Call of the Shofar is Scientology Without Space Aliens

Steve Sailer: “Recall Werner Erhard, the former car salesman Jack Rosenberg who renamed himself after physicist Werner Heisenberg and West German finance minister Ludwig Erhard. He founded est, the existentialist cult that swept white-collar America in the 1970s. Est was like a new, improved version of Scientology shorn of space aliens. Est was Jean-Paul Sartre’s famous October 1945 lecture to the young intellectuals of Paris telling them that life was meaningless so they had to take responsibility for choosing their own meanings, just remodeled for American regional sales managers.”

Posted in COTS, Cults, Scientology | Comments Off on Call of the Shofar is Scientology Without Space Aliens

Is Call of the Shofar Compatible With Judaism?

Shmuel Pollen, a resident of Morristown who participated in and even led “Call of the Shofar” workshops, reveals what shook him out of the “influence.”

So why the radical change of heart?

It occurred this past Shabbos, when I was having a short, but deep conversation with an elder chassid.

He made a remark in a speech that he gave, that appeared to me to be a slight against Call of the Shofar.

I approached him about it and we quickly got into a philosophical conversation in which I tried to explain the merits of “Shofar philosophy” and how it fits in with Chassidus.

Keep in mind, Shofar does teach extremely deep concepts that do seem quite similar to Chassidus. And they often are found to be much more accessible than what we typically learn (which is a draw for Lubavitchers).

He countered what I was saying with proofs from various places in Tanya. Admittedly, his arguments were dismantling mine.

But I continued to present the other side of the coin, playing devil’s advocate.

This was going on fine, until a certain point in which I explained a particular aspect of what Shofar is trying to accomplish, and suddenly he froze up, and became visibly shaken. He was so upset he didn’t want to talk about it anymore. He came back to me to confirm a few more times that what I had said was actually something that is believed by Shofar attendees.

I confirmed it. Then he said, almost in a panic: “If they do this – it’s a masis umadiach! I can tell you 1,000 percent it’s completely asur to go to such a place.”

It shook me up.

And when I really thought about what he had said, I realized that he was completely right.

It suddenly occurred to me that this organization which seemed benign and elevating, was actually, a threat to our very souls.

Posted in COTS, Cults, Hasidim, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Is Call of the Shofar Compatible With Judaism?

Alexandra Aitken Splits From Her Husband

Alexandra Aitken, Inderjot Singh

Alexandra Aitken, Inderjot Singh

I interviewed my yoga teacher at Yoga West LA, Alexandra Aitken, the British actress, in February of 2009.

The Telegraph reports Oct. 6, 2013:

…Alexandra Aitken’s marriage had hit the rocks, her father has confirmed that that she is living separately from her husband, the Sikh warrior Inderjot Singh.
“I think they are apart,” says Jonathan Aitken, the former Conservative Cabinet minister. “There is uncertainty. She has been in contact with him recently. They are not divorced, but they have, obviously, hit a rocky patch.”
Aitken, who was not able to attend the couple’s 2011 wedding, in a 4am ceremony witnessed by 150 holy men from the Nihang sect, adds, in an interview with the Daily Mail: “They are not, officially, separated, but they are going through a bad patch.”
The 33-year-old former “It girl” stunned her family when she announced in 2010 that she was to be married to Inderjot, swapping the nightclubs of Mayfair for the holy village of Anandpur Sahib, in the Punjab.
She remains devoted to the teachings of Gur Gobind Singh. Aitken discloses that when his daughter returned home this summer she refused to sleep in a bedroom.

From the Mail, Feb. 2, 2011:

For years she had a reputation as a hedonistic party girl. Now Alexandra Aitken, daughter of former government minister Jonathan, has married a devout Sikh and changed religion, too. How did her transformation come about? Here, Alexandra, 30, tells her intriguing story . . .

I looked at Kabbalah — the fashionable offshoot of Judaism — I read about Islam, about Buddhism, but it wasn’t until about four years ago when I went to a Kundalini yoga class in Los ­Angeles, after I moved out there from London, that I started to look at Sikhism.
I’d tried various different types of yoga before, but never Kundalini, which comes from the Sikh tradition and incorporates mantras or prayers into the classes.
The people I met through Kundalini just seemed to be so amazingly happy that I felt compelled to ask why.

…Sikhism. Everything has been a very natural and organic process, things evolved step by step.
Part of that process has been meeting Inderjot Singh, the man I’ve called my husband from the day we met — though of course it’s only just become official.

