Steve Sailer: Obama Is a Genetic Determinist When It Comes to Sports Talent

From Steve Sailer:

On GoTrackTownUSA, 3 time All-American female distance runner Alexi Pappas writes:

ALEXI PAPPAS: WHAT THE PRESIDENT SAID

By Alexi Pappas / TrackTown USA

EUGENE, Ore. – My family stood together in the small waiting room just outside the Oval Office, nervously smiling like a group of kids waiting their turn at the top of a waterslide. My brother Louis stood at the front of our pack, ready to walk in first – he had spent the past few years working on President Obama’s staff, and this was his last day on the job. The Oval Office door cracked open and laughter spilled out into the waiting room. The family ahead of us walked out, and there he was: the President of the United States, standing just a few feet away.

We shook his hand one by one. Louis introduced me as a professional runner from Eugene, Oregon. The President’s attention then focused directly on me. First, he told me about his visit to Hayward Field during his 2008 campaign. A wonderful place, we agreed. At that moment, Mr. Obama looked me directly in the eye. “You have a gift,” he said. “You were born with a body that was meant to run long distances, more than the average human.”

I was taken aback. Right away I knew what I wanted to say in response … but dare I risk embarrassing my brother and disagree with Mr. Obama? I started by thanking the President, and then I couldn’t help myself – I added that my performance in the sport is actually a result of hard work, motivation and support from my community.

This was not the answer the President wanted to hear.

“No, no,” he said, “Your body is able to flush out lactic acid better than the average person – running is what you were born to do.” Mr. Obama’s energy and tone were so confident and convincing that he could have told me the moon is really made out of cheese and I would have agreed with him. I nodded and thanked him. Besides, our five-minute meeting time was up. I left the Oval Office feeling very honored, but I also couldn’t stop thinking about what the President had said.

The idea that I was meant to run, that I was born with a special ability, felt like it subtracted from my own willpower and motivation to pursue something to the fullest and at the highest level.

A couple of Christmas-shopping seasons ago, the President was seen buying Sports Illustrated reporter David Epstein’s explicitly HBD book The Sports Gene. The Los Angeles Times reported:

But most of Obama’s choices lean more toward pure escapism.

“The Sports Gene: Inside the Science of Extraordinary Athletic Performance,” by Sports illustrated writer David Epstein, tries to dispel common myths about what makes athletes great.

Personally, I think that studying sports for patterns that are revealing about humanity in general, such as the roles played by nature and nurture, isn’t pure escapism.

COMMENTS TO STEVE SAILER:

* It’s funny how much more clearly people think about sports than about everything else. Like if someone said that the New England Patriots suffered from a lack of diversity people would laugh at them. But no matter how many accomplishments Silicon Valley has, they still would obviously be better with more blacks and women.

* A couple of years ago the New England Patriots actually conducted a drive with not a single black player on offense. I stuck out like a sore thumb. I wondered when was the last time that happened? Sometime in the sixties, I suspect.

* So has Obama ever suggested that his intelligence derives from his extremely high achieving black father and from his white mother’s highly intellectual family? And has he noted that it is likely significant that his brother is a physicist?

* Sailer: One of Obama’s rare op-eds was in 1994 about The Bell Curve.

My impression is that Obama’s life was turned around by acing the LSAT, which allowed him to apply to the law schools at just Harvard, Yale, and Stanford, with no safety schools. A fellow worked out the math a few years ago and figured that Obama scored at the 94th to 98th percentile on the LSAT, which sounds plausible.

His maternal grandfather’s brother Ralph Waldo Emerson Dunham was a Berkeley Ph.D. who worked for the federal government. My extremely vague impression is that he might have worked on testing and hiring for the feds, but I might be mistaken on that: I found some old academic papers citing work on selecting good employees by “Dunham” but that may have turned out to be a different Dunham.

Obama’s maternal grandmother’s sister was a professor of something like nutrition science, where I think she specialized in quantitative methods in research.

(His maternal grandparents were the less educated black sheep of their respective families.)

* Imagine George W saying to a young black male…..”Son, you were born to play basketball”, which would have been twisted into…”you were bred to play sports.”

* The 95th percentile would put his LSAT score somewhere around 167 and his IQ at around 130, which is plausible.

Obama doesn’t strike me as a quant, though, and he doesn’t seem to be particularly analytical. He seems to have more of a verbal intelligence to me.

* Obama has good verbal intelligence. His big feat is he can repeat what people tell him back to them more cogently than they said it in the first place, which is not easy. I imagine it’s one reason his family thought he’d do well in the diplomatic corps, where it’s very important to be able to accurately grasp and then summarize the messages that Washington and foreign capitals want to communicate with each other.

* Even more impressive, Obama’s mother was admitted to U. of Chicago at age 15. She didn’t accept, but would have been in the company of a lot of distinguished people: Jim Watson, Susan Sontag, Robert Silvers, George Steiner, Paul Samuelson.

