Joseph & The Egyptians

From the Chayenu on Torah portion Vayigash: “The last section of the parashah describes how Joseph prepared Egypt and its populace for the eventual enslavement of the Jewish people. This servitude had been foretold to Abraham in the ‘Covenant between the Halves,’ in which G-d informed Abraham that “your descendants will be foreigners in land that is not theirs, and the people will enslave them and oppress them.’ In order to alleviate their future suffering as much as possible, Joseph took advantage of the fact that only his storehouses of grain had survived the years of famine to amass first all the capital in Egypt and then to ‘purchase’ its citizenry as slaves. He then had the Eygptians circumcised and resettled them throughout Egypt. By so doing, Joseph ensured that future generations of Egyptians could never taunt their Jewish contemporaries for being refugees, slaves, or circumcised, since they themselves were the same (or children of the same). Once these goals had been achieved, there was no more technical need for the famine to continue…”

I wonder if the Egyptians resented Joseph and the Jews for enslaving them, for circumcising them, and for resettling them?

I wonder if Joseph realized that enslaving, circumcising and displacing the Egyptians might have negative consequences for Jews? It’s not like you can just do anything to the goyim and they won’t react with anger.

Posted in Egypt, Jews | Comments Off on Joseph & The Egyptians

The Inconvenience of Rapey Refugees

Rod Dreher writes:

Well, well, well: Deutsche Welle reports something ‘politically awkward’:

City authorities identified some suspects in the Cologne New Year’s Eve attacks as asylum seekers from Syria, detaining or questioning some of them, according to reports by local newspaper “Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger” and national daily “Die Welt,” which published an online preview of investigations by its “Welt am Sonntag” Sunday paper.

According to the newspapers’ reports, citing officers on duty on New Year’s Eve, officials checked the IDs of at least 100 people present at Cologne’s central station on December 31 after their behavior became conspicuous. Seventy-one people were identified, 11 people were remanded into custody and 32 criminal complaints were registered, according to the Welt am Sonntag (WamS) report.

“There were, quite to the contrary of what was said publicly, identity checks on numerous people,” the WamS quoted an unnamed officer as saying. “Most of them were recently-arrived asylum seekers.”

The first internal police report on the event – a so-called “wichtige Ereignis Meldung” (“important event announcement”) – spoke of a crowd mainly of “North African and Arab” origin. According to the Kölner Stadt-anzeiger, the officer leading the team at the station wanted the report to include mention of the Syrians and asylum seekers, but the senior officer writing the “WE-Meldung” decided not to, saying it would be “politically awkward.”

It is still unclear whether the same persons were involved in the assaults.

More:

WamS also received information contradicting another official statement by the city police, which said the main intention of the men in Cologne was to steal from passengers and that assault was secondary. However, “what actually happened was the exact opposite,” a police officer said on condition of anonymity.

“For the mostly Arabic offenders, sexual assault was the priority, or, to express it from their point of view, their sexual amusement was thepriority. A group of men would encircle a female victim, close the loop, and then start groping the woman,” WamS quoted the officer as saying.

The deputy chief of the trade union for police employees (the GdP), Ernst Walter, suggested that the Cologne police’s mishandling of the case could cost city police chief Wolfgang Albers his job: “I’m asking myself this,” Walter said. “How could the police publish a message on January 1, saying that New Year’s celebrations had been peaceful?”

So the authorities lied because the truth was “politically awkward.” And not just the authorities. Maajid Nawaz writes:

Though this all occurred on New Year’s Eve, the absolute scandal is that we only found out about it five days later. Amid accusations that it deliberately covered the incident up in order not to spark panic, the public broadcaster ZDF was forced to issue an apology for failing to include the assaults in its main evening news broadcast. It appears that, as the authorities and the media were choosing between stirring up racial tension and these women’s rights, we were faced with a conspiracy of silence.

Eventually, this was bound to happen. Recent mass migration patterns across Europe have meant that misogyny has finally come head to head with anti-racism, multiculturalism is facing off against feminism, and progressive values are wrestling with cultural tolerance.

Yes, it is racist to suspect that all brown men who look like me are rapists. It is bigoted to presume that all Muslim men who share my faith advocate religiously justified rape. It is xenophobic to assume that all male refugees are sexual predators awaiting their chance to rape. But let me be absolutely clear: What will feed this racism, bigotry, and xenophobia even more is deliberately failing to report the facts as they stand. Doing so only encourages the populist right’s rallying cry against “the establishment.”

If liberals do not address such issues swiftly, with complete candor and courage, the far-right and anti-Muslim populist groups will get there first. They have been doing so for a while now.

This is how it happens, though, in Europe, in America, everywhere: mainstream parties, institutions, and figures cannot bring themselves to deal with difficult truths, so they ignore them and dismiss people who pay attention to these things as racist, or otherwise bigoted. But the contradiction between observable reality and the Official Story may finally cause things to snap.

This, reported by the BBC, via Steve Sailer, only heightens the contradictions:

Ralf Jaeger, interior minister for North Rhine-Westphalia, said police had to “adjust” to the fact that groups of men had attacked women en masse.

Three suspects had been identified, he said, but no arrests had been made.

Scores of women say they were robbed or sexually assaulted by men, reportedly of Arab or North African appearance.

Mr Jaeger also warned that anti-immigrant groups were trying to use the attacks to stir up hatred against refugees.

“What happens on the right-wing platforms and in chatrooms is at least as awful as the acts of those assaulting the women,” he said. “This is poisoning the climate of our society.”