I first saw him, about a year ago, on the roof of the Golden Temple in Amritsar and just knew we were going to get married.
Six weeks later, I flew back to Los Angeles and we’d still not said a word to each other, but somehow I was in love with him.
I just knew I had to go back to India to find him, so I did. I can’t really explain it. I was just praying he didn’t live in a tent on top of a mountain, because I knew that even if he did I was going to marry him anyway.

Alexandra Aitken, Inderjot Singh

Alexandra Aitken with her father

Alexandra Aitken, Inderjot Singh

Posted in Alexandra Aitken | Comments Off on Alexandra Aitken Splits From Her Husband

Accomplished Public Speakers Tend To Not Move Their Heads

Pedro de Alcantara, an Alexander Technique teacher in Paris, France, talks with Robert Rickover about his concept, the “Simplified Skeleton”, the basis of what have come to be called “Neutral Directions”.”

Pedro: “When most people talk, they move their heads and their necks besides from gesticulating and moving their arms, legs and body. They nod. They say something and the head goes up and down. There are at least three possibilities. You can train yourself to talk without actually moving the skull, where the jaw, tongue, lips, vocal chords, and diaphragm move but the skull stays where it is. Many good singers, actors, politicians, preachers know how to do that. It is very convincing when a speaker can talk without moving the skull. It lends a certain authority to the speaker. It also changes the tone of voice and the timber of the voice.

“Then you can choose to move your skull on the joint between the spine and the skull. You can nod the head a bit but the neck is not affected. You nod with the head, not the neck. Then you can catch yourself moving your neck in space, moving it forward and down. Once you feel the distinction between the three things, they are very different ways of speaking. If you often talk moving your neck and you train yourself to talk without moving your neck, you’ll become a different preacher, speaker, singer, actor. A different set of emotions.”

“Practice talking without moving your neck or watch how people talk on TV. Watch the movie Who’s Afraid of Virginia Wolf? And you’ll see these two great actors, Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor, they talk without moving their skulls. They show strong emotions without nodding with the neck and the emotion and action is more condensed on account of it. If you keep your neck in place with the spine, everything changes — the voice, the emotion, the communication, the force, the personality.”

“Direction works best when it is multi-media, when you use words, thoughts, images, sensations, trigger, symbols, anecdotes, haikus. In that song and dance of directions, you find the one that suits you and gives you that stable neck. You say to yourself, my emotions flow through me to my listeners, but my neck stays.”

Robert: “In my experience, the people to watch are successful politicians. They generally don’t give their necks away. You don’t get elected if you are constantly giving your neck away.”

In this interview, Pedro says: “The Alexander Technique is a way of solving a problem by putting the problem aside and working on yourself instead, focusing on yourself, calming yourself, and opening up your mind. If you do that, most problems disappear.”

Posted in Alexander Technique | Comments Off on Accomplished Public Speakers Tend To Not Move Their Heads

New Developments In The Alexander Technique

Robert Rickover writes:

There have also been dramatic developments in what might be called “Alexander Technique teaching technology”. This started with Alexander Technique spin-offs such as Body Mapping, Posture Release Imagery and Up With Gravity – all of which are easily accessible to members of the general public and which are to a large extent web-based in terms of how people discover and use them.

More recently, several new methods of Alexander Technique directing have emerged, starting with Negative (sometimes called Inhibitory) Directions, which have gained a significant following among Alexander Teachers. In the past few months, Freedom Directions have emerged as a likely successor to Negative Directions – one that is simpler to use, often a bit more effective, and above all, one that students can easily share with others. They can used by pretty much anybody with an interest in learning them. (You can learn about all these and other new developments in Alexander Technique directing at the Alexander Technique Podcast page: New Directions in Alexander Technique Directing.)

As if all that weren’t enough, the web has also provided a new medium for teaching the Technique at a distance: Skype. Of course there is at present no hands-on teaching with Skype, although this seems certain to change as existing new technologies become cheaper and more widely available. Many teachers have successfully used Skype to teach students who would otherwise have no access to a teacher. The new teaching developments mentioned above are fairly easy to convey via Skype.

What this all means is that the “cage” provided by professional Alexander Technique organizations – one that may well have been necessary half a century ago – has now opened wide, allowing new ideas to be quickly and easily tested and propagated throughout the Alexander world without any official involvement or control. Alexander organizations still have important roles, but controlling innovation in Alexander Technique teaching is, in my opinion, no longer one of them.

Posted in Alexander Technique | Comments Off on New Developments In The Alexander Technique

Try To Think Like A Landlord

If you’ve lived in a diverse apartment building, do you truly believe that all groups/races/religions are equally likely to be quiet, civic-minded, law-abiding, respectful of others, reliable with their rent checks, have the same attitude towards trash, recycling and maintaining of public areas, drive similar cars, and throw the same kind of parties (with accompanying externalities)?

If I were a landlord for an apartment building, I might rather rent to female north-east Asians (meaning of Japanese, Chinese or Korean origins) than about anyone else because they are so quiet, responsible, polite, credit-worthy, etc. If peace and quiet were my prime concerns, I might rather rent to Asians than Jews. If my own group were my primary concern, I’d rent to Orthodox Jews. Diversity has some advantages (it is socially cool) but so does homogeneity (it develops social capital).

Jason Richwine wrote:

It was not the kind of message a Harvard seminar expects to hear. Ethnic diversity causes a lot of problems, our guest speaker told us. It reduces interpersonal trust, civic engagement, and charitable giving. It causes us to disengage from society, like turtles shrinking into their shells, reducing our overall quality of life. The more diversity we experience in our lives, the less happy we are.

I came to Harvard to study public policy in the fall of 2004. All of the first-years like me had to take a special seminar class where we would discuss the philosophy of science and the nature of good research. The best class days featured established scholars who would come to present their own papers, which were real-life examples of good research.

The guest speaker who came to discuss diversity was political scientist Robert Putnam, who is something of a celebrity in academic circles. With the publication of his 1995 article “Bowling Alone,” Putnam helped bring the issues of social trust and civic participation to the forefront of social science. His article became a popular book, also called Bowling Alone, in 2000. Written for a general audience, the book chronicled the rapid decline in civic engagement that had taken place in the United States since 1950, and argued that communities without strong social ties are less happy and less successful. The article and the book garnered Putnam numerous media appearances and spawned reams of response articles in academia.

Posted in Race | Comments Off on Try To Think Like A Landlord

Were Blacks Better Off Under Jim Crow Laws?

On Friday, I posted to FB: “Phil Robertson stood tall for his beliefs [about homosexuality] and A&E caved.”

My friend Michael responded: “Phil’s “beliefs” include black people supposedly enjoying living under racist Jim Crow laws.”

Michael, Phil didn’t give any “beliefs” as you describe. He said this: “I never, with my eyes, saw the mistreatment of any black person. Not once. Where we lived was all farmers. The blacks worked for the farmers. I hoed cotton with them. I’m with the blacks, because we’re white trash. We’re going across the field…. They’re singing and happy. I never heard one of them, one black person, say, ‘I tell you what: These doggone white people’—not a word!… Pre-entitlement, pre-welfare, you say: Were they happy? They were godly; they were happy; no one was singing the blues.”

In this GQ interview excerpt, Phil simply described what he saw. That was his experience. But let’s extrapolate out from what Phil Robertson saw to the general condition of blacks in America under Jim Crow and today. The black family under Jim Crow was in better shape than the white family. As the black economist Walter Williams wrote: “In 1960, only 28 percent of black females between the ages of 15 and 44 were never married. Today, it’s 56 percent. In 1940, the illegitimacy rate among blacks was 19 percent, in 1960, 22 percent, and today, it’s 70 percent. Some argue that the state of the black family is the result of the legacy of slavery, discrimination and poverty. That has to be nonsense. A study of 1880 family structure in Philadelphia shows that three-quarters of black families were nuclear families, comprised of two parents and children. In New York City in 1925, 85 percent of kin-related black households had two parents. In fact, according to Herbert Gutman in “The Black Family in Slavery and Freedom: 1750-1925,” “Five in six children under the age of 6 lived with both parents.” ”

So, yes, in some ways blacks in America were happier and better off under Jim Crow laws than they are today under rap culture. Do I want America to go back to Jim Crow culture? No.

In many ways, Gays were better off under a repressive America than under today’s permissive America. Just look at AIDS. AIDS exploded after it became socially acceptable to publicly identify as gay. Black crime rates exploded after the 1960s Civil Rights legislation. South Africa’s average life expectancy has plunged a decade since the end of apartheid. The average black (and white) in South Africa was better off under apartheid than he is today.

In many ways, Jews in America were better off with a mildly anti-semitic America that did not always allow them into certain hotels and country clubs and limited their admission to Ivy League schools because that segregation promoted group cohesion and discouraged inter-marriage and assimilation.

Freedom and equality of opportunity are not always the greatest values.

John* emails:

There are a couple of very important points about Jim Crow laws that are usually ignored by people who view segregation as unspeakably evil. Under segregation, there was generally a thriving black business class who catered to blacks. Once segregation was lifted, and blacks could shop anywhere, some did and that cut into the black owners’ business but whites did not start patronizing black owned establishments. So integration had the unintended consequence of eviscerating black stores (excepting undertakers, barbers and hair salons.)

The other problem arose with school segregation. Within the black community, teachers, administrators and principals formed a respected middle and upper class. When the schools were desegregated, many of the teachers lost their positions. They may have been graduates of Negro teacher’s colleges, but those schools were thought of as inferior to their white counterparts. Black principals were not put in charge of an integrated or white faculty.

This also had the unintended consequence of undermining discipline in the schools. If a kid acted up, the principal and/or teachers knew the family and would speak with the family about the problems with the child. With white teachers and principals, this didn’t apply. They may have held positions of authority, but they didn’t personally know the family or interact in the community in the same way.

On the anniversary of Brown v Board of Education, I read some interviews with prominent blacks who had received education in the segregated south and then were part of the first wave of desegregation. They said that they felt that the education they received from their segregated teachers surpassed what they received in an integrated environment. Some of this may be due to white racism, but at least part of it, is that they could identify more closely with their black teachers and their black teachers understood them better.

If you want to read more about the impact of the Brown case on education, Raymond Wolters, a history professor at the University of Delaware, has written a couple of books about it.

Posted in Blacks, Jews, Race | Comments Off on Were Blacks Better Off Under Jim Crow Laws?

The Layers Of Resentment

Therapist Jerry Wise says: “Your ability to let go of resentment has a lot to do with what you learned in your family of origin.”

Even if we are not conscious of our resentments, they take a toll on us, causing fatigue, obsession, depression, a negative attitude to life, loss of love, emotional distance, reactivity, divorce, and out of control feelings leading to suicide or murder. “Bitterness is resentment on steroids.”

“Our current resentments have a great place to stick when we have unresolved family of origin resentments. They create a flypaper, a sticky substance, for [new] resentments to stick to.”

It can be hard to stop resenting your spouse when that resentment is stuck to a resentment you have to a parent.

“It is important to get under the resentment to the primary feelings of shame, fear and abandonment. Resentment is a secondary emotion.”

Posted in Psychology | Comments Off on The Layers Of Resentment

Do YOU have text claw or iPosture? Expert reveals the 21st century ailments caused by smartphones and tablets

The Daily Mail reports:

Do YOU have text claw or iPosture? Expert reveals the 21st century ailments caused by smartphones and tablets
Smartphone users check their phones 150 times a day on average
Phone addicts are often easily distracted, suffer disrupted sleep, are tempted to lie about their phone use and can become depressed
Overuse of a smartphone can lead to a phobia of being without it, texting while asleep, phantom vibration syndrome and cybersickness
It can also lead to hand, eye and posture problems, say experts

It is easy to get sucked into whatever is absorbing your attention and collapse your whole torso around your interest, but this is rarely to your advantage. A great way of learning about your patterns and letting go of the ones that don’t serve you is through lessons in the Alexander Technique.

Posted in Alexander Technique | Comments Off on Do YOU have text claw or iPosture? Expert reveals the 21st century ailments caused by smartphones and tablets

Was God The First Alexander Technique Teacher?

Throughout the Bible, God berates the Israelites as “stiff-necked” people.

Here are some examples:

Exodus 32, verses 9, 10: The Lord said to Moses, “I see this is a stiff necked people. Now let Me be, that my anger may blaze forth against them and that I may destroy them…”

Deuteronomy 9: verses 13 and 14: “I see that this is a stiff necked people. Let me alone and I will destroy them and blot out their name from under heaven…”

Jeremiah 7, verse 26: “They stiffened their necks, they acted worse than their fathers.”

In Micah 2, verse 3: The Lord says, “I am planning such a misfortune against this clan that you will not be able to free your necks from it. You will not be able to walk erect.”

There are more joints in the neck than anywhere else in the Bible, so Alexander Technique begins with freeing the neck from tension, then directing the head to release forward and up and the back to lengthen and widen.

If the neck is tight, stiff and compressed, the body cannot be free because all those joints in the neck mean that bones are connecting to bones and the compression of a stiff neck is going to ripple throughout the body in layers of constriction.

In this podcast, “Robert Rickover, an Alexander Technique teacher in Lincoln, Nebraska and Toronto, Canada, talks with Amy Ward Brimmer about the phrase “stiff necked people” that appears many times in the Bible and how it relates to Alexander Technique teaching today – which emphasizes the importance of not stiffening your neck.”

Robert: “If you want to change the way you use your body, you’re going to want to pick an intervention point, and the neck is perhaps the key intervention point because it affects everything else in your body.”

“How you manage the weight of your head on top of your body affects everything else in the body.”

Posted in Alexander Technique | Comments Off on Was God The First Alexander Technique Teacher?