The most examples of successful racial integration I know are in religious communities. Jews of different races get along fairly well, though they still divide along the lines of Ashkenazi, Persian, Sephardic and may have very little to do with each other, but at least Jews rarely murder each other.
When Ashkenazim and Sephardim are forced to mix in certain rituals, they often end up resenting the influence of the other on their traditional way of doing things.
I grew up a Seventh-Day Adventist, and SDAs are racially diverse. Still, the races didn’t mix much. Virtually all the SDA intellectuals were white. There were white Adventist churches and Korean Adventist churches and in some churches where whites and blacks worshipped together, they sat on different sides. Growing up, I heard a story about a liberal young white woman who deliberately sat with the blacks. They told her, “You think we stink and we think you stink, so go sit with your own.” That story made an impression on me. Even though I knew Adventists of very race, I noticed that they still stayed mainly with their own kind.
Most people I’ve known in a racially mixed marriage told me that it makes things much tougher and very few of them recommend it to me. For instance, I have a thing for Persians, but Ashkenazim who’ve married Persians normally counsel me against it. The most harmonious racially-mixed marriages I’ve seen were white guys with asian women.
Seventh-Day Adventist Tutsis committed genocide against Hutus (SDA and otherwise) in Rwanda in 1994, but I don’t like to think about that because it makes me uncomfortable. The New York Times reported in 2003:
A Protestant clergyman and his son, a physician, were convicted yesterday of genocide and sentenced to prison by the United Nations tribunal dealing with the Rwandan killing frenzy of 1994, in which members of Hutu gangs killed an estimated 800,000 minority Tutsi and moderate Hutu over three months.
The Rev. Elizaphan Ntakirutimana, 78, the former head of the Seventh-day Adventist Church in western Rwanda, was sentenced to 10 years in prison for aiding and abetting genocide. His son, Dr. Gérard Ntakirutimana, 45, who worked at the church’s hospital, received a total sentence of 25 years for the same charges and for shooting two people to death.
With the verdict, Mr. Ntakirutimana became the first clergyman to be convicted of genocide by an international tribunal.
The lengthy trial, which began in September 2001, has drawn new attention to the role of the Christian churches during the massacre. Three Roman Catholic priests are being held on similar charges at the tribunal’s jail in Arusha, Tanzania, the seat of the United Nations tribunal on Rwanda. A fifth, an Anglican bishop, died while in detention.
Posted inAdventist, Whites|Comments Off on Successful Racial Integration
When I talk to people trying to arouse the goyim from their slumber, I often hear them say, “I tell Jared…”
Jared is Jared Taylor, the leader of American Renaissance. He’s a Jew-friendly goy who wants whites to organize in their group interest. He doesn’t want anything for whites that he doesn’t also want for other groups, but he’s concerned that whites are headed for disaster and he has a preference for his own kind.
His thinking is regarded as unsophisticated by many of his most ardent supporters. They point out that white identity is inextricably linked with the Nazis and there is therefore a no-go for most whites. They urge him to pursue instead implicit white identity through classical music concerts and Nascar and the kind of nerdy pursuits that whites particularly enjoy.
I first came to admire Jared Taylor’s talents over 20 years ago, during the dawn of the personal computer age, when he ranked with Jerry Pournelle as the most brilliant PC journalist.
That was the last time there was anything PC about Taylor. He’s now the editor of American Renaissance, a newsletter that applies Bell Curve-type concepts to current social problems in a way that the Mainstream Media should be doing but doesn’t, because it’s been frightened off.
He’s also emerged as a sort of white nationalist, explicitly defending the interests of whites (who, of course, would have been described as “Americans” before the federal government began electing a new people with the 1965 Immigration Act.)
Taylor is a man of commanding voice and mien, Central Casting’s dream of a U.S. Senator. But, needless to say, he will never become a Senator—because he long ago chose to sacrifice popularity for his principles.
Taylor has responded to my critique of his position that I offered in the course of reviewing his organization’s new survey of un-PC facts about race and criminality, The Color Of Crime. He has objected to my calling myself a “citizenist”, arguing:
“‘Citizenism’ assumes that race can be made not to matter, and that citizens will set aside parochial ethnic interests for the good of all…. What course of action would he propose for white people?
“Continue to preach ‘citizenism’ when no one else practices it?
“Continue to fill the country with people who do not hesitate to advance their interests—material, cultural, and biological—at the expense of whites?”
