We Need To Eroticize Women Of Color

Elliot Rodger didn’t want to be with a woman of color. They disgusted him. He had to have a hot white chick, but hot white chicks are increasingly difficult to land as they are an increasingly smaller percentage of the population.

I know this sounds bad, but I blame the Jews. We have to do a better job on TV of selling to the goyim the benefits of the love of the Mexican woman, the joys of the Filipina, the mysteries of the Chinese lady, etc.

The idea that white women are more desirable than women of color is racist and racism must end with me.

Chaim Amalek: “Mulitcultural, diverse America needs porn that socializes people into identifying with their own kind and then being happy with them as sex partners and spouses. I call it, “Eroticized Homogeneity” A society that treasures its genetic boundaries is a content society. We need to have Hollywood do a better job of eroticizing Women of Color so that this is less apt to happen. And since Hollywood (movies and TV) is in the hands of the Jews and I am Jewish, I’m going to have to fire up my fax machine.”

Posted in Race | Comments Off on We Need To Eroticize Women Of Color

Family Patterns

I notice that when I get around family, we all tend to act according to the patterns we developed decades ago.

As I fly to Australia tonight, I want to see my family with fresh eyes. I want to see if I can let go of my habitual responses that have not served me (or anyone else). If I get frustrated with a situation that I can’t change, I will seek to shift my attitude.

I know I’m a sick puppy. Narcissistic Personality Disorder may well not be curable.

I’m not the same person as when I saw them last. They have all changed in their own ways. I have ten years of psycho-therapy. I can draw on the insights I’ve learned to become a better person. It is time for me to let go of my grudges and to see everyone with fresh eyes.

* Here’s something interesting to consider, this may be your real chance to make a living amends to your family and focus on true hasid – be kind and loving to them no matter what. Show what it means to love free of judgement with compassion kindness and willingness to not engage in anything about you. Think of it as a service trip, how you can serve them every moment in the moment, and when the fear or resentment comes up, rid yourself that is not your primary purpose on this trip, your purpose is to love on them, forgive yourself and them each day, and ask G-d to speak for you before you talk, invite G-d on the trip and into every relationship and encounter – let Him do the work, your job is to keep your opinions to yourself restraint of pen and tongue and you aren’t allowed the luxury of taking their inventory, is it reasonable to expect that they would act differently? Keep your side clean, and focus on service and tzedukah.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on Family Patterns

Santa Barbara killer Elliot Rodger

I’m fascinated by the Santa Barbara killer Elliot Rodger in the same way I’m fascinated, on occasion, by Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh, Mark David Chapman, John Hinckley, etc. I feel like I understand these guys because I share their emptiness and I share their desire to lash out to prove my superiority. Unlike these killers, however, I’ve never had the drive to physically hurt anyone. I’ve never been arrested in my life and I would never allow myself to commit crimes. I have such a shaky sense of self that I couldn’t go on if I did bad things to people. I only survive by picturing myself as a good person, but I know there is great darkness in my soul. I often feel like I’m drowning in shame, and to flee from these intolerable emotions, I’ve developed this false self.

I think a big reason I write so much about predators is that I understand them (not the attraction to prepubescent kids, I don’t get that) and I would act similarly in some circumstances if not for my fears, my morals, my psychology, etc. I certainly know what it feels like to be driven by eroticized rage and when I disconnect from God and people, it floods back.

Like Elliot Rodger, I compensate for my failings by writing endless manifestos and making videos about myself.

I understand people who commit arson. They want the outside world to match their inside world. A couple of times when I was a kid, I set fires in the bush trying to create a conflagration (no harm was done). When I confessed to my best friend Wayne what I had done, he threatened to tell on me if I ever did it again, and so I stopped.

That I understand people who do horrible things does not mean I excuse them. It does not mean I don’t want to see them punished. I support capital punishment for murder, for instance.

My addictions to grandiosity, fantasy, and rage allowed me to survive my childhood, but simultaneously strangled me, so I had to seek help, which I eventually found in Orthodox Judaism, psycho-therapy, Alexander Technique, and 12-step programs. On May 28, I turn 48.

Daniel: “Too bad Elliot Rodgers didn’t have Orthodox Judaism and the Alexander Technique to give him a moral compass and inner peace like our brother Luke. The most havoc Luke could wreak is conducting a panty raid at Bais Yakov.”

Last night, I got flooded by feelings of helpless rage and could not sleep. I turned to all the things I learned about God and about my mind and about shame and rage and the need to let go and to forgive and it did me no good. I was too intensely triggered. After listening to a few hours of lectures on mindful awareness and attunement, my frustration burned out as my exhaustion set in. I got up, showered, ate a bowl of oatmeal and a blueberry smoothie, and started reading the manifesto of the Santa Barbara killer. It frightens me how much I identify with him (except the bits about wanting to physically hurt people).

Daniel: “Wow! He’s like Luke on crack! I wonder if people called him ‘Chinky’.”

Here are some excerpts from the killer’s manifesto:

* After doing a lot of extensive research within the last year, I found out that the sorority with the most beautiful girls is Alpha Phi Sorority. I know exactly where their house is, and I’ve sat outside it in my car to stalk them many times. Alpha Phi sorority is full of hot, beautiful blonde girls; the kind of girls I’ve always desired but was never able to have because they all look down on me.

