Riley Weston Interview

Oct. 16, 2007

I spend two hours in a Sherman Oaks park with Riley Weston Tuesday afternoon.

Now 41, she’s never played anyone older than 18.

She was born Kimberlee Seaman on August 26, 1966.

According to imdb.com, she got her first credits in 1987. She was featured in the initial episodes of "Growing Pains" in 1988.

Pic Pic Pic Pic

Video Video II Video III Video IV Video V Video VI Video VII New Videos

Here’s her Wikipedia entry:

Riley Weston (born in Poughkeepsie, New York) is an actress and screenwriter who became embroiled in a debate about ageism in Hollywood, after it was discovered that she lied about her age to get work in the entertainment industry.

Weston had bit film and television roles as a young girl, including the 1980s sitcoms Growing Pains and Who’s the Boss?. In 1997, she legally changed her name to Riley Weston and began claiming her date of birth as 1979 in order to be considered for acting roles.

In 1998, at the age of 32, she began drafting screenplays and marketing herself to television studios as a recent high school graduate. (She claimed that her husband was her older brother.) She was soon hired by the WB Network as a writer for the show Felicity. Hailed as a child prodigy and "wunderkind," she was featured on Entertainment Weekly’s October 1998 "it list" of the "100 Most Creative People in Entertainment," which described her as an up-and-coming 19-year-old. Shortly thereafter, she was offered a half-million dollar screenwriting deal with Disney.

Her real identity and age were exposed after a Felicity producer checked Weston’s social security number. Soon after, her contract with WB expired and was not renewed, and her deal with Disney fell through. The story sparked much discussion about age bias in entertainment. Weston herself was quoted as asking "If I were getting a job in any other industry, do you think anyone would care how old I am?" She continues to work as an actress, singer, voiceover artist and author. Weston’s first novel, Before I Go, was published in September 2006.

"We grew up on three acres," says Riley. "I had horses. I had a dog and a cat."

"In my head, I had to get out [of her small town near Poughkeepsie]. There were two traffic lights. As far away as I could go was California, that was a great place to go.

"Now I can look back and it’s the greatest place ever. I go back every summer to the Adirondack Mountains. That’s what I call home."

Luke: "Your parents loved you?"

Riley: "Yep. They still do. My parents divorced [when Riley was a baby]. They have a great relationship."

"I’ve never had one drop of doubt from anyone in my family."

"When I decided to write a book [the novel ‘Before I Go‘] after 15 scripts, they said, ‘OK, how are you going to write a book?’ I said, ‘I’m just going to take my favorite script and I’m going to write it and I’m going to keep control of it and I’m going to star in it.’

"I didn’t set out to be a writer."

"I’ve always been very unique. I’ve always embraced my individuality."

"I think I embraced the talents that I have about a year ago."

Luke: "When did the first teacher say, ‘You’re a great writer’?"

Riley: "No one. Ever. The writing only came out eight years ago out of pure frustration as an actress over the scripts that came in."

Luke: "How would your best friends describe you in high school?"

Riley: "Determined. Really determined. I probably didn’t have many great friends because of that because I knew what I wanted to do. Most people, especially in a smaller town, probably don’t have that drive or that energy that says, ‘I’m not going to stay here. I’m outta here the second I can get myself organized. Then I’m not going to stay in this town and do what most people do — stay in this town, get married and have kids."

"Since age five, I knew that I wanted to do what they were doing on TV or in the movies. Whatever it took to get there, however long it took, that’s what I was going to do."

Riley graduated high school in 1984, spent a year in New York, and then moved to Los Angeles in 1985.

Luke: "When did you move to Los Angeles?"

Riley: "I don’t remember exactly. About 1993."

From Entertainment Weekly, Oct. 30, 1998:

Lying isn’t just for presidents. Meet Riley Weston, TV’s oldest whiz kid.

For 14 years, 32-year-old Riley Weston was just another struggling actress in Hollywood, going nowhere fast. Tired of waiting for the perfect part, she created it instead: teen writing prodigy on Felicity, The WB’s hit about an 18-year-old college freshman. She aced the part, too, delivering an Oscar-worthy performance capable of fooling a powerful studio (Disney), a network, a talent agency (United Talent Agency), and numerous publications, including this one (she appeared on our It List last June).

But reality and fantasy collided on Oct. 15: A former friend snitched, apparently angered at all the attention Weston was getting–not to mention her two-year, $300,000 development deal from Disney Touchstone TV. Faster than you can say Milli Vanilli, the phenom was unmasked as a fake.

Age wasn’t Weston’s only deception: She’d changed her name so many times she could adopt the Prince moniker "artist formerly known as…." Her birth name is Kimberlee Seaman, and Weston claims stalker problems instigated the aliases. But who knows if that’s true? She’s also told people she’s divorced from manager Brad Sexton, yet now she says they remain married.

…Weston had little trouble faking younger. At 4′ 11" and 93 pounds, with nary a wrinkle, she can easily pass for 19. She dresses the part (baggy jeans, sneakers) and acted it at work: According to Felicity staffers, she kept a Titanic poster on her office wall, brought her mom, Betsy (who Weston says was in on the deception), to work, and even professed to have a crush on Jonathan Taylor Thomas. "She seemed sweet, charming, a little needy, and searching for approval," says a Felicity exec. "We thought we [had found] a staffer who spoke the language."

Weston, who contributed to seven Felicity scripts before leaving the show (her option was up this summer), says fellow writers "treated me like they would any 19-year-old." But she hastens to add that "the person they knew is me. I talk like this, wear these clothes…. I challenge anybody to say I didn’t nail something as any teenager would have said it."

Perhaps a case can be made for arrested development. The Poughkeepsie, N.Y., native bolted to L.A. right after high school in 1984. Babysitting supplemented infrequent acting jobs–until 18 months ago, when she began writing "out of complete frustration [over] the misrepresenting [sic] of young people entirely." One of her scripts, about teenage sisters, was shopped around by UTA; Imagine TV bit and hired her for Felicity (coproduced by Touchstone).

