Friend: “I’m not getting stuff done right, I’m a little distracted.”
Luke: “That’s understandable considering you are staring death in the face.”
Friend: “That’s not as bad as staring you in the face.”
Luke: “We’ll always remember you firing off faxes and emails of complaint until your last breath, trying to haggle with death, being the quintessential Jew to your last moment.”
* Wisdom from the rebbetzin: “I am sure that once married, you’d treat your wife 4-5 points better than the average Muslim. But the Muslims have a brain to know when to exercise his right to remain silent. Or to use his privacy settings.”
* Why don’t Jews call the Chinese and Japanese goyim? Why are only white goyim called goyim? I’m talking about social reality, not theory. A friend: “Goyim refers to the dominant culture, so faces of minorities are less likely to pop up if you say that word.”
Posted inPersonal|Comments Off on Staring Death In The Face
On election night, 1986, I was at election headquarters in Auburn, California covering the news for KAHI/KHYL radio. One candidate for office who was defeated was drunk, and that shocked me. When I interviewed her, she sang that “Que Sera Sera” French song. I had little experience with alcohol, growing up a Seventh-Day Adventist.
There was this old guy, in his 70s, who started talking about voting patterns among various ethnic groups and I was shocked. Dumbstruck. Finally I sputtered, “You wouldn’t happen to be a racist?” He exploded. He said that noticing the different ways different groups of people voted was not remotely racist. I just stood there listening. I was out of my depth. I had never thought about that before. I had years of education that you are not allowed to notice differences among different ethnic groups, that it was a horrible thing to notice such patterns. It was racist and that was the greatest social sin. I had been schooled to be dumb. I knew empirically that there appeared to be significant differences between the races, I saw that every day on the playing field and the classroom, but I thought my noticing of these patterns was racist and must be kept to myself.
It’s sad that it is verboten to notice and discuss reality. Appreciating the differences between cultures and races would be a true celebrating of human diversity. Different peoples are given different gifts in God’s world and all have a valuable role to play.
As a great sage said: “I think that one of the biggest, if not the biggest faux pas, you can make in educated society today is to say or write anything that can be construed as racist.”
When I discuss ethnic patterns in public, I usually get reactions like these: “Very Hitler of you.”
“What you are doing is disgusting. You’re becoming a bitter old man that has nothing relevant to say, so you post racist rantings.”
I love football and basketball. When I watch sports, I notice huge race differences. I can’t think, for instance, of a starting white cornerback or tailback in the NFL.
I’m working on a song.
I’m not a racist
I just want to be free
To notice patterns
And reality!
Posted inRace|Comments Off on Don’t Notice Patterns!
According to Gene Expression: Men average 4 to 5 IQ points higher than women.
“The generally listed “peak” age for scientific creativity and productivity is around the surprisingly young age range of 30-40, but the same exact age doesn’t apply to all scientific disciplines. The peak in fields that demand greater doses of pure reasoning, such as mathematics, theoretical physics, and molecular biology, appears to be somewhere in the twenties. So, for instance, James Watson discovered the double helix at 25 and then dropped off the radar as anything but a nerd celebrity. In contrast are fields such as evolutionary biology, where years of collecting and assimilating large amounts of data can be required for original analysis.”
Posted inIQ|Comments Off on Men’s IQ Tends To Be 4-5 Points Higher Than Women’s
Economist Stanley Fischer holds dual citizenship in Israel and the United States. Between 2005-2013, he was the governor of the Bank of Israel.
Barack Obama has nominated him to be vice-hair of the Federal Reserve of the United States. Is it a good idea to appoint a dual-citizen to such a high position in American government? Is it good for the Jews that someone who ran the Bank of Israel and took decisions not necessarily good for the United States to take this lofty position? Will it make the goyim more suspicious of us? Will it raise anew the charges of dual loyalty against those American Jews who are deeply involved in Israel?
Steve Sailer, a non-Jewish paleo-Conservative thinker, writes: “To get some sense of how revolutionary is President Obama’s nomination of Stanley Fischer, the head central banker for the Israeli government from 2005 to 2013, to the number two role at America’s central bank, I’ve been trying to look up American government officials who were previously high government officials for other governments. I haven’t yet been able to find a Wikipedia category for such a thing.”
