The Most Unromantic Man In The World

I made some videos for lukeford.tv on Air Supply and what Air Supply means to me and Britney Spears and Angelina Jolie and ABBA.

Konen the Barbarian emails: "thanks for combing your hair and shaving!!!! Looking like VIGGO at the oscars the other nite ever see the movie ‘the most unromantic man in the world???”’??? the lead in that…and Luke…all you need is a MULLET LOL Having a laugh When you say BRITNEY you sharpen up your face Nice drinking of the yellow stuff….. YELLOW…?? wait….it isn’t… oh no…………! LUKE!! LOL AirSupply…looking at screen 1st 20 secs did you sell off your books and Prager tapes…the bookshelf looks barron Best! Digging the Grizzly Fordo looko, Leading Man Luke Ford"

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on The Most Unromantic Man In The World

Shoot Me Already

 Luzdedos1:  When r u going to photograph me in all of my hairy glory?
 HollyRandall:  lol
 HollyRandall:  soon
 HollyRandall:  i have to get this new attachment for my lens
 HollyRandall:  called a "Lens Baby"
 Luzdedos1:  stop toying with my heart and shoot me already
 HollyRandall:  lol
 Luzdedos1:  what’s new and exciting? I’m feeling great today. I earned serious coin shooting some promo videos and I’ve made $25 off adsense already today. Adsense is my most steady income, making about $20 a day off it.
 HollyRandall:  only if you take your pants off
 HollyRandall:  that’s great
 HollyRandall:  hang on i have to go light for a masturbation scene
 HollyRandall:  i’ll be back in about 20 min

Posted in Holly Randall | Comments Off on Shoot Me Already

Westwood Kehilla Struggling To Financially Support Two Rabbis

The Westwood Kehilla is doing all sorts of fundraising to try to get it done.

From Kehilla.org: "Under the leadership of Rabbi Asher Brander the Kehilla continues to expand upon its tradition of classes and numerous community activities throughout Los Angeles. We are home to two very vibrant minyanim; the Ashkenazi minyan led by Rabbi Brander, and the Sephardic minyan under the auspices of Rabbi Mordechai Lebhar, who in addition serves as the Rosh Kollel of the LINK Kollel."

Rabbi Brander is one of YULA’s best rabbis. He develops a loyal following among his students. Rabbi Brander makes the important point that unless you establish a close relationship with a rabbi, you’re unlikely to grow in your Judaism.

A shul needs to have an annual budget of $250,000 these days to afford a full-time rabbi. People expect more from their rabbis these days. They want marital counseling and personal counseling and the like. Rabbis are fielding calls at 10 p.m. about whether meat is kosher if it fell in milk dishes.

A shul needs 150 member families to afford a full-time rabbi. Rabbis expect to make over $100,000 a year (with benefits). Most rabbis have a lot of kids and must send them to Jewish day schools.

Young Israel of Century City is lucky for many reasons with its rabbi Elazar Muskin, among them that he also runs the shul. YICC does not need an executive director. They get one in Rabbi Muskin.

Is the Westwood Kehilla Modern Orthodox? If so, it is the only Modern Orthodox shul in Los Angeles that is an outreach shul. Aside from it, all the outreach shuls are haredi.

The Westwood Kehilla is the first Orthodox shul I attended in Los Angeles. I’ve gone to countless Shabbat dinners and study sessions there (though not often in the past ten years).

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Westwood Kehilla Struggling To Financially Support Two Rabbis

In The Name Of The Messiah, What Am I Doing?

Smiling Arab @ Palestine.com writes:

Lucas, what is all of this? You’re not only further polluting the web with these spam trap sites, but you’re not even good at it. My grandfather took time from fondling his many wives to tell me once that one works harder *not* to work than making an honest day’s living.