From Time magazine, Oct. 26, 1998: "Any actress who can get away with trimming 13 years off her agewithout undergoing plastic surgery is bound to stir up someresentment. For several years, RILEY WESTON, a 32-year-old divorced actress and screenwriter, has been passing herself offas a 19-year-old, originally to get good roles and later to promote herself as a writing wunderkind. She successfully fooled her agent, the press, her colleagues and Disney, which recently signed her to a six-figure deal. Her secret was discovered last week when someone tipped off Entertainment Tonight that Weston, who wrote and guest-starred in an episode of the WB network’s teen drama Felicity, may be a better actress than anyone thought. She says she was able to maintain her ruse because she doesn’t have many friends. That may be one truth that grows into old age."

Bernard Weinraub writes for the January 1999 issue of Cosmopolitan:

Riley Weston was born Kimberlee Elizabeth Seaman in 1966. Her parents divorced and remarried, and Riley lived with her mother, a friendly woman who’s no taller than 5 feet 3 inches herself.

Weston grew up in Pleasant Valley, New York, and went to Arlington High School, where she was voted Most Popular and judged by yearbook editors to have the Nicest Smile in her class. She was a cheerleader for three years, in the chorus and drama clubs and was vice president of her senior class. A member of the high-school staff recalled Weston with fondness: "Kim was a friendly, outgoing girl who was very well-liked by everyone. I can’t imagine that she would ever scheme the way the papers have accused her of doing."

All along, her burning ambition was to be an actress. "She never wanted anything else," says Betsy Brown. While in high school, Kim went to New York City, knocked on casting agents’ doors, and hand-delivered head shots of herself. The move paid off in a few parts in community-theater plays and work as an extra on some soap operas.

After graduating in 1984, she moved to LA and started calling herself Kimberlee Kramer–it sounded more actressy, she felt, than Kimberlee Seaman. To support herself, she worked as a baby-sitter and nanny. As an actress, she found just enough success to keep her dream perking: a few commercials, some tiny roles on television shows.

It was in her late 20s that she began to feel the rub between her looks and her age and changed the age on her resume to 18. Says Brad Sexton, "As an actress, she’s been 18 for the last 10 years." When a stalker began harassing her, she changed her name again–to Riley Weston. By all accounts, Riley didn’t have much of a life outside of her career. She had few friends, rarely dated, and spent most of her time watching TV and movies, to study other actors and actresses. But in 1993, she met [manager Brad] Sexton in a local park. They were married soon after and split up two years later, staying friendly enough for her to keep him on as her manager.

…With Felicity behind her and her Disney contract in jeopardy, says Betsy Brown, Weston spends most of her time sitting in her apartment. She cries a lot.

"She’s terrified that this is going to be the end of her dream," says Brown. But Sexton doesn’t see Weston in the victim role for long. "She’s very optimistic. She’s so driven, more driven than anyone I’ve ever seen. And she’s immensely talented as an actress and singer. She knows exactly what she wants," he says.

"I feel badly about what Riley has gone through. I’m in part responsible for this. I was her manager. I encouraged it. I just thought it wasn’t any different from what is accepted practice in Hollywood."

Riley: "Why I lied about my age is simple — I’m an actor first. Actors lie about a lot of things, namely their age. When I kept getting older and started looking younger, it wasn’t even something I thought about. If they need a 14-year old and I look this part, I’ll say I was 18 and I’ll get the audition and I’ll book the part. Then the writing started. Not knowing there was huge age discrimination thing going on for writers… I didn’t think I’d last long… I’ll be a 19 year old writer. Who cares? If your writing is good and your acting is good, it doesn’t matter for an actor, it won’t matter for the writer. Apparently I was sorely mistaken.

"I ended up doing [Felicity] as a writer for six months. Then I booked an episode as an actor. There was a woman I worked with for four years before I started working a lot as an actor and writer, she decided it was in her best interest, after reading about a deal I got with Touchstone, to tell everybody about my age. She called everybody from every entertainment network…without any fair warning.

"I was leaving the show to go to the deal at Touchstone. I was going to talk to the president of Touchstone. You said in this meeting you don’t care if I’m 18 or 80. I’m neither.

"At the time, it destroyed everything I worked for."

"It’s been nine years. That would’ve destroyed anybody.

"I’m working more now than ever and I’m happier than ever. It’s sad that somebody felt they had to do that. On the other hand, it was going to come out eventually. I’m glad it did a long time ago. Now I can enjoy the rest of my life.

"That happened. If you want to talk about DUIs and the arrests and the things that people do that are illegal and endanger other people, this did not. Was it upsetting? Yes. Do I feel bad? Yes. If I had to do it again? I would. I’m an actor first. As an actor, I want to get the audition and to get the audition I had to lie about my age. It’s the same as saying, ‘You need someone with blue eyes? I’ll get contacts.’ Does it matter that my hair is dark brown and I dye it blonde? Does it matter if I’m 5′ and I say I’m 5’2" to get in the door?

"It’s the entertainment industry… If I entertained you, whether as an actor or a writer, and I did my job, I have a huge problem with someone saying that if I’m not a certain age, it makes a difference. It can’t. It shouldn’t. If it does, what kind of a world are we living in that we forget it’s entertainment?"

Luke: "I’m missing the lost years of Riley. You graduated high school in 1984. You say you came out here in 1993."

Riley: "It must’ve been before. I could call my mother and find out exactly."

Luke: "Were you doing a lot of drugs?"

Riley: "Ohmigod, no. I was a person by myself and hibernated in my apartment just because I didn’t know anybody. I think I was here during the riots. I think I watched it on TV."

Luke: "Did you blank out those years? Were they unpleasant?"

Riley: "Apparently. I don’t think they were unpleasant. I think I was alone and I was trying to figure it all out."

Luke: "Desperate years?"

Riley: "Any time you come to a place that’s foreign to you, that you don’t know anybody, and you’re trying to figure out your life, it’s some sort of desperation. I was very much in my shell at that point. I didn’t do anything."

Luke: "Who was president when you moved out here?"

