What Choices Do You Have When Your Enemy Is Modern Culture?

Post: My enemy is modern (liberal Western) culture. It is pure evil, far worse than Communism or Nazism or any of the other recent evils in history. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Who are the enemies of modern culture?

Not Christianity. Modern culture is a deviant form of Christianity, influenced by Plato and stripped of all good Christian values. Christianity today is either part of modern culture or is an empty shell of ritual. There is no significant opposition to modern culture in Christianity besides some obscure backward sects like the Amish.

Islam is a true enemy of modern culture, and therefore it is my friend. But unfortunately Islam is actually very similar to modern culture in many ways. It is quite intolerant, almost as intolerant as modern culture is. And it insists on imposing itself on the entire world, just as modern culture does. And it is fundamentally anti-intellectual just as modern culture is. Given these similarities, I cannot consider Islam as a good friend. I am just grateful whenever Islam attacks modern culture.

White nationalists are also true enemies of modern culture, and therefore my friends. Unfortunately they generally don’t consider me their friend because they are racist and I am ethnically Jewish. Racism is their big flaw, but otherwise they are reasonable. They aren’t anti-intellectual, aren’t intolerant, and don’t insist on imposing themselves on the world.

Orthodox Judaism is a true enemy of modern culture, even if they won’t openly admit it. They don’t admit it because they live within modern culture while rejecting modern culture internally. This works. Orthodox Judaism is somewhere in between Islam and white nationalism. Orthodox Judaism is racist and anti-intellectual, but is tolerant and doesn’t impose itself on others.

And that’s all. I can’t think of any other significant enemy of modern culture.

Unless one wants to be a hermit, one has to choose a culture to belong to. The choices today are horrible, but one has to choose the least bad of the horrible choices. And in my opinion, the least bad choice is Orthodox Judaism. Why Orthodox Judaism? Let’s consider the issues.

Of the choices, only white nationalists aren’t anti-intellectual. Modern culture, Islam, and Orthodox Judaism are all anti-intellectual. But unlike modern culture and Islam, Orthodox Judaism is tolerant. This means that while Orthodox Jews aren’t intellectual themselves, they will tolerate intellectuals. Modern culture and Islam cannot tolerate intellectuals. Therefore we can disqualify Islam.

The other big issue is racism which both white nationalism and Orthodox Judaism share. But unlike white nationalism, Orthodox Judaism provides a loophole with its Noahide concept. Someone who fails to meet the racial criteria of Orthodox Judaism can still be part of the community without having to obey the absurd rules of the Talmud by being a Noahide. There is nothing equivalent to this in white nationalism, so we can disqualify white nationalism for being racist without loopholes. I should note that the Noahide loophole only works for a minority of Orthodox synagogues since most Orthodox rabbis are too racist to tolerate Noahides. So this minority of Noahide tolerating Orthodox synagogues is the least horrible choice available in the modern world, and is the one that decent people (however few we are) should choose.

Posted in Orthodoxy | Comments Off on What Choices Do You Have When Your Enemy Is Modern Culture?

The 12 Tribes Had 12 Different Roles

The 12 different tribes of Israel had different tasks, different personalities, and different gifts. A model for humanity, no? Different peoples have different gifts. Jews, on average, are good at certain things, blacks at other things, goyim at other things, Orientals at other things. Together we make up the complete image of God.

Chaim Amalek: “This would be a great new game for Yidden to invent for some goyim to play: Which Lost Tribe are YOU?”

From Encyclopedia Judaica:

Modern scholarship does not generally accept the biblical notion that the twelve tribes are simply divisions of a larger unit which developed naturally from patriarchal roots. This simplistic scheme, it is felt, actually stems from later genealogical speculations which attempted to explain the history of the tribes in terms of familial relationships. The alliance of the twelve tribes is believed to have grown from the organization of independent tribes, or groups of tribes, forced together for historical reasons. Scholars differ as to when this union of twelve took place and when the tribes of Israel became one nation.

