Maybe McCain Cares Too Much About This Country?

Maybe he works too hard?

Maybe he’s too qualified?

From Greg Gutfeld on the Fox News show Red Eye when he was challenged to say something bad about McCain.

Posted in Greg Gutfeld | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Maybe McCain Cares Too Much About This Country?

Attack of the Skanks

From Deadspin.com:

"Boys Will Be Boys", Jeff Pearlman’s fascinating account of the glory days of the Cowboys dynasty is making the media rounds this week and we will happily join in to promote it. It is ridiculously entertaining. Yes, Charles Haley is the star, but there is so much more to it than just his dong-flapping craziness. Honestly, buy it. It’s worth its weight in White House coke. Pearlman has generously offered up another chapter titled "Chapter 24: Super Bowl XXX (AKA: Attack of the Skanks) for the Deadspin readership

"After the Super Bowl ended, nobody wanted to leave the locker room. It was like being a marine at sea for seven months. You come to land and think everyone wants to run off the ship. But no one wanted to leave. They knew it was the end and they wanted it to last."—Robert Bailey, Cowboys cornerback

When the Dallas Cowboys prepared to leave Texas for Tempe, Arizona, the site of Super Bowl XXX, they made certain every necessary item was packed and loaded for the 1,056-mile journey.
Helmets—check!
Pads—check!
Athletic tape—check!
Shoes—check!
Playbooks—check!
Skanks—check!
Skanks?

Yes, you read that correctly. Skanks. Lots of skanks.

Being a veteran team with a wealth of Super Bowl experience, members of the Cowboys had learned what they needed to survive—and, indeed, thrive—in the week before the big game. Leading up to the first two Super Bowls, Cowboys players combed the streets, clubs and bars of Los Angeles and, to a lesser extent, Atlanta. Yet such an approach comes with risk. The women, for example, could be stalkers. Killers. They might have STDs. Or older brothers with a quick fingers and loaded XM8 lightweight assault rifles.

Hence, the skanks. Knowing that the wives and family members would not arrive in Tempe until the Thursday or Friday before the big game, several Cowboys—ranging from Emmitt Smith and Charles Haley to Erik Williams and Nate Newton—paid for a fleet of 11 white stretches from the First Impression Limousine Service to drive 16 hours and 1,000 miles from Dallas to Tempe, many with their special skank, uh, female friends along for the ride. The price: $1,000 per night per limo (Far from objecting, Jerry Jones brought along his own party vehicle, the six-bed tour bus that once belonged to Whitney Houston). By the time the Cowboys arrived for check-in at The Buttes, the team’s first-class, $285-per-night hotel, on the Sunday before the game, the lobby was filled with tacky high heels and legs that stretched from Minneapolis to Mahopac.

"The limo thing was as blatant as anything the Cowboys had ever been a part of," says one team employee. "We had this huge caravan arrive from Dallas, and some guys had a bunch of their dancer girlfriends ride out and party with them. They brought the White House to Arizona."

Irvin enthusiastically endorsed the port-a-skank concept and, in fact, rented his own 10-passenger, 30-foot monstrosity customized with a black leather-and-brushed crome interior (and equipped with a bounty of Absolut Vodka and hip-hop CDs). What baffled some about Irvin’s ways was that his wife Sandy was intelligent, loving, an excellent mother to the couple’s two daughters—and drop-dead gorgeous. "She’s the most beautiful black woman I’ve ever seen with my eyes," says Kenny Gant, the former Cowboy defensive back. "I’ve loved her to death since the first time I met her." Yet Irvin—who sported a large gold cross around his neck—never thought twice about professing his devotion toward his family one minute, then jumping into the hot-tub with two coked-up strippers the next. Why, on the evening before the Cowboys departed for Tempe, Irvin had partied with a pair of prostitutes at the Irving Residence Inn.

