Andrew Breitbart Died Just Before He Was Due To Release Damaging Obama Footage

As soon as I heard Andrew Breitbart was dead, I thought he’d been murdered. Nothing else made sense. The guy was only 43. He was full of life.

He had damaging video of President Obama he was due to release March 1.

And then he was dead.

And some of us wonder if he was murdered. There are a lot of things you can do to someone to make it look like they died of a heart attack.

Here’s more:

In a stunning coincidence, It appears Andrew Breitbart suffered his untimely death just hours before he was set to release damning video footage that could have sunk Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign.
Around three weeks ago on February 9 during the ‘Blog Bash’ event in Washington DC, Breitbart made a prophetic comment that takes on a somewhat chilling nature given the fact that he died in the early hours of March 1st.
Speaking to Lawrence Sinclair of Sinclair News, Breitbart stated, “Wait til they see what happens March 1st.”
It’s almost certain that Breitbart was referring to his plan to release damning footage of President Obama that he had been promising to reveal throughout the month of February.

Posted in Andrew Breitbart | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Andrew Breitbart Died Just Before He Was Due To Release Damaging Obama Footage

Should Israel Attack Iran On Purim?

Neil Rubin:A bizarre thought: Would Israel (for irony’s sake and a whole lot of other reasons) attack Iran on Purim?

Posted in Iran, Israel | Comments Off on Should Israel Attack Iran On Purim?

Do You Lead With Your Jaw?

When life is not what I want, I feel a huge emotional need to clench my jaw. I just want to grind my teeth. I’m frustrated and I have to express this frustration through body tension.

That’s one of the principle ways I know myself — through my layers of body tension. As I’ve learned to let them go over the past few years, I’ve journeyed into a new land and found a new me.

Jan Batty gave a radio interview on the Alexander Technique: “Think about how many millions of times we nod our heads. How we nod our head either frees the spine or brings more tension. When most people nod their head, they lead with their jaw. If you do lead with your jaw, even gently, you create a whole pattern of tension through your body, just like pushing down on a rubber ducky under the water in the bath tub.”

“If you let the desire for the movement to come from the top of the head, that allows a beautiful sliding and gliding on your top joint, which is between your ears.”

“Most people nod their head starting from the jaw, tightening the neck… When you add this body tension, you’re taking away from your emotional availability to life and creating anxiety and extra stress.”

“Decide to receive with our eyes. Sight comes to our eyes. We receive into deep pools. Instead, we push our eyes out to see or to think. That stiffens our whole body. If we only received the image into soft eyes and let that feed our whole body kinaesthetically, that would turn around how we function through the day. The interference is staring or holding or tightening or over-working in the eyes.”

“Notice what happens to yourself when you do that.”

“I didn’t tell a student that if he continues with this, he’ll find a lot of things in his life begin to change. He told me, ‘I’m noticing that when I’m in class and I’m sensing myself with more ease, my learning is changing. I’m appreciating more things. I’m noticing things that are beautiful. I’m relating to my friends differently.'”

Posted in Alexander Technique | Comments Off on Do You Lead With Your Jaw?

James Q. Wilson Was 80

My liberal professor of political science at Sierra Community College nonetheless assigned James Q. Wilson’s poli sci textbook in 1986.

I remember how impressed I was by the book’s fairness and quality. I particularly liked its chapter on the media and its left-wing bias.

In January of 2008, I heard James Q. Wilson speak at a conference on downtown policing.

Here’s my video:

Boston.com reports:

James Q. Wilson, a political scientist who coauthored the influential “Broken Windows” article in The Atlantic Monthly in 1982, which became a touchstone for the move toward community policing in Boston and cities across the country, died early this morning in Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.

He was being treated for leukemia, according to a family friend.

Dr. Wilson, who was 80 and lived North Andover, returned to Boston a few years ago to become the first senior fellow at the Clough Center for the Study of Constitutional Democracy at Boston College, and a distinguished scholar in the college’s political science department.

He had taught at Harvard University for 26 years before leaving in the late 1980s for California, where he had grown up, to teach at the University of California, Los Angeles, and Pepperdine University.

Considered one of the nation’s most significant thinkers about crime and other urban matters, Dr. Wilson cowrote the Atlantic article with George L. Kelling.

