Is Elizabeth Edwards A Victim?

She says she knew he had this affair in 2006 and yet she encouraged him to run for the presidency anyway and she knew he was lying to reporters about not having an affair with Rielle Hunter.

I say she’s culpable for allowing John’s lies and for encouraging his reckless bid for political power that was destined to blow up.

Mickey Kaus writes:

How big a victim is Elizabeth Edwards? A decision tree: Did John Edwards

A) finally come clean in his Friday evening Nightline interview! … or

B) choose, when caught out in a lie, to recklessly erect a second edifice of BS regarding at least 1) whether this was his only affair; 2) when this affair started; 3) when it ended; 4) whether it was going on in mid-2007 when Rielle Hunter’s child was conceived; 5) whether he thinks he might be the father; 6) whether he actually wants a paternity test; 7) why he visited Hunter at the Beverly Hilton; 8) whether he knew and/or tacitly approved of payments to Hunter and putative father Andrew Young. …

If you opt for B–perhaps citing this, or this–you face a second, more interesting speculation: Why did Edwards tell his new lies? Were they

i) the same lies he told his wife, Elizabeth–that the affair ended in 2006, etc.–so the Nightline‘s Story #2 was really an attempt to save his marriage now that his political career is over or

ii) lies designed more to preserve the possibility of a political comeback some time in the future by admitting only to a "short" affair, before his wife’s cancer recurred, that did not involve any questionable campaign practices (such as using contributions to give your mistress a job that allows her to travel with you)?

It’s not surprising that People magazine’s new cover story portrays Elizabeth Edwards as the anguished victim motivated by "her determination to keep her family together." People is basicaly working from script (A), the one John Edwards undoubtedly wanted the MSM to work from when he prepared for Nightline. The Excruciating Anguish of Elizabeth (who "pushed her husband to finally come clean") would be a logical part of that PR strategy whether or not Edwards was telling the truth to Bob Woodruff.

Posted in Adultery, John Edwards | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Is Elizabeth Edwards A Victim?

The Anguish Of Elizabeth Edwards

From people.com:

"There was anguish – excruciating anguish – for her in dealing with this," Elizabeth’s best friend Hargrave McElroy tells PEOPLE in its new issue.

Behind the public show of strength, the Edwards’ household has been a scene of turmoil and tension since John, 55, first began revealing the truth about his affair with former campaign aide, Rielle Hunter, 44, after the formal launch of his campaign in the final days of 2006. "He told the truth slowly," according to one source close to the couple.

Elizabeth, 59, faced an agonizing choice: "Do I kick him out, or do we have a 30-year marriage that can be rebuilt?" says McElroy. The fact that she suffers from a terminal disease, one that could rob her children – Jack, 8, Emma Claire, 10 and Cate, 26, a student at Harvard Law School – of their mother, weighed heavily in her decision.

"She couldn’t say, ‘Well, maybe we’ll work through this for years, or maybe we should separate for two years,’" adds Elizabeth’s best friend. "[The cancer] forced her to choose whether to move forward."

Posted in Adultery, John Edwards, Journalism | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Anguish Of Elizabeth Edwards

Rabbi Shmuel Hertzfeld & Open Orthodoxy

Joe emails:

I think that you should run a piece on Rabbi Shmuel Hertzfeld. His time has come, since he is a quasi-celeb.

Without any previous knowledge, you might think Hertzfeld is some kind of activist, a modern day Heschel — but Orthodox.

That is not the case. Let me give you some background. You can verify the assessment that I am giving you with anyone who was at YU with Hertzfeld.

Hertzfeld was in YU before Yeshivat Chovevei Torah opened up. Today, a person like him would probably wind up at YCT, but that wasn’t an option then.

He was always a maverick, or, if you will a trouble maker. He would make controversial statements in public, just to attract attention.

His most famous line — which he would repeat and repeat and repeat was, "The only reason guys in YU get married early, is because they don’t have premarital sex." Of course, everyone knew that he and his girlfriend were dating a long time, by YU standards, and only got married after three years of dating.

So, Hertzfeld was some kind of cynical YU guy, doing graduate work at Revel (YU’s graduate program in Judaic studes) — until he met Avi Weiss. When Hertzfeld took the job at Weiss’s shul (Hebrew Institute), he got into the whole "Avi Weiss/Hug everyone/isn’t it a wonderful world/so open-minded your brain falls out" thing. Luke, since you live on the West coast,  you are used to such people; in New York, they are a rare commodity. Hertzfeld realized that, instead of making provocative comments that enraged people in YU, you could say the same things, and become the darling of your congregants, because that is exactly what they wanted to hear, a message contra YU.

