When The Man Left Zambia, The Natives Started Buggering Each Other To Death

When the British ran the country that became Zambia, the natives had an average life expectancy of around 65 years.

Since they’ve taken charge of their own affairs, their standard of living has halved along with their life expectancy.

As Wikipedia says: "Per capita annual incomes are currently at about one-half their levels at independence and, at $395, place the country among the world’s poorest nations. Social indicators continue to decline, particularly in measurements of life expectancy at birth (about 40.9 years) and maternal mortality (830 per 100,000 pregnancies)[1]."

I wonder how average life expectancy rates have done in South Africa over the past 15 years?

I just found this news report:

JOHANNESBURG, 21 November 2009 (PlusNews) – South Africans are dying younger and in greater numbers, and HIV/AIDS is to blame, according to a report released this week by the South African Institute of Race Relations.

Average life expectancy declined from 62 years in 1990 to 50 years in 2007; it is projected to fall even further by 2011, to 48 years for men and 51 for women, according to the Institute’s annual South Africa Survey.

The authors note that among 37 developed and developing countries, South Africa is one of only six where life expectancy fell between 1990 and 2007, with only Zimbabwe showing a steeper decline.

So when the natives did not run these nations, the natives lived a lot longer. Correlation or coincidence?

What spurs a nation to descend into reckless buggery?

AIDS is pretty damn difficult to catch unless you are sharing needles or getting buggered. You have to really put your ass out there.

I wonder if there is any benefit to thinking of these nations as akin to teenagers getting a driver’s license. As soon as they start driving on their own, they start killing themselves and others with their recklessness. A lot of teenagers need strong authority or they kill themselves and others.

I’m also thinking about working for yourself versus working for others. I’ve usually worked for myself. I’ve never made over $50,000 in a year. The quickest way for most people to make money is to go out and get a job. When you work for yourself, it is easy to slack off and do things in a slovenly way. When you work for a boss, he holds you accountable.

I wonder if these African natives who are dying like flies need a boss. Apparently they are not fit for governing themselves.

Maybe Freud and Judaism are right that civilization begins with sexual discipline.

America is far more sexually disciplined (a higher percentage of people here marry rather than live together) and old fashioned in that arena than Europe and far more prosperous.

Posted in Africa | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on When The Man Left Zambia, The Natives Started Buggering Each Other To Death

Do We Need An Exit Strategy In Afghanistan?

Dennis Prager said on his radio show today: I thought if Afghanistan was the good war? I don’t care that 48% of Americans want to leave. What will happen if we leave?

The notion that we need an exit strategy. I thought that if you were at war, you need a victory strategy. Exit strategies are needed by the loser. I want to know the difference between exit strategy and losing? I am unfamiliar with any distinction possible.

This notion by Nancy Pelosi and others that we need an exit strategy. No we don’t. We need a victory strategy. If it takes 20 years, it will take 20 years. Meanwhile, Americans will be more safe.

We don’t need an exit strategy from South Korea. We’ve had troops in South Korea since 1954. There’s been no exit strategy. So long as there is no war with the North Koreans and the Chinese, isn’t it worth it?

Posted in Afghanistan, Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Do We Need An Exit Strategy In Afghanistan?

In A Relationship

I was just checking out the Facebook profile of my predominantly hetero friend Joey Kurtzman who’s in India.

I saw that he was "In a relationship" with his mate David.

I love that. I immediately changed my status to "In a relationship" and wanted to put that I was in a relationship with Joey Kurtzman but he would have to confirm that before it showed up and what if he rejected me? And what if people got the wrong idea about Joey and me.

I’m not gay or anything. I just want to be in a relationship. Is that so wrong?

I wanted to put that I was in a relationship with a certain professor of Jewish literature at UCLA but feared she would defriend me for my chutzpah. That, and she’d lose her tenure.

Beth Podel Cartwright posts on Facebook: SocialInterview.com asked me "If Luke Ford came with an instruction manual, what would the first chapter be called?"

I answered ”Caution: Fragile”

Posted in Personal | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on In A Relationship

Black America’s Attachment To Barack Obama

Dennis Prager did his radio show today from Zambia.