* Obama is no genius. His two auto bio books are lame. His academic accomplishments are zero.

Obama is the not the great statesman. But he is a good teleprompter reader. His diplomatic initiatives are crap. His military initiatives are crap.

Obama was saved by the mafia who blackmailed John Roberts and served up two hollow men as campaign opponents, McCain and Romney.

* His fans make the mistake of describing him as some world-historical genius. He isn’t. But he’s not quite a dolt, either. He’s moderately intelligent, and has a number of personality flaws and ideological blind spots that work against his success. He’s low energy, and he doesn’t seem to be able to stay “on” for long stretches of time.

I think Steve has said in the past that Obama would have been a good Dean of Diversity at a moderately sized university. That’s about right, as long as the university campus was safe and Obama didn’t have to deal with misbehaving ghetto yutes. Basically, you don’t want the guy in any position where he’s responsible for outcomes that matter. President of the United States is not a good match for his strengths and weaknesses.

* As persons of non-color, it’s certainly very easy to look at stuff like this and get angry. And there is nothing inherently bad about getting upset with ethnocentric blacks and their white libtoid enablers. The problem comes when we expect a large majority of blacks to adopt our cultural and moral norms, and/or expect masochistic or [like in Rodham’s case] evil leftoids to stop enabling blacks’ worst behavior.

Instead of setting unrealistic expectations, we must learn to emulate the rank tribalism of blacks, at least until we can wrest political power back from them. As much as the compassionate side of me would like to believe that whites and blacks can live peacefully and prosperously together without white supremacy, I see very little evidence that this is the case. The last four years or so have demonstrated beyond any remotely reasonable doubt that the average black and the average white inhabit vastly different moral universes and will for the foreseeable future. We’re about Justice, they’re about Just Us.

* Just wanted to say a big thank you to ESPN for playing that “Same Love” commercial at every station break. If they hadn’t done that, why, I could easily have gone five, ten, or even twenty minutes without thinking what a wonderful thing homosexuality is… and that would be horrible.

Posted in Genetics, Sports | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Obama Is a Genetic Determinist When It Comes to Sports Talent

The White Guy Award

REPORT: So, let’s take a look at the past winners. Have they all fallen in line with Love’s “white guy” claim?

2013: Kevin Love (check)
2012: Kevin Love (check)
2011: Kevin Love (check)
2010: Luis Scola (check)
2009: Mehmet Okur (check)
2008: Bruce Bowen
2007: Steve Nash (check)
2006: Steve Nash (check)
2005: Brad Miller (check)
2004: Brian Cardinal (check)

Posted in Basketball, Whites | Comments Off on The White Guy Award

What’s the loneliest place in the world? The Puerto Rican Cultural Center.

* Jewish Friend: When my kids were little, I used to say “what’s the best day to go to the Bronx Zoo?”
Answer: During the Puerto Rican Day Parade.

* Jewish Friend: “You’re very racist today.”
Luke: “I wasn’t like this prior to converting to Orthodox Judaism. I’m the victim here.”
Friend: “Wow.”

* Three Jews have a friendly chat.
Democrat Jew: “Republicans couldn’t handle the CNBC moderators. A bunch of crybabies.”
Independent Jew: “Jews couldn’t handle Hitler. Bunch of crybabies.”
Republican Jew to Democrat Jew: “Go teach a class in how to stab a Jew.”

* My friend has a computer problem.
Luke: “Do we have any chinks around here?”
Friend: “Yeah, you.”

* I grew up in the Australian outback, birds singing, very quiet, no Jews around for a hundred miles.

* A Jew: “That Adventist ministry? Do people get anything out of it?”
Luke: “Yes, assurance of their heavenly salvation.”

* For a very reasonable price, I’m willing to come to your home and talk to your kids about the facts of life.

* This could have been me, but thank god Desmond was a strict father.

* My new book is called “How To Make Love Like A Seventh-Day Adventist Preacher!”

* I told an Orthodox Jew that my new book is called “How to **** Like a Seventh-Day Adventist!” He said: “Probably too G-rated for me.”

* A Jew just yelled at me: “The Vatican’s laundering money!”
Phew.

* Some vendors, when they see a Jew coming, it seems like they double their prices. What did your tradition teach you to do when you see a Jew coming?

* Friend: “My life is so boring compared to yours.”
Luke: “I just didn’t know how to leverage that work experience.”
Friend: “How about over a desk?”

* My friend says a couple of these chairs could take my love life to the next level.

* I find it hard to join a group without immediately scheming how to take it over.

* I walk around yearning for the world to acclaim me for traits and accomplishments I don’t have. So it is very important for me to convince you about the wonders of my false self though the fear of being found out is horrifying.

* I like to start my day smoking a big blatt of gemara.

* Friend: “Can’t you go home?”
Luke: “I got a meeting.”
Friend: “It’s raining. Go home.”
Luke: “I got a disease. It’s like cancer.”

