Don’t show what you don’t want others to look at

Ladies, it does not seem complicated to me. Don’t show off your body if you don’t want guys staring. I often see professional women wearing ridiculously short skirts and then tugging them down all our therapy session. Don’t wear clothing that sexualizes you if you don’t want that attention. Don’t act and speak in ways that sexualize you if you don’t want that attention.

WP: It’s safe to say that Science Magazine’s career-advice column doesn’t usually scorch up the Internet.

But a well-known molecular biologist and senior faculty member at Caltech touched a raw nerve when a young researcher asked for advice about handling her adviser’s repeated attempts, whenever they met in his office, to peer down her shirt.

“As long as your adviser does not move on to other advances, I suggest you put up with it, with good humor if you can,” wrote Alice Huang, a regular columnist for Science, whose profile says she has always advocated for women in the field.

Posted in Feminism, Harassment, Sex | Comments Off on Don’t show what you don’t want others to look at

Strange Days!

A hot Jewish chick tells me: The strangest thing just happened to me. So I’m at this coffee shop. This really good looking well dressed guy sits next to me and he starts talking to me. I ask what he’s reading and he’s reading david hume. We start talking and we have all these things in common. He studies classics at this elite university and he’s into Roger Scruton. One kicker — HES A MUSLIM FROM IRAN! Why do these things always happen to me?

Luke: You’re a weirdo magnet!

HJC: He asked me out on a date. We’re going on a date…but I can’t MARRY AN IRANIAN MUSLIM.

HJC: “So I’m going to go on a date with that Muslim. I probably shouldn’t bring up race or IQ or skull size right?”

Luke: Of course you should, sort it out right away.

* I don’t care about stupid opinions. I only care about facts and logic I have not previously considered.

* Luke: “Holy moly! She was born in 1991.”
Friend: “You like that low mileage. So new the seat still smells good.”

* My Orthodox friendly female friend says: “I’m wearing pants for the first time in 3 months because I’m going to pick up my motorcycle and of course I see a woman from chabad. It’s just my luck.”

* Asking for a friend: Do nice girls on Tinder tell you right off that you’re handsome, give you their SMS, and then send you a private cam invite? I don’t want to marry a hooker.

Chaim Amalek writes: “Hookers tend to come with lots of stds, mental illness, and every time you take one out in public as your girlfriend there is the heightened chance of humiliation when she runs into an old client.”

* Is it normal on Tinder to have submit your CC information to chat with the girl?

* If I had known dating would get so grim in my 40s, I would have settled down in my 20s.

* Damn! Every girl who pretends to like me on Tinder turns out to be a hooker.

* Report Calls Forced Schooling of Native Canadian Children ‘Cultural Genocide’

Luke: And how would their lives have been without this? Would they have lived longer or better? Were they taken from an earthly paradise?

* When my Mexican friend comes by, I like to flash our gang signs and intone, “Bloods for life! Kill all the Crips! Peace out holmes!”

* Ex Machina: It’s a reactionary movie about female manipulation so they have to use robots.

* So what do you say when you run into a woman from the past and she says, “Do you think I’ve gained any weight?” And you can see the gain everywhere — face, profile, waist, etc.

* I notice a lot of women don’t own a scale and when I try to drag them on one, they accuse me of being unromantic.

* Richard tells the kid on the HBO show Silicon Valley: “Here in Palo Alto, we don’t enjoy all the freedoms you have in China, such as to smoke all day.”

* A girl asks me: “Why is everyone mentally ill? It feels like I meet more people who are mentally ill than people who are not.” Possible answer: The Gene Bomb

* Friend: “Do you agree the Boston bomber should die?”
Luke: “Yes! There’s a long list of people I’d like to see dead.”
Friend: “Make a list! But leave me off.”

* Many Koreans have this notion that if you don’t clean your plate, in the next life, you’ll have to eat all of your leftovers.

* Gents, it is not OK to tell the waitress, “Please lean over so I can see your boobs.” The customer is not always right.

* “AA is not a bridge to a new life. It’s a tunnel to a new program.” (AA)

* In AA, you lock the tiger in the closet. In OA, you have to take the tiger out for a walk three times a day. In DA, you have to walk with the tiger 24/7.

* I walked around UCLA Sunday for old time’s sake. I wanted to hug the Bruin Bear but a long line of Asians beat me to it.

* Upon request, the rav held a class for married men on whether or not **** *** is permitted. (It is but not to completion.) The host of the shiur put up a sign, “Please enter through the back.”

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on Strange Days!

Social Justice Warriors Victorious! Soros’s $33 Mil Paid Off!

Heather MacDonald writes:

The nation’s two-decades-long crime decline may be over. Gun violence in particular is spiraling upward in cities across America. In Baltimore, the most pressing question every morning is how many people were shot the previous night. Gun violence is up more than 60% compared with this time last year, according to Baltimore police, with 32 shootings over Memorial Day weekend. May has been the most violent month the city has seen in 15 years.

In Milwaukee, homicides were up 180% by May 17 over the same period the previous year. Through April, shootings in St. Louis were up 39%, robberies 43%, and homicides 25%. “Crime is the worst I’ve ever seen it,” said St. Louis Alderman Joe Vacarro at a May 7 City Hall hearing.

Murders in Atlanta were up 32% as of mid-May. Shootings in Chicago had increased 24% and homicides 17%. Shootings and other violent felonies in Los Angeles had spiked by 25%; in New York, murder was up nearly 13%, and gun violence 7%.

Those citywide statistics from law-enforcement officials mask even more startling neighborhood-level increases. Shooting incidents are up 500% in an East Harlem precinct compared with last year; in a South Central Los Angeles police division, shooting victims are up 100%.