One school of thought holds that the confederation took place inside the country toward the end of the period of the Judges and the beginnings of the Monarchy. All of the traditions which see the twelve tribes as one nation as early as the enslavement in Egypt or the wanderings in the desert are regarded as having no basis in fact. This school recognizes in the names of some of the tribes the names of ancient sites in Canaan, such as the mountains of Naphtali, Ephraim, and Judah, the desert of Judah, and Gilead. With the passage of time, those who dwelt in these areas assumed the names of the localities.

Others feel that the tribes descended from the matriarch Leah – namely Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Zebulun and Issachar – existed at an earlier stage as a confederation of six tribes whose boundaries in Canaan were contiguous. Only at a later stage did other tribes penetrate the area, eventually expanding the confederation to twelve.

A second school grants that the union of twelve existed during the period of wanderings in the desert, but that Canaan was not conquered by an alliance of these at any one time. Rather, there were individual incursions into the land at widely separated periods. However, the covenant among the twelve tribes and their awareness of national unity flowing from ethnic kinship and common history, faith, and sacral practices had their source in the period prior to the conquest of the land.

The number twelve is neither fictitious nor the result of an actual genealogical development in patriarchal history. It is an institutionalized and conventionalized figure which is found among other tribes as well, such as the sons of Ishmael, of Nahor, of Joktan, and Esau. Similar organizational patterns built about groups of twelve, or even six, tribes, are known from Asia Minor, Greece and Italy. In Greece, such groupings were called amphictyony, meaning "to dwell about" a central sanctuary. Each tribe was assigned a prearranged turn in the provision and maintenance of the shrine. The amphictyonic members would make pilgrimages to the common religious center on festive occasions. The exact measure of correspondence between the amphictyony of the Hellenic world and the duodecimal structure of the tribes of Israel may be the subject of scholarly controversy, but there can be little doubt that this pattern of twelve attributed to the Hebrew tribes is very real and historically rooted. Thus, if one tribe were to withdraw from the union or to be absorbed into another, the number twelve would be preserved, either by splitting one of the remaining tribes into two or by accepting a new tribe into the union. For example, when the tribe of Levi is considered among the twelve tribes, the Joseph tribes are counted as one. However, when Levi is not mentioned, the Joseph tribes are counted separately as Manasseh and Ephraim. For the same duodecimal considerations, Simeon is counted as a tribe even after having been absorbed into Judah, and Manasseh even after having split in tw, is considered one.

The confederation of the twelve tribes was primarily religious, based upon belief in the one "God of Israel" with whom the tribes had made a covenant and whom they worshiped at a common sacral center as the "people of the Lord." The Tent of Meeting and the Ark of the Covenant were the most sacred objects of the tribal union and biblical tradition shows that many places served as religious centers in various periods. During the desert wanderings, "the mountain of God," that is, Sinai or Horeb, served as such a place, as did the great oasis at Kadesh-Barnea where the tribes remained for some time and from where the tribes attempted a conquest of the land. Many sites in Canaan are mentioned as having sacred associations or as being centers of pilgrimage. Some of these, such as Penuel, where Jacob received the name Israel, Beth-El, where the Ark rested, and Beer-Sheba, go back to patriarchal times. Jacob built an altar at Shechem and the tribes gathered there "before the Lord" and made a covenant with Him in Joshua's time. Shiloh enjoyed special importance as a central site for the tribes. There they gathered under Joshua to divide up the land by lot, and it was there that they placed the Tent of Meeting and the Ark of the Covenant. Eli's family, which traced its descent from Aaron, the high priest, served at Shiloh, and it was to Shiloh that the Israelites turned for festivals and sacrifices.