Right. Noticing what happened and drawing the “wrong” conclusions about it is “at least as awful” as actual rape and sexual assault. If Ralf Jaeger and the local authorities have any credibility at all with the German people, it is a miracle.

Writing at The Grauniad, Gaby Hinsliff bravely counsels her fellow liberals not to be afraid to ask questions about the sexual assaults, as long as the answer is always, “More immigration.” And:

Liberals shouldn’t be afraid to ask hard questions. Young German women thankfully enjoy historically unprecedented economic and sexual freedom, with their expensive smartphones and their right to celebrate New Year’s Eve however they want. The same isn’t always true of young male migrants exchanging life under repressive regimes, where they may at least have enjoyed superiority over women, for scraping by at the bottom of Europe’s social and economic food chain. It is not madness to ask if this has anything to do with attacks that render confident, seemingly lucky young women humiliated and powerless. But even if it does, the answer wouldn’t be to halt immigration – even if that were possible, which it isn’t regardless of whether Britain leaves the EU – just in case a few immigrants are sexually aggressive, any more than the answer to Savile is to keep all men away from children.

Think about what you just read: a liberal woman columnist at the left-wing Establishment newspaper in the UK has just said that it is “not madness” to see the Arab immigrant rapists as victims of political oppression at home and economic oppression in Europe. Anything — anything — to protect the Narrative. European liberals would do much better to pay attention to their Maajid Nawazes than their Gaby Hinsliffs and Ralf Jaegers. But they won’t.

UPDATE: Chancellor Merkel says the assaults will have far-reaching consequences. Chancellor Merkel is also refusing to put a cap on the number of refugees Germany will take in this year. As long as the right hand doesn’t notice what the left hand is doing, hey, no problem!

Posted in Germany, Islam, Rape | Comments Off on The Inconvenience of Rapey Refugees

Haven Monahan Back in the News

Steve Sailer writes:

Nicole Eramo patiently listened to Jackie’s story about Haven Monahan several times and rightly figured out it wasn’t legit, for which she was much denounced as a facilitator of campus rape culture from Nov. 19th to December 1st, 2014.

By the way, a search through the New York Times archives reveals that the newspaper finally published the name “Haven Monahan” in late March 2015, more than 4 months after CNN used it.

It’s revealing that Jackie catfishing Haven Monahan into digital pseudo-existence didn’t start out as a feminist thing, but instead was just about the girliest ploy imaginable, intended to make a boy she liked jealous. Her conversion into a feminist icon as star victim of white male patriarchy only happened gradually as she figured out that’s what our culture wants.

It’s interesting to contrast the American media’s immensely credulous response in November 2014 to Sabrina Rubin Erdely’s absurd write-up of Jackie’s ridiculous story to the Germany media’s attempt to hush up the New Year’s Eve goings-on in Cologne during the first few days of January.

Who? Whom?

Posted in Journalism, Rape | Comments Off on Haven Monahan Back in the News

Law Enforcement Officials, Medical Professionals: There’s Something Seriously Wrong With Hillary Clinton’s Health

From Breitbart: Democrat frontrunner Hillary Clinton’s disappearance from the debate stage last month left people speculating that the former First Lady took a long bathroom break, but now a law-enforcement source with inside connections is alleging that Clinton was missing from the stage due to health issues stemming from a previous brain injury.

These long-lasting symptoms stemming from a concussion and blood clot, according to a neurologist, suggest Clinton is suffering from post-concussion syndrome, which can severely impact her cognitive abilities.

All that said, however, Clinton’s campaign maintained to Breitbart News that she is in good health and can serve as President of the United States.

“Strong source just told me something I suspected. Hillary’s debate ‘bathroom break’ wasn’t that, but flare up of problems from brain injury,” wrote John Cardillo on Twitter.

Cardillo, who previously worked as an officer who provided VIP security details for the New York Police Department (NYPD), told Breitbart News that he knows of two additional sources who have commented about Clinton’s health problems, which have even impacted her ability to walk to her car after delivering a speech.

“I got this from both a [federal agent] … and I also got it from a New York [NYPD] guy who worked security at a Hillary event in New York City,” Cardillo told Breitbart News, adding:

These are two people that aren’t just personal friends. I worked with one and then post law-enforcement worked with another on some related things. So, these aren’t anonymous people. These are good friends. Both of them told me the same thing, that after her speeches, whether she did a talk or a policy speech, she had to sit behind – she would come off the podium backstage – and have to sit and rest before making it back to the car because she was so fatigued, dizzy and disoriented.

Cardillo said these two security officials don’t know each other and do not live in the same state, but “their stories were almost identical.”

One of the men told him that Clinton was “very pale, kind of disoriented. He said she looked like she was about to faint. She was very pale, almost sweaty.”

Cardillo said one of the incidents occurred while she was Secretary of State. The event worked by the NYPD official was roughly a year ago.

Veteran Republican strategist Roger Stone, who previously worked with GOP frontrunner Donald Trump, told Breitbart News that he has also heard about Clinton’s long-term health problems.

“A number of New York Democrats, very prominent, well-known, wealthy New York Democrats, told me last year that Hillary had very significant health issues and that they were surprised that she was running in view of her health problems and her lack of stamina,” Stone told Breitbart News. “So far, she’s run a very controlled campaign,”

“I don’t think she has the physical stamina to be president,” he stated. “I have no doubt that Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)79%
won’t call her on it, but Trump certainly would.”