* ABC: FIGHT OVER LAST PIECE OF CHICKEN ENDS IN FATAL STABBING AT HOUSTON APARTMENT

HOUSTON — A fight over dinner has left one man dead, and another man charged with his murder.

At about 11:30 p.m. Friday, police say five men were fixing dinner and drinking in an apartment in the 1400 block of Lakeside Estates. Reinaldo Cardoso Rivera, 38, reportedly became angry when Darwin Perez Gonzalez, 34, took the last piece of chicken.

Police say the argument escalated into a fist fight in the parking lot, where Rivera allegedly stabbed Gonzalez and took off with a knife. Gonzalez died at the scene.

Rivera later returned to the scene and admitted to officers he stabbed Gonzalez. He was taken into custody and charged with murder. Officers say they recovered a kitchen knife in Rivera’s possession.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on What’s the loneliest place in the world? The Puerto Rican Cultural Center.

High IQ Communities

The highest IQ society in history was probably the ancient Greeks around the time of Plato (average of 120 is one guess). Many Ashkenazi communities today would average 120. The average IQ of a Modern Orthodox shul is probably close to 120 with an average household income in America of $120,000.

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on High IQ Communities

Gives new meaning to the term ‘Drill sergeant’

I am really glad that we now make it easier for gays to serve in the military.

Just what every straight guy wants in the trenches and the barracks and the showers — a little anal rape.

It was nice to have parts of life that were as desexualized as possible. Now we keep amping up the sexual frustration. More sexual freedom equals more sexual frustration. If you put straight guys in the showers and the barracks and alone in the bushes with young women, they’d be sexually frustrated and rapey as well.

Washington Times:

Far more military men are being raped by other men than is reported by the Pentagon because of the stigma attached to such sexual assaults, says a new study by the American Psychological Association.

“Rates of military sexual trauma among men who served in the military may be as much as 15 times higher than has been previously reported, largely because of barriers associated with stigma, beliefs in myths about male rape, and feelings of helplessness,” the APA said in releasing its findings Tuesday.

The Defense Department issues a biannual report on sexual assaults. Based on Internet emailed surveys it found that more men than women, in pure numbers, are sexually assault victims. Women make up about 14.5 percent of the 1.4 million active force.

“We know that there is under reporting among men and women and hope that this special issue will help to bring awareness and treatment for those that serve and protect us,” said the issue’s co-editor, Michi Fu, a clinical practitioner. “I personally wanted to pull together scholarship after hearing of reports of military sexual trauma being so much more prevalent than in the general population.”

Researchers said that even though the Pentagon survey, done most recently by the Rand Corps, is anonymous, men still are reluctant to disclose they were raped. The APA came to this conclusion by surveying a random group of 180 combat veterans, which led them to believe that the sexual assault rate is 15 times higher.

The rapes come at a cost to the men and the nation according to another survey of 2,042 veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

Posted in Armed Forces, Rape | Comments Off on Gives new meaning to the term ‘Drill sergeant’

“Becoming Who We Are”—An Immigration-Critical Jew Reflects On NPI’s Conference

Paul Gottfried writes: An article in the decidedly Leftist Huffington Post by the unmistakably Leftist reporter Samantha Lachman described the just-concluded conference of the National Policy Institute that I attended at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. on October 31 in a way that bore little resemblance to what I heard there [White Nationalists Gather On Halloween To Discuss How Oppressed They Are, October 31, 2015]. On the basis of an interview with the speakers, Samantha, who reveals she is Jewish, is sure that they, plus their audience, are working to create an American ”white ethno-state” and all think Jews have “rigged the American political system” to favor the immigration of non-Euro-Americans. Samantha also claimed that the conference was pushing the unspeakably outrageous idea of forcing “women back in the kitchen, 1950s style.” In her fevered imagination, America in the 1950s was equivalent to a Taliban society.

For the record, I am writing as an immigration-critical Jew, who is sick of the Leftist bigotry I regularly encounter in Samantha’s publication and others of its ilk. I readily confess to loving the 1950s America I grew up in, but I have no intention (nor did anyone I heard at the conference) of “forcing” women back into anything.

It’s not even that I think the sentiments or views in question are evil or even essentially wrong. I just didn’t hear them articulated in the talks or in the ensuing Q/A sessions.

One of the participants whom Samantha point-and-spluttered at, Professor Kevin MacDonald, has written about the extensive, lavish Jewish involvement in immigration expansion over the last hundred years. But this seems to be a matter of record rather than a sign of hating Jews. (See my critique of Professor MacDonald’s work as proof that I am not his lackey). It is also understandable that someone who deplores the political and social effects of immigration, particularly since 1965, would deplore the undeniable Jewish organizational support for this transformative process. And this would include Jewish as well as Christian opponents of this metamorphosis.