Go out, prostitute your meager skills in temp work with people half your age. Showing up at B-list events like some cut-rate paparazzi in a funeral director’s suit and creating blogs about things you don’t have the faintest clue about is working too hard not to work. You’ve walked away from your destiny as the moral shepherd to the porn whores. I don’t agree with that move but it’s your right. Now what you need to do is get a normal job that you can leave at 5pm and work on these retarded SEO sites in your spare time. There is absolutely no subject on which you have any authority whatsoever except porn. It would have been sad but understandable if you lost your soul in that world, but to see a man spiraling down the drain for BETTER REAL ESTATE TIPS LOL and affiliate payments from a "Free Guide to Composting" (which has just invaded my lower right-hand window) is just pathetic.

It’s man-up time, my friend. Your jew friends will never respect you and will always treat you like a creepy uncle because you’re a creepy person that lives like an overgrown teenager. They just can’t understand how a grown man can spend so much time in pursuit of so little. You’re undoubtedly well on your way toward becoming the answer to some porn fan’s WEHT question yourself. Stop before you lose even what little you have.

In the name of the Messiah I never believed in and you infamously abjured, just what the hell are you doing? You can’t even figure out how to fix your wordpress logins and you’re selling SEO services? You’re actually DESIGNING sites? Jesus Christ, Lucas, you’re making videos in your pathetic SEO dream giving writer tips? WRITER TIPS? Did you somehow fail to mention "WRITE ABOUT NAKED CHICKS" to account for your raging success in there?

I’ve warned you Luke, this isn’t going to end well for you. I don’t know why I should care whether you trade in the hovel for a refrigerator box — it’s not like we’re friends or anything — but for some reason, it rents my soul to see you reduced to this. Most people change careers several times in their life, but you’re on the wrong side of 40 for that. And I don’t think that pouring a thousand spammy words on a thousand spammy pages really counts as a "career", at least not to your Jew friends.

Follow my advice: call Rob Spallone, beg him for a short bridge loan and get a pr0n site up and running again. Your wonderful "SEO skills" that you’re currently learning from books-on-tape and sites that look as godawful hideous as this one aren’t going to keep you out of the poorhouse, mostly because (and this is a GIGANTIC CLUESTICK for you here), you’re NO LONGER WRITING ABOUT ANYTHING INTERESTING. Really. Holly’s kind enough to give make a cameo in this disastrous spin-off and you can’t even do anything with that. You’ll get some people here for the trainwreck and you’ll become the new Casey Serin, with thousands reveling as you take each step closer to your demise. Except he knew how to admin WordPress, like every other half-functional tard.

This is it, Luke. You’re at a turning point. It’s not too late. Amalek may have given up on you for spurning his advice but I have not.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on In The Name Of The Messiah, What Am I Doing?

Bad News

That was the most successful email header for Frank Kern in his recent campaign for Mass Control. That header got more emails opened than any other.

I’ve sometimes heard Orthodox Jews say, "If he doesn’t stop talking lashon hara about me, I’m going to take him to a Beit Din (Jewish law court)."

Do Beit Din punish people for speaking true but damaging things against others in the community? If so, how?

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Bad News

Mommy’s Little Secret

From the Globe and Mail:

As we gather to mark the festive season, here’s one juicy morsel mom won’t be dishing up: that guy you call your dad may not be. DNA testing has revolutionized medical science, CAROLYN ABRAHAM reports, but it also has uncovered the myth of female monogamy. Now doctors are wondering how to break the news to men

By CAROLYN ABRAHAM, Saturday, December 14, 2002 – Print Edition, Page F1

They came to the hospital together, a husband, a wife and the little daughter they feared had been cursed by inheritance. Since birth, she had struggled to breathe, and all the signs pointed to cystic fibrosis.

If the girl truly had the incurable disease that clogs the lungs, she had to have received two copies of a CF gene, one from each parent. Tests at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto confirmed the family’s worst fears — and then some.

The girl was indeed afflicted. Her mom carried one of the culprit genes. But her dad, the doctors discovered, was quite a different story. His DNA showed no sign of a CF gene, which means he is not a carrier and he is not her dad.

Hospital staff have felt bound to keep the secret from him. But when they told the mom, it came as no surprise; it rarely does.

"It is probably true in a lot of families, that daddy is not who you think it is," says Steve Scherer, a senior scientist in department of genetics at the Hospital for Sick Children.