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on Law Enforcement Officials, Medical Professionals: There’s Something Seriously Wrong With Hillary Clinton’s Health

Will Trump Be The King Or The Patsy?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Trump is going to be the fall guy. The house of cards is about to collapse and who better to take the blame than the guy voted into office by old racist white men. This is a role that Trump was handpicked to play. Establishment and media pretend to be overwhelmed by Trump so that when the bottom falls out and the baby boomers don’t get their social security/medicaid/private pension, they get to say “I told you so” and look like the responsible adults they never were. They get to blame democracy and claim voters are too stupid to know what’s good for them. Especially racist white voters. It’s all a matter of who gets left holding the bag, taking the blame. We are beyond reform. There is no set of policies that is going to un-eff this situation. Let the establishment and democratic socialism take the fall. Not racist old white men who voted for Trump.

* I support Trump mainly for the things he says. He wants to fight the media and stand up to the media. He has already done that and continues to do that. No matter what he really thinks or believes or will do in the future, he has already provided great value.

He has spoken of minorities and immigrants in a way, and with a phrasing that disrespects the unspoken codes and taboos set down by the media for speaking about minorities and immigrants. And he don’t care. That has great value.

Trump is a propaganda weapon for the majority. His words have great value for the white working class majority in america. It doesn’t really matter whether he believes what he says. He may be hustling in the sense that he does not believe what he says. But he says these things. And those things he is saying have great value in this propaganda-based society we live in.

* People who have nothing to lose generally don’t need to worry much about getting hustled. Describe to me the scenario in which supporting Trump hurts me. Don’t describe the scenario in which supporting Trump turns out to be pointless; I can imagine that. But even then, I find Trump amusing and would feel that I got my money’s worth from the entertainment value alone. No, you will need to convince me that supporting Trump could actually make things worse. Sadly, that doesn’t seem possible at this point.

* If Trump wins the nomination he’ll beat Hillary like a red-headed stepchild in the general. She is unbelievably weak and vulnerable on so many fronts, and her advantages (political machine, donors, and media support) can be turned into liabilities by Trump’s antifragile campaign (i.e., media and other establishment attacks actually make Trump stronger by reinforcing his status as the anti-establishment, anti-status-quo candidate that Americans overwhelmingly crave).

Trump, the only candidate not controlled by donors, is not limited to the conventional topics and avenues of attack. He’s free to attack Hillary from the left as well as the right, and her record of incompetence and extreme corruption will give him a near unlimited supply of ammo, which he’s proved to be adept at using to pigeonhole and crush well-heeled establishment opponents.

Jeb Bush is actually a stronger opponent than Hillary, given their respective records and the fact that Hillary is one of the few people on Earth that make Jeb look charismatic and likeable. And look at how easily Trump put Jeb in a low-energy box and wiped the floor with him, despite Bush’s connections, respectable record, and massive war chest.

Look for Trump to peel off a huge amount of the Dems’ white working class base, and to capture record numbers of blacks for a Republican. He’ll also win a higher share of the single female vote than any other Republican could hope for due to his genuine alpha male personality.

Lastly, Hillary is an uninspiring candidate, so a lot of minority and millennial voters who drank the Obama Kool Aid will stay home, while Trump will galvanize conservative and independent voters who had lost faith in the system and didn’t show up for Romney or McCain (I know a lot of people like this, and I am one myself). The enthusiasm and dedication of Trump supporters continues to be underestimated.

* Anyone have a take on how Trump’s trying to raise the birther issue with regard to Cruz is working out?

My sense is that it is a mistake: brings back memories of Trump’s birther thing with Obama, which did not work out that well.

On the other hand, every time in the last six months that I thought Trump was blowing it, he pulled it off.

* I have to imagine that many religious conservatives secretly welcome a Trump Presidency because it will allow them to get out of the trap they are in. Abortion is not just a political loser but it has smothered and held hostage all the other religious and morally conservative issues that they hold dear. Like a revanchist pipe dream, they have held on so tightly for so long now that there is no other way out.

* If the media gave great attention to the extent of black criminality in this country, and the viciousness of black-on-white crime, I’m sure they would find a large audience for it. Crimes like the Wichita massacre, the Knoxville horror, the Yahweh cult killings, and the Zebra murders are tailor-made for tabloid TV, and yet they’re swept under the rug. So it’s about the agenda, not about attracting viewers.

* Rick Santorum has a really sound immigration plan, which he seems to understand even better than Trump does his, and what good did it do him? The messenger counts at least as much as the message.

* But have you noticed that the Overton Window is also getting pushed wider on the left side as well? Clinton has publicly purged the term “illegal alien” from her vocabulary (not that she was using it anyway) and has promised to go beyond Obama in executive orders to amnesty illegal immigrants. BLM rhetoric is now a staple on the Democratic side. And the protestors, even though they’re a miserable little bunch, keep winning every confrontation on campus.

* I doubt anyone supporting Donald now thinks he’s a saint. We all know his flaws. But a commenter here put it best: “He’s an asshole, but he’s my asshole.”

Warren Harding was no great shakes as a man– basically a Clinton-with-consent– but by signing an immigration bill within days of his inauguration he served his country as well as any president ever has. Trump could do the same. Like Reagan, he scares all the right people, and has the same “unelectability” that worked so well for Reagan, Nixon, and Johnson.

He won’t make America great again, but he just might allow us to.

