March 30, 2015 ‘The ugly manifestations of resurgent neo-fascism’ Luke Ford No sacred cows.

‘The ugly manifestations of resurgent neo-fascism’

Posted on March 30, 2015 by Luke Ford

I have once again personally witnessed the ugly manifestations of resurgent neo-fascism in the Baltic countries during the past 10 days.
Last Wednesday some 1,500 Lithuanians participated in a march organised by the Union of Nationalist Youth down the main avenue of Vilnius to mark Independence Day.
On Monday, approximately the same number of Latvians gathered in the centre of Riga to honour Latvian SS veterans who fought for a victory of the Third Reich in the Second World War.
The sights and sounds at each of these events were difficult to stomach, and conjured up other scenes, when the ideological forefathers of the marchers ruled the streets of these two capitals and were active participants in the annihilation of Lithuanian and Latvian Jewry.
These marches highlight the two major themes of current Baltic right-wing discontent. The first is a total lack of tolerance for the local minorities, whether it is Poles, Jews, or Russians. “Lithuania for Lithuanians” was the dominant slogan in Vilnius.
In Riga, the hostility towards Russians and Jews was explicitly expressed in signs, comments, and accusations. Two of the more unpleasant encounters I experienced at the march were with an elderly Latvian who insisted that “all Jews are murderers”, and that it was Jews who were responsible for the collapse of the banks.
An elderly woman kept on shouting at me about thousands of murdered Latvian children ostensibly killed by Jewish Communists.
The second theme is related to the ongoing systematic efforts in post-Communist Eastern Europe, but especially in the Baltics, to rewrite the history of the war and the Holocaust in order to minimise or hide the crimes of local Nazi collaborators and promote the canard of equivalency between Nazi and Communist crimes.
In Riga the march seeks to portray the Latvian SS veterans as heroic freedom fighters who paved the way for current independence, a thesis with three basic flaws.
First, the Nazis had absolutely no intention of ever granting independence to any of the Baltic states, regardless of the military contribution of the locals.
So the irony is that today’s independent Latvia could never have been established had the Third Reich won the war, a goal which these SS Waffen veterans sought to achieve.
The second point is that fighting for a victory of the most genocidal regime in history is hardly a criteria for the status of heroes under any circumstances.
It is important to note that although the Latvian SS Legion itself was not involved in Holocaust crimes, among these soldiers were quite a few who prior to joining the Waffen-SS had actively participated in the mass murder of Latvian Jewry and thousands of foreign Jews deported to Latvia to be murdered.
In Vilnius, that theme was reflected by a slew of Lithuanian swastikas worn by the marchers and a large, black SS flag prominently flown.
Probably the best way to convey the dangers posed by these events on the one hand, and the utter sense of disgust I felt to watch these spectacles on the main avenues of European Union member states – ostensibly committed to human rights and tolerance – on the other, is to return to my encounter with the Latvian who was convinced that all Jews were murderers.
Totally exasperated by his senseless rantings, I asked him whether, had he been able, he would have joined the infamous Latvian Arajs Kommando, which murdered tens of thousands of Jews in Latvia and later in Belarus. He replied immediately, without batting an eyelash, in the affirmative.

Notice how Efraim Zuroff’s emotional reactions dominate his article along with his tossing of slurs.

The idea that different groups have different interests is totally foreign to him. The interests of Lithuanians differ from the interests of Jews and Russians.

Every strongly identifying in-group has hostility towards outsiders, whether that in-group is gays, Jews, blacks, Chinese, Muslims or Lithuanians.

Every form of nationalism has a victim narrative and every victim narrative contains a nationalism. This is as true for Jews as it is for Lithuanians.

Efraim Zuroff completely lacks empathy for non-Jewish closely identifying in-groups.

Dr. Zuroff writes: “The sights and sounds at each of these events were difficult to stomach…”

All marches by tight in-groups who have clashing interests with one’s own in-group are difficult to stomach. I don’t think Nazis and Muslims and Palestinians are thrilled when they are forced to watch Jews marching.