He notes that a new poll shows that only 19% of Americans believe Obama that healthcare reform won’t add to the federal budget deficit.

"The man is so far left that only the left will support. Unions will support him because they get a great payoff and they’re on the left.

"There is no other reason to support him.

"Black America will support him because black America is politically but not socially on the left. They feel a personal relationship to the president. They have a sense of, his failure is their failure and his success is their success. It’s understandable but very unfortunate. One should not be tied that way."

"When a president who is not personally disliked has bad poll numbers, it is particularly bad because people are saying, it’s not you Barack Obama, we can’t stand your policies."

Posted in Barack Obama, Dennis Prager | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Black America’s Attachment To Barack Obama

Psychology As A Weapon

"Do you think you’re attracted to emotionally unavailable women?" she had asked.

She was sure he was still enmeshed in his parents. By contrast, she said, she had made great strides in this area.

She was wise and all-knowing. He was but a helpless infant she was tiring of.

She used psychology as a weapon. She had no training in the field but she’d had years of therapy and she had read a few books.

Sunday night she’d suggested he talk things over with his therapist and then call her.

"What does your therapist say about that?"

What a common question in relationships. He feared that even he had said that, not just in his current relationship, but in previous ones.

"I’d be dying to know what your therapist thinks about that."

Oy vey!

So today he said to his therapist, "**** wants me to talk to my therapist about all this before calling her back."

She smiled.

After his session, he called her.

"Hello," she said, her voice low.

"MY THERAPIST SAYS" he announced.

There was a long pause.

"Just kidding," he says. "My therapist doesn’t say anything. I’m not doing directive therapy. She’s just interested in how I’m doing, what I’m feeling, am I being true to my feelings, am I willing to be vulnerable, had I thought about alternative courses of action, etc. She doesn’t have any grand pronouncement to make about our political and religious differences and whether or not they spell doom for our relationship."

She was quiet.

He could tell she was disappointed.

"How are you?" he asked.

"Bad," she said.

"Is it the medication?" he asked.

"No," she said.

Her voice was low. That always meant doom. Nothing good happened for him with her when her voice was this low.

It was her break-up voice.

If her meds weren’t making her feel bad, then he was.

"Let’s take a break," she said. "Let’s talk again Friday or motzi Shabbos."

"OK," he said. "Goodbye."

Posted in Personal, Psychology | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Psychology As A Weapon

Shot Down At Kiddish

She called at 5:30 pm Friday. He heard the ring and looked at the caller ID and walked out to the street to get her, to bring her inside the gate, and finally inside the hovel.

It’d been a couple of months since she’d joined him on a Friday night.

That was OK. They were not in a relationship. They were just spending time together.

If they had been in a relationship, then spending Shabbat together would be important. If they were in a relationship, it would be important that she return his calls promptly. If they were in a relationship, they’d make demand on each other. That’s what a relationship is about, he thinks. You build a life together by giving up some freedom and making some commitments and doing some things that you don’t want to do to achieve the union, to build something magnificent that was unachievable to the single person.

But they weren’t in a relationship. At least not a conventional relationship. They were just hanging out twice a week.

Tonight would be the third time this week that he’s seen her. There was Sunday and Wednesday night.

He brings her into the hovel. It’s cramped. There’s no room for a table with a white tablecloth. Instead he pushes the keyboard aside on his computer desk.

He forgot to light candles. The hovel does not feel very Shabbosdic.

To compensate for his failure to light candles, he decides to start with singing "Shalom Aleichem."

Normally when she comes over, he just cuts straight to kiddish.

She’s rolling her eyes and not enjoying his singing.

He asks for her help with the Hebrew of Eishet Chayil. She refuses.

He feels miffed, shot down, cut off at the knees. He feels like he’s walking down a staircase and the stair isn’t where he expected, so he’s falling through space.

He fills the kiddish cup. She’s crumped on the ground, leaning against his book shelf.

She’s equally sick at the confrontation and she’s feeling that she’s about to be abandoned.