Sessions is kind of a clean version of Newt Gingrich. His function is to draw up policy and see it enacted. Newt was a stellar strategist but a most unappealing front man, which is why he could capture the House but then waste the opportunity. Jeff is much more palatable, but doesn’t see his place at the front of the movement. Give him credit for that, at least.

* It wouldn’t surprise me if Steve Sailer has an higher IQ than most people would expect. I wouldn’t guarantee it, but his output & life pattern has many of the fingerprints of such a scenario. I mean, he’s figured out how to live a singularly unusual, interesting/stimulating, and comfortable life far outside the bounds of social expectations basically doing what the f**K he likes while implicitly/explicitly shooting the bird to the dead weight of social expectations, PC, respectability, etc. That is not an easy problem to solve, lots harder than some math proof.

Though he isn’t boastful about it, he obviously has intimates/associates who are recognized as world class brainwaves or achievers. Dollars to doughnuts, more than one of them has told him, or at least thinks, that he is one of the smartest people they’ve ever met.

* The media tells us Trump is the weakest potential GOP nominee, precisely because he is the strongest. There are polls that show him losing to Hillary, and ones that show him beating her. The media only pays attention to the former. But all those polls are largely irrelevant; Trump is going to do the work of defeating Hillary after he’s secured the nomination. He’s barely started on her, and she’ll be lucky to win as many electoral votes as Dukakis got in 1988.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Will Trump Be The King Or The Patsy?

How To Deal With The Islamic Invasion

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* The US government seemed to have little problem drafting, training, clothing, feeding, arming, transporting, supplying and medically treating ~15 million men during World War 2. Funny how the government is perfectly capable of such massive feets when it needs to be.

If the government wants to kick them out it is perfectly capable of doing so.

* Conscription is a bad idea if you are giving citizenship to Islamic invaders and then conscripting (and training them up to 1rst-world military standards). It would be smarter to keep an all-volunteer force and encourage European-heritage men to step up to the plate.

* Moving people is easy. It’s a matter of will. They say you can’t rapidly shift millions of people to another country. Yet that’s just what’s been happening for the last year, but in the wrong direction.

* The police chief of Cologne has been driven out. The real reason of course is not his failure to prevent the attacks. That is Merkel’s fault. The real reason is the un-PC comments he made later.

MORE COMMENTS:

* Mass rapes in the aftermath of conquest are certainly an expression of power. Is that what is happening in Sweden and Germany right now? Are the migrants/refugees/invaders showing their new dominance by taking the conquered people’s women? I think that this may be beyond ordinary criminality.

* I also think the lack of a heavy physical response by the locals probably confirms to them they are indeed conquerors. One would think that local German men would have gathered and pounded a few of these guys into ground. By not doing so they are probably going to invite more such attacks.

A couple years ago some Mexican sailors tried to harass some Polish women on a Baltic beach. The local Poles did not take it lying down. This should have been the response in Germany.

* Salon is ignoring this story completely. Instead they published an essay about how women scientists are “forced to endure” a culture of sexual harassment and another one about the health benefits of drinking urine.

* Western men (and those in other developed nations) have been emasculated by their shrill feminist teachers and co-citizens. This has ironical left these same women exposed to assaults and harassment by more aggressive and unashamedly masculine foreigners.

* If rape is mainly about power, it is hard to explain why people tend to stick so rigidly to victims that match their sexual preference. I mean why do hetero men, even extremely violent criminals, so rarely rape people of the same sex out of revenge or whatever. It does happen, but not that much. And it would be particularly humiliating. Instead, they just beat you or torture you or cut off a limb or something. It’s like people tend to only use rape when they want to humiliate or overpower people they are already sexually attracted to.

* Lack of a heavy physical response by the locals probably indicates the cultural emasculation of German men by cradle to grave ‘liberal’ indoctrination.

Posted in Islam, Rape | Comments Off on How To Deal With The Islamic Invasion

HOW TO PREVENT MIGRANT RAPE

Comment: “Colin Liddell over at Alternative Right has evaluated some suggestions on how to alleviate the sexual tensions of the male migrants. It makes for some depressing reading and he admits that there’s no viable solution.

My guess is that the authorities opt for a prostitution/pornography solution, but the results will be disappointing and Western women will end up travelling only under escort.”

Colin Liddell writes:

Tensions are high all over Europe because of Muslim acts of terrorism and rape, the latest ones being the mob attacks on German women in Cologne.

While acts of terrorism will come and go, and may even abate for long periods of time thanks to the efficiency of our surveillance and police states, acts of Muslim rape are much less likely to cease. They will continue to be a regular and recurring phenomenon wherever Muslim migrants are housed, and can be expected to keep tensions between migrants and the locals simmering over.

This is because out of the vast numbers of migrants who have arrived in Europe last year – conservatively estimated at between 750,000 and 1,500,000 – and those who will arrive this year, the overwhelming majority are, and will continue to be, young men. One estimate is that 72% of them are adult men, with just 13% women, and 15% children. Many of the “children” are teenage boys, already feeling the first stirrings of sexual desire, while most of the adult men are in the more sexually virile or incontinent age groups of twenties and thirties.

In other words, the great majority of these “Muslimmivaders” are males of an age at which they think almost ceaselessly about sex, but without any sexual outlets of their own, such as wives or girlfriends.

Added to this, it is a highly significant fact that these young men are moving from societies where women are routinely covered up and jealously guarded to societies where they are allowed to wear whatever or as little as they like, and are unguarded.