The article, Dr. Wilson said last year in an interview with The Wall Street Journal, suggested that “public order is a fragile thing, and if you don’t fix the first broken window, soon all the windows will be broken.”

Kelling and Dr. Wilson wrote in the Atlantic that “at the community level, disorder and crime are usually inextricably linked, in a kind of developmental sequence. Social psychologists and police officers tend to agree that if a window in a building is broken and is left unrepaired, all the rest of the windows will soon be broken. This is as true in nice neighborhoods as in rundown ones. Window-breaking does not necessarily occur on a large scale because some areas are inhabited by determined window-breakers whereas others are populated by window-lovers; rather, one unrepaired broken window is a signal that no one cares, and so breaking more windows costs nothing. (It has always been fun.)”

Posted in Crime | Comments Off on James Q. Wilson Was 80

The Largest, Most Public Agunah Campaign Ever

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on The Largest, Most Public Agunah Campaign Ever

Who Lost China And Who Killed Andrew?

As soon as I saw the headline this morning on NYTimes.com, I thought Andrew had been murdered.

Now I keep reading it was natural causes.

My second thought was, “I’m next!”

I’m 45. Andrew was just 43. All these writers I’ve known in their 40s who died — Cathy Seipp, David Aaron Clark, and now Andrew Breitbart.

When and where’s the funeral?

TabloidBaby tweets: Heard Breitbart subbing for Dennis Miller last week, winded, saying he couldn’t fit in his clothes. Thought he was Louie Anderson.

Breitbart sipping red wine, talking politics at The Brentwood bar an hour before he died. Fellow barfly: “No signs anything was wrong.”

Posted in Andrew Breitbart | Comments Off on Who Lost China And Who Killed Andrew?

Andrew Breitbart Was 43

I met Andrew through Cathy Seipp in 2002 and the last time I saw him was at her funeral in 2007.

During those five years, Andrew and I were at the same parties about 50 times and we had many conversations.

In late 2007, I gave up on making my living from blogging and our paths diverged. We occasionally stayed in touch online.

Mickey Kaus kept blogging that one day all of us would work for Andrew Breitbart.

(Andrew often said that “Mickey is smarter than all of us.”)

I interviewed Breitbart twice for my blog — in 2004 and in 2009.

There was no difference between Andrew’s public and private persona (except that in public he took the normal precautions to preserve important relationships).

Around 2004, he took me to dinner at the Magic Carpet and then we walked Pico Blvd and talked about our plans. He wanted to make a big impact on the world for conservative values. He was thinking about making a documentary. He wondered if we could do anything together.

We were pioneering bloggers who’d felt for years that we were the future of journalism. We’d tasted some success but wanted much more.

We were scruffy and disreputable and yearning for acclaim.

We were looking for our niche. “Blogger” was not sufficient.

Andrew badly wanted to be a pundit. I badly wanted out of porn. We both wanted mainstream success and respectability. We had inexhaustible appetites for attention and we were willing to brawl online to get it.

Breitbart was not satisfied with his present position at the Drudge Report, even though it allowed him to provide well for his family.

Andrew told me many things off-the-record (which leading conservative thinkers were gay, how the Drudge Report got many of its scoops, etc) and he appreciated that I always respected that status. He talked about the leading conservative intellectuals who’d push for play on DrudgeReport.com. He was careful about his relationship with Matt Drudge and wanted to make sure that I would never reveal anything that would damage that.

Trusting me with all sorts of damaging information, Andrew demonstrated a deep capacity for friendship. We only had positive interactions. When I heard about Andrew falling out with people I knew, I instinctively took Andrew’s side (though I knew he was tempestuous and a loose cannon).

The conservative blogger sometimes said to me that he wished he could be religious but that he had no natural inclination in that direction. We never talked about dying or the next life. He never displayed any concern about his health (though the well-being of his family was always a top priority).

Andrew made a bigger impact on the American body politic then he imagined during our dinner in 2004.

He would be thrilled at all the attention he’s received today (and over the past three years).

The second to last time I heard from Andrew was via AIM on Dec. 30, 2010. He said this Die Antwoord video was the freakiest thing he’d ever seen.

