robb Forman Dew, I was struck by the following exchange:

Luke: “Do you have any friends who are conservative Republicans?”
Robb, quickly: “No. I don’t think I could. Are you?”
Luke: “Yes.”
Robb: “You are? You really are? Oh no. You can’t be.”
In the interview, conducted four years ago, Dew supplies the premise to her brand new novel Being Polite to Hitler. When she was a child, she explains, two things broke her family apart—“religion and Hiroshima and Nagasaki.” Her uncle Brent, an “airplane navigator in the Pacific,” supported Truman’s decision to drop the bombs on Japan. “My father thought there was no excuse for dropping a bomb like that on a civilian population,” she recollects. “That the government should’ve dropped it on an unpopulated island and said, ‘This is what will happen.’ ” Brent dismissed the idea as “romantic.”

In Being Polite to Hitler, the horror of the atomic bomb is the psychological landscape of the novel.

Robb Forman Dew comments:

Just to be clear about my comment to Luke Ford, he had telephoned me out of the blue some years ago to discuss homosexuality, because I was a member of PFLAG at the time, and he said he was wrestling with his sexuality. I had no idea I was being interviewed, although I agreed to do an interview with him at some time.

But let me assure you that I can well imagine a person who believes the decision to use atomic weapons to end the War in the Pacific was the only choice to be made–I haven’t decided what I think about it myself.

Posted in Sex | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Wrestling With My Sexuality

My Former UCLA Classmate Is Now A Lieutenant Colonel In The U.S. Army

In the fall of 1988, I believed life could be normal again. I hoped to find a doctor who’d discover what was wrong with me and then I would return to the action full bore.

I took three classes in my first semester at UCLA — second semester Calculus, European Economic History and beginning Japanese.

I met Arnold Strong in my Japanese language lab.

Japan was all the rage in the late ’80s. According to Paul Kennedy‘s 1987 book, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, it was poised to become the world’s superpower.

We were only supposed to talk Japanese in our language lab but none of were proficient, so we kept lapsing into Spanish.

There was a bloke there named Klein who was 32 years old. We thought it was weird that he was an undergraduate at age 32. The rest of us were around 20.

Arnold Strong and I had a similar sense of humor. He was an English major while I was an Economics major.

One day in language lab, the teacher held up pictures. We were supposed to add “des” to the end of a name. When the teacher pointed at Arnold Strong, I said “Gorillades.”

For some reason, everybody cracked up and that became his primary name to me.

After eight weeks, my unredeemed Chronic Fatigue Syndrome forced me to drop all of my classes but European Economic history. The entire school year, I finished but three classes.

It was frustrating to see everybody else move ahead with their lives while I only went backwards.

Arnold was my age but he was poised to graduate. It never occurred to us to try to stay in touch.

In the late summer of 1999, I got a call from Oregon. The man identified himself as “Gorillades.” He’d just read my profile in Rolling Stone magazine and it made him laugh.

We whooped it up for a few minutes and that was that until I found him on Facebook in August of 2010.

He’s the only person I am in touch with from my lost year at UCLA. I had a girlfriend that year but she’s married now and has a baby. I had Economics professor Russell Roberts for two classes who I admired. He was the first Orthodox Jew I met and he and Dennis Prager started me on my religious journey.

Dr. Roberts went on to publish all the books he was dreaming about in the late ’80s but we’ve had no contact for a decade.

I spent three years at Sierra Community College from 1985-1988, but I have only one Facebook friend from that time and we never talk.

When I feel sick, I get nostalgic and yearn to discover what my friends did with their opportunities life. I think about what might have happened for meif I had not crashed into a wall of chronic illness in February of 1988.

Wednesday afternoon, I talk on the phone with Lieutenant Colonel Arnold Strong.



Jan. 2009. First minutes back in Portland after a year in Afghanistan.

Meeting the future President in Spring of 2008.

Sierra Community College, June 1988, after winning awards for Student of the Year in Communications and Political Science.

On my girlfriend’s bed at Rieber Hall in the Spring of 1989.

At UCLA in August 1989.

Arnold: “I’m the CEO of a small software company called Bright Neighbor.