The multiplicity of cultic places raises the question of whether all twelve tribes were actually centered about one amphictyonic site. It may be that as a tribe's connections with the amphictyony were weakened for various reasons, the tribe began to worship at one or another of the sites. Possibly, different sites served the several subgroups among the tribes. Beer-Sheba and Hebron, for example, served the southern groups of tribes; Shechem, Shiloh, and Gilgal were revered by the tribes in the center of the country; and the shrine at Dan served the northern tribes. The likelihood of a multiplicity of shrines is strengthened by the fact that clusters of Canaanite settlements separated the southern and central tribes and divided the central tribes from those in Galilee. It is possible that various shrines served different tribes simultaneously, while the sanctuary which held the Ark of the Lord was revered as central to all twelve.

The changes which occurred in the structure of the twelve tribes and in their relative strengths, find expression in the biblical genealogies. The tribes are descended from four matriarchs, eight of them from the wives Leah and Rachel, and four from the handmaids Bilhah and Zilpah. It is a widely held view that attribution to the two wives is indicative of an early stage of tribal organization, the "tribes of Leah" and the "tribes of Rachel." The attribution of four tribes to handmaids may indicate either a lowered status or late entry into the confederation. In the list of the twelve tribes, Reuben is prominent as the firstborn, followed by Simeon, Levi, and Judah, the sons of Leah, who occupy primary positions.

Reuben stood at the head of a tribal league and had a position of central importance among his confederates prior to the conquest of the land. On the other hand, the same tribe is inactive during the period of the Judges – it did not provide any of the judges and during Deborah's war against Sisera, Reuben "sat among the sheepfolds" and did not render any aid. Possibly, because this tribe dwelt on the fringes of the land, its links with the others were weakened and its continued existence as one of the tribes of Israel was in jeopardy.

Simeon was absorbed by Judah. Levi spread throughout Israel as a result of its sacral duties. Judah was cut off from the rest of the tribes by a Canaanite land strip that separated the mountains of Judah and Ephraim. Reuben's place as head of the twelve tribes was taken by the house of Joseph which played a decisive and historic role during the periods of the settlement and the Judges. Joshua came from the tribe of Ephraim. Shechem and Shiloh were within the borders of the house of Joseph. Samuel came from the hill country of Ephraim. Ephraim led the tribes in the war against Benjamin over the incident of the concubine in Gibeah. At the beginning of the Monarchy, the leadership passed to Judah . The passage in I Chronicles 5:1–2 illustrates well how the dominant position among the tribes passed from Reuben to Ephraim and from Ephraim to Judah.

Each of the twelve tribes enjoyed a good deal of autonomy, ordering its own affairs after the patriarchal-tribal pattern. No doubt there were administrative institutions common to all the tribes, situated beside the central shrines, though information about them is exceedingly scanty. During the desert wanderings, leadership of the people was vested in the princes of each of the tribes and the elders who assisted Moses. They met and legislated for the entire people. There are references to meetings of tribal leaders and elders during the periods of the settlement and the Judges. "The princes of the congregation, the heads of the thousands of Israel" along with Phinehas the priest, conducted negotiations with the Transjordanian tribes, in the name of the entire nation. Joshua summoned "the elders, the heads, the judges, and the officers of Israel" to make a covenant in Shechem. The elders of Israel, speaking for the entire nation, requested Samuel to appoint a king. The incidents of the concubine in Gibeah and Saul's battle with Nahash the Ammonite are classic examples of joint action taken by the league of twelve tribes acting "as one man, from Dan even to Beer-Sheba, with the land of Gilead". In the one case, unified action was taken by the tribes against one of their members, Benjamin, for a breach of the terms of the covenant. The war against Nahash the Ammonite proves that the tribes were required to come to the aid of any one of the league that found itself in difficulty. Because of the sacral nature of the league, the wars of the tribes were considered "wars of the Lord". Nevertheless, the narratives in the Book of Judges regarding the battles which Israel waged against its enemies make it clear that the league must have been rather weak in those days.

