Is Rabbi Menachem Weiss’s Arrest Just The Tip Of The Rabbinic Molestation Iceberg?

Posted on April 3, 2018 by Luke Ford

On March 26, 2018, an email circulated around the Los Angeles Orthodox community from “Torah Truth”:

Dear Leaders:

As many of you are aware, Menachem Weiss of Nessah Synagogue was
arrested and indicted over the weekend. He is being charged with two
counts of aggravated sexual assault of a minor boy, which New Jersey
specifically requires an allegation of rape through penetration.

As concerning as this particular allegation is, it has come to our
attention that this behavior is far from isolated. There likely are
other victims, including in Los Angeles, who are ashamed or afraid of
coming out.

Here is what we know and what we believe would be prudent at this time:

1) Weiss comes from a family of individuals that historically have
been involved in molestation issues.

2) His brother is a convicted child molester and many other family members have also been put under similar suspicion.

3) Weiss was fired by NJ Chabad for similar conduct and, at a minimum, Nessah should have conducted due diligence and contacted them.

4)…[deleted]

5) There are various organizations out there that have been familiar
with Weiss’s actions, but they have been hampered in the past from
doing anything. Weiss’s reputation is well known in the Lubavitcher
community

6) Perhaps they should conduct due diligence and reach out to Jewish
Community Watch (JCW).

I wouldn’t speculate on such serious matters if the known facts weren’t so disturbing and pointing to a pattern. Here are some of my questions: Is R. Menachem Weiss’s case just the tip of a major abuse scandal involving his family and relatives? Was he a victim of bad behavior and did that predispose him to bad choices? Does he have siblings who were not just victims of molestation but perpetrators of bad behavior? Did their Orthodox Jewish community repeatedly look away from the abuse and enable it?

A source tells me: “I saw your video on Rabbi Weiss. I have a bit more insight [on rabbinic sex abuse]… Sexual abuse is considered a “rite of passage”… Rabbi [Menachem] Weiss suffered horrible abuse…. The worst abuser now lives in …[and he is still] abusing children…. This has been going on and on… One of his brothers is dead. He was so abused…”

“It goes on and on. It’s not just that family. Its what happens when you ask people to defy nature… A woman [has many] kids she didn’t care for and she beat them and no locks on doors so they would go into the rooms of the sisters and younger brothers and rape them and act like nothing happened…”

“It was reported in school in Miami Beach. They molested so many kids. They had dead beat self entitled abusive parents that would put them to work and take all the money. That included baby sitting. There is a lot more to the story than you know. It’s unreal that more people have not come forward. This is huge problem in the ortho community. Until you stop the abuse it will go on and on generation after generation. And the abuse never ended. Meanwhile the brothers are all on positions that involve young boys. The goal should be to end that.”

Posted in Abuse, R. Menachem Weiss | Comments Off on Is Rabbi Menachem Weiss’s Arrest Just The Tip Of The Rabbinic Molestation Iceberg?

WSJ: The Theory Behind That Charlottesville Slogan ‘The Jews will not replace us,’ they chanted. What do they mean, ‘replace us’?

Posted on April 3, 2018 by Luke Ford

Oxford PhD student Nathan Cofnas responds to my inquiry: “Miller might be right–he probably is right–but this article standing alone is not very convincing. These half-baked refutations of MacDonald aren’t really helpful.”

Abraham Miller (retired political science professor) writes in the Wall Street Journal:

He further argues that Jews are genetically programmed to undermine Christian civilization. Intellectual movements such as multiculturalism and liberalism serve, in his view, to heighten Jewish advantage because a Christian majority mired in a multicultural society is less likely to foster anti-Semitism.

Which brings us to his explanation of the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965. Mr. MacDonald claims that Jewish communal organizations led the effort to enact the law, which eliminated preferential quotas for Western European immigration and increased the total number of immigrants. That led to an increase in non-European immigration. In Mr. MacDonald’s view, the act started the “replacement” of white Christians by a more ethnically diverse population.

It is true that Jewish communal organizations are major supporters of multiculturalism. Then again, so are most mainstream churches, on both sides of the papal divide. Christian communal groups loudly extol their commitment to inclusion and diversity.