The last time I heard from Andrew was via AIM on Feb. 17, 2011. He was pushing the Pigford scandal.

What sticks in my mind about Andrew was how generous he was. For instance, he was always generous with his opinions. Our conversations were 90% Andrew and 10% me. That was fine as I didn’t know as many people as he did and didn’t have as much gossip.

I learned through blogging that my gift is not in advocacy, and so as I’ve aged, I’ve felt less and less need to share my opinions.

Andrew loved to talk and I loved to listen. He was far more successful than I was and I wanted to know more about how he did it.

I was not so much interested in his ideas as in his observations, particularly the gossipy ones. Andrew was more of an activist than an intellectual.

Though our political and cultural views were virtually identical, Andrew was far more partisan. Politics played the same role in Andrew’s life as religion did in mine. As I went to shul almost every day, Andrew went to political battle.

Because I agreed with him, it was easy for me to love Andrew. If I were a left-winger, however, it would be hard not to hate Andrew Breitbart.

We were both interested in and affected by the porn industry. Andrew had watched a great deal of Cinemax growing up and he respected a great set even when they were bestowed on political adversaries such as Susan Sarandon.

Behaviorally, Andrew was monogamous. Intellectually, he had to know.

His mission in life was to take down the left.

I never saw Andrew at peace. His life was always drama.

Andrew and I were sad about Cathy’s terminal lung cancer. It never occurred to either of us that we too could go in our 40s.

Here are some of my past references to Andrew on my blog:

February, 2002: “I chat with Andrew Breitbart, assistant to Matt Drudge. He’s listened to Dennis Prager almost daily since 1991, about the same length of time as me.”

February, 2005: “11pm. I walk out with Sandra Tsing Loh and Andrew Breitbart. Andrew insists that Sandra opens up the vodka bottle she won during the night’s festivities and they start taking shots on the street. The bouncer quite properly moves them along.”

April, 2005: “While locked in an intense discussion about “tumescence” with Andrew Breitbart (he didn’t know the meaning of the word), I found my hand smushing something soft and inviting. I looked over and noticed I was fondling Jackie’s breast in front of her fiance Antoine (the only white guy I’ve met with that name). Neither of them minded and neither did I.”

I believe the first time I had an extended conversation with Andrew was at a party I went to in 2002 at the Culver City apartment of Wired’s Noah Shachtman.

Our interaction that night set the template for our future — Andrew would hold forth and I would hold on.

I grew up an evangelical Seventh-Day Adventist and Andrew’s conversion fervor was familiar to me.

Noah writes today:

…But I knew a different Andrew Breitbart, the one before he started his eponymous series of conservative websites, before he co-founded the left-wing Huffington Post, and before became a best-selling author. In the middle of the 2000s, Breitbart was still the (largely) hidden hand behind the uber-popular Drudge Report. He was a partisan back then, a deep one. But he was more interested in shooting the shit with friends than in picking political fights.

Back then, Breitbart was at the center of a remarkable journalistic scene in Los Angeles, where every reporter — left-wing and right, two-bit porno-bloggers and high-powered Los Angeles Times columnists — all had a place. Zany, self-depreciating, unkempt, potty-mouthed and magnetic, Breitbart was impossible to dislike. He could talk to anybody, and he did. He loved cheesy ’80s music in inverse proportion to the bands’ quality. His poker playing was charmingly abysmal. His wife and enormous brood of kids were radiant. He saw himself as a high school nerd, about to wreak vengeance on the press’s popular kids with his new media plays. I felt not dissimilarly, at the time. We cemented a friendship there, even if it meant occasionally enduring some rant about Al Sharpton. It was one of the happiest periods of my life.

This article in BuzzFeed about Breitbart’s contributions to the Huffington post rings true to me:

“He taught us a lot of things early on,” Peretti said, recalling how Breitbart showed them key features of the media ecosystem. “He explained about looking at the British newspapers late at night because they would sometimes break news before the U.S. papers. He cared about getting links up seconds or minutes faster than other publications and was obsessive about that.”
Breitbart was also a font of ideas, not all of which made it into practice.
“He wanted every commenter to have to pay $1 to comment, and the dollar would go to charity but the user’s true identity would be authenticated through a credit card,” Peretti recalled, noting that the idea prefigures current attempts to authenticate identity online.
He also proposed “a phone number where celebrities could call in and leave voice blogs that would automatically appear on the site ,” Peretti recalled. “He wanted that built before launch, and launch was four days away.”
His creativity, as many who worked with him know, could be hard to contain.
“He was just incredibly difficult to have in the office – he was totally ADD and would jump from idea to idea. He would spend hours playing fantasy baseball during the day. He was incredibly good at fantasy baseball,” Peretti said, but then started talking to another Huffington Post employee about starting a fantasy baseball company amid the Huffington Post launch.