They are all spoiled, heartless, wicked bitches. They think they are superior to me, and if I ever tried to ask one on a date, they would reject me cruelly.

* How could an inferior, ugly black boy be able to get a white girl and not me? I am beautiful, and I am half white myself. I am descended from British aristocracy. He is descended from slaves. I deserve it more. I tried not to believe his foul words, but they were already said, and it was hard to erase from my mind. If this is actually true, if this ugly black filth was able to have sex with a blonde white girl at the age of thirteen while I’ve had to suffer virginity all my life, then this just proves how ridiculous the female gender is. They would give themselves to this filthy scum, but they reject ME? The injustice!

* So far, Santa Barbara was not working. I dreaded how horrible it would be to continue suffering my miserable, lonely, celibate life in such a beautiful city where everyone else experienced the pleasures of sex and love. That would be the darkest hell. And that was exactly what was in store for me.

* On one of my very last days as a teenager, as I was sitting at my usual place at the food court outside Domino’s, I saw a sight that shattered my heart to pieces. A tall, blonde, jock-type guy walked into one of the restaurants, and at his side was one of the sexiest girls I had ever seen. She too was tall and blonde. They were both taller than me, and they kissed each other passionately. They made me feel so inferior and worthless and small. I glared at them with intense hatred as I sat by myself in my lonely misery. I could never have a girl like that. The sight was burned into my memory, and it caused a scar that will haunt me forever.

* Because of my father’s acquisition of a new girlfriend, my little mind got the impression that my father was a man that women found attractive, as he was able to find a new girlfriend in such a short period of time from divorcing my mother. I subconsciously held him in higher regard because of this. It is very interesting how this phenomenon works… that males who can easily find female mates garner more respect from their fellow men, even children. How ironic is it that my father, one of those men who could easily find a girlfriend, has a son who would struggle all his life to find a girlfriend.

* By nature, I am a very jealous person, and at the age of nine my jealous nature sprung to the surface. During play dates, [a friend] would have other friends over as well, and I would feel very jealous and upset when he paid more attention to them. Feeling left out, I would find a quiet corner and start crying.

* I was different because I am of mixed race. I am half White, half Asian, and this made me different from the normal fully-white kids that I was trying to fit in with.

Mixed race kids have it harder. In Elliot’s case, he was neither white nor asian but a mutt.

It’s a shame Elliot Rodger couldn’t find a starter girlfriend, such as a Filipina. They’ve often been nice to me, even without pay.

Chaim Amalek: As their relative proportion of the population has declines, white women have gotten to feel more valuable and thus have become pickier, even to the extent of pricing themselves out of the market. Asian women, on the other hand, are trying to break into the market. But the racial dynamic there might be brutal if you are the son of such a pairing.

David Tainsh: Asian are more fun anyway….

Chaim Amalek: But what about the next generation, especially the males?

Jenny Pool: Depends on where you live. Asian chicks chase rich Jews in California, and score. Not here [Vegas].

Chaim Amalek: Also, in general ____ chicks chase rich ___ in ___ and score.

Jenny Pool: Vegas. They won’t even hire Asian broads at the high dollar strip clubs. Can’t make money off ’em.

They’re a dime a dozen at all the cheap handjob stroke joints down the block.

Chaim Amalek: There is a granularity to the human race that our elites have declared off limits for further discussion

Jenny Pool: I dig nerdy guys. I’ve never been attracted to beefcaked, ‘roid-heads.

Chaim Amalek: LV is a strange place in so many ways. An [edited this to read “pretty, white”] 18-21 year old girl can make six figures without doing much more than taking off her clothes. I suspect the guys that age don’t have any option that pays that well. Also, other than gambling and drinking what do people do there?

Jenny Pool: You’re kidding, right? Who do you think owns these clubs, runs this shit? It’s not pretty white broads. One of the most lucrative female strip clubs in town is owned by homosexual Jewish lawyer.

According to the SPLC: “On Monday of this week, Rodger wrote in a thread at BodyBuilding.com that ‘It’s been my life struggle to get a beautiful, white girl.'”

Luke: Many Steve Sailer readers are picking on Elliot Rodger for being 22 and in community college. What a loser! I was still in community college at age 22. I took a year off after high school to work in Australia, and then I worked various jobs while going to Sierra Community College from 1985-1988, eventually getting into UCLA in the fall of 1988 with $30,000 in the bank.

Here are some posts from Steve Sailer’s commenters:

* He shoulda forgot about the blondes and got himself an Asian girl. Something is better than nothing.

* He should have studied science or engineering, fields where one is not expected to have fun. At least then he would have had an excuse for being alone and miserable all the time.

* It’s always a bad idea to try to read broad societal implications into the actions of one mentally disturbed individual.

* The (largely mistaken) belief that other people are doing it like rabbits causes a lot of mental anguish, especially among guys.

* Why was this idiot aiming for the most beautiful buxom blonde women? He could’ve settled for an Asian girl.