But Jewish leadership was neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for the passage of the 1965 immigration law. Rather, a liberalizing wave had already swept the West in the decades after World War II, bringing an end to colonialism and informing U.S. competition with the Soviet Union. In this context, America’s 1924 immigration law, which favored Western European immigration, had become an international embarrassment.

As early as 1952, President Harry Truman appointed a Commission on Immigration and Naturalization, whose report served as the foundation for the 1965 act. The report affirmed the country’s need for workers, but and it was highly critical of the foreign-policy problems caused by the then-current immigration policy. The report specifically cited Radio Moscow’s use of America’s exclusionary immigration policy to spread anti-Americanism in Asia, especially Korea.

The 1965 law’s chief sponsors were Sen. Philip Hart of Michigan and Rep. Emanuel Celler. Hart was Catholic; Celler had three Jewish grandparents and one Catholic one. Would Mr. MacDonald say Celler’s Jewish and Catholic genes were in conflict over immigration policy?

One of the most significant provisions of the act allowed chain migration, in which immigrants sponsor family members to come to America. Rep. Michael A. Feighan of Ohio, a conservative Democrat and Catholic, was responsible for this measure. He saw chain migration as promoting family values.

The bill passed overwhelmingly, with support from 85% of Republicans and 74% of Democrats. Sen. Edward Kennedy, a Catholic, was a major proponent and legislative orchestrator of the bill. President Lyndon Johnson, who belonged to the Disciples of Christ, signed the bill at the Statue of Liberty. Jewish support was not the key to its passage. The bill was widely popular—and more so with Republicans, even though most Jews, then as now, were Democrats.

From the WSJ comments:

* The multicultural theory makes no sense. How does bringing in millions of Muslim immigrants who are bigtime Jew-haters help the Jews advance their supposed master plan? Doesn’t seem to be working out too well for the Jews of France, Belgium, Holland, Germany, etc. Who are facing Pogrom levels of danger with the daily harassment, threats and assaults on their communities.

* Our 1924 law had become an “international embarrassment”? That is a good reason for change?

What is missing in the article is emphasis on the year of the new law’s passage: 1965. That was a year of massive righteousness about sins, real or imagined. Medicare and the Voting Rights Act were passed that year too, were they not? Chain migration from Mali was favored over the immigration of able Europeans. That was not rational policy; it was fanciful self-righteousness, perhaps even the birth of multiculti, with unforeseen but forseeable outcomes.

* Nicholas Wade, in his book Before the Dawn, advances a theory to the effect that the exclusion of European Jews from agriculture and most trades effectively confined them to economic activities that required highly expressed intellectual traits. This would have occurred over a short period (seven or eight centuries).

In defense of this idea, Wade points out that many of the dangerous genetic diseases that occur far more frequently among Ashkenazi Jews than among other populations also correspond closely with highly expressed intellectual traits. That fits the model of a hastily evolved response to a harsh environment.

* All this paranoia and suspicion about a religion that is rapidly assimilating and at the current rate will soon lose almost all distinction from the dominant, post-Christian culture.

* Not necessarily true. Orthodox Jews remain true to their faith and vehemently oppose miscegenation, which the Old Testament characterizes as a sin.

“Thou shalt not sow thy vineyard with two kinds of seed; lest the fullness of the seed which thou hast sown be forfeited together with the increase of the vineyard.” -Deuteronomy 22:9.

* This is a strange opinion piece, given that the Charlottesville events were quite some time ago, and that the essay ends up talking about the 1965 Immigration Act for the most part.

I would interpret the slogan as follows: “the Democratic party, the MSM, the universities, and the entertainment industries are run by those, including a highly disproportionate percentage of Jewish people, who have a common, conscious agenda of reducing whites to a cultural and literal minority in the US”.

As for this – “It is true that Jewish communal organizations are major supporters of multiculturalism.” -, this does not seem to be the case in Israel, does it?