“The mayor of Portland, Sam Adams, the first openly gay mayor of a major city in the nation, was one of our early supporters. He bought the first license of Bright Neighbor and deployed it for the city of Portland. It’s a social media application that focuses on community development.”

“I should finish a master’s degree in Strategic Communication at University of Oregon in May. I was there Monday watching the big Ducks game.

“You remember me at UCLA? I never once went to a football game. I just don’t give a damn about it. My wife Margaret told me when I was a young lieutenant, ‘Sweetie, you better learn something about football or your soldiers are going to think you are either gay or a communist.’

“My youngest son is a football player, so I’ve learned because of him. This season I’ve watched every one of the Ducks’ games because they’ve gone undefeated.”

Luke: “I interviewed the author Jesse Katz a few months ago. His mother Vera Katz was mayor in Portland for many years.”

Arnold: “I used to be on a radio show (Vera and the Voters) frequently with her. I was out of work at the time. I used to call in once a week.”

“After 9/11, I made a complaint. I called up and said there are all these ratty American flags flying all over the city. Every public park had these old ratty piece-of-crap flags. The whole ‘These colors don’t run’ idea. We should show greater respect.

“I said that on her radio show. She said she had come over as a Jew from Europe and it meant so much to her to see the American flag and the statue of Liberty. Within a week, every flag in every park in the city of Portland was replaced.”

“Our mayor, Sam Adams, was Vera’s chief of staff.”

Related Interviews: Authors Dexter Filkins, Steve Fainaru

Posted in Afghanistan, Iraq, Personal | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on My Former UCLA Classmate Is Now A Lieutenant Colonel In The U.S. Army

Tamara Shayne Kagel: The Craigslist Killer in All of Us

I’ve been working so hard to keep my inner Craigslist Killer suppressed that I’m blown away that Tamara was able to detect it. Sometimes you can’t fool a good woman’s intuition.

Tamara writes for the Jewish Journal:

I think everyone to some degree has a secret life, especially when it comes to sex. Sexuality is incredibly complicated. Every day I seem to hear of a new sexual perversion – usually from a Law and Order SVU episode. But people everywhere seem to be into all kinds of crazy kinky things. The thing is, I’m tempted to say “I don’t know any of these people.” As in, I don’t know anyone that’s met up with someone for sex from Craigslist, nor have my friends complained about some boy wanting to take them to a sex club, nor have I ever thought about strangling someone since I had to take a self-defense class in college. But statistically, these things are occurring at a rate which implies that I do know such people – I just don’t know who they are. And if I know people or even am friends with people who like to meet up with strangers from the internet for sex, maybe the problem isn’t that everyone has secret lives, maybe the problem is we don’t talk about it enough?

The place I get hung up on, is everyone, especially you’re average run of the mill man seems to have some sort of secret sexual fantasy life. We don’t punish people for thoughts so how angry can a woman really get at a man who has fantasized about another woman or even five women. The difference is some people act on it and some don’t. Theoretically though, there must be millions of men and women out there who have a secret sexual fantasy life. A life which they don’t share with anyone, and they never act on. They just think about. But in a relationship where you’re supposed to share everything, maybe it would be better if they didn’t share. If you’re married for forty years, it is completely unreasonable to expect that your mate is never fantasizing about sex with someone else. But at the same time, I really don’t want to know if my boyfriend is fantasizing about a friend of mine. It’s weird and gives me the heebeegeevies.

Posted in Tamara Shayne Kagel | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Tamara Shayne Kagel: The Craigslist Killer in All of Us

Illuminating

On his radio show today, Dennis Prager discussed Sarah Palin’s use today of the term “blood libel” to describe pundits linking her rhetoric to the Tucson shooting.

Dennis: “Is it legitimate? It’s not the exact same thing as happened to the Jews, but there is some truth to it. I would’ve preferred she would’ve just used ‘libel’ or ‘murder libel’ to not get the issue off focus about what the left has done — libel conservative America with murder.”