* Paradoxically, egalitarianism breeds
supremacism if the society is celebrity-centric.

If egalis preach that all are equal and there are no innate differences UNDER A HUMANISTIC SOCIAL ORDER, most people might accept the basic necessities and humble joys of life.

But if egalis preach that all are equal and there are no innate differences UNDER A CELEBRITISTIC/NARCISSISTIC
SOCIAL ORDER, then everyone will expect to be equally as cool, hip, sexy, and ‘popular’ as the famous stars and cool kids.

The video is a strange mix of ‘leftist’ egalitarianism and ‘rightist’ supremacism.

“I wasn’t equally loved and admired, so I hate the world for such inequality (and failure to deliver the hope/promise of equal happiness for all), and to prove my superior worth over you all, I will kill.”

* The problem is that in today’s liberal sexual market the differences between winners and losers is much more pronounced, and also rubbed inthe face of the losers. In the past overall sluttiness was much lower due to fears of impregnation and limiting of mixing of the sexes, plus people were prudes so they kept their conquests to themselves.

The loser anger is understandable, but often these rejected omegas forget that they themselves do the exact same to a lot of fatties and ugly women. Can’t blame hot chicks for rejecting you if you keep rejecting fatties.

The PUA solution need not work for everyone. The other option is to accept reality for what it is, accept you aren’t going to be rolling in tail like Charlie Sheen, and see what else you enjoy doing in life. Megalomania and narcissism need to meet an end at some point, and usually that point is when your desires bump up against society’s willingness to acquiesce to them.

* Killing for fame is as old as Herostratus and the Greeks. That is something that has not changed. What has changed is the shuffling off of power to various bloated, incompetent, politic-ridden, bureaucratic government agencies.

Suppose this happened in say, Northfield Minnesota in the 1870’s. With repeating rifles and handguns, not a strange supposition.

Now imagine what would have happened to such a man. If he had not shot himself, he’d have been strung up and his body exhibited to anyone who any ideas of copying him. His family would have been persecuted and had to move, change their names, and live in poverty.

Social control, such as it was, lived with ordinary people collectively and spontaneously, not in remote, politic-driven bureaucracies that move like a glacier.

That this guy’s father was the Director of Hunger Games astonishes me. Most Hollywood spawn get various jobs with their fathers in the industry, and pull far above their weight otherwise.

My guess, is that the father was estranged/divorced from the guy’s mother, did not take an active role in his life, and was not available as a prop to get this kid some sex and a relationship.

Ickiness? That certainly did not stop the phenomena that Steve Sailer termed “Chicks Dig Chechens!” (tm Steve Sailer). Women certainly don’t find murder, brutality, even applied to other women a turn-off. Whitey Bulger, John Gotti, and the Petersons Drew and Scott, did not lack for female companionship.

Our female oriented consumer culture puts an absolute premium on social dominance and aggression. At one end, the typical Black rapper or athlete or such; and on the other end the nerdy, physically slight White or (worse) Asian guy.

PUA stuff CAN help guys like this, but they need to get over the “wrongness” of women wanting what they want. Do you blame the Ocean for being wet, and dangerous? Women are what they are, if a guy wants to have sex he better be what they WANT. Not what they say, but their revealed preference.

Is it much harder for a physically slight, Asian/White-Asian guy to succeed with women? Sure. But it can be done. Bruce Lee found it hard to deter people picking on him, its one reason he worked out so brutally (to get the “hooded” back look) which may have led to his stroke. But the good news is that social dominance is less reliant on looks alone (they do play a part certainly) and charisma, performance, status, achievement, fame, etc. can play a part. A significant part.

Look at say, Robert Downey Jr. Physically he’s much slighter in build than say, Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth, or WWE Wrestler Batista. But socially and charisma wise, he owns each guy.

* These are crimes of social striving.

All the mass murders like this in the past few years are perpetrated by (largely) white or partially white guys.

Looking into their histories a bit, it becomes clear that there is a familiar pattern. Since early youth they have been continually rejected socially. It may be funny looks or ADD or apergers etc. They are usually way above average intelligence and are quite clear in perceiving their continual rejection.

So, what do you do when your body tells you its time to find a mate and your intellect tells you that there is no way in hell this is going to happen? Well a childhood and adolescence of continual rejection will cause anyone to give up on human relationships and crush out any residual empathy towards other human beings.

For these guys, the one meaningful act they can do is to find dignity in rebellion. And mass murder is rebellion in spades. With the influences of video games and movies that glorify and desensitize killing with modern weapons, it is easy to connect the dots an see how mass murders could be conceived and planned.

* Actually, based on his internet posting trail, he was racist against non-whites. In his forum posts he complains about and disparages non-white men, mainly blacks and Indians apparently, for being around white women. He also complains about and disparages an Asian guy for talking to a white woman.

* If girls don’t like you back, you can:
a) keep talking to more of them, eventually one may like you
b) lower your standards and start talking to fat chicks
c) give up and watch porn

The reality is that the only dating market in which 5’6″ half-Asian men will have success is over in Asia.

Shooting some sorority women won’t solve anything.

* The people at blame for this is his father and mother.