Kevin MacDonald vs Nathan Cofnas (3-29-23)

JQ Debate: Nathan Cofnas Critiques Kevin MacDonald (4-17-18)

STANDING ON A WOOD CRATE, CRITIQUING NATHAN COFNAS ON KMAC (3-25-18)

Nathan Cofnas: Still No Evidence for a Jewish Group Evolutionary Strategy (1-8-23)

Nathan Cofnas Interview March 20, 2018

JF Gariepy’s Review Of The Nathan Cofnas Critique

JF Gariepy’s Review Of The Nathan Cofnas Critique II

The Cofnas Critique Gets A Challenge From Historian J. Otto Pohl (2-16-19)

The Cofnas Critique Gets A Challenge From Historian J. Otto Pohl II

Oxford University’s Nathan Cofnas Critiques KMAC’s Culture Of Critique Book (3-10-18)

Posted in Alt Right, Jews, Kevin MacDonald | Comments Off on WSJ: The Theory Behind That Charlottesville Slogan ‘The Jews will not replace us,’ they chanted. What do they mean, ‘replace us’?

Paul Nehlen Doxxed Ricky Vaughn (Douglass Mackey) Yesterday

Posted on April 3, 2018 by Luke Ford

From 4Chan’s Pol:

* Paul Nehlen has gone from challenging Paul Ryan for a seat in congress to being a Gab-tier white nationalist mud slinger engaged in the doxing of his political opponents.

TRS realizing they created an idiot by feeding red pills to a boomer.

Let me say this again, as a spic, I have never felt more comfortable in my future in this country. Watching the leaders of “white consciousness,” self-destruct is both a privilege and a pleasure.

* Paul Nehlen and Cantwell have gone full fucking retard. They are constantly getting gaslit on the gab echo chamber. 50% of the people they are interacting with are probably fucking feds for fucks sake.

Nehlen has been fucking toast for a while now. The fucking retard was supposed to run for office and talk about white issues. Not go on tangents about Jews in the pornography industry. He is truly a fucking moron and deserves absolutely nothing.

* Paul Nehlen went insane lol, this guy was a successful businessman with a family and money and now he is a gab white nationalist doxxing people who are mean to him online.

* Nah this is a classic case of knowing a shit ton of facts but not knowing what to do with them. Cantwell was always bound to go full retard with WN just like he did with HHH libertarianism. His only chance was to be deliberately shielded from some of this knowledge.

Should have just pushed Italian style fascism on him instead.

* Nehlen has OD’d on red pills and went off the deep end.

He’s a liability now who can’t be trusted with personal information, time to cut the cord.

* No decent person is going to be involved openly in radical politics. They were all burned the moment they called themselves white nationalists. The people who will make the changes they want will have heard their message and lived their lives appropriately having nothing to do with the alt right or white nationalist ‘movements’.

* Ironically Weev, who is a complete psycho, is actually the most tempered and intelligent of the bunch.

These guys were given basically the keys to the store, and allowed to gain influence. Both of them completely self destructed themselves in a damaging way, because they couldn’t handle the redpill.

I’ve seen this lots of times before. When you meet someone and look them in the eye, you always think well of them. You don’t realize that this person might actually be someone completely psycho. I know liberals who’ve met black people in their personal life have this same trusting forwardness, they never inquire further to find out what this black guy is doing in his personal time (robbing shit, selling drugs….etc)

What the TRS guys did to Cantwell was amazing, you forcibly converted him. But then you just opened the door for him to set up shop in your house, which was a bad move. The fact that he swung his ideology so radically with so little prompting should be evidence to how easily manipulated and suggestible he is, a very weak personality type to go right along with his jawline.

Paul Nehlen, I mean I thought this guy had it down pretty well. But then he just went off the reservation. I guess he got too sucked into the bubble of the movement, and stopped considering how he looked to outsiders. Part of the blame as to lie with him, but I think part of it is Jazzhands and others not giving him the proper direction to cool his jets.

You don’t want these people representing what you’ve got. Just look at the discussions we have on /pol/ they are funny, complex and interesting, and rich with historical knowledge. This kind of rich discussion is what should be happening on the alt-right. Instead it’s devolving, being weighed down by all this other bullshit. Is the ethno-state really your only idea? Warski even got bored of it, and he’s our guy.

* Yeah they can still affect things but the chain of influence right now goes like this.