"Do you want to rise for kiddish?" he asks.

She doesn’t.

"If I hadn’t pushed her for Shalom Aleichem, she would’ve joined me for kiddish like she normally does," he thinks.

He sings the kiddish, his stomach churning.

"I’m not going to react," he tells himself. "I’m not going to ruin this evening. She does things I don’t like and she does a lot more things that I do like. I’m going to stay poised."

He washes his hands and says the blessing. He makes hamotzi on his own and bites off some bread.

It tastes like straw.

He adds some peanut butter and swallows again.

He dishes up the lentil stew. A big bowl for him, a small bowl for her.

He sits down away from her.

"What are you feeling?" she asks. "What do you want to say to me about what just happened?"

He takes a couple of mouthfuls and thinks about what he’s going to say. He doesn’t want to fight over Shabbat dinner.

"I’m disappointed you didn’t want to join me," he says.

"And that’s all your feeling?" she asks.

"Yeah," he says.

Dinner is quiet and awkward. Afterwards, he thinks about asking her to leave (but realizes he wouldn’t be any happier if she did, and he might lose out on opportunities for joy with her). He thinks about embracing her.

He discards those choices and instead asks, "Would you like to hear excerpts from my journal?"

She says yes.

He reads for about 20 minutes from his journal over the past month.

The tension between them disappears as he opens up. By allowing himself to be vulnerable, he opened up space for her to be vulnerable.

They lie down on his bed and embrace.

Their real conversation begins at 9 pm.

"It just felt like a performance," she says. "There’s such a disconnect between the image you present to the world and who you really are. You look chareidi, but you don’t act chareidi. That’s why I embarrassed to hold your hand in public. It’s mares ayin (leading others to sin).

"Your Judaism does not feel authentic to me. That’s why I don’t want to join you in it. Yeah, I make kiddish with friends. I don’t mind making a Shabbat dinner. When I make a seder, it’s the real deal and lasts until 2 a.m. I don’t get your Judaism. It feels phony.

"Why do you want to look like a chareidi Jew but don’t act like a chareidi Jew? If you take your Judaism seriously, then what are you doing with me? I hate Orthodox Jews. I will never marry an Orthodox Jew. If you are serious about your Judaism, then we should break up."

By 10:30 PM, she’s driving home.

Saturday. 3:30 pm. She calls. He comes outside to get her.

She’s dressed in jeans. He wears a suit.

They walk to her friends place a mile away.

She says she’s freaking out at all the Orthodox Jews.

He feels the distance between them.

He sees friends from shul. He hasn’t been to that shul in about two months.

He catches up with his friends and wishes them a "Gut Shabbos."

He forgets their names as he tries to make introductions to his girl.

They wish her "Gut Shabbos." She won’t wish them "Gut Shabbos." Instead, she gives a mild "hi."

She has no interest in meeting them because they are Orthodox Jews.

She won’t hold hands because he looks like a chareidi Jew.

After Shabbos, he suggests they watch the British TV show Coupling with his Netflix instant streaming device.

"I’m surprised," she says. "I’m surprised you wanted to watch a comedy. You take life so seriously, you read such serious books, I didn’t think you’d want to watch comedy."

"Does she know me at all?" he thinks. "I love to laugh."

As she leaves Saturday night, she says, "Call me tomorrow."

He calls her at 11 am. She does not pick up. She does not call back.

He feels low as he does his internet drudgery for his publicist boss. His headache and lethargy grow. He feels too tired to do anything. He wants to save his meager energy for the week ahead. Yet, he can’t face staying home alone any longer.

At 4:30 pm, he leaves for yoga. He sees friends. He finds his energy recharged. His insecurities disappear. When she calls him at 9pm, he picks up, feeling good.

When she talks about breaking up, he’s not flooded with his traditional fear of abandonment. She’s frantic and heart-broken, he feels poised and secure. What a strange turnaround. Normally he’s the one fearing abandonment and wanting her to keep giving them a chance.

Has he burned out on her threats to break-up? Has he become blase? For nine months, she’s been breaking up or threatening to break up. Now he feels strangely strong.

