Germany Abolishes Itself

Posted on July 12, 2017 by Luke Ford

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* There are no “Europeans” in Europe. There are Germans, French, English, Italians, Hungarians, Irish, Scots, Welsh, Dutch and the like.

There are only Europeans in the United Sates, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and wherever else European Christians have explored, settled and colonized.

There are people in the United States who have English, Scottish, Irish, Welsh, German, French, Italian, Dutch and Hungarian ancestors. They are part of the European Christian ancestral core of the United States. They are White Core Americans.

* Helmut Schmidt, former chancellor of Germany, opposed this view, and he did it more openly, the longer he lived. In an interview with the German magazine Focus, he said in 2005: “We have to stop immigration from strange cultures.” (6th of June, 2005).
“He who wants to increase the number of Muslims in Germany, risks to endanger our inner peace.” (In his autobiography Außer Dienst (=Out of Office), p. 236, 2008

Schmidt defended the most important (and best) German critic of Merkel’s immigration policy, ex-Banker and ex-politician turned writer Thilo Tarrazin. Sarrazin holds, that Merkel’s open borders politics make for the biggest mistake in German history – since 1945, ok.

The one point, Schmidt did not agree with Sarrazin, was the HBD-aspect in Sarrazin’s books. Sarrazin is well read, and knows the literature – not only that of Murray/Herrnstein, but that of German psychologist and IQ expert Heiner Rindermann as well (who, as it turns out, thinks, that Steve Sailer is a great science-journalist).

* “Instead, we now celebrate the anti-logic of leapfrogging loyalties.

The Western liberal is noteworthy for feeling loyalty toward his inner circle, then leapfrogging over a whole bunch of folks who are kind of like him but whom he more or less despises, in order to embrace The Other.”

This is NOT a recent phenomenon. It was not birthed with Modern Socialism, and neither is it a unique sense of guilt for 2 World Wars gone wild. The English in the 18th century, for example, saw the Celts they ruled as inherently inferior savages, at the same time they were beginning the process of creating the Numinous Negro that the British Empire would spread globally. The Anglo-Saxon Puritans had hoped to exterminate all Catholics and Celts, culturally if not necessarily physically, while simultaneously cooing over Jews and granting them special status.

And it is not merely a WASP problem. It is a Germanic thing. The Continental Germans have always seen Slavs as sub-human or at least as fit only to be serfs. The Nazis used the same term for Slavs (untermenschen) that they used for Jews, and Germans of various specific ‘political’ stances had used it for Slavs for centuries, long before the Nazis used it for Jews as well. The Germanies produced various writers who romanticized peoples like Turks and other Mohammedans even as they invariably assumed the Slavs to be hopelessly inferior and all Romance speakers to be EVIL of the type that thought only of harming poor innocent Germans.

What Sailer describes is inherent in Germanic culture (for those who may not know, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, and Frisians were Germanic tribes – WASP culture is Germanic, as surely as Yiddish is German).

* Logic of Imperialism: Nationalism is good when it can be used against the rival empire, real or imagined. Nationalism is bad when it resists one’s own empire or is supported by the rival empire.

So, during WWI, the British Imperialists supported Arab nationalism against the Turks. But once the British gained power over the Muslim world, they no longer liked Arab nationalism. Nasser was one of the most hated man.

We see the schizo mindset of the US in Poland and Ukraine. During the Cold War, Polish nationalism was given moral support against the Soviet empire. And even after the Cold War, US fully supported Polish nationalist animus against Russia. However, at the same time, the US tried to weaken Polish resistance to US globalist-imperialism with homo agenda and open borders. Schizo.

Same with Ukraine. US even aided neo-nazis to topple Russia-friendly regime. Ukrainian nationalism, even the most far-right kind, has been a gold mine against Russia. At the same time, US pushes homo agenda on Ukraine to break its resistance to globalist hegemony.

“We encourage your nationalism against the other empire while at the same time weakening its resistance to our empire.”

* Leapfrogging amplifies self-righteous virtue-vanity while decreasing burden of responsibility.

If you focus on your own kids, you gotta feed them, clothe them, educate them. You can’t make grand moral claims about humanity, but you got a real burden and obligation.

But if you neglect your kids and say you love all the children of the world, you can overlook the responsibility to your kids while promoting yourself as someone who CARES so much. Pro-Bono.

So, when elites say they care about all of humanity, they can dodge and neglect real responsibilities to own nations while thumping their chests about humanity.

Globalism ‘ennobles’ by giving license to unload one’s personal/national burden.

“Why aren’t you taking care of your kids?”

“I’m too busy singing songs about the children of the world.”

Do less but claim more.

Posted in Germany | Comments Off on Germany Abolishes Itself

Steve Sailer: ‘How Much Black Lives Matter Terrorism Has There Been Since Ferguson?’

Posted on July 12, 2017 by Luke Ford

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* I applaud your effort here but it won’t amount to much. The (((media))) pushed the narrative that innocent blacks were being systematically hunted down in the streets en masse by white police forces. Blacks and MSNBC watching whites actually believe there is a massive Wounded Knee massacre going on in the country every day. These people are too uninformed, and the meme is just too convenient. They will cling to this myth forever, like other racial victim myths of the past.

Any amount of bad behavior on the part of these Neo Wounded Knee victims will be justified as legitimate resistance. Facts don’t matter, and civil war is coming.

* The Black Lives Matter Mob(BLMM) can be pacified very easily. It is the corporate propaganda apparatus, or the corporate media, that pushes the anti-White propaganda that riles up the BLMM to no end. Are the BLMM puppets terrorists? Yes they are. Has the Black Lives Matter Mob set out to terrorize Whites? Yes they have. But the real evil is done by the corporate media which creates an atmosphere of anti-White propaganda.

The corporate media is the evil which must be destroyed to allow truth to prosper in regards to the Black Lives Matter Mob and other things. I do not recall that there are too many Blacks among the few who control the anti-White propaganda in the United States. Oprah? OK.
Blacks do not control Comcast or NBC, for example. Who does control NBC? Who are the Roberts family?

Who controls CBS? Who are the Redstones?

White Core Americans must not allow anti-White elements in the corporate media to continue to push anti-White propaganda. It is time to begin dislodging from power the corporate media megaphone which creates the atmosphere in which the Black Lives Matter Mob thrives. The owners of the corporate media are a bigger threat to White Core Americans than the low IQ boobs in the Black Lives Matter Mob.

Posted in Blacks, BLM | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: ‘How Much Black Lives Matter Terrorism Has There Been Since Ferguson?’

Recovery

Posted on July 12, 2017 by Luke Ford

When I collapsed into six years of largely bedridden Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) between 21-27 (1988-1994), my peers fled from me (while most people in the second half displayed considerable empathy towards me). I gradually realized that fear of illness was not personal. Most people instinctively retreat from illness. It is probably an evolutionary adaptation. It might be why so few people wanted to show up to Hillary Clinton’s rallies.

After I rejoined the working world in 1994, I kept under-achieving. Another way of describing it would be hiding and biting. Just like wounded animals hide in case they get hurt again, so too I hid in my own ways, and when people tried to bring me into the sun, I bit them.

In my late 20s, I kinda sorta belonged in the same social circles as my friends, but into my 30s, as they married, advanced in their careers, and had children and mortgages, we increasingly went our separate ways. Sometimes I simply couldn’t afford to do the things my friends were doing. Circa 1997, I remember meeting this attractive woman in shul and she called me up and invited me to dinner with her friends and I had to say no because I couldn’t afford it.

People who move ahead with their lives don’t generally want to hang around with people who are hiders and biters. This social dynamic begins before kindergarten. Winners don’t want to hang out with losers. The more friends you make who are losers, the more you get sucked into losing. The more friends you make who are winners, the more you win. In school through college, I was in the middle of the social pecking order. As I started getting my act together in college, I began moving up (until I was felled by CFS).

When I began 12-step work in 2011, I talked a lot about my problems. A little later, I began talking about working on my problems and my character defects. When I moved into some serious recovery in 2016, I stopped talking about my problems, stopped thinking about my problems, and surrendered to the fact that I had these powerful compulsions that were keep me small and unhappy. Instead of worrying about my problems, I worked my various 12-step programs, turned my problems and character defects over to God, walked in the paths of the 12 Steps and 12 Traditions, and as I did so, my problems diminished and sometimes disappeared. Now I rarely worry about my problems. I just treat the friction of life as reminders to work my programs.

I find it hard to hang around people with untreated addictions. I’m willing to help but I have to keep such dangerous people at a distance or they will pull me down. Even under-earning and under-achieving can be an addiction and when I spot that type of thinking, I want to flee. Such people tend to be careless about time and money and their responsibilities. They’re dangerous and often disconnected from others, from themselves and from God.

I get a sense of a person’s recovery by how they carry themselves. When I first entered a 12-step program about money in May of 2015 (with about $50,000 in credit card debt and nothing saved for retirement), my therapist noticed an immediate change in the way I walked, talked and thought because I suddenly saw a very clear path ahead towards prosperity.

People who are sunk in their addictions are usually sunk in their bodies. Their defeat radiates and infects. Nothing we do fails to affect other people. Such folks are universally slumped and distorted by unnecessary tension patterns. They’re pulled down and in. By contrast, as they get recovery, they become increasingly buoyant.

I think I can tell how a person speaks to himself by the way he’s aligned. I remember there were years (1997 to 2008) when the most common thing I said to myself was, “I’m f***ed.” Accompanying that self-talk was a punitive tightening and pulling down and in on myself. Happy people, on the other hand, are up and out directed, both in their physiology and in their social lives. It is useless to tell the depressed to care about others. It is impossible. When we are happy, we naturally orient towards others and it is a joy to be of service. It makes us feel alive.