By contrast, the first six months of 2014 continued a 20-year pattern of growing public safety. Violent crime in the first half of last year dropped 4.6% nationally and property crime was down 7.5%. Though comparable national figures for the first half of 2015 won’t be available for another year, the January through June 2014 crime decline is unlikely to be repeated.

The most plausible explanation of the current surge in lawlessness is the intense agitation against American police departments over the past nine months.

Posted in Crime | Comments Off on Social Justice Warriors Victorious! Soros’s $33 Mil Paid Off!

A Local Twist On The R. Jonathan Rosenblatt Scandal

Y. says: Here is a blog entry by Rabbi Marc Angel about Rabbi Jonathan Rosenblatt.

Angel and Rosenblatt were scholars in residence this past Shavuot, yes, just over a week ago, just blocks apart, at YICC and Beth Jacob, respectively. Kinda funny.

This is not the first time BJ has hosted a soon-to-be-scandalized scholar. In 2000, during the inter-regnum between Rabbi Abner Weiss and Rabbi Steven Weil, Beth Jacob hosted Rabbi Baruch Lanner of NCSY as a scholar in residence. His talks were so well received that he was invited back to serve as Rabbi for the 2000 high holidays. But then the scandalous news was received that he had sexually abused girls and physically abused boys at NCSY. BJ hastily canceled their plans, and ended up hiring some retired fellow from New York at the last minute whose specialty was leading shuls “in transition” between rabbis. His Rosh Hashanah debut was so bad that he was asked to stay home on Yom Kippur (with full pay, of course), and BJ had some local rabbis lead services. They did a darn good job.

EMAIL:

Luke —

I enjoyed your post. Here is something you might find interesting.

The listing on the Beth Jacob website about Rosenblatt’s weekend as “scholar in residence” initially advertised “For Teens! Shavuot Night Shiur by Rabbi Dr. Jonathan Rosenblatt” from 3 a.m. to 3:45 a.m. See attached “before” screengrab.

Sometime during the last week before he was coming, that line disappeared. See attached “after” screengrab, which is how it currently looks on the site.

Rosenblatt listing before

Rosenblatt listing after

Posted in Abuse, Beth Jacob, R. Jonathan Rosenblatt, YICC | Comments Off on A Local Twist On The R. Jonathan Rosenblatt Scandal

These Stunning Photos of New Zealand’s Largest Gang Will Give You Sleepless Nights

LINK:

maori

Posted in New Zealand | Comments Off on These Stunning Photos of New Zealand’s Largest Gang Will Give You Sleepless Nights

The Low-IQ Crim Look

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I also wouldn’t be too surprised if the genes controlling IQ also had some unrelated effects on facial structure (we read about people having an ‘intelligent face’ in old Victorian books all the time, and they say one of the things that let our brains grow bigger was having an underdeveloped jaw), but this is probably not a line of inquiry anyone is going to pursue soon.

* Underclass white guys often have a certain look to them. Hard to describe the look, but I know it when I see it. Seabourn has the look for sure.

Here’s another guy with that look.

I think assortive breeding often results in different classes assuming certain looks.

* Likely a combination of factors. Scrunched up face (testosterone), dull look in the eyes (low IQ), general facial characteristics (mild foetal alcohol syndrome). They never had a chance.

* I wouldn’t necessarily say he looks high testosterone. More that he looks violent and thuggish. In comparison, lots of fire fighters have high testosterone and tough faces, but they don’t exhibit that thuggish look.

I’ve seen a lot of underclass white guys who looked like Seabourn. I wouldn’t be surprised if there was some underclass white Anglo ethnic group from which much of the American white underclass springs from. Men with Seabourn’s face are scarce in places like Seattle and San Francisco, but all over the place in places like Cincinnati and Cleveland.

Interesting observation about genes have an affect on appearance.

I know that we human beings have evolved the ability to look at people and detect their personalities and intentions. I suppose we might have a sophisticated enough radar that we can look at guys like Seabourn and tell that we need to be afraid of them.

A guy like this (link) exhibits toughness and lots of testosterone, but there’s something honest and trustworthy about his face.

* I’m a bit shocked that Steve hasn’t addressed the latest kerfuffle that is the continued dominance of Indian-Americans at the National Spelling Bee. In large part, this dominance reflects the fact that most Americans, including the intelligent ones, couldn’t give two shits about spelling bees – certainly not to the extent to bother spending hundreds if not thousands of hours in pursuit of victory. But Time had an interesting article on the phenomenon with this little gem: “Part of why you’re seeing their success on the rise is they’re in constant preparation mode for these various academic competitions. And there are several competitions that are exclusively for children of South Asian parentage.”

Got that? So a handful of Americans are nasty racists for insinuating on Twitter and elsewhere that Indian spelling bee winners aren’t fully American. Meanwhile the targets of their racism are prepping their kids in competitions in which non-Indians aren’t allowed – in a totally non-racist manner, of course.

* The idea of taking down everyone in the gang at once has an analogue in the military’s ideas about network warfare. The idea is to “pulse” the network and wipe out some critical percentage of it in one fell swoop. This makes it more difficult for the target social network to repair itself and to conduct the operations it once did.

* Wasn’t the original purpose of the RICO statute to provide police with the means of dismantling organized crime gangs populated by ethnic immigrants? As its name not-accidentally suggests?

* Rico was the name of Edward G. Robinson’s Al Capone-like character in pioneering gangster movie talkie “Little Caesar” in 1931.