The obvious outcome of all this is that those countries that are most accommodating to the refugees can also expect to be on the receiving end of having their women regularly raped.

From a right-wing perspective this is unacceptable for obvious reasons that do not need to be stated, but even from a left-wing perspective this is deeply problematic, as it means that the leftist goal of assimilating these non-Europeans into European society will become even more unrealistic and hopeless than it already is. Areas with large refugee populations are doomed to become increasingly polarized, as locals grow to distrust and hate the incomers and the incomers are taught to resent that.

Rape and sexual assaults, rather than terrorism, will therefore be the factor driving the two groups apart and keeping them that way, with the end result that migrants will become an increasing welfare burden and security risk.

Alt-Rightists, of course, have a simple and elegant solution for all this, but, as we are only a tiny minority politically, it may be more useful to address this problem in terms that our political opponents may be ready to concede, and by doing so gradually push them to a position of reductio ad absurdum.

So, setting aside the obvious solution of deporting the migrants (or locking them up), the only plausible way to prevent this rape tsunami is first to acknowledge the key fact of massive gender disparity among the migrants, and secondly to directly address the problem of sexual needs that this creates.

There are four obvious – and non-partisan – ways in which the problem can be dealt with, namely:

Balancing the number of male and female migrants
Providing local women
Providing alternatives to women
Chemical castration

Posted in Rape | Comments Off on HOW TO PREVENT MIGRANT RAPE

Why Do Women Vote For Tyranny?

BLOG: But while women (as a group) tend to vote for tyranny, the question is whether they do this consciously. Whether they do it maliciously.

Do women wake up every morning, licking their chops saying, “I can’t wait to bring down Western Civilization today!”

Or are they just naive, blissfully believing the sweet lies politicians tell them about free education, free health care, free child care, free food, free housing and free everything?

The answer is rather clear.

Very few people are genuinely evil and wish bad things upon others. And we can safely say that the majority of women are NOT evil people who wish to destroy the best development of human history. And though there are some genuinely evil people who DO wish to destroy and harm others (feminists and SJW’s) the vast majority of women are well intentioned, caring people.

The problem, however, is you can be the sweetest woman with all the best intentions in the world. If you’re naive or ignorant to the point you’re wrong, you’ll still have the same effects of being an evil, malicious person out to cause damage. Thus, whether out ignorance or evil, society is going to pay the exact same price no matter what your intentions. And so, as women vote and make other decisions in life about how the country should be run, Western Civilization suffers because of their ignorance and naivety.

The first and most obvious of these is money.

Money is not the root of all evil or some kind of tool of control of evil capitalists. It is your time. It is your life. It is what you get in exchange for forfeiting a fraction of your FINITE life in the form of labor. You then use this “root of all evil” as a means to SUPPORT YOURSELF and KEEP YOURSELF ALIVE.

The freedom of speech is one thing.
The freedom of religion is another.
But the freedom to be entitled to the majority of the money you make is the most important freedom as it is your LIFE.

But women think nothing of voting in tyrants who want to take it.

Readers of my blog are already intricately aware of the amount of money governments take from their citizens every year. They are aware of government spending to GDP. They are aware of government debt to GDP. They are aware 70% of the state’s budget goes to income redistribution. They are aware of the difference between a million and a trillion.

Your average Western Civilization female voter is not.

You average female voter is a by product of her evolution, environment, genetics and upbringing. And therefore your average female voter is stuck in “stage one” thinking where she:

1. Wants to solve a problem, but
2. Doesn’t know how much it will cost, but
3. Doesn’t care because she never looked at the budget anyway because
4. She thinks “the government has unlimited money” because
5. She really doesn’t know the difference between a million and a trillion

so

6. Votes for more government spending anyway.

The problem is she LITERALLY does not realize that money just doesn’t come from “poof” out of nowhere. And she CERTAINLY does not understand how the government just “printing off more money” would result in hyper-inflation. Thus, in a very naive and child-like way, she will do what is logical to a 7 year old. Vote for more government money, consequently voting the country that inch further into tyranny and enslaving us all that micro-second more in taxes.

Now, you multiply this times 150 million women, over the course of now four generations and you get what we’re all familiar with. Debt to GDP of 110%. Government spending as a percent of GDP of 40%. Slowing economic growth, etc. But the larger point is the relationship between women voting and government is not merely one of more “socialists” being elected, but increased government spending which DIRECTLY lessens the amount of money and TIME we have to ourselves.

Posted in Feminism | Comments Off on Why Do Women Vote For Tyranny?

Men Invade, Women Invite

From the Chateau: Masculinity is invasive, femininity is invitational. Funny how the most fundamental biomechanical sex differences play out similarly in the bedroom and on the geopolitical world stage. A comment from Steve Sailer’s:

strutting military-age youths with smartphones, giving Germany’s surrender a weird sexual vibe that nobody yet has explained satisfactorily even in retrospect.

Is it really that hard to explain?

The sexual appeal of strutting military age young men would be to whom? To women, both young and old. If the appeal is sexual it can’t be to anyone else. It is to women.

Does that mean an invasion of these Muslims is appealing to women? The smart answer seems to be No. But if the sexual appeal is not to women, then there is no sexual appeal, but we know and we feel there is a sexual appeal. Therefore the correct answer has to be YES. And the smart answer has to be wrong.

The sexy men are invading because the women want it.

And it’s stupid but it’s not false.

When men make a mistake, they invade somewhere they should not have–due to male desires blinding their reason.

