The Migrants of Calais

Christopher Caldwell writes:

In January, INSEE, France’s national demographics bureau, announced that the life expectancy of French people of both sexes had fallen for the first time since World War II…

Even if Paris does not need a middle class, it desperately needs a lower class. Those symbolic analysts require people to chop their sushi, mix their cocktails, dust their apartments, and push their children’s strollers and their parents’ wheelchairs. This means immigrants — and increasingly it means only immigrants. Because who would you rather have washing your bathtub for 12 euros an hour? A laid-off factory worker who used to get 30 euros an hour and seven weeks’ vacation and who is now looking daggers at you? Or a polite woman from Mali, for whom the smell of Formula 409 is the smell of liberation? The banlieues are an integrated part of the world economy. There is now an immigrant-descended petite bourgeoisie. Naturally, as rich people monopolize the private housing stock, poor newcomers monopolize the welfare housing. Far from being a drain on rich people’s taxes, these projects provide subsidized housing for their servants. Big problems will eventually come, because there is no next rung on the social ladder onto which the migrants’ children can step. But this is not an acute problem just yet. For now, worrying about the banlieues is something of a red herring.

Posted in France | Comments Off on The Migrants of Calais

Steve Sailer Contest: Name the Proposed Anti-Trump 3rd Party Being Considered by GOP Donors

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* It would be a great idea to come up with some prospective names for a 3rd party representing these folks. The AEI party? The Cuba Libre party? The WSJ Editorial Page Party? The Vail Party? Likud-USA? The Act of Love Party? The 4 More Wars Party?

* Or maybe The We Hate You Party …

National Association for the Advancement of Conquistador People …

National Association for the Advancement of Billionaire People …

* Foam Party?

Inner Party?

Metrosexual-Boot-Stomping-on-an-American-Face-Forever Party?

* Goy Division

* Fair Play for Cuba Committee

* This just shows how bad the mainstream Republicans are. Of course, they still brag about helping to get the Civil Rights Act passed.

They want to destroy the US just like the Dems. Oh, but they’ll keep taxes down on the rich. That’s something I should really care about, not.

* People’s Front of Judea
The Whining Wrath
Bourgeois Globalist League
The NeoConservative NeoLiberals
The Establishment Front
Cheap Labor League
Corporate Struggle

* The Donner Party (cannibalizing White America)

* Future Of American Millenials–The FOAM Party!

* The Whining Wrath is really good.

* Or the “Burn This Bitch Down Party”. That would be REALLY diverse!

* Maybe it should be like other shady groups and have no name at all? It can just be referred to as “our thing”, “our friends in Florida”, “some important people” or, like in Point Blank, “The Organization”.

* The Anti-Semite Silencing (ASS) party.

And we do not control the media!

* I spent 100 million and all I got was this guac bowl party.

* La Cosa Nueva

* This guy is going real-time analysis on the characteristics of pro and anti Trump voters.

The strongest correlation of Pro-Trump voters – percent of county living in poverty.
Next strongest, percent of county which is biracial. Followed by percent of county which is black, followed by percent of county which is Hispanic, followed by percent of county which is foreign born.

Hmm. Anyone notice a pattern developing?

Then the anti-Trump voters tend towards:

Percent of county with higher than HS grad.
Followed by percent of county which is white and non-Hispanic, followed closely by percent of county which is white alone, followed by a number of income metrics.

What jumps out to me is that exposure to diversity strengthens the appeal of Trump and isolation from diversity predicts people scratching their head and wondering why the Trump phenomenon is taking place.

* Likud, the American chapter.

Jewish Billionaires Party.

Neocon Party.

NeoLiberal Party.

Globalist Party.

The Chosen Party.

The Israel First Party.

The Judeo-American Empire Party.

The Zionist Party.

* Bernie Sanders is fighting a similar fight with the Democratic Party but their ‘Establishment’ has already won that battle. In spite of the fact that Liberals like to think of themselves as more open minded and tolerant than conservatives, Sanders campaign is entirely limited to taking money from the 1% (white people) and transferring it to the more vibrant among us. Discussing immigration, crime, education, labor, public infrastructure, or anything else outside of the lens of “diversity” is strictly verboten. Instead of a boot stomping on his face, BLM publicly humiliates and paper trains him like a bad puppy.

* It’s not minorities that are voting for Trump, it’s whites who are forced to live around a lot of minorities, that is, they get to experience the joy of diversity for real while the anti-Trump voters, more isolated from minorities, get to experience diversity as a dream-state, and so they idealize it.

* Perhaps the most important people in the world at that point would be the commanders of submarines with sea-launched ballistic missiles carrying nuclear warheads. Once at sea they are basically unfindable even by their own navies, and captains are in complete control of the information available to the crew. Imagine a captain willing to back a faction in a civil war with even one nuclear attack–and Ohio class submarines carry 24 missiles. (I am aware that it takes three people to launch a missile, but finding three like-minded people on a submarine might not be that difficult.) I know nuclear submarine crews are carefully screened, but I wonder how one screens for those kind of attitudes.