At the NPI gathering, on the theme “Become Who We Are,” no muzzles were placed on the speakers’ mouths in a way that Samantha and the increasingly repressive Main Stream Media want. But the most stimulating part of the experience for me was meeting dignitaries whom I’ve been reading for decades, e.g. MacDonald, whom I had previously known only through his writings and very occasional email messages; and the fiery French critic of Muslim immigration and (along with Alain de Benoist) a Grey Eminence of the French New Right, Guillaume Faye.

Kevin turned out to be as soft-spoken in person as he is fearless as a writer. Further, his talk on the origins of the white race was a model of scientifically-detached lecturing. He discussed two major components of European origins: aristocratic individualism deriving from Indo-European settlers, and egalitarian individualism stemming from Northern hunter-gatherers. The latter has been increasingly dominant since the 17th century and, he argues, is a critical component of contemporary Political Correctness. Notwithstanding Samantha, he did not mention Jews.

Faye by contrast was the ultimate in Gallic animation. Whether speaking in French or in his colorful Franglais, this visitor from the Old World never hid how he felt about “the Muslim invasion of my continent.”

I thought most of the speakers, and certainly the audience, less engaged in a racially-based ethnostate project than NPI’s spirited President, Richard Spencer, and his companion in arms Jack Donovan. To my delight, Richard in his opening remarks quoted or paraphrased Nietzsche, Heidegger, Spengler and Carl Schmitt—all authors on whom I have written. But I’m not sure that white nationalism would have made much sense to the German thinkers cited, given their time and circumstances.

Europeans think differently about such matters than Americans. Like most of the traditional French Right, Faye identified the oppositional “race” that Western Europeans have failed to take sufficiently into account as Asian and North African Muslims. Richard himself used the phrase “we Europeans,” but the problem of context remains. Once we step out of an American culture, racial antagonisms are not between whites and blacks but between civilizational enemies. In Israel, Jews refer to their Palestinian fellow-Semites in the way that Southern segregationists once used in referring to the Negro. The English and Irish show much of the same genetic make-up and share overlapping culture, but until quite recently (like Serbs and Croatians or Russians and Ukrainians) spoke of each other as ethnic antagonists.

This provocative, well-attended conference was supposed on focus on “becoming who we are,” and most of the speakers agreed there is a Euro-American identity that we should be trying to hold on to. There was also consensus that this identity has something to do with “European intelligence” and a “religious tradition,” even if the speakers were not always on the same page as to whether Christianity still belonged to that “tradition” or whether it had become like a maiden aunt who begins to rave at inconvenient times.

But discussions of this type necessarily become complicated when we get into “the other” as in Carl Schmitt’s friend/enemy relation. Different thinkers may list different “others” in telling us who are hostile to their communities. The conference I attended was no different in that respect—but it focused largely on the danger posed by the American Empire and its cult of “diversity.” Most of the presentations, for example, Keith Preston’s criticism of American liberal internationalist imperialism, and Sam Dickson’s remarks on the Confederate Battle Flag, approached the theme of “being who we are” by stressing who we are not.

Dickson, an extremely eloquent lawyer from Atlanta, observed that the slogan of well-meaning Southern whites that their flag is “about heritage, not hate” is a pitiful defense. As Dickson pointed out, since the “Southern heritage” has now been defined by the MSM and public educators as “hate”, someone who contrasts the “Southern heritage” to “hate” will be seen as talking nonsense.

Like Preston, Dickson considered his principal enemy, or that of the “Southern nation,” to be “American imperialism.” Southerners were early victims of this evil, even before it was turned into a means of delivering the rest of the world from who they are.

Preston, Dickson, and some of the other participants identified “American imperialism” with political and ideological centralization from the left together with a neoconservative foreign policy. Explicitly or implicitly these critics lean toward a secessionist solution, presuming they can find a critical mass to join their resistance.

Needless to say, the Wall Street Journal Editorial Page staff would not have felt comfortable in such company.

The keynote speaker, Faye, dealt with multicultural policies and their effects in European societies. Faye graphically and with appropriate facial contortions highlighted the “Muslim invasion” of Western Europe, and the receptiveness of the French and German Establishment to reconstruction by those whose heritage was different and openly antagonistic to European traditions.

But he was also (from my point of view) strangely confident that his fellow-Europeans would rise to the challenge. This would only happen, however, if “les plus forts” (the strongest—Faye employed the French phrase) assume leadership positions, and such self-hating European promoters of the “anti-European” European Community as Francois Hollande and Angela Merkel could be replaced.

Still, Faye was pessimistic about the possibility of Marine Le Pen, who heads the immigration-critical National Front, winning next year’s French presidential race. Marine, said Faye, can only count on the votes of about 30% of the French electorate and the other major parties, which are like our Democrats and Republicans, would band together behind a rival candidate to prevent someone on the non-approved right from gaining the French presidency.

Anti-white ethnomasochism and what Faye described as the “cult of xenophilia” were given appropriate attention at the conference. And all of the speakers and those among the attendees I conversed with had no trouble recognizing the core problems discussed.