Dr. Zuroff writes: “…the canard of equivalency between Nazi and Communist crimes.”

Why is it a canard? Communism slaughtered far more people than Nazism though over a longer period of time. Jews played a major role as Stalin’s willing executioners. Jews helped carry out Stalin’s genocides. Why exactly are Nazi crimes worse than communist crimes? Dr. Zuroff never bothers to make the case for his questionable assertions.

Dr. Zuroff writes: “First, the Nazis had absolutely no intention of ever granting independence to any of the Baltic states, regardless of the military contribution of the locals.”

Yeah, well, every group with spirit wants to dominate the world because if your group don’t dominate the world, another group will and they will likely oppress you. Much of the time, life is kill or be killed. You either expand your territory or others will attack you and try to take your territory and rape your women.

From Wikipedia’s entry on Jane Goodall:

Goodall also found an aggressive side of chimpanzee nature at Gombe Stream. She discovered that chimps will systematically hunt and eat smaller primates such as colobus monkeys.[17] Goodall watched a hunting group isolate a colobus monkey high in a tree, block all possible exits, then one chimpanzee climbed up and captured and killed the colobus.[20] The others then each took parts of the carcass, sharing with other members of the troop in response to begging behaviours.[20] The chimps at Gombe kill and eat as much as one-third of the colobus population in the park each year.[17] This alone was a major scientific find which challenged previous conceptions of chimpanzee diet and behaviour.
But perhaps more startling, and disturbing, was the tendency for aggression and violence within chimpanzee troops. Goodall observed dominant females deliberately killing the young of other females in the troop to maintain their dominance,[17] sometimes going as far as cannibalism.[18] She says of this revelation, “During the first ten years of the study I had believed […] that the Gombe chimpanzees were, for the most part, rather nicer than human beings. […] Then suddenly we found that chimpanzees could be brutal—that they, like us, had a darker side to their nature.”[18] She described the 1974–1978 Gombe Chimpanzee War in her memoir, Through a Window: My Thirty Years with the Chimpanzees of Gombe. Her findings revolutionised contemporary knowledge of chimpanzee behaviour, and were further evidence of the social similarities between humans and chimpanzees, albeit in a much darker manner.

So, that the Nazis weren’t planning on giving independence to the Baltic states is not a shocker. Independence usually has to be seized by force.

Dr. Zuroff writes: “The second point is that fighting for a victory of the most genocidal regime in history is hardly a criteria for the status of heroes under any circumstances.”

It is not at all clear the Nazis were the most genocidal regime in history. Mao was responsible for about 70 million deaths, far outweighing the total Nazi death toll. Stalin killed more people than Hitler.

Dr. Zuroff writes: “It is important to note that although the Latvian SS Legion itself was not involved in Holocaust crimes, among these soldiers were quite a few who prior to joining the Waffen-SS had actively participated in the mass murder of Latvian Jewry and thousands of foreign Jews deported to Latvia to be murdered.”

Yeah, well, lots of Jews participated in Stalin’s genocides of the Cossacks and the Ukrainians. So what? Should Jews who had nothing to do with those slaughters walk around with guilt today?

The Lithuanian who said all Jews were murderers is no more shocking than the widely held belief that all Muslims are terrorists and that all blacks are criminals. When a tiny proportion of a people does horrible things, such as Jews pushing communism or German carrying out genocide or Muslims crashing planes, then it will come naturally to paint black a whole group.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Fascism | Comments Off

Jews & Drugs

Posted on March 30, 2015 by Luke Ford

A goy tells me: “My personal experiences with Jews has been largely positive except I find their community, at least the secular ones, to have a problem with drug issues. Most of my friends who are Jewish have had issues with drugs in their history, some have even OD’d and are not around anymore and I have noticed a lot of drug dealers among hippies to be Jewish. I’m not sure its done intentionally to be subversive, it seems more just related to the fact Jews have been historically involved with trade. Also I notice all this drug stuff in Hollywood. Secular Jewish culture has a problem with drug abuse I think.”

Compared to the Seventh-Day Adventists I knew growing up, non-Orthodox Jews are much more hedonistic, promiscuous and drug taking.