Riley: "Are you serious? I don’t know."

Luke: "You got your first paying acting gigs around 1993?"

Riley: "Right. Maybe it was 1991. It could’ve been earlier."

Luke: "How did you eat?"

Riley: "My dad helped me when I first moved out here. A couple of commercials doesn’t pay too shabby when you get residual checks. I had a little apartment. I didn’t have a lot of expenses. I didn’t have a nice car like I do now. I started babysitting a lot… That’s how I met the woman who decided to out me."

Luke: "Where were you when you heard the news you were being outed?"

Riley: "I was in my trailer on the set of Felicity. I was working as an actor. I got a call from one of the trade magazines who said we were coming out with a story."

Luke: "Variety?"

Riley: "Yes."

Luke: "Who?"

Riley: "Jenny Hontz."

Eight months after Hontz published this story, she quit Variety and became the vice president of creative affairs at Disney’s Touchstone TV/ABC division. She lasted 15 months before returning to writing.

Riley: "It was just a message I got on my machine. Someone being extremely rude and very angry."

Luke: "The reporter was rude and angry?"

Riley: "Yes."

Luke: She asked for your comment?

Riley: "Not even. ‘We’re going forward with or without you.’"

Luke: "Did you call her back?"

Riley: "No. You’re talking about a girl from Pleasant Valley who just wanted to be an actress. And all I knew was it was OK to lie about your age to get in the door. Suddenly, not only was it not OK, I was on the verge of losing everything I had worked all my life for. And a huge deal that was on the table [at Touchstone] with my show that I wrote, star in it… It was probably the best time in my life.

"I called my attorney. He said, ‘We’ll stop that right now.’ I said, ‘Well, it’s true.’ It was extremely difficult for everybody involved. My agents didn’t know how to handle it."

I email Jenny Hontz: "[Riley] said you were extremely rude. I wondered if you had any memories of Riley and this story. Do you still have a copy of your story?"

Jenny Hontz responds:

Yes, I remember her. I’m sure in Riley’s mind, it was very rude of me to report the truth. You can find my articles about her on the Variety website…[Oct. 6, 1998 Oct. 15, 1998 Oct. 16, 1998].

Hontz was interviewed about the story on "60 Minutes" and "All Things Considered."

Jenny writes in the Oct. 15, 1998 edition of Variety:

Those who dealt with Weston say her age and her so-called "wunderkind" status were, in fact, used as major selling points. Kristi Kaylor, a senior vice president of creative affairs at Pacific Motion Pictures, who was initially attached as a producer to Weston’s TV script "Holliman’s Way," said she felt "conned."

"Yes, she told me she was 18. I thought she was this little genius," Kaylor said. "In negotiations, her attorney said, ‘Please don’t stand in the way of this poor 18-year-old’s career.’ She conned everybody."

Kaylor said she’s upset by the situation because "I introduced her to Showtime, to MTV — I put my reputation on the line."

…Weston’s decision to hide her age is being downplayed by some sources as a typical scenario in the youth-obsessed entertainment business. Kaylor’s attorney, Nancy Derwin, sees the situation as more serious, though.

"If a woman is willing to misrepresent herself, how do we even know her work is really her own writing?" Derwin asked.

Jenny writes in the Oct. 16, 1998 edition of Variety:

…Despite the apology, Weston remained defiant about her decision, stating that it is "accepted practice for actresses to lie about their age" and blaming Hollywood "age bias" for her feeling that it was necessary to lie.

…Weston’s rather innocent explanation of the events, however, masks the lengths to which the she went to perpetuate the deception. After changing her name, she created false identification to hide her true age, wore baggy clothing styles favored by teens and even brought her mother with her to meetings.

…Weston’s explanation for bringing her mother to meetings is that her mother is her "best friend," and she wears baggy clothes because "I’m very insecure about my body." Weston’s newly obtained public relations reps rationalize the fact that she falsified identification by saying that most college students have fake IDs, too.

…Weston herself remains unbowed: "I’m strong. I’m quirky. I’m weird, and I’m proud of it," she said.

Riley Weston: "Has it happened before? Yes. I’m not going to say who it’s happened to because it’s been swept under the rug. That many years? Probably not but they don’t look like me.

"There are going to be hundreds and thousands [of actors] after me who are going to do the same thing…

"Those were dark months and dark years after that. I’m suddenly hiring a crisis management publicist. It was suddenly watching myself do interviews that were completely manipulated to make it look like I thought it was funny. I didn’t think it was funny. I sent apology letters to everybody, from Imagine people (Ron Howard, Brian Grazer) to every person on Felicity… to the lowest person, to the PA, crafts service person, etc… I felt horrible. I was just an actress trying to get the audition."

"There were a lot of years after that where I thought I don’t know if this is what I’m meant to do. I’d like to think I’m a decent person who’d never hurt anyone and to go through that and be made a spectacle of was not what I intended. I just wanted to work. If you’re in this business, that’s what you’re thinking. Most do whatever they have to do to make that a reality. Some do things that are horribly inappropriate."

Luke: "So you did answer some interview requests?"

Riley: "I only answered those chosen by the publicist. I only did one electronic (Entertainment Tonight). It was strangely manipulated. I was laughing off camera with the reporter. You never know how someone is going to edit something… Everyone wanted to make it a bigger story…

"I did one print interview — Vanity Fair. They not only misprinted but outright lied about a lot of things. I had people they interviewed who called me afterward and said, ‘I never said that.’ They said I wore a pinafore to a meeting. I don’t know what a pinafore is. I had overalls. It was for an audition. I’m quoted as saying I wrote baby clothes before baby clothes were cool. I said ‘baggy clothes.’"

Luke: "Who was the reporter?"

Riley: "Ned Zeman.

"He tape recorded it so I know there were no misunderstandings."

The article appeared in the January 1999 issue of Vanity Fair.