From DennisPrager.com:

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Radio Show
H1: Illuminating
Prager H1: This has been another illuminating week. James Taranto of the WSJ exposes in clear, stark terms, how the New York Times, its columnists and liberal allies have compromised their commitment to truth to promote their Leftist agenda. This isn’t a smoking gun. It’s the gun itself. Charles Krauthammer agrees.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Radio Show
H2: Fearing Men
Prager H2: Men have been demonized across society, suspected of being potential perverts whenever they are in presence of children. This is bad for children, bad for men, and bad for society.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 Radio Show
H3: Life in North Korea
Prager H3: Dennis talks to BR Myers, director of the international studies department at Dongseo University in South Korea and contributing editor to Atlantic Magazine. His new book is The Cleanest Race: How the North Koreans See Themselves and Why It Matters. A Best of Prager Hour. Originally broadcast on February 16, 2010.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011 Radio Show
H1: It’s Not about Political Rhetoric
Prager H1: Political rhetoric had nothing to do with the murders Arizona. To say that bulls-eyes on political districts inspired a killer is not only foolish, it defies common sense… To be on the Left means never to have to say your sorry. To be on the Left is to be kind and compassionate. To be on the Right is to be mean and selfish.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011 Radio Show
H2: Controlling the Media and Education
Prager H2: If you control both media and education, you have a lot of control over your society. In Europe, the government controls both. In the US, the Left controls the education agenda and most of the media, but not talk radio – big difference… Why does the Left so loathe Sarah Palin?

Tuesday, January 11, 2011 Radio Show
H3: Ultimate Issues: Battle Yourself
Prager H3: In order to be a good person one must battle their emotions. We are fully submerged in the age of stupidity. Dictated by feelings, people battle outside forces rather than the true battle within. “How do I feel about it,” has supplanted “Is it right or wrong?” Callers weigh in. A Best of Prager Hour. Originally broadcast on June 29, 2010.

Fear Males

Males have come to be regarded as dangerous predators, objects to be feared. This is the Politically Correct, hyper-feminized world in which we live. Sad.

Krauthammer: Yes, It’s a Libel

Charles Krauthammer is so disgusted with what the Left has tried to do with the Arizona tragedy that he writes a special column. He reviews the facts and makes his usual airtight case: the Left has libeled the Right. Don’t miss the last line. Devastating.

Taranto: NYT Crosses the Line

This has been another illuminating week. James Taranto of the WSJ exposes in clear, stark terms, how the New York Times, its columnists and its liberal allies have compromised their commitment to truth to promote their Leftist agenda. This isn’t a smoking gun. It’s the gun itself. Essential reading.

Would This Inspire You to Kill?

Here’s the famous Sarah Palin map.

Liberal Columnist Sums Up the Left Position on Arizona Murders

You really have to go no further than Michael Tomasky, columnist for The Guardian newspaper of the UK, to understand the Left’s view of the Right, those hateful SIXHIRB Americans who vote Republican.
Posted in Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Illuminating

One Way To Fight Illegal Immigration

Implementing REAL ID

Less Expensive, Doable, and Helpful in Reducing Fraud

WASHINGTON (January 10, 2011) – By May 2011, all states must be in compliance with the first 18 security benchmarks of the federal secure driver’s license law known as the REAL ID Act. REAL ID was prompted by the fact that the 9/11 hijackers acquired a total of 30 state-issued IDs and driver’s licenses in order to embed themselves here (and board airplanes).

The Center for Immigration Studies has published a review of the current state of REAL ID: ‘REAL ID Implementation: Less Expensive, Doable, and Helpful in Reducing Fraud‘ was prepared by Janice Kephart, a former 9/11 Commission counsel and currently the Center’s National Security Policy Director. The paper is online at www.cis.org. Among the findings:

  • REAL ID has proven easier and less expensive to implement than previously believed. Using actual state budget numbers, total one-time costs to implement REAL ID’s 18 security benchmarks, for all states combined, could be as low as $350 million and not likely to exceed $750 million.
  • These numbers are significantly less than the one-time costs of at least $1 billion that the National Governors Association (NGA), National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), and the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) claimed in 2006.
  • Eleven states are already fully compliant with REAL ID’s 18 security benchmarks, ahead of the May 2011 deadline. Another eight states are close behind.
  • The legal presence of applicants is being checked in all but two states, up 28 states from 2006. Every state is now checking Social Security numbers.
  • Some states were able to achieve full compliance in less than a year, and other state costs came in significantly below the projections which have been used for years to denigrate REAL ID’s feasibility.
  • Compliant states are finding REAL ID to be helpful in reducing fraud by criminals and illegal aliens shopping for the easiest driver’s license issuance rules. Motor vehicle departments using REAL ID standards are also increasing criminal investigations of those who have traditionally used driver’s license systems to commit identity theft and operate illegally under multiple identities.
  • Regulatory proposals from the NGA, NCSL, and AAMVA, slated for an upcoming lobbying campaign, incorporate language from Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano’s failed 2009 PASS ID Act, which sought to repeal much of REAL ID.
  • Secretary Napolitano in November 2010 ordered an internal review with the goal of using the regulatory process to change REAL ID requirements after the failure of PASS ID.

The paper also includes a chart listing for every state the current status of implementation, federal grant monies issued to date, and costs of compliance, where available.

Posted in Immigration | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on One Way To Fight Illegal Immigration

Beatniks, courage, and Rabbs

Greg Leake emails: Hi Luke,

I like the sunglasses. Sure, I know your reasons for wearing them.

But frankly, you know, the shades go some distance towards fulfilling my image of you. In my mind you’re kind of a combination of Jack Kerouac and Holden Caulfield, with maybe a little Yukio Mishima thrown in around the edges. (That would be the sinister part.)

And I think the sunglasses are a natural auxiliary to the the things you discuss and the manner in which you discuss them.

On your YouTube “I Return To Aish HaTorah” you expressed a good measure of concern over the idea that you were cowardly in some way.

Forget about it. You’re not cowardly at all. I did a little boxing and actually taught boxing for a while. One time Sammy ‘the Bull’ Gravano (former underboss of the Gambino crime family) was talking with famous boxing trainer Teddy Atlas. Gravano insisted that he was not afraid of anything. Teddy Atlas (who coached Michael Moore through one of his title victories) explained to him that everybody was afraid, and the only point was what you actually did. Like Dr. Melfi once recommended the title of a book to Tony Soprano, Feel the Fear and Do It Anyway. (Tony really needed that advice, eh?)

Back when Cus D’amato was still alive and before Mike Tyson became an animal, Cus used to tell him a story about two guys in the ring. Both were equally afraid, but one of them acted and the other shrank. It had nothing to do with the internal experience of the fear. They both experienced that. It was simply that one of them acted one way, and the other acted a different way and lost.

I can also tell you the same thing is true when you’re crawling under barbed wire with a rifle, and bullets are flying over your head. The fear is endemic to the situation. The thing that separates one man from another is that the brave one continues to operate despite the fear, being very technically correct in all his ground-crawling methods. I used to be afraid that when my hands started to tremble that it was a sign of cowardice. This is why it’s important to understand some of the physiological characteristics of the body’s fight-or-flight syndrome. Now I understand that this is simply one of the characteristics of adrenaline hitting the system.

You have started up whole businesses by yourself. You have come back from a debilitating condition and started up another business. You walked into Aish HaTorah evern though you were frightened and concerned about being humiliated. You endured the rebukes of angry people. I remember the pictures of you with a gun. And you have certainly not hesitated to report on matters that could have severe blowback.

You have foibles, as we all do, and courage is a ladder that you run out of years climbing without ever reaching the top. But you’re doing fine in the courage department. These challenges are upsetting, but you keep on meeting them, and you keep on managing to prevail.

I hope this is not an invasion of your privacy, but I at least know enough about this subject that you can completely dismiss the idea of cowardice from your self-evaluations.

Rabbs, if you happen to read this, I confess your last post to me left me baffled. You know that I think you are a very smart guy, and I think you are pretty courageous in the honest way you face your demons. However, I do not get upset because you don’t believe in the divinity of Jesus. So I fail to understand why you would be upset when I reject the notion that the Torah is the single and only revelation of G-d that has ever occurred in history.

The point of view that I briefly referred to in my last post is sometimes called Essentialism, and it was old before the Concord Transcendentalists.

I studied philosophy in college, got interested in the philosophy of religion. It borrows from philosophy, from comparative religions, from the history of religions, and from theology. And a lot of my thinking about religions originates in my background in philosophy.