Is he denying his feelings? Is he not in touch with the potential loss? Does he have a yoga high? Or is his therapy kicking in? Is he staying poised in his emotions because he’s using himself in a poised way?

She keeps talking about her sore stomach. He wants to tell her that she’s in a negative mental loop, that she’s clenching and pushing down to her stomach, and that if she would breathe, release excess tension, and think up, returning to her length and width, the stomach ache will go away.

He stays quiet. He’s enjoying his poise. He’s not reacting to her as much. He’s learned a vocabulary through therapy to describe his situation. He’s in an emotionally unsafe relationship, but he can keep control of himself and not allow himself to be perturbed by her emotional hurricanes. He allows himself to enjoy her drama rather than to react to it.

He’s in a day-to-day relationship. They’re not in building mode. If they go a few days without speaking, it’s not a big deal.

Every time we get close, she feels a need to run away.

Where do his fears of loss come from? His fear of abandonment?

It must come from childhood. He’s told that he had a good first year. Then, on his first birthday, his mom got very sick. It was soon diagnosed as bone cancer. He got farmed out to different families. He attached to some of them, but those relationships never lasted beyond a few months.

He didn’t have that one secure attachment in his early childhood. His dad loved him and his mom loved him and his stepmom loved him and his siblings loved him, but those attachments never lasted long in his first five years.

That’s where his insecurity comes from. That’s why his father ran across him at age five flinging manure at other kids and screaming, "I hate you, I hate you." They’d probably rejected him and he reacted badly.

He often reacted badly to rejection, either with anger or depression.

His therapist had a big stuffed bear in her office and he liked to hug it when he talked to her. It made him feel good, like when he hugged ****.

Chaim Amalek emails his Advisory Committee about Lukeford.net:

I still click on it, but no, I don’t actually read much of it anymore even when I do.  Instead, I skim hoping to see some of the old fire, sadly note its absence, and leave.  To begin with the obvious, most of what he writes about these days concerns the Jews, and living in New York, I get more of this on my own or through the failedmessiah web site than I need from Luke.  The remainder seems taken up with the muffled musings of a middle aged man who at times writes as though he were a teenage girl, and this does not do anything for me.   I just don’t want to read anything a man has to say about relationships — that’s women’s work, and it does not interest me.  There’s just not much punch left in this prose.  Also, no young fertile females show up here (really – not a one!), not much politically incorrect material (remember when Luke would cover the late William Pierce?  Good times for all!). All the interesting characters from Luke’s past are gone: Cathy Seipp and the smart set she let Luke socialize with, Jimmy D, Mike Albo, and many others.  In their place we read of Rabbi X and his budget problems at temple Bnai Boredom.  

Luke has become detached from the people and subjects that made writer Luke Ford of Lukeford.com an interesting read, and that’s that.  It happens.

Khunrum emails: “Well put Chaim. I log on occasionally and skim for something of interest…99.99% of the time there is nothing. The recent meanderings on the “He said…She said” relationship are a complete bore. For those of us from “the old days” it’s very sad. Like an old friend has lost his mind. Above all what is missing is the humor. There’s no humor anymore. Jews and “associate” Jews like Robert and myself cannot live without humor. It’s so grim that the recent addition to our Advisory Committee seems to have resigned without giving notice. I don’t blame him.”

Chaim Amalek emails: No humor, no sex worth having, and not even the scent of money. The old lures are gone.
In their place are orthodox rabbis, the occasional nutty older woman (all women lose their heads if by forty they’ve not borne any children), and poverty.

Holly Randall was his last best hope.

Posted in Personal | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Shot Down At Kiddish

The Fighting Rabbi

YNETNEWS reports:

Yuri Foreman is a deeply religious man, but you couldn’t tell it from the way he ruthlessly knocks people out in the boxing ring.

The 29-year-old rabbi-to-be is the World Boxing Association’s newest champion and when he’s not throwing punches in the ring he’s hitting the books by training to become a rabbi.