* In most places white street gangs are defunct and no longer exist. Biker gangs and various mafias are the exception but they generally are older and stay out of sight, the Texas brouhaha notwithstanding. The homicide rates of the cities are mostly due to the black-brown gangbangers that live there. Chicago has been estimated to have between 50,000-100,000 gang members depending on which expert you listen to. Any mass roundup of gangbangers would be a sweep of younger black-brown males and would unmistakably be of a racial nature. A third to half of Chicago’s black males under 40 might have to be carted off. Estimates are that there’s 1.5-2 million nationwide. Locking up a few hundred here and there just scratches the surface. A gulag system might have to be created to receive that many black-brown prisoners along with the occasional white. A lot of children are initiated into the gang life by their parents and are 3rd-4th generation members so those are the replacement seedlings.

* There is definitely a look associated with lower class (poor and low-prole) whites. Something about squinty eyes, maybe? Also, a round face on a Caucasian man, especially when combined with squinty eyes, makes him look both stupid and thuggish. In contrast a long face tends to be perceived not only as more handsome, but also as more intelligent and higher class. A man with squinty eyes, a roundish face and rabbitty features who is not stupid is more likely to be called cunning than clever.

Perhaps this is purely an American phenomenon. English people tend to have rather long faces (“horse-faced” is a common epithet to describe toffs); perhaps this association between the original settlers – from whom the old American upper class was largely drawn – and a certain look translated into “long face = handsome, clever and classy”.

Meanwhile, Slavs tend to the have the squashed-looking face thing and squinty eyes (presumably a heritage from ancestors from the Steppes), particularly Russians. I don’t know if the look is associated with stupidity and lower social status in Eastern Europe, though.

As for “rabbitty features” – I don’t mean to attack anyone’s ethnic pride, but I think they’re associated with the Scots-Irish. This may be a purely southern thing, with the historic prejudice of coastal whites (mostly English stock) against the upland people they considered hillbillies being the cause.

* If you are a WASP who likes the criminal life, there are really are no gangs out there for people of your ethnicity. This is not a problem though for White guys who have a Russian surname, or an Albanian surname, or an Armenian surname, or an Italian surname and like the criminal life as there are gangs out there that cater specifically to those ethnic groups.

* Higher IQ requires longer childhood to develop. Lower IQ matures faster, probably leading to greater gender dimorphism in fast-developers than slow-developers.

Smart people and dumb people are genetically distinct.

* I get the impression that the Progressive Left believes the reason why Black areas are dangerous is not because Blacks are committing crimes, it is because the houses and buildings are coming to life like Transformers in these neighborhoods and committing crimes. They believe that if you drop off 25 thousand Compton Blacks into Burbank through Section 8 housing, you will see a zero increase in property and violent crime in Burbank. That is why you see Left Wing comments like Blacks are racially segregated into dangerous neighborhoods. As if you drop off the urban inner city Black underclass into affluent White areas, all of a sudden these Blacks are going to start behaving like Singaporeans and become a Model Minority Nonwhite group who commit very little crime.

* Has there ever been a notoriously famous WASP gangster in American history? All of the notoriously famous White gangsters in American history seem to be either Jewish or Catholic. Bugsy Siegel, Lucky Luciano, Al Capone, Mickey Cohen, Henry Hill, Billy The Kid, Sam Giancana, Whitey Bulger, John Gotti, Meyer Lansky, Joey Aiuppa, Richard Kuklinski, Tony Spilotro, etc none of them were of Anglo Saxon Protestant stock.

You have notoriously famous WASP serial killers, but not gangsters. I wonder if organized crime never caught on in WASP culture because WASP culture is too individualistic and organized crime is a group effort where there is no room for individualism.

* Forehead to hairline is about an inch and a half. Like a thug I knew in high school who was also stupid and thuggish. Low cranial volume would suggest low IQ.

Squinty eyes may be an advantage for those whose nature is such that it helps them that their intentions (where their eyes look) are masked. But by virtue of this nature, like those who keep their hands hidden, those with beady eyes become those who others are naturally suspicious of.

* Unless you count the KKK as a WASP organized crime group. But I would not put David Duke in the same category as a John Gotti. Nobody joins the KKK because they think they are going to make a shit load of money. The KKK is not a organized crime group in the traditional sense of the word.

Organized crime is driven by greed/profit/capitalism, the KKK is driven by racial ideology. You do not see any KKK members living a rich playboy lifestyle driving a Mercedes Benz and living in a McMansion. KKK members usually do not have a pot to piss in because they are so damn broke. KKK members usually just as equally underclass as urban inner city Blacks.

* For anyone interested in physiognomy, here are pics of Goldman Sachs people to compare with Modesto criminals.

Jesse Sebourn

Stanislaus [county of Modesto] most wanted

Goldman Sachs:

Our People

Goldman Sachs Employees Aren’t Allowed To Write Or Respond To “WTF,” “Fck,” And “F-k”

Richard, a vice president in our Investment Banking Division’s Strategies Group

Investment Management Division, New York

* The Scots-Irish have their share of leaders and patriots. They also provide the white American population with much needed backbone. I’m glad we have them in this country, but that doesn’t mean that there’s anything wrong with speculating if some white ethnic groups produce more underclass individuals than others.

The Scandanavians of Minnesota are the best behaved whites in America, but I bet most posters here would prefer more hard edged Scots-Irish types and fewer Minnesota “nice” types.

* The issue with Modesto is not that it has a lot of Hispanics, but that the poverty rate is relatively high for both whites and Hispanics. High poverty rates imply large concentrations of underclass residents, who tend to cause a lot of crime . If you look at high-poverty cities with mostly white populations, crime is an issue too.

In San Jose, Hispanics are fairly law abiding because it’s an expensive city that prices out much of the underclass. San Jose Hispanics tend to have a relatively lower poverty rate. The same is true in San Francisco.