The consciousness of national and religious unity had not yet led to a solid politico-military confederation. The Song of Deborah gives clear expression to the lack of solidarity among the tribes, for some of them did not come to the aid of the Galilean tribes. It is impossible to designate even one war against external enemies during the period of the Judges in which all the tribes acted in concert. Indeed, there are indications of intertribal quarrels and disputes. In this connection, there are scholars who hold that the judge-deliverers were not pantribal national leaders, but headed only individual tribes, or groups of them. It was only toward the end of the period of the Judges when the Philistine pressure on the Israelite tribes increased in the west and that of the Transjordanian peoples in the east, that the religionational tribal confederation assumed political and military dimensions. The Israelite tribes then consolidated as a crystallized national-territorial entity within the framework of a monarchical regime. David, Solomon, and afterward the kings of Israel and Judah tended to weaken tribal consciousness in favor of the territorial and monarchical organization. It is apparent, however, from Ezekiel's eschatological vision that the awareness of Israel as a people composed of twelve tribes had not, even then, become effaced.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on The 12 Tribes Had 12 Different Roles

The Word For Today Is ‘Ethnogenesis’

Wikipedia: Ethnogenesis (from Greek ethnos ἔθνος, “group of people, nation”, and genesis γένεσις, “beginning, coming into being”; plural ethnogeneses) is a process in which a group of people acquire an ethnicity, that is, a group identity that identifies them as an ethnic group. This can originate through a process of self-identification as well as come about as the result of outside identification.

Posted in Whites | Comments Off on The Word For Today Is ‘Ethnogenesis’

Virtuous Vs Non-Virtuous Sunbathing

Paul Johnson writes: “Even the sunbathing movement, under the impulse of Aryan and Nordic symbols, acquired an anti-Semitic flavour. Indeed in 1920s Germany there were two distinct types of nudism: ‘Jewish’ nudism, symbolized by the black dancer Josephine Baker, which was heterosexual, commercial, cosmopolitan, erotic and immoral; and anti-Semitic nudism, which was German, Volkisch, Nordic, non-sexual (sometimes homosexual), pure and virtuous.”

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on Virtuous Vs Non-Virtuous Sunbathing

Does Your Shul Have A Gerim Section?

Seen and heard:

* One Hasid to another to another: “Bro, you got any [basketball] scores for me [from last night]?”

* Saw a bloke during the Amidah tie together the talisim of the blokes in front of him.

* Yay, I did not have to sit in the gerim (converts) section! Got to roll with the popular kids.

Chaim Amalek: “In my shul we have a special section for the gerim. It is in the parking lot. In New Jersey. Just kidding! We put them on top of the roof.”

* When I say to Jews, “We’re a dangerous people”, they always agree with me. After all, we invented feminism.

Chaim Amalek: “Marxism, Freudianism, Christianity, and the Barbie Doll. What other people can make such a boast?”

* “Are you not allowed to take medication on Shabbos? Wow, man, you’re like a project. You’re high functioning.” (Friend)

* Mark: “It’s Luke Ford’s form of BDSM, he wants everyone to hate him. How else do you explain a pretend Jewish White Supremacist? I”m surprised he doesn’t walk around with a “Gas Me” t-shirt.”

Chaim Amalek: That’s a great idea for a transgressive t-shirt. We’ve all seen the “Hug Me, I’m Irish” t-shirt, but why not a “Gas Me, I’m Jewish” t-shirt? I blame anti-semitism.

* If I see another Yid in a kipa in some God-forsaken part of the globe, I’ll give a little nod to indicate that if stuff goes down, I’ve got your back, though if we’re together in Borough Park I might come over and steal your menorah and date your mother (I cleaned this observation up somewhat to make it more palatable for the goyim).

* A friend said to me today: “If you don’t post something right-wing [aka pro Israel] this week, I’m going to punch you. You post so much meaningless crap and I don’t know why you do it until I see how many comments you get and it just feeds you.”

Chaim Amalek: “Your friend fails to understand that you are not intellectually frivolous. You post what you post because it interests you to do so.”