When women make a mistake, they invite someone they should not have–due to female desires blinding their reason.

The reason we have not yet seen an explanation is that we assume politics are based on male desires. And second, women do not understand their own desires, so they would be less able to articulate this than I am. What woman would say, “I know it is stupid, but I need to see if these sexy, strong foreigners might make better lovers and rulers.”

But that’s the answer.

Setting aside for the moment the theory that there is a Freudian undercurrent of debased sexuality that motivates Western White woman’s advocacy for the mass importation of third world refugees invaders, there is something real and profound to the general observation that invasion – the storming of beaches, the colonizing of foreign lands – is a male thing, and invitation – the throwing open of borders and homes to alien peoples, the coddling and sanctification of wretched refuse – is a female thing. And just as it is with intimate consummation, so to does Woman find her purpose opening her nation’s thighs (and sometimes her own thighs) to receive the impudent cock of a dusky totem.

Examining the “White women desire swarthy refugee cock” hypothesis, another commenter replies to the above quoted comment,

The people who crave the complete destruction of the european peoples like to say this – and it can be persuasive for people who look at alternative news sites because those sites focus on the military aged male aspect of the invasion – but the truth is the opposite and in plain sight when you look at the pictures used by the mainstream media to manipulate the public.

The pictures the MSM show are nearly always children and mothers in distress.

You’re right the deliberate destruction of the european peoples is being brought about because of western women but the reason is the media are deliberately manipulating their sympathy for the children.

Just look at any msm news since it started.

What was the major turning point in the media’s propaganda campaign – the dead kid on the beach.

There is certainly truth to this, but only so much. Plenty of European women have now seen video streams and photographs of young Muslim men crowding into Germany and elsewhere, and yet they still heartily support the resettlement of a large and growing fraction of the Muslim world into their homelands. I don’t believe media propaganda can anymore shoulder sole blame for influencing all these shitlib White women to take selfies holding signs saying “Welcome refugees!”. There is a deeper, darker psychological compulsion at work, and yes it could have a sexual dimension hitched to a social status whoring dimension.

Whatever the psychological motivation of refugee-loving White European women, it has to stop, or be stopped, soon. The survival of Western civilization is at stake.

Another commenter writes on the same topic,

Women are instinctively attuned to selective pressures, and when a woman sees foreign people flooding in and people seemingly powerless to stop it, her limbic system starts to presume that selective pressures favor some gene or genes in the former and starts to think about acquiring those genes for her own offspring, especially since those genes are going to confer immunities to diseases and pathologies that the foreign people are likely to bring along with them that the natives aren’t going to be immune to.

Women are aroused by male strength and dominance above all other considerations. If the wider culture and ruling classes are arranging society so that Muslim migrants have the run of the place, and the native White men are hindered from expressing their displeasure and acting on it, the native White women will begin to feel desirous of those migrants, feeling in their bones that these are the tribe leaders they are looking for. But this is heady, Heartistian id analysis that is far too dark for most people, so I don’t expect any public shaming campaign of women’s redirected desire to begin any time soon.

COMMENTS:

* What, ever, would a woman see in groups of invading hoards?
!!
1. Novelty, for starters; chicks dig novelty. Swipe fucking right.
2. They appeal to her maternal hindbrain; THEY NEED HER HELP! (corollory, they need her emotional investment. emotional investment = vag tingles, one feeds the other)
Further reading: women don’t have babies any more.
Further, further, reading: Western guys don’t really require much of her emotional investment any more either (euggh gross)

3. Revenge, for the alphas who ditched her.

4. Pity, (related to 2)
5. Disgust (related to the “pity” part)
6. Deflection/Displacement: she DOES care everyone! Just look at how much she cares everyone!.

7. There’s another kind of emotion in there too, I’ve no name for it, but the closest thing I can think of is a kind of a kind of “fuck you Dad-ism”: a kind of contempt laden with guilt for the beta ‘nice guy’ who keeps the lights on and society ticking over? a kind of “fuck that, why should I feel guilty for rejecting these beta sperges. here, let them have an invading hoard, that’s how much sympathy I should feel towards them…. also, fuck you dad.”

* The Eskimo Psychiatrists seized on some weird personality flaw in the Northern European Lutheran/Jesuit germanic character, wherein they will dutifully & enthusiastically [& even ferociously] parrot whichever dogma they are fed at any particular moment in time, so that, without blinking an eye, the Lutheran/Jesuit can instantaneously flip from screaming, “Hail H!tler” to screaming, “Religion is the opiate of the masses!”

* As far as I can tell, Henriette Reker [mayorette of Cologne] is childless & barren, and we know that Angela Merkel is childless & barren. Lately whenever I talk to people in large organizations, with terrible bureaucratic problems, it’s almost always childless people [s0d0mites, spinsters, Eskimos, etc] who are causing the most damage. Childlessness seems to exist at an insane nexus of mental illness & aspirituality & outright amorality – the childless probably got that way because they hated children, and, conversely, because they have no children, they have nothing invested in the FUTURE, ergo they are free to loot and burn everything in the present, the future be d@mned.

* And you’re onto something about aging, barren women. An old boss–nice looking Japanese lady; great rack for an asian–was barren, waited too long to have kids and at one point, when a girl was leaving, she said another was leaving the nest.

She, in many ways, treated co-workers, those that worked under her, as her kids. I don’t wanna bash her too much as she was a great lady, still is, but that was her Achilles heel. She wanted to be friendly and nice and cordial to everyone and in a supervisory role, that’s not effective.