Posted in Andrew Breitbart | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Andrew Breitbart Was 43

The Anatomy Of A Panic Attack

Are there places you can’t go in case you have a panic attack? Are there things you can’t do for fear of panic?

A few Alexander Technique lessons will help most people to let go of panic attacks.

I had a girlfriend who could not go to courts or hospitals for fear of a panic attack.

“If you’d free your neck and think up, you wouldn’t have a panic attack,” I said to her.

My advice did not go over well. She just got mad at me.

It’s always easier to get mad at others rather than to take responsibility for your own situation.

So what happens when you have a panic attack?

The first thing that you notice will be a flooding sensation of fear, but you won’t get this without certain physiological responses to a stimulus.

If your neck is free and you have upward direction through your torso, in other words, if you are buoyant, you won’t be disabled by fear. To truly experience fear, you have to tighten and to compress your neck and to pull down and in on yourself. As you tighten up and compress, shoving your anxiety into your gut where the bile will likely flow up in reaction to your clenching, you’ll be flooded by fear and other unpleasant symptoms such as a racing heart.

With your neck and torso tight and your shoulders hunched, your lungs will have less room to expand and breath will become more difficult.

By contrast, if you refuse to tighten and to compress your neck, and instead expand into activity, your torso lengthening and widening and your face free of compression and your limbs loose, you’ll be tranquil. You won’t be a drama queen. You won’t need to demand that everybody pay attention to you and submit to your emotional and physiological blackmail.

Wikipedia says: “First, there is frequently (but not always) the sudden onset of fear with little provoking stimulus. This leads to a release of adrenaline (epinephrine) which brings about the so-called fight-or-flight response wherein the person’s body prepares for strenuous physical activity. This leads to an increased heart rate (tachycardia), rapid breathing (hyperventilation) which may be perceived as shortness of breath (dyspnea), and sweating (which increases grip and aids heat loss). Because strenuous activity rarely ensues, the hyperventilation leads to a drop in carbon dioxide levels in the lungs and then in the blood. This leads to shifts in blood pH (respiratory alkalosis or hypocapnia), which in turn can lead to many other symptoms, such as tingling or numbness, dizziness, burning and lightheadedness. Moreover, the release of adrenaline during a panic attack causes vasoconstriction resulting in slightly less blood flow to the head which causes dizziness and lightheadedness.”

Greg Leake emails: Hi Luke,
I’ ve been keeping up a little with your directions and discussions about the Alexander Technique. I distinctly remember some occasions when proper body mechanics and awareness of the direction of my head helped put some panic attacks in abeyance.

On one occasion I remember looking across to the other side of the ring and not being particularly pleased by what I saw. In addition to having a mean disposition, the gentlemen on the other side of the ring had a washboard stomach, defined pectoral, muscular deltoids and arms, and a bull neck.

As the bell rang and he came forward, I immediately remembered my proper head mechanics. I tucked my chin downward to press against my chest in a cramped position so that I would not be hit in the chin and get knocked out.

With my left foot forward I shuffled forward, with my weight balanced between my forward left foot and the toes of my right foot.

As he began to swing, I felt a rise in tachycardia and a certain amount of hyperventilation, amplified by the mouthpiece clenched between my teeth to prevent those same teeth from being knocked out.

I slipped his left jab to the outside position. This is actually a movement done with the body and the feet, not the head. Now as I was on the outside guard position, my head was in rough proximity to his left elbow. Wishing to encourage him to feel that his head was moving upward and forward, I hit him in the chin with a left uppercut. This encouraged his head to move upward, whereupon i swung my body in an arc and hit him with a right hook in an attempt to remove the head that I had helped to move to a more Alexander-Technique-approved position. As he was now wide open, I hit him with a left hook on the other side of the face, moving from the initial Jack Dempsey combination to a popular Mike Tyson combination.