The key to low crime rates is to have expensive housing, few rental properties, and limited subsidized housing. That prices out the underclass of all races.

Posted in Crime, IQ, Whites | Comments Off on The Low-IQ Crim Look

The US Tries To Impose Its Morality On FIFA

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* On some level the US going after FIFA really is just a smaller-scale and less harmful version of invading Iraq or stirring up violence in the Ukraine. They’re trying to impose their values, like democracy and integrity, on low-trust societies where those values aren’t going to work.

Fun fact: we don’t have words for “integrity” or “gender” in my Eastern European country. We had to import them recently from English.

* As you imply Steve, big sport is all corrupt, and that corruption spreads right up to the highest echelons. For example, deep down, every horse-punter knows that racing is all rigged, yet they still keep wasting money following it.
Fifa is an interesting case. Basically, England, the world’s biggest soccer nation – a nation which literally has billions upon billions of pounds, and a fair amount of export earnings, tied up in this ‘sport’ – was severely aggrieved when they weren’t awarded the world cup – which they saw as their ‘right’, correctly sniffed corruption at FIFA – although this is stating the obvious – and have been gunning for the head of Sepp Blatter ever since in that nasty, incessant witch-hunty sort of way only the British tabloid press can do.
Now, Blatter seems a decent enough fellow who isn’t any more ‘corrupt’ than any other FIFA boss, but the British tabloid press in full throat combined with the full pomposity of the BBC matched with a sense of wounded English pride is a ferocious beast, that just will not ease off.
The irony is that the domestic UK soccer industry is the most low down money grubbing cynical excuse for a ‘sport’ ever devised.

Posted in America, Soccer | Comments Off on The US Tries To Impose Its Morality On FIFA

High Speed Rail LA-SF

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I’ve always puzzled over the Cult’s fascination with the choo-choo. For as long as I’ve been alive it has been the dream of progressives everywhere in America to cover the nation is train lines. It’s a bizarre obsession, given the physical limits of the technology. Building two small airports with hourly shuttle service between SF and LA would be cheaper and vastly better.

I think the clue is their new obsession with the driverless car. It’s not just an improved cruise control system to avoid collisions. No, they imagine a world where driving your own car is forbidden. Freedom of mobility violates their image of the ideal world. Or, maybe they just hate people. People like driving so Progressives hate cars.

* My understanding was one of the fears was rapid transit would make it easy for ‘diversity’ to burglarize their neighborhoods.

I’ve lived in suburb after suburb where someone told me the architectural features were meant to slow down people coming out of the inner city. Twisty roads and that sort of thing.

* People outside of the city cores are figuring that out. That is why they start killing any sort of mass transit to their neighborhood. It’s the same reason that school choice gets only lukewarm support on the Republican side. From personal experience I can tell you that once the low-income families, with little or no skin in the game, get into private schools on vouchers, they bring a lot of the same issues from the schools they were in.

* That seems to be the general view of a lot regular folks outside of Los Angeles and most of them also hate the idea and will fight it tooth and nail – the folks in Acton are livid over it, same with those in the farming areas North of Bakersfield.

If they run it parallel to the current Metro-link/UP freight line that parallels the 14, it means a massive amount of construction, wiping out homes all over Acton, Palmdale, Lancaster. Oh then there’s the Tehachapi tunnels that would have to expanded for $$$$ or failing that replacing all the traditional rail line with dual use stuff – but I don’t know if it’s possible. Even if it is, that area is one giant speed bump for a high speed train.

About the only supporters of it I can find are local politicians looking for payolla and sleazy construction contractors that suckle off the state teat.

And it’s not NIMBYISM to oppose it either – who wants their neighborhood ruined to please a bunch of fat cat whites who have engorged themselves like bloated ticks off the taxpayer dime for decades.

Posted in Blacks, California, Train | Comments Off on High Speed Rail LA-SF

Essay by a teacher in a black high school

*This is a repost from the rants and raves section from the Mobile, Alabama craigslist.*

The truth is usually a tough thing to accept, so I understand if this is flagged. It would be a cowardly thing to do, but I understand it. Some people just ignore unpleasant truths. However, if you think ignoring the problem, or trying to censor the truth, will help our black children improve, you’re dreaming. This is important, so I’m happy to repost – indefinitely if necessary. I find it interesting that NO ONE has had the intellect to refute anything in the essay. They can only attempt to censor it, as if doing so somehow makes it invalid. Weak minds, weak minds.

Until recently I taught at a predominantly black high school in a southeastern state.

The mainstream press gives a hint of what conditions are like in black schools, but only a hint. Expressions journalists use like “chaotic” or “poor learning environment” or “lack of discipline” do not capture what really happens. There is nothing like the day-to-day experience of teaching black children and that is what I will try to convey.

Most whites simply do not know what black people are like in large numbers, and the first encounter can be a shock.

One of the most immediately striking things about my students was that they were loud. They had little conception of ordinary decorum. It was not unusual for five blacks to be screaming at me at once. Instead of calming down and waiting for a lull in the din to make their point — something that occurs to even the dimmest white students — blacks just tried to yell over each other.

It did no good to try to quiet them, and white women were particularly inept at trying. I sat in on one woman’s class as she begged the children to pipe down. They just yelled louder so their voices would carry over hers.

Many of my black students would repeat themselves over and over again — just louder. It was as if they suffered from Tourette syndrome. They seemed to have no conception of waiting for an appropriate time to say something. They would get ideas in their heads and simply had to shout them out. I might be leading a discussion on government and suddenly be interrupted: “We gotta get more Democrats! Clinton, she good!” The student may seem content with that outburst but two minutes later, he would suddenly start yelling again: “Clinton good!”