* The Republican party has a winner in Trump and yet they don’t want him? One might think they’d be overjoyed at having a hot property and yet here they are trying to undercut him. Seems strange but this exposes how the alleged two party system is just a rigged insider’s club. Don’t be surprised if they’d prefer Hilary becoming president to that of one from their own party.

* What will happen if Trump wins the nomination and wins the general? Will these hack Republicans admit they were wrong about everything and that Trump helped their party expand more than their policy papers admitted?

It is amazing how Rush Limbaugh is sounding a lot like Sailer when it comes to demographics and voting patterns–he laid out how the Republicans are retarded for thinking hispanics will ever vote for Republicans in a big way. Even Krugman is surprised by the Republican establishment don’t understand that voters don’t give a damn about cutting Social Security and Medicare. With Trump’s campaign I’m seeing Sailer’s strategy to victory in play against the media, and against the “conservative media” that exists in Washington DC and New York.

* This presidential race is starting to sound like a Houellebecq novel. This is a two-party version of the political maneuvering that transpired in Submission. The Neo-Cons teaming up with the left to defeat the populist right.

* “Netanyahu personally attacked Trump’s immigration proposals.”

And that was after Trump made a TV spot for Israeli TV endorsing Netanyahu too. That’s some real loyalty there.

* Netanyahu was under pressure from Leftist and Arab MKs (links available on demand) to ban Trump from visiting. He didn’t want another headache or the risk that his coalition (which includes a number of lefty douches) would fall apart, nor did he want to get in further trouble with Europe (where Trump is almost universally loathed) so he issued a weaselly statement about how Israel is a democracy that respects all religions and his reception of Trump should not be treated as an endorsement of his policies. Of course this was a pathetic wimpy thing to do, and dumb as well, in retrospect, but that’s Netanyahu all over, an unprincipled man with no vision perennially thinking about how to ride out the next week.

* Can you name one pundit or hack ever admitting to being wrong on something? Punditry is the best job in America bar none. You never get fired for being wrong. You just show up. Performance doesn’t count.

* Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Davos

* You’ll Get Nothing And Like It Party
Marco Roboto Party
The Third Party
Nationalism for Me, Not for Thee Party
The Walls Are For Israel Party

Posted in America | Comments Off on Steve Sailer Contest: Name the Proposed Anti-Trump 3rd Party Being Considered by GOP Donors

Steve Sailer: Why Bernie’s Free Stuff Platform Won’t Carry South Carolina Blacks

Steve Sailer writes: In theory, Bernie Sanders’ platform of Free Stuff ought to appeal to black Democratic voters in South Carolina today. But in black politics, in both America and Africa, 19th Century European socialist logic doesn’t have much emotional appeal. It’s too abstract and impersonal.

Instead, black politics is mostly about the Big Man Gets Paid (and, in these enlightened times, the Big Woman Gets Paid.)

Hillary simply has a longer track record than Bernie of seeing that local Big Men and Big Women get their cut.

COMMENTS:

* Hillary has better name recognition. This is especially important with low-info voters. And most of the Black pols are for her. They want to be on the winning team, plus some may be paid by her campaign to get out the vote. I think I remember James Carville once bragging about bribing Black pastors. Would Bernie do that? Would he even reward his endorsers with jobs and the like if he somehow managed to win, or would he consider that sleazy?

* Also, truly poor people already get all kinds of free stuff. Bernie’s platform is for not-quite-successful white baristas who want enough free stuff to make them look upper middle class.

* Also, we already have socialism for blacks. Bernie just wants to extend the free handouts to whites. So, he isn’t really offering much new to blacks.

* The alternative theory is that poor blacks sell their votes. The sale is mediated through church or civic organizations.

Ed Rollins repeated claimed he could do this:

“We went into black churches and we basically said to ministers who had endorsed Florio, ‘Do you have a special project?’

Historical note, republican Whitman won the the race. Florio was the last governor of NJ to completely fund the state pension system.

* “The alternative theory is that poor blacks sell their votes. The sale is mediated through church or civic organizations.”

All urban democrats know this, but what gets me is that none of these black churches ever get their non-profit status revoked, whereas a white church that tried the same tactic would be under IRS scrutiny very quickly.

In a particularly weird example of this, Seattle’s homosexual mayor Ed Murray won office by buying off Somali imams who then publicly reminded him of this when he tried to shut down their hookah parlors. Naturally, he backed down.

Posted in Blacks, Democrats | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Why Bernie’s Free Stuff Platform Won’t Carry South Carolina Blacks

Steve Sailer: Trump and the Tangible

Steve Sailer writes: Marco Rubio’s latest tactic is to denounce Donald Trump as a “con man,” pointing especially to the risible Trump University venture.