Both people rejected their own race, and thus imparted a deep psychological sickness into their son.

You’ve been warned.

* And this goes to show why a rational society shouldn’t leave its boys’ sexual debuts to the haphazard when it becomes clear that they can’t figure out how to negotiate and close the deals with girls at developmentally appropriate ages. They should receive some kind of intervention like coaching in dating skills and even working with sexual surrogates if necessary.

For example, you can find sex therapists in Southern California who work with sexual surrogates. I happen to know a therapist like that in Orange County through my connections in the cryonics community. He told me one time that many of his clients come from the Orthodox Jewish community, men who marry well into adulthood without sexual experience who discover that they have trouble functioning sexually with their wives. They rationalize using surrogates as analogous to medical treatment which will help them with their religiously understood sexual obligations in marriage. I can see something similar to help sexually inexperienced men around the age of 20 before the hardcore alienation from womankind can develop.

As for seeing prostitutes, that doesn’t really solve the problem. Prostitutes don’t teach men an adult skill set for dealing with women competently in relationships.

* Rodger should have counted his blessings and thought himself lucky that as a priapic 22 year old denied access to women through the Oedipus like structure of modern society, (which despite all precitable howls to the contrary is as strong now as it was 40,000 years ago), that the marvels of modern technology and the skill and hard work of scientists and technologists has delivered the internet up to his gilded generation. Like penicillin, vaccination, automobiles or central heating, it’s just another one of this artful breakthroughs that have made life on earth for mortals that bit more agreeable.

Rodger’s plea, although selfish and self indulgent is the perpetual plea of frustrated male youth everywhere, from Philip Roth, who was mentioned on iSteve earlier, to more familiarly Beavis and Butthead. What the misguided and angry 22 year old really needed was a fatherly hand clapped on his shoulder and a straighforward pep talk, plus a nice little portable tablet computer together with a Brazzers subscription. Yes, Brazzers and the like, I would have thought, through the miracle of modern science, would have somewhat allieviated the tumescence and frustration of Rodger.

For this reason, I’m one who will never slag off internet porn, a double-edged (pork) sword, if there ever was one. Put it this way, internet porn is merely the universe as 22 year old kids want it to be.

* This seems to be a case of Tragic Mulatto with an Asian twist. Human beings like to belong to a group based on shared identity. It doesn’t need to be race
based but needs to be based on something. It appears that he didn’t fit in with guys, with Whites or Asians or anyone.
His posts on anonymous internet boards were combative. Usually folks like this can find one community to feel like they belonged yet he couldn’t even pull that off.

STEVE SAILER WRITES:

From the Santa Barbara shooter’s manifesto:
“I’m going to enter the hottest sorority house of UCSB and I will slaughter every single spoilt, stuck-up, blonde s**t that I see inside there.”

The top sorority house at UC Santa Barbara is pretty much the top of the blonde heap in America…

So, targeting for slaughter this sorority is an extremely intentional racial hate crime. But how much do you think we’re going to hear about that? As Sapir and Whorf might have said, if a term doesn’t exist in our vocabulary, it’s hard to think about the concept.

BARRY EMAILS LUKE: “Fascinating piece on the “killing blondes” shooting. I think you are right about the beneficial effects of internet porn for sex starved young men. While not therapeutic exactly I think it helps to open their eyes about the fundamentally coarse nature of women and helps to demystify them. I also agree that the shooter’s parents did not help – I’ve known a couple of mixed race kids and its a terrible cross to bear.”

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on Santa Barbara killer Elliot Rodger

Jewish Art Critics Vs Norman Rockwell

Few if any great artists (painter, sculptor etc) were Jewish but most of the dominant art critics have been Jewish as Jews tend to have superior verbal skills but not as many skills of dexterity.

Steve Sailer wrote in 2010:

Norman Rockwell died 32 years ago. And Mr. Gopnik’s views have been representative of elite discourse for longer than that, burying Rockwell’s reputation under a barrage of anger. But, Gopnik, even though he’s on the winning side, is still furious that his victory isn’t total.

If you want a picture of Mr. Gopnik’s ideal future, imagine a boot stamping on Norman Rockwell’s face — forever…

[Gopnik:]”America isn’t about Rockwell’s one-note image of it — or anyone else’s. This country is about a game-changing guarantee that equal room will be made for Latino socialists, disgruntled lesbian spinsters, foul-mouthed Jewish comics and even, dare I say it, for metrosexual half-Canadian art critics with a fondness for offal, spinets and kilts.”

To be frank, if a WASP critic displayed this much overt ethno-cultural animus toward a Jewish painter, he would be unemployable at the Washington Post.

Dennis Prager is a big fan of Norman Rockwell but Prager isn’t an art critic.

Sailer writes in 2014: “The role of simple junior high school-style ethnic animosity in the decades of trashing Rockwell should not be overlooked.”

Posted in Art | Comments Off on Jewish Art Critics Vs Norman Rockwell

Stuff White People Like

A friend at last night’s Billy Joel concert at the Hollywood Bowl reports the sold-out crowd was 99% white, drunk, stoned, happy, no cursing, no fighting.