"This stuff happened more and more under Barry, because the rules were just completely relaxed," says a team employee. "Now here comes Deion Sanders, the most flamboyant guy going. The combination of Sanders’ flamboyant ways, Irvin’s lifestyle and the fact that Barry Switzer said, ‘Hell, I don’t care what you do. I’ll see you Sunday afternoon,’—it led to bad things."

Awaiting the Cowboys and their high-heeled entourage in Tempe were the AFC-champion Pittsburgh Steelers, a gritty 11–5 football team that had upended the Indianapolis Colts in the AFC Championship Game to reach its first Super Bowl in 16 years. Were there ever a textbook example of overlooking an opponent, here it was. The Steelers featured the league’s No. 2-ranked run defense and a powerful tailback in 244-pound Bam Morris, but nobody—the Cowboys, the media, the fans—believed Pittsburgh could challenge Big D.

When the Cowboys prepared for Super Bowl XXVII three years earlier, they practiced with an intensity that Jimmy Johnson and his crew demanded. This time around members of the team came and went as they pleased, working out with half-hearted determination. In what was undoubtedly a Super Bowl first, Nate Newton, Erik Williams, Leon Lett and Irvin took a stretch Lincoln to and from practices. The players stayed out early into mornings and arrived to work hungover following wild sojourns to clubs like Empire and Jetz & Stixx. "The police came in and gave us a list of places not to go," Newton said. "I wrote ’em all down and went there."

The Cowboy who partied the hardest, the longest, the latest was not Irvin or Sanders or Newton or Lett but Barry Switzer, 58-year-old night owl. The Cowboy coach transformed his two-bedroom suite into a 24-hour rave, with an endless stream of family members, friends, confidants and strangers. "You have to understand the scene," says Michael Silver, the former Sports Illustrated scribe who spent much of the week alongside Switzer. "Barry basically decided, ‘OK, this is the only time I’ll ever be at a Super Bowl and I’m going to live it up.’ So he called everyone he knew and said, ‘C’mon, we’re all going to the Super Bowl!’" Along for the ride were—among others—Switzer’s three children, his girlfriend Becky Buwick, his ex-wife Kay (the two women shared a room) and a never-ending conga line of former Oklahoma players, coaches and boosters. The end-of-the-week liquor bill exceeded $100,000.

Posted in Dallas | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Attack of the Skanks

Boys Will Be Boys

From Green Bay:

Other players who stand out in Pearlman’s book are Haley, a “tragic and victorious” defensive end whose exploits can’t be repeated in print, and linebacker Robert Jones, one of the lone Cowboys to not give in to the temptation of celebrity.

“Jones is my favorite guy in a lot of ways. Here’s someone with a hard-scrabble background, who just wanted to have a family, to look under a Christmas tree and see presents for his kids,” Pearlman said. “And he wasn’t a great football player. A good one, yes. But football was simply a way to have his dream come true.”

On a team that partied like it was New Year’s Eve every day of the week, Jones was the subject of “peer pressure and ridicule few have probably ever experienced,” Pearlman said. But in a redemptive touch at the end of the book, two of his biggest tormentors — Irvin and offensive lineman Nate Newton — apologized to Jones after their playing days and commended him for having his priorities in the right place.

It’s those shades of gray that will either lead football fans to condemn the Dallas organization out of sheer spite or write the behavior off as “boys being boys” more than a decade later.

But could a team as outlandish as the ’90s Cowboys exist today? Because of the NFL’s personal conduct policy and the rise of fast-spreading Internet blogs charting athletic extra-curriculars, probably not, Pearlman said.

Also, as the perceived villainy of current Dallas players Owens, Adam “Pacman” Jones and Tank Johnson proves, “the public is more judgmental of our athletes today. I think maybe we have higher expectations than we used to.”

Posted in Dallas | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Boys Will Be Boys

Jewish Federation Of LA Board Chair Stanley P. Gold Bores Beth Jacob

Stanley Gold spoke at Beth Jacob Shabbos morning. He’s a lousy public speaker and left the crowd sleepy.