* I told a friend organizing a fundraising banquet for a yeshiva that I was willing to come at no charge and offer an Australian benediction. He told me to videotape it and they’d consider it.

* A Tzaddik told me on Shabbos: “I have no need of porn. I have a hole.” The profundity of this vort moved me to tears and I urged the young man to speak in yeshivas.

* “The German race has been selected to dominate the earth.” (German Marxist Ludwig Woltman)

Silly goyim! Domination is for Yidden!

Mark: “Either way you Celts lose out.”

* On a surface level, today’s Daf Yomi sounds like ISIS but when we do it, it is right.

* A friend tells me, “You probably watch ‘The Eternal Jew‘ and say, ‘Goebbels has a point’.”

Posted in Conversion, Jews, Personal | Comments Off on Does Your Shul Have A Gerim Section?

Agudath Israel of America – National Public Policy Position Paper On Immigration & American Foreign Policy

They use fancy words, but like every other major Jewish organization, Agudath Israel is not aligned with America’s best interests. Like the Orthodox Union and the other major Jewish organizations, Agudath Israel supports immigration amnesty for the 20 or so million illegals living amongst us and the organization supports open borders for America, though not for Israel.

Here is their position paper:

Last, but most certainly not least, Agudath Israel maintains a vital interest in American foreign policy and international events.

In its traditional historical role as haven for oppressed persons “yearning to breathe free,” and in its contemporary role as leader of the free world, the United States stands alone in its ability to influence the conduct of international affairs. It is a privilege for Agudath Israel to convey its appreciation to the American government for steadfastly adhering to American ideals in dealing with the nations and people of the world.

Jewish people the world over, in Israel and in lands where Jews are oppressed simply because they are Jews, regard the United States as their most powerful friend and ally. That is so, in large measure, because of the policies of our government. Agudath Israel’s interest in those policies can be classified under two broad headings: the Middle East, and human rights.

The Middle East

Agudath Israel joins with all other segments of the American Jewish community in urging that the United States continue to promote the security and well being of the State of Israel. Treating Israel as the ally it in fact is indeed, the only truly reliable ally the free world has in the Middle East is a policy that has reaped and will continue to reap substantial benefits for the United States. Our government must not permit occasional divergences of opinion to obscure the basic truth that this country has both a moral and strategic imperative to support the Jewish State.

The United States has an important, and in many ways unique, role to play in the Middle East peace process. Agudath Israel commends the Clinton Administration for its devotion to the cause of peace. At the same time, Agudath Israel remains deeply concerned about the long-term prospects for lasting peace in light of the continuing inability of large numbers of Palestinians and Arabs to accept the reality of the Jewish State. In this connection, the sudden embrace by PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat of pre-partition U.N. General Assembly Resolution 181 of 1947 should be rejected and condemned for the cynical ploy that it clearly is.

Jerusalem is the eternal capital of Israel. For Israel’s closest friend effectively to deny this fact by maintaining its embassy in Tel Aviv is extremely troubling, and Agudath Israel calls upon the United States to address this anomalous situation as soon as is practicable. In addition, the American government should refrain from pressuring Israel to relinquish any of its sovereignty over the Holy City, which has always been the object of Jewish aspirations through millennia of Diaspora wandering.

Islamic fundamentalist terrorism is not confined by any means to the Middle East itself. Agudath Israel strongly supports the efforts to combat international terrorism wherever it may take place. The intelligence community must attach the highest priority toward combating this epidemic; law enforcement officials must upgrade the security provided to potential targets of these wanton murderers; and American dollars must not be permitted to flow to international terrorist groups. Agudath Israel was thus a staunch advocate of the 1996 federal anti-terrorism legislation, which embodied many of these concepts.

Human Rights and Immigration

The plight of oppressed Jews the world over has long occupied a prominent position on Agudath Israel’s agenda. From the darkest days of the Holocaust era, through the 1956 Hungarian revolution, and even today when Jews face economic or social persecution in various lands of oppression, Agudath Israel has stood in the forefront of American Jewry’s rescue and relief activities on behalf of less fortunate Jewish communities around the globe.

