If You’ve Been Away From TV Or The Movies For A While…

From the Chateau: here’s what you may have missed:

  1. miscegenation is rampant. mostly one kind: white women with black men. also, the boob tube landscape is filling with mystery meat kids.
  2. grrlpower is on steroids. women run corporations, the military, and the united federation of planets. in fights, they routinely kick the asses of men twice their size.
  3. the bad guys are still nordic-looking white men. (with a few notable exceptions)
  4. insipid feminist boilerplate is not just implied, it is blatantly preached. the effect is jarring to anyone with half a brain cell.
  5. fags are everywhere, and all of them are well-adjusted middle class normals, brandishing the aforementioned mystery meat adopted children.
  6. did i mention the mudsharking? jeezus.
  7. black characters are still numinous, still wise, still doctors, lawyers, judges, and (most laughably) deep state operatives.
  8. trannies are beginning to make appearances. (glowing, of course)

There you have it. Entertainment for the masses has become a shitlib propaganda machine, and they are not letting up on the gas. They want to drive American culture straight into a Wall of Poz.

Posted in Hollywood | Comments Off on If You’ve Been Away From TV Or The Movies For A While…

Donald Trump Hits Hillary Clinton For Hypocrisy on Border Walls

Is Donald Trump reading Steve Sailer?

From Breitbart: Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump is calling out Hillary Clinton for supporting a protective border wall around Israel while also opposing a protective wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

“It is clear that the former Senator from New York and former Secretary of State has had a change of heart when it comes to walls and securing borders,” Trump tells Breitbart News.

“She supported a wall for Israel when it was politically expedient,” he said. “Now, she is for open-borders and flooding the country with unvetted refugees from countries that are exporting terrorism.”

“It’s bad enough that she lied to the American people about Benghazi, but now she wants to pander to those who might jeopardize our very homeland security,” he said. “This is hypocrisy at the highest level.”

In 2004, then-Senator Clinton made some of the same arguments that advocates for border-walls use today. She just didn’t happen to be talking about the United States. She was talking about Israel.

Clinton co-sponsored a July 2004 resolution that “urges the United States to vote against any further United Nations action that could delay or prevent the construction of the security fence and to engage in a diplomatic campaign to persuade other countries to do the same.”

But now she’s pandering to the progressive, open-borders wing of her party as she tries to lock up the party’s 2016 nomination.

In September, Clinton mocked Trump’s proposed border wall in a sketch appearance on Jimmy Fallon’s TV show.

In a fake conservation with a Trump mimic, she scolded him, saying “Come on Donald, America was built by people who came here, they worked their hearts out for a better life, and that’s what many immigrants are doing today. Their dream is to become American citizens. You’re trying to stop them?”

Though Clinton voted for the Secure Fence Act of 2006, and recently touted her vote to “build a barrier” along the Mexico border, she has also criticized the idea of a U.S.-Mexico border wall. She also criticized George W. Bush administration’s failed border security push, making it unclear where she actually stands on the issue, though her continued pandering to Spanish-speaking audiences and immigration reform activists provide a solid hint.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on Donald Trump Hits Hillary Clinton For Hypocrisy on Border Walls

How Homeland’s hunky hit-man Peter Quinn told us what our leaders just don’t dare say about ISIS and Islam

Katie Hopkins writes: Don’t tell me. I don’t want to hear it.
I don’t want to hear the attacks in Paris have nothing to do with Islam.
Because here’s the rub. Any man shouting Allahu Akbar as he blows himself to paradise is an adherent of the same religion and scriptures children are forced to learn, repeat and regurgitate by Muslims clerics the world over.
Or, as Peter Quinn, the CIA hitman from Homeland, put it in a remarkably prescient episode from the current series broadcast six weeks ago: ‘(ISIS) has a clear strategy. A strategy which includes beheadings, crucifixions, and the revival of slavery, and it all derives from their f*cking book, the only book they ever read.’

Posted in Islam | Comments Off on How Homeland’s hunky hit-man Peter Quinn told us what our leaders just don’t dare say about ISIS and Islam

Ilya Lozovsky: I’m a Russian-born American Jew. My people’s rejection of Syrian refugees breaks my heart.