But a problem with this line of assault is that the landscape is full of giant buildings with Trump’s name on them, such as the 98-story Trump International Hotel and Tower on a great site on the Chicago River, which the Trump Organization managed to open in the teeth of the financial crisis in 2009. (The Chicago project was a storyline on Trump’s reality show The Apprentice.)

Voters tend to be impressed by the construction of tangible things, especially huge ones patronized by famously rich and demanding celebrities. We’ve all managed, at minimum, home improvement projects and recognize that they require a lot of work and a lot of decision-making. Looking at this enormous luxury hotel / apartment building, it’s pretty obvious that a lot of sweating the details went into it.

A big part of Mitt Romney’s problems in 2012 was that his business career, while no doubt energetic and cognitively demanding, mostly involved intangible financial abstractions and what PR people like to call creative destruction (i.e., laying workers off). He had something to do with Staples, but other than that, the Romney people could never seem to offer much inspiring detail on what he’d been up to.

COMMENTS:

* I was just reading an article recently–can’t remember where–that sneered at Trump because he would have made more money if 30 years ago he’d just put it all in T-bills.

That largely ignores the many jobs that Trump provided. So basically, he “spent” his money on America. The guy likes deals, he’s always wanting more, and he often loses. But in the meantime, actual jobs–not consulting jobs, either–are available.

* Working middle class white people better identify with Trump’s fortune than Romney’s fortune, because Trump making his fortune involved the hiring of a lot of working middle class white people to build his big shiny things.

* These calculations ignore that he’s also spent a lot of money on living large. He could have lived in a hut and saved all his money, but he seems to have had a pretty good time spending it.

By the way, I think there’s a subconscious connection between Trump’s current popularity and how 9/11 made people feel solidarity with New Yorkers, with Trump as the rest of the country’s image of a New Yorker.

Post 9/11, Americans seem to be prouder of New York’s gaudiness than they were before. It helps explain some of the popularity of superhero movies, such as Spider-Man in 2002.

The basis of Trump’s success was betting big on New York in the late 1970s. His optimism succeeded because of all the wealth generated in intangible ways on Wall Street from 1982 onward. But Trump represents wealth that everybody can understand and identify with: building big beautiful buildings.

Everybody has managed a home improvement project or two, so we can understand that putting up huge buildings where the fit and finish are good enough for celebrities must be a difficult job.

* I think you underestimate how many middle class and poor people know that Trump is a serial exaggerator (to be kind) but they like him because they don’t think any better of the people he’s running against. My barber told me yesterday that he knows Trump is a liar but so are all of those politicians he’s running against and at least he’s not another career politician.

My barber also said he enjoyed Trump’s campaign because of the pro wrestling aspect of it – the smack talk, finger pointing, etc. & how Cruz, Rubio etc are having to embrace Trump’s tactics. He thought that it exposes the system for what it really is.

My white collar friends and co-workers just reference President Camacho from Idiocracy.

* The national focus on New York also got sharper when Jimmy Fallon took over at the Tonight Show after Jay Leno mercifully quit phoning it in from Burbank. The new show, although not to everyone’s taste, is much more attuned to a younger, more circumspect audience. Cause, effect, both, coincidence? In any event, people probably notice New York more now, and if they didn’t then Trump would speak louder. Many Americans really want to feel proud of their country, which the parties don’t acknowledge.

* The problem with people listing all the negatives of Trump is that they give us no alternatives. Yes, Trump has skeletons. Yes, Trump has done stuff we are not proud of. He is a bragger, womanizer, etc.

OK, fine. Now whom do you suggest we vote? Most people on this blog consider immigration to be the biggest single issue. What other candidate is going to tackle it? With Trump we get a slim chance of attacking this issue versus zero chance with the others.

If Pat Buchanan were running, I’d support him. Trump is basically running on Pat’s platform of immigration, trade and to some extent non-intervention.

So if you are going to slam Trump, and in some cases rightly so, please give us an alternative that we could support with a straight face. Not one that a neocon could support. Not one that a progressive could support. But one that the majority of this blog’s readers could support.

* The other thing is that we’ve all had our sense of outrage numbed by two things over the last few years:

1) The seemingly endless string of goofball publicity stunts by supposedly serious and respectable politicians. Obama is the undisputed master of this but there are so many imitators.

2) The literally endless amount of politically correct screeching and shaming we all get hit with anytime we interact with the media or web. I’d guess the average person is exposed to about five or six “boy who cried wolf” outrages of this sort every day. We’re all totally numb to it now. Only the teenage girls and gays can manage the level of moral hysteria demanded of us.

* I just appreciate Trump as a ‘wrecker’.

Another thing. The sleaze factor paradoxically protects him because there is no pretense of being respectable.

This is how Howard Stern got away with so much stuff. Since he was shameless, you couldn’t tag him with anything. He’d just laugh and say So What?

