Novelists Worth A Look

From the Chateau:

* Welsh novelist Tessa Hadley writes some fascinating fiction. Her novels tend to be somewhat episodic, like short story collections tenuously strung together, but there are some magnificent anti-feminist insights in them.

Her third novel, “The Master Bedroom”, portrays an early-40s Jewish literature professor’s midlife crisis, trying to seduce a married old flame while his son horndogs after her. The old flame’s current wife is an elementary school teacher and SJW maniac, whose long mental breakdown begins with her storming out of a Handel recital because Classical music is, according to her, “evil”.

Hadley’s use of musical tastes for psychological profiling is of immense interest. Her debut novel “Accidents in the Home” has the late 20s, PhD candidate and cohabiting mother become obsessed with snagging the club promoter boyfriend of her childhood BFF, a fashion model who wears a lip ring. On family holiday in Ireland, she sulks around alone, takes up smoking cigarettes and listens nonstop to techno mixes on her headphones, self-consciously profanating her mind and her middle class existence, longing for a cold slick world of postmodern emptiness, fantasizing about the promoter’s apartment full of cold chrome fixtures.

Fay Weldon’s late novels, like the horrific “She May Not Leave”, have turned into delirious anti-feminist satires. Weldon’s actually a better writer than Hadley (more energetic and more rabidly funny), and her Conspiracy Theorist’s Tale in “The Spa” is a full-out anti-Cultural Marxist manifesto.

* Wolfe’s I am Charlotte Simmons-even the church girls get hypergamy. Charlotte has spergy SJW Adam in the friend zone, longs for ZFG uber-Alpha Hoyt, and is an alpha widow notwithstanding snagging JoJo the basketball player (her beta bucks). So much sad truth in that one.

Posted in Feminism, Literature | Comments Off on Novelists Worth A Look

Joseph Randle – Another Talented Black Man Throwing It All Away

How many times have we seen this type of self-destruction?

He should be the leading runner for the Dallas Cowboys, earning millions of dollars a year, but he’s too much of an idiot to hold down that job.

REPORT: Still, over the last 12 months, he was arrested for shoplifting cologne and underwear, then again four months later on marijuana and domestic violence charges.

Just last week — a turbulent one at that as he suddenly disappeared from the Cowboys’ plans — he called the cops to his place, thinking his girlfriend might be in trouble.

Of course, that was just his record with the authorities. After the shoplifting arrest, a police video caught him replying to a possible suspension with the bon mot, “Dez didn’t miss no games for slapping his mama.” Also asked a female jail employee for a $100 massage. On top of that embarrassment, he got into it with Dez Bryant at practice over the line about Dez’s mother, only to be silenced by Jason Witten.

Bottom line: With Randle, it was always something, little of it any good.

The theft charge was dismissed and authorities decided not to pursue the domestic violence allegations, but Randle wasn’t so lucky with the NFL, which is about to fine or even suspend him.

Only the Cowboys released him first, not 48 hours after Jerry Jones said he was concerned about Randle’s mental health.

If Randle does, indeed, have some sort of mental illness, let’s hope first and foremost he gets the help he needs. Life won’t get any easier now that he’s out of the NFL, which is where he’s likely to remain with a suspension hanging over him. Unlike his former teammate, Greg Hardy, he can’t be assured someone else will take a chance on him. He doesn’t have the numbers to make him worth the risk.

Posted in Blacks, Dallas | Comments Off on Joseph Randle – Another Talented Black Man Throwing It All Away

Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice

Published on Nov 2, 2015:
Join Bend the Arc and the American Jewish community in pledging to stand against anti-immigrant hatred: http://bendthearc.us/AgainstHatred

It was wrong then. It’s wrong now.

Murderer. Rapist.

In the last few months, too many American politicians have been hurling bigoted slurs like these at our nation’s immigrants.

We’ve heard this ugly kind of hatred before. Many of our parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, and millions of other Jewish immigrants, faced this same kind of hate when they arrived. We were called these very same things. We were told we’d never be real Americans.

The millions of immigrants living in the U.S. today were driven here by the same hope for a better life that brought so many of our ancestors here. They are our friends, our family, our neighbors, and they contribute to the life and economy of this nation as much as anyone.

Bend the Arc put this ad on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and NBC to spark a critical conversation. Because denying the dignity of millions of Americans has no place in our national politics.

Join Bend the Arc and the American Jewish community in pledging to stand against anti-immigrant hatred. If thousands of us raise our voices together we can deliver the powerful message that our community refuses to be silent and put those using this hateful rhetoric on notice.

Will you add your name to our call and spread the word?

Posted in Immigration, Jews | Comments Off on Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice

How Have Australians Held On To Australia?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I’ve thought a lot about why Australians work to maintain their culture. They are unique among all Western nations in doing this.
I think it ties into Steve’s theory about how Western culture literally killed off their violent members over hundreds of years. What no one talks about, and what seems clear has happened, is that a tipping point of some kind has been reached in the West where we have become TOO civilized. We treat our own cultural survival as something to work against.
Australia has never reached the point of cultural sophistication normal in all other first world nations. They are proudly uncouth. They are descendants of criminals and jailers and are proud of the fact. They speak in a manner which one local researcher claims is a result of everyone in the entire country being drunk during its formation (not as outlandish a claim as it may seem).

* The thing about the ‘refugee’ debate in Australia is that it started a long time ago – almost 15 years – and we’ve gone all the way from harsh, then to compassionate, then back to harsh again. So all the complaints, pleas, moral blackmail etc. has been debated, heard and exhausted many times over.

It went like this:

1)The boat-people problem explodes under a conservative government. Refugees travel through multiple safe countries so they can claim asylum in wealthy Australia. The government puts them in detention centres and processes them according to our U.N. treaty obligations.

2)But crusading left-wing lawyers and left-wing judges make deporting the ‘asylum seekers’ almost impossible, so most end up staying.

3)Word gets back along the people smuggling network that if you get to Australia you will be detained for a while but then get residency so even more are encouraged to come and the problem gets even worse. Refugee boats sink in rough seas and many hundreds drown. Asylum seekers are kept in detention centres in the desert. The Left and the professional grievance industry become hysterical.

4)But then a crisis! Some boat-people actually hijack a Norwegian cargo ship called ‘The Tampa’ and force the captain to take them to Australia. The Australian government forbids the ship entry to Australian waters but the captain ignores this order and continues coming. The Government acts strongly by sending the Australian SAS to board the ship and prevent it’s entry.

5) The government then uses this incident to attempt to change the law to allow ‘off-shore’ processing on small Pacific islands. The purpose of this change is to take the refugees outside the jurisdiction of Australian courts. This will give the government a much freer hand in deporting people. On the eve of an election the Left-wing Opposition loses their nerve and backs the government’s legislation.

6) Slowly but surely the policy works. Word gets back that asylum seekers are no longer getting Australian residency and the numbers coming steadily drop. Eventually the problem is solved. The detention centres empty. Everyone assumes the issue has been decided.

7)The government changes. And in an act of mind-boggling stupidity the new Left-wing government undoes all of the laws which had worked, including offshore processing. Presumably they thought with the conservatives having done all the hard, nasty work they could get moral bragging rights without any cost.

8)The refugee boats return. The Left-wing government refuses to admit they’ve made a mistake and allows the numbers to increase. Eventually thousands arrive every week. Many boats sinks and many hundreds of refugees drown. Belatedly the government tries to stem the flow but fail. They don’t have the nerve to get tough.

9)The governments falls and the conservatives return to power. The new government restores offshore processing and also physically turns boats around, towing them back to Indonesia. They even put refugees in unsinkable life-rafts and send them back in those.

10)The policy works and the boat people arrivals return to zero.

Throughout this long saga we heard every moral argument the Left had to make many times over. Eventually the Conservatives won the day by acting harshly and getting results – while claiming a humanitarian motive (you need to stop the boats to stop the drownings).

Of course white Australians are being replaced by massive legal immigration anyway so the only difference is we get to choose our replacements rather then have to accept whoever turns up.

* It is worth looking at the Human Development Index, which puts Australia at No 2 (behind Norway but ahead of Switzerland, The Netherlands and the US). It’s not a measure of cultural sophistication exactly, but a fair proxy for it.

There is an element of truth in the “descendants of criminals” claim, and some Australians have a propensity to boast of it. But the proportion of convict ancestry in the Australian population is actually very small (perhaps 2 per cent overall; zero in my own case). At any rate it doesn’t tie into Steve’s theory about the West killing off its violent members: none of the convicts was transported here for homicide and our historical and current homicide rates are comparable to most European countries’ (and white America’s).

On top of that, we also are plagued by academics and an MSM that have all the same obsessions as they do in the rest of the West (perhaps that is what you mean by ‘cultural sophistication’). They have prevailed in the past on open borders; but by good fortune they don’t prevail right now.

* I think some of it has to do with the vast stretches of wilderness that comprise Australia, where urban areas are a minute fraction of the overall landscape. That and their isolation from the rest of Western Civilization give them a more rugged, individualistic outlook. Also, the number of people of non-Anglo-Celtic heritage only began to increase since WW2. Whenever Anglophone countries start bringing in people of non-Anglo-Celtic background the first order of business of the new arrivals seems to be to destroy the Anglo-Celtic majority By Any Means Necessary.

* Australia has held off “same-sex marriage” longer than the rest of the (white) Anglosphere.

* In terms of livability (discounting the current insane property bubble) it is clearly one of the best places on earth to live.
It is, however, not a place where snobs are welcome. Socially it is intentionally very low brow. A bar on one of Sydney’s fanciest streets made the news because they banned reflective vests as acceptable attire! People with blue collar and white collar jobs mix socially. That may seem normal if you live in Australia but is not elsewhere. Blue collar and white collar work is rewarded fairly equally – inconceivable elsewhere. The “Aussie Battler” is part of the political lexicon.
Realistically the percentage of people with convict/jailer ancestory is dramatically higher than 2%. Australia was a penal colony and everyone in some way was connected to it. There was no other game in town for a long time. An Australian family who is not a fairly recent immigrant story almost certainly has part of their bloodline from this period.
My point is that the bottom group of English society managed to create one of the best countries on earth when given a blank slate (with apologies to the Aboriginals). Why is this? Why are they the only ones intent on maintaining a great country?

* Americans seem to want to cling on to this myth that Australia is somehow different. That at least one white country is not so set on demographic suicide. Unfortunately this couldn’t be further from the truth.

White Australians are being replaced as quickly here as in any other part of the world. The hard line on boat arrivals is a fig leaf for runaway legal migration, which has the support of the financial and business elite, as it does everywhere else. Current legal migration leves from Asia, Africa and the Middle East will eventually make White Australians a minority unless an explicitly pro-white immigration policy is implemented.

The likelihood of that is next to zero in the current climate. Australia is as firmly in the grip of the cultural marxist agenda as anywhere else. Any claim to an Australian identity based on shared British, or even European, heritage is met with the utmost outrage and incredulity. We are supposed to agree that being Australian requires nothing more than putting a hand out for a passport.

The notion that maybe the famous Australian stereotype, popularised by the likes Crocodile Dundee and Steve Irwin, was a reflection of the British people that built the country, rather than some voodoo magic that overcomes a person when he arrives on this particular piece of clay, is unspeakable.

I feel that our allies in the US and Europe do us a disservice by propagating the myth that we somehow have a stronger sense of our selves and our own preservation. Things down here are going in exactly the same direction as they are up north and I don’t expect anything to change for us until it does for you.

* Australia is just a committed to national suicide as the ret of the western world. Our immigration intake is insanely high.

The crackdown on boat people was a smokescreen to distract Australians from the real problem which is legal immigration.

And you won’t find much testosterone in our new prime minister. Malcolm Turnbull is a hand-wringing SJW.

Posted in Australia, Immigration | Comments Off on How Have Australians Held On To Australia?

Rod Dreher: The Fragility of Historical Memory

Rod Dreher writes:

A new Pew religious landscape survey is out today, and it shows that 1) overall, America is becoming a less religious country, and 2) the devout are in some ways becoming more devout, and the secularization is coming from the large number of Millennials who are losing their faith.

The clear conclusion is that Christianity in America is dying because its culture is dying. Do not forget sociologist Philip Rieff’s dictum: “The death of a culture begins when its normative institutions fail to communicate ideals in ways that remain inwardly compelling, first of all to the cultural elites themselves.” The faith is not being passed on to the young. This is measurable. So many of us Christians think that yeah, our kids may not be so observant, but they’ll come around in the end. The faith will always be here. I think this is extremely naive, because it does not take into account the fragility of historical memory in modernity.

A Jewish friend says to me:

He has become more and more convinced that as our society becomes secularized, religious Christians in particular will be marginalized. Because he accepts the truth of Christianity, he doesn’t want this to happen and has been exploring what he calls the “Benedict Option” after St. Benedict, to realize that Christians are in a society that is profoundly hostile to them, but to cleave together in communities (not necessarily physically removed from the mainstream) to continue to reinforce each other’s faith, inculcate their faith in their children and serve as an example to others of the value of embracing a Christian life.

This post is sort of a complement to that and one that I think says something that both you and I agree with. You as a convert to Traditional Jewish practice realizing that your community is actually safer in a country to upholds traditional Christian values, than one in which all traditional moral values have been significantly eroded, and that I agree with because although I am an agnostic, I recognize that despite the special pleadings of the ignorant persons about the separation of church and state, recognize that the civic state of America rests soundly on the bedrock of liberal but still faithful Christian religious adherence. It is true that our society is remarkably tolerant of non believers and of non Christians, but that is only possible because although we never had a state religion, we had a defacto generalized Christianity. And it was the fact that bizarre sects including Latter Day Saints, Adventists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Black Muslims, and diametrically opposed non Catholic denominations such as Presbyterians, Methodists, Baptists, Congregationalists and Lutherans all were able to freely practice and proselytize without killing each other. And Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and Muslims all coexisted as long as they were distinct minorities.

Jews, deliberately, or inadvertently, whether as a result of Jews being both the leaders of cultural Marxism, psychoanalysis, traditional Marxism, conspicuous consumption capitalism, civil liberties lawsuits, etc, have done much, and probably the most to weaken Christianity.

I.B. Singer wrote: “The powers that assail us are often cleverer than every one of our possible defenses; it is a battle which lasts from the cradle to the grave. All our devices are temporary, and valid only for one specific attack, not for the entire moral war. In this sense I feel that resistance and humility, faith and doubt, despair and hope can dwell in our spirit simultaneously. Actually, a total solution would void the greatest gift that God has bestowed upon mankind – free choice.”

Posted in Christianity | Comments Off on Rod Dreher: The Fragility of Historical Memory

‘Weapons Of Mass Migration’

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* These events should just be called invasions.

Who cares if the invaders aren’t wearing uniforms or carrying guns? They are invading.

They are trespassing.

If someone were to come onto my property uninvited and refuse to leave, I would call the cops, and the trespassers would be removed under threat of force.

* No machine guns in Europe, no destroyers, no atomic bombs? What these foreigners do is irrelevant, this is totally the fault of the white-hating leftist/minority coalition in Western countries and the cucks who tolerate their existence.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on ‘Weapons Of Mass Migration’

Does Jonathan Franzen Belong On The Alt-Right?

Comments at the Chateau:

* Houellebecq, along with Tom Wolfe, are the greatest novelists of our age and, not coincidentally, they are also alt-right, neodark, reactoshivvian crimethinkers and sexual market surveyors of unparalleled keen perception.

The Left’s causes are exhausted, and their art reflects that. The Right’s causes have only just gathered strength, and their art is ascendant. Rebellion has always been a friend to expression.

* Franzen’s ‘Freedom’ is definitely a self-aware effort to extensively explore Evpsych’s cad-dad theories in literary form, and also contains some jabs at NPR-land and its Keillorite kapital in Minnesota.

IMO, ‘Freedom’ is largely successful in that exploration, though Franzen is far from being ‘one of us’ – at most, he’s a man of the Left who has become skeptical, is aware of the artistic power of Evpsych, and has some ability to insert our ideas esoterically into fiction that the reading classes will, well, read.

‘Purity,’ his most recent, is considerably less successful in this regard. It’s essentially gynocentric and progressive in its message, although it has its moments, and there is some good analysis of the cynicism of East German Marxism and the Left, and some tribute to the ability of alpha Game to thrive in any political environment (as it should, since archetype transcends ideology).

* Having studied literature in the leftist halls of academe, I cannot begin to describe how much Tom Wolfe is despised in those precincts. They consider him crass, and declasse.

But he is heir to the great novelistic tradition of Cervantes, Fielding, Dickens, and Trollope. At turns parodic yet penetratingly realistic, his work will be read long after lightweights like Toni Morrison are gathering dust.

I saw him once walking on streets of Manhattan –cape, white suit, fedora, dark shirt with upright color in the early 20th century tradition. The guys is a peacock in every sense.

* Tom Wolfe is absolutely brilliant, I’ve read all his work (multiple times), and the day that I learned he was shunned by academicians was the day I knew I wouldn’t be an academician.

N.B. He considers himself an heir to Zola and Balzac.

COMMENTS TO STEVE SAILER:

* My guess, re Franzen’s politics, is that he’s to the right of the current zeitgeist, but not necessarily a rightest in an absolute sense. A Reagan Democrat sort of guy. Freedom was pretty brutal to neocons and miners (one of the most right-leaning industries, by political donations) but also to environmentalists and NYC cat ladies on the left.

* The late John Updike was blithely unconcerned that many of the more literary members of Official Victim Groups feel oppressed by the fact that white men continue to make up a wildly disproportionate fraction of the most talented writers. Updike’s combination of overwhelming talent and well-adjusted Middle Americanness was particularly enraging to the rising powers.

The new generation, in contrast, has been acutely aware of being hated for who they are, with varying impacts: defiance in the case of Houellebecq, conflictedness and depression in the case of poor [David Foster] Wallace.

Updike worked really hard on The Coup, studying Africa for about a year before writing. Then he worked really hard on Rabbit Is Rich, taking approaching 3 years to write it.

After that, as he was in his 50s, he went to a book a year schedule and didn’t do anything that ambitious again.

Updike was quite convinced that he peaked in his later 40s and then went into steady decline, which he was oddly cheerful about. He didn’t try to stretch out the time between his books to keep up his quality level as he got older. He was kind of like Woody Allen, who peaked at about the same era in the late 1970s-early 1980s, and has stuck to a one movie per year schedule ever since. They had kind of a jock attitude that each year brings a new season and you rack up the best statistics you can, but you’re not going to get better as you get older.

* Franzen and Wallace were friends. With Franzen as the bitter, less-talented friend who relished Wallace’s death as a chance to step out of his shadow and claim the mantle of the Great American Writer of his Generation. Except nobody really cared while DFW is still revered.

* Though he denied it, it is clear from the recent biography that a lot of Updike’s writing was auto-biographical. After he remarried, his 2nd wife kept a much tighter rein on him. His more stable domestic life made him happier but probably a less interesting writer.

* One look at Houellebecq tells you he does not care. Up and coming writers writers, artists or journalists don’t dare say anything not politically correct about immigration, I expect they would be warned about the effect on their careers.

According to Martin van Creveld, France (and Germany) are far more open to anti feminist thought than the UK or US . Houellebecq like several others mentioned is basically an anti feminist writer.

* Like how Norwegian Knausgaard hates the Swedes, Frenchman Houellebecq resents the Anglo-Americans and their ideas such as feminism and free free market economics.

It’s a problem for patriots: how do you keep from annoying neighbors that you agree with over big issues just because they annoy you? One solution is to be big about it, but that takes some maturity. And the globalists can often easily manipulate patriots into snits over Freedom Fries and the like.

Posted in Literature, Tom Wolfe | Comments Off on Does Jonathan Franzen Belong On The Alt-Right?

‘Is throwing blacks off of planes and trains for being rowdy the next big thing?’

Steve Sailer sets the scene.

US-based Spirit Airlines accused of racism after throwing 6 black passengers off plane

Passengers of Spirit Airlines Flight 868 accused the company of racism after an altercation over a seat resulted in three black couples being escorted off of the plane at Los Angeles International Airport.
The confusion Monday night started after the passengers claimed the seat was double-booked. After a white flight attendant accused a member of the group of being a threat, the police came and took the six people off of the plane, witnesses told CBS Los Angeles.

“I’m really humiliated just for the simple fact that you hear about this type of stuff happening in America, discrimination issues and stuff like that, but to actually experience it first-hand,” Alexandria Wright, one of the six passengers in the center of the controversy, told the channel.

“It was more than just us having the conversation. Why is that six black people got kicked off the plane?” Wright asked.

Group of black women kicked off Napa wine train after laughing too loud

The 11 women, all members of the same book club, boarded the Napa Valley Wine Train, excited to sip wine in a historic rail car with the scenic northern California vineyards as a backdrop.

One book club member, Lisa Renee Johnson, shared a video on Facebook.

“We made it, y’all,” she said on the video Saturday morning, beaming as her friends waved in the background. “Look at us. We are getting ready to get on the wine train.”

Johnson continued to chronicle the experience through photographs and videos, showing the members of Sistahs on the Reading Edge, many wearing matching black book club T-shirts, as they clinked wine glasses and ate appetizers.

Then two hours in, the train ride turned sour for the book club from Antioch, Calif.

WOW! They paraded us through 6 cars and none of us are even drunk…the police were waiting?

Posted by Lisa Renee Johnson on Sábado, 22 de agosto de 2015

Another passenger scolded the women, saying, “This is not a bar,” according to Johnson’s Facebook page.

Train workers told the women that they had to leave because they were too loud. About 1 p.m., they were met by police officers and given a bus ride back to the station.

Johnson blames racial bias — all but one of the book club members on the train are African American. The hashtag #laughingwhileblack, which Johnson used on her Facebook page, has taken off on social media, with many vowing to boycott the wine train.

“We sipped wine, enjoyed each other’s company but our trip is being cut short,” Johnson wrote. “If we all laugh at the same time it’s loud!”

According to train officials, the women’s laughter had prompted complaints, and workers asked them three times to quiet down.

“It wasn’t an issue of bias,” train spokesman Sam Singer said, adding that conflicts involving overly boisterous passengers occur about once a month. “It was an issue of noise.”

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on ‘Is throwing blacks off of planes and trains for being rowdy the next big thing?’

Wedding video – Bas Kol – בס-קול חיים שלמה מאיעס

Posted in Hasidim | Comments Off on Wedding video – Bas Kol – בס-קול חיים שלמה מאיעס

Whites In Decline

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* The self-extermination of whites via depression and demoralization will continue until morale improves.

* And to think, 50 years ago our best minds were certain that men really wanted out of those horrible factory jobs, so they could pursue self-actualizing dreams instead. You know, write a book, or something.

Truth is, most of us didn’t know what to do with ourselves in the absence of really obvious gifts or ambition. A factory job, a mill job, an office job…whatevs.

* As a society, as a civilization we used to celebrate accomplishments and achievements. Now we celebrate the growing acceptance of degenerate forms of human behavior.

In the past it was the first men in the air; the first man to break the sound barrier; the first man to run the four minute mile; the first man on the moon etc. Now it is the first openly gay person on TV, the first gay kiss, the first “out” athlete in whatever sport; the first transgendered person on the cover of some magazine. The benchmarks by which we now measure our progress are completely inverted from the customary mode by which any previous civilization measured its ascent.

I believe this to be the fundamental difference between the old America and the new America. So the above priorities don’t surprise me in the least.

* I am wondering what the spin is going to be when one of these transgender “girls” sexually assaults a female classmate in the girls’ locker room. It seems inevitable that it’s eventually going to happen.

A mature adult who has had to struggle with the issue for years is one thing. A transgender person who’s willing to pay a significant social cost for being transgender, I can believe. But having once been a heterosexual teenage boy, it seems perfectly plausible to me that a troubled heterosexual teenage boy with a low sexual market value might embrace the chance to go ogle naked girls in the shower just by claiming he “feels like a girl.” If he’s already a nobody, what’s he got to lose by pretending to be even more of a weirdo? From his perspective, there’s just very little cost to saying “I’m really a girl” just to get in the girls’ locker room.

I feel like I’m watching a car crash in slow-motion, and we’re at the part where we can see the crash is unavoidable but there’s no way to step in and stop it from happening.

I guess when it eventually happens, we’ll get some variation of the “well, it would have been just as wrong if it were committed by a cisgender girl” argument. As if the whole episode was just one of those “whaddya gonna do” things that nobody could have possibly foreseen.

You know society is doomed when you have to expend intellectual energy defending the basic principles that prior generations just took as common sense.

* Steve, when are you going to break your silence on THE COYWOLF?

* Haven’t I written about it multiple times over the years? It comes up in “Race Does Not Exist” discussions because here we have not races but legally recognized separate species (wolves have typically been protected by the Endangered Species Act), but the boundaries between the species are fuzzy. You could apply the same standards used to say race does not exist to dogs/coyotes/wolves to say that species don’t exist. But species do exist, although it’s difficult to come up with an all purpose definition.

* Say what you like about Eric Fromm and his Frankfurt School affiliations, but he, at any rate, like the Early Marx and Veblen, stressed the point about how humans need to be productive in their daily endeavors.

By “productive” Fromm, Veblen and Marx meant only that we engage in some-what meaningful work. This work didn’t need to be earthshakingly original or daring, just socially useful and personally rewarding. Of course, they recognized that “personally rewarding” varies with the individual’s capacities and their inherent strengths and weaknesses.

The alternative, Fromm maintained, was a sense of meaninglessness, concomitant anger and destructiveness.

Additionally, Fromm (from insight derived through years of listening to people air their grievances and gripes) came to understand that people need a meaningful “frame of reference” that lent their lives some transcendental order and sense of rightness. “Transcendental” doesn’t necessarily imply a particular organized religion along with its pantheon of hoary gods but it does imply that people need to feel as though they belong to some larger coherent Gestalt in which their lives unfold, interaction with which gives their lives some sense of purpose and value.

We see today the dissolution of society’s answer to both of these essential needs and the tragic consequences. Looking at the unemployment rates among both uneducated, young blacks and middle-aged white workers and it becomes obvious that our society is falling apart. Leading unproductive lives results in their feelings of worthlessness and purposelessness. According to their genetic predispositions the one revenges itself by taking out their anger on society (with innocent “random” whites in particular suffering the brutal consequences of their selfish rage) and the other responds through self-destructive behavior. That this should be surprising to any competent social scientist is itself surprising.

Additionally, the left’s assault on society’s root narratives and myths has deprived people of a transcendent, coherent frame of reference. Their heroes have been slandered and villainised and their cultural icons (statues) have been literally defaced, removed or toppled. Their yearly calendar of religious events has been erased. Memorials to criminal shysters such as MLKing as well as holocaust “museums” defile our sacred public places. The great insights and laws of our Founding Fathers are subjected to “deconstruction” by third-rate minds which have themselves, contributed nothing (comparatively) to the comfort and advancement of the human race. The marvelous inventions (by white men) that have raised the lives of billions of this planet’s people from grinding poverty are reviled as tools of oppression. Everything is topsy turvy as the left rejoices in proclaiming the second coming of a “brown world” and celebrates the elevation to rule of those who, hitherto, have demonstrated no particular talent in conceiving or erecting this mirage-like paradise on Earth–or even a fully functioning democratic, first-world economy.

What do these reformers have to offer except black-demogogue-preacher-revival-style “hope and change”? Certainly no long-term tangible prospects. Just handouts and the immediate gratification provided by reaction to or against an unresponsive Social Order; neither of which provides a productive life nor a meaningful larger frame of reference.

* Maybe there’s an insidious link between drugs and pernicious and cultural destructive ideas, both of which have been aggressively peddled to Western culture? Maybe Lyndon Larouche was on to something in his book Drugs, Inc., where he identifies these peddlers and exposes their ultimate goal.

* It will become increasingly difficult for aging European Americans to pay their medical deductible costs in a system that caters to the fastest growing, least productive segments of the population. Black and brown unwed mothers will get all their baby costs and emergency room visits paid for, while retired Smiths and Joneses who worked all their lives will have a hard time coming up with their share of a hernia operation, hip replacement, or dental care.

Greater and greater numbers of them will see declining real value in their monthly Social Security deposits, forcing them to make tradeoffs for necessities — and in many cases sell their homes in a declining market. (They won’t be able to afford their property taxes in cities that have to pay school personnel to babysit and feed all those brown babies.)

Their retirement investments or pensions will shrink or disappear as more and more states and municipalities go bust under the weight of supporting those same growing, unproductive groups. Their investment advisers will unwisely have them in a bubble. (Look around, you are in a bubble now. See the colorful soapy colors swirling around? Isn’t it beautiful as the DOW keeps rising…)

As they say, getting old sucks — but getting old in a declining civilization sucks even more.

* Trump just did a presser at Trump Tower in NYC. I listened to 75%. It’s great. He hasn’t backed down a bit on immigration, the wall, anchor babies, etc. When he was needled that “walls don’t work” he shot back, “look at Israel.” He’s listening to the drumbeats.

Whatever his flaws, whatever happens, we have to be grateful to him for performing the public service of destroying the taboo against mentioning illegals, anchor babies, and a wall. Without Trump it would be Rubio v. Bush.

* It becomes particularly toxic for whites who lack the ability to put into words what you have eloquently spelled out here, but still innately feel the topsy-turvy nature of the world today. Exacerbating the issue is that they feel inadequate to talk openly about it, for fear of being shamed or losing an argument with someone using words like ‘heteronormative’. Then there’s the shame associated with not defending yourself.

* It seems to me that for a whole bunch of reasons, the backbone of this country has been the vast percentage of this country that was white and not too far from average.

What’s going to happen when America’s vast percentage of white middle class and working class people are no longer a majority, can no longer afford to pay a majority of the taxes, no longer can be counted on to contribute the hours and money to local charities that they once did?

The problem isn’t just that whites are becoming a minority, it’s that they are finally finding themselves being affected and dragged down by the some of the same things that have affected other groups for years. Being white and not a screwup isn’t enough to guarantee a living wage job anymore. Being white and not a screwup isn’t enough to keep social problems like addiction and children who don’t know their fathers, etc. away from most white families door anymore.

I expect that the crime rate for whites will creep up and that we may see that whites start operating gangs or joining those of other groups in significant numbers.

We’ll see lots more whites with chronic problems, low incomes, etc. needing help instead of providing it. As a result, America will have a much higher percentage of needy people and a much lower percentage of workers who are net tax contributors.

As a group, it seems inevitable that whites will start to lose many of their distinctive positive traits and advantages in our society and become more like the various minority groups who historically have not done so well in our country.

I don’t think anybody’s thinking about this or prepared for it.

It’s all a recipe for disaster.

MORE COMMENTS:

* People who read the Book of Proverbs are less likely to put the non-obese of either sex on a pedestal; less likely to grovel to those who make suspiciously pleasant drugs available; less likely to give in to their selfish inclinations. Fewer people now read the Book of Proverbs than in previous years. Consequently, suicidal behaviors are up. That being said, both of my friends who committed suicide (early 80s, late 90s) were, as an earlier comenter said, in “the bottom quartile of attractiveness”, hard as they tried not to be (to brutally simplify – and I am allowed to be brutal about the facts, since I non-brutally pray for the poor guys nearly every day of my life – they were unmistakably in that bottom quartile, despite endless hours at the gym for one of them – well, a few hours, anyway… and for the other one, exhausting attempts at being an accomplished hipster folk singer, that sort of thing). I had moved away from the towns my friends lived in long before their suicides. When obesity rates triple, as they have in recent years, the bottom quarter of male attractiveness is, for those men (and for those lesbians) who idolize the comparative good of sexual pleasure with average or above average women, a very very bad place to be. I wish I had been there for my poor idolatrous friends to talk them out of their idolization problems. I would have explained to them that, with the exception of the morbidly obese, overweight women can be very pleasant sexual partners, within a loving committed relationship. Those who know that are at a lower risk for suicide, I kid you not. Also, and equally important (yes I understand statistics) pleasant drugs and violent dramatic gestures should be repulsive to people who other people care about, one just needs to discover, or rediscover, those people who care about you. Anyway, I too have read the Book of Proverbs and regret not being as true a friend as I should have been. If you don’t want to read the whole book, just pick a number from one to nine and read again and again the chapters ending in that number (1, 11, 21, 31; 2, 12, 22.; my favorites, 7, 17, 27).

* Pathetic. It’s ridiculous when people attribute minority dysfunction to societal factors. It’s just as sad to read all these comments blaming societal trends for the increase in white mortality.

Individuals decide their own fate. If you have a crappy job, work hard to get a better one. If you are overweight, get off the couch and run around the block instead of eating more Fritos. And for Christ’s sake, if you must indulge in an illegal intoxicant, go find yourself a weed dealer instead of smoking meth and popping OxyContin.

None of this stuff is easy (except for finding the weed dealer part). But, who said life was easy? The best things in life are those paid for in toil, sweat and diligence.

* Isn’t this something along the lines of what happened in Russia before Putin? I think Anatoly Karlin had a detailed post a while back indicating that Russia’s demographic problems have largely subsided in the Putin Era, one of the many reasons he has a 90% approval rating and our own elites are sometimes struggling to break 20%.

I’ve been saying for years we should send a delegation of American Notables to Moscow to offer Putin the American Throne. Betcha he’d solve our domestic problems double-quick since he’s had lots of experience handling parasitic Oligarch-types…

* Owing to Open Borders Perpetual Mass Third World Imminvasion and H-1B supplanting of White American workers, massive long-term White unemployment and the concomitant monotonous Megaphonist top-&-bottom-against-the-middle demonization of White Americans seem to be having their desired and intended effects.

Either that, or middle-aged Whites are just obeying Oprah’s exhortation to their old White Racist selves to just “hurry up and die.”

* This must be the “demographic pruning” that Oprah spoke of a few years ago.

* I think this is an artifact of the demographic changing (for people 45-54) that didn’t go to college. In 1999, this included people born in 1945. In 2013, it included people born in 1968.

People that go to college tend to be smarter. Smarter people have lower death rates. We’re probably seeing a change because more people are going to college. Those that don’t go to college aren’t as smart, and the death rate goes up.

In 1967 (1945+22), it wasn’t that big a deal to not have a college degree. In 1990 (1968+22) it was.

* You wonder if that’s a consequence of whites having better healthcare – people are often first exposed to such drugs for legitimate medical reasons. I’ve never used illegal narcotics, but my exposure to hydrocodone, supposedly fairly mild as prescription painkillers go, was enough to convince me of the lure of addiction. Whites with decent health insurance would be able to come up with enough excuses to be prescribed these often enough to start an addiction.

Another factor is that whites tend to have higher expectations of themselves than blacks or Hispanics do. If you’re black or Hispanic you be a mooch for the whole of your life. Expectations are low, and you’ve got plenty of company. Whites who manage not to succeed must feel pretty lonely, by comparison.

Another contributing factor must be the increase in divorce rates, and the rising number of people who reach middle age having never married at all. People are increasingly unwilling to remained hitched to a spouse who has fallen on hard times. Those who reach middle age unmarried must look around and find themselves at something of a dead end. Same goes with those who reach middle age and find themselves professionally unfulfilled.

And finally, the people at or near the bottom are those who benefit most from a “system” – a set of rules to follow that lead to greatest happiness. For the last 40-50 that system has been mocked, undermined, and destroyed. it is gone. There are no rules to follow to attain happiness. You find it on your own, or you don’t.

* Some possible factors for rising white mortality:

Easier access to hard core drugs thanks to increased Asian and Hispanic Immigration and travel (in my part of the world most Class A drugs come from China).

Increasing drug and alcohol use among females

Rural economic stagnation

Widening economic gap between rich and poor whites

White getting increasingly stressed out about economic problems, particularly paying mortgages and farm and business loans (white male farmers are among the most most likely people to commit suicide).

* The problem with the libertarian-style idea of letting these poor whites pass into oblivion because of their bad choices seems not only cruel but a little muddle-headed. Poor whites are the most openly antagonized group in the modern paradigm; the fact that as a group they are failing unto death is not an instance of meritocracy in action. People who can observe the failure of low class whites without any sense of horror are probably following their libertarian principles to the point of absurdity. (Libertarians, why weren’t low class whites failing so spectacularly in the 1950s, for example?)
Noblesse oblige, on the other hand, is a beautiful bit of humanity. Properly, noblesse oblige is not ordered to sustaining the lower classes as parasites forever living off of the higher classes. Rather, I think it is meant to give the low classes the best conditions for whatever limited kind of success they can achieve. Noblesse oblige, the high-minded guidance of the lower classes for the sake of the nation’s common good, is the debt that the innately gifted owe to the nation’s common blood.

* As marijuana becomes more accepted and legal, cartels are pushing heroin instead. Let’s say you’re a regular marijuana user. You go to your dealer and find he has no pot for sale. What do you do? You want a drug. You really really want a drug, but don’t know anyone else who sells. So you buy the heroin anyway even though you know all the warnings. Most drugs users, from pot to heroin or whatever, have the same mentality. If they don’t get their drug, they absolutely have got to substitute another.

I look upon this in a purely Darwinian fashion. People with addictive genes are simply being removed from the white gene pool. This benefits the remaining white society in general. My only regret is that blacks and Mexicans aren’t being culled so quickly as. Heroin use hasn’t really entered these populations to the same extent, but I have no doubt we’ll soon be seeing it hammer these populations hard in the next decade much like crack did the black population back in the 80s. If you thought gang violence was bad in the 80s, just wait until the black and Mexican heroin dealers start fighting over territory in 2016-2026. For all we know, the killing spiral in Baltimore may be a sign that it’s already starting.

* Those of European ancestry are genetically disposed to be empathetic towards a larger community, and have a high level of conscientiousness; things that leave them more prone to suicide and desultory living in the presence of the current propaganda campaign.

* Believe me, I know how they feel, those sick, pissed-off, disappointed, invisible, exploited, forgotten white Americans..

…as my health insurance deductible skyrockets to pay for black and brown parasites, just when I enter the age when I will need it most.

We don’t matter anymore.

This is why I am just maintaining the best life I can for my wife and myself until we die.

This is why I am glad we had no children, who would only suffer further degradation in a declining world.

To those unlucky people who will live in the future: Enjoy your dirty brown planet. I am glad I won’t be here with you.

Anyone who thinks this comment is extreme doesn’t have the frontal lobes to see what’s coming, or the good taste to see what has already disappeared.

* It’s amazing to me how few Americans understand the Social Security system. One of the greatest benefits from SS is the “spousal benefit.” A stay-at-home mom can earn 50% of her husband’s SS benefit because in the 1930s they recognized “housework” as a valuable contribution to society. Americans in that era got tired of seeing little old ladies living out their final years in poverty as widows. Many of today’s “working moms” will not earn a significantly larger SS benefit than they would have received as a spousal benefit, yet they pay all these payroll taxes, income taxes, commuting expenses, day care, fast food, industrial-processed groceries and have too many meals from a red-and-white-striped bucket. No wonder they are drinking themselves to death. That second paycheck isn’t free, in fact, for most families the second income is probably negative over the lifetime of the couple.

* Few if any commenters here or at the NY Times mentioned the negative — and often dramatic — changes that mass immigration has brought to our communities.

Thirty years ago my suburban town was made up mostly of people like me, young white adults striving to raise a family in a good atmosphere. The schools were great and there was a real sense of community. I felt I belonged; most importantly, I felt like I had “made it.”

Today, I go to the grocery store or to a restaurant and I’m alone, surrounded by foreigners who look, talk and act completely different from me. There are few young white couples with children; my generation of whites was the last to see this place as “home.”

We have literally been replaced. And we are supposed to be happy about it, because diversity.

* So a race of people can be demoralized by decades (not even centuries) of all-encompassing negative publicity, to the point where they, collectively start making awful and self-hating decisions?

Posted in America, Whites | Comments Off on Whites In Decline