He can’t conceive that there might be any other perspective but his own. Any other viewpoint is bigoted and racist.

From the WP comments section:

* Maybe it’s because no one thinks or ever thought that the Jewish refugees from the Soviet Union would include, embedded among them, fanatics intent on causing harm in the US?

* The naive and far leftist position expressed by the author is not shared by me, the Russian Jew living in America or most of my ex-countrymen. The person who wrote this nonsense is not a “refugee” – because he came here strictly for economical reasons and very likely has nothing to do with “Jewishness” either. So, no wonder he draws parallels between him and (in their majority) Muslim immigrants who are trying to get to the US for strictly economical reasons.

* Perhaps, they appreciate living without Muslim troublemakers.

* Ummm…Maybe because Russian Jewish refugees don’t blow things up and machine-gun people?

* Israel has a land border with Syria but has taken no Syrian refugees.
All the while canvassing for world Jewry to settle in Israel and the Occupied Territories.
The reason: Syrian refugees fail the religion text.
And other reasons as well similar to that used about Jews prior to WWII trying to flee Nazi Germany.
Of course, our other great ally, Saudi Arabia, has also taken no refugees.

* History is important, but don’t base your projected stock returns on the past performance, as they say at every brokerage firm. What we have today is that the majority of “refugees” are young males who are avoiding the fight for their own country, who are expecting free handouts, and get upset when they don’t get them. Do you really expect them to integrate into our society and build up our country? If you are – you are very naive.

* Islam preaches that all Jews are worthy of death. It teaches the same about other Muslims who are not the right kind of Muslims. It is a violent religion based on violence, ordering violence and condoning violence. This is the problem. It is not simply being biased or prejudiced to worry about Muslim influence. Nothing said about Islam and its followers is any worse than what Islam and its followers say about it. As the old saying goes, “It’s in the book”. If you don’t believe it, go to your local bookstore and pick up a copy of the Koran.

* To paraphrase an classic Soviet joke:

A dying Jewish grandfather gathered his children and grandchildren around his bed to hear his last words. “Children,” he said “Above all, you must protect the Syrian Refugees from extermination.” “But grandpa…why the Syrians,” the puzzled children asked. “Because,” he replied, “when they finish dealing with the Syrians, we’re next.”

* It is ironic that the Syrian refugees are compared to Jewish refugees. The former come from a culture that is virulently anti-semitic. The author of the article would get a real education if he initiated conversations with these refugees to find out what they think about Jews. In fact, it is less than 70 years ago that the ancient Jewish community of Syria was wiped out, such that essentially not a single Jew is left living in that country today. My fear is that the majority of these refugees, like Milton’s Lucifer, cannot escape purgatory, in their case the purgatory of hatred, by coming here, because like Lucifer, they carry their purgatory within. It is instructive that Europe is presently being emptied of its remaining Jews, who are now fleeing persecution at the hands of that continent’s recent and not so recent muslim immigrants.

* For Jews in America (native born, naturalized, refugee, etc.), here is the most important reason to object to the Syrian refugee program: For whatever the percentage of Syrian refugees who may be __________ , they are most likely 100% anti-Semitic, and that is reason enough for Russian Jews — or any Jews — to limit their number.

* Huge difference between Russian Jewish refugees and so-called Syrian refugees. The Jewish refugees from Russia can actually be vetted and we can be assured that they are who they say they are but the Syrian ones cannot. There is no way to ensure that Syrian refugees have legit documents and are who they say they are. Just because they aren’t already on a watch list, doesn’t mean that they aren’t a terrorist. Russian Jews are being persecuted for their religion in Russia. Syrian Muslims aren’t being persecuted for their religion in Syria. The only ones in Syria being persecuted and systematically exterminated are the Christians and other minority religions including Jews and yet few of those people have been let into this country – it’s almost exclusively Muslims who aren’t being persecute for their religion.

Jews aren’t trying to attack the U.S., whereas radical Muslim extremists are and want to topple our government. The Jewish faith encourages women to be educated and doesn’t treat them like property.