Gold said before taking the position at the Federation, he asked his wife and kids if he should take the job. They both said no. That told him he should take it.

Posted in Jewish Federation | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Jewish Federation Of LA Board Chair Stanley P. Gold Bores Beth Jacob

Essential Books For Understanding The Iraq War

Hugh Hewitt writes:

…Dexter Filkins’ brilliant, riveting and deeply disquieting The Forever War, now making its way up best-sellers lists. Filkins is a reporter for the New York Times, and The Forever War is a memoir of his first eight years covering the war in Afghanistan and Iraq. Very, very few people have seen as much of the front lines as Filkins, and only a handful have the talent to convey those lines to the people of the west.

I spent two hours with Filkins on yesterday’s radio show, and the podcasts of those hours are available here and here, and the transcript here. The book is a journey back to the beginning of his assignment to Afghanistan in 1998 and forward through the long years that followed there and in Iraq, but yesterday’s interview was more than a preview of the book, it was also an epilogue of sorts as Filkins is just back from Pakistan, and his report should leave you much more alarmed about Waziristan than market turmoil. Markets can recover from sharp losses. The West may not be able to recover from a Pakistan engulfed by a rising Islamist extremism and Taliban hegemony along the border with Afghanistan.

The Forever War is a clear-eyed, unsentimental look at the horrible brutality of the Taliban and Saddam, and a first hand account of the extraordinary difficulty of rebuilding societies shattered by their distinct but equally deadly forms of cruel barbarism. It can evoke tears for the victims, and a deep sorrow for the lost and wounded American soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines who have sacrificed so much in the course of the battles. The insanity of post-invasion Iraq is carefully recounted, as is the extraordinary courage and commitment of our military as well as of the tens of thousands of Iraqis who have stepped up to try and save their country, often only to be slaughtered by the fanatics from both the Sunni and Shia ranks. The marvel in Filkins’ voice at the changes that have come to Iraq in the past two years is a testament to the reality of the massive progress there, but the menace of what has gone before and might return as well as that of what lurks in the remotest regions of the "Pashtuland" cannot be missed. The presidential campaign seems absurd given its neglect of these crises. Filkins has done his part. Now the rest of MSM needs to read him and start pushing Obama and McCain on their plans for combating this menace.

But one book, even one as superb as The Forever War, cannot begin to convey the complexity and difficulty of the peril at hand.

For those of you interested in the Necessary Bookshelf (which means being interested in the future of the country and your children and grandchildren), here are the other titles on it:

The Looming Tower by Lawrence Wright.
The geneology of al Qaeda –where it came from, and what it wants.

The Nuclear Jihadist by Douglas Frantz and Catherine Collins
How Pakistan came by its nukes, and the other countries that might have them as well.

Dreams and Shadows by Robin Wright
A tour of the dictatoriships of the Middle East.

Legacy of Ashes by Timothy Weiner
An account of the sixty years of blindness on the part of our intelligence community to the threats that have and continue to confront us.

Moment of Truth in Iraq by Michael Yon
The turning of the tide, and why it happened.

The Crisis of Islam by Bernard Lewis
The way back and why it matters today. Continued…

World War IV by Norman Podhoretz
The broad landscape of the ideological war.

Faith, Reason and the War Against Jihadism by George Weigel
The religious fanaticism of the jihadists, and how MSM must come to grips with it.

America Alone by Mark Steyn
The demographics and their impact on the long war.

Imperial Grunts and Hog Pilots, Blue Water Grunts by Robert Kaplan
The good guys

The Pentagon’s New Map, by Thomas P.M. Barnett
Where the disconnected must be connected

The Soul of Battle by Victor Davis Hanson
How the West wins the wars it must win.

Posted in Iraq | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Essential Books For Understanding The Iraq War

So What Is It Like To Have A Rock Star Dad?

In the Seventh-Day Adventist world I grew up in, my dad was like a rock star.

He’d get mobbed when he went out in public and learned the bitter truth of Sartre’s aphorism that "Hell is other people."

As for me, my first girlfriend probably put it best: "The more you try to be different from him, the more you’ll be like him."

Since my earliest years, I’ve been a bloke who prefers to take rather than to give.

Growing up the son of a controversial theologian, I got treated wonderfully by two types of people — those who loved my dad and those who hated him (they wanted to prove how big of heart they were). I never remember anyone treating my badly because of who my dad was.

I learned from my dad how to live in community, how to live on the edge of community, and how to live without community.

I’m getting ready for Shabbat by rereading Milton Hook’s biography of him, "Desmond Ford: Reformist Theologian, Gospel Revivalist".

Everyone should be so privileged to have their life written up by somebody who loved them.

Roy Branson wrote in the Dec. 1994 issue of Spectrum magazine that my dad had "more than any other one person, made Adventists care passionately about theology."

Many marked my dad’s departure from the Adventist church in 1980 as the date "the very Spirit had departed from their church." (Milton Hook)

The key question, writes Hook, is: "How could one man exert so much theological momentum in the culture of Seventh-Day Adventism, a group so protective of its traditions and so resistant to change?"

Dr. Hook begins my dad’s story with this quote from my paternal grandfather to my dad: "You can have a shilling for every book you read."

This is a family tradition that my dad continued with me. By age eight, I was hooked on reading.

My dad’s parents divorced when he was nine.

Around this time, a Seventh-Day Adventist came knocking. Charles Bird was the Northern Queensland Mission superintendent for the church. He began an affair with my dad’s mom Lillian. My dad in turn became close to the wronged woman Ruth.

My dad left high school in tenth grade and became a journalist. He was offended by the profanity of his peers, got baptized into the Adventist church at age 16 (to his parents’ displeasure), and eventually made his way to the Australasian Missionary College (Avondale).

By saving his pennies, my dad bought a second-hand copy of the Encyclopedia Britannica where for the first time he discovered the disturbing insights of Higher Criticism.

Under the influence of Ellen White‘s book Messages to Young People, he stopped reading fiction and going to the movies.

Dr. Hook includes a couple of pages from my dad’s 1942 diary. Not surprisingly, there’s zero emotional introspection. Instead there are comments such as "Jap cruiser sunk" and "Saw beach girl contest."

Posted in Personal | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on So What Is It Like To Have A Rock Star Dad?

Book Review: Desmond Ford: Reformist Theologian, Gospel Revivalist

I look around the Web and it is hard to find anyone hatin’ on my dad these days.

Steve Parker writes:

Milton Hook has written the first full biography of Desmond Ford – and it is a great read! It provides some timely insight into the man, his message, and the denomination he served for so many years.

Hook writes passionately about his subject and disclaims any idea that history can be written absolutely objectively. Despite that, Desmond Ford is superbly documented with detailed endnotes. And for those of us who know some of the history it resonates as truth. As Hook points out in his introduction to the reader, many of the people he refers to as he tells Ford’s story intersected with Hook’s own life giving him a direct perspective on the events. But the primary source for the story comes from Des Ford himself.

I can remember, as a young boy, sitting in my country church listening to a much younger Des Ford answering question after question on the Bible. I was impressed with the breadth and depth of his knowledge and the passion with which he spoke.

Posted in Adventist | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Book Review: Desmond Ford: Reformist Theologian, Gospel Revivalist

My Dad On The Atonement

Jared Wright writes:

When Desmond Ford speaks, Adventists still listen. In fact speaking with people who heard Dr. Ford’s presentation, it became clear that much, if not most, of Adventism is aligned theologically with Desmond Ford where atonement is concerned. Imagine that! Adventism and Desmond Ford in agreement.