This is where Romney was vulnerable. He looked some perfect 1950s TV dad. So, the dirt on him made him look really dirty.

Trump, like Clinton, wears his dirt on his sleeve.

In another time, I would have been offended by Trump, and in some ways, still am.

But this nation is so far on morals, decency, sanity, and etc., who cares?

It’s just a matter of who can wreck the system better.

The system needs to go.

* Romney had a “fire in the belly” problem (the lack thereof). Jeb had a similar deficiency. Or was it “low energy”?

Trump seems quite robust in this area.

* Trump’s really running a meta-campaign on these levels. He’s mocking the PC-folks, baiting them, and then going so over the top outrageous they “literally can’t even”, making his fans roar and boosting him in the polls. And then he decided that if Obama could spend one night a week on the Daily Show and the The Tonight Show answering softball questions, he could do such nonsense better, since he’s got more TV experience as a reality star.

In other words, Trump’s trolling. Gloriously.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Trump and the Tangible

Blacks Bury Bernie In South Carolina

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Another in the long line of warnings: true ethnic diversity is worst for Jews.

* According to exit polls, Hillary won 84% of the black vote. Which isn’t surprising. Why would any black person vote for a 74 year old Jewish Guy from Vermont over Hillary Clinton (Mrs. First Black President)?

Blacks, Hispanics, and other minorities are going to vote for Hillary. Bernie never had a chance.

* It is probably good that the white millennials get to watch Bernie being taken out by the black vote. They need to learn early on where they stand in the Democrat’s coalition.

* Steve obviously remembers “Bridget loves Bernie” a TV sit-com about a Jewish boy and Catholic girl marriage in the 1970s.

IRC, it got canceled because Catholic and Jewish groups objected. Evidently, it was too radical for the 1970s. People were OK with a Black-white couple on The Jeffersons. but Jew/Gentile was just a bridge too far.

* Do blacks ever vote in non block-like fashion? I am always amazed at their disproportionate skewing in the general election. But in the democrat primary you’d think it might be closer to a 50-50 split. After all it pits two candidates who can’t bend over enough to get their vote. Yet even among two friendly democrat candidates they skew big time for one over the other.

* Some Jews may think they’re not white (Mike Wallace), and some Jews may think Jews and blacks have lots in common (Sarah Silverman), but to blacks Jews are the whitest whites of all. I think that’s part of what’s going on.

* “They supported her over Mr. Sanders by a 5-to-1 ratio, while he won the bulk of white voters, according to early exit polling.”

I love this outcome. I enjoy the prospect of white liberals coming to terms that there is no place for them in the Democratic Party.

* Odd that white nationalists and Jewish worldviews could be so similar and yet they are enemies. Narcissism of small differences indeed.

* Blacks can’t relate to white nerds at all. No respect for that.

All blacks want to grab the mic out of Bernie’s hand. That is their natural reaction to his lack of charisma.

Blacks can’t relate to Simon & Garfunkle. Not at all.

Highly charismatic white guys like Trump, Aaahnold Terminator, Stallone etc. may not get black votes but they get respect.

* Most American blacks dislike and distrust Jews. They’ll take a White Gentile over a Jew any day of the week.

Posted in Blacks, Democrats, Jews | Comments Off on Blacks Bury Bernie In South Carolina

Iowa students admonished for “Trump!” chants at hoops game

No wonder the old lefties are scared! Americans are discovering that they have group interests. Just like Jews think about what’s good for the Jews and blacks think about what is good for blacks, Americans are starting to think about what is good for them.

If American Jews want to get in the way of the resurgent American nationalism represented by Donald Trump, then a resurgent American nationalism could turn against Jews.

REPORT:

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A group of Iowa high school students has been admonished for seemingly using Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s name as a racial insult during a boys’ basketball game.

The chant occurred Monday during a playoff game between Dallas Center-Grimes in West Des Moines, a largely white school, and Perry, a more diverse school north of Des Moines.

According to DCG activities director Steve Watson, roughly a dozen students out of the 120 or so in attendance chanted Trump’s name after their team lost to Perry.

Trump has drawn fire for saying that illegal immigration from Mexico brings rapists and drug dealers into the U.S., among other things.

Watson says the chant was uttered three or four times before administrators stopped the students. He declined to say whether the students were disciplined, citing privacy policies.

More:

This made the Iowa news.

FOX 5 NY reported:

A group of Iowa high school students has been admonished for seemingly using Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s name as a racial insult during a boys’ basketball game.

The chant occurred Monday during a playoff game between Dallas Center-Grimes in West Des Moines, a largely white school, and Perry, a more diverse school north of Des Moines.

According to DCG activities director Steve Watson, roughly a dozen students out of the 120 or so in attendance chanted Trump’s name after their team lost to Perry.

Trump has drawn fire for saying that illegal immigration from Mexico brings rapists and drug dealers into the U.S., among other things.