Anyone who is around young blacks will probably get a constant diet of rap music. Blacks often make up their own jingles, and it was not uncommon for 15 black boys to swagger into a classroom, bouncing their shoulders and jiving back.

They were yelling back and forth, rapping 15 different sets of words in the same harsh, rasping dialect. The words were almost invariably a childish form of boasting: “Who got dem shine rim, who got dem shine shoe, who got dem shine grill (gold and silver dental caps)?” The amateur rapper usually ends with a claim–in the crudest terms imaginable — that all womankind is sexually devoted to him. For whatever reason, my students would often groan instead of saying a particular word, as in, “She suck dat aaahhhh (think of a long grinding groan), she f**k dat aaaahhhh, she lick dat aaaahhh.”

Black women love to dance — in a way white people might call gyrating. So many black girls dance in the hall, in the classroom, on the chairs, next to the chairs, under the chairs, everywhere. Once I took a call on my cell phone and had to step outside of class. I was away about two minutes but when I got back the black girls had lined up at the front of the classroom and were convulsing to the delight of the boys.

Many black people, especially black women, are enormously fat. Some are so fat I had to arrange special seating to accommodate their bulk. I am not saying there are no fat white students — there are — but it is a matter of numbers and attitudes. Many black girls simply do not care that they are fat. There are plenty of white anorexics, but I have never met or heard of a black anorexic.

“Black women be big Mr. Jackson,” my students would explain.

“Is it okay in the black community to be a little overweight?” I ask. Two obese black girls in front of my desk begin to dance, “You know dem boys lak juicy fruit, Mr. Jackson.” “Juicy” is a colorful black expression for the buttocks.

Blacks, on average, are the most directly critical people I have ever met: “Dat shirt stupid. Yo’ kid a bastard. Yo’ lips big.” Unlike whites, who tread gingerly around the subject of race, they can be brutally to the point. Once I needed to send a student to the office to deliver a message. I asked for volunteers, and suddenly you would think my classroom was a bastion of civic engagement. Thirty dark hands shot into the air. My students loved to leave the classroom and slack off, even if just for a few minutes, away from the eye of white authority. I picked a light-skinned boy to deliver the message. One very black student was indignant: “You pick da half-breed.” And immediately other blacks take up the cry, and half a dozen mouths are screaming, “He half-breed.”

For decades, the country has been lamenting the poor academic performance of blacks and there is much to lament. There is no question, however, that many blacks come to school with a serious handicap that is not their fault. At home they have learned a dialect that is almost a different language. Blacks not only mispronounce words; their grammar is often wrong. When a black wants to ask, “Where is the bathroom?” he may actually say “Whar da badroom be?” Grammatically, this is the equivalent of “Where the bathroom is?” And this is the way they speak in high school. Students write the way they speak, so this is the language that shows up in written assignments.

It is true that some whites face a similar handicap. They speak with what I would call a “country” accent that is hard to reproduce but results in sentences such as “I’m gonna gemme a Coke.” Some of these country whites had to learn correct pronunciation and usage. The difference is that most whites overcome this handicap and learn to speak correctly; many blacks do not.

Most of the blacks I taught simply had no interest in academic subjects. I taught history, and students would often say they didn’t want to do an assignment or they didn’t like history because it was all about white people. Of course, this was “diversity” history, in which every cowboy’s black cook got a special page on how he contributed to winning the West, but black children still found it inadequate. So I would throw up my hands and assign them a project on a real, historical black person. My favorite was Marcus Garvey. They had never heard of him, and I would tell them to research him, but they never did. They didn’t care and they didn’t want to do any work.

Anyone who teaches blacks soon learns that they have a completely different view of government from whites. Once I decided to fill 25 minutes by having students write about one thing the government should do to improve America. I gave this question to three classes totaling about 100 students, approximately 80 of whom were black. My few white students came back with generally “conservative” ideas. “We need to cut off people who don’t work,” was the most common suggestion. Nearly every black gave a variation on the theme of “We need more government services.”

My students had only the vaguest notion of who pays for government services. For them, it was like a magical piggy bank that never goes empty. One black girl was exhorting the class on the need for more social services and I kept trying to explain that people, real live people, are taxed for the money to pay for those services. “Yeah, it come from whites,” she finally said. “They stingy anyway.”

“Many black people make over $50,000 dollars a year and you would also be taking away from your own people,” I said.

She had an answer to that: “Dey half breed.” The class agreed. I let the subject drop.

Many black girls are perfectly happy to be welfare queens. On career day, one girl explained to the class that she was going to have lots of children and get fat checks from the government. No one in the class seemed to have any objection to this career choice.

Surprising attitudes can come out in class discussion. We were talking about the crimes committed in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, and I brought up the rape of a young girl in the bathroom of the Superdome. A majority of my students believed this was a horrible crime but a few took it lightly. One black boy spoke up without raising his hand: “Dat no big deal. They thought they is gonna die so they figured they have some fun. Dey jus’ wanna have a fun time; you know what I’m sayin’?” A few black heads nodded in agreement.

My department head once asked all the teachers to get a response from all students to the following question: “Do you think it is okay to break the law if it will benefit you greatly?” By then, I had been teaching for a while and was not surprised by answers that left a young, liberal, white woman colleague aghast. “Yeah” was the favorite answer. As one student explained, “Get dat green.”

There is a level of conformity among blacks that whites would find hard to believe. They like one kind of music: rap. They will vote for one political party: Democrat. They dance one way, speak one way, are loud the same way, and fail their exams in the same way. Of course, there are exceptions but they are rare.

Whites are different. Some like country music, others heavy metal, some prefer pop, and still others, God forbid, enjoy rap music. They have different associations, groups, almost ideologies. There are jocks, nerds, preppies, and hunters. Blacks are all — well — black, and they are quick to let other blacks know when they deviate from the norm.