* Why the lack of Jewish sympathy? Maybe its because the Syrians and Iraqis were among the biggest Jews hating and anti Israel people in the Middle East. It’s rather ironic that people such as the Syrians, who were violently against Jewish refugees coming to Palestine, now are seeking refuge in the West.

* A teacher at a Muslim faith school in France has quit his job, writing in a leading newspaper that the establishment was riddled with anti-Semitism.

Philosophy teacher Sofiane Zitouni wrote in left-leaning daily Libération on February 5 that the Averroès Lycée (high school) in the northern French city of Lille was a hotbed of “anti-Semitism, sectarianism and insidious Islamism”.

* The criminal activity by the so called Russian Jewish immigrants is astronomical. They are even destroying the other country they all immigrated to….

Ilya Lozovsky writes for the Washington Post:

I am a Russian-born American Jew, and this week some of my fellow escapees from the Soviet Union — there are around 800,000 of us in the United States — have broken my heart. With the indifference many of us have expressed toward the plight of Syrian refugees, we’re breaking faith with our values and forgetting our history.

By and large, the American Jewish community has been on the right side of history on the question of Syrian refugees. Recognizing the obvious humanity of the hundreds of thousands fleeing the twin horrors of the Islamic State and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, American Jews have remembered that, barely a generation ago, our own people were unwelcome on these shores — and that, in many cases, inhospitality meant death. It’s no wonder that the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, which typically does not take positions on specific policies, has publicly urged Americans to remember this ugly history as we wrestle with the latest crisis.

As the museum’s Cameron Hudson explained, “we have a mandate to be the voice that the Jews of the 1930s did not have.”

But in the ex-Soviet corner of Jewish American life, the picture looks different. With growing despair, I have fought on Facebook this week with a parade of Mishas, Sergeis, Galinas and Julias — individuals who share my background. In their opposition to President Obama’s proposal that Americans accept 10,000 Syrian refugees (even as countries with fewer resources, like Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey, take in hundreds of thousands) they’ve seldom bothered to hide their prejudiced justifications.

I suppose I hoped that the shared experiences of my fellow Soviet exiles would serve as some kind of inoculation against bigotry. I remember reading the brilliant “Maus” as a child and, perhaps beyond anything else, being shocked by the sequence in which the narrator’s father, a Holocaust survivor, refuses to pick up a black hitchhiker. The concept of a racist Holocaust survivor made no sense to me then. Of course, I was young and naïve — I understand now that suffering does not necessarily inspire empathy for others.

But shouldn’t our experience count for more? We, too, were refugees. Unlike our American cousins who’ve been here for generations, we know what it means to have to leave your homeland. For many of us, the words “visa” and “green card” still hold emotional, almost totemic significance. Even now, over 25 years after my own (relatively painless) immigration, these words bring forth a reverential shudder. It was in this bureaucratic language that our futures were written.

So it has been wrenching to see my people react with such a startling lack of empathy. Many have called it insulting to compare Jewish and Syrian waves of immigration. The Syrians are not like us, they say. They are too poor, too fanatical. “Do they have a culture of contributing to society or taking from it?” one Facebook commenter asked, as if one’s worth as a human being is not a given, and must be earned. Never mind that many European Jews turned away from the United States during the Holocaust — particularly those with Eastern European origins — would also have been poor, religious and relatively uneducated.

Moreover, questioning Syrians’ ability to assimilate to American society overlooks the perennial debate over assimilation that all immigrant communities face — including our own.

I’ve never felt as helpless, indignant or exasperated with my people as I have as this debate has progressed. I’ve heard Syrian refugees described as savages, animals and roaches. I’ve seen Jews who I know have Holocaust survivors in their families, perhaps still living, use this language — the language, yes, of fascism — without any sense of self-awareness. As Jews, we ought to know, and feel viscerally in our guts and bones, which way that road lies.

After I posted my dissent from this ugly trend, one commenter on my Facebook page objected, saying, “There is nothing racist about not wanting Syrian refugees here.” Perhaps sensing that some qualification was necessary, he added: “I mean, it’s ‘racist’ in the same sense as being afraid to go to a high crime and predominantly black area at night. … it’s driven by reasonable fear and common sense.” Would a high crime white area make him feel any safer?