Posted in Immigration, Jews, Paul Gottfried | Comments Off on “Becoming Who We Are”—An Immigration-Critical Jew Reflects On NPI’s Conference

Israel Restores Nationalism

Brett Stevens writes:

As I have mentioned before (at least eight years before), Israel will lead the way in restoring Nationalism, which is a world order where boundaries are defined by the simultaneous shared ethnicity, culture, and values of a population.

Now to the dismay of liberals everywhere, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has formalized that statement. In a brilliant act of statecraft that flew over the heads of mainstream media, Netanyahu both re-legalized the defense of an indigenous ethnic majority by a state, and announced his plans for Palestine:

Mr. Netanyahu said in a speech to the Zionist Congress on Tuesday night that “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews.” The prime minister said that the mufti, Haj Amin al-Husseini, had protested to Hitler that “they’ll all come here,” referring to Palestine. 

“So what should I do with them?” Mr. Netanyahu quoted Hitler as asking Mr. Husseini. “He said, ‘Burn them.'”

While Holocaust historians and revisionists — neither of whom have a good record of getting the truth right the first time — will debate this into the ground, Netanyahu’s statement was subtle and profound. He looked carefully at the camera as he spoke the words clearly and strongly, aware that he was making history — even if the rest of the media and pundits have not caught on. Here are the implications of what he said:

(1) If you merely want to expel a foreign population, that is not really a bad thing, if you are doing it to defend your own people.

(2) Nationalism is necessary. It was necessary for Germany, and now it is necessary for Israel. It is the only way to preserve a native population.

(3) Palestine has been the darling of Europe both in the 1930s and in the present day, and both times have led to disastrous results.

The American media missed all of these implications in their desire to fight the last World War over again, mainly because it allows them to dog whistle the civil rights conformity signal to their audience, which unites them in a buzzing hive-mind.

Germany, in accordance with the ways of democracy, which is essentially a popularity contest, tried to take the lead in the narrative by immediately embarking on a guilt-drenched retrospective. Europeans have long known that there is no such thing as bad publicity and so a public self-flagellation gains power more than a denial. In democracy, it’s important to stay in the spotlight by any means necessary…

Netanyahu realizes that Europe today, Israel today, Germany in the 1930s, and Israel in Biblical times share a problem: being small, higher-IQ and thus wealthier societies beset by vast hordes of angry, low-IQ, and impoverished third world people. The Palestinians, who are essentially the Mexican indios of the Middle East, consistently outbreed Jews and are using the womb as a strategy for conquest of Israel through the power of democracy. No sane politician — no leader — would allow that to happen to his people.

Israel needs the right to do what it was formed to do, which was to protect the Jewish people against not just Nazi-inspired murders — most of which happened in advance of the actual Nazis arriving — but the numerous pogroms that saw the Jewish people ejected from every country in Europe and the Middle East as well as some in Asia. This requires Nationalism, which is the exact same political system which was demonized in the wake of WWII.

Comments:

* Israel offers up a really good blueprint for us to follow in the West. No, it’s not entirely the same. Jews are different people than us. Still, they have created a sort of “Archeo-Futurist” template that we should study. Whatever you want to say about him, Bibi is a strong leader and certainly not a “cuck”!

* Israeli-style nationalism (indigenist ethnarchism) is a rough blueprint that is incredibly viable for many European and Asian countries, and many of the values present (revival of ancient culture, fierce anti-colonialism) would be highly beneficial to white countries in their current states.

* Whatever you want to say about him, Idi Amin is a strong leader and certainly not a “cuck”!

Whatever you want to say about him, Robert Mugabe is a strong leader and certainly not a “cuck”!

Whatever you want to say about him, Nelson Mandela is a strong leader and certainly not a “cuck”!

* Pray tell, what “hordes of angry, low-IQ, and impoverished third world people” were ‘besetting’ Germany in the 1930’s? Ashkenazi Jews? Um, news flash – the Ashkenazim outperform Germans on IQ tests (read books like “The Bell Curve” by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray plus “IQ and Global Inequality” by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen for proof).

You cannot compare what’s happening to Europe today (Germany included) with what happened to Germany in the 1930’s, though I know you’ll never stop trying. National Socialism was NOT nationalism! Rather, it was super-nationalism that masked itself as nationalism to woo over the German electorate. I seriously doubt the war-weary Germans of 1933 would have voted for the Nazis had they known about Hitler’s territorial ambitions in Eastern Europe. Hitler knew this as well, which is why he was quick to impose totalitarian rule shortly after he came to power.

I was involved in the White Nationalist movement years ago, until I got a belly full of it and left. I’ve yet to meet a WN (of Northern European extraction) who at heart isn’t a Nazi or Nazi sympathizer. Most of them also seem to think Adolf Hitler was the Second Coming. These idiots would then wonder why almost no one wanted to have anything to do with them.