"Youth Or Consequences: When youth-obsessed Hollywood thought Riley Weston was 18, the actress was showered with opportunities- a writing job and a guest role on the new Warner Bros. show ‘Felicity’ and a $500,000 deal with Disney. Her unmasking as an ancient 32 sent the entertainment industry into an uproar…"

Riley: "It taught me a lot about the business of Hollywood which I had no idea before this happened. It’s nasty. It can be cruel. It can be unfortunate. It can be full of lies. Me included. I lied. I’m the first one to take responsibility for that. Any time anyone asks me the truth about any project or script, I start off by saying, ‘We all know I lied once so I won’t do that again. I hate it and here’s why…’

"Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who won’t do that and cop to anything they have done."

"Do I wish anybody ill who interviewed me or lied or misprinted? No."

Luke: "Why not?"

Riley: "I’m really happy with my life. Those who live in that angry energy that want revenge, that want horrible things to happen to those who’ve done horrible things to them. What’s the point?

"My greatest day will be standing up on a stage one day and saying, ‘These are the people I’d like to thank: How many of you have said really mean stuff? Pretty much everybody. Everyone raise your hand. I thank all of you because you’ve made me this incredibly smart, incredibly talented, and incredibly strong person I never thought I was and gave me the opportunities I never would have had if you weren’t such boneheads.’

"No, I won’t say that part.

"My life is too great to wish bad things on other people."

Luke: "Can you relate to the delicious feeling it was for thousands of people when they saw you fall?"

Riley: "I would hope that most people would’ve related… I know that nine out of ten actors are lying about something… There were a tremendous amount of people that kept their mouth shut and did feel, not sympathy… I think a lot of people sat back and said, ‘That stinks.’ Because of what they do behind closed doors that they know not to be the truth. More people than not thought that’s too bad. They wouldn’t admit that because then people would say, ‘What are you lying about?’

"There are some people in this town that wait for the Britneys and Lindsays to fall…and that’s sad."

"It seems like such a waste of energy to put such negativity in other people’s lives."

Luke: "You don’t get any joy when you see people fall, like Britney and Lindsay?"

Riley: "I really don’t. I feel sympathy for them. You wonder where their families are… My family would never have allowed me to get to that point. They would’ve pulled me out of Hollywood so fast and put me in a place where they could smack some sense into me."

Luke: "Before this incident, did you get joy out of the destruction of other people?"

Riley: "I’d like to say no but maybe I did."

Luke: "It’s human. It’s as primal a human emotion as any… Your story was lying on the roadside [like a car wreck], what a great metaphor about Hollywood."

Riley: "Yeah."

Luke: "You don’t get joy out of gossiping about people?"

Riley: "You are a bad man."

"I try not to gossip, which does not mean I don’t read every weekly magazine out there."

Luke: "You read them because it is so delicious seeing these people fall apart. It makes you feel better about your own life."

Riley: "That upsets me. How could they throw it all away?"

"You’re very bad."

"In Riley-land, we don’t want to be negative. People love to come to Riley-land because of that. It’s a lot of fun. We go on rides and eat cotton candy and eat cookie dough nobody gets fat. There’s no negativity about others or ourselves."

Luke: "On a scale of one to ten, with ten being a saint-like devotion to truth, and one being completely manipulative?"

Riley: "A nine if not above a nine."

Riley says she was married "for under a few years."

"Just once."

She doesn’t want to talk about her marriage.

Luke: "What type of man do you find yourself attracted to?"

Riley: "Men who are real…. Someone who is not negative. Someone who sees that the glass is half-full all the time. If you put it out there that it’s going to be good, it’s going to be good… Someone who can love the Adirondacks."

Luke: "Are there any things that turn you on in a man that you wish didn’t?"

Riley: "Holy crap. What kind of interview is this?"

Luke: "You may be attracted to prisoners?"

Riley: "No."

Luke: "No violent ex-cons?"

Riley: "No. You’re a dark man. There’s a lot of stuff going on behind those dark eyes."

"There’s nothing that would embarrass me. I’m goofy and silly and at times immature."

Luke: "How important is a man’s professional success for you to find him attractive?"

Riley: "Nine or ten. Not financially. Just do they feel successful and are they happy with what they’re doing? They have to be…always striving to be better and do more. I’m so focused and determined, someone who’s not, it just wouldn’t fit… Every hour of the day is planned out… If somebody didn’t have that kind of energy, they just wouldn’t get me."

Luke: "Do Jack and Madison have sex [in Riley’s novel]?"

Riley: "They do. And in the movie version, you’ll see."

Luke: "When did this book come to you?"

Riley: "It was a script first. I gave it to a few people who seemed to really like it but without me starring in it. I kept thinking, ‘I’m not selling out.’ I just wasn’t ready to give it up… This was my Rocky. It’s in development as a feature."

"I sat down one summer, I had the script to go by, and I just started writing."

It took three months to turn into a novel.

"The first award was a Booksense award. They pick 20 books. It was with Stephen King and Nicholas Sparks… It was ridiculous. It was incredible."

Luke: "I want you to play a gossip columnist."

Riley: "You’re an evil evil man."

"One of my favorite shows is ‘Dirt.’"

"You especially would love the show. It’s so dark and so disturbing."

"It’s your kind of show because she runs a magazine called ‘Dirt.’"

Luke: "Is your mother like Ann [in Riley’s novel]?"

Riley: "Only in the good ways. The one that will totally support whatever her daughter wants to do."

Luke: "Did you get spanked?"

Riley: "I got hit once by my mother. Across the face. I was 15. It was well deserved."

Luke: "What was it for?"

Riley: "I can’t say. That’s a whole ‘nother area. It was to shock me out of a bad place. We’ll leave it at that until interview number two."

Luke: "What are you best at?"

Riley: "I’m best at being positive."

Luke: "Why do you write so much about high school?"

Riley: "It’s what comes easiest for me. Those characters are the easiest to write. I love writing about the angsty teen more than anybody."

Luke: "How do you feel about the interpretation that Being Bailey is really the story of Riley in Hollywood?"

Riley: "That could be… It’s true. Every one of my scripts, there’s a piece of me in it."

Luke: "How big a component of your happiness is your work?"

Riley: "A couple of years ago, all of it, which made me not as happy as I am now."