I hate drugs, including marijuana, because they turn a large percentage of people who take them into losers.

I hate alcohol as well. I hate being around drunks. I refuse to be around people who take drugs.

Posted in Drugs, Jews | Comments Off

Wiesenthal Center Denounces Attempt by Russian Rodina Party to Join Forces With Western European Neo-Nazis and Fascists

Posted on March 30, 2015 by Luke Ford

From Wiesenthal.com:

Jerusalem-The Simon Wiesenthal Center today denounced a Russian international conference convened by the Rodina party (the Russian National Patriotic Union) to establish a pan-European movement to lobby for Russia’s interests with the participation of West European neo-Nazis and fascists. In a statement issued here by its director of Eastern European Affairs, Dr. Efraim Zuroff, the Center harshly criticized the participation of German Udo Voigt of the extreme right National Democratic Party in addition to representatives of Greek Golden Dawn and the founder of the Italian Fascist movement Roberto Fiore, as well as representatives from extreme right-wing parties in Great Britain, Austria, Sweden, Belgium, Denmark and Spain.
According to Zuroff:
“How can Russia, which prides itself on its staunch anti-fascist tradition and its significant role in the defeat in World War II of Nazi Germany, permit such a conference to take place with the participation of some of the worst of Hitler’s heirs? Such behavior is the antithesis of the traditional Russian opposition to Nazism and fascism and is an insult to the memory of the Red Army soldiers who sacrificed their lives to defeat the Third Reich.”

Notice how the first instinct of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, and of organized Jewry in general, is to hurl slurs (such as “Hitler’s heirs”) and to try to ban speech they don’t like.

The New York Times reported March 22, 2015:

ST. PETERSBURG, Russia — A motley crew of representatives of fringe right-wing political organizations in Europe and the United States used a conference here on Sunday to denounce what they called the degradation of white, Christian traditions in the West. Their hosts used the conference to advance Russia’s effort to lure political allies of any stripe.
Railing against same-sex marriage, immigration, New York financiers, radical Islam and globalization, among other targets, one speaker after another lauded Russia and President Vladimir V. Putin as a pillar of robust, conservative, even manly values.
Mr. Putin has for some time sought international influence by casting Russia as the global guardian of traditional mores. Yet the effort has acquired new urgency, as Moscow seeks to undermine support in Europe for economic sanctions and other policies meant to isolate Moscow over its aggressive actions against Ukraine…
Jared Taylor, who runs a website called American Renaissance, said the descendants of white Europeans risked being swept away by a wave of Africans, Central Americans and Asians. The United States, which he said worshiped diversity rather than Christianity, “is the greatest enemy of tradition everywhere.”

Jared Taylor writes:

On March 22, I addressed the Russian International Conservative Forum, held in Saint Petersburg. Its purpose was to provide a forum for politicians and thinkers united in their support of national traditions and in opposition to globalism. There was a strong sentiment throughout the meeting of support for Russian sovereignty and European national independence in the face of pressure from the United States. As Yury Luybomirsky of the Russian National Cultural Center explained at the beginning of the meeting, the goal of all the participants was “to preserve national identity and culture,” and that independence from outside pressure and influence was essential for that purpose.
This was not a meeting that went unopposed. Demonstrators protested outside the conference site, and the meeting had to end early because of a telephoned bomb threat.
The meeting may have been an unprecedented assembly of European “far-right” groups, including Forza Nuova (New Force) of Italy, the National Independence Party of Finland, the Attack Party of Bulgaria, Golden Dawn of Greece, the National Democratic Party of Germany, and the newly-organized European group, the Alliance for Peace and Freedom. These parties have been tarred with the extremist labels, but are all dedicated to preserving European and national traditions.
Russia was represented by such groups as the Russian Imperial Movement, New Russia, and the editor of nationalist magazine Russian Observer. There was also a contingent of Cossacks, dressed in traditional military uniforms. The Russians strongly supported the effort to establish autonomous regions in Eastern Ukraine.
There were at least 30 speakers, all of whom gave remarks of about 10 minutes each. Most were in Russian, but the conference provided headsets for simultaneous interpretation into English. Here is a sampling.
Georgios Epitideios of Golden Dawn pointed out that 10 percent of the population of Greece is now composed of illegal immigrants, and that a mass influx of foreigners jeopardized national identity. He denounced the Greek government’s efforts–including imprisonment of party leaders–to “exterminate our movement.” He said that Golden Dawn opposes European sanctions against Russia and noted the common orthodox faith of Greeks and Russians.
Mikhail Remizo of the Russian Institute of National Strategy emphasized that Russia and Bulgaria would never join the European Union, which is in favor of globalization and opposes “the national project.” He also noted that Chinese economic pressure can be added to American political bullying as a growing threat to European autonomy. He argued that a healthy middle class was vital to national identity, and that the post-crisis collapse of the middle class is a grave concern for all patriots.
Ironically, he said, nationalists fighting globalization must have a global strategy. By this he meant that those who believe in national identity must cooperate as widely as possible. It is the Right and not the Left, he added, that will fight the leveling forces of globalization and defend the traditions and culture of the West. He concluded by quoting Arnold Toynbee–“Civilizations are not murdered; they commit suicide”–noting that the West is approaching this point.
Sam Dickson from the United States also spoke, and introduced himself as a representative of the real Americans who believe in peace with all countries and who want to preserve our race and civilization. He began with the old proverb, “one hundred repetitions make one truth:” the defenders of the truth can be overwhelmed by repeated lies.
He argued that one of the current lies is that Russia is a danger to the United States. He pointed out that it shares no borders with us, and has never fought a war with the United States. Indeed, it was Vladimir Putin’s solution to the problem of chemical weapons in Syria that spared the United States the costs and the casualties of military operations against Syria. He also praised Mr. Putin for encouraging higher birthrates in the West, while American rulers work for our dispossession by promoting Third-World immigration.
Davidson Yukka of the National Independence Party of Finland pointed out that in some respects Russia is freer than any other country in Europe. Some forms of speech have come under attack in countries such as Finland, where it is possible to lose one’s job for criticizing homosexuals or opposing gay marriage. “The European Union is an idea that has failed,” he said, “but the politicians are still riding this dead horse.” He concluded that if our enemies abuse and denounce us it is because we are right.

When you compare the writings of Jared Taylor with the writings of Efraim Zuroff, who strikes you as more profound, more humane, and more right? To me, the answer is clearly Jared.

Posted in Fascism, Jared Taylor, Russia, Simon Wiesenthal | Comments Off

Efraim Zuroff: One man’s journey to the heartland of fascism

Posted on March 30, 2015 by Luke Ford

Efraim Zuroff is a Simon Wiesenthal Center Nazi hunter and historian.

For ethno-nationalists, Israel is a shining light of what a determined people can accomplish, but I guess if Jews develop an ethno-state, that’s a good thing, but if goyim attempt to similarly develop their own ethno-states, that’s bad.

“Fascist” is usually thrown around as a slur, but I fail to see why it is inherently any less valid than any other form of government. Anthropologist Peter Frost writes: “Fascism is defined here in opposition to liberalism, the belief that individuals should be free and self-determining.”

If you ask Google, “Is Israel fascist?”, you will get over a million results. Here’s the first result, a book review of the 2013 book Goliath: Life and Loathing in Greater Israel:

Max Blumenthal’s sprawling portrait of contemporary Israel is far more a work of journalism than political theory. It largely avoids sustained argument or analysis, allowing its main points to be inferred through the words of Israelis and Palestinians and short contemporary or historical descriptions, presented in several dozen vignette-like chapters. This is nonetheless a bold and shocking book, presenting persuasively a major theoretical and polemical argument about Israel almost completely at odds with the image most Americans have of it.
In Goliath, America’s foremost partner in the Middle East is not the humanistic and ever resourceful “David” using guile to vanquish surrounding brutes, but a militaristic and racist state whose electoral majorities have set it on a trajectory towards fascism, if it isn’t there already. Even those generally well-informed about Israel and its occupation of the Palestinian territories will have their views challenged by Blumenthal’s sharp eye and deadpan factual presentations.

