What Do Russians & Democrats Have In Common?

What does Russian TV and America TV have in common?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* … stoking minority & immigrant anger is Standard Operating Procedure for the USSR stooge news outlet RT, which I occasionally watch for the same perspective our media gives. I’d like to say RT gives a different perspective than say Faux news or MSNBC, unfortunately, its more of the same with the constant attempts to rile up minorities.

Objectively watch for yourself for an hour or two: “rile up minorities” is on their daily “to do list”, (on fox it’s a constant whine about them- which angers minorities toward conservatives for some strange reason) …

The Democratic party platform has the same platform of the Old USSR (as if that 70 year social experiment criminal mafia train wreck collapse never happened).

“Wreck America as fast as possible through any means”

* Dominicans booing the Mayor of NYC because of his support for Haitians in the Dominican Republic.

* What the Russians don’t seem to realize is that their potential allies in 2015 USA, conservatives and traditionalists, have no use for pandering to minorities after 50 years of the so-called Great Society. At a time where we are disillusioned by our own elites who seem hellbent on destroying our culture, both demographically and morally, we might see a potential friend in a re-Christianizing Russia.

But Russia is so ticked off over the way our elites have treated her that she jumps on any chance to show them up as hypocrites. Hence, RT focuses on Ferguson and takes a stand somewhat similar to the NY Times and MSNBC.

The irony of course is this. While Russia thinks she is pointing out the hypocrisy of our ruling elite, she is really just giving them the ammunition to continue with their destructive policies. Instead of being embarrassed about being hypocrites in the way we treat our minorities, the elite can point to the fact that even Putin’s Russia thinks we treat our blacks poorly so you cuckservatives better shut up and let us double down on the Great Society. This only confirms what our foremost public intellectual preaches about reparations. If anything, we haven’t done enough.

Somebody needs to explain to the Russians this ain’t 1965, and that if they ever intend to get any sympathetic souls in the West, they should play up to the people who are opposed to what is happening in our countries. After all the elites of the USA and Western Europe are a common enemy of both Russia and Western/USA conservatives and traditionalists.

* I’ve seen pro-Kremlin media in Russia praise Trump. The Kremlin will support any opposition movement in the US for the same reason that it supports Marine Le Pen in France. If someone with Pat Buchanan’s views mounted a credible campaign for the White House again, RT’s coverage of race in America would flip by 180 degrees.

The Russian liberal opposition is entirely paid for by the US State Department (the neocons) and Sorosite NGOs. Responding in kind would be a dream come true for the Kremlin.

* RT’s job is to point out the deficiencies of American society along with covering various news stories. It’s not totally objective and neither are any other news sources; viewers have to read between the lines. That RT and the NYT might converge on certain issues is probably just coincidental, in this case since both are only willing to recognize nurture and reject any hint of nature then of course all coverage of black dysfunction is going to be similar. RT is worth watching, along with some of the other foreign news outlets, as long as one keeps in mind what they’re trying to do.

* Comments on Reddit are running heavily against BlackLivesMatter. This is a useful barometer of informed, left-leaning, white opinion.

An example of the comments at Reddit:

“Isn’t this the place where the officer was vindicated by evidence, to include autopsies performed by people appointed by Mr. Brown’s family? And where “witnesses” were caught lying about what they witnessed?

Yup. There are many cases where police shootings are unjustified but I can’t for the life of me figure out how people think this one was.

The media ran with a narrative and refused to back down as the facts came out. They played it as a national tragedy and by God they were sticking to it!”

The BLM women at Bernie’s rally are being seen as a summary of BLM insanity by the Reddit crowd:

“It’s just sickening. The #BLM movement forced Bernie off stage and demanded a 4 1/2 minute moment of silence for Michael Brown. Of all people?! He is the martyr? Really?! Someone that, on video, had just committed a robbery 1! He then charged an officer and was justifiably shot and killed by an officer, as proven by the non-indictment of the officer involved. I just don’t get it. Then his supporters start shooting and looting in honor of the anniversary of his death?! There’s a reason people quickly dismiss the whole #BlackLivesMatter thing. If they don’t give a shit about killing one another; how do they expect people to respect the message they claim to project?”

The video of the Sanders rally is a superbly concise summary of BLM insanity.