“The single most fundamental question of political life is: Whose side are you on? There is a lot of talent available to the United States government, so why it should be necessary to appoint to high position a man who carefully chose to make that question unanswerable?”
Sailer adds: “Although Fischer’s many well-heeled supporters portray his jobs in Israel and now America as utterly technical, they are inherently political.”
“Third, the nomination of Fischer is to establish that it’s A-OK for a dual-citizen high Israel-government official to move over to a similar job in the U.S. government. Sure, a few years from now it may still seem a little unusual for, say, the head of Israeli military intelligence to move on to running the National Security Administration in Fort Meade, but don’t you remember the Fischer Precedent?”
What was Stanley Fischer’s role in the rape of Russia during the 1990s privatization that went to a few oligarchs who made billions?
It’s a maxim of Jewish law that you should not appoint a stranger (a goy) or a woman to a position of power. It would be unthinkable for Jews to appoint a non-Jew to a powerful position over them. The American goyim apparently have no such compunction.
As Sailer notes, white guilt means being too ethnocentric while Jewish guilt means being insufficiently ethnocentric.
Posted inJews|Comments Off on Is Stanley Fischer good for the Jews, or does his appointment needlessly make the goyim suspect us?
There are plenty of Orthodox Jews who are black and fit in with their communities. They lead lives observant of Torah. Their skin color is not a big issue to most of their co-religionists. All the obligations that a Jew has for his fellow Jew he owes to his fellow black Jew while the whitest goy is still a goy.
And then there’s this particular blinged-up black guy I know who walks into shul on a Shabbos. It’s 11:45 a.m., services are almost over. He wraps his head in a tallis (prayer shawl), closes his eyes, pretends to pray, does five bows and then takes a couple of steps back (you are supposed to take three steps back and then three steps forward before starting the prayer and then there are two bows at the first part of the prayer), and I’ve known the guy for years and I like him, but he does every Jewish ritual wrong and he shows no interest in doing things right and he pays no attention to all attempts to correct him. After years of this, he’s not picking up on social cues. He’s just unbelievably obtuse. He’s completely oblivious to Orthodox customs. He won’t listen to anyone who attempts to help him fit in. He wears a tallis on Friday night (you are only supposed to wear them in the morning). He takes home prayer shawls and books from the shul and I’ve never seen him return them. On Shabbos morning when he walks in and pretends to pray like everyone else, he does everything wrong.
He will talk for minutes on end about what the Bible says but Judaism is not a biblical religion and we don’t operate according to the Bible. I’ve seen lots of people, Jews and non-Jews, walk into shul and not have a clue about what to do, but I’ve never seen anyone come to the shul for years and not pick up a clue. And so how is this guy treated? He’s embraced. People enjoy him. He helps out. But we don’t think he’s Jewish.
This guy believes he’s Jewish but we have no reason to believe he is. We don’t think his mother is Jewish. And almost every Orthodox shul I know in Los Angeles will welcome this guy and so what if he doesn’t want to learn anything about doing things right, doing things the Jewish way, he won’t be called to the Torah, but he’s part of the crowd and we all hug him and enjoy him. I wonder what percentage of Orthodox shuls would boot him? Or a guy who came in with a shiksa girlfriend?
I think this guy exemplifies the relationship between Jews and non-Jewish blacks. On the level of reality, Jews and blacks are as dissimilar as two groups can be in America. Yet next to Israel, support for the black cause is probably the second most deeply felt belief among Jews, far exceeding their faith in God. Generally speaking, American Jews have warm feelings for blacks, much more so than the average white (certainly of the whites I knew prior to converting to Judaism) and yet in person walking down the street at night, Jews I’ve known display much more visceral fear of blacks and desire to get away from them than the whites I knew growing up (most of these whites would’ve felt guilty displaying fear of blacks but most of the Jews I know would not feel this guilt).
Jews were major players in the civil rights campaign of the 1960s. Jews loved voting for Barack Obama twice for president. Jew lawyers love defending blacks accused of heinous crimes and castigating whites for racism.