0) Edgy memes generated for decades
1) Radical alt right elements expose kikes & anti whites
2) The message is moderated by alt right elements who aren’t full retards
3) These talking points then get picked over by tradthots & Cernovich types
4) Someone main stream like Tucker or a Fox anchor makes some dog whistles
5) Normies look into shit and discover all the memes, stories, etc and spread that shit.

This is pretty much how the South Africa stuff went down. As long as everyone plays their role in the chain it works but you can’t have motherfuckers overstepping themselves.

* Yea, the idea that Ricky Vaughn is some kind of master influencer controlling TRS and TDS, is wignat retardation.

Enoch and Anglin are disassociating their enterprises from the wignats because they’re objectively liabilities, proven by cuck box, Cantwell talking to feds, and now this doxxing, not because of Ricky Vaughn

* The alt right’s strategy is pretty much Jewish. For the most part they just want to rally and “raise awareness”, but when it comes to getting actual work done, they expect the goyim to do it for them. All they care about is networking and talking. When someone actually does something to destroy our enemies they disavow, disavow, disavow. They throw them under the bus. They are fucking autistic as hell too, they siphon money away from people to support their stupid podcasts instead of building up money to acquire territory and build infrastructure.

FROM TRS:

* Never go full Gab.

* I’m not new to the movement but I’m new to forums, paying attention to names/leaders, etc.

Was it always this toxic under the surface from jump?

This is just…I mean I think a man can be forgiven for using gay words like disgusting, vile, and gasp hateful.

* No, it’s never been like this. Even at the worst of infighting.

Most of that got solved by mutual separation, and wifegate never had them chasing after literally everyone.

* When I joined this thing everyone came together, working class and all, and showered Millenial Woes with moral support, money, and spare bedrooms with no time table.

Now we’re doxing our friends.

I’m texting mom and asking her if I should quit my time in HATE. Will report back.

* I’m definitely an optics-cuck, but Nehlen is an example of how even great external presentation can be pointless when you become a tactless sperg who forgets how to convince normal people of our ideas.

* I guess when we summoned the beast of white identity we should’ve thought about what would happen when it made its way down the bell curve lol. Oops.

* This isn’t an optics issue anymore, it’s behavior/actions. Optics is quite a bit further down the list of priorities.

* The “dox yourself and fight in the streets” cucks turn to doxing those they perceive as not on their team.

I regret i had but one dox to give, borthers.

Hopefully they are as inept at this as they are at activism and recruitment.

* Doxing is unforgivable, this shouldn’t even have to be said.

But reading through the thread I do have to say that there are a lot of us here that are optics-cucks personally(I always have conducted myself in a way that Anglin and RV would approve of) that are still very uneasy with attacking white advocates because the fire spreads out of control quickly. It took 1.0 20 or 30 years to destroy itself with infighting, at this trajectory we are looking at 2-3 years. It is a terrible strawman to lump anyone pointing this out in with TWP or siege-posters.

Posted in Alt Right, Articles | Comments Off on Paul Nehlen Doxxed Ricky Vaughn (Douglass Mackey) Yesterday

CBC: Israel PM freezes UN deal to send African migrants to Western countries

Posted on April 2, 2018 by Luke Ford

News:

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Monday he was putting on hold an agreement with the UN refugee agency to relocate thousands of African migrants to Western countries.

Hours after announcing the deal, which was opposed by right-wingers as it would give thousands of migrants the right to stay in the country, Netanyahu posted a message on his Facebook page saying he was putting it on hold until further review.

According to the agreement, about 16,000 of 37,000 African migrants who entered the country illegally would be relocated to Western nations while others would be allowed to stay in Israel.

Steve Sailer writes: “This is reminiscent of the crazy deal that Australia struck with Obama that Trump got stuck with: Australia, like Israel, has shown a lot of backbone in resisting illegal immigration. But when the New York Times and its powerful allies started a campaign against Australian citizens’ right of democratic self-determination, Australia’s prime minister came up with the clever plan of dumping its illegal aliens on America.”

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Our great ally Israel says “Bite the pillow, I’m going in dry!”

* This will be portrayed in the Israeli media as a victory for the open borders forces (supported by US Jews), who will be happy if none of those 16,000 refugees ever actually leave. Who’s going to force them – the UN?