For many people, simply asking if Israel is a fascist state is an obscenity because the Nazis were fascist. But the Nazis also believed in gravity. Should Jews then deny gravity?

Efraim Zuroff writes: “This year marks the 25th anniversary of Baltic independence and more than a decade of full membership in the European Union and NATO. If the assumption was that those developments would cure Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian society from the scourges of fascism, racism, and anti-Semitism, the events of the past month clearly show that these plagues have not been eradicated.”

Has racism and fascism been eradicated from the Jewish state or does that not matter?

“The first question in that regard is the legal status of these marches… Local courts decided to allow the marches on the basis of freedom of speech, and all attempts to have them banned, or at least moved out of the city center, including my appeals this year to the mayors of both Lithuanian cities, have not achieved any practical results.”

Great, another Jew against free speech.

You can tell he’s an insecure type by insisting on the title of “Dr” in front of his name, even though he is a PhD and not a medical doctor. PhDs don’t normally demand the honorific “Dr” in front of their names.

“Two dangerous themes were dominant in practically every event. The first was the open hostility toward local minorities – Poles, Russians and Jews in Lithuania, the latter two in Latvia and Estonia.”

Good thing you don’t find hostility to minorities in the Jewish state, right?

Haaretz in 2004: “Christians in Jerusalem want Jews to stop spitting on them.”

You won’t find any condemnation by the Simon Wiesenthal Center of this spitting by Jews on Christians.

I sometimes think what would I do if I had the opportunity to earn hundreds of thousands of dollars a year working for the Simon Wiesenthal Center churning out anti-Gentile propaganda. I hope I would have the integrity to choose poverty and truth rather than evil and wealth.

“The only good news was that for the first time since Faina Kukliansky assumed the post of Chairperson of the Lithuanian Jewish community, she issued a statement denouncing the march in Vilnius (after initially ignoring the one in Kaunas), and several community officials participated in our protest. There was only silence from the Jewish communities of Latvia and Estonia, as well as from the Israeli embassies in Vilnius, Riga and Helsinki.”

Perhaps the Jews who live in the Baltics see it as a bad idea to needlessly antagonize their neighbors who are only pursuing their ethnic self-interest akin to the ways that Jews often pursue their interests.

Posted in Fascism, Israel, Simon Wiesenthal | Comments Off

What’s With Latinos On Drugs Running Across Freeways?

Posted on March 30, 2015 by Luke Ford

I have this anecdotal impression of various young male latinos getting nailed running across freeways while high just as I have an anecdotal impression of Chinese students getting killed by blacks outside USC.

In both circumstances, I have the impression that the victims did not understand the danger they faced (for latinos, it was the power of the drugs, and for the foreign Chinese, it was not realizing how dangerous the streets are around USC).

From the Los Angeles Times: “A 19-year-old UC Berkeley student who went missing early Saturday near USC was struck and killed on the 10 Freeway, authorities said Monday after linking the two incidents.

Eloi Vasquez — whose disappearance spawned a city-wide search as his family pleaded for the public’s help — had been last seen leaving a fraternity party around 1:30 a.m. Saturday, but an hour after bidding his friends farewell, the California Highway Patrol said he tried running across the eastbound lanes of the freeway east of the Vermont Avenue exit.”

Posted in Latino | Comments Off

Are Whites Hopeless?

Posted on March 30, 2015 by Luke Ford

Keith emails: I am a white. Have read a little bit of white nationalism. But one thing has to be mentioned about why whites are experiencing predation against them by blacks. Its because over the centuries whites have been pruning themselves of their aggressive breeds through: needless wars, psychiatric confinement, and through the criminal justice system. You can trace this back to medieval europe when they had all sorts of strange punishments for relatively minor offenses.

And so if we look at why whites are being gradually exterminated and dominated by non-whites is because they have literally castrated themselves by locking up all their “nuts”.