On page 979 of the book What It Takes, it’s explicitly about the 1988 presidential campaign but many of the themes are generically true of American life: “New York was the ugliest primary, a roiling suspend of particulate fears and hatreds… Blacks and Jews hated each other (and Jews felt bad about that), the blacks hated Mayor Koch (who thought he spoke for Jews), the Latins resented Koreans, Koreans feared the blacks…”
Political science professor Robert Weissberg has translated Ebonics at various trials. As a convert to Judaism, I’d say that in the video above he captures accurately many Jewish attitudes towards blacks that I have witnessed.
During the 1920s and 1930s, Jews funded education for 20-40% of black children in the South. Jews established and funded the NAACP.
“A Rosenwald School was the name informally applied to over five thousand schools, shops, and teachers’ homes in the United States which were built primarily for the education of African-Americans in the early 20th century. The need arose from the chronic underfunding of public education for African-American children in the South, who were required to attend segregated schools. Julius Rosenwald, an American clothier who became part-owner and president of Sears, Roebuck and Company, was the founder of The Rosenwald Fund, through which he contributed seed money for many of the schools and other philanthropic causes. To promote collaboration between white and black citizens, Rosenwald required communities to commit public funds to the schools, as well as to contribute additional cash donations. Millions of dollars were raised by African-American rural communities across the South to fund better education for their children.”
Dr. Weissberg says in the video above:
“I went to Booker T. Washington Junior High School. I speak fluent…ebonics. I am board-certified fluent in it. Like Jared Taylor, I have translated at various trials.”
“How do you gets Jews away from the left on our [conservative] side?”
“Jews have a lot of brain power. They’re very energetic. They have a lot of money. And if they were on our side, not their side, it would make a huge difference for us.”
“What explains the historical infatuation between blacks and Jews? I call it a co-dependency relationship.”
“We all know the tremendous support Jews have given the black cause.”
“Black anti-semitism is worse than you think… What’s interesting and depressing is how popular this is among black leaders… If you are a black leader and you are going to appeal to the bro’s in the hood, there is nothing that outshines rabid anti-semitism for proving one’s commitment to the brothers.”
* “There are Jewish social service providers who like the idea of blacks as permanent justifications for their jobs.”
* “Jews have believed in a strong central state because only a strong central state could protect them. However, objective conditions have changed. Jews and blacks occupy antithetical positions in politics. It has become zero sum. There is no longer any justification for Jews supporting the black cause. Clearly affirmative action has become harmful for Jews. Much more so Asians… The black assault on Jewish life.
“If you looked around our cultural landscape and tried to find two groups with different values that venerate different things, who worship at different altars, it is hard to find two groups more different than blacks and Jews. Jews are obsessed with education, blacks destroy it. If you’ve gone to school in the inner city, you know that not only do they hate the idea of learning, but they assault their teachers and physically destroy their schools.”
* “When blacks move into a neighborhood, the first people out are Jews. Jews did not invent white flight but we perfected it. As far as intermarriage and social exchange, there’s almost zero. They just don’t mix. Jews are not into crime. The sorts of things that blacks specialize in — muggings, assaults, rapes — are not a Jewish predilection.”
* “How Jews really relate to blacks is something Jews hardly talk about except when they are amongst themselves. When Jews get together in a safe place and talk about blacks, they will use the term ‘schvartze.’ When you go to Leo Rosten’s Joys of Yiddish, he’s very careful in what he says. With ‘schvartze’, he becomes tight-lipped. A black person, a negro. That does not begin to depict what the term means among Jews. There may be a degree of affection, as in, ‘I hear Mrs. Schwartz got a new schvartze.’
“It is not necessarily a negative word. It’s not the same thing as nigger. If you inserted the word ‘nigger’ to receive some lexiconic variety, Jews would be genuinely offended. There can even be a degree of affection in schvartze. As in, ‘Ahh, I heard Mrs. Schwartz got a new schvartze. Oh, how nice.'”