Yet, as the swordsman Inigo Montoya tells the villain Vizzini in the movie The Princess Bride, “I do not think that word means what you think it means.”
I sense (or perhaps merely hope) that millions of Americans feel as I do, in an unarticulated fashion.
But at the moment, Google suggests that I am just about the only person in the country calling himself a “citizenist.” So I think I have a certain right to suggest what the word means.
By “citizenism,” I mean that I believe Americans should be biased in favor of the welfare of our current fellow citizens over that of the six billion foreigners.
It seems to me that the most famous example in history of the goyim (whites) organizing in their self-interest was Nazi Germany and that did not go well. Most people feel an inherent sense of horror and revulsion at the idea of whites organizing in their group interest.
It’s fine for every other group to organize in their self-interest — including Jews, blacks, latinos, asians, gays, women, etc — because they have historically been persecuted by whites. According to the conventional wisdom, when whites organize in their group interest, it too often leads to evil and genocide. It’s just gross. It’s unseemly. It’s uncool. It’s bad for the Jews.
Women are often the majority on college campuses but it is fine for them to organize in their group interest because women are oppressed. It’s fine for Jews in Israel to organize a Jewish state because Jews have been oppressed. It’s a good thing to want Tibet for the Tibetans but it is a bad thing to want America for white people (even though the United States was historically an 80-90% white country, now down to 62% and heading for minority status by 2042 according to census projections).
Whites are a minority in California but because they have more money and power than latinos it is wrong for whites to organize in their group interest. After all, there is no such thing as “white” as a group identity and these mythical “whites” have no group interests, no group consciousness, and no group culture.
Posted inWhites|Comments Off on Should The Goyim Organize In Their Group Interest?
…The Wallenberg dispute was merely a warmup for the conflict between the director and Hier over credit for Genocide. Hier called Schwartzman and told him that the board had suggested he receive a cowriter’s credit. Schwartzman argued that historian Martin Gilbert had written the bulk of the script, but after Hier convinced Gilbert to share the credit, the director agreed to the change. Later, Hier would also successfully claim a producer’s credit—the one that would enable him to receive an Oscar for the film.
Growing up as a WASP, this elbowing for credit was regarded as unseemly. WASPs are awful at accepting credit and receiving compliments. It makes them uncomfortable because they feel they are filled with sin. I can’t imagine Protestant clergy I’ve known battle for such Hollywood credits. I have not met many Jews who feel that they are full of sin. Jews are happy to take compliments and are often eager to receive credit. The Jews I’ve known have, in general, a more positive sense of self than the Protestants I’ve known. The blacks I’ve known have, in general, have more self-esteem than whites, latinos and asians. From what I’ve seen, whites and asians are more often morose, self-doubting, nerdy and neurotic than blacks.
Posted inJews|Comments Off on Is It Unseemly To Elbow For Credit?
Hier’s remarkable success is, in fact, the primary cause of his detractors’ dissatisfaction. “He’s like a high-rent, ethical version of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton,” said Luke Ford, a Los Angeles blogger who covers the Jewish world and has written about Hier. “A fantastic hustler. He knows how to work with the goyim, he’s a master of it, he knows how to do it in a way that brings status to him and to the Jews.” For his part, Hier has heard all the queries and complaints before and often jumps in to answer them—even before they have been asked. “Some of the critics say, ‘Why do you use stars?’ ” he told me. “Well, who should we use? We could say like this: Chaim Bernstein is narrating the first film, Shoshana Feldman is narrating the second film. That won’t go anywhere.”
…And some observers see Moriah’s appeal as even more directly linked to Hier. “Jews dominate Hollywood, and this guy is an authentic Jew. He’s Orthodox. So, he’s the real deal,” said Ford. “And so if you work for free for him, you’re doing the real thing for the Jews, and you’re enhancing your status in Hollywood. There’s no downside to it. You network with other powerful people in Hollywood, and it’s just win-win-win.” Ford argues that working with Moriah is a means of building one’s Hollywood cachet. “It’s like the opposite of saying anything bad about Jews,” said Ford, who mentions Mel Gibson’s tirades as an example of a career-ending anti-Semitic faux pas. “It shows how cool you are. It’s the ultimate fashion statement. And you’re doing it for someone who’s got a really good brand.”
Posted inR. Marvin Hier|Comments Off on Rabbi Marvin Hier’s Legacy
No way! So why is the United States allowing a Jew (Jack Weinstein) to command its nuclear arsenal? Do the goyim have any reason to be upset? You can find a string of anti-Jewish websites online lamenting this news.