As families gather this festive season, here is a spicy fact that mothers might be loath to dish out at the holiday table: It’s now widely accepted among those who work in genetics that roughly 10 per cent of us are not fathered by the man we believe to be dad.

Geneticists have stumbled upon this phenomenon in the course of conducting large population studies and hunting for genes that cause diseases such as cystic fibrosis. They find full siblings to be half-siblings, fathers who are genetic strangers to more than one of their children and uncles who are much closer to their nieces and nephews than anyone might guess. Lumped under the heading of "pedigree errors," these so-called mis-paternities, false paternities and non-paternities are all science jargon for the unwitting number of us who are chips off someone else’s block.

The proverbial postman seems to be ringing twice in everyone’s neighbourhood. Non-paternity is believed to cut across all socio-economic classes and many cultures. Factor it into genealogical attempts to trace ancestry and it can snap entire branches from a family tree. Considered in light of long-held views about sexual behaviour, it exposes the myth of female monogamy and utterly shakes the assumption that women are biologically driven to single-mate bliss.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on Mommy’s Little Secret

Knock Yourself Up, a new book from the US, has provoked outcry by encouraging women to become single mothers, without men, through artificial insemination

Stefanie Marsh writes:

Here comes a book, from a progressive corner of the United States (Brooklyn, New York), that tells us that a single lesbian has had a baby with an anonymous sperm donor. About which many British people would privately think, so what? It happens here all the time, even if many don’t like it. Only last month we read about Andy Bathie, a 37-year-old fire-fighter, who donated sperm to a lesbian couple five years ago and is now being made to pay child support because the couple separated.

But Louise Sloan’s book has irritated people, even here. Her own story – single lesbian conceives child via anonymous sperm donor – is sufficiently unconventional to make the social conservatives wrinkle their noses. And even some liberals are unsettled by the contents of Sloan’s book. A jaunty part-memoir, Knock Yourself Up – “a tell-all guide to becoming a single mom” – is provocatively subtitled, No Man? No Problem!Alongside her own experiences, she has interlaced the stories of more than 50 single mothers – most straight, all “the new breed of single moms”.

The tone is flip and matter of fact and occasionally gynaecological. We find out that some women masturbate while inseminating themselves with turkey basters because they are more likely to conceive. Others light candles and play soft music. Nicole loves it “when my inseminations are on a Saturday. I read the paper, and then go out for breakfast. Last time I scheduled a pedicure for afterwards. Married couples have fun making a baby – why shouldn’t I?”

Carol found prince charming in a sperm bank: “He’s stellar in the sciences, whereas I’m a more liberal arts person. We’ve got a complete overlap of hobbies. He’s tall and slim – with dimples! And even, straight teeth without braces! He’s a great addition to the family tree.” When Jenny first saw a picture of her sperm donor on the web she thought: “Oh my God, I would totally have sex with that guy.”

Eva tells Sloan: “There’s a reason I’m single – relationships involve a lot of compromise and I want to keep my voice,” but never suspects that she comes across as an unbearable control freak. Kimberley complains that: “I am a magnet for alcoholic crazy lunatics,” but doesn’t ask herself why. Sloan writes that women are beginning to see their lives in a different order: children, then, if you’re lucky, a partner. But “for most single mothers by choice whose libidos remain intact,” writes Sloan, “looking for love or sex becomes logistically or emotionally complicated. The solution? A vibrator.”

Sloan is a graduate of Brown University (comparative literature), then glossy magazines such as Glamour and Golf for Women, no Andrea Dworkin is she. Her career high before the publication of Knock Yourself Up was the award for a piece she wrote for a woman’s magazine on coming out as a lesbian at work. It’s what I’d call “celebratory” journalism, factual and yet gloopily soulful and upbeat, atmospherically much like an organic food shop – at least half the women she interviews are either “energetic and attractive”, or “strikingly attractive”, their children are frequently “adorable”.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on Knock Yourself Up, a new book from the US, has provoked outcry by encouraging women to become single mothers, without men, through artificial insemination

Not tonight, dear . . . in fact, not ever

Dr. Pam Spurr writes:

Emily, 37, is a successful solicitor with a husband and a two-year-old son. To her friends, she doubtless lives a charmed existence. But recently she sat across from me in a life coaching session. She was very distressed. Having just discovered that her husband of five years had had an affair, she felt that her world had disintegrated. She’d been a good partner, hadn’t she? She was caring and hardworking, wasn’t she?