Through its firm and consistent emphasis upon issues of human rights, the United States sends a message of hope and support to those who are persecuted solely because they seek to practice or learn about their religious heritage. By establishing policies and enacting laws that reflect this nation’s concern for basic humanitarian values, including the fundamental rights to travel across borders without unjustified restriction and to practice one’s religion freely and openly, the United States puts other countries on notice that abuses of human dignity will not be tolerated.

The recent imprisonment of 13 Iranian Jews who have been falsely accused of spying for Israel and America is cause for great alarm – not only for the safety of these 13 individuals, but for the well-being of the entire population of Iranian Jewry, currently estimated as being in excess of 25,000. The urgency of effective diplomatic efforts to secure the release of these prisoners cannot be overstated.

Our nation can take a great deal of the credit for the fall of the Soviet Union and the movement toward democracy in the C.I.S. nations and Central and Eastern Europe. Agudath Israel supports the ongoing efforts to assist these former bastions of communism in transforming their economies and political structures to bring them more closely into line with the Western democracies. At the same time, the growing strength of certain nationalistic movements — which, among other things, exhibit frightening aspects of virulent anti-Semitism — is cause for great concern. America must remain ever-vigilant in this highly unstable corner of the globe.

Another aspect of humanitarian foreign policy that is of great concern to Agudath Israel relates to the restitution of Jewish property and preservation of Jewish cemeteries in countries where Jews once thrived but were eventually persecuted and driven away. The people and government of the United States are instrumental voices of moral authority in seeking to right historical wrongs. Agudath Israel, which has long been in the forefront of efforts on behalf of Holocaust survivors, has worked closely with such groups as the World Jewish Restitution Organization and the U.S. Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad; and commends Congress and the Clinton Administration for their tireless efforts in this regard.

Finally, in the area of immigration, Agudath Israel urges that American borders continue to be open to Jewish and other refugees who seek to come to the United States after escaping from oppressive political environments. The United States is a nation of immigrants and has long been distinguished by its generosity toward refugees from all across the globe. It is essential that such generosity continue to be maintained in today’s era of international volatility. Agudath Israel accordingly opposes any efforts to impose caps or quotas on refugees seeking safe haven in the United States. Agudath Israel further supports the provision of welfare benefits to needy non-citizen immigrants.

Posted in Agudath Israel, Immigration | Comments Off on Agudath Israel of America – National Public Policy Position Paper On Immigration & American Foreign Policy

Divide & Conquer

For centuries England’s long-time foreign policy was to encourage division and conflict in Europe, thus leaving England safer.

Israel’s foreign policy is to encourage division and conflict in the Middle East, thus leaving Israel stronger. Do you think Israel’s leaders are shedding tears as Arabs tear each other apart?

It’s good for Israel right if the Arabs are occupied killing each other? The more unstable and divided and riven with internal strife the Arab countries are, perhaps the safer the Jewish state is? The whole point of the 2003 invasion of Iraq was to destabilize and divide the country into Sunni, Shia and Kurd sections, that way Iraq would be less of a threat to Israel, right?

I’m not a foreign policy expert, but if I am correct in the above, it means that what is good for the Jewish state is not good for the Middle East.

A multicultural and multiracial Europe and America is better for minorities, perhaps, because the goyim will be so busy feuding with each other and distrusting each other, so weakened by the loss of homogeneity and racial/religious/national identity, how will they find the time and will to kill Jews? A 99% pure Aryan state is a much bigger threat to Jews than a 62% one, filled with impurities.

I’m not a policy expert, but if the above is correct, then what is good for minorities is often bad for the majority. I sure hope I am missing something.

A Jewish friend says:

I wanted to weigh in on whether having a fractured Arab world benefits Israel.