"I am able to balance both my fighting and my studies to become a rabbi," said Foreman, who made boxing history on Saturday by becoming the first Israeli to win a world championship title.

Fighting on the undercard of the Manny Pacquiao-Miguel Cotto fight, Foreman claimed the WBA super welterweight championship with a 12-round unanimous decision over Puerto Rico’s Daniel Santos.

Posted in Rabbis | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Fighting Rabbi

Have A Little Faith by Mitch Albom

From The Ledger:

Sally Miller and Joy Banks, who both have read Albom’s blockbuster "Tuesdays With Morrie," felt "Faith" was similar in many respects as it develops over the years it takes for one of the main characters to die.

"I was cynical as I was reading the book. It seems like the author has found a pattern that will earn him a lot of money by using the death of people who have meaningful lives. It was nice that he shared the story, but he did the same thing with his professor," Banks said.

Posted in Religion | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Have A Little Faith by Mitch Albom

Reforming CA’s Tax System

Yisroel Pensack writes:

A Chula Vista attorney has submitted a proposal to the California Attorney General’s office for a constitutional amendment that would overhaul the state’s tax system via the voter initiative and referendum process.

Frank D. Walker, 58, the amendment’s author and founder of "Prosper California," a group now forming to support the proposed ballot measure, said the reform would abolish the state income tax for individuals with annual incomes below $150,000 and cap the state income tax rate at 8 percent. Additionally, he said, the proposal abolishes the sales tax, except on tobacco products, alcoholic beverages and motor fuels, and also does away with the state’s corporations tax.

Walker said the measure, which he hopes will qualify to appear on next November’s statewide ballot, repeals the current property tax and establishes a tax of 75 percent on the fair market monthly rental value of non-exempt land, irrespective of the value of buildings, houses, other manmade improvements and growing crops, none of which will be taxed.

Read On

Posted in California, Economics | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Reforming CA’s Tax System

Her Stomach Hurts Over His Political Views

"How do you feel about our discussion Saturday night?" he asks. "Your message said it made you feel scared."

"My stomach hurts so much," she says. "I’m really sad. I probably just didn’t want to know."

"You didn’t," he says.

"It was amazing hearing you speak like that about Judaism," she says. "It was incredible. You were so passionate and articulate. You just displayed a commitment and a maturity that I have never seen in you before."

"It’s the stuff that I’m good at," he says. "A lot of the other stuff we talk about, I’m not necessarily good at. But why I became Jewish, why I observe Judaism, why I study Torah, the role of Judaism in the world, these are all questions I’ve thought a lot about and have articulate answers.

"I was glad that you were finally interested in asking."

"It just confirmed my worst fears," she says. "I was very grateful that you were sharing. It was incredible to see that side of you. Those are two things (right-wing politics and Orthodox Judaism) that I am virulently against."

"I know," he says. "I’ve known that from the first night I met you."

"So why were you attracted to me?" she asks.

"I take your religious and political views as primarily expressions of emotion," he says.

"But it’s how I spend my days," she says. "Our politics are very much a part of what we do."

"Everyone I’ve dated has been left-wing," he says.

"It’s kind of disempowering for me for you not to see how very important it is for me," she says.

"I understand how important it is to you," he says. "Your reaction to religion and your political embrace strikes me as overwhelmingly emotional."

"If it’s emotional to me," she says, "wow. It is very emotional to me. That should give you an idea of how important it is to me."

"You don’t believe in God," he says. "You think it’s a belief in nothing. I think many of your beliefs are also beliefs in nothing. I don’t date you for your political philosophy. I don’t turn to you for your secular philosophies or for solutions to homelessness. None of those things make any difference in why I find you attractive and why I like to spend time with you."

"How can you be with someone who you think believes in nothing?" she asks.

"Easy," he says. "Your views are not that important to me. You’re obsessed with dogs. I love dogs but I don’t have one-one hundredth of your commitment to them. I don’t share it. I don’t need to share it."

"It’s different for me," she says. "It’s hard for me to hear your politics and how you believe in Judaism. I don’t even have friends who are right-wing."

"You said you had a lot of right-wing friends, such as Jack*," he says.