One might object that there are important group differences among blacks that a white man simply cannot detect. I have done my best to find them, but so far as I can tell, they dress the same, talk the same, think the same. Certainly, they form rival groups, but the groups are not different in any discernible way. There simply are no groups of blacks that are as distinctly different from each other as white “nerds,” “hunters,” or “Goths,” for example.

How the world looks to blacks: One point on which all blacks agree is that everything is “racis’.” This is one message of liberalism they have absorbed completely. Did you do your homework? “Na, homework racis’.” Why did you get an F on the test? “Test racis’.”

I was trying to teach a unit on British philosophers and the first thing the students noticed about Bentham, Hobbes, and Locke was “Dey all white! Where da black philosopher a’?” I tried to explain there were no blacks in eighteenth century Britain. You can probably guess what they said to that: “Dat racis’!” One student accused me of deliberately failing him on a test because I didn’t like black people.

“Do you think I really hate black people?”
“Yeah.”
“Have I done anything to make you feel this way? How do you know?”
“You just do.”
“Why do you say that?”

He just smirked, looked out the window, and sucked air through his teeth. Perhaps this was a regional thing, but the blacks often sucked air through their teeth as a wordless expression of disdain or hostility.

My students were sometimes unable to see the world except through the lens of their own blackness. I had a class that was host to a German exchange student. One day he put on a Power Point presentation with famous German landmarks as well as his school and family.

From time to time during the presentation, blacks would scream, “Where da black folk?!” The exasperated German tried several times to explain that there were no black people where he lived in Germany. The students did not believe him. I told them Germany is in Europe, where white people are from, and Africa is where black people are from. They insisted that the German student was racist, and deliberately refused to associate with blacks.

Blacks are keenly interested in their own racial characteristics. I have learned, for example, that some blacks have “good hair.” Good hair is black parlance for black-white hybrid hair. Apparently, it is less kinky, easier to style, and considered more attractive. Blacks are also proud of light skin. Imagine two black students shouting insults across the room. One is dark but slim; the other light and obese. The dark one begins the exchange: “You fat, Ridario!” Ridario smiles, doesn’t deign to look at his detractor, shakes his head like a wobbling top, and says, “You wish you light skinned.”

They could go on like this, repeating the same insults over and over.

My black students had nothing but contempt for Hispanic immigrants. They would vent their feelings so crudely that our department strongly advised us never to talk about immigration in class in case the principal or some outsider might overhear.

Whites were “racis’,” of course, but they thought of us at least as Americans. Not the Mexicans. Blacks have a certain, not necessarily hostile understanding of white people. They know how whites act, and it is clear they believe whites are smart and are good at organizing things. At the same time, they probably suspect whites are just putting on an act when they talk about equality, as if it is all a sham that makes it easier for whites to control blacks. Blacks want a bigger piece of the American pie. I’m convinced that if it were up to them they would give whites a considerably smaller piece than whites get now, but they would give us something. They wouldn’t give Mexicans anything.

What about black boys and white girls? No one is supposed to notice this or talk about it but it is glaringly obvious: Black boys are obsessed with white girls. I’ve witnessed the following drama countless times. A black boy saunters up to a white girl. The cocky black dances around her, not really in a menacing way. It’s more a shuffle than a threat. As he bobs and shuffles he asks, “When you gonna go wit’ me?”

There are two kinds of reply. The more confident white girl gets annoyed, looks away from the black and shouts, “I don’t wanna go out with you!” The more demure girl will look at her feet and mumble a polite excuse but ultimately say no.

There is only one response from the black boy: “You racis’.” Many girls — all too many — actually feel guilty because they do not want to date blacks. Most white girls at my school stayed away from blacks, but a few, particularly the ones who were addicted to drugs, fell in with them.

There is something else that is striking about blacks. They seem to have no sense of romance, of falling in love. What brings men and women together is sex, pure and simple, and there is a crude openness about this. There are many degenerate whites, of course, but some of my white students were capable of real devotion and tenderness, emotions that seemed absent from blacks — especially the boys.

Black schools are violent and the few whites who are too poor to escape are caught in the storm. The violence is astonishing, not so much that it happens, but the atmosphere in which it happens. Blacks can be smiling, seemingly perfectly content with what they are doing, having a good time, and then, suddenly start fighting. It’s uncanny. Not long ago, I was walking through the halls and a group of black boys were walking in front of me. All of a sudden they started fighting with another group in the hallway.

Blacks are extraordinarily quick to take offense. Once I accidentally scuffed a black boy’s white sneaker with my shoe. He immediately rubbed his body up against mine and threatened to attack me. I stepped outside the class and had a security guard escort the student to the office. It was unusual for students to threaten teachers physically this way, but among themselves, they were quick to fight for similar reasons.

The real victims are the unfortunate whites caught in this. They are always in danger and their educations suffer. White weaklings are particularly susceptible, but mostly to petty violence. They may be slapped or get a couple of kicks when they are trying to open a bottom locker. Typically, blacks save the hard, serious violence for each other.

There was a lot of promiscuous sex among my students and this led to violence. Black girls were constantly fighting over black boys. It was not uncommon to see two girls literally ripping each other’s hair out with a police officer in the middle trying to break up the fight. The black boy they were fighting over would be standing by with a smile, enjoying the show he had created. For reasons I cannot explain, boys seldom fought over girls.

Pregnancy was common among the blacks, though many black girls were so fat I could not tell the difference. I don’t know how many girls got abortions, but when they had the baby they usually stayed in school and had their own parents look after the child. The school did not offer daycare.