Watson says the chant was uttered three or four times before administrators stopped the students. He declined to say whether the students were disciplined, citing privacy policies.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Iowa students admonished for “Trump!” chants at hoops game

Jewish Editor: Trump’s America is bad, very bad, for the Jews

Here is Andy’s self-description: “Andrew Silow-Carroll is the editor in chief and CEO of the New Jersey Jewish News, an award-winning weekly newspaper published in four editions and on the web. He was previously the managing editor of the Forward newspaper, and host of “With the Editors,” a public affairs roundtable broadcast on The Jewish Channel. A Mandel Jerusalem Fellow and former Spielberg Fellow at CLAL, Andrew has spoken, taught, moderated, or served as scholar-in-residence at the invitation of many of North America’s largest Jewish organizations.”

From the Times of Israel:

Trump’s America is bad, very bad, for the Jews

Two of my favorite television shows are about what I think it’s fair to call the “New America.” In Master of None, on Netflix, Indian-American comedian Aziz Ansari plays a struggling actor in a very real and diverse New York. His best friend is the son of Chinese immigrants. His girlfriend is white. And the plots have revolved, pointedly but never heavy-handedly, around the portrayal of minorities in mainstream media, and the struggles of immigrants chasing the American dream.

In Transparent, on Amazon, an alarmingly and hilariously dysfunctional Los Angeles family comes to terms with their father’s late-life realization that he (she) is transgender. Jeffrey Tambor plays Maura Pfefferman, the aging Jewish college professor who ditches a lonely suburban life for one in which gender and sexuality are fluid. Both of his daughters enter into same-sex relationships, and the question of whether they are gay, bi-, or adventurous seems to be left intentionally ambiguous. A son, Josh, is straight, promiscuous, and desperate for love.

Both shows represent a multicultural, urban America in which differences of all kinds are not just tolerated but celebrated. The immigrant characters in Master don’t need to prove themselves to the American “mainstream,” whatever that is, and don’t apologize for expecting America to live up to its promises. The LGBTQ characters in Transparent don’t suffer for their natures or their choices — at least when it comes to gender and sex (the Jewish characters mostly suffer from one another, but that’s an old story).

…”Mr. Trump’s popularity with white, working-class voters who are more likely than other Republicans to believe that whites are a supreme race and who long for the Confederacy may make him unpopular among leaders in his party. But it’s worth noting that he isn’t persuading voters to hold these beliefs. The beliefs were there — and have been for some time.”

And that, ultimately, is why I see Trump as a threat, not just in what his candidacy means for America as a whole, but what it means for us as Jews. His message — of distrusting the foreign, of rejecting the new, of abhorring pluralism — is directly opposed to our history in this country and our best interests as a minority. And it is empowering people who reject the very notion of racial and ethnic diversity.

It’s not immaterial that Transparent is immersed in a deeply Jewish environment. The Pfeffermans stock up for the Yom Kippur break-fast at Canter’s Deli, Josh falls in love and impregnates his mother’s rabbi, a daughter is haunted by a grandmother’s youth in Weimar Berlin. The sexual and gender journeys taken by its characters are on a continuum with the social and religious upheavals experienced by their forebears. Jews flourished in this country because we had the freedom to shed the burdens of the past and embrace a future of opportunity.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Jewish Editor: Trump’s America is bad, very bad, for the Jews

The Future of the Republican Party Is By the Pool At the Biltmore?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I wonder if Hillary watches Rubio flailing around and has 2nd thoughts about elevating Castro to VP?

He makes Rubio look bright & competent in comparison & has even fewer accomplishments.

* Just start building it with the Army Corps of Engineers using his authority to defend the borders given him in the Constitution. Then see if anybody in Congress has the guts to demand that work stop on the wall.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Future of the Republican Party Is By the Pool At the Biltmore?

Why Trump: Luke Ford Explains It All

Kathy Shaidle writes: “I’ve started reading Luke Ford again, which is probably a mistake, but still. (He seems to be courting Steve Sailer now the way he used to court Denis Prager…)

Link:

This isn’t precisely a ‘psychology’ related blog. Then again, it kinda is. The main thing is we can’t keep clogging the same two folders with Trump threads.

I can’t keep the “Luke Ford” thing straight in my head. Are there two of them? Or two Luke Ford sites? Anyway, one gained notoriety as the blog of a Midwestern Jewish-convert porn-movie reporter, but then suddenly he’d renounced smut and had this other, completely non-porn blog, while somebody else kept his old site running as by that time “Luke Ford” was practically an acronym for porn movies.

All irrelevant preamble; this rambles a bit, as most blogs do, but his summation of Why Trump via the example of Japan is simple, brilliant and as on-point as you’ll find anywhere.

Rubio reminds me of a tiny gay dog, yipping and yapping.

Posted on February 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

If Trump wins, the Republican elites (and the non-Republican elites) lose. They’re exposed.