The live updates hit a slight SNAFU amid my running to and fro at Loma Linda today. Namely, my computer decided to wipe all my notes from Dr. Ford’s presentation. You know what they say about the best laid plans…

So I’m now sitting alone in the balcony of the Campus Hill Church as more crowds gather ahead of the 8:00 presentation by Dr. Ford entitled "This I believe."

Reminiscing on Dr. Ford’s presentation earlier today, what really struck me was the force with which he demands that the forensic view of atonement (that a sacraficial death was necessary and Jesus was that sacrifice on our behalf so we do not have to pay the penalty for sin).

Dr. Ford spoke eloquently and passionately with a pastor’s heart. He filled his homily with zippy one-liners:

"It doesn’t matter who you are but rather whose you are."

"You don’t have to be good to be saved, but you must be saved to be good."

Posted in Adventist | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on My Dad On The Atonement

My Dad’s Faith

Bernard Brandstatter writes:

FordCampusHill.jpg

I heard both of Des Ford’s lectures and the extended panel discussion in the afternoon (in which Fritz Guy, Kendra Haloviak, Larry Christoffel and Jon Paulien joined Des on the platform). At the end of both sessions Des fielded questions submitted by the audience.

1. I did not hear a single word yesterday that suggested any shift in Ford’s opinions. He stuck to his theological guns, defending his version of forensic justification. Of course it’s a metaphor, he admitted, and we need the many other salvation metaphors to complete our understanding. He even credited the moral influence theory as having some validity for us, but not an adequate framework to explain the horrors of the crucifixion.

2. Ford was unfailingly kind and generous, even affectionate, in his references to the Adventist Church. This attitude of graciousness has been his hallmark despite unkind treatment he has received over the years. He still comes across as regarding himself as a faithful Adventist, simply trying to continue the process of restudying and tidying our biblical understandings after a sincere but unscholarly beginning by William Miller. He described Miller as a man led by God to wake up a spiritually dead continent and direct the world to the promised Second Coming.

Posted in Adventist | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on My Dad’s Faith

Why Does Desmond Ford

It is precisely because of these sorts of theological controversies that I ran as far as I could from Christianity.

When the Torah says to keep the Sabbath or bring two turtle doves to the temple, it is pointing out a profound philosophy — you can do it!

You are not helpless in your sins. You don’t need a savior. You don’t need to wait for salvation to drop from above. You don’t need to eat the flesh or drink the blood of the god.

You’ve got the Torah. You just do it.

David Larson writes:

John Wesley (1703-91)

Those of us who write about others usually reveal much about ourselves. I believe that Milton Hook does this in Desmond Ford: Reformist Theologian, Gospel Revivalist (Riverside, Calif.: Adventist Today Foundation, 2008). Among other things, he tells us that he is not happy with the Wesleyan heritage that we Seventh-day Adventists share.

Hook’s unhappiness with what we have inherited from John and Charles Wesley and their colleagues in eighteenth-century England is one of his book’s continuing threads. Early on, he refers to a colleague’s “Wesleyan fundamentalist’s perspective on salvation themes” that contributed to his eventual “hostility toward Des and his gospel emphasis” (70). Toward the end of his account, he writes that this same colleague subsequently used phraseology that “was vintage Roman Catholicism from the Councils of Trent.” He states that “it was also the raw Wesleyan perfectionism” that caused a prominent Seventh-day Adventist scholar “to wring his hands in dismay, predicting a reversion to its emphasis in the 1970s” (302).

He notes that Ford admits that for some time “there still lingered in his thinking some traces of the justification plus sanctification model of salvation, so pervasive in the SDA church” (93; emphasis in original). He observes that “the Wesleyan strand had rope-like proportions in early Seventh-day Adventism and persisted at length” (97). He writes that another colleague, “perhaps ignorantly, was coaxing the constituency back to the Roman Catholic Councils of Trent and the second blessing of Wesleyanism, the two sources that advocated self-generated righteousness with God’s assistance as the essence of sanctification” (288–89).

Posted in Adventist | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Why Does Desmond Ford