Then Hertzfeld saw his opportunity. He took a dying shul in the DC area and renamed it "The National Synagogue." What a move! It’s like, there’s a National Cathedral — and a National Synagogue. He got a ton of money from Jonas (of IDT fame) and was soon in business running tons of programing. In a place like Washington, he taped into a niche market for "Open Orthodoxy."

Here’s Hertzfeld, doing his Open Orthodoxy thing, and getting the other rabbis, who belong to the "Vaad of Greater Washington," more and more upset at him. In a sense, he infuriated Rabbi Barry Freundel more than the more right-leaning rabbis. Freundel is a major YU person, very into YU as an institution. Hertzfeld represents a challenge to that.

Rubashkin was Hertzfeld’s coup de grace. He gained two things: first, he presented himself as a social activist, which is exactly the kind of PR that he needs. Second, he "assered," or forbade the meat, which is supervised by establishment groups like the OU. This is a classic trick of rabbis, to forbid something to show your political muscles. Even better, Hertzfeld comes out "frummer" than the other DC rabbis, who are far to his right.

The Times op-ed was a classic Hertzfeld. It brings him back to the days of being a cynical YU smicha guy.

The problem is, that he is nearly untouchable. If YU crucifies him, then he’ll become a martyr for Open Orthodoxy. If they tried to assassinate his character, by bringing out his dirty laundry from his YU days, then Hertzfeld will only gain, since he will become known as "the cool rabbi who allows pre-marital sex." Only time will tell what lies in wait for Shmuel Hertzfeld.

Posted in R. Shmuel Herzfeld | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Rabbi Shmuel Hertzfeld & Open Orthodoxy

Kevin Roderick Vs. Eric Longabardi

Kevin writes on LAObserved:

I was an assistant metropolitan editor at the Los Angeles Times when the Rodney King riots erupted in April, 1992 and the Northridge earthquake struck on Jan. 17, 1994. Huge stories, of course, and everyone in Metro was thrown into round-the-clock riot and quake duty. Excellent coverage resulted and the Pulitzer Prize for spot news was awarded "to the staff of the Los Angeles Times" in 1993 and 1995. The prizes went up on a wall somewhere at the Times and the cash was donated, as I recall. Those of us who worked on the stories got a little 5×7 acrylic rectangle with embedded front pages from the Pulitzer-winning days. Most of us tossed the plaques in boxes, made a note for our resumes and moved on.

In 1997 I became the paper’s Senior Projects Editor, working with investigative stories and series (and more Pulitzer winners.) In 1999 or so I got a call from a freelance TV producer named Eric Longabardi asking to collaborate with the Times on some investigative project. I don’t recall the details, but something about him didn’t feel right and I passed. The next time I heard of him, Longabardi was trying to peddle an investigation that TV outlets had rejected about the 9-11 hijackers in Arizona. In 2005 he got hold of me via email — "I am a faithful reader of LA-O — you do a superb job with the site" — to ask for advice on an investigative book.

Posted in Eric Longabardi, LAObserved.com | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Kevin Roderick Vs. Eric Longabardi

The 64-Year Old Boy Toy

Joe emails:

I’m talking to Rex yesterday and they guy’s depressed cuz he’s got no baht, no SS coming and just broke up with his 86 year old "girlfriend". I asked him why and he said she was tightfisted with the $$ (imagine being a 64 year old boy toy.) He told me "it wasn’t going anywhere"….huh? I said "buddy…the only place it’s going at 86 is Boot Hill…."

Posted in Dating | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The 64-Year Old Boy Toy

First-hand look at meat plant shows rabbi has been misled

Rabbi David Eliezrie, President of the Rabbinical Council of Orange County, writes:

Sadly, Rabbi Dennis Sasso has transgressed one of the most important and basic principles of Jewish Law, that you cannot judge an issue unless you have heard both sides and heard firsthand testimony ("A moral standard for eating kosher," Aug. 5).

I have just returned from a fact-finding mission of more than 25 rabbis to the Postville, Iowa, meatpacking plant. The reality we discovered was far different from the one that the rabbi claimed. We found a state-of-the-art plant; workers receiving fair wage and benefits such has health, dental and vacation pay; great attention to worker safety; and the use of the e-Verification system to ensure all workers are legal.