* “Do you realize that If Bernie Sanders wins, it will be the first time that a Jewish family moved into public housing that was left vacant by a black family?”

* There is genuine vitriol in this race.

In earlier races, there were some cons who supported McCain, some who supported Romney, some who supported Perry, some who supported etc, etc, etc.

But there was no conviction, no fire, thus no real animus. Just polite going through the motions.

Romney supporters didn’t hate McCain supporters and vice versa.
Santorum supporters didn’t hate Huckabee supporters and vice versa.

But there is genuine hatred among the various factions.

Trump supporters really hate the other camps and vice versa.

But I don’t think it’s really populism vs populism, e.g. masses who support Trump vs masses who support Rubio.

While there are masses who support Rubio or others, they do so without passion.

In contrast, there is mass passion for Trump.

The real passion is between masses for Trump and ELITES for Rubio (and others).

Masses for Trump really hate the GOP elites, the elites who support Rubio(and others) really hate Trump masses.

I think the GOP elites fear Trump for professional reasons(as for other ones).
If Trump ignores all their advice and still wins, it will mean that all the experts have been phony and useless quacks who’ve been raking it in and holding power for no good reason at all.

* I live in Asia and when an Asian asks me about why Trump is popular, this is a way I use to explain it.

If you really want to understand Trump’s appeal, just look at the fact that 45% of US citizens don’t pay taxes because they don’t make enough due to jobs increasingly being low-level service work with many of the higher level jobs being taken by H1B.

Then combine it with this scenario – imagine the head of Japan announces:
1. Japan is opening its borders and plans to make the majority of the country Chinese and Muslims
2. Japanese privilege classes will begin in all schools to combat Japanese racism and the country will begin eliminating Japanese cultural events as non-inclusive
3. Japanese will pay more taxes to subsidize these workers who for the most part won’t be pay taxes
4. Crime and terrorism will go up but that is unavoidable and Xenophobic to mention
5. When any business employs a majority of Japanese ethnics, there will be a discussion of the “Japanese problem”
6. Preferences will be given in hiring to the newcomers
7. Any negative comments about what is going on will be clamped down on because if you don’t like this cultural cleansing you are Hitler.

Now, honestly ask yourself how the Japanese would react to this plan? Add those two together and it gives you an idea of why people are backing Trump.

After that, they all say they understand his appeal and would never let that type of scenario develop in their own country.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Why Trump: Luke Ford Explains It All

The Fecund City

Steve Sailer writes: After reading the book by Gagnon, Laumann, et al, I wrote to Gagnon’s co-author Edward O. Laumann and proposed they write a sequel to The Social Organization of Sexuality that could be entitled The Sexual Organization of Society.

I used my not very lurid life in Chicago as an example of how sex organizes cities geographically. In fact, I pointed out, the academic jargon term “construction” deserved to be taken more literally because much of the immense investment in construction in Chicago existed for sex-related reasons.

In 1982 when I got my MBA at UCLA and got a job offer from a downtown Chicago marketing research firm, I asked a friend in Santa Monica who had recently lived in Chicago where the prettiest girls in Chicago lived because I wanted to rent an apartment near them.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* You are a pig. The only way this post could possibly be more alarming is if you had asked, where are the prettiest white girls.

* Kinsey, of course, conducted his “survey” on prostitutes, shirt-lifters, the sexually diseased and felons.
You know, Democrats.

* Quite a bit of human behavior is focused around having sex, or achieving the result of sex, namely, children. And since having sex and having children doesn’t happen in a vacuum, but instead in a social setting, it should be obvious that there will be different social, cultural, and sexual rules in different places and at different times. As we used to say in the ’60′s, Duh.

Actually, the most interesting thing about the “performative” thesis, either in this telling, or in Judith Butler’s telling, is that it tends to undercut this entire notion that our sexual history is pre-engraved in our DNA.

Above and beyond all this pie in the sky nonsense, there are only a few ranges to human sexual conduct: either we are going to act like primates or we are going to act like the society around us, or else we are going to draw on our cultural history and find better models. The primate model is promiscuous and frankly disadvantageous to lady primates, and the current social sexual models are probably not very good for women, either. So where do we go from here? That is up to each individual.

One thing that is interesting to me is that our culture has, for a long time, evaluated a man’s virtue by his interest in engaging in perpetual copulation. I submit that is strange.

* Men who wait until their married to have sex, or otherwise constrain their animal instincts, aren’t doing so out of a lack of interest. It takes a lot of social sanction to overcome the natural self when it comes to sex.

* If you meet someone in the workplace and you are a heterosexual male, it is built into the operating system that you will note their sexual attractiveness and that this will have some effect on future interactions, since usually people who perceive each other as sexually attractive will be nicer to each other, even if they have absolutely no intention of consummating the relationship.