A white attorney friend tells me about how his dinner was ruined at a posh restaurant the other night when four black gangbangers showed up and were loudly cursing and nobody in the white crowd, including the workers, wanted to ask them to quiet down or to leave.

Joe says: “I wish one could google where the natives are mostly white, the economy is strong, and the locals are genuinely friendly towards outsiders like me.”

Steve Sailer: From Ira Glass’s This American Life on NPR, an African-American expatriate living in Paris recalls an early lesson learned in France:
Janet Mcdonald says:
I was going to the movies with a friend of mine from Yale who is black also. And there was a long line. And we were like, let’s jump the line. These white people, they’re going to be scared of us. We’ll just go and jump the line. We’ll get to the front of the line. So, of course, you know, we walked up to the front of the line, like, yeah, you want to try me? I’m black. That usually works in New York.
These people were ready to rip our hair out. And they were white. I couldn’t believe it. And they were like, in French, what are you doing? The line starts back there. You can’t just walk to the front of the line. They were, like, ready to kick our butts. I was shocked. I’m like, these are white people, and they’re not scared of us?
That’s when I realized I wasn’t in Kansas anymore. And I liked it. I mean, of course, it was kind of humiliating, because you know, we’re supposed to be the intimidating, scary ones. And then all these French bitches in high heels were threatening us. And they were in our faces. And it made me realize that the whole black-white game just doesn’t work outside of the United States.
Because white people aren’t afraid of you here. And at the same time, they don’t hate you, because that sort of goes together. So I’ll take it. I’ll wait on line. Now I don’t dare jump lines. So that opened my eyes.

Posted in Race | Comments Off on Stuff White People Like

The Connection Between National IQ, Prosperity & Freedom

Two psychologists write: Traditional economic theories stress the relevance of political, institutional, geographic, and historical factors for economic growth. In contrast, human-capital theories suggest that peoples’ competences, mediated by technological progress, are the deciding factor in a nation’s wealth. Using three large-scale assessments, we calculated cognitive-competence sums for the mean and for upper- and lower-level groups for 90 countries and compared the influence of each group’s intellectual ability on gross domestic product. In our cross-national analyses, we applied different statistical methods (path analyses, bootstrapping) and measures developed by different research groups to various country samples and historical periods. Our results underscore the decisive relevance of cognitive ability—particularly of an intellectual class with high cognitive ability and accomplishments in science, technology, engineering, and math—for national wealth. Furthermore, this group’s cognitive ability predicts the quality of economic and political institutions, which further determines the economic affluence of the nation. Cognitive resources enable the evolution of capitalism and the rise of wealth.

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on The Connection Between National IQ, Prosperity & Freedom

Asserting Your Group Identity

Jews have no problem building up the Jewish character of a neighborhood. They will refuse to sell their homes to non-Jews for instance as a tactic in increasing the number of Jews in an area. So why don’t whites do the same? Jews will often want to live in Jewish neighborhoods. Why shouldn’t whites want to live in white neighborhoods by deliberately not selling their homes to outsiders?

Steve Sailer writes:

A recurrent theme here at iSteve is that Americans should pay careful, respectful attention to how New Yorkers have rebuilt their city in recent decades because there is much that can be learned from New York. Of course, New Yorkers are tireless in offering advice to the rest of America, but the public verbiage seldom has much to do with what actually works in New York. For example …

When I was looking for a job in New York City in 1982, I stayed on 14th Street between 4th and 5th Avenue. The rule of thumb back then about the Lower East Side was that 3rd Avenue was fine, and the west side of 2nd Avenue was okay, but you wouldn’t want to cross 2nd Avenue (unless, I suppose, you were looking to buy drugs). Beyond was, presumably, 1st Avenue and a legendary set of north-south avenues beginning A, B, C known as Alphabet City, but nobody I was staying with was a drug addict so they’d never actually been there.

These days, of course, much is different, for which New York speaker of the Assembly Sheldon Silver can take some of the credit for blocking construction of public housing for Puerto Ricans on the Lower East Side for decades. But while doing so, always make sure to have lined up a hapless shlemiel to be your fall guy when the political winds shift.

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS: “The trick is to make sure that people say Jewish and not White. See, if I say that I am trying to preserve the neighborhood’s Jewish identity, that’s OK. If I say that I am trying to preserve its White identity, that sounds really sinister. Of course, since the overwhelming majority of American Jews are White, I’m also ensuring that the neighborhood stays White, so it’s a two for one deal.”

BIG BILL POSTS: The Jewish community has been gathering money for Rapfogel to help him make restitution for the federal/state poverty money he stole.

That is the definition of chutzpah.

The guy swiped $7M federal and state money that should have gone to poor Jews, yet he and his backers ask that Jews ante up $3.1M so he can make restitution (while keeping all the stuff he bought with the stolen cash!) so the goyim don’t send him to jail.

As best I can figure out the Jewish logic is “he really stole from the government, not us Jews, so let’s not be too hard on the guy. Other than being a huge thief he really is a pretty good Jew.”