Aside from the police officers constantly on patrol, a sure sign that you are in a black school is the coke cage: the chain-link fence that many majority-black schools use to protect vending machines. The cage surrounds the machine and even covers its top. Delivery employees have to unlock a gate on the front of the cage to service the machines. Companies would prefer not to build cages around vending machines. They are expensive, ugly, and a bother, but black students smashed the machines so many times it was cheaper to build a cage than repair the damage. Rumor had it that before the cages went up blacks would turn the machines upside down in the hope that the money would fall out.

Security guards are everywhere in black schools — we had one on every hall. They also sat in on unruly classes and escorted students to the office. They were unarmed, but worked closely with the three city police officers who were constantly on duty.

There was a lot of drug-dealing at my school. This was a good way to make a fair amount of money but it also gave boys power over girls who wanted drugs. An addicted girl — black or white — became the plaything of anyone who could get her drugs.

One of my students was a notorious drug dealer. Everyone knew it. He was 19 years old and in eleventh grade. Once he got a score of three out of 100 on a test. He had been locked up four times since he was 13.

One day, I asked him, “Why do you come to school?”

He wouldn’t answer. He just looked out the window, smiled, and sucked air through his teeth. His friend Yidarius ventured an explanation: “He get dat green and get dem females.”

“What is the green?” I asked. “Money or dope?” “Both,” said Yidarius with a smile.

A very fat black interrupted from across the room: “We get dat lunch,” Mr. Jackson. “We gotta get dat lunch and brickfuss.” He means the free breakfast and lunch poor students get every day. “Nigga, we know’d you be lovin’ brickfuss!” shouts another student.

Some readers may believe that I have drawn a cruel caricature of black students. After all, according to official figures some 85 percent of them graduate. It would be instructive to know how many of those scraped by with barely a C- record. They go from grade to grade and they finally get their diplomas because there is so much pressure on teachers to push them through. It saves money to move them along, the school looks good, and the teachers look good.

Many of these children should have been failed, but the system would crack under their weight if they were all held back.

How did my experiences make me feel about blacks? Ultimately, I lost sympathy for them. In so many ways they seem to make their own beds. There they were in an integrationist’s fantasy–in the same classroom with white students, eating the same lunch, using the same bathrooms, listening to the same teachers–and yet the blacks fail while the whites pass.

One tragic outcome among whites who have been teaching for too long is that it can engender something close to hatred. One teacher I knew gave up fast food–not for health reasons but because where he lived most fast-food workers were black. He had enough of blacks on the job. This was an extreme example but years of frustration can take their toll. Many of my white colleagues with any experience were well on their way to that state of mind.

There is an unutterable secret among teachers: Almost all realize that blacks do not respond to traditional white instruction. Does that put the lie to environmentalism? Not at all. It is what brings about endless, pointless innovation that is supposed to bring blacks up to the white level. The solution is more diversity–or put more generally, the solution is change. Change is an almost holy word in education, and you can fail a million times as long as you keep changing. That is why liberals keep revamping the curriculum and the way it is taught. For example, teachers are told that blacks need hands-on instruction and more group work.

Teachers are told that blacks are more vocal and do not learn through reading and lectures. The implication is that they have certain traits that lend themselves to a different kind of teaching.

Whites have learned a certain way for centuries but it just doesn’t work with blacks. Of course, this implies racial differences but if pressed, most liberal teachers would say different racial learning styles come from some indefinable cultural characteristic unique to blacks. Therefore, schools must change, America must change. But into what? How do you turn quantum physics into hands-on instruction or group work? No one knows, but we must keep changing until we find something that works.

Public school has certainly changed since anyone reading this was a student. I have a friend who teaches elementary school, and she tells me that every week the students get a new diversity lesson, shipped in fresh from some bureaucrat’s office in Washington or the state capital. She showed me the materials for one week: a large poster, about the size of a forty-two inch flat-screen television. It shows an utterly diverse group — I mean diverse: handicapped, Muslim, Jewish, effeminate, poor, rich, brown, slightly brown, yellow, etc.–sitting at a table, smiling gaily, accomplishing some undefined task. The poster comes with a sheet of questions the teacher is supposed to ask. One might be: “These kids sure look different, but they look happy. Can you tell me which one in the picture is an American?”

Some eight-year-old, mired in ignorance, will point to a white child like himself. “That one.”

The teacher reads from the answer, conveniently printed along with the question. “No, Billy, all these children are Americans. They are just as American as you.”

The children get a snack, and the poster goes up on the wall until another one comes a week later. This is what happens at predominately white, middle-class, elementary schools everywhere. Elementary school teachers love All of the Colors of the Race, by award-winning children’s poet Arnold Adoff.

These are some of the lines they read to the children: “Mama is chocolate . . . Daddy is vanilla . . . Me (sic) is better . . . It is a new color. It is a new flavor. For love. Sometimes blackness seems too black for me, and whiteness is too sickly pale; and I wish every one were golden. Remember: long ago before people moved and migrated, and mixed and matched . . . there was one people: one color, one race. The colors are flowing from what was before me to what will be after. All the colors.”

Teaching as a career: It may come as a surprise after what I have written, but my experiences have given me a deep appreciation for teaching as a career. It offers a stable, middle-class life but comes with the capacity to make real differences in the lives of children. In our modern, atomized world children often have very little communication with adults — especially, or even, with their parents — so there is potential for a real transaction between pupil and teacher, disciple and master.

A rewarding relationship can grow up between an exceptional, interested student and his teacher. I have stayed in my classroom with a group of students discussing ideas and playing chess until the janitor kicked us out. I was the old gentleman, imparting my history, culture, personal loves and triumphs, defeats and failures to young kinsman. Sometimes I fancied myself Tyrtaeus, the Spartan poet, who counseled the youth to honor and loyalty. I never had this kind intimacy with a black student, and I know of no other white teacher who did.