Apparently, the rabbi has relied on statements of the union that has a clear agenda and is trying to take over the plant.

The reality today in Pottsville is dramatically different from what he asserted. He has made accusations based on rumor instead of fact.

Did R. Eliezrie speak to any of the accusers of Agriprocessors or did his first-hand research consist only of the tour given him by the plant?

Posted in Agriprocessors | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on First-hand look at meat plant shows rabbi has been misled

Herzfeld v. Lewin, Round 2

Ben Harris writes for JTA:

Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld (he of NYTimes Op-Ed fame) and his congregant Nat Lewin (famed attorney and Agriprocessors defender) are having a little intra-shul spat over the ethics of kosher slaughter. Lewin called Herzfeld (his own rabbi!) a “vigilante” in his response to Herzfeld’s Times article and described his reasoning there as “fallacious.”

Now Herzfeld is back for another round, though with the stipulation that he won’t “engage in a back and forth.” Oh, well maybe just one more time.

Herzfeld’s response after the jump.

Response to Nat Lewin
by Shmuel Herzfeld

Nat Lewin is one of our finest congregants and has always been a terrific advocate for the Jewish people. Obviously, our entire community is struggling with this difficult issue which asks us to balance the requirement of due process while not turning our backs on heart wrenching allegations that strike at the core of our identity.

I will not engage in a back and forth argument in this forum, but it is important to address the argument about the legitimacy of the position cited in the name of Rabbi Yisrael Salanter.

Many sources on this topic are cited in an article by Rabbi Avi Gisser, Chief Rabbi of Ofra, Israel in his article for Ma’aglei Tzedek, an organization in Israel that seeks to unite laws of kashrut with concerns for how workers are treated. The article is available on line at www.edah.org/mtzenglish.pdf.

The story about Rav Salanter was one story from a genre of Rav Salanter stories that might have been cited. Here is a small portion of Rav Gisser’s article:

According to Rav Kook, what our generation needs, especially now, is to add fuel to the great flame of social justice that stems from a deep awe of G-d. Three anecdotes from the life of Rabbi Salanter demonstrate this. Once, Rabbi Salanter visited a new matzah bakery in order to check its work practices and level of kashrut. He reviewed all the manufacturing procedures extensively and observed the intense labor and toil of the employees. At the end of Rabbi Salanter’s visit, the bakery owner proudly asked him, “What does the rabbi say?” He answered, “The Gentiles accuse us, G-d forbid, of using the blood of Christian children in matzah. While this is not the case, from what I have seen here, there is indeed a violation of the prohibition on blood in food. The blood of the workers is mixed with the matzah! I will not certify this bakery as kosher.” In another case, Rabbi Salanter was asked what demands particular attention when baking matzah. He answered: “One must be scrupulous not to yell at the woman kneading the dough.” He was also quoted as saying, “It is prohibited to enhance your mitzvot at the expense of others.” One day Rabbi Salanter was hosted by a rich man. When he performed the ritual hand-washing before the meal, he used a sparing amount of water. He was asked, “Doesn’t the Torah say it is praiseworthy to wash with a lot of water?” He answered,

“I can only do that in my own home. Here, however, I must consider the needs of the servant who must carry the buckets of water.” When attending large dinners, Rabbi Salanter also hurried to finish eating quickly in consideration of the waiters and other workers, who had to wait until the end of the meal to go home. “Justice, justice you shall pursue in order that you may live in and inherit the land.”

Rav Gisser’s article is published with a powerful statement immediately following it. Here is a portion of that statement:

Out of concern for Israel’s moral and humane character as a Jewish State, respecting all its citizens, in which justice is one of its basic principles, we wish to announce a social seal, committing all who believe in justice and morality. We hereby request all business proprietors to respect the dignity of their workers and visitors, both regarding to conditions of employment, and also assuring accessibility to people with disabilites. We ask all for whom the Jewish humane character of Israel is important to be aware of just consumerism, and to buy only in places holding the social seal.

It is signed by many of our greatest rabbis including, Rabbi Ya’akov Ariel, Rabbi Shlomo Aviner, Rabbi Yo’el Bin-Nun, Rabbi Chaim Drukman Rabbi Mordechay Elon, Rabbi Benni Lau and Rabbi Aharon Lichtenstein.