STEVE SAILER WRITES:

Whenever you mention that African-Americans seem to have brought with them some sub-Saharan African behavioral patterns, it’s now traditional for somebody to say: “Africans are the most genetically diverse people on earth” and/or references to the dazzling diversity of African cultures. In reality, with famous exceptions like the Bushmen and Pygmies, Africa is a fairly homogeneous place for its vast size. As genetic anthropologist L.L. Cavalli-Sforza summed up in his 1994 book The History and Geography of Human Genes, “… differences between most sub-Saharan Africans other than Khoisan and Pygmies seem rather small.” Similarly, sub-Saharan cultures tend to be variations on a rather limited number of themes.

Posted in Blacks, Jews, Steve Sailer, Whites | Comments Off on Asserting Your Group Identity

The UCLA Psychiatrist & The Dalai Lama

During a dialogue with the Dalai Lama, UCLA psychiatrist Daniel Siegel said (as recounted in disc one of his The Wise Heart and the Mind series): “When we’re threatened, you accentuate the difference between who is similar to you and who is dissimilar to you. Who’s in the in-group and who’s in the out-group. You take the people in the in-group, and you take better care of them. You take people in the out-group, and you treat them more harshly. That we know from a lot of studies.

“The second studies show that when you are shown pictures of people who are not like you, the circuitry of compassion, empathy, you shut off those circuits. I said to His Holiness, how can we awaken ourselves as a global community during this time of threat, so we can stop shutting off our circuits of compassion and keep them alive?

“He said…you cannot have compassion for your enemy from the biased form of compassion, only from the unbiased kind. He said, I’m a Buddhist, so I know a Buddhist practice [that promotes unlimited compassion]. He said it has got to be a mind training to open up this unlimited compassion… It is up to you scientists to come up with a secular ethic to promote more compassion in the world.”

Posted in Dalai Lama, Daniel Siegel, Race | Comments Off on The UCLA Psychiatrist & The Dalai Lama

Where Am I Better Than The Average Mexican?

My friend says my self-deprecating humor (telling everyone I’m a felon, that I trade my services for vegie macs) lowers my esteem in other’s eyes and he’s recommending I type up a letter of recommendation for myself that he’ll sign and I’ll carry around with me and hand out.

Chaim Amalek: Why deprecate yourself when by conventional standards, you don’t have much value to begin with? Successful people boast, not self-deprecate. Copy them, even if you have to fake it.

How much self deprecation goes on a communal Jewish awards dinners? Or at your orthodox shul? This is an affectation that should be left to the goyim.

I want you to write a list of ten things at which you are better than the average Mexican.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on Where Am I Better Than The Average Mexican?

Is Martin Luther King A Great American Hero?

A friend wrote:

While I was in Alabama (Hoover), I made a point to visit Brimingham and walk through the grounds/parks where the civil rights movement had so many moments.

Dr. King called for non-violent civil disobedience, in refusing to accept the separate-yet-equal-doctrine and arguing that people have a moral responsibility to break unjust laws. Writing letters on the margins of found papers, the imprisoned King wrote his letters essentially addressing the white clergymen that were upset of the criticisms (they felt it was an inappropriate attack on them, even though they did nothing to stem the tide of racial attacks) and that argued no demonstrations should occur

In the brilliant letter, King wrote that “You deplore the demonstrations taking place in Birmingham. But your statement, I am sorry to say, fails to express a similar concern for the conditions that brought about the demonstrations.”

The attached pictures are statues memorializing the subsequent protests. The police unleashed dogs and water cannons on the non-violent protestors, including children….harming many of them. Four months later, Klan members bombed the 16th Street Baptist Church (pictured), killing 4 young girls.

Walking through the downtown area where all this occurred, and visiting the various monuments (albeit with a really crappy camera), was very emotional. It was a great and valuable learning experience. There are still many lessons that can be learned from this today; to apply to our personal lives and our communal lives.

Conservatives have long been skeptical of Martin Luther King while neo-conservatives have regarded him highly.

Martin Luther King, in my view, is a good litmus test of whether or not someone is truly conservative. Anyone who thinks Martin Luther King is an American hero is not conservative and is sadly misguided on important matters. I would not trust the person’s judgment on politics.

Dennis Prager often praises Martin Luther King. On Jan. 27, 2011, Dennis’s Facebook page said: “Celebrate Martin Luther King day today by reading and sharing the profound ‘Letter from a Birmingham Jail.’ Print it out and put it on the kitchen table for the kids to read. It’s an important national holiday. Put the flag out and talk about the Reverend and read excerpts at dinner tonight.”
National Review through the 1970s supported white segregation around the world while Dennis has always called such segregation “evil”, including in his first edition of Ultimate Issues.
Will Herberg, who Prager often cites about Judaism, blamed Martin Luther King for the 1965 Los Angeles Riots, writing in the Sept. 7, 1965 National Review:

For years now, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King and his associates have been deliberately undermining the foundations of internal order in this country. With their rabble-rousing demagoguery, they have been cracking the ‘cake of custom’ that holds us together. With their doctrine of ‘civil disobedience’ they have been teaching hundreds of thousands of Negroes…that it is perfectly all right to break the law and defy constituted authority if you are a Negro-with-a-grievance… And they have done more than talk. They have on occasion after occasion, in almost every part of the country, called out their mobs on the streets, promoted ‘school strikes’ sit-ins, lie-ins, in explicit violation of the law and in explicit violation of the public authority. They have taught anarchy and chaos by word and deed.