"I’m a part of a great church. I have great friends. I have great family. I love what I do."

Luke: "How do you feel about growing older?"

Riley: "If I looked older, I’d feel differently. I feel like I’m an infant. Age doesn’t matter. You can be anything you want at any age. It’s all a state of mind… There are friends I have, I don’t know how old they are. I don’t care. It wouldn’t matter if they were 19 or 99."

Luke: "Do you think human nature is basically good or basically bad?"

Riley: "I believe that human nature is basically great."

Luke: "Why?"

Riley: "If I believed it was negative, it would be negative. If I believed that human nature was filled with negativity, that’s what I would get."

Luke: "How much does empirical reality figure in your belief?"

Riley: "I don’t know what that means."

Luke: "In the 20th Century, 400 million were murdered. How much does that matter in deciding if human nature is good or bad?"

Riley: "There are unfortunate events that happen in the world that we have no control over. But if we believe that all of us that everyone was filled with negativity, I can’t imagine what a horrible place it would be to be alive."

In the past year, Riley completely changed her view on human nature. "The other side [that believes human nature is basically bad] doesn’t do any good for anybody."

Luke: "What does your church teach you about human nature?"

Riley: "That people are basically good."

"Hollywood, the entertainment industry, is what you make of it. The people I work with are amazing. The people I get to work with, I would not want to work with anyone else… They are fantastic people."

Luke: "You really believe that what we put out into the world comes back to us? Would you say that is 100% true?"

Riley: "One hundred per cent true."

Luke: "Is Hollywood a meritocracy?"

Riley: "In some aspects. Some people find sucess…on levels that have nothing to do with merit. Your last name can give you notoriety. How much money you can have can bring you notoriety. A reality show can bring you notoriety."

Luke: "Why is it so important to you to star in ‘Before I Go’?"

Riley: "Why was it so important to Sylvester Stallone to star in Rocky? If you have a dream… It’s funny that anybody cares. I want to star in it. I wrote it. I wrote the book. I wrote the future soundtrack… I only wrote it with me in mind."

Luke: "How much of a challenge will it be for you to pull off Madison [a teenage girl]?"

Riley: "None. The only challenge I’ll have is the skating. It’s not about me playing a 17-year old. That’s what I just did last week. The roles I play are all around that age range."

"When someone was interested in this project a couple of years ago, I hired a private coach and skated for a couple of months. She said that if she had me when I was age five, I would’ve gone to the Olympics because I was the right body type and the right size. I was doing single jumps within four weeks."

Posted in Riley Weston | Comments Off on Riley Weston Interview

HOW (NOT) TO GET AN “EXCLUSIVE” INTERVIEW FROM THE “LEADER OF THE REVOLUTION”

From ERSNews:

We here at ERS thought about writing a story about this doozy of a letter we obtained sometime ago. Then we thought to ourselves, why waste the space, this letter as they say "speaks for itself".

In addition to praising Qaddafi’s "courage and undaunted spirit", we suggest you take special notice of last paragraph of the first page where the letter offers the friendly dictator the "option to approve the edited version" of her interview before it is aired or published.

Many people may have forgotten, that Colonel Qaddafi was once targeted by US warplanes in the mid-1980’s in what can best be described as an attempt to kill the leader of Libya and an act of war by the United States. Two US Air Force pilots died back then and dozens of

Libyan’s were killed. Then President Ronald Reagan ordered the military attack on Libya and dubbed Qaddafi a terrorist for his countries repeated involvement in terrorist acts aimed at the United States around the world.

Here at ERSNews all we can say is "boy times sure have changed"! If you might be wondering about the "authenticity" of this letter we assure you it is 100% real. It was penned by a "Chief Senior Correspondent", Yeeli Hua Zheng, a former Chinese government official working then in the Washington DC bureau of "Phoenix Satellite TV." Rupert Murdoch and the Chinese government (PRC) own the satellite television network that beams "news" into China. The offices of the "news network" where Ms Zheng worked were conveniently located inside the Fox News Channel offices in Washington DC.

Ms. Zheng attended Harvard University where it seems they failed to teach her journalism 101. She has gone on to work at the New York Stock Exchange. You can read more about this Chinese "journalist" and her career at her own website.

We found all of this rather ironic. We think you will too.

Posted in Eric Longabardi | Comments Off on HOW (NOT) TO GET AN “EXCLUSIVE” INTERVIEW FROM THE “LEADER OF THE REVOLUTION”

Julia Allison Is Perfect

I’d never heard of this columnist until Vanessa G.’s article in New York magazine on Gawker this week.

I spent a few minutes Googling Julia this morning and she’s perfect. Absolutely scrumptious. Delicious.

As BigApple put it in Gawker comments: "I just have to say that I am really put off by the anti-woman rhetoric every time Julia Allison’s name appears. I don’t know anything about Julia but it is disturbing that just because a woman is young, attractive and successful she is automatically a slut and we should discuss her breasts. All in all I think your mother would be very disappointed by this hateful language."

ThighHigh posts: "I was a Julia hater until the post about her slumming in Silicon Valley. When I saw that pic of her in the low cut dress, I realized that her tits are deserving of fame and admiration. They really are. They are perfect and powerful and I for one would like to get to know them. Or perhaps sublet them."

Pope John Peeps II posts: "As a super-keen yet intelligent hetero, that was actually the moment I started to like J.A.’s breasts much less. Before then, I was lounging in the cloudy Seinfeld-esque dreamworld of "real and spectacular". But when they cantilevered themselves without cantilevers, I got unhappily suspicious of the internal structure. Then my organic dreams were shattered, and I alternated singing "Eleanor Rigby" and "Back to Black" for the next two hours."