Closer examination of their relationship revealed that Emily hadn’t had sex with her husband for many months. When I pushed Emily gently on this she was incredibly defensive. It was her view that she was too busy with her career and raising their son to give any thought or time to sex.

Over the past two decades I have worked as a psychologist, life coach and sex expert, and I have found that Emily’s attitude is all too common. And such views don’t bode well for the success of relationships. With increasing frequency, women in their twenties, thirties and forties take a pragmatic, postfeminist view that sex is something over which they have no need to negotiate. In the bedroom, there is no compromise. If a man has a higher sex drive than a woman, then he can sort himself out. If he wants to try something new and she can’t be bothered, tough luck to him.

Eventually, Emily and her husband repaired their relationship – which meant learning how to confront their differences, including sexual ones.

Posted in Marriage, Sex | Comments Off on Not tonight, dear . . . in fact, not ever

What

Khunrum emails: "Great article below. In Asia it’s not just the bar girls who are putting out but practically all the girls. My young buddy Phil was boffing a beautiful Thai Muslin coed but first had to buy her a gold necklace that was as thick as a rope. A Frenchman I know was doing great at his restaurant but was diddling around with a Thai University sweetie. He set the gal up in a condo. Word was she was boinking the Frog and the local Thai Police Commander. His wife (the cook) caught wind of his infidelity and left him. He hired a new one but the food wasn’t the same. He didn’t pay attention anymore and was spending too much time away from the business which went down the drain. Now he’s on the street, sleeping on friend’s couch’s. Oh! what that furry creature will do to a man. arrrrrggggghhhhh!"

Rachel Johnson writes for the Times of London:

So, Sophie Anderton is a prostitute. Two weeks ago, the underwear model offered an undercover News of the World reporter the freedom of her body in return for £10,000. Clad only in a G-string and Christian Louboutin stilettos, she expertly negotiated the sum while hoovering up lines of coke in a London hotel. Okay, so Anderton is on the game. This is shocking news. But hold on. Didn’t we always suspect that there was a ?ne line between model and escort, escort and prostitute? The steps between each stage are alarmingly small. After all, the fashion industry is full of impoverished models who are expected to strip off and work the circuit during the day, so why not do it at night, too?

Model agencies are regularly approached to send batches of girls to parties; the girls are happy to oblige because they might get noticed. One fashion insider reports that “loads” of models are happy to provide a beautiful presence for rich men in return for hard cash. “One Saudi prince pays girls to come to his huge parties. They are booked, paid well, then come back with even more cash, and they are weighed down with jewellery like you wouldn’t believe. He always has the most beautiful girl on his arm. The girls don’t take payment for sex. They just know they’ll be sorted with diamonds.”

What Anderton did wrong was to be upfront about it. Actually, asking for money shunted her that little bit further, locating her in a marginally different category from women who sleep with men with fast cars who have just taken them to Nobu, or who attach themselves to a rich man they ?nd emetically unattractive, or social climbers who marry a house. But then, when it comes to sex, money and power, male-female relations are as grey as the winter skies.

It’s not a new story: three centuries ago, Lady Mary Wortley Montagu wondered whether marriage was not, after all, a form of legalised prostitution. In many sexual relationships today, physical intimacy is often tacitly offered on the presumption that the recipient will provide a quid pro quo of some sort.

Anderton’s motive was typical of a woman desperate to upgrade her life: she was selling her body to help pay for a three-bedroom house in Notting Hill. Chelsea is full of slightly unplaceable twentysomethings who exist in the same twilight zone – models/actresses/stylists/whatevers with no discernible sources of income, who have jaw-dropping wardrobes full of £5,000 designer shoes and coats, and who can’t even afford the buckle on a Birkin bag unless they put out. They’re not naming a price, but they’re happily going on the shopping trip.