In its August 24, 1957 issue, National Review’s editorialized against giving blacks the right to vote because it would threaten civilization in the South:

The central question that emerges… is whether the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not prevail numerically? The sobering answer is Yes–the White community is so entitled because, for the time being, it is the advanced race. It is not easy, and it is unpleasant, to adduce statistics evidencing the cultural superiority of White over Negro: but it is a fact that obtrudes, one that cannot be hidden by ever-so-busy egalitarians and anthropologists.
National Review believes that the South’s premises are correct… It is more important for the community, anywhere in the world, to affirm and live by civilized standards, than to bow to the demands of the numerical majority.

The South confronts one grave moral challenge. It must not exploit the fact of Negro backwardness to preserve the Negro as a servile class… Let the South never permit itself to do this. So long as it is merely asserting the right to impose superior mores for whatever period it takes to effect a genuine cultural equality between the races, and so long as it does so by humane and charitable means, the South is in step with civilization, as is the Congress that permits it to function.

Sam M. Jones wrote for National Review (NR) in 1957 that “the problem of school integration in the nation’s capital may be eventually solved by the steady migration of the white population out of the District of Columbia.” Jones cited IQ differences, “a white average ranging from 105 to 111 and a Negro average of 87 to 89…. Data on juvenile delinquency…revealed a marked increase in truancy, theft, vandalism and sex-offenses in integrated schools. Dances and dramatic presentations have been quietly given up by most high schools. Senior and junior class plays have been discontinued. Inter-racial fights are frequent and constant vigilance is required to prevent molestation or attempted molestation of white girls by Negro boys or girls. In contrast, the schools outside the integrated neighborhoods have no more such problems than they had four years ago.”

On the the tenth anniversary of Brown, NR editorialized June 2, 1964:

But whatever the exact net result in the restricted field of school desegregation, what a price we are paying for Brown! It would be ridiculous to hold the Supreme Court solely to blame for the ludicrously named ‘civil rights movement’–that is, the Negro revolt . . . . But the Court carries its share of the blame. Its decrees, beginning with Brown, have on the one hand encouraged the least responsible of the Negro leaders in the course of extra-legal and illegal struggle that we now witness around us… Brown, as National Review declared many years ago, was bad law and bad sociology. We are now tasting its bitter fruits. Race relations in the country are ten times worse than in 1954.

In the Nov. 2, 1957 issue, classicist Revilo Oliver reviewed Ashley Montagu’s Man: His First Million Years:

Dr. Montagu, who composed the UNESCO Statement on Race, has again skillfully trimmed the facts of anthropology to fit the Liberal propaganda line. Every anthropologist knows, for example, that aborigines in Australia propagated their species for a hundred thousand years without ever suspecting that pregnancy might be a consequence of sexual intercourse. Equally striking evidence of intellectual capacity is provided by the many peoples that never discovered how to kindle a fire or plant a seed. But Dr. Montagu, after making a great show of cautious objectivity, proclaims that ‘anthropologists are unable to find any evidence’ of ‘significant differences in mental capacity’ between ‘ethnic groups.’ If you can tell such whoppers with a straight face, you too can ask the ‘United Nations’ to recognize your right to largesse from the pockets of American taxpayers.

In 1979, William Buckley said about Martin Luther King: “When it was black men persecuting white or black men–in the Congo, for instance–he was strangely silent on the issue of human rights. The human rights of Chinese, or of Caucasians living behind the Iron Curtain never appeared to move him.”

American Renaissance magazine said in 2007: “Once the ancient distinction between black and white was broken down, the 1960s made short work of virtually every other distinction whites had taken for granted: man and woman, heterosexual and homosexual, normal and perverted, diligence and sloth, health and sickness, good and bad.”

American Renaissance magazine published in 2009:

In the minds of many, King towers above other Americans as a distinguished orator and writer, but this short, 5’6½” man often stole the words of others. People believe he was a Christian, but he doubted some of the fundamentals of the faith. Our country honors King, but he worked closely with Communists who aimed to destroy it. He denied racial differences, but fought for racial favoritism in the form of quotas. He claimed to be for freedom, but he wanted to force people to associate with each other and he promoted the redistribution of wealth in the form of reparations for slavery.

Jared Taylor wrote in 2012:

In the late 1990s, the [National Review] magazine was saying sensible things about immigration, multiculturalism, and even race and IQ. It defended The Bell Curve, called for serious immigration reform and published Philippe Rushton. This was too much for the NR’s founder, William Buckley, who removed the two men most responsible for honesty. He forced out Editor John O’Sullivan in December 1997, and in February 1998 exiled Senior Editor Peter Brimelow to the powerless position of Contributing Editor. Mr. O’Sullivan’s replacement was none other than the Mr. Lowry who now finds Mr. Derbyshire’s work “nasty and indefensible.”

