‘Who’s Going To Fund The Real Reporting?’

Nick Gillespie writes on Reason.com:

Few political journalists command as much respect, admiration, and recognition among their peers as Jonathan Rauch, a senior writer and columnist for National Journal magazine in Washington, a correspondent for The Atlantic Monthly, and a regular presence at Reason Online. Born in Phoenix in 1960, he is the author of a string of highly praised and provocative books including Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good for Gays, Good for Straights, and Good for America (2004), Demosclerosis: The Silent Killer of American Government (1994), and Kindly Inquisitors: The New Attacks on Free Thought (1993).

In 2005, Rauch took home a National Magazine Award, the industry’s highest honor, for his National Journal column, "Social Studies." His writings, reads the prize commendation, are "reasoned, heartfelt and persuasive even at their most contrarian, they bring Washington’s policy debates to life."

Such compliments grossly understate not only the value of Rauch’s analysis but the punch of his prose.

Why is Jonathan Rauch regarded as so smart? He exhibits some of the dumbest, most cliched analysis I’ve ever read about journalism.

His primary economic question is: "Who’s going to fund the real reporting?"

Well, who’s going to fund the real orange juice? Who’s going to fund the real cars? Who’s going to fund the real rock ‘n’ roll?

I’m not as accomplished as Jonathan Rauch, but I think I know the answer to all these questions, including the journalism one: The free market will fund reporting/rock/OJ as long as there is a demand for it. There will always be a demand for reporting and the free market will always fill it.

In fact, even if journalism was unpaid, there would still be a ton of it because the non-monetary rewards of doing it are so large — including fame, prestige, and the feeling of making the world a better place by giving people better information.

There’s no barrier to entry to reporting. Anybody can get into it and anybody with valuable information or analysis that has not been previously published can make a valuable contribution to reporting, whether they do it via fax/internet/Washington Post/church bulletin.

Rauch says: "I’m not liking the fact that foreign bureaus are being closed left and right and I’m also not particularly liking the fact that it seems to be that that for a lot of young journalists the model is to get past reporting and into commentary as fast as your feet will take you."

All Rauch is doing here is crying about reality. It’s no more profound than the fat unemployed 58-year-old moron at the bar who whines he don’t get that young pussy no more. If a profit-seeking newspaper or TV network closes a bureau in Baghdad or Bangladesh or Beirut, that simply means there is insufficient demand for the product that that bureau is producing. In the age of the internet, there will be no lack of easily accessible reporting from any of those cities.

I come from Australia. I have a particular curiosity about what is happening down under, particularly with the cricket. Yet you don’t see me whining that The Los Angeles Times doesn’t have a cricket reporter or insufficient bureaus in Australia. Thank God my choices for information are not limited to The L.A. Times.

America is not a poorer country because The L.A. Times does not have a bureau in some stinking third-world country.

Investigative journalism is not some mysterious special skill equivalent to brain surgery. Think about all the biggest scoops of the past 30 years — be it Watergate or the NSA wiretapping — and almost all those stories were given to these hallowed investigative reporters. The difference between a great investigative reporter and a dunderheaded reporter is that the great reporter finds ways to get people to give him scoops and then he evaluates the information and transmits it clearly.

Gillespie asks some lame questions but the lamest of all was this: "Do you think politics–or maybe just political discourse, which is a slightly different thing–are too extreme right now, too fragmented and divisive?"

Only a wuss worries about politics being too divisive. Real men love a good fight. And real men ask questions of gay-marriage supporters such as: "Do you think it should be legal to have sex with dogs/brothers/mothers?"

Libertarians are jolly lucky that they’ve got me around to sort them out.

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on ‘Who’s Going To Fund The Real Reporting?’

Shalhevet Financially Stretched

Sarah emails about the Modern Orthodox Los Angeles school:

I get the sense that the conflict between opposing forces (Friedman and the people who are sick of him) is unresolved, and that it will countinue to play out over time in the personnel decisions, i.e. who is let go and who comes in. Will they make good decisions in a conflicted environment? They don’t seem to have done so even before. They have not picked up such great people from other schools, in my opinion, one very negative person in particular who I can’t understand why they would allow themselves to be associated with. Meanwhile, the school is very financially stretched. Not a pretty picture. On a separate note, time will also tell whether they made a mistake in expanding to pre-K through 12. They put themselves in direct competition with the schools that should be their feeders. Will people who opt against Shalhevet for pre-K and elementary come back for high school? They certainly won’t be getting encouragement from the elementary/middle schools. It will be interesting to see how their recruitment goes, because it seems like they have now made themselves dependent upon their success is early education recruiting, which is a competitive area that every school is focused on.

Posted in Education, Orthodoxy, Shalhevet | Comments Off on Shalhevet Financially Stretched

Sleeping With Luke Ford

A shocking new video reveals all.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on Sleeping With Luke Ford

‘I Believe In You’

In the holy Pico-Robertson neighborhood this week, I saw a friend who hadn’t given me any gossip in a couple of weeks.
I tapped him on the shoulder, gazed into his eyes, and announced, "I believe in you!"
He gave me a strange look.
Such Orthodox Jews are not as generous with their lashon hara as they should be.

Posted in Orthodoxy | Comments Off on ‘I Believe In You’

Blessing The New Moon

There’s a freakin’ blessing in Judaism for everything but blowjobs. Saturday night I fled shul after havdalah, skipping the obligatory blessing for the new moon jazz.
"Why did you leave?" asked a friend.
"Because I’ve done enough Jewish stuff today."
"Ehhh!" he replied. "Wrong answer!"
He proceeded to give me some complicated Chabad interpretation for why tonight is not the right night.

Posted in Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Blessing The New Moon

Why Do I Find Nextbook/Jewish Journal/Susan Freudenheim So Boring?

Nextbook is a generously funded non-profit purportedly devoted to Jewish intellectual life.

According to the April 20 Jewish Journal:

First to arrive was the Nextbook Web site, a compendium of the best new Jewish-themed writing on the Internet that is supplemented by original essays commissioned by Nextbook’s editorial staff. Newsweek recently described Nextbook’s site as a cross between Slate, the New York Review of Books and online intellectual clearinghouse Arts & Letters Daily, combining links to Jewish content around the Web with New Yorker-esque essays and personal material.

Are we talking about nextbook.org? I’ve checked it out many times, hearing that it is good, but there’s almost no compelling content on that site aside from the odd Shalom Auslander column.

Nextbook is throwing a "festival of ideas" at UCLA April 22 but I can’t find anything on the agenda that would justify my time. I can’t imagine anybody leading a Jewish life would have the slightest interest in anything on the agenda, including the views of the loathsome David Mamet who is "in conversation" with the Jewish Journal’s tiresome columnist Tommy Teicholz.

This Nextbook festival is Jewish to the extent that its featured speakers are born of a Jewish mother but there appears to be nothing Judaic (nothing Jewishly intellectual) on the agenda, just pointless discussion by Jewish goyim of the sensitivities and neuroses of other Jewish goyim.

I’m sure I am missing something here so perhaps you, dear reader, could add something in comments about why Adam Gopnik (he married a shiksa) on the history of Jewish comedy is just so compelling.

Incidentally, has Jewish Journal managing editor Susan Freudenheim ever written anything remotely interesting? If so, I’ve missed it. Every time I have forced myself through one of her banal pieces, I’ve regretted it.

To complete my out-to-lunch blog entry, I need to know why anybody cares about 110 years of the Forward in pictures. Alana Newhouse is delicious but who would spend $20 to hear her talk? For that much money, I’d want her to do a lot more than just talk. Sheesh, for one Alana Newhouse presentation, I could get four Rav Adlerstein shiurim.

I’m probably wrong, but I suspect that anybody busy leading a Jewish life has little interest in these folkways of Jewish goyim.

Joe writes: "I agree that there is something toothless in their culturally Jewish (if that) crowd of invitees. I suspect that any treatment of Jewish topics will be shallow. But I am still in favor of any program that causes non-religious LA Jews to think about their Jewishness in any way. It it self-evident that religious Judaism (Orthodox and the liberal movements) is not engaging roughly half of the Jews out there, so we need to try something, anything, to keep alive any spark of Jewishness, and NextBook seems like an effort to do that."

Posted in Nextbook | Comments Off on Why Do I Find Nextbook/Jewish Journal/Susan Freudenheim So Boring?

New Jewish Journal Hire Brad E. Greenberg

I sent Greenberg two emails this week (which I found out later he never received, thereby invalidating this blog post). The first let him know that the Forward was not the largest Jewish newspaper in New York as he had written on his God blog, that the The Jewish Week and The Jewish Press had larger circulations. The second let him know that he incorrectly used the word "refute" when the proper word was "rebutt."

He neither acknowledged my emails nor made corrections.

In this respect, he’s exactly like me, mates. Whether blogging about Jews, porners, Australian fauna, my mental health, my dad Desmond, and myriad topics, I’ve never been one to rigorously check my facts before posting. And I’ve misused the English language quite regularly. The speed of the Internet doesn’t allow for fact checking or being clear when I write. I’m a blogger, mates, and I play by own rules.

And, by the way, I know I misspelled "rebut." I used two "Ts" because I’m gay and fixated on such things.

According to his blog: "Brad A. Greenberg is a God-fearing Christian with devilishly good Jewish looks."

Posted in Jewish Journal | Comments Off on New Jewish Journal Hire Brad E. Greenberg

31 Murdered

Dennis Prager writes April 16:

I see on all the networks "32 dead." It should read "31 murdered." I do not know when exactly this notion of counting murderers along with their victims began, but it is a moral travesty. No news organization would have imagined giving the number of dead at Pearl Harbor so as to include Japanese pilots shot down. But in our age of moral neutrality, all dead are given equal weight — the terrorist along with his victims; the shooter along with the students. Why is the Virginia Tech murderer always referred to as the "gunman" and not the "murderer"? Had he stabbed a dozen students to death, would he be the "knifeman"? And why is it always referred to as a "tragedy"? Virginia Tech wasn’t hit by a cyclone. That would be a tragedy. This was evil.

Posted in Evil | Comments Off on 31 Murdered

An Obsession With Ethics

I fell in love with Judaism because Dennis Prager and Joseph Telushkin presented it to me (through their writings and lectures and media appearances) as a step-by-step system for making a better world.

They said Judaism embodied ethical monotheism — the belief that there is one God whose primary demand of people is ethical behavior.

Dennis and Joseph complain that ritual observance, rather than ethical behavior, has become the measure of a Jew’s religiosity. If a Jew keeps the Sabbath and the kosher laws, then he is religious, even if he cheats in business.

I still love Dennis and Joseph and ethical monotheism but my views on these topics have become more nuanced.

For one thing, the primary reason that ritual observance is usually taken as the measure of religiosity is because ritual observance is easily measured while ethical behavior is not.

In my first few years of Judaic obsession, I thought one could sort through one’s life for unethical behavior and systematically root it out.

While this approach may work to varying degrees with various people, the perpetuation of goodness requires much more, including community.

Ethics are not enough to hold a group together. Rituals bind people together. For instance, Orthodox shuls tend to be much tighter knit because Orthodox Jews are not allowed to drive on the Sabbath (and festivals) and thus must live within walking distance of the shul (and each other).

Frequently, there’s nothing in common between what looks right and what does right.

For instance, in the summer of 1995, I wanted to write a book on how to be a good person (based upon Dennis Prager’s teachings). When Prager asked me to hold off on that project, I decided to write a history of porn instead.

That would seem to be major demerits to me.

But in the course of researching my book, I exposed somebody who was transmitting HIV to a lot of people (and other stories of similar importance). For those who I saved from HIV, it’s a good thing I devoted my skills to investigating porn rather than goodness.