I don’t have a dog in this fight. I don’t care that Israel is a nationalist Jewish state and would never allow a goy to command its nuclear weapons and I don’t care whether or not the United States appoints a Jew to command its nuclear weapons. It’s all good by me! I prefer to be an observer rather than an activist.
For most Americans, American Jews are their fellow citizens. Few people in the West today regard Jews as unworthy of citizenship. The Jewish Question is dead.
Cristian Bökös: “For the same reason why 52% of Americans voted a Kenyan-born,half-white president educated by muslims and communists,whose black father was not even American.”
I get it. The United States is a multi-racial democracy that does not see skin color, religion, ethnicity when it comes to appointing its citizens to power. So therefore it is morally superior to all other states that do consider these matters, right?
If Jack Weinstein does anything wrong, Jews will get blamed. So perhaps it is best if Jews don’t rise to such powerful positions?
Is there not enough in the Torah to keep us busy? Do we have to command the goyim’s nuclear weapons?
I found an anti-Jewish thread on FB and posted: If we Jews are the puppet masters, why are you goyim so stupid to go along with this? Why are you incapable of managing your own destiny?
I am just curious, why have you yet to prevail when our numbers are so small? Based on the things you guys are saying, you are really pathetic.
You guys sound like blacks complaining about how you can’t get ahead because of the Man. Perhaps you should study harder and work harder and take charge of your own destiny instead of whining about others keeping you down.
Posted inIsrael, Jews|Comments Off on Would Israel Allow A Non-Jew To Command Its Nuclear Arsenal?
A Brooklyn-based Jewish newspaper apologized for a column that was sharply critical of the haredi Orthodox community and fired its author.
The Jewish Press dismissed Yori Yanover, its Israel-based online editor, after he published an article Monday with the headline “50 Thousand Haredim March So Only Other Jews Die in War.”
Yanover was writing about a mass prayer rally of haredi Jews in Manhattan on Sunday against a proposed Israeli law to draft yeshiva students.
“They flooded downtown Manhattan with the anti-draft for Haredim message: everybody else is welcome to get themselves killed,” Yanover wrote. “What was even more astonishing was their honesty regarding the bankruptcy of their entire school of faith and study.”
The Jewish Press removed the article from its website. The paper’s publishers, Jerry Greenwald and Naomi Mauer, issued a statement saying the paper “apologizes to its readers for the unfortunate Op-Ed article, along with its incendiary and insulting headline.”
According to the statement, the article “was posted without authorization and approval of The Jewish Press newspaper” and “the sentiments expressed in the article and headline do not represent these of The Jewish Press, its officers, editors, and staff.”
In a letter to The Jewish Press posted Tuesday on his Facebook page, Yanover said he had authorization to publish the article.
Posted inYori Yanover|Comments Off on Yori Yanover Launches The Jewish Independent
Why is this story getting so much media attention? Because it is compelling. It is great human drama and it exemplifies a way of thinking that half of society regards as evil — racism.
Steve Sailer points out how the New York Times wants to paint Donald Sterling as “Southern” rather than as “Jewish”:
… For decades it was perfectly acceptable to let him run his team like “a Southern plantationlike structure,” as the former Clippers general manager Elgin Baylor once charged in a lawsuit. …
That suit also accused Sterling of running his franchise with the mentality of a Southern plantation owner, as a man who preferred a team of “poor black boys from the South” who were “playing for a white coach.”
Baylor lost the lawsuit, but among the most shocking parts of it — just like the most shocking aspect of the most recent accusations against Sterling — was how long Baylor put up with “the Southern plantation” mentality before standing up for himself.
I suspect that half of society has sympathy for Donald Sterling’s remarks, whether or not they are conscious of it. Very few whites and asians, despite their protestations to the contrary, will live near many blacks and latinos and they do not want their kids to go to school with many black and latino kids and they do not want to socialize with many blacks and latinos and they do not want to work around many blacks and latinos. That’s the way whites and asians around the world choose to live their lives and the tiny number of whites and asians who operate differently in this regard are statistically insignificant.
Race is an open sore in America because we have so many races here. Whenever there are multiple races in one area, there is conflict and tragedy. The races don’t get along. They never have. When multiple races are in one area, they compete until one race comes out on top and sets the rules for the rest who lump it or leave.
This Donald Sterling story is delicious because we get to talk about things that are of visceral interest to most people but are not acceptable to talk about in public such as not wanting blacks around in your real life because they commit so many crimes.