Before that, I think it is important to distinguish between what constitutes Jewish interests in the United States and Canada from Jewish interests in Western Europe, from Jewish interests in Eastern Europe and Jewish interests in Israel. I am not sure that they are at all the same.

If you study the history of the modern state of Israel as a dispassionate observer, it is pretty clear that it is a colonial state. It was founded and originally populated by Jews primarily from Eastern Europe, later with a large influx from Arab countries. The Jews displaced a native Arab population, that now calls itself Palestinian, but that simply designates the area they are from.

If you believe that God promised the land to the Jews, then none of this makes any difference, but that is not the sort of argument that one makes to people who are not so religiously inclined or sympathetic to that religious view (that is to say Christian Zionists.)

Because Israel has always been in a situation where it has a large restive internal population and until it signed a peace treaty with Egypt, at war not only with its neighbors but with its neighbor’s neighbors, its policies have always been expedient and the country has exploited Arab weakness with superior tactics, but without much of a strategic vision and certainly without attempting to implement any long term strategy for the country’s survival.

Israel benefits from having stability in neighboring countries, if those countries have a government that wants peace with Israel. Egypt is the perfect example of this. It served Israel to have the country have an authoritarian government, be it led by Sadat, Mubarak or no Al-Sissi. Egypt is desperately poor, and unlike Sadat’s predecessor Nasser, these men have not been demagogues seeking to divert frustration over lack of jobs and food into antagonism toward Israel. To go to Egypt’s neighbor, Libya, I don’t think Israel wanted its stability affected. If what happened to Libya happened to Egypt it would be a disaster for Israel. Israel could launch punitive raids on the Islamic fundamentalists, but much better to have the government reign them in and to be held responsible than to have unaccountable militias launch small scale attacks.

Syria and Iraq actually pose different threats to Israel. Both were relatively secular Baathist regimes. In both cases a member of a minority held power, Assad as an Alawite in Syria, Hussein as a Sunni in a Shia majority Iraq. (In fact, only a minority can effectively govern. A majority would snuff out the rights of the minorities, something that those who supported deposing Assad seem to forget.) Israel would much rather have antagonistic regimes be strictly Islamist than be ones that protect the minority. The strict Muslim governments would have less support in the West. Even Obama recognizes this in his willingness to deal with Iran which still has a large population of Christians, and smaller populations of BaHai’s and Jews.

I don’t think Israel thinks it makes any difference in a military senses whether Hussein or Assad are in power. Neither was in a position to militarily threaten Israel. Syria did fight Israel in 1967 and 1973 but its two allies in the 67 war and its one ally in 73 both made peace with Israel. Assad is a realist and knows that by attacking Israel he is signing his own death warrant.

There has been a strain in the Israeli government since at least 1967 that believes that Jordan, which has a majority Palestinian population, should depose its monarchy and become a Palestinian state, but pretty much most Israelis have been happy with the status quo first under King Hussein and now under his son King Abdullah.

I don’t think that if the Arabs weren’t involved in infighting that they would devote their resources to building war machines to challenge Israel or to fight Israel out of solidarity with their Palestinian brothers, but many Israelis would disagree with me.

Israelis have exploited and will continue to exploit factions within the Palestinians when they see if giving them a short term tactical advantage. It has been widely reported and I think accepted that Israel provided material support to Hamas when it first was organized because they wanted to split the Palestinians. Of course, they are not happy with Hamas which has proven to be a pretty intractable and resilient opponent of Israel. But you might want to imagine what it would be like for Israel if the Palestinians both in the West Bank and Gaza and those who are refugees all accepted the PLO as their legitimate government and representative. So in that sense, at least as regards the Palestinians, it serves Israel’s interest to keep them fractious.