As he lay on the floor, i began to feel a sense of well-being. My tachycardia and hyperventilation began to diminish because of my proper use of good body mechanics.

Learning to increase body inhibition and placing the head and torso into a constrained position was a big help to me that day, and as a consequence I became a big believer in the proper use of the body to help overcome social awkwardness, inhibition, and physical tension.

Posted in Alexander Technique | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Anatomy Of A Panic Attack

Practicing Massage Requires Good Body Mechanics

In this podcast, Jano Cohen, an Alexander Technique teacher and Massage Therapist in Philadelphia talks to Robert Rickover about ways the Alexander Technique can help Massage Therapists.

Jano: “Practicing massage is an athletic endeavor that requires good body mechanics. In a lot of massage training programs, they teach people how to use their bodies well, but not in the sophisticated way the Alexander Technique offers.”

Robert: “I’ve worked with massage therapists and noticed an over-use of hands, shoulders and arm muscles.”

Jano: “When you allow your whole body to be behind each movement you make, it’s a lot less effort.”

Robert: “There’s a pretty high burn-out rate in that profession.”

Jano: “When people are tense, their joints are often stiff and they can’t listen to what is going on in somebody else’s body. People react to that tense touch by stiffening. So there’s a lack of movement back and forth.”

“When people get help with Alexander Technique, there’s an improved flow in the body. Your touch is much softer and more sensual. When you touch someone that way, they receive a soft sensual touch and are able to relax. The practitioner can hear more and listen deeper into the body. When there’s a block or armoring in the body, it’s harder to hear what is going on but with soft hands, you can penetrate that armor with gentleness and before they know it, they’re already releasing and following.”

Robert: “I’ve noticed that massage therapists tend to lose awareness of themselves and it all goes into their client.”

Jano: “Massage, like Alexander Technique, is a partnership. The client is contributing to the partnership. To help the client, the practitioner must be the best they can be, but also for themselves. You do not need to give up yourself for the other person. This is a boundary issue. Whatever you do in life, it’s important that you stand your own ground and that you care for yourself. It’s a modeling for the other person. It’s also a way of meeting the client as a full self.

“If you degrade your own body and forget about yourself while you work with someone else, that does not help them. It does not bring them into the world in a better way.”

“The way you think about yourself comes across to the other person. When people come to practitioners, they often have transference issues from their parenting. Maybe they’re in a job where somebody is dominating them and they’ve come to expect this from a person of authority.

“An Alexander Technique teacher is not a separate authority but a person offering a facility, not dominating the other person. They’re teaching the person that they can come to the partnership in a safe way. A partnership where there’s less and less tension and people are more open and connecting to each other in a flowing, organic way that does not require force or manipulation or domineering.”

Posted in Alexander Technique | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Practicing Massage Requires Good Body Mechanics

Fear Makes You Contract, Love Makes You Expand

When you’re afraid, you tighten up. The contraction will start in your neck and then spread to the rest of you. You compress, make yourself smaller, less of a target, and go into some version of the fight-or-flight reflex.

When you’re afraid, it will be hard to reach out to others. Your touch will be less pleasant. Your verbal and emotional expression will be curtailed.

By contrast, when you love, you expand. You swell up and take your full space in the world. The neck frees up, the head releases forward and up to take a poised relationship to your spine.

Conversely, when you pull down and in on yourself, you’re going to have more access to the emotions of fear, hatred, sadness and depression. By contrast, when you expand into activity, you’ll have more access to the emotions of joy, love and tranquility.

Every emotion requires a particular alignment of the body. When you use your muscles in a certain way, certain emotions are readily at hand while others are out of touch.

It’s not that emotions, thoughts and muscles are connected but that they are all part of the same thing — you. Your brain is part of your body. What you think affects the degree of muscle tension. Your emotions, thoughts and muscles are constantly affecting each other.

You can take the path of love to expansion or you can expand into love. Or you can lose consciousness of yourself and slip into pulling down and into depression.

Posted in Alexander Technique | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Fear Makes You Contract, Love Makes You Expand