* I think it more likely that he [Putin] is trying to undermine America’s owners’ attempts to meddle in his country. After all, the political instability right on his border is worrying and that large slide in oil prices does not help Russia very much and efforts to prevent the South Stream gas pipeline were pretty successful.

* As someone who actually pays the taxes that pay the police, I would very much enjoy more patrols in my neighborhood. More people would go out strolling at night, more people would let their kids out to play.

Believe it or not, I’m not at all worried that a policeman will gun down my son.

* “Seriously, why do blacks have to act this way?”

Well, I think that William Lind would say that it’s a form of low-intensity Fourth Generation War by which irregular combatants drive foreigners (i.e., whites), including the foreign army (i.e., police) from their territory, while exacting economic costs upon the enemy, including ransom monies (i.e., welfare, affirmative action, etc.).

Posted in America, Blacks, Russia | Comments Off on What Do Russians & Democrats Have In Common?

Why The Lack Of Diversity In America’s Special Forces?

Mainly white guys. Very few black guys.

So I’m watching S3E2 of Ray Donovan. It’s about a pissed off Navy Seal. And he’s a black guy. And he talks about this book he read.

I love how Jewish TV smashes stereotypes.

Steve Sailer notes: “Because everybody knows African-Americans tend to be multilingual cosmopolitans so fascinated by other cultures around the world that they barely take any interest in their own. Black Twitter, for example, is constantly abuzz with detailed anthropological discussions of Central Asian cultures.”

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I find it ironic that when Obama needed his keynote accomplishment of his first term, he turned to the whitest part of the military to do it for him.

* The statistical innumeracy of these journalists is grating. Everyone, not just the military wants these talented blacks but the talent they are after, the talented hundredth or one thousandth, everyone else wants too. Why should they want to get shot at and work hard for relatively lower pay?

Hollywood has a lot to answer for with their depictions of blacks as elite hackers and physicians in every movie these days. There must be a market for movies with more realistic casting.

* Affirmative action for promotions is terribly off-putting. The up-or-out system is harsh enough without the brass putting race ahead of skills and accomplishments. And being assigned to nursemaid blacks just so they can be unfairly promoted ahead of you is as demeaning as being told to train your H1B replacement.

* What this article doesn’t go into is that the SF community is only the right side of a gradient. The Green Berets have fewer blacks than regular infantry, who have fewer than the artillery, who have fewer than the mechanics…all the way down to the cooks (who I believe still have the lowest entry requirements). Incidentally, this means that support companies are often “rowdier” in the legal sense than the actual killers, for all the familiar reasons. The controlling factor here isn’t necessarily test scores (AFQT/GT score) but “pointyness”. However I have noticed that intelligent blacks seem to favor the Signal Corps over Military Intelligence. I think the cultural introversion you alluded to is a factor here, although I wouldn’t rule out path-dependence playing a role (this is the politically correct answer, which doesn’t mean there’s nothing to it. It probably explains why blacks prefer the Army to other services).

* I went to West Point. When I graduated, and for pretty much forever, everybody was ranked from first to last based on a certain formula incorporating school grades, physical fitness, and observed military aptitude, then picked their job post-graduation in that order. If you were at the end, you either did something unpleasant or struck a deal to sign over more years in exchange for avoiding the Chemical Corps.

There are rumblings that soon they will start including an interview or some other “holistic” method of assigning jobs. The Naval Academy already does this, and as best as I can tell the process is mostly hated because of its tendency to assign people to the submarine service against their will. Anyway, I can recognize a thumb being put on the scale as well as any other iSteve reader. Apparently, the problem is that not only are blacks likely to rank lower in the list (duh) but even controlling for that they often prefer to choose non-combat jobs. The place is clearly dragging its feet on implementing this–the counterarguments are obvious–but they’re probably only one ambitious general away from implementing it anyway.

* For a long time in the 20th Century, New Yorkers believed that upstate American Indians held so many high paying jobs working skyscraper construction because they weren’t afraid of heights. Finally one Indian spilled the beans: Nah, it’s as terrifying for us as for anybody else, but the pay is good so we shut up about it.