Jews are socially dominant because they have a higher rate of mental illness among them. Jews are known for being crazy. There are statistics and old news articles from the early 1900’s that talk about jews having higher rates of mental illness. To be totally 100% sane means to be tame and docile. Crazy means untamed and there are different levels of crazy with some people being crazy but allowed to exist within society and some crazy people that are not allowed to exist in society.

If you look at south africa the black social class that is responsible for fostering a connection to the ancestors and thus a sense of ethnic identity are the schizophrenic shamans. But whites have been locking up their schizophrenics for centuries so it is not surprising they have lost a sense of kin-identity and a sense of connection to the ancestors.

Black people by white standards are literally crazy and mentally ill. However they are allowed to get away with it because it is considered part of their culture.

So I think what we are witnessing is just darwinian selection unfolding and their is nothing that can be done about it. When a race breeds itself to be a bunch eloi they should not be surprised when they become dominated by a race of morlocks(time machine reference hg wells). In other words the white race is hopeless. It does not make sense for a white to base his or her tribal affiliation based on their race. White people do not function as a tribe and those whites who treat the white race as their tribe end up getting attacked by other whites. So white nationalism is not rational. Race realism is rational but not white nationalism.

We shouldn’t be surprised when racial selection that occurred over the course of over a thousand years to make whites more tame and docile results in other ethnic and racial groups becoming dominant over whites or preying upon whites. It is nature. And what this also implies is that there is no hope for whites. You literally cannot fix something that is the result of over a thousand years of breeding selection. You just can’t. It’s like explaining to a rabbit that the wolf is the predator. What is the rabbit going to do about it?

>>And yet 100 years ago, WASPs ruled the world.

Well I think there is something to be said for whites using various institutions and social shaming in order to make their race more tame. That situation may not account for everything that has happened to us and nature is often nuanced and complex. So you do bring up a good point about WASPs having ruled the world 100 years ago. The British ruling class is known for being eccentric though and the British Empire provided an escape route for people who may have been rough around the edges.

I also read an article once that talked about how British psychiatry had a reputation for being slightly more lenient than American psychiatry. I just find it odd how we can discuss so much stuff like jews and blacks and social class and on and on and yet there is very little discussion among any of these race realist blogs about what impact psychiatry has had on our race. It’s as if we are supposed to treat psychiatry as some sort of unquestionable force of nature. But does an unquestionable force of nature one minute declare homosexuality a mental illness and the next minute say it isn’t?

Plus you have the world wars that destroyed many of our best warriors and our most nationalistic people.

But why did our global dominance end? I’m not sure the theory I proposed accounts for it entirely, I do think the theory I proposed has a lot to do with our current situation… but as to why our global dominance ended…

Part of it may have something to do with whites are uncomfortable with power for its own sake. The British needed some sort of “white mans burden” thing to justify having an empire. So even though they were “masters of the world” they were still operating according according to a servant ethic of needing to serve the world in some ways. They never valued themselves enough to be comfortable with simply being served by the world. So in a sense they were pursuing dominance from a domesticated standpoint and one cant hold onto power from that standpoint.

The idea above is basically something Ilana Mercer, the South African jewish lady who writes on the black issue, was talking about.

The idea of whites being committed though to a servant ethic ties into the domestication policies it pursues on itself, the ones I mentioned regarding psychiatry, incarceration, social shaming, sending the warriors to foreign lands, etc.

Whites are basically a slave race and it has revealed itself to be uncomfortable with holding power. And so it should not be surprised if someone who is comfortable holding power decides to hold onto power in its stead.

But how did this race come to power? I think the non-servile elements of the white race managed to achieve certain things despite the nature of the rest of the whites. But ultimately the bulk of the white race had its will made manifest and this is why we see whites being relegated to a humiliated sort of flunky status today. Because this is what whites want. This is why white people on the BBC are always traveling around helping Africans. They are flunkies. These people are not the master race (if there is such a thing).

I don’t foresee one race becoming dominant over the entire world though.