I’m reading Rabbi Telushkin’s new book A Code of Jewish Ethics: Volume 1: You Shall Be Holy in the light of a clash (Rabbi Telushkin and company made a scorched earth attack on those of us who’d reported accurately on the predatory behavior of Rabbi Marc Gafni) we had a couple of years ago.

Based on his public statements (or lack of them), Telushkin has learned nothing from his prodigious efforts on behalf of a sexual predator (Rabbi Gafni carried Telushkin’s letter with him in a briefcase wherever he went).

In a prominent letter Rabbi Telushkin (along with Saul Berman, Dr. Stephen Marmer and ) sent out in early January 2005, he wrote: “Luke Ford is a discredited malicious gossip columnist for the pornography industry.”

Hmm. In 2003, when 60 Minutes sought out a critic of the porn industry, they did not turn to Rabbi Telushkin or any clergy. They turned to me.

When Beth Jacob’s Rabbi Steven Weil was asked about my report on Aaron Biston’s claim that Rabbi Weil slapped him and cursed him in front of his daughter in the process of throwing Biston out of shul, Rabbi Weil’s response was that I was a pornographer.

I’m not arguing that that is an unethical response. A good argument can be made that that is the best response.

I’m reading chapter five of Rabbi Telushkin’s book about judging people fairly. He trots out the familiar injunctions about judging with empathy.

I studied these same texts with religious Jews for years and I don’t know if our study made any difference in our behavior. When I was kicked out of a shul, nobody (with a couple of exceptions) made any effort to get my side of things (or even to stay in touch — I’m not arguing that they should’ve acted differently, I am just observing about the facts on the ground).

“Jews invented shunning,” says my pornographer friend James DiGiorgio.

I’m not arguing that Jews or anybody shouldn’t shun gross sinners such as myself. I am simply musing on Judaic admonitions to judge with empathy and how such admonitions are carried out (if at all).

I’m thinking about what happened to Rabbi Juda Mintz. His shul computer was found to have two pictures of child pornography on it. I suspect he did not even seek out such material. Just in the course of cruising the web looking for porn, he accumulated those two criminal pics on his harddrive. For that sin (there’s no evidence he harmed any child or ever acted like a predator on anybody), he lost almost all his friends and family.

You can have all the pious admonitions you want about judging people with empathy, and I don’t think the very persons who study such admonitions and pay lip service to them will act any differently (when the sinner they are called upon to judge is now judged by their peers to be outside their community).

A lot of people who led pious lives by going to seminary and embracing a heavily religious lifestyle would probably have done far more good in the world if they had pursued money and fame instead (by creating valuable products and services and paying taxes on their earnings).

Some of us are so screwed up that when we take on a lofty cause such as ethical monotheism, we only bring disrepute to it, no matter how hard we study the sacred texts and try to implement them.

Posted in Ethics | Comments Off on An Obsession With Ethics

Anglo-Jewish Literature Raises Its Voice

Professor Donald Weber writes on JBooks.com:

Feeling uprooted in London almost 20 years ago, [Philip] Roth himself spoke harshly of his experience as a de-territorialized‚ Jewish writer-intellectual living half of each year in England. As he explained in a 1988 interview, in conjunction with the publication of his autobiography, The Facts, a what’s driving [British] society isn’t dramatized with anything like the turbulent intensity that animates America… the intensity that’s generated by the American historical drama of movement and massive displacement, of class overspreading class, region overtaking region, minority encroaching on minority. Startlingly, just a few years later, the emergence of a vibrant cosmopolitan landscape whose center is multicultural London belies Roth’s premature judgment. Indeed, contemporary Britain now hums with a rich aural mix: an array of diverse voices, conjured by writers who take the vexed, yet often comic, story of global migration and new-world adjustment as their subject.

Posted in Literature | Comments Off on Anglo-Jewish Literature Raises Its Voice