Posted in Addiction, Alexander Technique | Comments Off on Recovery

I Don’t Get It

Posted on July 11, 2017 by Luke Ford

If a foreigner, be they Russian or Chinese or Saudi Arabian, offered to help me by hurting my enemy, I’d be happy to meet with them. I’d be happy to meet with Stalin to beat Hitler. America partnered with the Soviet Union to win WWII. That’s how life works. You often make partnerships with unpalatable people. I’ve earned money from people I didn’t like. As a reporter, I would routinely seek information from people I didn’t like.

If I were on Hillary’s team and some Russians or Iranians or Chinese told me that they wanted to swing the election in my favor and wanted to give me damaging information about Donald Trump, I would meet with them if they seemed credible.

Donald Trump Jr. did nothing wrong. He did nothing that any other sane person in his place would not have done.

I’m rewatching Game of Thrones. It’s an Alt Right show. Do you think the contenders in Game of Thrones would not stoop to talk to enemies if they thought it could give them an advantage? What about on House of Cards?

When you play the game of thrones, you win or you die. There is no middle ground.

I would prefer that my team play by the rules and be nice, but that is not as important to me, generally speaking, as winning. I want my people to win. I want my people to live. All other considerations pale in significance to that.

The most ridiculous part of the Trump-Russia story is that Israel wields far more political power in America than does Israel. Do the media really want to investigate that? How come it is kosher for Israel to influence American politics but it is illegitimate for Russia to have one-tenth of that pull?

If the situation was reversed and there were the same type of allegations that Hillary was president because of the influence of a foreign power, do you think the MSM would be as interested in that story?

I no longer care for democracy. I want my people to live. When democracy is an impediment to that, I don’t want democracy. I want aristocracy. I want an alternative.

New York times: “Donald Trump Jr. was looking for dirt on rivals, a typical part of modern campaigns. But information is not usually harvested from, say, Russia.”

Right. It should come from some place like China or Israel or Saudi Arabia. So much better.

A friend says:

I think this stems from two sources: (1) the Trump opponents need to delegitimize him and so are willing to do whatever is necessary to keep the narrative alive that he didn’t win the election, but that the Russians hacked it and without their aid he would have been defeated. This is needed to placate the Democratic base and to a certain extent its funders and (2) the media recognizes that Trump actually poses an existential threat. Trump’s quest to gain the Republican nomination and then win the presidency exploited the press’s need for viewers and readers by feeding them non-stop controversy. He also campaigned over and around the press through rallies and social media. Once he was elected, the press tried to rein him in and to reassert its power through its gatekeeper function, but during the election the press destroyed its own credibility to the point where more persons believe Trump than CNN. The traditional sources of news-weekly newsmagazines, daily newspapers, daily television broadcasts- have all been dying. I find it funny that the NYT bragged about how Trump’s election and subsequent attacks on the NYT actually led to more subscribers, yet the Times just let go a number of editors, including copy editors and has pared its news staff. So even if circulation is up (and my suspicion it was at most a temporary and insignificant bump) advertisers are still fleeing the big city dailies, witness the incredibly shrinking Los Angeles Times which has a monopoly in Los Angeles. The press, especially print media is in trouble anyway. The NYT is afloat only because of its sugar daddy, Carlos Slim, who of course has not influenced the editorial policy of the paper at all. Wapo will survive for a long time because it is a vanity project for Jeff Bezos, just as the WSJ will survive because of Rupert Murdoch (although after he dies, who knows) but the rest of the papers are on their way out, and this trend would continue regardless of who is president. However, Trump has added onto the other woes the body blow of attacking their veracity, accuracy and credibility, with at least some success.

The only way the mainstream, legacy press can recover some of its luster, is to BRING TRUMP DOWN. And that is what is motivating the stories about Russia and keeping the pressure on Trump.

Posted in America | Comments Off on I Don’t Get It

What Is A ‘Bogan’?

Posted on July 9, 2017 by Luke Ford

Who’s behind Urban Dictionary? Aaron Peckham. Jewish?

Urban Dictionary:

A fascinating beast. The majority of the species are hideously repugnant and unintelligent, and yet they manage to breed in ever-increasing numbers and populate an area known as the outer west. It is quite common to find five or six offspring in each family group, often with a different father for each new baby.
Their habitat consists of a weatherboard or brick-veneer dwelling and is characterised by an early-model Holden or Ford in the driveway surrounded by a group of males discussing why the carby is stuffed and the results of last night’s footy (a primitive gladiator-like spectator sport enjoyed by most bogans).
The female of the species, while smaller in stature, is far more loud and aggressive than the male. While the males tend to be very friendly and congregate with other males, the females spend most of their time in supermarkets and shopping malls, using a shrill high-pitched call to discipline their children and contact other females.
Males and females rarely interact socially except during breeding season, which is otherwise known as Friday night. During this time, females are allowed to enter the male-dominated area known as “the pub” and display their impressive coloured plumage to a prospective mate.
Herein lies an interesting phenomenon. Males will often fight over a particularly attractive female and she will mate with only one male, while some less attractive females have been known to have several partners simultaneously.

Posted in Australia | Comments Off on What Is A ‘Bogan’?