“When you use the term ‘schvartze’, it always implies cognitive inferiority. The mental picture of a stupid black embedded in the term schvartze is true even with pro-civil rights [liberal] Jews… Adding the phrase ‘dumb schvartze’ is superflous, reserved only used for the most egregious stupidity. Invisible baggage likewise includes gullibility, emotional excitability, and a weakness for here-and-now conspicuous consumption. Violence, especially inter-personal, alcohol-induced mayhem, is also associated with schvartze. The image that comes to the mind with Jews when you say ‘schvartze’ is a simple-minded, impulsive, easily seduced by trinkets [creature]. This is extremely close to the traditional Southern image of blacks, almost identical to what many Southerners would privately say about blacks… This is continually reinforced by daily experience, such as in integrated public schools.
“We had a procession of cleaning ladies [in New York]. Growing up, I honestly believed that all black people come from a thing called The Agency. We’d hire black cleaning ladies and invariably they’d steal and drink the liquor and my mother would come back and say, ‘I’m calling up The Agency and getting another.’ Very few Jews of my generation had any other contact. We had a procession of handymen and cleaning people come to my house.”
“Even Jews who are pro-black carry around with them that more basic underlying view.”
“It was always believed that any Jew can ultimately out-smart any schvartze except save being confronted by a demented gunman. Despite immense cultural chasms, Jews held themselves as innately capable of finessing blacks thanks to their superior wits, verbal talent, and a mastery of black psychology. The unmatched success of Jewish ghetto merchants and Jewish civil rights leadership positions proclaim this truth. Even today Jews may secretly brag about their success in beguiling blacks in contentious interpersonal relationships. People sometimes ask me, ‘What did you do when they showed up as a demonstration to your office?’ This happened to me one time. A bunch of angry young blacks came to my office… I said, ‘I just relied on the wisdom of my ancestors. I gave them a little rope-a-dope. I moved around. I said this, I said that. Within half an hour, they were fine. I sold one a suit and several new jewelry and they were happy. They got a deal from Mr. Weissberg.'”
“Where personal manipulation might fail, the storehouse of survival tactics sufficed exceedingly well. Black pathologies were bearable, especially since most black mayhem was self-inflicted. Jews might even profit from these disorders as merchants or nanny state therapists. Threatened Jews can flee deteriorating neighborhoods, enroll their children in private schools, hire security guards, co-opt black leaders financially, or otherwise escape.”
“Jews see no conflict between righteously defending black criminals as political prisoners and living in fortress-style buildings.”
“On the one hand, Jews dread blacks physically. When Jews see blacks walking down the street, they feel tremendous fear. Yet they dutifully pay the danegeld (extortion money).”
“For most Jews, it is the white goyim who pose the most threat. Contrary fact-based argument fall on deaf ears. Like the schvartzes, the Chinese [and Japanese] are never called goyim.”
“Blacks are incapable of such well-organized horror unless directed by nefarious whites… A full-scale pogrom is beyond their capacity. Can you imagine blacks systemically rounding up thousands of Jews or even keeping tabs on Jewish neighborhoods? Assess enemies by capabilities, not intentions… The schvartze pose minimal risk. They’re too stupid.”
Posted inBlacks, Jews, Race|Comments Off on So This Black Guy Walks Into A Shul…
On his radio show Jan. 7, 2014, Dennis said: “There has been an assault on the big family. Five or more children is a big family.”
“I want to make a case solely on what I have observed for having a lot of kids. What I have found defies the conventional wisdom among the intelligentsia… I have an observation that is counter-intuitive.”
“This has been true in every case I have witnessed.”
“The kids are generally healthier. Each of them has been lively, spirited, filled with love of life, and individual. Only children have rarely had this extroverted spirit that I have found in kids who come from a lot of siblings.”
“You would think, ten kids, cookie cutters, but each is individual. Different from one another. Characters. The older ones tend to raise the younger ones.”
“After a certain number of kids, it gets easier because the older kids take care of the younger kids, which is unbelievably maturing for those kids. The helicopter parent can’t exist with eight kids. You can’t be at eight different sporting events at the same time so they don’t show up and that’s better for the children. The fewer the children, the more hovering you can do.”
“This [argument] well, they [the kids] don’t get the individual attention, I say that’s great. That’s an advantage.”