After we conclude that there is only one G-d, we are only left with 3 choices.
1. my group is the only group to have a relationship with the one G-d.
2. every group throughout history has had a relationship with the one G-d.
3. sometimes throughout history some groups have had a relationship with the one G-d some of the time.

I am in the third group which means that I regard Judaism and Christianity to be two of the groups that have had relationships with the one G-d. I don’t know whether this really speaks to whatever it is that got you steamed. I’m sure you’re aware that there is a wide variety of Christian denominations with different ideas. However they basically agree that you are probably a Christian if you see Jesus in a divine context. That does not necessarily mean that you refuse to believe that other religions may have some light to shed on the nature of G-d and G-d’s relationship to man.

Furthermore, the fact that people sometimes decide that their religion is not speaking to them, and they wish to move to a different religion is what Luke has done to embrace Judaism. And I’m uncertain why you would feel that people who decide to convert have less validity than someone who stays in whatever religion their parents saddled them with. Luke’s father is an important Christian minister, and yet he helped Luke move into Judaism. I hope this little explanation diminishes whatever set of propositions upset you. I am actually older than you are, and I’ve been studying these matters for many decades. And in philosophy we simply discuss things. If a person is not willing to discuss, then we simply have no vehicle for communication.

RABBI RABBS EMAILS: Hey Greg,

Good to hear from you again, and thank you for your continued interest in our show. I shall respond to your latest input by breaking what you wrote down into three parts:

1. You wrote the following straw man: “So I fail to understand why you would be upset when I reject the notion that the Torah is the single and only revelation of G-d that has ever occurred in history.”

I never got upset at you, and I never presented the notion that Torah is the only revelation of G-d. Perhaps YOU rejected the notion that Torah is the only revelation of G-d, but I had never claimed that it was.

Please go back and re-read carefully what I actually did write.

2. You wrote the following silliness: “After we conclude that there is only one G-d, we are only left with 3 choices” and those choices all had to do with relationships with G-d.

That’s ridiculous. “Relationships with G-d” are irrelevant in the discussion. What is important is which stream has absolute truth and can prove their truth beyond a shadow of a doubt. This is a fact-finding mission, not a feel-good exercise.

3. You misguidedly wrote: “I’m uncertain why you would feel that people who decide to convert have less validity than someone who stays in whatever religion their parents saddled them with.”

Where did you come up with such nonsense? I have openly stated many times on the show that converts are more beloved by G-d than are us born to the tribe.

Posted in Personal, R. Rabbs | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Beatniks, courage, and Rabbs

Etan G – The Jewish Rapper

Get the skinny on Etan G. here! Find out about the man, the legend, and how it all came to be! Get the information and everything else you would want to know right here!

Press/Media

Read up on the latest Etan G. press coverage!

San Diego Jewish Journal

  • The Rabbi’s In Da House (6.36 mb)
  • Mixed Multitudes

  • Etan G: The Interview (747 kb)
  • Baltimore Jewish Times

  • G Wiz! (747 kb)
  • Baltimore Jewish Times Questions/Answers
  • The Journal News

  • Synagogue member honored with new Torah at Mount Kisco Hebrew Congregation (232 kb)
  • Suburbarazzi

  • Word to your mazel tov! Paul Shaffer helms rap inspired by synagogue congregant’s poem (312 kb)
  • HITS Magazine

  • Ten Things We Liked (144 kb)
  • Jewsweek

  • Jewsweek Sizzlin’ 60 (312 kb)
  • Hadassah

  • Hadassah Magazine Cover (16 MB)
  • Andwerve Magazine

  • Andwerve Magazine (488 kb)
  • B’nai Brith

  • B’nai Brith (4.5 MB)
  • Judaism’s Encounter with American Sports

  • Book excerpt (1.8 MB)
  • The Forward

  • Magazine Article (72 kb)
  • The Jewish Journal

  • Rockin’ for Israel (172 kb)
  • Something Jewish

  • Etan G Interview (156 kb)
  • Other Press/Media Coverage

  • Article from O.C.J.P.
  • Article from Birthright Israel
  • Posted in Music | Comments Off on Etan G – The Jewish Rapper