Posted in Julia Allison | Comments Off on Julia Allison Is Perfect

Get Rich Off Liberal Bias

Mickey Kaus writes:

At a lecture today at the Milken Institute, economist/blogger Tyler Cowen said he didn’t think the sub-prime mortgage crisis was such a big deal. That’s always been my untutored sense–it seemed clear the MSM was hyping the crisis because a) it was the story of the moment; b) economic news is always bad news; and c) the anti-Bush, anti-GOP press is now in permanent campaign mode–and the economy is one of the few things the Republicans, and Bush’s policies, might be able to take some credit for. If it tanks, they’re really dead. So the press has a catastrophist bias when it comes to the economy. Remember when Enron was going to sink it in 2002? However big the subprime problem is, it was never going to be as big as the press makes out.

Which led me to this potential moneymaking idea: The moderate lib bias of the MSM is a huge irrational, distorting force on the information flow to the American elite, prompting them to not infrequently make colossal misjudgments (like thinking John Kerry would be a solid presidential pick for the Dems). To the extent this organic MSM bias actually distorts the market, it should create opportunites for stock-picking.

Posted in Mickey Kaus | Comments Off on Get Rich Off Liberal Bias

Bowling With Others

James Q. Wilson writes for Commentary:

In his celebrated book, Bowling Alone (2000), the political scientist Robert D. Putnam argued that America, and perhaps the Western world as a whole, has become increasingly disconnected from family, friends, and neighbors.

…In the short run, he is frank to acknowledge, his data show not positive effects but rather the opposite. “The more ethnically diverse the people we live around,” he writes, “the less we trust them.”

Diversity, Putnam concludes on the basis of his findings, makes us “hunker down.” Not only do we trust our neighbors less, we have less confidence in local government, a lowered sense of our own political efficacy, fewer close friends, and a smaller likelihood of contributing to charities, cooperating with others, working on a community project, registering to vote—or being happy.

…“Shocking” is the word that one political scientist, Scott Page of the University of Michigan, invoked to describe the extent of the negative social effects revealed by Putnam’s data. Whether Putnam was shocked by the results I cannot say. But they should not have been surprising; others have reported the same thing. The scholars Anil Rupasingha, Stephan J. Goetz, and David Freshwater, for example, found that social capital across American counties, as measured by the number of voluntary associations for every 10,000 people, goes up with the degree of ethnic homogeneity. Conversely, as others have discovered, when ethnic groups are mixed there is weaker social trust, less car pooling, and less group cohesion. And this has held true for some time: people in Putnam’s survey who were born in the 1920’s display the same attitudes as those born in the 1970’s.

Posted in Commentary Mag | Comments Off on Bowling With Others

John Podhoretz Named New Editor Of Commentary Magazine

Current editor Neal Kozodoy writes:

We are delighted to announce that John Podhoretz has been named to succeed Neal Kozodoy in the position of COMMENTARY’s Editor as of January 1, 2009.

Mr. Podhoretz will join the COMMENTARY staff this November. In the interim role of Editorial Director, he will assume particular responsibility for the development and expansion of our online editorial activities. Our blog, inaugurated less than a year ago, has become an important daily source of thought and opinion for readers around the world, and online operations will play an increasingly significant role in COMMENTARY’s growth.

Mr. Podhoretz, who upon his accession in January 2009 will become the fourth Editor in COMMENTARY’s six-decade history, brings long and varied experience as an editor, columnist, writer, and blogger. He has held executive positions at several publications, including the Weekly Standard, which he co-founded, Insight, and the New York Post. The author of three books about presidential politics, he is the lead political columnist of the New York Post, has served as the regular film critic of the Weekly Standard since its inception, and is a daily contributor to “The Corner,” National Review’s group blog. He was a regular on CNN’s “Reliable Sources” and is now a frequent on-screen contributor to the Fox News Channel. In government, he was a speechwriter to Ronald Reagan in 1988.

Mr. Podhoretz, forty-six, lives in New York with his wife and two daughters. He is the son of Norman and Midge Podhoretz.

Following the January 2009 transition in COMMENTARY’s editorship, Neal Kozodoy, who has been with the magazine since 1966 and has served as its Editor since 1995, and as President of Commentary, Inc. since the beginning of this year, will continue his active association in a consulting role.

Posted in Commentary Mag | Comments Off on John Podhoretz Named New Editor Of Commentary Magazine

‘I Want To Spend The Night With You In A Sleazy Motel’

My life is a series of failures.

Saturday night I drive 45 minutes to a bar in Silver Lake to celebrate Matt Welch’s new book only to realize that the party is Oct. 20.

Sunday I afternoon I wander the mean streets of Beverly Hills looking for a sports bar to watch the Cowboys-Patriots game.

Total failure until I end up in West Hollywood.

Monday night. My friend has a birthday party. We’re to meet at Trilussa in Beverly Hills.

I park on Doheny Blvd because it’s free and with my tzitzit flying in the breeze, walk block after block of tree-lined streets (Oakhurst, Palm, Elm, Maple, etc) lost and I don’t understand why. I made this walk every Friday for two years to therapy.

Finally I arrive on Rexford and realize this is where I normally park.

I get to the restaurant and it doesn’t seem kosher. I’m ready to ditch my yarmulke but I have a problem — my jeans are so tight I’ll never be able to stuff my tzitzit into them.

It’s 8:38 and nobody’s here. This party was called for 8:30. I make a panicked phone call. The crowd is on its way.

I stand awkwardly on the sidewalk and read Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle and people passing in and out of the restaurant call me a "nice Jewish boy."

Maybe my twink days aren’t over?

At 9 p.m., the crowd arrives to celebrate my friend’s birthday.

I have this welling fear that tonight is going to cost me money.

We’re supposed to be just meeting for drinks but the crowd takes a table.

I detach myself and go to the bar and after a few minutes finally get some service and I order a 7-Up. I pay with a $10 bill and the bar man just leaves it on the counter.

Now the birthday girl is signalling me to join her at the table and my money is still lying there. Why? What’s wrong with it? Why hasn’t the bar man cashed it and given me change?

I take it back and leave three $1 bills.

The music is too loud to talk. I’m in a panic that I’m going to be expected to order some food. I can’t eat here. It’s not kosher. Normally I’d be happy to eat vegetarian here but there’s an Orthodox rabbi in my group and I’m stuck with a yarmulke on my head and fringes sprouting from my waist.