“I wish circumstances had enabled me to have a lot of children.”
“In general, these kids [from large families] are happier, healthier, more individual, more self-reliant, and everything else good that I can say.”
Therapist Mark E. Smith talked about common family dysfunctions: “Every homosexual man I’ve known was abandoned by his father. You will not meet a homosexual man who was emotionally close with his father growing up. Every one I’ve known was enmeshed with a woman, be it grandma or mom or a whole house full of women, but they overly connect with them, and then during adolescence, because of these wounds and everyone is twisted up in everyone’s sexuality, the root cause is their childhood emotional wounds, and the little boys hunger for male love and they over-identify with the feminine. They did not choose to be gay but it is all because momma devoted too much to be super-mom.”
“A third dysfunction is having too large of a family… Two people can’t raise eleven people. That’s insane. It’s worse than alcoholism because the older ones don’t get a childhood, they have to raise the younger ones and the middle ones get lost, and then by the time the younger ones come along, the parents are exhausted. Nobody gets what they need. If I hear of a family with more than five kids, I know they’re insane. I know it is family full of broken empty people. It is wickedly dysfunctional.”
On Jan. 9, 2014, Camille Paglia said on Dennis Prager’s radio show: “Sexuality is fluid. Orientation can change according to circumstance. It’s a canard that you are born gay. There’s not a shred of evidence. You are born with certain traits that in a certain period in a certain society may make you trend towards a homosexual choice. Homosexuality is an adaptation, not an in-born trait.”
“If I had born in Italy 200 years ago in the countryside, I would’ve married and had children or I would’ve been a nun.”
“I was born with an aggressive energy and I did not fit in with 1950s girl culture.”
“Every single gay person I know has some sort of drama going on. Back in childhood something was happening that we are not allowed to ask about anymore… The biggest pattern is in gay men. Every gay man I know has a pattern where he was closer to his mother than to his father and there was some distance between the mother and father so that she looked to her son as the companion to her soul. They drafted the son into their own drama. You are not allowed to ask questions any more about the childhood of gay persons. It’s homophobic.”
I learned about Meir Kahane early into my exploration of Judaism when the rabbi was assassinated in 1990. I was shocked that a rabbi who wanted to push non-Jews out of Israel would have so much support in Jewish life.
Then as I learned more Torah, I learned that everything Rabbi Kahane pushed in this respect was backed up by Torah law. Hmm, I thought, maybe Judaism does not reconcile so neatly with modern norms of democracy and human rights.
I grew up a Seventh-Day Adventist and I didn’t learn to think tribally. I learned to think theologically. The big question was — are you saved? I never heard an Adventist express the view that it was fine to cheat and steal from non-Adventists.
I did not go to public school until tenth grade and then I was exposed to tribal thinking. When my school, overwhelmingly white, would play sports at a black school, often the black kids would come over and try to pick fights with us solely because we were white. That reminded me of other incidents I had in Washington D.C. in 1980 with black kids outside of the church who would try to pick fights with me because I was white.
When I got to UCLA in 1988, I noticed more tribalism. Black and latino students, who almost always had dramatically lower test scores but got into the university through affirmative action, largely kept to themselves and took easy majors. The Asian students also largely kept to themselves. White students made up a minority of the population. I noticed the Orthodox Jewish students largely kept to themselves.
I saw all these tribes around me. I saw groups of people united by ethnicity not afraid to assert their group interests. This was completely contrary to the way I was raised. I can’t think of anybody I grew up with who talked about whites asserting their group interest.
In 1993, I converted to Judaism through a Reform rabbi and joined the tribe. As the years went by, I increasingly identified more with the Orthodox version of the religion than with any other wing (eventually completing my Orthodox conversion in 2009). I became more comfortable with tribal thinking.
In 2000, I encountered the weekly column of white nationalist William Pierce, who wanted an America free of blacks, latinos and Jews. I recognized in Dr. Pierce the mirror image of Meir Kahane and the exclusive Jewish nationalism of nearly half the Orthodox Jews I knew.