Rabbi Heshie Billet posts:

Rabbi Herzfeld cites Rabbi Salater as saying that” it is prohibited to enhance your mitzvah at the expense of others”. It seems tha Rabbi Herzfeld does believe that it is permitted to enhance his reputation at the expense of others.Why else publish his self serving, poorly researched piece in the NY Times? As if he is the white Rabbinic knight who unlike his colleagues is outraged by immorality.The Rabbi also did not think about the harm he might do by confirming allegations about a Kosher slaughtering plant before a government investigation was completed. His NY Times piece has already had a ripple effect in 2 European communities in a precarious position regarding government approval of Kosher Shechitah.
Had he really been the selfless spokesman for ethical Judaism that he claims to be, he would have chosen an in house venue as opposed to the NY Times. He also would have researched his piece better. The Edah Jounal is not a primary source on Rav Yisrael salater. There is no proof that the writer in the Edah Journal made any effort to check the accuracy of the Rav Yisrael Salanter any more than Rabbi Herzfeld. We now know that he did not research the story’s veracity at all.
His piece is a self serving piece at the expense of the reputations and well being of others.

Dear Dovy
There is no one in the RCA or OU who approve of the allegations at Agriprocessors if they are proven true. No one was aware of the allegations until the story broke. We all believe that Social Justice goes hand in hand with Kosher supervision. Wee also believe in due process. The accused has rights as well. There is also the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. The process is not yet complete and the charges to date have not yet been proven.

My complaint with Rabbi Herzfeld is not with his right to criticize the OU or the RCA. My complaint is the platform he chose, his poor research, his self serving article in the Times ( the world should know that one Orthodox Rabbi cares and is different from the the others), and his failure to see that his article in the Times may impact negatively on Jewish communities in other parts of the world.

Had he written his piece exclusively in a Jewish publication, I would remain silent even if I thought him to be out of line.
Heshie Billet

Rabbi Yehuda Shwain posts:

Nat Lewin Esq.

We beg to differ with your conclusions re: the Kashus status of AGRI / RUBASHKIN. In the area of Law all Court appearances by lawyers subscribe to the common”if the law is in your favor, harp on the law..If the facts are in your favor, harp on the facts..If neither is in your favor, confuse the issues..

Re: Agri / Rubashkin kashrus status not the facts nor the Kashrus Halacha is in your faver…

The ones in the know have claimed for years that the kashrus at Agri / Rubashkins leaves much to be desired. Is is on a very low standard from a kashrus point of view. It’s alledged that labels are under the control of the plant & their workers, not under the tight exclusive control of the kosher certifiers.

It’s also alledged that Agri Rubashkin commonly switches labels as they need, even from non-kosher to kosher which includes relabeling labeling non-bet-Yosef as bet yosef.

Rabbi Weismandel is aware of the labeling issue that Rubashkin is in control of the labels. Trucks operated by non-Jews carry labels to affix to Agri Rubashkin products. I picked up one of those boxes.

The Non-Jew making the additional cut for bleeding and the ripping of the Trachea & yanking the lung with a hook would declare the animal as a TREIFA.

Using an electric prod on the head of the animal may make it a TREIFA.

Shooting the animal after Shchita & then using it as a kosher animal is unacceptable ” I have seen it myself”.

Don’t try to defend their Kashrus standards, They are operating a 70% non-kosher operation & they should never be permitted to operate a kosher operation due to all of their kashrus violations.

Kosher Consumers Union, Inc.
Rabbi Yehuda Shain, President

There are many other serious kashrus issues at the plant.

Posted in Agriprocessors, Orthodox Union, RCA | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Herzfeld v. Lewin, Round 2

Shereshevsky’s Rabbi Talks To Media

From WAVY TV 10:

According to the US Attorney’s Office and FBI, from at least 2005 on, the men would raise money from investors for private placement offerings, then use all or part of the money for other purposes, including to pay off previous investments, without telling investors.

According to federal documents obtained by WAVY.com, the men agreed to fabricate a story when the offerings fell through.

In one instance, Shereshevsky allegedly said, "In the next month and a half he’d be able to come up with two million bucks and that this was better than somebody going to jail."

WAVY.com spoke with one of Shereshevsky’s in-laws at his home Monday night.

She said, "That’s not the person I know. So unless…I don’t know what to say, I really don’t."

Shereshevsky is a member of B’Nai Israel in Norfolk. Monday night, Rabbi Chaim Silver met with his family.