Posted in Jews, Whites | Comments Off

Jews, Judaism & Racism

Posted on March 30, 2015 by Luke Ford

Jazz musician and philosopher, the ex-Israeli Gilad Atzmon says:

Jewish power is the ability to silence criticism of Jewish power…

There is no doubt that Judaism, the Talmud and the Torah contain some devastatingly crude and even inhumane verses and teachings. And yet, traditionally Rabbinical Judaism was very effective in suppressing any manifestation of Jewish collective goy hatred. If Rabbinical Jews were supremacist, as some may forcefully argue, they were also timid. They segregated themselves and, largely kept their anti Goy attitude to themselves.

This changed radically with Jewish secularization. The Godless Jew transformed choseness into a form of a racially driven, tribal privilege. Yuri Slezkine in his invaluable book, ‘The Jewish Century,’ confirms that Jews were ‘Stalin’s willing executioners,’ in the Holodomor, the systematic deadly starvation of millions of Ukrainians in the early 1930s. The demography of the Spanish International Brigade is also revealing. 25% of the Brigade’s combatants were Jewish. Yiddish was the Brigade’s Lingua Franca. We have to ask what is it that motivated these young revolutionaries to fight Catholic Spain? Was it really a battle against Fascism, was Franco a Fascist? Why did they burn so many churches, after all, one would expect these Jewish revolutionaries to first combat rabbinical tyranny and the synagogues. Just a few years later, in 1948, the Nakba – once again, a collective of secular socialist Zionist Jews engaged in a systematic racially motivated ethnic cleansing of Palestine.

The Jews who perpetrated these colossal crimes against humanity were not rabbinical or religious; they were Godless and succumbed to left ideology…

For some time, France has been dominated by a forceful Jewish lobby (CRIF) that has been able to determine the boundaries of discussion as well as freedom in general. It is interesting to examine the treacherous role of the current socialist government in that respect. In some of my recent writing I argue that both Jewish and Left politics contain an element of animosity towards working class people. Jews are generally fearful of the Working Class because it is always that class that turns against them. The Left is also dotted with antagonism towards working people (those who are now reduced into a Workless Class), because of the embarrassing fact that the working people have never joined the promised revolution. In France we see a strong bond between the uniquely unpopular socialist government and a tribal lobby group that is concerned solely with Jewish interests. How embarrassing…

Jewish power is not a Zionist phenomenon. In fact, it is mostly sustained by the Left, by Chomsky type activists, Democracy Now and to a far lesser extent Norman Finkelstein whom I appreciate as an intellectual (though I hardly agree with him on anything). The tactic is obvious. We are pushed to operate within a given discourse that contains some clear boundaries. We are restricted by terminology that is designed to block real scrutiny of the most troubling issues and conceal the truth…

I think that belonging is inherent to human nature and it takes different shapes at different times. I believe that racism and nationalism have been replaced by ID politics. We are trained to talk ‘as a’- as a Jew, as a black, as a gay, as a disabled person, and the forms of these sectarian political structures are very interesting…

We always have to ask ourselves, who benefits? Don’t we want to be Americans or French again? Or do we prefer to operate within marginal sectarian cosmopolitan ID settings? I am not sure. Again, if health, education and labour are at the core of a healthy society, ID politics operates as a clear obstacle. It prevents us from dealing with ‘real issues.’ We discuss gay marriage and anti-Semitism instead of building factories, hospitals and schools…

It may be possible that Jewish power will be restricted in the near future. It may even be possible that some future Jewish suffering is inevitable and this is, of course, unfortunate. I am confident that the Jewish elite is not going to be affected by such circumstances. If anything, they will be the first to benefit from any such a development. Ask yourself how many Rothschild died in the holocaust? Would Israel have been established without the Shoah? Would the Jews be as powerful without the Holocaust? These are open questions and in order to understand Jewish power we must engage in these topics and grasp once and for all the sophistication of the Jewish tribal matrix, the way in which it evolves and so on…

Posted in Israel, Jews | Comments Off

Family Values

Posted on March 30, 2015 by Luke Ford

Tina posts: This is their way of dancing I guess. My daughter is half puerto rican and asian. And no way she is going to grind on her cousins like this. This leads to sexual intentions. My ex dance to this type of music with his cousins. I don’t like it when I see it. He told me when he was young, his cousin asked to suck his penis. Latino girls say this is ok and they do it to their family? Then go grind on your fathers then….it’s sad to see their own families grinding on eachother, and their excuse……”we’re brought up that way”. Any human being would know this is wrong.