I started thinking, if it is cool for blacks, latinos, Jews and homosexuals to organize for their group interests, why is it wrong for whites to do so? If whites want to create a white nation, why is that any worse than Jews who want an exclusively Jewish Israel? White nationalism no longer seemed any more scary or distressing to me than black nationalism or Jewish nationalism. I don’t identify with white nationalism, but I am no longer appalled by those who do so long as they use peaceful means. Yet, Meir Kahane was not interested in restricting himself to peaceful means to make Israel exclusively Jewish so I had to see Dr. Pierce’s schemes in the same light.
In a 2006 lecture, Tom Wolfe said: “Each individual adopts a set of values which, if truly absolute in the world – so ordained by some almighty force – would make not that individual but his group…the best of all possible groups, the best of all inner circles.”
That’s a great insight. A Steve Sailer reader emailed him:
Maybe each particular group must feel that they have a theoretical chance to dominate or else there will be a psychological schism too large to bridge without overt domination of one group over another.
A diverse society therefore has two options: living a lie that every group is equal in ability (eventually backed by force as it fails) or a caste system backed by force.
This would seem to argue against neoconservative color blind society that ignores group differences.
A Sailer reader emailed: “If a critical mass of blacks decides to abide by the White egocosmos, it will damage the credibility of its black counterpart, and thus compell (eventually) blacks to accept being in second place in the dominant paradigm. Thus where going by the book might be the better individual strategy, the preservation of group vanity requires the instillment of an alternative paradigm reflecting the endowments of African-Americans, where they come in first and whites in second.”
Posted inJews, Personal, Race|Comments Off on Meir Kahane & William Pierce
It is a list of prominent (mostly) leftist/progressive intimidation incidents, or profiles in preemptive cowardice in anticipation thereof, or firings because of ludicrous and exaggerated PC claims of ‘offensiveness’ (usually concerning mere jokes) that I wish had been deterred or handled differently. Also taboo-witch-hunts (is there a good word for a person who is a ‘taboo-truth-witch’ that is better than ‘heretic’, ‘apostate’, or ‘blasphemer’?)
Posted inPolitics|Comments Off on 91 Persecutions Over Political Correctness
As he broadcasts overlooking the kotel, he wraps himself in the authority of Orthodox Judaism, but his private life is anything but modest.
He specializes in counseling and seducing suicidal married women. When the affair comes to an end and they’ve recaptured their will to live, they return to their husbands and won’t say anything.
Women hear him online and at live lectures and they flock to him with their problems. And using his secular education and the wisdom of the Jewish tradition, he counsels them.
Married multiple times, he sometimes passes out in front of his computer from xanax.
He drugs his women with xanax and ambien and hypnotizes them with his NLP skills. He tells them he will love them forever and will always be there for them. He knows how to take someone’s anxiety in to his hands. And then he convinces them to learn to scuba dive and to go on trips with him but the relationship always has to be secret. He’s a public figure and he can’t be caught in a scandal and he doesn’t want you to get hurt either.
Posted inAbuse|Comments Off on The Bipolar Orthodox Rabbi At The Center Of The World
None of the churches I grew up in offered screenwriting classes. I went to an Orthodox shul tonight to take a class from a bloke with real credits. A husband and wife performed one of his scenes. The rabbi walked in.
Man: “Rabbi, I didn’t say the four-letter word.”
Rabbi: “Tora?”
That’s what I love about Judaism, you can find everything good and exciting in it. If you get sick of God and religion, you can still go to shul to socialize or to take in lectures or to enjoy food or art or music or military or literature and still not leave the Jewish realm. Everything good is contained within. You can watch Woody Allen movies or listen to Leonard Bernstein or watch videos of Israeli war victories or study Hebrew or Arabic or Yiddish or German and it all touches on Judaism. Whatever your kick, you can read books about its connection to the Jews, be it sex or comedy or sports or television or politics or feminism or socialism or capitalism. I never get bored with my Jewish kicks, and Orthodox Judaism, to me, is the most fascinating thing of all.
"This guy knows all the gossip, the ins and outs, the lashon hara of the Orthodox world. He’s an [expert] in... all the inner workings of the Orthodox world." (Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff)