‘I Have Never Forgotten You’

On Tisha B’Av, it is the Jewish way not to greet each other.

As I walked around this Tisha B’Av, I kept asking myself, "How is this day different from all other days?"

In Luke Ford Land, it is always Tisha B’Av.

Museum of Tolerance Sunday afternoon. I stand at the entrance to the second floor theater with a JConnectLA organizer.

A middle-aged woman walks up.

"Do you have a tag?" asks the organizer.

"Hi, let me introduce myself," she says. "I’m Liba Geft, the museum director."

We decide she can go in.

So I’m sitting in the theater talking to a girl I’ve just met and I’m showing off my new Blackberry curve email function and blazened across the middle of my screen is an email from "Seduction Chronicles" with the subject line, "How to kiss like a movie star."

How on earth did such worldly material end up in my inbox on Tisha B’Av?

The documentary is first-rate like everything done by the MOT. Who knew that an Orthodox rabbi (Marvin Hier) would be such a superb movie producer.

A friend of mine Netflixed the movie a couple of weeks ago, but she decided to come along to today’s event because it was advertised as including a "VIP tour of new Museum exhibit."

That exhibit turned out to be a undramatic recreation of Simon Weisenthal’s office, which looks just like 10,000 other untidy offices around the world.

BTW, if you want to kiss like a movie star, David Van Arrick — I’ve never heard of him, honest — advises:

Look her deeply in the eyes, allow your hands to slowly
but gently touch the side of her cheek you can use one
or both hands.

I find for first kisses the two hand approach works much
better. Cup the back of her head or contour her jaw line
with the palm of your hand.

Your thumb can rest either just in front of the ear or
on the cheekbone just below her eye or any point in
between. While maintaining eye contact, gently draw her
lips to yours. Allow your eyes to close as your lips
gently touch.

That’s the quick lesson.

For First kisses, I always use my palms to face technique.

Why?

Because It Just Plain Works More Reliably Powerfully and
Consistently Than Any Other Method of First Kissing I Have
Tried!

I discovered many years ago that when you really want to
get a woman’s romantic desires clicked into over drive
the fastest way to do it is by touching her anywhere on
her face while your kissing her.

Posted in JConnect LA | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on ‘I Have Never Forgotten You’

More Questions For John Edwards

Mickey Kaus writes:

Sam Stein has emails that already reveal one seemingly false assertion in Edwards’ Modified Limited New Story–namely his claim that his "short" affair with Hunter didn’t begin until after she began work as a campaign filmmaker in mid-2006:

Edwards and Hunter initially met each other sometime during the winter of 2006 (either late December 2005 or early January) in a hotel restaurant in midtown Manhattan. It would be another seven months before Edwards would first pay her for the documentary work. As Woodruff rightfully noted, the initial check cut to Hunter’s film company was written on July 5, 2006, for the cost of $12,500.

What happened in between that winter meeting and the start of filming? Emails sent by Hunter suggest that her romance with Edwards was in full bloom that spring. In early April, Hunter wrote about a trip she had taken to North Carolina to see the man whom she affectionately referred to as "my love lips."

A week later she wrote another email in which she described the mental anguish of "being in love with a (still somewhat dysfunctional) married man."

Rather than Edwards having a fling with a staffer, Stein speculates, "Edwards hired her as a front to continue their relationship." … But it’s not true that Hunter had no filmmaking experience prior to being hired. She was actress, writer and producer for Billy Bob and Them! …

P.S.: Hunter’s lawyer has issued a statement saying she will not "participate in DNA testing" of her daughter. Convenient! No doubt some of Edwards’ rich friends will now send her tens of thousands of dollars behind his back to try to persuade her to agree to the test and clear John’s name (by validating Story #2’s central claim that he is not the father). … Wouldn’t Hunter’s statement seem a little more authentic if it wasn’t PR’ed to an inch of its life to mesh with the Edwards anti-tab talking points? ("Rielle is a private individual. She is not running for public office.")

P.P.S.: According to WaPo, Enquirer editor David Perel explicitly says there were two meetings at the Hilton, not just one. … More to explain!

Posted in Adultery, John Edwards | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on More Questions For John Edwards

If You Were A John Edwards Supporter, You Were A Sucker

Mickey Kaus writes:

Elizabeth Edwards is already up on Kos with a diary attacking "the present voyeurism." … HuffPo‘s Lee Stranahan, a former Edwards supporter, responds "Say It Ain’t So, Elizabeth: You Knew But Let Him Run." Excerpt:

[I]f you’re an Edwards supporter, let me put this bluntly; if you gave John and Elizabeth Edwards time, money, support, or goodwill, they played you.

They made a conscious decision to make their relationship a focus throughout the campaign. That emotional goodwill you feel for them? They not only let you feel, they took actions and made statements specifically so you would feel it.

Then when the rumors first surfaced, they made the worst decision of all; they decided to lie about it and to keep lying about it for months. They lied in a way that made the people who were telling the truth look like the real liars. They lied in a way that turned their supporters into attack dogs. They only started to tell the truth when John Edwards was caught at the Beverly Hills Hilton and even now both John and Elizabeth Edward are callin[g] the people who caught him the liars …

Posted in Adultery, John Edwards | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on If You Were A John Edwards Supporter, You Were A Sucker

Rielle Hunter Rejects Paternity Test

WASHINGTON (AP) — The ex-mistress of former presidential candidate John Edwards said Saturday she will not participate in DNA testing to establish the paternity of her daughter.

Rielle Hunter’s lawyer, Robert Gordon, says his client is a private individual who is not running for public office and that she wishes to maintain the privacy of her and her daughter.

”Rielle is therefore making no statement now or in the future,” Gordon said in a statement. ”Furthermore, Rielle will not participate in DNA testing or any other invasion of her or her daughter’s privacy now or in the future.”

On Friday, Edwards admitted to having an extramarital affair with Hunter in 2006 but denied that he was the father of Hunter’s 5-month-old daughter. Edwards offered to take a paternity test to prove he is not the father.

Hunter’s decision means that the issue of who the father is remains an open question.

Hunter’s daughter, Frances Quinn Hunter, was born on Feb. 27 this year, and no father’s name is given on the birth certificate filed in California.

A former Edwards campaign staff member professes to be the father.

Edwards, a former North Carolina senator who was the Democratic vice presidential nominee in 2004, confessed to ABC News that he had lied repeatedly about the affair with Hunter, then 42, who produced videos for Edwards as he prepared to launch his presidential campaign.

Posted in Rielle Hunter | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Rielle Hunter Rejects Paternity Test

Questions Still To Be Answered About John Edwards Affair

Mickey Kaus writes:

2) Obvious question: Why visit Hunter in the early morning hours if he does "not love her" and is not her child’s father? … But I think the question is actually even more difficult to answer than that. …Look again at the Enquirer’s photo of Edwards holding a baby in front of the Hilton’s telltale drapes. Edwards is wearing a sweaty blue t-shirt. But the Enquirer reported that on the night they ambushed him, he was at least initially wearing a "blue dress shirt." One possible explanation for the discrepancy: he visited her and the baby at the hotel more than once, and the photo is from an earlier visit. … Just speculating! … But if you read the Enquirer‘s accompanying text closely, they don’t say the photo was taken on the same day they ambushed him, only at the same hotel. … If this theory is right, Edwards has even more explaining to do than it initially seems. …

3) Was it smart for Edwards to potentially annoy Rielle Hunter by saying he "did not love her"? Is she going to give her side of the story now? Doesn’t he want her to think favorably of him if she does? Edwards denies paying her money but "saiid it was possible some of his friends or supporters may have made payments without telling him." If so, are these helpful friends continuing their top secret payments?

4) A paternity test seems inevitable, no? [Update: Edwards has volunteered to take one. Make sure it’s not Mudcat Saunders who gets the DNA from the kid.] If Edwards wanted to snake out of this scandal, the cunning way to do it was always to build up press anticipation of a paternity test and then have the test come back negative (after which the press will forget that he still cheated). He may have now lucked on to this strategy by accident. But paternity isn’t the key moral question, it seems to me. It’s whether Edwards treated his wife as honorably as he unsubtly boasted in the campaign (plus his subsequent coverup, and what it involved). Whether Edwards continuted the affair after the recurrence of her illness is one factor in making that judgment (and paternity would be damning evidence in that regard, given the timing). Whether he thought he was the father, and continued seeing Hunter for that reason, is more important than whether he actually turns out to be the father.

5) WIll the MSM, having given Edwards an epic, embarrassing pass, now question the line he has drawn (non-paternity, that the affair only occured during "a short period in 2006," placing it before the recurrence of Elizabeth’s cancer)?** There is now one player in this scandal with far less credibility than the National Enquirer, after all. Edwards may be overestimating the willingness of reporters to roll over for him one more time. ..

6) Edwards claims in his just-released statement that he’s learned, in the context of his dismissal of the Enquirer, that "being 99% honest is no longer enough." 99% honest? Edwards’ rigorous self-inventory of his narcissitic moral failings ("You cannot beat me up more than I have already beaten up myself") may be incomplete.

**–Byron York reported, pre-confession, that the commonly-held idea that MSM organizations were waiting for their own independent reporting to confirm the Enquirer was a myth–there was "not a lot of independent reporting" going on, ABC and Fox excepted:

Instead, some big-time journalists seem to believe the Enquirer has nailed the story, and they are waiting for the tabloid to release the full results of its reporting. In the meantime, they are staying away from the story because it appeared in the Enquirer. In other words, they’re waiting for the Enquirer to fully report a story that they wouldn’t otherwise report… because it’s in the Enquirer.

The question is whether this independent reporting will now commence, or whether editors who never wanted to have to discuss the story will let Edwards’ half-confession go untested.

Posted in Adultery, John Edwards, Journalism, Mickey Kaus | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Questions Still To Be Answered About John Edwards Affair

John Edwards Admits Affair

By RHONDA SCHWARTZ and BRIAN ROSS

August 8, 2008 —

John Edwards repeatedly lied during his Presidential campaign about an extramarital affair with a novice filmmaker, the former Senator admitted to ABC News today.

In an interview for broadcast tonight on Nightline, Edwards told ABC News correspondent Bob Woodruff he did have an affair with 42-year old Rielle Hunter, but said that he did not love her.

Edwards also denied he was the father of Hunter’s baby girl, Frances Quinn, although the one-time Democratic Presidential candidate said he has not taken a paternity test.

Edwards said he knew he was not the father based on timing of the baby’s birth on February 27, 2008. He said his affair ended too soon for him to have been the father.

A former campaign aide, Andrew Young, has said he was the father of the child.

According to friends of Hunter, Edwards met her at a New York city bar in 2006. His political action committee later paid her $114,000 to produce campaign website documentaries despite her lack of experience.

Edwards said the affair began during the campaign after she was hired. Hunter traveled with Edwards around the country and to Africa.

Edwards said his wife, Elizabeth, and others in his family became aware of the affair in 2006.

Edwards made a point of telling Woodruff that his wife’s cancer was in remission when he began the affair with Hunter. Elizabeth Edwards has since been diagnosed with an incurable form of the disease.

When the National Enquirer first reported the alleged Edwards-Hunter affair last October 11, Edwards, his campaign staff and Hunter vociferously denounced the report.

"The story is false, it’s completely untrue, it’s ridiculous," Edwards told reporters then.

He repeated his denials just two weeks ago.

Edwards today admitted the National Enquirer was correct when it reported he had visited Hunter at the Beverly Hills Hilton last month.

The former Senator said his wife had not known about the meeting.

Since becoming pregnant, Hunter has lived under assumed names in a series of expensive homes in North Carolina and, more recently, in Santa Barbara, California.

Edwards denied paying any money to Hunter to keep her from going public but said it was possible some of his friends or supporters may have made payments without telling him.

He said he would ask questions about any possible arrangement.

Watch the full interview tonight on "Nightline" at 11:35 p.m. ET

Posted in Adultery, John Edwards, Journalism | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on John Edwards Admits Affair

Photos & Video From Yesterday’s Protest At The Chinese Embassy

Jewish World Watch organized the event.

Photos: Marchers Marchers Marchers Marchers Protester Protesters Protester Rabbi Ehud Sela (Sinai Temple), Janice Kamenir-Resnik (JWW), Rabbi Ari Leubitz (Bnai David-Judea) Rabbi Ehud Sela blows the shofar Congresswoman Maxine Waters Congresswoman Maxine Waters, Rabbi Joshua Levine-Grater (Pasadena Jewish Temple and Center) Maxine Waters Protester Haig Hovsepian (Community Relations Director, Armenian National Committee – Western Region) Rabbi Ari Leubitz (Bnai David) Rabbi Ari Leubitz Rabbi Ari Leubitz, Janice Rabbi Ari Leubitz, Janice Rabbi Ehud Sela

Video: Rally Rally Janice Kamenir-Resnik Janice Kamenir-Resnik Maxine Waters Rabbi Joshua Levine-Grater, Pasadena Jewish Temple and Center Haig Hovsepian, Community Relations Director, Armenian National Committee – Western Region Rabbi Ari Leubitz Speaks

Posted in Genocide | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Photos & Video From Yesterday’s Protest At The Chinese Embassy

Who Represents?

I subscribed to whorepresents.com for a month for $12 but failed to find publicists for the following celebrities: Amanda Siegfried, Kelly Clarkson, Heidi Montag, and Carrie Underwood.

Posted in Hollywood | Comments Off on Who Represents?

An Interview With Novelist Melodie Bowsher

I talk to Melodie by phone Aug. 7, 2008 about her new book My Lost and Found Life.

Luke: "You were the first woman hired by the Wall Street Journal?"

Melodie: "That is correct. I hate to say how long ago that was."

Luke: "That’s quite an honor."

Melodie: "It happened to be at a time when the Journal decided it had to get with the times. They hired me straight out of journalism school. I was only 20 years old."

"I worked in the Dallas bureau for three years. They covered a seven state area. It was intense. The Journal commands respect wherever they are. We had some big companies to cover, mostly oil and airlines. You alternated between covering the hard financial news and you got a couple of weeks to work on feature stories."

"After the Journal, I discovered that newspapers weren’t where I wanted to be. They were a lot of fun in college but it was not so much fun at the Journal. It was a lot of intense pressure and responsibility. The president of an airline got fired because of an article I wrote. I found that uncomfortable. It was not what I wanted to do.

"I was only 23. I decided to travel around. I went to Colorado for a while and then I came to San Francisco. I ended up in marketing. I worked for Bank of America for a while."

Luke: "How did you come to write your first novel?"

Melodie: "I got laid off in the dotcom crash. From 1997-2000, I was working for a communications firm that did a lot of website development. Everybody was going to make a million. I lost all my stock options when the firm crashed. A lot of companies disappeared. Everybody who was out of work called themselves a consultant or writer. And I was a writer.

"I decided to take advantage of the hiatus and do what I had always wanted to do – to try to write fiction. I just started in 2001, I don’t know, fiddling around with it. And somehow the first line of the book came to me."

The first line: "Five days before I graduated from high school, my mother embezzled a million dollars and disappeared."

Melodie: "Because of my own brush with this kind of embezzlement, someone I knew, and the rest of the book developed easily from that first sentence.

"It was a long and arduous journey to get it published in 2006. I wrote it off and on as I worked on being a freelance marketing writer to pay the bills. Once I wrote it, I rewrote it four times while I struggled to find an agent. I was rejected by 42. Maybe it’s my Journal background. I actually kept a spreadsheet.

"It was hard. Sometimes I’d get discouraged and throw it in the drawer for a while. I’d think about starting another book and forgetting that one, but I was very attached to that book and the storyline so I kept at it. "Finally I landed an agent and she sold the book quickly after I found her.

"It was a grueling path to that agent. There are so many books being written and so many people wanting to write books and the number of bookstores is fewer. They are dominated by the large chains. It’s more difficult than it used to be to get published.

"When I started writing the book, I went away to a writing workshop in Sin Miguel Allende. I’d always wanted to go to San Miguel. I had a great week there. It awakened the dormant fiction writer in me.

"Sometime after I completed the first draft, I found a writing group here in San Francisco. It’s been going since before I was born (not with the same teacher). Anybody can drop in. It’s a wonderful process if you’re not faint of heart. It was very useful to me. I’d read seven pages a week. I was only up to page 40 when I found an agent. Then I stopped reading and sharing with the group because once your agent is marketing your manuscript, you don’t want to have a lot of versions flying around.

"I am working on another book. I belong to two writing groups now. I find them very useful. I would recommend that any writer go to a group. It’s hard to ask your friends for their opinion. If they don’t like your book, what do they say? That’s not useful."

Luke: "What did you find to be the hardest part of completing the novel?"

Melodie:"Letting go. You never really feel you’re finished. You always think you can improve it. I found finding an agent and selling the book a lot harder than writing it. It was a story that meant a lot to me. Not that I’ve embezzled money, but I know what it is like to be a mother who wants to give her kids everything and maybe goes too far and gets herself into some financial jeopardy.

"I have two children. Kids today expect everything. All their friends have new cars and are going to Europe. They have iPods and new Macs and they want to know where their stuff is. It’s very hard for single parents to come up with all of that. The book is about a spoiled and pampered girl who’s used to getting everything she wants. She was very similar to a lot of girls my daughter went to high school with. I can understand the desire to cut corners to give her child everything she wants."

Luke: "How did your children affect this novel?"

Melodie: "My daughter was horrified at first. ‘Everyone’s going to think it’s about me.’ In a way, it is about her. I did do things I shouldn’t have done to give my children the things they wanted. I say the words, ‘Home equity loan.’ Let’s just say I was foolish in the past, but not to the point of embezzlement.

"In the end, my daughter really likes the book.

"A lot of people told me they didn’t like the heroine. She was a brat. That I needed to make her more likable. But she was a character, yes, she was spoiled and pampered, but she didn’t do it herself. Somebody did it for her. She goes through change and transformation. All stories are about transformation. She becomes a better person because of her experiences. Life has made my daughter more practical.

"My son recognizes the real life incident that inspired the story. It was the father of his friend who embezzled money and disappeared. This boy ended up living in a camper behind a gas station. It was very sad. But he pulled out of it.

"I changed the story to a girl because I thought it would be an even more difficult situation for a girl. I fictionalized it a great deal."

Luke: "What have been the most interesting reactions you’ve received to the book?"

Melodie: "Most reaction has been great. It’s called a Young Adults book. I’ve been surprised by the number of 40 and 50 year old men who told me they liked the book. I didn’t write it intentionally for a young female audience. I was just trying to tell a good story."

Luke: "What do you think are your strengths and weaknesses as a writer?"

Melodie: "We all struggle with self-doubt. I’m a journalist at heart so I don’t tend to wax poetic or add a lot of words to my writing or make it flowery. I have a journalistic style. Some people could say that’s a weakness. That happens to be what I like to read. I don’t like to read a book with a lot of extraneous digressions."

"I have to have time to concentrate to write. Stephen King supposedly wrote in his family’s laundry room with all sorts of distractions going around. I don’t find that easy."

Luke: "Do you find writing painful?"

Melodie: "It’s a matter of getting the first draft down, then working on it. Once I have the first draft down, I enjoy massaging it."

Posted in Author Interviews | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on An Interview With Novelist Melodie Bowsher

Aviv Tuchman – The Best Solution To The RCC

I ran into a bloke the other day who felt like he was dealing with a corrupt beit din at the Rabbinical Council of California.

I referred him to attorney Aviv Tuchman at [email protected].

Posted in RCC | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Aviv Tuchman – The Best Solution To The RCC