"He’s a million times better," she says.

"Better?" he asks.

"Yeah."

"Well, you told me before you had a lot of right-wing Republican friends," he says.

"Right," she says. "I have many banker friends, but that’s not who I’m with. My whole life is around this progressive group of people. That’s all any of us do — progressive politics. It may not be important to you. As you said yesterday, who cares what a girl’s political views are as long as she’s hot. For me, it’s a massive impediment. It just really crystalized things last night in a way that broke my heart. It’s something I really want to think about."

"That’s funny," he says. "Last night you said you were learning that not all Republicans are evil. I’ve always had friends with completely different political and religious views. It’s not a big deal. Their views on politics and religion do not disqualify them from my friendship. It’s strange for me when I meet people who only want to be with people who share their political and religious views."

"Do you want to be with me?" she asks.

"Yeah," he says. "It’s disappointing when you don’t want to make kiddish with me, like on Friday night. Or on Shabbos afternoon, when you didn’t want to talk to my friends because they were Orthodox. You couldn’t even say Gut Shabbos to them. But those are bumps in the road."

"I’m very shaken by last night," she says. "I’ve been in the moment with you. Not making rules and not worrying about the future. Last night I just feel like my eyes opened wider. I can’t end up with someone who has a different political ideology. My whole life is going to be about this. I can’t end up with an Orthodox Jew.

"So, do we keep doing what we’re doing?"

"Why don’t we take a break?" he says. "And see if we want to come back to it?"

"I was really upset," she says. "But I’m going to be really upset if I am not with you too. I don’t really understand. If we get even closer, how much more heart-broken am I going to be? If you know that ultimately we’re not going to…"

She chokes up.

"I saw this incredible passionate side of you," she says. "I’d prefer if you kicked around cats. I wouldn’t mind that at all. They just make everybody sneeze."

"That’s horrible," he says.

"I’d prefer it," she says. "I’d prefer even a criminal record. Baby, I feel stupid. Maybe I shouldn’t even have brought it up.

"I had nightmares all last night, scary ones that woke me up."

"Were you being chased by big bad Republicans?" he asks.

"Yeah," she says. "These rabbis. I took a baseball bat.

"So you’re not interested in me for philosophy?"

"Nor your political views," he says. "I’ve asked you about them and I’ve enjoyed hearing them but that’s not what turns me on about you. I can get that from a million people. I view your political and religious views as absurd as you view mine. I don’t view them as evil though. I think you view mine as evil. I just think you’re silly. I don’t think you’re a bad person for having your views, but I think you think I am a bad person for having mine."

"I don’t at all," she says. "Just none of it makes sense."

"You talked last night about how it was hard for you to learn that not all Republicans were evil," he says. "If you were true to your beliefs, you would think my political views were evil."

"When you say that I’m misguided," she says, "it doesn’t lead to contempt?"

"I have contempt for many of your views but I don’t have contempt for you," he says. "I don’t think you’ve ever felt that I have contempt for you. That does not come up for me emotionally. I’ve never taken your views that seriously. It’s like getting mad at a three-year-old for not wiping her bottom."

"That’s what you’re comparing my views to?" she asks.

"Yeah, I think they’re childish," he says. "You think mine are absurd or evil and I think yours’ are silly.

"I went through the agony you’re going through now a long time ago. A long time ago, I accurately saw what you stand for. I had the pain of that. I had the pain of you leaving me twice. Last night was the first time you got a full sense of what I stand for."

"I don’t even have friends whose views I think are childish," she says. "I couldn’t be friends with someone who I thought had childish views. It makes me feel incredibly strange. Neither of us should feel that what we stand for is childish. What are we if we are not what we stand for?"

"A lot of people are a lot better than their beliefs," he says.

"But that implies that there’s something wrong with my beliefs," she says.

"We both think there’s something terribly wrong with the other person’s beliefs," he says. "They totally diverge on the most important matters in life. Either the other person is evil or silly in their beliefs. There are those two alternatives."

Posted in Judaism, Personal, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Her Stomach Hurts Over His Political Views