I can’t tell if the MC is a man or a woman. The person has the face and voice of a man but the bust of a woman.

He calls out Justin the singing bartender who does a smooth job through three songs but my fear of a further lightening of my wallet freezes me. Yet I feel guilty that I should order something expensive if I’m sitting at a table.

I thought we were just going to be standing around the bar where my cheapness would not be so bad?

Then this fresh-faced 17 year old beauty named Caitlin (sp?) Jones (I Googled this girl and I can’t find anything on her, I must be spelling her name wrong, does anyone have her phone number? She seems to be in dire need of the type of Talmudic guidance that only I can provide) takes the mic. She wears a slinky evening dress and a sweet smile.

I relax and stare.

Thank heaven for little girls.

Near the end of her second song, I remember my tape recorder and turn it on. Audio

She’s followed by a bloke from Nashville named Boomer.

After a couple of songs, he’s joined by Jeanette Turner. She does two numbers written by boomer, climaxed by "I Want To Spend The Night With You In A Sleazy Motel."

Audio

How are we going to keep ’em down on the farm in Pico-Robertson once they’ve seen Beverly Hills?

A belly dancer comes out. She shakes her soft tummy and lies contorted on the floor.

"Get on your knees," says the MC. "That’s how I got my start."

Sheesh, if Rabbi Weil saw me now, he’d never let me back in to Beth Jacob.

I flee.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on ‘I Want To Spend The Night With You In A Sleazy Motel’

Parents Allege Their Children Were Experimented On Without Permission At A Long Beach Hospital – One Died

Miller Children’s Hospital in Long Beach is part of the MemorialCare hospital group. It has been named one of the top children’s hospitals in the country by Leapfrog, a hospital rating organization.

State health investigators are looking into whether the hospital permitted unauthorized research studies to be performed on children with respiratory problems. The studies involve "bronching" of children (placing flexible tubes into the bronchi with attached camera through the mouth and trachea). A hospital board member, Dr. J. Carlos Maggi, is one of the lead physicians conducting the study. Families of patients have complained that they were misled when told that the children needed the procedure.

I’ve contacted (through email and letter) Dr. Maggi and Miller’s Childrens Hospital of Long Beach for comment. Neither has yet responded.

Other news media outlets have known about this story for months.

Mary (not her real name) has a teenage daughter (Jane, not her real name).

A few years ago, Jane was rushed to the hospital for asthma.

Jane is on Medi-Cal.

Dr. J. Carlos Maggi was her doctor in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit at Miller’s.

Dr. Maggi told Mary that Jane had a lot of fluid on the lungs and other stuff in the lungs.He said that she needed a Flexible Bronchoscopy to save her life. She has since learned that this was a lie. The procedure was not necessary and only made her daughter sicker.

Dr. Maggi told her to leave the room. Mary was very upset because her daughter was in critical condition and he was making her sicker, putting her more at risk by doing this unnecessary procedure.

Dr. Maggi never told her he was doing a big research study on Flexible Bronchoscopy or that her daughter was part of a study.

He never asked her to sign a consent to be part of his research. He did not mention that he was doing anything unusual, even though she has since learned that this procedure was experimental.

Mary is upset that this doctor took advantage of her daughter for his own purposes. She has filed a complaint against Dr. Maggi with the Medical Board.

Numerous other children were experimented on without their permission, including at least one who died. One was brain dead. Dr. Maggi still did the procedure.

Most if not all of the people experimented on live in the ghetto.

The reason to use this procedure on kids is if you are suspicious there’s a foreign body in their lungs. It’s used late in the medical game because it is so invasive. It’s not supposed to be used on asthmatics and those with pending respiratory failure.

Dr. Maggi gets paid about $1,000 for each Flexible Bronchoscopy (by Medi-Cal, he gets more from private insurance).

I interview "Mary" Oct. 16 by telephone.

Mary: "My baby was at the hospital. She had asthma bad. Took her to Long Beach Memorial. They put her in the ICU. Then this doctor came by. He said he had to do a surgery on her and go in her lungs with some kind of tube…

"The part I’m mad about is that my baby is a minor and he made me leave the room while he did the procedure. I feel like I should’ve been in there while he was doing this to my young baby.

"They kept her in the ICU for five days. She was in the hospital for two weeks.

"From what I understand, he didn’t have to do that surgery, but he was saying it was a matter of life and death."

Luke: "Did he ever tell you he was doing this big research study and she was part of his study?"

Mary: "No."

Luke: "You feel the doctor took advantage of your daugher and experimented on her?"

Mary: "Yeah."

Luke: "Did you have to sign a consent form to be a part of his research?"

Mary: "No."

Luke: "Did she sustain any permanent injuries from this?"

Mary: "No. Well, my baby complains about chest pains a lot. Around her lungs. Yeah, I wonder if that is from that procedure he did."

Luke: "How did you find out he was experimenting on your daughter?"

Mary: "He had done it to some more kids at the hospital. They got together and contacted me."

Luke: "I may call you back as I learn more about this story."

Mary: "Feel free. We don’t want it to happen to nobody else and get injured if this is not necessary."

Posted in Health | Comments Off on Parents Allege Their Children Were Experimented On Without Permission At A Long Beach Hospital – One Died

Chief Rabbi On Torah And Science

Rabbi Gil Student blogs:

Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks spoke at yesterday’s conference on medical ethics and the indefatiguable Chana was there taking her copious notes (link). He opened by discussing this blog’s endlessly recurring topic, the Torah-science controversy (these are [lightly edited by me] notes and not his word-for-word remarks):

Before I begin the specific topic you’ve asked me to address… It does seem to me given the particular atmosphere of intellectual world in New York and London for that matter, I might just say some general remarks as hakdamah and preface in general to the relationship between science and religion. This was, or so we thought, the oldest of the old and I believed that anything that could be said on the subject HAD been said on the subject. However, we are currently living through a new chapter in this rather old story.