She always doted on me and I just liked her for her rocking bod, but one time, us co-workers were out and she had been with us but had to go home to hubby and co-workers straight up asked if we were having an affair. They were essentially saying I had her wrapped around my finger and could have had my way.

Looking back on it, I could have. Shit, probably still can. But, saw photos of her recently and the asian-wall delay kicked in. Still, would probably bang.

I should put this into a short story. Has a quasi-Oedipal Rex aspect to it.

* Short story: our entire HR dept is 2/3 flamer now that we just hired a new maricon.

* Those comments raise some uncomfortable questions about the significant role that White women are playing in supporting and facilitating the migrant-invasion of Europe. It can’t be denied.

How are we to treat such traitors and collaborators among our own? After all, these women might be our girlfriends or wives, mothers or sisters. How do we punish the guilty?

In many cases, of course, these stupid bitches invite their own punishment. Which I suppose is a kind of justice.

* Contrast = alpha. The issue is not with the women, they are wired this way, the fault is in the men acting on their displeasure whether politically, economically or violently. The men can’t just sit back and observe passively, then go post about it. Take back the dinner table, the classroom and the pew as a start. That alone will demonstrate contrast and alpha among your own.

* Reassert traditional male prerogatives. Remove their right to vote, roll back female (in fact all) affirmative action, reintroduce slut-shaming, kinder, kuchen und kirche.

* Feminism, Inc. is silent about the wave of sex assaults on German women. There is some press play about our female scientists being “forced to endure” gauntlets of horny astronomers and how that deprives them the opportunity to make important contributions to their chosen field of study.

How would the feminist media react if we suddenly allowed 10 million hot asian female refugees to immigrate?

* I just saw The Martian, and I know for a fact that women are now the commanders and expert navigators of NASA…

… and what they can’t do, magic negroes are picking up the slack… especially in maths, which is hard for girls.

And astronauts engage in lively banter and repartee of the street kind, especially in mission-critical situations.

And let’s not forget, if a decision is made by the older White guy in charge, it’s bound to blow up in everyone’s face.

And even in the Orient, it’s the hot young woman who will let the senior man in charge of the space program know what’s what.

* Thought experiment: if it were mobs of athletic, blond Danish men running around with savagery equal to that of the Cologne muds last week, would a significant fraction of the German girls steal away with them for make-out and bangs?

* Did anyone ever see that John Cusack movie `Gross Point Blank`? He plays a hitman and in an effort to justify his job he says “Put it this way: if I turn up at your door, chances are you did something to bring me there.”

We, the men of the West, have dropped the ball in a big way and the only way out is to grow up and reassert ourselves. Personally, I think we’re looking at civil war, fighting in the streets, terror etc. A lot of people are going to get hurt.

* If only men had the vote, the cucks would still rule Germany.

If only women had the vote, Fidesz and Jobbik would still dominate the polls in Hungary.

Academia, entertainment and the media are the most important factors in the murder (not suicide) of the West.

* White women’s interests aren’t the same as white men’s because WW don’t have their own Y chromosome to protect. If they are raped at least one of their X’s gets in the progeny. So European Man is on his own if he values his genetic Y inheritance. Women’s rights, civil rights, none of that preserves his Y chromosome; so he better turn into a summamabitch to protect it.

* Interesting point which is why women can never be fully trusted to be loyal to their nation or people.

Half the rapist child is hers, thus she will accept it and love it.

Women should not vote let alone run nations.

* Get used to real rape culture. More rapes of teenage girls, age 14 and 15. Multiculturalism, yo. Police attacked too. More women having to run gauntlets of men.

If women and men weren’t indoctrinated in slut culture, if German girls were sweeter and nicer a lot more men would defend the homeland.

If you’re a good, honest, honorable man, what chance do you have with young white women nowadays? None, in the West. Yet the invaders get full access, voluntary or not.

Who are the white women running to for help now that North Africans have arrived for their poosy? Yeah, that’s right. In the future they better know who provides their freedom and security… if it’s not too late.

The good news is we just hit peak feminism. Feminism maxed out in 2015 on New Year’s Eve. One way or the other white women are going to have a big drop in their freedom. Coming soon to an area near you.

2016 and on, whether it’s going to be African or European men ruling white women is now the only remaining question.

* If there is a psycho-sexual element at work here, I would suggest that it its more on the order of a collective “let’s you and him fight”. Inviting in the orcs is subconsciously designed to provoke the inner Dunedain of your typical millennial neckbeard to man up.

Women may get the tingles from an abstract and remote sexual threat, but palpable sexual danger is another story (none of those women in Koln looked like they were having fun). Also, few European women of quality want want anything to do with Muslims. No matter how dominant they may appear, no culture that widely practices FGM, among other aspects of true misogyny, can be considered eugenically healthy.

Before her death, Italian journalist Oriana Falaci (a sort of 1970s vintage Camille Paglia), wrote provocatively about all this after 911 in “The Rage and the Pride”. So provocatively, in fact, that she got haulled up on chargers before some fey “Human Rights” Commission. Unlike the modern left, she understood the sexual imperative behind jihad.

* There is no contradiction between the women of Europe throwing open their borders (legs) to the invaders and the MSM projecting images of only women and children migrants. It is an ASD cover mechanism to rationalize the female lust for the horde.

* I think its more a case of virtual signalling. Middle class, female liberals signalling their superior virtue to us. The strongest support for refugees come from those women in the middle class and above who never have to actually put up with these men, whereas in working class districts women aren’t all the keen at all on the influx.