In popular culture women are nearly always sexually attractive unless they are playing roles that call for them to be unattractive, like Roseanne, for example. Lena Dunham, although I have never seen her TV show, is known for turning the paradigm around as an ugly woman who has sex with a lot of men, but apparently this is a comedy. (I don’t think I want to see this show.) Usually it is necessary for the lead woman to be sexually attractive to maximize advertising revenue or movie attendances.

* Social Construction of Sex and Sexual Construction of City are confused because the very hip/hot places where men find women(and vice versa) also tend to be homo-heavy and ideologically libby.

Homos often form communities in nice hip parts of cities. They also cater to glamour, fashion, and night-life. So, even much of ‘hetero’ social culture is interwoven with homo presence.

And of course, guys like to take girls out to fancy and hip cultural stuff, and that often means theater or some such, and those have long been dominated by fruiters and feminists. So, for a guy to impress his girl, he might take her to some play written by homos or feminists. Imagine that.

I used to drive around with friends the area Sailer is talking about. It was surreal cuz you’d go from hip male/female clubs to homo clubs. You’d see men and women dressed up to look hip and cool, and then you’d see a bunch of homos.

* We sure have come a long way from Age of Jane Austen. People now jump in the sack much faster.

But it’s true enough that social setting counts for a lot, and much of that happens in that setting is more about status than sex, or it’s about status-for-sex.

And fancier parts of city matter cuz that’s where men and women(especially men) can show off that they are not meater-men but men of sociability, success, culture, knowledge, and all-the-stuff-considered-fashionable.
After all, even a hillbilly in some run-down village can say “I wanna hump you.” Anyone can do that.

It is in the social setting that a man can show off that there is more to him than just ‘sex appeal’.
This is why Travis Bickle blew it big time by taking the woman to a porno movie in TAXI DRIVER. It was socially and culturally so low.
These days, however, maybe a woman won’t mind so much. Even some stuff on TV that girls watch is pretty porny. And Emma Sulkowicz… sheesh.

LAST DAYS OF DISCO is interesting movie about how men and women use all sorts of cultural signaling to impress others. Status-for-sex. Homo-ish world with Liberal elite signaling.

In a strange way, the straight male has to be sort of ‘gay-ish’ in signaling to the straight woman. If a straight woman has a homo friend, he wouldn’t be interested in her body. He would try to impress her in other ways that seems fancier and more cultured. Or since HE would not be interested in her sexually, he would prioritize the subject of what she wants and needs that what he wants or needs. Homos make women feel like they are the center of the world, which is why fashion is about homos making up womenfolk. Ho’s go for that, and that is why hipster guys have that metrosexual side.

But the old way was best. That was when fathers brought up boys and girls right.
Stuff like virginity mattered. It was valued as something to save for that special someone.
Nowadays, it’s disposed of as soon as possible. Sexual culture is all about casualness than consequence-ness.
So, if a girl is kissing a guy, she could be kissing lips that’s been licking who-knows-how-many-pooters. It’d be like indirect cunnilingus for the woman.
OR if a guy kisses a girl, he could be kissing lips that sucked who knows how many meaters? It’d be like indirect blowjob.

This is progress? For most of human history, people looked down on this stuff for good reason.
But we are supposed to pretend we are more progressed cuz men now do indirect blowjobs and women do indirect cunnilingus.

That is so ewwww.

The beginning of GODFATHER when Bonasera says he taught his daughter to never dishonor the family. Now, that is good stuff.
Or the ending of GODFATHER II where everyone is dressed respectable. Guys don’t have tattoos. And Connie is dressed proper. Not like a whore.

Indeed, THE GODFATHER is like a horror movie where people who have illicit sex get killed. Sonny fooled around, so he got killed. Carlo fooled around and he got killed. Fredo fooled around in Las Vegas, so he got killed. Tataglia the pimp got killed. Geary didn’t get killed but he got blackmailed.

Vito and Michael remain true to their women, and they live.

I just noticed the final scene of Godfather II is sort of like the scene in Cuba where the big shots sitting at the table are introduced one by one.
It’s like Michael went a long way from the idealist and member of family to a shark among sharks.

Well, people are more casual about sex these days because of birth control. That’s pretty clear.

But on the whole, nothing has changed. Thoughtless young women are looking for hunks who will protect them, and thoughtless young men are looking for the prettiest girl. As they age, women are looking for good providers, and men are looking for — the prettiest girl who will put out the most in the sack.

So men “display”, and so do women. Again, nothing has changed.

In my experience, I was turned off by women who were difficult to talk to, or who had had multiple abortions. But then, I wanted children. In retrospect, I realize I was also turned off by short unintelligent women — no matter how good looking they were — because I was instinctively thinking of the progeny we would produce.

It ‘s not easy to find someone you can talk to, who laughs at your jokes, who has compatible values concerning how to live, how to keep a home, pets, children, food, household tasks, and who can at least respect your occupational and intellectual interests. Sex is pretty far down that list: not that sex isn’t important, it’s rather that for most people sex isn’t that complicated.