This attitude is not uncommon. A quick scroll through the Russian Jews Facebook page, where a picture of Obama is captioned with “leader” of ISIS, and where blanket comparisons are made between Muslims and Nazis, is sadly instructive.

This racism that is all too common among Jews of Soviet origin is a painful topic — seldom discussed openly, but commonly acknowledged. Current events have brought it to the surface. Many of my American Jewish friends have noted (in private) that Russian Jews, particularly older generations, seem, well, un-liberal. In Israel, too, the community of Soviet émigrés — a large and powerful block of voters — leans hard to the right. Their views are aptly expressed by former foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman, himself a Soviet-born politician, who has called for compulsory loyalty oaths for all Israeli citizens and openly supported Russian President Vladimir Putin.

There’s no particularly Jewish reason for these attitudes. The Soviets failed at creating Homo Sovieticus — a new species of human dedicated to communism and destined for global domination — but even now, 25 years after the empire’s fall, the legacy of growing up in a paranoid, undemocratic society remains. And, given the path Russia has trod since 1991, I suspect these views will be with us for years, perhaps generations, to come.

Posted in Immigration, Jews, Russia, Syria | Comments Off on Ilya Lozovsky: I’m a Russian-born American Jew. My people’s rejection of Syrian refugees breaks my heart.

‘Suspect in shooting of Tulane medical student identified’

Picture of the Suspect Euric Cain:

suspect

Picture of the good Samaritan Peter Gold (Jewish):

student

REPORT: Man Shot After Confronting Man Robbing Woman

New Orleans, LA – A man shot in the abdomen attempting to thwart an armed robbery in the Lower Garden District has been identified as a Tulane medical student.Just before 4 a.m. the 25-year-old man was shot in the abdomen at the intersection of Magazine Street and St. Mary Street.

According to a witness at the scene, a woman was being robbed on St. Mary Street at the corner on Magazine Street. The man saw the robbery taking place and stepped up to intervene. He was then shot by the assailant.

A nearby business captured the entire incident on camera. A hooded man in the video is seen dragging a woman down the street towards his vehicle. She falls down and he rips her purse away. When the Good Samaritan pulled up in his vehicle, he got out to help the woman. New
Orleans police said the perpetrator demanded money from the man. When the man explained he did not have any money, the gunman became enraged.That is when the gunman pulls out a semi-automatic weapon and shoots the victim. While the victim is lying on the ground, the perpetrator points the gun at his head and appears to pull the trigger, but the gun does
not fire. The video shows the gunman try to shoot the victim again, before getting in his grey or silver SUV and leaving the scene.The suspect should be considered armed and dangerous.

The victim was taken to the hospital where he is currently in guarded condition.

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off on ‘Suspect in shooting of Tulane medical student identified’

Islamic Scholar Outlines Islam’s Intentions for America

Link:

Hillary Clinton tweets: “Let’s be clear: Islam is not our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”

Posted in Islam | Comments Off on Islamic Scholar Outlines Islam’s Intentions for America

Kathy H. – Family Recovery Speaker – “How to become free and at peace”

Even though I am unaware of having any alcoholics in my life, I can’t stop listening to Al-Anon lectures. They help me deal with myself and with other people. I have this unfortunate tendency to not know who I am until other people tell me (either by their words or their actions). Sometimes I wake in the middle of night worried that someone I haven’t seen in months or years has unfriended me on Facebook.

Published on Jul 17, 2013: Kathy H. is one of the best Al-Anon Family Groups speakers I have ever heard! This is a very captivating and powerful workshop as Kathy shares her experience with alcoholics, and her experience with the Al Anon recovery program! She shares about practicing patience, having peace of mind, and how the program provides an immense amount of hope to someone who knows/loves an alcoholic. Kathy is a great example of how someone can get well whether or not the other person does. Lots of great stories and you are sure to be inspired after listening to this set of speaker tapes!