Posted in Dance, Latino | Comments Off

A Great Testosterone Story

Posted on March 30, 2015 by Luke Ford

A friend says: I know this guy

Idiot liberal

He was talking about his father

His father went to the doctor

They diagnosed him with “too much testosterone”

So he started taking these pills

And the guy was elated because his father apparently stopped watching Fox News – which he used to watch fervently

And he turned into a liberal!!!

I don’t find that funny. I find it disturbing.

It’s very dystopian

He took the femininity pills and they emasculated him!!

Robbed him of his manhood and his rational will

Um it’s terrifying

And sad

People buy into that stuff

Who decides who had too much testosterone?

* A husband I know gets sick and his wife asks him, “Can you increase your disability policy?”

From a male perspective, women can seem terribly unromantic and pragmatic. They often don’t pause much before moving on to their next meal ticket.

I keep explaining to men, “Women aren’t bad because of their pragmatism. That’s just how they’ve evolved to survive, to deal with bigger dangerous men by trickery and deceit.”

* I wonder if God was sending me a message by giving me a traffic ticket last week outside the Museum of Tolerance? Perhaps the road I’ve been traveling on of late is the wrong one and I need to instead use my talents promoting diversity and multiculturalism?

* Why do people immediately assume I have lots to say about suicidal beta males like the German Wings pilot and German Wings pilot and Elliot Rodger types?”>Elliot Rodger types?

Posted in Testosterone | Comments Off

Black Guy Hates Free Speech

Posted on March 30, 2015 by Luke Ford

Barrett Holmes Pitner writes: Regardless of how repugnant we all may find the n-word to be, it should be clear to any rational person that this scandal isn’t about a black person saying “my nigga” in a rap lyric or even about a white youth saying it to his friends. This is about a group of youths gregariously chanting that those “niggers” should be hanging from trees. One usage expresses the support of murder, and one does not. This is how free speech transitions to hate speech and then to dangerous speech.

America needs to start a debate between free, hate and dangerous speech. Internationally this discussion has progressed further than here. In America the emphasis has been on hate crimes, which advocates for increased punishment for crimes perpetrated because of hatred of another’s race, religion or sexual orientation. Internationally the focus has shifted towards dangerous speech, which is a form of hate speech that clearly correlates to negative outcomes.

Susan Benesch, the Director of the Dangerous Speech Project in her paper, “Countering Dangerous Speech: New Ideas for Genocide Prevention,” says that “by teaching people to view other human beings as less than human, and as mortal threats, thought leaders can make atrocities seem acceptable — and even necessary, as a form of collective self-defense.”

The international emphasis of this discussion is centered around recent genocides and mass killings such as in Rwanda, Srebrenica and during the Holocaust; when the leaders of these atrocities publicized dangerous hate speech to disseminate ideologies of hatred to spur their followers to act, cow bystanders into passivity, and justify their crimes.

The hate speech used in these countries directly correlated to the commission of atrocities, and this discussion of dangerous speech could be beneficial in the United States. As a nation, America has tried to progress from the horrors of slavery, Jim Crow, lynchings and racial inequality while maintaining noble principles of free speech. Even now, the rather tepid addition of hate crime legislation constantly meets with resistance from many conservative lawmakers and parts of society. They argue a crime is a crime no matter its motives, and justice must be evenly meted by law enforcement. Coincidentally, the Department of Justice has just published its report finding that the Ferguson police department — and one would imagine many others in the country — is dangerously biased in its policing and treatment of its black citizens. It makes one wonder if any of the cops charged with protecting black communities were ever members of an organization or community that was comfortable referring to black Americans as niggers? The fraternity scandal demonstrates how racist, oppressive and dangerous traditions are still alive and well, and may contribute to the continued oppression of minorities.

Posted in Blacks, Censorship | Comments Off