* Open borders means open legs, so spread ’em sweetheart.

* I am grateful that the Château is analyzing all these political agendas in the world that point to racial suicide. I absolutely agree with the Château’s analysis of this. For me, the analysis works on two levels. I agree with his assessment of the Muslim invasion being helped along by women and often the white women who are helping it along are not consciously aware of the needs and the agenda born out of the reptilian part of the brain. But, non-awareness neither negates the reality nor the motivation. However, I also see another thing coming into play here if one looks at this through the lens of the agenda of the NWO. If you believe in that stuff, you will recall that the NWO hopes to strip everyone of racial markers and racial pride so that the NWO can control the population on a grand scale. Since women determine the color of the tribe, it is best to appeal to women in the situation. For example, when a man impregnates a woman of another race and then comes back to his own tribe, he is spreading his genetics into that other tribe but it does not affect his tribe. On the other hand, if a white woman has a child with a non-white man, that child is now part of the Caucasian tribe and it muddies the waters within the Caucasian tribe. Another tribe’s genetics gain entrance. Therefore, if you want to destroy the white race and the white culture, you will appeal to white women. And because of all of the things operating within women that the Château describes, it could be easy to manipulate white women to usher in the much larger agenda. I don’t see this going as planned because I think some women, especially ones who are race realists, will see through it. As for me, there is nothing that could be done to me in order to make me change my mind about being fiercely supportive of the success of Caucasian men.

* I will just copy paste several comments, that were very interesting to me, by a swede with nick “Jack Burton” that comments at Zerohedge.

“And blaming women is not popular. It will not get you a date. But in Europe, women have taken over society in nearly every sense. Men are worse feminists than the women. It is a proven fact the the people most active in Migrant welcoming organizations, feeding stations, mangers of temp. housing, and demonstrating for migrants rights. Most of them are middle age women without any husbands. Watch videos from Europe carefully, you will see hundreds of migrant young men, and it is always the white middle aged woman who is handing them bread, or serving the soup. In the Calais migrant camp it is a few Middle Age French women who keep the migrants fed. They come every day to do what they can for thousands of young single Islamic men.”

“These women all have college degrees in feminism and social welfare theory. They want migrants as that employs women in the social services. Liberal and leftists women whose jobs are in government and social welfare.”

“I already posted about the Swedish woman who befriended a group of young male migrants on a Swedish train. They drank together and sang songs and she got to know these new Swedes. Then she was gang rapped by them. So what does she do? She remains reluctant to file charges, do to the fact that “They are refugees and they might have a different culture, and it is hard for them.”

“Jesus, that is all you need to know about Women in Europe. And notice who is always out front to help migrants and to welcome them. Yes, usually middle age to 60 year old single women. They have nothing, no family, so they adopt migrants as their cause, expecting migrants to love them in return.”

“I told you it was this bad, but no! It really is worse. In many small towns, the migrants prowl the streets while locals stay home. Letting children, young girls out of the house is now impossible. And guess what? Swedish feminists are fighting hard for Migrants rights, demanding borders stay open and more taxes be put on people. Women is Sweden have most of the political power, they have spoken. “Open borders” “Cancel Swede’s rights to accomodate islamic culture” “rape is the fault of cultural differences”

I said this before, and got my ass ripped open for it. But here it goes. “If MEN do not take back political power in Europe, away from the women, and institute a defense of Swedish culture, then it is all over”.

“The stupidity of a raped Swedish woman to not want to get the migrants in trouble because she feels sorry for them. You know where that comes from? Brainwashing leftist tachers in Swedish schools.”

“The locals are told that these newcomers will boost the economy and improve life by bring their diverse culture to Swedes. Anyone daring to say a word about it is attack by the feminists who call them nazis. This migration is very much a migration of young single black and arab men, 80-90% are 15-35 Male. The major social supporters in Sweden, those who greet migrants, protest for open borders, work in refugee centers, hand out food, and generally work to welcome the migrants are ” Women , single , aged 40-65. Middle aged women. Now if you knew personally who was out thee fighting for more migration, you would know them as loser feminists spinsters. It is actually a joke in Sweden when you see a middle aged woman handing out gifts and foods to 25 year old Black Migrants.”

Posted in Diversity, Feminism | Comments Off on Men Invade, Women Invite

Future Leaders Of America Call To Abolish Freedom Of Speech And Press

Return of Kings:

The very convincing US satirist Ami Horowitz has gotten dozens of Yale University students to support his petition to stop free speech by repealing the First Amendment of the US Constitution. Horowitz has a history of outing some very sad college hypocrisies, such as when students at UC Berkeley, obsessed with rooting out the real evils of mansplaining and manspreading, reacted indifferently to him waving an ISIS flag on campus. They resorted to attacking him for waving an Israeli flag that same day.

His latest experiment portends very badly for college environments already clamping down on free speech, even with the current constitutional protections of the First Amendment. Focused on their pet projects of avoiding microaggressions and erecting an ideological missile defense shield of trigger warnings, the Yale students signing the petition seemed to forget that the First Amendment also protects both freedom of religion and the press.

For political rookies, this includes the ability of Jezebel and Feministing to publish articles, however retrograde, and the safety of Muslims in practicing their religion. No matter. I’m sure the Yale crowd had the best of intentions.

Is anyone sounding the alarm bells yet?

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Future Leaders Of America Call To Abolish Freedom Of Speech And Press