* This low rate of black participation among the combat arms and special operations forces is not surprising. I noticed it when I was in the army. I recall back in 1991 when Jesse Jackson and others were trying to shake down the USG over the Gulf War by saying we were about to spend mega money on a war where blacks would be doing most of the dying, or at the very least in numbers disproportionate to their share of the population. Yet USG was not willing to spend sufficient money on jobs for the black community. I remember arguing with white SJWs at the time trying to explain to them that the bulk of the black soldiers were in support roles and were not at risk of being killed.

Now the complaint is there aren’t enough blacks in the combat arms or special ops forces. This is getting silly. Blacks complain when they are supposedly overrepresented and complain when they are underrepresented. It all depends upon how the nation views the military at the time.

For example, WW2 was the so-called good war fought by the greatest generation. But blacks were generally kept out of combat units. But since those combat units are celebrated to this day, they complain that they weren’t allowed to fight. Never mind feeling sorry for the whites who HAD no choice.

Vietnam turned out to be highly unpopular. So blacks complained they served in disproportionate numbers in the infantry. But this was only 20 years after they complained about not being allowed to serve in such roles in WW2.

Now the military is popular again and people are making movies about the SEAL sniper and we’ve had several Medal of Honor winners who are seemingly all from the combat arms and are all white. So blacks are complaining because they are getting no MoHs, or being the made the subject of a cool sniper film.

Whites serve not for the fame, but because they want to serve. Blacks should do the same and not worry about how popular the military is or is not at the time. And the military should not have to cater to them. If they want to join the combat arms and special ops for the right reasons, they will. If not, so be it.

* These things have less to do with getting blacks in and more to do with getting whites out. The same thing’s going on in engineering. Everyone knows the space program and computers were almost solely due to white men, and that drives certain people crazy. So they push minorities and girls into technology whether they want to do it or not. They don’t care whether women are actually achieving anything, or even whether they’re happy, they just need some to show on their websites and news releases, so that people stop thinking of technology as being the overwhelmingly white and Asian male accomplishment it surely still is. NASA gives dozens of contracts to firms based on demographically correct ownership, but white men are still doing most of the work. Call it brownwashing or pinkwashing.

* Special forces draws heavily from populations that use firearms a lot and get around where there aren’t many roads. That includes a lot of Indians. The perfect special forces recruit would be an athletic, smart kid who spent his summers zooming around on a dirt bike plinking coyotes. Sounds like normal recreational activities on the rez. The kids who avoid drinking and sniffing inhalants, play on the tribal basketball/football team and score in the top 10% in class are probably shoe-ins for that kind of military work.

* Indian stereotype: serious; observant; doesn’t smile or laugh; doesn’t run his mouth (actually, doesn’t seem to even like talking)
* Black stereotype: usually not uptight, except in reaction to slights real or imagined; puts on headphones during long speeches or listing of instructions/rules; fond of firing “warning shots” to defuse/escalate a confrontation

* I wonder if anyone who is fretting about “diversity” realizes how destructive that concept is to any kind of concept of “esprit de corps” in a military outfit. I knew a lot of black Marines and I knew a number of guys in the Marines or Navy who were — now that I look back on it — probably gay, but you didn’t talk about those things, you were part of a group, and you had to accomplish the mission (whatever that was) together.

The last thing we need is Affirmative Action in the armed services, whether it pertains to blacks, women, gays, trans, what have you. It’s just incredibly destructive to morale and it destroys any concept of group cohesion. And without that kind of concept, you will not succeed.

Native Americans? My experience is that people strive to live up to their stereotypes. I’ve known Jews who were not particularly bright or business savvy but who as a matter of personal pride worked to acquire some competence there. Same with black guys and physical matters. Same with Native Americans when it came to things like marksmanship, orienteering, scouting, etc. They were supposed to be good at those things, so even if they weren’t they worked at it until they were.

* A friend of mine said when he went through Ranger School (twice, he got recycled) all the black guys washed out because of difficulty related to swimming. He also said that all the white guys were predominantly from the rural south.

* I was in Army Special Forces. Here are some of the reasons I think blacks are underrepresented.