We recall the very first chapter: confrontation that began in the very beginning, the great confrontation between the Vatican and Galileo. The second chapter took place in Victorian England: the famous debate between Bishop and Thomas Huxley on Darwinism regarding the apparent contradiction between natural selection and the argument from design. We are currently living through the third chapter of this confrontation. I do follow the bestseller lists on Barnes and Noble- I always like to know what Americans are reading because whatever you read we’re going to read a year from now (laughter) and I’ve noticed a whole list on ____, atheism, Sam Harris’ “The End of Faith” and his “Letter to a Christian Nation”, “Breaking the Spell”- Richard Dawkin’s wonderfully apoplectic book “The God Delusion” – I do recommend it if you wish to experience indigestion (laughter) – in France “The Atheist Manifesto”- and from the other side is the argument from what tends to be called nowadays Intelligent Design – specifically associated with Michael Behe: the argument that random genetic mutation cannot give rise to irreducibly complex systems.

From a Jewish view this argument simply should never have happened in the first place, for the simplest of reasons: we believe that the God of Revleation is also the the God of Creation, and therefore there cannot be in principle a contradiction between them. And when you apply Revelation to Creation the result is Redemption – Tikkun Olam. And therefore in Judaism, science and religion – and that very much includes medical science – are two distinctive domains between the world. Everything reflects that duality. The two names for Hakadosh Baruch Hu refer to God that way – the name Elokim as we encounter him in Creation and the name Hashem as we encounter him in Revelation. There are two corresponding epistemologies, two ways of coming to come to know things: 1. knowledge of creation, chochmah, 2. knowledge of revelation – Torah. Chochmah is the truth we discover. Torah is the truth we inherit.

In a post two and a half years ago, I wrote the following (link):

When science appears to contradict the Torah, there are a few ways to deal with the situation. When I was a child, I was taught to compartmentalize the two – science and Torah are different realms and there is no need to reconcile them. This, it seems to me, can be a symptom of or result in either dismissing Torah as untrue, and I think that is how it was taught to me. But it can also be a result of remaining in a state of unconcerned faith. This is my personal approach.

I believe that what the Chief Rabbi is advocating is the latter approach, that of unconcerned faith. Torah and science are two different ways of arriving at the truth. There are no contradictions between the two and if there appears to be one, it will eventually be resolved.

Posted in Judaism | Comments Off on Chief Rabbi On Torah And Science

Reflections On Rosh Hashanah From A Black Guy

From the Macho Response:

I just spent some time working for a jewish synagogue, during their "High Holy Days" celebrations, and here are some random thoughts:

It was intoxicating to be around so many beautiful women, and not one of them was sporting a tattoo. Very few even had multiple earrings. There were no exposed mid-riffs; no tight-fitting clothing; no provocation of any kind, sexual, or otherwise. They were just "women" – and that made them very attractive.

One woman asked me if I ate kosher and I said no, I didn’t think so. She said I did – an apple was kosher and, surely, I’d eaten an apple? She said for now on I should say I usually ate non-kosher food. It made a weird kind of sense, I guess.

My supervisor told me they were an "activist" synagogue – trying to stop war in the Middle East, big on recycling and environmental issues, a lot of community projects. As we drove from the temple to the place where services were to proceed, she apologized for wanting to run the air conditioner. And, later, she admitted cheating and eating some pork products she had hidden. She apologized for that too. Really nice lady.

The first guy I met was the temple’s handy man, who was German. He was constantly explaining the jewish religious practices to me, though he wasn’t jewish. He said he was going to be a Catholic priest once, but "I turned my back on Christianity and started reading all the major religions." He explained that, if two men came to him with a problem, he wouldn’t want to understand one and not the other. Later, as services were going on, I picked up a copy of Harry Potter that some kid had left where we were working. The handy man saw me looking at it and said, "That’s the most important book ever written."

Believing in God makes people eccentric. Believers have to wear certain hats, or don certain shawls; do this now-do that later; eat this food, don’t eat that, look at the world this way. For this atheist, it reminded me of life in France – very inconvenient.

I kept practicing saying, "L’shanah Tova!" ("Happy New Year!") before the services started (thinking I wasn’t going to get it right, and end up sounding all phony, and shit) but – once I heard someone else say it – it came out real natural, and I even started feeling like it was my new year, too. That surprised me.

I worked as a parking attendant, mostly. There was limited parking where the services were taking place, most for disabled people, so I spent a lot of time telling people where the ample, free, parking was a few blocks away ("provided by good jewish boys"). But most people wanted to park where the services were, so they tried everything – making self-interested calculations to get around me, bribery, and even some good-natured flirting from the women. But there was one guy, over the course of two days, who just assumed I wasn’t worthy of respect in my role, and each time I encountered him, he just got worse and worse, eventually being really rude and threatening my job. I told him I was aware I was just a parking attendant, so I didn’t really have a place to tell him how to behave, but he wasn’t being a very nice person for someone going to services. He spat back that that’s why he was going.

Two kids were dropped off by their folks and one of them hadn’t finished dressing. He had his belt in his hand, so his pants were sagging, with his boxers hanging out. Before he headed inside, I said, "Hey, Boss, you gonna go into services looking like 50 Cent?" He stopped and thought about it, looked at his friend, and then made himself presentable. His friend laughed at him a little but both of them gave me a look like I was the coolest black guy on earth. Or Morgan Freeman.

I got permission to watch the end of the services from a corner, and, when some people noticed me, they started acting out – singing a little louder, and whipping themselves into a prideful frenzy. The kids especially. I couldn’t tell what was being said but, at one point, they all reached out to touch one another, kinda forming a human chain, and it really moved me. I had to fight back tears. It was like this big human family, all centered around this incomprehensible belief system that I didn’t share – and it reminded me of what atheists don’t have – and I missed it. Afterwards, they all hugged each other as they started to file out; and as I stood there, fighting back tears, I noticed that no one would meet my eyes or move to hug me: I wasn’t jewish. And that rejection reminded me of the simple strength of atheism – we proudly stand alone – in a world of spiritual believers who can be as cold and cruel as the void.

Posted in Judaism | Comments Off on Reflections On Rosh Hashanah From A Black Guy