Adolf Hitler, in addition to being a genocidal and democidal sociopath, single-handedly wrecked both European ethno-nationalist movements and the Eugenics movement. For that he can burn in Hell, and so can anyone who kisses his coat tails. You WN’s will just never get it. You’ll never go anywhere until you get over this love affair you have with a failed tyrant.

* The majority in the WN movement are aware that Hitler was not a White nationalist. he was a German nationalist and that he waged aggressive territorial German ethno-chauvanism which lead to the deaths of millions of White people. He didn’t know when to stop.
On the other hand one doesn’t have to be a full blow Hitlerist to be demonised as a “racist, fascist, bigoted, White supremacist, hate mongering Nazi.” You just have to be a White identitarian who believes we have the right to our own homelands and to live amongst our own kind and are under no moral obligation to hand over our lands, heritage and identities to competing alien peoples and cultures. So our enemies, the anti-Whites have evolved a kind of heads they win, tails we lose, Catch22, closed loop argument. The dice are loaded, the game is rigged and the fight is fixed.

* The crisis of 30s Germany had more to do with economic collapse and socialist agitation than it did with foreign invasion. Frankly, I’m not sure the German people ever really accepted Nazism. Hitler got into power more by parliamentary maneuvering than by popular acclaim. He stayed in power by offering a semblance of order and revenge for the defeat of WWI, which was what Germans really wanted. Everything else was peripheral.

* An interesting article, but one that avoids the inconvenient facts of leftist and jewish strategic goals. Both are presently winning the war to destroy the White race and European culture, even if they sit back and do nothing more the biological momentum is such that we will be overwhelmed within 20 years. The only way for us to survive is to somehow, probably an impossibility, achieve political power and start the process of massive repatriation and resettlement. No half measures will be tolerated, the bleeding hearts and the churches can squark all they like.
If Netanyahu wants to tell the world about his nationalist program, fine, we wish him well, but can anyone honestly believe the beltway elites are going to follow his lead! The elites circles in politics, business, and academia wouldn’t piss on ordinary White people if we were on fire. The noble burden has fallen on our shoulders, let’s clean up this mess our way, ourselves alone.

* Hungary is leading the restoration of nationalism within European Christian civilization, as Kevin MacDonald correctly predicted, while Israel, through its AIPAC henchmen in the USA such as Paul Singer, Sheldon Adelson, Haim Shaban etc. and their puppets, caused the refugee crisis by destroying Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Syria and Yemen (and Iran and Russia next?), which in turn provided a pretext for an invasion of welfare-seeking economic migrants – and all these gung-ho, Israel supporting war mongers in the Jewish diaspora are also the biggest supporters of open borders for White countries.

Netanyahu’s remark may help slow down the current surge of migrant invasion, by making the Germans feel a little less guilty and a little more wary of Muslim immigrants. Very well, this particular remark was good for Whites, but is there any evidence that Netanyahu sees us as anything other than cattle to be bilked of our blood and treasure for the good of the Jews, to be preserved only to the extent necessary to serve Jewish interests? If not, why has he never called off the dogs and told his powerful admirers in the diaspora to stop supporting open borders and stop supporting wars which, while providing slight benefits to Israel, cause immense damage to Middle Eastern Christians and to European peoples?

I say we should take Brett Steven’s advice and expel, if not from our nations then at least from our pro-White publications and organizations, those Jews whose only contribution seems to be incessant attempts to distract attention from, and make excuses for, the anti-White malice of diaspora Jewish elites.

If they were truly on our side they would use their Jewish privilege to undertake direct actions which, while necessary, would be counter-productive if undertaken by White men. Every people needs to take out its own trash. Von Stauffenberg understood this.

Posted in Israel, Nationalism | Comments Off on Israel Restores Nationalism

It’s Never OK To Marry A Wanker

12193678_1691950764374838_282590249691609412_n

Posted in Marriage | Comments Off on It’s Never OK To Marry A Wanker

Drugs, Realism & The Jews

The more powerful the individual, group or state, the more care outsiders will take with you. For instance, criticism of Jews will often end your career in America (just ask Rick Sanchez, Gregg Easterbrook) because of Jewish power.

As blacks rose in power in America during the 1960s, they increasingly replaced Jews from leadership positions in civil rights. As blacks gained, Jews lost.

As the Jewish population of America declined from 3% to 1.7%, the Jewish vote mattered less.

The higher the percentage of Jews in Israel, and the more Jewishly committed these Jews, the more powerful and secure Israel is.

Those who argue that America should assist China’s economic growth are advocating that America assist China with its billion plus people to become much more powerful than America.

I have an instinctive bias in favor of meritocracy and the free market but I want to be open about the consequences of this. Over the past couple of years, I’ve come to see at times higher values than capitalism, such as nationalism.

In a free market in baseball, the New York Yankees, the Los Angeles Dodgers and other big market teams would dominate, so Major League Baseball instituted revenue sharing to even the playing field.