1. They don’t swim very well. This is a must pass requirement for special operators. Special Forces are expected to be able to operate in the water. If they can’t, they’ll drown. When I went through the selection program, I noticed that many of the blacks failed the swim test. The Special Forces leadership actually did a convincing study on how black women’s hair was a big part of the “problem.” Black women have weaves that don’t do well in the water, so they never take their kids to the pool, so black kids don’t learn to swim.

2. Many black soldiers and officers avoid combat arms. As it was previously mentioned, most blacks join the army for a career, not for adventure. (I remember in ROTC that the commander encouraged blacks to consider combat arms because they were getting criticized about the unbalanced numbers.) Working in logistics or personnel is better preparation for a civilian career than slitting throats. Most Special Operations recruit from within the military, not from the civilian population. Now you don’t have to be combat arms to volunteer for Special Operations, but those with combat arms experience are more likely to volunteer for spec-ops, and more likely to make it through selection where there’s a lot of ruck marching, land navigation, sleeping outdoors, small unit tactics, and general field craft. I remember one black candidate, a cook, who quit because he was tired of eating just MREs.

3. Lower IQ. We had to take an IQ test in selection. I’m sure it was there for a reason. I did notice that obviously stupid people tended to quit or were not selected. If you can’t look at a map and match it to the terrain around you, you won’t be able to navigate very well and you’ll get lost all the time. We just can’t have our operators wandering around aimlessly in Afghanistan.

I’m certain that racism didn’t play a big role. Most of the activities in selection and in the qualification coarse are cut and dry objective criteria. You either got lost or you didn’t. You either finished the ruck march on time or you didn’t. You can swim or you can’t. There was a subjective portion because all candidates’ files went before the selection board who made the final decision on who stayed and who went home, but many of these people were themselves minorities, and all of them were under some pressure to increase the number of minorities in the ranks.

One question I’ve always had was why there were so few Asians in Special Operations. The media only seems to be concerned when blacks are underrepresented.

* We are constantly being told “black lives matter” and serving in the Special Forces is the most dangerous thing you can do in the military. But now they’re complaining that not enough of those precious black bodies are being put in harm’s way? Dafuq! Make up your minds.

* Tom Wolfe wrote about the officer ranks being something of a hereditary caste in 1979′s “The Right Stuff.” Many things in America have become more caste-like since then, so I wouldn’t be surprised if it were more so now.

* It is rapidly becoming clearer that the Constitutional system of checks and balances has broken down, leaving the President free to do largely as he or she pleases. I’ve sometimes wondered whether what might already have happened if the US military’s officer corps had remained mostly white Southerners. A future coup might well materialize among special operations forces, although I think they would need the cooperation of certain sections of NSA. Putting more blacks into special operations makes sense from a coup avoidance point of view, not from any desire to enhance effectiveness.

* Considering the US Military has been the tool of DC and NY, and has been a force for social change, and a key pillar of movement conservatism, I can say that anything that complicates their mission is a good thing.

So bring on the trannies, bring on diversity initiatives for fighting units, turn up the sensitivity training.

People get goose bumps thinking about those white alpha types. But just remember who they serve, and who they continue to serve. Contra the fevered imagination of patriot types, these guys will never turn against the system. It gives them a chance to go play at Captain America with cool toys and a nice pension for the lifers or perks (tangible or intangible) for the short-termers who “served” “their” country. Oh they might grumble a bit, but in the end, like the Evangelicals, they are worse than useless.

* I love the diversity scam — we are inherently, substantively different because of our demographics, except that equality somehow demands there be no differences in demographic outcomes because we are also inherently, substantively the same.

We are apparently distinctions without a difference.

We can treat people differently based on their race because they are inherently different and inherently the same all at once. We are “samedifferent” so the government and institutions are always ready to discriminate to either obtain “diversity” or to “close the gap”.

And by the way, no need to test individuals to find out if individual blacks have that “black” diversity or if any particular woman has “female diversity” — they all do! These are the racial and gender stereotypes that progressives and instituions believe with religious devotion.

* Back in the 70s I was in an all-black battalion on Ft.Bragg. The special forces trainees needed mock guerillas to organize and fight, so a bunch of us were dragooned from our drug and wine-infested barracks to run around in the woods for three weeks in our civilian clothes. The black guys showed up in orange disco pants and platform shoes. They were not happy campers living out in the swamp in that attire. The white guys had a blast however and were dejected when it all came to an end. I remember one Southern cracker who caught a large snake and roasted it for us over a campfire. Good times.