Posted in Addiction | Comments Off on Kathy H. – Family Recovery Speaker – “How to become free and at peace”

Russia’s Moral Framework and Why It Matters

From The National Interest:

Russia’s moral framework, particularly as it applies to contemporary Russian foreign policy, differs markedly from that of the West.

While post-Soviet Russia has no guiding ideology, it does argue that certain values, if adopted as shared principles of behavior, are more congenial to international order than others. Russia would like to see such principles of behavior be more widely adopted, but, recognizing that each nation’s cultural development is unique, it very much opposes efforts to promote any one set of ethical values beyond its borders. Hence, the only time that the international community may legitimately appeal to transnational ethical norms, is when such are sanctioned by the United Nations. This is a high bar, but, Russia argues, it has been set high on purpose, to avoid abuse.

The specific values that Russia sees as more congenial to international order are those shared by Russia’s four traditional religious communities—Judaism, Christianity, Islam and Buddhism. Their comfortable interaction with each other and with the state, Russia argues, demonstrates that religion need not be a source of conflict in the modern world. Indeed, Russian spokesmen have often argued that Western nations could learn a lot from the Russian model.

This moral framework has led to four areas of friction with the West.

The first involves the nature of the international order. Since the rise of human rights and democracy as explicit U.S. foreign-policy objectives in the 1970s, Western political leaders have argued that, in the best of all possible worlds, foreign policy is a reflection of domestic politics. The theory built around this assumption—“democratic peace theory”— in its most popular form is taken to suggest that democracies do not go to war with each other. States that promote democracy are therefore promoting a morally desirable international order, whereas states that object to such efforts are deemed immoral.

As Western concern for democracy and human rights has outpaced that of international institutions, the United States and its allies have sought ways around these institutions, by asserting that Western values are the de facto, if not de jure, international standard. When several Western nations act in concert, therefore, they do not require any explicit mandate from the United Nations. This has been a source of considerable friction between Russia and the West.

A third source of tension stems from the erosion of traditional religions as the arbiters of morality in the West. For some in the West, it follows that international society must now find some alternative normative framework. Since the values of individualism, secularism and modernization led to the rise of the West, according to this line of thinking, they serve as appropriate benchmarks for the rest of humanity.

Finally, in today’s Russia the Orthodox Church is closely partnered with the state. It provides both intellectual and moral support to many state policies, not because it has to, but because it wants to. The current moral framework of Russian foreign policy is, indeed, its view, which the Church promotes because it is convinced that creating a “congenial international order” will assist it in its threefold salvific mission—to save individual souls, to save all national cultures that have been baptized into Christ, and to save all mankind. Needless to say, this is as far from the doctrine of separation of Church and State as East is from West.

The moral contours of the present East-West conflict should now be readily apparent. Russia opposes the adoption of any single set of cultural values as the standard for international behavior. Many in the West counter that Western values are not just a lone cultural standard, but the de facto universal standard. Russia labels this unilateralism and advocates a multipolar world order based on pluriculturalism as a better alternative.

Pluriculturalism argues that there is an inherent (“God-given,” according to Vladimir Putin) value to diversity among nations. This is distinct from multiculturalism which values diversity within nations. Russia assigns diversity within nations a lower priority than it does diversity among nations. By contrast, Western states more typically prize diversity within nations (the rights of the individual), whereas among nations they seek to subordinate national cultural differences to standards, such as human rights, that express modern Western values.

The potential for international conflict is obvious, but it is hardly inevitable. For one thing, if we look at this debate in historical and religious context, we see that it has deep roots in the West.

Thus, Russia’s pluriculturalism, which argues that national cultural distinctions impose certain moral limits on the conduct of foreign policy, used to be called “American exceptionalism” in this country and was typically cited as the reason America does NOT go abroad, as John Quincy Adams put it, “in search of monsters to destroy.” Contrast this to president Obama’s assertion last year at West Point that “America must always lead on the world stage. If we don’t, no one else will,” which takes it for granted that subjecting all nations to American leadership is a moral good.