The transaction may appear below the line, but generally, a deal is being done, and it is one in which both parties know the rate of exchange. Only Anderton’s blunt manner – her tendency to cut the crap and ask for the goods – sets her apart from women who party, put out and run off with the diamonds. Her tale of woe simply lays bare the fact that most of us, at some point and in some way, on whatever scale, are selling ourselves. Maybe not sex for £10,000, but there are plenty of women who have agonised over whether they should snog a guy simply because he paid for dinner. One especially solvent man of my acquaintance says of his girlfriend: “She wakes up the next morning and tells me her washing machine is broken. It’s no big deal to give her £500. The following week, I take her out for dinner, and she stays the night. It’s no big deal to spend some time and money shopping the next day.”

Indeed not. No big deal to him, and possibly quite fun for her. But where do you draw the line? When drugs and power are involved, you would be surprised how far seemingly normal girls are prepared to go. One woman recalls how, as a student, she used to visit a Greek shipping tycoon in Chester Square, Belgravia. She would strip to her undies and play with herself, and leave with £150. Now in her thirties, she looks back on it without pride.

“I was abused as a child, and I think that low self-esteem and a desperate need for attention led me to do it, because abuse makes you think that your only utility is as a sexual object,” she says. “I used to work in a casino and a guy offered me £10,000 if I’d go on a dirty weekend with him. I thought, a weekend will be over quickly, but the fact that I’d prostituted myself will mentally last a lifetime.”

Has she been tempted to offer sex for money since? “I need an operation that I can’t get on the NHS, and I’m in the early stages of a relationship with a Muslim guy. He’s offered to pay, and I know it’s because he wants to spend time with me,” she admits. “It’s hard to judge people who are desperate, but I think that these girls are essentially greedy. Like Anderton, who wants to pay for a house she can’t afford, they are just lost souls. They think that the trinket or the holiday or the car is worth more than their own self-respect, but it never is.”

Posted in Dating, Prostitution | Comments Off on What

The Big Event Live: Banned

Rabbi Gil Student writes:

Last week, there was a ban published in Hamodia that declared an upcoming charity concert by Shloime Gertner and Lipa Schmeltzer to be forbidden (link). Frankly, I have no patience for bans and don’t understand why rabbis keep chipping away at their own authority by signing them. They may have won the battle but they are badly losing the war.

I watched one of the videos posted on the concert’s website (link) and it seems to me to just be a lighthearted event of good, clean fun (with separate seating — I, II). Fun, that is, and not the kind of concert that is all about singing songs in praise of God. There could very well be an halakhic problem with such a concert, perhaps on multiple levels. I certainly do not approve of this kind of concert. But a ban… ? It just alienates the people who are attracted to this kind of event and are already feeling alienated. In other words, it exacerbates the "at risk" problem and serves to undermine rabbinic authority in a large segment of the Charedi community.

Maybe it would be more effective — on many levels — to teach why this concert is inappropriate rather than APPEARING to bully the singers and charity into losing a huge amount of money and spoiling everyone’s fun.

Joe emails me: "If you do add your name to the kol koreh you are co-signing with the infamous Lipa Margulies, enabler of Kolko. His presence on this ban has really created a great deal of sarcastic humor on the frum blogs."

Fannie posts:

just heard from a reliable source that there is another ban coming out by Rabbi Yisroel Belsky against going to the zoo on Chol Hamoed Pesach. He insists that the zoo it is full of shreiklicha pritzus, with mixed crowds of chassidishe men and women standing together with minor children watching pedophile monkeys and apes dancing and swinging together without any clothing, or, watching walruses and seals skinny-dipping without any mechitza. Rabbi Belsky admits that the last time he went to the zoo he found himself very aroused by all the pritzus and feels that future visits there must be stopped. He is now in the process of drafting a new Kol Koreh on the subject called LO ZOO AF ZOO.

Posted in New York, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on The Big Event Live: Banned