In an Apr. 2, 2013 column praising the greatness of the Bible, Dennis Prager included Martin Luther King in the same sentence as George Washington and Abraham Lincoln:

It was this book that guided every one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, including those described as “deists.” It is the book that formed the foundational values of every major American university. It is the book from which every morally great American from George Washington to Abraham Lincoln to the Rev. (yes, “the Reverend,” almost always omitted today in favor of his secular credential, “Dr.”) Martin Luther King, Jr., got his values.

It is values, not genetics, that account for white and asian accomplishment, according to Prager. Apr. 22, 2014, Dennis wrote:

In colleges throughout America, students are taught to have disdain for the white race…
For example, from the day they enter college, many students are taught about white privilege — how innately advantaged white students (and all other whites are). Last week, the president of Western Washington University posed the question on the university’s website: “How do we make sure that in future years we are not as white as we are today?”

Imagine if the president of the University of California at Berkeley had posed the question, “How do we make sure that in future years we are not as Asian as we are today?”

Inner city young blacks who work hard in school are routinely chastised by other black youth for “acting white.”

Regarding white privilege, last year, three academics at the University of Rhode Island wrote in The Chronicle of Higher Education:

“The American Psychological Association’s educational goals for the psychology major include sociocultural and international awareness, with learning outcomes regarding mastery of concepts related to power and privilege. Other professional organizations, including the American Sociological Association, have developed similar learning goals for teaching in higher education. Instructors have been charged with teaching their white students to understand their own privileged positions in society relative to those of marginalized groups.”

The key point here is that the word “values” never appears. Instead of asking what values made America’s Founders great, the left asks what race, gender and class privileges enabled those men to found America. Instead of asking what values does the white majority (or, for that matter, on some campuses, the Asian majority) live by in order to succeed, and how can we help inculcate those values among more less successful people of all racial and ethnic groups, the left asks what privileges do whites have that enable them to get into colleges and graduate at a higher rate than blacks and Latinos.

The undermining of the very concept of values was starkly made clear last month at a national inter-college debate tournament.

As reported in the Atlantic last week:

“On March 24, 2014 at the Cross Examination Debate Association (CEDA) Championships at Indiana University, two Towson University students, Ameena Ruffin and Korey Johnson, became the first African-American women to win a national college debate tournament, for which the resolution asked whether the U.S. president’s war powers should be restricted. Rather than address the resolution straight on, Ruffin and Johnson, along with other teams of African-Americans, attacked its premise. The more pressing issue, they argued, is how the U.S. government is at war with poor black communities.”

In the final round, Ruffin and Johnson squared off against Rashid Campbell and George Lee from the University of Oklahoma, two highly accomplished African-American debaters with distinctive dreadlocks and dashikis. Over four hours, the two teams engaged in a heated discussion of concepts like ‘nigga authenticity’ and performed hip-hop and spoken-word poetry in the traditional timed format. At one point during Lee’s rebuttal, the clock ran out but he refused to yield the floor. ‘F— the time!’ he yelled.

In a national intercollegiate debate contest, a black debating team won by transforming the topic of the debate, one that that had nothing to do with race, into a race question.

But to object to this, or to argue that a team might be disqualified for yelling “f— the time” when told it had gone over the time limit, or to ask what performing hip-hop has to do with the topic “whether the U.S. president’s war powers should be restricted” — is now deemed to act white.

Apr. 22, 2014, Dennis said: “The American dream, the American value system, the Judeo-Christian value system is that race does not mean anything. It is the only moral belief. The Left has picked up where racial fascism left off.”

“The answer to the racism of the ’30s, ’40s, and ’50s, was to end racism, not to institute it in a different form.”

“Why would I want to answer negative racism with affirmative racism? You have the same treatment of all people irrespective of color. The only answer to racism is to be color-blind. When you are not color-blind, you are racist. Well-intentioned racism is not better than ill-intentioned racism.”

May 14, 2014, Dennis said: “We’re told about old white men. The bane of society. Guess who supports the arts? Old white men. As they move on, who’s going to support the arts. Boy, is this country going to long for old white men one day, especially left-wing institutions, all supported by them.”

“Old white males should go on strike. See what happens to the institutions of America. To the museums. To the orchestras. To the ballets. To the operas. To the colleges. Who do you think gives to all these endowments? Who do you think buys the tickets to these [classical music] concerts? Last time I was at Disney Hall, it didn’t look all that multi-racial and multi-ethnic to me. Pretty much all old white males and females. Maybe the group they love to attack has done some good for society or is that racist? Whenever the Left uses ‘racist’, it means that they don’t have an argument.”

“These WASP males made the greatest country in the world. It had nothing to do with their color. They could have been BASPs — Black Anglo-Saxon Protestants. But they weren’t. You are only allowed to crap on WASPs. If you say anything good, you’re called a racist.”
“You can have this stupidity about white privilege but you can’t have white contributions. Can you imagine that? White contributions. Which do you think has been greater?”

“Why are Nigerians among the most successful Americans? What privilege did they have? What privilege did Koreans have to make such success in one generation?”

Posted in Blacks, Dennis Prager, Martin Luther King | Comments Off on Is Martin Luther King A Great American Hero?