This conflict is so Jewish. I’ve met many Jews who are just like these characters Donald Sterling and Siamak Ebrahim Nehoray. Many Jews I’ve known worry much less about public propriety than do the WASPs I’ve known. When you look at those who get arrested for adventurous tactics on Wall Street, it is rarely WASPs. About half the time, in my memory, it is Jews and the rest are often Indians and other minorities.
Sterling made much of his money as a trial lawyer, another Jewish occupational specialty. He apparently gives away vast sums. Jews are generous people. And he wants to be noticed for his charity, another Jewish trait. (Yes, most people want to be noticed for their good deeds, but Jews tend to have less shame in pursuing this than non-Jews, particularly WASPs.)
Most Jews are nothing like Donald Sterling, but about 10% of the Jews I’ve met remind me of him in their shamelessness (while no WASP I’ve known has reminded me of Donald Sterling). Why are they shameless? Because they don’t care what the goyim thinks of them. Hostility to the majority culture has helped keep Jews intact as a unique group for thousands of years.
I don’t think Sterling is a horrible person. I think he’s crude and a self-made over-achiever who, at times, makes my skin crawl. His taped remarks splashed all over TMZ, however, don’t make me think any worse of him, just as I don’t necessarily think badly of anyone who says extreme things in private while in great emotional distress.
I don’t think Jews are better or worse than other people. I think Jews are different. In some ways, they are different good and in other ways they are different bad.
Donald Sterling discriminated in housing? So what. Almost all whites and asians discriminate in housing in that they won’t live around many blacks and latinos. All Jewish communities in the non-Jewish world are built with deliberate housing discrimination wherein Jews won’t sell to non-Jews in a particular neighborhood so that it can stay dominantly Jewish.
The more religious you get in Jewish life, the more negative the view of blacks (in general, individual exceptions). The more traditional you get in any way of non-black life, the more negative the views of blacks.
One overlooked aspect of the remarkably tawdry Clippers Brouhaha is its personal injury/divorce lawyer flavor. That’s how Donald Sterling got his start, and he maintains the bulletproof ego of a sleazeball lawyer who knows it pays to advertise, no matter how badly. When he first bought the Clippers, he put up hundreds of billboards featuring a giant portrait — not of his best player, but of himself. He constantly runs poorly Photoshopped ads in the Los Angeles Times of himself accepting awards from civil rights organizations and other charities.
Via Kevin Drum, here’s Sterling’s latest of countless self-congratulatory LA Times ad.
Sterling’s mistress’s lawyer isn’t exactly Charles Evan Hughes, either.
Siamak Ebrahim Nehoray is a graduate of Memphis State (maybe he met some ballers there?) and the University of Laverne College of Law. He was suspended in 2004 by the state bar association for playing fast and loose with a small amount of a client’s funds.
Most Jews are not sleazy like these guys but there’s a shamelessness to their behavior that few WASPs could pull off.
If you give your typical Protestant a compliment, they will try to shrug it off. Oh no, not me, I’m a big sinner. Give a Jew a compliment, and he’ll ask for another one. Jews tend to feel great about themselves while Protestants believe they’re full of sin. I haven’t met many Jews who feel they are full of sin.
Jews tend to have more sex partners than do non-Jews (see the 1994 University of Chicago sex survey, the most comprehensive ever) and speak more matter of factly about the great human passions such as sex, money and the desire for honor and power.
Listen to the way Sterling talks about a hooker during a deposition. This is the type of frankness I’ve encountered among a significant number of Jews (a minority of all Jews, but still a large enough number to make an impression on me).
In my experience, Jewish life is 100x more likely to honor such sleazy characters as Donald Sterling than people who expose them through journalism, because journalists are poor and sleazy characters are often rich.
Talkshow host Larry King has been married eight time, often to non-Jews, and was honored by an Aish HaTorah banquet (while Aish HaTorah kicked me out in 1998 for blogging about the sleazy Jews of the porn industry). The lay leader of Aish HaTorah, Richard Horowitz, signed a few weeks ago an embarrassing consent decree with the SEC for wrongdoing. He still leads Aish HaTorah and his son Michael leads Adas Torah (despite an ongoing SEC investigation). You won’t lose most communal honor in Jewish life if you do white collar crime just so long as you donate lots of money to Jewish causes.