Teaching can be fun. For a certain kind of person it is exhilarating to map out battles on chalkboards, and teach heroism. It is rewarding to challenge liberal prejudices, to leave my mark on these children, but what I aimed for with my white students I could never achieve with the blacks.

There is a kind of child whose look can melt your heart: some working-class castaway, in and out of foster homes, often abused, who is nevertheless almost an angel. Your heart melts for these children, this refuse of the modern world.

Many white students possess a certain innocence; their cheeks still blush. Try as I might, I could not get the blacks to care one bit about Beethoven or Sherman’s march to the sea, or Tyrtaeus, or Oswald Spengler, or even liberals like John Rawls, or their own history. They cared about nothing I tried to teach them. When this goes on year after year it chokes the soul out of a teacher, destroys his pathos, and sends him guiltily searching for The Bell Curve on the Internet.

Blacks break down the intimacy that can be achieved in the classroom, and leave you convinced that that intimacy is really a form of kinship. Without intending to, they destroy what is most beautiful–whether it be your belief in human equality, your daughter’s innocence, or even the state of the hallway.

Just last year I read on the bathroom stall the words “F**k Whitey.” Not two feet away, on the same stall, was a small swastika.

The National Council for the Social Studies, the leading authority on social science education in the United States, urges teachers to inculcate such values as equality of opportunity, individual property rights, and a democratic form of government. Even if teachers could inculcate this milquetoast ideology into whites, liberalism is doomed because so many non-whites are not receptive to education of any kind beyond the merest basics.

It is impossible to get them to care about such abstractions as property rights or democratic citizenship. They do not see much further than the fact that you live in a big house and “we in da pro-jek.” Of course, there are a few loutish whites who will never think past their next meal and a few sensitive blacks for whom anything is possible, but no society takes on the characteristics of its exceptions.

Once I asked my students, “What do you think of the Constitution?” “It white,” one slouching black rang out. The class began to laugh. And I caught myself laughing along with them, laughing while Pompeii’s volcano simmers, while the barbarians swell around the Palatine, while the country I love, and the job I love, and the community I love become dimmer by the day.

I read a book by an expatriate Rhodesian who visited Zimbabwe not too many years ago. Traveling with a companion, she stopped at a store along the highway. A black man materialized next to her car window. “Job, boss, (I) work good, boss,” he pleaded. “You give job.”

“What happened to your old job?” the expatriate white asked. The black man replied in the straightforward manner of his race: “We drove out the whites. No more jobs. You give job.”

At some level, my students understand the same thing. One day I asked the bored, black faces staring back at me. “What would happen if all the white people in America disappeared tomorrow?”

“We screwed,” a young, pitch-black boy screamed back. The rest of the blacks laughed.

I have had children tell me to my face as they struggled with an assignment. “I cain’t do dis,” Mr. Jackson. “I black.”

The point is that human beings are not always rational. It is in the black man’s interest to have whites in Zimbabwe but he drives them out and starves. Most whites do not think black Americans could ever do anything so irrational. They see blacks on television smiling, fighting evil whites, embodying white values. But the real black is not on television, and you pull your purse closer when you see him, and you lock the car doors when he swaggers by with his pants hanging down almost to his knees.

For those of you with children, better a smaller house in a white district than a fancy one near a black school.

I have been in parent-teacher conferences that broke my heart: the child pleading with his parents to take him out of school; the parents convinced their child’s fears are groundless. If you love your child, show her you care — not by giving her fancy vacations or a car, but making her innocent years safe and happy. Give her the gift of a not-heavily black school.

Posted in Blacks, Education | Comments Off on Essay by a teacher in a black high school

How I Joined Teach for America—and Got Sued for $20 Million

Joshua Kaplowitz writes in 2003:

Most of my veteran colleagues, 90 percent of them black, also seemed helpful, though a few showed flickers of disdain for us eager, young white teachers. By the time school opened, I was thrilled to start molding the brains of my children.

My optimism and naiveté evaporated within hours. I tried my best to be strict and set limits with my new students; but I wore my inexperience on my sleeve, and several of the kids jumped at the opportunity to misbehave. I could see clearly enough that the vast majority of my fifth-graders genuinely wanted to learn—but all it took to subvert the whole enterprise were a few cutups.

On a typical day, DeAngelo (a pseudonym, as are the other children’s names in this and the next paragraph) would throw a wad of paper in the middle of a lesson. Whether I disciplined him or ignored him, his actions would cause Kanisha to scream like an air-raid siren. In response, Lamond would get up, walk across the room, and try to slap Kanisha. Within one minute, the whole class was lost in a sea of noise and fists. I felt profoundly sorry for the majority of my students, whose education was being hijacked. Their plaintive cries punctuated the din: “Quiet everyone! Mr. Kaplowitz is trying to teach!”

Ayisha was my most gifted student. The daughter of Senegalese immigrants, she would tolerantly roll her eyes as Darnetta cut up for the ninth time in one hour, patiently waiting for the day when my class would settle down. Joseph was a brilliant writer who struggled mightily in math. When he needed help with a division problem, I tried to give him as much attention as I could, before three students wandering around the room inevitably distracted me. Eventually, I settled on tutoring him after school. Twenty more students’ educations were sabotaged, each kid with specific needs that I couldn’t attend to, because I was too busy putting out fires. Though I poured my heart into inventive lessons and activities throughout the entire year, they almost always fell apart in the face of my students’ disrespect and indifference.

Posted in Blacks, Education | Comments Off on How I Joined Teach for America—and Got Sued for $20 Million