"They’re very strong, they’re very confident in their father and husband’s innocence," said Rabbi Silver.

Rabbi Silver says he’s known Shereshevsky for three years.

"Shereshevsky is a very generous and caring human being. He has given of himself his resources to this community," said Rabbi Silver.

According to federal documents, Shereshevsky pleaded guilty to one count of Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud in 1994.

As for the charges Shereshevsky faces now,  "They are very big figures. Things that I simply can not relate to and they are things that have not been proven," said Rabbi Silver.

Posted in Sharashefsky | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Shereshevsky’s Rabbi Talks To Media

Orthodox Rabbi Slams OU, RCA Over Agriprocessors

Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld writes in the New York Times Aug. 6:

Unfortunately, this year kosher meat has become a different type of symbol, one not of mourning and spiritual devotion but of ridicule, embarrassment and hypocrisy. In May in Postville, Iowa, immigration officials raided Agriprocessors Inc., the largest kosher meatpacking plant in the country.

News reports and government documents have described abusive practices at Agriprocessors against workers, including minors. This poses a grave problem and calls into question whether the food processed in the plant qualifies as kosher.

Yisroel Salanter, the great 19th-century rabbi, is famously believed to have refused to certify a matzo factory as kosher on the grounds that the workers were being treated unfairly. The affidavit filed in the United States District Court of Northern Iowa, for instance, alleges that an employee was physically abused by a rabbi on the floor of the plant. If true, this calls into question the reliability and judgment of the rabbi in charge of making sure the food was kosher.

What’s more, two workers who oversaw the poultry and beef division were recently arrested for helping illegal immigrants falsify documents. If they were willing to break national immigration laws, one could reasonably ask whether they would be likely to show the same lack of concern for Jewish dietary laws.

Unfortunately, the responses of the leading Orthodox organizations, the Rabbinical Council of America and the Orthodox Union, have, in my opinion, fallen far short of what is needed to be done and have done little to diminish the extent of the desecration of God’s name. What is needed is for the Orthodox Union to appoint an independent commission whose members have not in the past been paid by either the Orthodox Union or Agriprocessors. Such a commission would select a team of rabbinic experts to spend an extended period of time at the plant and then make suggestions and recommendations. This independent team would make sure the plant upholds basic standards of kashrut and worker and animal treatment — and that it is in full compliance with the laws of the United States.

Hebrew National used to run a commercial that said: “We answer to a Higher Authority.” Then we should ask ourselves if our behavior and our values need improvement. 

Posted in Agriprocessors, Orthodox Union, RCA | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Orthodox Rabbi Slams OU, RCA Over Agriprocessors

Ohr Ha Torah Finally Has Its Own Building

Rachel Heller writes:

 It was a sight Mar Vista doesn’t see every day a guitar-studded procession of more than 100 Jewish revelers marching jubilantly down South Barrington Avenue with five Torah scrolls.

Members of Ohr HaTorah synagogue, which until this month held services at a church in West Los Angeles, donned sun hats and sneakers Aug. 8 to carry their Torahs south to the congregation’s new location and first permanent home on Venice Boulevard.

The walk was only 2.8 miles, but the journey was 15 years in the making.

"We finally have a place that feels like home," said Meirav Finley, who co-founded Ohr HaTorah with her husband, Rabbi Mordecai Finley. "We’ve been shlepping for 15 years, getting up at 5 a.m. and loading the prayer books. It’s time to focus our energy on other things."

The Finleys closed escrow on the new site Aug. 1, and renovation began within two days to ready the building for its first Friday night service less than a week later. On that Shabbat, the interior was still far from finished, but the bare walls and scant furnishings only amplified congregants’ joyous voices as they sang and danced around the Torah scrolls in the sanctuary.

Rabbi Finley said the decision to carry the Torahs on foot to the new facility wasn’t based on halachah (Jewish law). Instead, he said, it offered a symbolic parallel of the path the congregation had taken to reach a place of its own.

"It’s about the celebratory aspect," Finley said. "In a way, it symbolizes the journey of Ohr HaTorah. It’s also a way to honor the sifrei Torah, rather than just loading them into a car."

Finley said the move will let the synagogue expand spiritually focused classes and programs for its 300 member families.

"I think our infrastructure is ready to grow," he said. "We can certainly accommodate a greater number of people at services now."

Posted in Ohr Hatorah | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Ohr Ha Torah Finally Has Its Own Building