On his radio show today, Dennis Prager tells a self-described Torah-observant black non-Jew about Donald Sterling: “He’s a Jew, but he isn’t Jewish. He was born into a Jewish family. It’s not like he leads a Jewish life, not even talking morally, religiously, ethnically, anything. If he observes Torah, I will broadcast from your house for the next year and I will write a Torah with you.”
As first reported in these pages, Sterling initially denied under oath having an affair with Castro, but subsequently admitted to paying her for “sucking me all night long.” Sterling described Castro as a “total freak” and “piece of trash” whom he paid $500 per “trick.” Describing his relationship with Castro, Sterling testified, “It was purely sex for money, money for sex, sex for money, money for sex,” adding that the couple would have sex “all over my building, in my bathroom, upstairs, in the corner, in the elevator.”
A review of Sterling’s testimony offers further details of how, according to the wealthy businessman, he was victimized by a predatory, sex-crazed younger woman. Deposition highlights included:
* Sterling testified, “All this woman did was call me every other day and asked me if she could suck me, if she could come in and give me a trick or if she could lick me.”
* When asked about a trip he took to Paris and Rome with Castro, Sterling replied, “For sex. I travelled with her for sex.” Though he could not always perform due to “all of these nine pills a day,” Sterling noted, “But whenever we traveled anywhere on the trip, she kept a record. And she told me how much I owed her, and I paid her. I paid her for every time we ever fooled around.”
* Recalling that, “We went to Paris to have sex,” Sterling testified that Castro wanted to tryst in an airplane bathroom, but “I wasn’t physically able to.” Sterling and Castro were joined on that European trip by Castro’s mother, who flew to Italy on the businessman’s dime. After spending time with his mistress and her mom, Sterling testified that he met up with his wife for the remainder of his overseas vacation.
* Sterling, then nearly 70, was apparently irresistible to Castro: “Every time that girl saw me she grabbed my body. She wanted to pull something and have sex.”
* Testifying about having sex at Castro’s Los Angeles apartment, Sterling recalled, “The minute I walk in, she has got a dirty video on the TV, the filthiest, dirtiest, ugliest video. That is supposed to get me hot.” Sterling added that Castro told him the video was a gift from boxer Mike Tyson, whom she previously dated.
* As to whether he had asked Castro to speak with a doctor “about whether she could become pregnant,” Sterling bristled. “Here a man is having a relationship, sex for money with a woman. He is quietly concealing it from the world…It is ridiculous. It is ludicrous.”* On the transactional nature of his dealings with Castro, Sterling said, “I paid her $500 a trick. Every time she provided sex she got $500.”
* Castro was insatiable, Sterling claimed. “The woman wanted sex everywhere. She wanted it in the alley, in her car, in the elevator, in the upstairs seventh floor, in the bathroom.”
* Sterling–an exacting customer–made it clear that cash he gave Castro was not a “gift.” He testified, “I was paying her. It was in exchange for sex. It wasn’t a gift. I wasn’t giving her money without her performing something for me. And if it wasn’t good, I wouldn’t give her anything. It was money for sex. How can you say it was a gift? If a man has an affair with a prostitute, is that a gift? It is not a gift.” (9 pages)
It sounds like there’s a much more interesting story going on with the Donald T. Sterling donnybrook than anybody has been investigating yet. I don’t know how far this story might go, but it just might go all the way from Magic Johnson to somebody really interesting.
For years, I’ve been pointing out that much of the hoopla over racism and sexism isn’t actually about blacks or women or whatever. Instead, it serves as a cover story for ambitious, clever men to get what they want. For example, I’ve long been fascinated by how mortgage lenders like Angelo Mozilo, Roland Arnall, and Kerry Killinger used the rhetoric of the War on Racist Redlining to blow up the housing bubble.
Obsess over racism; pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!
But in the Sterling Story, who is The Man?
I’ll offer a theory about why the man might be Magic Johnson, who desperately wants Donald Sterling’s NBA franchise now that the Buss family says they won’t sell his old Lakers. But Magic was the front man in the purchase of the Los Angeles Dodgers two years ago. So it might be Magic’s big money backers in Guggenheim Partners.
Donald Sterling is like a combination of all of the Jewish characters on the TV show Ray Donovan.
I’m reading this Los Angeles Times profile of Sterling and he reminds me of some Jews I know:
* Very talkative and open about the natural passions such as sex that most non-Jews keep quiet about publicly.
* Not afraid to tell you about what he does for his people and how others don’t do for their people.
* “Sterling’s business savvy, intermittent charm and charitable contributions had insulated him from the consequences of his eccentric behavior.”