This year, I watched all episodes of the Colombian miniseries on drug kingpin Pablo Escobar. I was fascinated by his story. I’ve always hated drugs but watching this series helped me to see things from the Colombian perspective. If they could make lots of money manufacturing and selling drugs to North America, why not? Why should they be expected to care about the welfare of North Americans? Do Americans care about the welfare of Colombians?

In the series, I watched many honorable people in Colombia who opposed the drug trade get slaughtered, and I started to think if there sacrifice was worth it. Why would an ordinary Colombian who was not a saint turn down an opportunity to create a better life for himself and his family? It suddenly made sense to me why Colombia, Mexico and company became narco states and it ceased making sense to me why so much domestic effort was put in these countries to reducing the narcotics trade.

I don’t expect people to be saints. I expect people to act in their self interest. So what was the self-interest of those who’ve fought the narcos in Colombia, Mexico etc?

Over the past couple of months, I’ve listened to many lectures on offensive realism by John J. Mearsheimer. He makes the obvious point that the richer a state gets, the more power it has to threaten other states. So I start thinking about the drug gangs. If they were not fought, they would increasingly take over their countries. With wealth comes power. So perhaps Colombians and Mexicans have had a strong incentive to fight the narco trade.

Then I started thinking about Jews. Ashkenazi Jews have an average IQ of around 108-120 while whites have an average IQ of about 100, East Asians of 105, American hispanics of 90 and African-Americans of 85. In a free market, Jews are going to dominate. Superior verbal IQ, in particular, will help Jews to dominate the media.

I don’t expect people to be saints. I expect individuals and groups to act in their self-interest. So as Jews rise in power, they are going to support policies that are good for Jews. This may not always be in interests of the natives and hence there’s going to be a reaction, which is generally called “anti-Semitism.”

With wealth and power, comes increased sexual access. I don’t expect Jews, or any group, to be saints, so some Jews will inevitably use their wealth and power to have sexual access to non-Jews. Most groups don’t like it when outsiders have sex with their women. So there’s going to be more conflict.

If drug traffickers are given a free hand to peddle their product, they are going to make tons of money, accumulate power and lots of sex.

If smart people are given a free market, they’re going to make lots of money, accumulate power, and have lots of sex.

Is the free market, then, always in the best interests of a nation? Or should it erect discrimination in favor of its majority?

The diaspora Chinese are known as the Jews of Asia because they are inevitably smarter and harder working than the natives and accumulate greater wealth and education.

My Ashkenazi friends from Australia generally regard Australians as dumb, racist, bigoted, mouth-breathing drunks who are lousy in business. My gentile Australian friends who know Jews in real life tend to regard them as elitists who lack mateship. About the only Australians who are anti-Semitic are those Aussie who encounter Jews in real life (particularly Sydney and Melbourne).

Australians have traditionally had one culture, and so the majority feels easy kinship while those who stick out, such as Orthodox Jews and Seventh-Day Adventists, are often hated. In multi-cultural America, by contrast, minority groups have an easier time and the majority is often uncomfortable.

In a free market, a minority who does not strongly identify with the majority population, is going to be more likely to peddle destructive things such as drugs, gangster rap, pornography, and the like. Crime rarely happens according to a race’s exact demographic percentage of the general population. Certain groups tend to dominate certain crimes. In the West today, however, it is usually considered impolite to point that out. Whose interests does that serve?

If Jews occupy themselves with Torah, Torah observance and a way of doing business that does not compete with non-Jews, perhaps they will be less likely to be hated by non-Jews.

Jews tend to be smart, educated, cohesive and hard-working. I’ve rarely thought of that as posing a threat to non-Jews. It seemed like a gift diaspora Jews were bringing their gentile countries. Jews were serving as a light unto the nations. Now I’m struggling with difficult questions. I’m starting to think that the rise of the Jews creates a reaction that is often fatal for Jews.

Brett Stevens writes:

Diversity does not work simply because it destroys culture by destroying standards. When you have two or more groups, standards differ, and thus an “official” Government standard must be created that includes both, which prevents each group from establishing its own cultural mores and values. This creates a Balkanization effect where each group withdraws, which prompts liberal democratic Government to try to force them to merge, resulting in genocide by the outbreeding of both.

But diversity doubly fails when it attempts third-world integration into the first world. It takes a population which is genetically predisposed to certain behaviors, and introduces a new population which is genetically hardwired for the exact opposite. This forces the first-world natives to become caretakers for the newcomers, exhausting themselves and turning their society into a battleground for the symbolic victory of diversity.

Netanyahu has had extensive experience with the Palestinians, who as a mixed-race population (Caucasian, Asian, and some North African) of third-world status have its typical traits: low IQ (in the low 90s), a lack of long-term planning ability, r-strategic reproduction, unruly social behavior requiring rule by warlords, and a tendency to blame first-world populations for their endemic poverty, disorder, crime, corruption, poor hygiene, and impulsiveness. With Palestinians within its borders, Israel can never properly exist, and it cannot protect the Jewish people who share a culture, languages, heritage/ethnicity, and religion.

Posted in Australia, China, Drugs, Jews, Nationalism | Comments Off on Drugs, Realism & The Jews

SPLC: Willis Carto, Longtime Anti-Semite and Holocaust Denier, Dies Aged 89

From a Jewish perspective, Willis Cato was a horrible man. I don’t know much about him, but he strikes me as a white nationalist, and hence a hero for his people.

From a Jewish and Western perspective, Osama Bin Laden was evil, but I can understand why many Muslims regard him as heroic.

Different groups have different interests and are engaged in a struggle to the death for scarce resources. What is good for whites is often bad for Jews, and what is good for Jews is often bad for whites. What is good for Jews and Christians is often horrible for Muslims and vice versa.

From SPLC: Willis Carto, founder of several radical right publications and organizations and a major American promoter of Holocaust denial, has passed away according to white nationalist reports.

According to reports from white nationalists, Willis Carto, a man active on the radical right for more than 60 years, has died, aged 89. Carto was one of the most active and influential white nationalists of the past century and leaves behind a legacy of vile racial hatred, especially towards Jews. He heavily influenced a number of racists who were active in the latter part of the twentieth century, such as Klansman turned-politician David Duke and William Pierce, founder of the National Alliance, at one-time the most dangerous and best organized neo-Nazi organization in America.

Carto devoted most of his early activism on the radical right to promoting the work of his predecessor, Francis Parker Yockey, a white nationalist ideologue who in his 600-page book Imperium pitched an upbeat message to beleaguered fascists, urging them to engage in a “world-historical struggle” and arguing that the fall of the Third Reich was merely a temporary setback that paved the way for a future triumph.

Carto founded the first major American Holocaust-denial outfit, the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), a group still active today despite the fact that Carto lost control of the group some two decades ago. In fact, Carto was one of the first American writers to deny the Holocaust in print, writing “‘Gas-chambers’ that did not exist were photographed, and a ‘gasmobile’ was invented to titillate the mechanically-minded.” Before founding IHR, Carto created the Liberty Lobby in the 1950s, an outfit that billed itself as a conservative, anti-Communist group. Liberty Lobby eventually became known for its advocacy of both white supremacy and anti-Semitism.

In the 1960s, Carto supported Alabama Governor George Wallace during his 1968 presidential bid. Carto co-authored a pamphlet headlined “Stand Up For America: The Story of George C. Wallace,” lauding the candidate as the only one capable of beating back “Blacky” and the Communist-dominated federal government. Carto’s Liberty Lobby mailed 175,000 copies to its subscribers and printed an additional 150,000 copies that were provided to the Wallace campaign for distribution.

In 1978, Carto started his most well known enterprise, IHR (under a parent organization called the Legion for the Survival of Freedom). IHR presented itself as a legitimate historical research group, devoted to “revisionism” — a term hijacked from a school of credible historians who offered new interpretations for the origins of World War I. In fact, the new organization was made up of white supremacists and Nazi sympathizers, and it would draw expertise from the like-minded from around the world. Its mission was to erase the Holocaust by any means at its disposal — including distortion, misquotation and outright falsification.

In 1984, Carto helped to found the far right Populist Party, which soon became a haven for white supremacists and other racial extremists. David Duke, the former Ku Klux Klan leader, captured the party’s presidential nomination in 1988, winning 0.05% of the national vote; in 1992, Bo Gritz, the former Green Beret and militia enthusiast, headed the party’s ticket, grabbing 0.1%, twice the amount that Duke had received.

Carto’s uncanny ability to find himself embroiled in legal battles also made him an extremely divisive figure on the radical right. He eventually lost control of both Liberty Lobby and IHR following a series of lawsuits brought against him by others in leadership roles in both organizations who accursed Carto of fraud and financial mismanagement.

In the early 2000s, Carto formed the anti-Semitic newspaper American Free Press (AFP) out of the ashes of Liberty Lobby’s Spotlight publication, as well as The Barnes Review (TBR), which has developed into America’s leading Holocaust-denial publication. Due to old age, Carto’s role with both publications diminished in recent years. In 2013, however, he attended and addressed an AFP event in Austin, Texas, featuring a number of other Holocaust deniers and anti-Semites such as Austin-based Texe Marrs.

AFP has suffered the loss of a number of its writers in the past few years. In 2013, Jim Tucker, known for his prolific writings on the Bilderberg Group, an annual gathering of world elites, died at age 78. In 2014, former Congressman Jim Traficant, a racist conspiracy theorist and AFP contributor, died in a farming accident. Earlier this year, another AFP stalwart, Michael Collins Piper also passed away.

Posted in Nationalism | Comments Off on SPLC: Willis Carto, Longtime Anti-Semite and Holocaust Denier, Dies Aged 89