Posted in America, Russia | Comments Off on Russia’s Moral Framework and Why It Matters

Get Ready, China: This Is Why Australia Needs Nuclear Weapons

From The National Interest:

Over the past century, Australia has been America’s most dependable military ally. In every major U.S. conflict, including World Wars I and II, Korea, Vietnam and Iraq, Australians have fought alongside.

Yet as competition between China and the United States heats up in the Western Pacific, Australia is cautious not to provoke its greatest trading partner. When it comes to a potential U.S.-China conflict, Australia is doing all it can to keep its options open – and with good reason.

Australia is highly vulnerable to long-range missile attack, including those carrying nuclear payloads. Despite Australia being a continental power, almost all its population is concentrated in a half-dozen major cities — easy targets for small numbers of warheads.

In a high-intensity conflict between the United States and China, it is conceivable that China may target Australia with long-range nuclear missiles as a step up the escalation ladder, demonstrating to the United States its capacity, and willingness, to conduct nuclear strikes over intercontinental ranges.

In this eventuality, extended nuclear deterrence would hardly be credible. Retaliating on Australia’s behalf would demonstrably mean accepting large-scale nuclear attack by China on the continental United States.

For this reason, many Australians believe entering into conflict with the world’s most populous nuclear power, for any reason and under any circumstance, is unthinkable – despite very strong support for the Australia-U.S. alliance overall. The most effective means for Australia to insulate itself from long-range nuclear attack is to develop or acquire its own reliable long-range nuclear deterrent.

Many would consider this a bad idea. If Australia (a non-nuclear weapon state party to the NPT) went nuclear, conventional wisdom suggests it very difficult to dissuade Japan, South Korea and others from following suit, critically threatening the nuclear non-proliferation regime as a whole.

This view is fundamentally flawed. In actuality, Australia has a very unique legal status with regard to nuclear weapons.

At present, there are five Nuclear-Weapon States under the NPT (United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France and China). Under Article IX.3 of the NPT, a country may accede to the treaty as a Nuclear-Weapon State if that state “manufactured and exploded a nuclear device prior to January 1, 1967”.

Australia qualifies. In the 1950s and ’60s, Australia hosted a series of nuclear tests conducted by the United Kingdom. These nuclear explosions were conducted on Australian sovereign territory with the active participation of Australian scientists and military personnel.

These tests received financial support direct from the Australian government, with at least some explosions likely to have used fissile material that had been sourced locally from within Australia. No other non-nuclear weapon state party to the NPT is in this category.

As Rod Lyon of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute sharply has observed from recently declassified documents, Australian negotiators were very much cognizant of this legal basis prior to Australia joining the treaty. In sum, if Australia determined it was a national security imperative to develop an independent nuclear deterrent, it would be legally entitled to do so.

Posted in Australia, China | Comments Off on Get Ready, China: This Is Why Australia Needs Nuclear Weapons

Woodrow Wilson Headed For The Dust Bin Of History For His Racism?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I’m seriously starting to think that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Abraham Lincoln may soon be put on the political chopping-block as well given that their outspoken “racism” was vastly worse than that of poor Wilson, plus they mostly supported slavery or even owned slaves themselves.

Can anyone think of the last time this has happened in a major country not undergoing a Communist revolution or a foreign occupation or something like that?

* Lincoln mass murdered white Americans, not blacks. Sure, he was openly racist and horrified with black people. Most blacks are fine with this simplification of him as the good guy. He did play a large role in emancipating black slaves.

* Princeton has 5,500 undergrads. 17 students managed to browbeat the administration like this? That’s pathetic.

* I have long suspected that the Jefferson Memorial will be renamed the Sally Hemings Memorial for Victims of Sexual Assault any day now.

Of course it is odd to see this sort of thing happening in the USA today; although this is precisely the kind of thing that has happened in previous revolutions (as in, France, Russia, etc.) What is mystifying to me however is that this “revolution” is not be led by a intelligentsia minority that seeks (or claims to seek) the betterment of 90% indigent peasants or what have you. This is simply a small and vocal minority that seems to have terrified the powerful simply by raising their voices.

It’s very strange theater.

Posted in Academia, Blacks | Comments Off on Woodrow Wilson Headed For The Dust Bin Of History For His Racism?