* “Sterling had worked hard to create his own reality, spending millions on newspaper ads promoting his real estate empire, his charity work and himself — even as his Clippers were perennial losers and he was accused in lawsuits of discriminating against minority tenants whose rent payments helped make him rich.” King Solomon was also a huge philanthropist and self-promoter. It’s a Jewish thing.
* Jews are rarely afraid to tell you about how great they are. WASPs, by contrast, are more reticent while Catholics fall in between. “In his penthouse office in Beverly Hills, Sterling often showed visitors a Louis XIV desk, paintings by Rembrandt and Renoir and centuries-old Chinese antiques. He eagerly dropped celebrity names, bragging that he bought properties from Elizabeth Taylor and John Wayne, and once boasted of plans to buy an NFL franchise.”
* Jews tend to be more physically demonstrative than non-Jews and to need less body space. They often don’t worry about such goyisha concerns as manners. “Some associates cringed at Sterling’s habit of invading their space.”
* Jews have a different relationship to blacks. “Sterling’s recent troubles began in April when his remarks about blacks became public.” On the one hand, they’ll be more likely to vote similarly to blacks and on the other hand, they’ll likely demonstrate more fear about the presence of blacks when walking down the street and they’ll move away more quickly if blacks take up residence in their community.
* Jews tend to be more open with their emotions than non-Jews and secular Jews in particular frequently demonstrate little shame about things that would appall the goyim. “Sterling never hid his infatuation with Stiviano, the personal assistant and caretaker he described as his lover. He stared at her. When they didn’t sit together, he waved. To some in the Clippers organization, the relationship created deep concern.”
* Jews are more verbally violent than non-Jews but less physically violent. “On a conference call in early June, Sterling threatened to “take out” his wife’s lawyer, Pierce O’Donnell. Hours later, Sterling left profane, threatening messages for the doctors who deemed him unfit.”
Posted inDonald Sterling, Jews|Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Sterling v. Nehoray: Battle of the lowlife lawyers
As part of Professor Jennifer Thompson’s American Jewish Experience, Introduction to Judaism, and Jewish Ethics and Society courses at CSUN, students conducted research on Jewish sites in the San Fernando and Conejo Valleys. The student projects involved historical research on the sites as well as in-person visits that allowed students to experience the sites first-hand. Besides the sources students discovered on their own, they consulted the chapter on Judaism from How to be a Perfect Stranger, and Bruce A. Phillips’s 2007 article “Faultlines: The Seven Socio-Ecologies of Jewish Los Angeles” in The Jewish Role in American Life: An Annual Review (vol. 5).
You can learn more about the project and Jennifer Thompson from a March 2013 article in the Los Angeles Jewish Journal.
I notice Jews getting up in arms about John Kerry’s statements on Holocaust Memorial Day. I don’t see why the non-Jewish majority, even John Kerry, need to modify their behavior to accommodate any Jewish holiday or observance, including Holocaust Memorial Day, which traditional Orthodox Jews don’t observe anyway. So count me as non-offended.
I also don’t care about the statement that Israel is becoming an apartheid state. I don’t think it is an accurate charge, but I saw nothing evil in apartheid. It allowed for the most prosperous state in all of Africa.
It’s time the goyim buck up and stop worrying about minority sensibilities and instead pursue their group interest as passionately as Jews, blacks, Chinese and others tribesmen do. Jews, without shame, run a Jewish state of Israel and the goyim can lump it if they don’t like it. I think that’s great. I love Jewish nationalism.
I wish South Africans whites were as devoted to maintaining their white society as Jews are in carving out a Jewish state. I believe in nationalism for everyone.
Exclusive: Kerry Warns Israel Could Become ‘An Apartheid State’
The secretary of state said that if Israel doesn’t make peace soon, it could become ‘an apartheid state,’ like the old South Africa. Jewish leaders are fuming over the comparison.
If there’s no two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict soon, Israel risks becoming “an apartheid state,” Secretary of State John Kerry told a room of influential world leaders in a closed-door meeting Friday.
Senior American officials have rarely, if ever, used the term “apartheid” in reference to Israel, and President Obama has previously rejected the idea that the word should apply to the Jewish state. Kerry’s use of the loaded term is already rankling Jewish leaders in America—and it could attract unwanted attention in Israel, as well.
"This guy knows all the gossip, the ins and outs, the lashon hara of the Orthodox world. He’s an [expert] in... all the inner workings of the Orthodox world." (Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff)