Chaim Amalek: “I think you are wrong about what animates this insistence on open borders. It is not that they give a damn about dusky immigrants or that they want to mongrelize America. Their concern first and last is for their fellow Jews. And in this case, Israeli Jews. Notwithstanding all their bravado, they well understand that the entire Zionist enterprise could come crashing down and that millions of Jews living in Israel would need a place to move to. They want to hold the door open to everyone now because they fear that should the time come when Jews need it (e.g., during the Hitler years) it will be closed to them as it might then be to everyone else. Rather than risk it, they hold the door open for all. But it is about providing Yidden a place to run to if the Muslims ever get their act together.”

Christoph Donnellan: “This raises an interesting question. Why has ISIS/ISIL not attacked Israel or Jewish targets anywhere? Something smells rotten here. If I were an Arab I would be a Baathist rather than an Islamist Fundie or Western stooge. Assad and Hussein themselves were and are not very powerful but their ideals are much more of a threat to Zionism than wacky Islamists who are still living in the 11th century, one reason in fact why our Israeli friends are rather cozy with the Saudis.”

Posted in Iraq, Israel, Jews | Comments Off on Divide & Conquer

I am confused and ashamed of my feelings for the stomper in the blue bra

Except I am not confused. She’s young and fertile. And crazy, which is the only kind of young and fertile woman I can imagine ever going for me.

Chaim Amalek writes: “Many young black girls act this way out of ignorance – they simply don’t know any better, and they specifically do not know how to act like young ladies. So what is called for here is not more prison space for them, but specialized charm schools where they might be taught to act like proper young ladies. Where they might be feminized. Not only would this make them less violent towards others, it might also make them more desirable as potential wives for the young black men in their communities looking for young ladies to marry but not finding many. Charm schools for african American teenage girls. That’s what is called for. Not jails.”

From NYDailyNews: One down. Five to go.

The female brute who led a mob of teens inbeating a 15-year-old girl in a Brooklyn McDonald’s — a savage attack caught on video and shared across the globe — was arrested Thursday, police said.

Aniah Ferguson, 16, was identified as the hoodie-wearing assailant seen throwing haymakers at the outnumbered victim — and then stomping on her head after the teen went limp, police said.

mcdonald-fight

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on I am confused and ashamed of my feelings for the stomper in the blue bra

The Jewish Fight For Tranny Rights

Tuvia Tenebom writes:

“The toilets,” I’m told as I enter the gates of the university, “are to be shared by all: female, male and transgender.” No more separate men’s room, ladies’ room, or transgender room. I’ve never heard of other places where transgendered persons have a separate toilet, but whatever the custom is anywhere else, here in Oldenburg University everybody can use any toilet they want. And to make sure nobody is missing this important piece of social progress, signs for the pluralistic toilets are posted all over, each displaying three images: male, female and transgender.

I love this so much that I immediately rush to the toilet, just to be part of this historic moment in the annals of mankind. And what an experience it is! Young people constantly come in and go out, some to relieve themselves in the company of the other sex or gender, others just to watch mixed people relieving themselves together. I’m a bit confused about who is a man or a woman, and who is neither or both, but the sheer fact that all emit a similar odor at the same very moment excites my spiritual self like nothing else ever has.
But when I overstay my welcome at the toilet, people start to get suspicious, and so I walk to the lecture hall to take part in an international conference held by the university’s queer studies department. Almost all participants are female but I spot a few men in the first row and I sit next to them. I have always identified with minorities and I find it intellectually uplifting to identify with these white males, the absolute minority here. I try to connect with two well-dressed men, each wearing a very fashionable suit, but soon discover that both of them have breasts.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Germany, Trans | Comments Off on The Jewish Fight For Tranny Rights

Our Choices Are Narrowing And Our Times Is Running Out

Some people enjoy me because I simply say out loud what they think at 3am and don’t want to face during daylight hours.

Paul: “Well, you are right Luke. More of your unfiltered thoughts (and insights) go from your brain direct to the page than those of anyone I know. True there are a lot of misses but as I’ve said here elsewhere, even Van Gogh phoned it in some days.”

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Our Choices Are Narrowing And Our Times Is Running Out