* This is what is special about Whit Stillman movies.

His characters are not exactly prudes or prigs — some are — , but they intuitively understand that meaning comes from form, manners, style, honor, duty, obligation, and etc. Emotions and behavior have to be interwoven with such ideas. Otherwise, there is just sloppy gloppiness. And once this becomes the norm, it especially hits the lower orders really bad. UK is a wasteland among the former working class.
I’ve seen so many ruined lives among hornball lower classes of ALL races. And when you think of kids of these trash parents growing up to garbage pop culture, it’s really dispiriting.

Too much thinking about propriety is sort of limp, like with the four-eyed character in METROPOLITAN who is something of a dullard.

Folks gotta navigate between dull nice guy and debased ero-maniac.

All this sexual liberation stuff turned out to be a dead end.

It’s like the guy and girl talking about ‘balling’ in WOODSTOCK which is just ewwwww.
The hitchhiker couple just sound like a couple of slobs.
Or girls acting like Lena Dunham or communicating like Emma Suckowitz: “fuc* me in the butt.” The sex scene in Tiny Furniture is like a farmboy going to do it with sheep. It’s just debased.

I mean what the hell with Sulkowicz? All the nuttier when her parents are well-educated academics.
Can you imagine CASABLANCA where Bogart opens the note in the rain and reads, ‘fuc* me in the butt’?
Or imagine the scene in LOVE STORY where Jenny admits she cares. Suppose she said ‘Oliver, fuc* me in the butt’ instead.

Or imagine the scene in IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE where George and Mary are singing ‘Buffalo Gals’. Would it be progress if they were singing ‘Anaconda’ instead and if Mary were ‘twerking’?

What the hell has happened to our culture?

The end result of ‘sexual liberation’ is just people acting like animals.

It’s like food. Just pigging out like a glutton is a dead end. It’s just animal behavior.

Food becomes an ‘art’ and culture with proper forms and methods.

Men need to civilized wild girls, women need to civilize wild boys.

But we have wild girls and wild boys who talk and act like X-rated versions of Pixar characters. That’s another thing. If these people were at least adult in their emotions, their vulgarity might have some gravitas… like in LAST TANGO IN PARIS where the pain is real.
But today’s hookup culture is like Pixar cartoon characters having sex. Boys stop maturing after 13, girls after 14.

I like how Stillman used mental illness or imbalance as a kind of metaphor for problems of human nature as a whole. Some of his characters are quirky, eccentric, just borderline nuts. But how they do remain sane and maintain some kind of equilibrium? Because they do care about ideals and principles such as honor, faith, loyalty, and etc. Without such stuff, the borderline ‘loon’ in LAST DAYS OF DISCO might totally lose it.
Same with the woman in DAMSELS IN DISTRESS. Her ideas about love and stuff keep her busy and occupied enough to not lose herself to total nuttery.
I love the movie GHOST WORLD and never tire of it, but it is about the dead end life of a girl who chooses a life of WHATEVER.
A kind of hell. NO way to live.

Truffaut was something of a delinquent out-of-control and was abandoned by his parents. But Andre Bazin took him under his wing and did much to develop his mind and talent. And Truffaut become someone.
His film WILD CHILD is prolly a tribute to Bazin.

But what kind of world do we have now?

Immigrant kids come to France, and they are turned extra-savage by American black rap culture. Look at shows like Dunham’s GIRLS, look at whores like Miley Cyrus, listen to standup comics, and etc, and it seems like the current culture is invested in turning young people into savages instead of turning young savages into civilized and cultured adults.

We have thug music, pornified mainstream culture. Much of today’s TV shows would have been X-rated in 70s. It makes LAST TANGO look tame.
Every idiot vlogger sounds like Portnoy.

This isn’t good, especially for EU as millions more young men from africa and middle east are headed there. Cologne mess is just a prelude.

What passes for higher morality today? ‘gay marriage’ and trannies are ‘women’.

And then, there are all these Angry Slave Movies. Just when we need to rein in the black craziness and tell them stop acting violent, these movies like DJANGO, 12 YRS A NEGRO, and the new BIRTH OF NATION will just make blacks feel justified in their nuttery.
The past will be used to justify current black rage.

When babies are young, we don’t say NATURAL is good. Diapers have to be changed and kids have be potty-toilet trained. Controlling natural processes is what being human is about. We also teach table manners. ANIMAL HOUSE behavior is not proper eating.

And there was a time when sexuality was handled like potty-training.
At a certain age, hormones kick in, and teens have to encouraged to control their urges and seek meaningful relationships whereby sex is made meaningful.

But now, we don’t horny-train the teens anymore. We tell to them go with Nature, which is like telling young children to never learn toilet-training and just shi* all over.

So, we have ‘twerking’ as culture. We have dance where young people dance like they’re screwing. We have teachers having sex with students like school is some sex club.

All gonna end badly.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on The Fecund City