* They have to understand this isn’t going to stop the flow into Israel. You make it to Israel and get a free trip to Canada, isn’t that better than staying in Israel for the overwhelming majority of these economic migrants?

* My understanding of the deal between Australia and the US is that Australia take more Central Americans in return than the boat people and the US is given the right to vet them however they want, theoretically being able to accept none if they so choose. Turnbull basically tried to tell the last part to Trump in their phone call.

* The whole thing is unseemly, but ultimately it is the fault of Canada and the like for being so cucked that they would accept the migrants.

This century will be the century of African hot potato. I just wish that the first world could work together so that no one would have to take any of them.

* This is actually a complete surrender of Israel, we are going to grant visas to tens of thousands of infiltrators (there are always more ready to come out of the woodwork than are mentioned in these announcements), the UN promise of taking 16000 off our hands is completely empty, they have no power and no desire to do anything of the sort. But I’m glad that at least in Nazi-land, we’ve got everyone sewn up.

* It’s people in the West wagging their fingers at Israel for planning to deport them to Africa. The plan was popular in Israel polling 60% plus. Protests in Israel while large consisted of Africans & the usual suspects in the academic class.

Canada already agreed to take 500 or so. If the West is going to butt into the affairs of sovereign nations then why shouldn’t they take them?

Maybe the West should just shut up and leave countries alone? Brilliant master stroke by Netanyahu just wondering why he didn’t go for broke and dump all of them in Canada the rest of them?

* Apparently there was a lot of haggling with the UN behind the scenes. At first they only agreed to take 1 out of every 5 migrants.

This is not an alt-right scenario of Jewish ZOG domination, but yet another instance of national sovereignty being compromised by the liberal globalist order. Netanyahu wanted to start deporting Africans to Africa today, not to become beholden to the UN for the next five years. His base will be pissed off.

* According to the Israeli government, the flow into the country has largely been stopped by their Sinai fence. Of course, the lure of asylum in a more welcoming country than Israel may cause more Africans to try for the border in the hopes that the Israelis will let them in rather than permit them to die in the desert. A move that encourages attempted border-hopping seems quite odd in light of Israel’s recent defense of the Gaza border.

* Israel did want to get a rid of them all, and send them back to Africa but the UN put a stop to that. Some UN refugee and resettlement agency put a lot of pressure on the African countries that were going to take the uncooperative ones in exchange for cash.

* This isn’t a Jewish plan. Israel had been deporting them back to Africa, and built a wall that successfully stopped more from coming in.

The UN, which hates Israel, tried to stop the African nations from cooperating. This “compromise” was hatched by various UN members that are anti Israel and the EU which is the biggest funder of Israel’s enemies in the West Bank and Gaza.

This is all explained in this article and with background information about Israel’s african migrants amply covered.

But the knee-jerk anti Semites are too lazy to bother reading this.

* Seems like a raw deal for Israel.

Instead of deporting all 32,000+ illegal Africans back to Africa, Israel has instead agreed to grant residency rights to 16,000+ while attempting to foist the other 16,000+ on other western nations.

Prime Minister Netanyahu and his political allies I think would have much preferred to stick with the original plan of deporting all the illegal Africans back to Africa. I suspect that “human rights” agitation on the part of the usual suspects made that plan unworkable in the end, so Netanyahu went for what he must have thought was the second-best deal: ‘if a bunch of busy-bodies are going to try to make this Israel’s problem, the least I can do is make it their problem as well.’

But Netanyahu has his priorities right: First build the wall and cut off the flow of all new illegal immigrants. Then try to deport as many existing illegal immigrants as possible. Only last do you hold your nose and cut a bad compromise deal covering the last remaining group within your borders.

President Trump can learn from this: First build the wall. Then deport everyone you can get your hands on. Then, finally, cut some idiotic deal to cover the remaining DACA-types whom you haven’t managed to dislodge. In that order.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on CBC: Israel PM freezes UN deal to send African migrants to Western countries

Color Lines: Is the ‘Alt-Right’ on Its Last Leg?

Posted on April 1, 2018 by Luke Ford

Spencer Sunshine writes:

Influence is difficult to quantify. But it seems to me—someone who has been tracking White nationalism for more than a decade—that the alt-right has declined after Charlottesville. With the arrests, job and education losses and mainstream ostracism of often young participants, alt-right organizing projects have moved from celebratory to cautious. There have also been material consequences. In particular, numerous digital platforms suspended alt-right accounts. The top neo-Nazi alt-right website, the Daily Stormer, was driven to the edges of the Internet.

Richard Spencer, the alt-right’s poster boy for intellectualizing White supremacy, tried to turn the situation around with what he called a “Danger Zone Tour” of universities. Many of the early 2017 clashes were at universities, and the publicity fueled the alt-right. But Spencer’s tour was a bust. Last April, he successfully forced Alabama’s Auburn University to host him and hundreds of students attended. But by October 2017, his University of Florida in Gainesville talk was met with a one-two punch of clashes outside the school and heckling, Spencer stormed off the stage. After the talk, some of his followers were arrested for shooting at anti-racists. Spencer’s next appearance, at Michigan State University in March 2018, cemented his downward spiral. A lawyer that Spencer was working with, Kyle Bristow, resigned after media scrutiny. Clashes broke out outside of the venue, but only a handful of students actually attended the talk.

Matthew Heimbach, whose TWP provided security to Spencer at Michigan State, tried to get in on the collegiate speaking action in February. He gave a talk called “National Socialism or Death” at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville that was supposed to be the first in a tour, but the crowd was mostly non-student supporters and media.

Heimbach’s TWP had been a steady source of support for Spencer’s rallies. It was an unusual alliance—the two had had a falling out previously, and Heimbach was close to the older KKK and Nazi skinhead groups that Spencer has distanced himself from. But Heimbach led the only group White nationalist group that would consistently bring a couple dozen members out who would be willing to engage in fisticuffs. Groups that had fought alongside White nationalists during the clashes at the beginning of 2017, such as Gavin McInnes’s Proud Boys and right-wing paramilitary groups like the Oath Keepers, didn’t want to be seen with Spencer. And while Spencer was good at grabbing headlines, he didn’t show any talent as a political organizer. Identity Evropa, an alt-right group that adopted his preppy aesthetic, took a decidedly non-confrontational turn after Charlottesville. Spencer broke with them by forming his own group, Operation Homeland, which hasn’t gained any traction.

Shortly after Spencer’s disastrous Michigan appearance, Heimbach’s party disintegrated in a sex scandal. The married man was arrested on March 13 for battery, domestic battery committed in the presence of a child, strangulation and intimidation after he was caught having an affair with the wife of Matthew Parrott, his group’s spokesperson and web administrator. Parrott—who is also Heimbach’s father-in-law—resigned and said he was destroying the party’s website and membership records. While the TWP has not officially disbanded, it’s hard to imagine Heimbach making a comeback soon. Spencer is now left without reliable security.

These blows seem to have hit an already flagging alt-right hard. Spencer moaned to the media that “antifa is winning.” The alt-right’s ability to raise money has been greatly curtailed since most online donation-processing sites have shut them out. Only the small outlet MakerSupport continues to work with them.

Spencer and others are parties are the targets of a major lawsuit filed in the aftermath of Charlottesville. Arrests have piled up for alt-right activists. And their reputation for violence is mounting: the Southern Poverty Law Center claims that more than 100 people have been “killed or injured by alleged perpetrators influenced by the so-called ‘alt-right.’” The movement’s attacks on women’s participation—and accusations of abuse, including by Heimbach—have limited their recruitment possibilities.

Doxxing has isolated those who are not hardcore movement activists. While there was concern earlier in the year that Trump had re-normalized White nationalism to pre-Civil Rights Movement levels, the continued loss of employment and educational opportunies by people outed as White nationalists have shown this not to be true. In mid-March 2018, a Wells Fargo mortgage broker lost his job in Portland, Oregon, after an antifa group doxxed him. Uncommitted followers seem to be scared off at the possibility of losing their livelihood leaving only hardcore racist activists in the movement.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on Color Lines: Is the ‘Alt-Right’ on Its Last Leg?