But now the special forces needs Diversity!

What this initiative is all about is to prepare our Diversity Army to engage in African civil wars that will further enlarge the pipeline of African immigrants to the US. The vicious conflicts we conduct there will also provide a showcase for women’s careers. Much cucktography will grace our popular press with imagery of ascendant female military leaders nurturing crowds of ebony African kids while smudged with war makeup and showing signs of office PTSD.

* I live in the African capital of Chicago. That area where you have the greatest preponderance of African immigrants. You can spot them and distinguish from a native born American negro.

The African is darker in skin color, does not dress in the outrageous manner, and does not walk in an outrageous manner with the strut and swagger, that side to side motion. The African appears as normal persons.

Also the black African DOES NOT POSSESS THAT CHIP ON SHOULDER ATTITUDE.

* Mark Thompson, Yahoo! News, February 24, 2012:

In nature, most seals are black, with relatively few white ones. The Navy’s SEALs have exactly the opposite problem—they’re overwhelmingly white, with hardly any blacks. So they’re trying to do something about it.

It’s a fundamental challenge in a democracy with an all-volunteer force: recruits may be drawn from all segments of society, but elite military units—and none is more elite these days than the SEALs, following their dispatch of Osama bin Laden last May—tend to draw from small pools of talent. For the SEALs, that includes athletic young men who are smart and good in the water. For whatever reason, that has led to an overwhelmingly white SEAL force.

Say the SEALs:

Gaps exist in minority representation in both officer and enlisted ranks for Special Warfare operators. Diverse officers represent only ten percent of the officer pool (for example, African Americans represent less than 2% of SEAL officers). Diverse enlisted SEALs account for less than twenty percent of the total SEAL enlisted population. Naval Special Warfare is committed to fielding a force that represents the demographics of the nation it serves. This contract initiative seeks effective strategies to introduce high potential candidates from diverse backgrounds to the opportunities available in Naval Special Warfare.

The SEALs are considering hiring help to attract thousands of “minority males in the 16—24 year-old target age range” to become SEALs. “This contract will create a mechanism to enhance Naval Special Warfare’s ability to conduct outreach, raise awareness, mentor, and increase self-selection to a career as a SEAL within minority communities,” a recently-posted draft contract solicitation says.

The Navy isn’t seeking only black SEALs: “Challenges for minority recruitment also exist in the Hispanic, Asian Pacific Islander (API), Native American, and Arab American populations among others,” the announcement notes. “Given shifting demographics, these gaps in representation need to be corrected to ensure continued access. There are sustainment, societal, educational, and operational drawbacks to failing to correct this disparity.”

{snip}

On the cover of the latest issue of Newsweek are 10 SEALs. All of them appear to be Caucasian. That’s the reality.

But when you go to the SEALs’ recruiting website, there are only two SEALs. Both of them appear to be African-American. That’s the desire.

{snip}

The SEALs are seeking a contractor to generate SEAL-related contacts with at least “a thousand (1000) minority males aged 16-24 per metropolitan region” over a 12-month period. {snip}

{snip}

The Contractor will be required to develop and sustain an appropriate level of mentorship for HPCs identified during the specific events and regional campaigns conducted under this contract . . . Since the waterborne feature of SEAL training is often the most formidable obstacle for many prospective candidates, especially among minorities with little swimming experience, the swim training program is usually the most challenging of the mentoring components and the largest.

* I would like to see more white players in the NFL and the NBA. I would like to see NASCAR stop kowtowing to blacks. I would like to see an end to “Black Run America” (BRA). The list goes on but I’m sure you see my point.
The SEAL’s are an elite fighting force, a lot of good people try and fail and there is no shame in that. When your life depends on the man next to you; there is no room for affirmative action types.

* I can speak from direct experience in regards to the importance of being able to trust your fellow Marine, Soldier, etc. As a former member of a elite fighting unit I witnessed numerous unqualified, incompetent Africans being pushed through various training regimens. Failure was the norm. The fact of the matter is, a significant portion of the black population in the USA is dysfunctional. No amount of swimming lessons will change that.

The portion of the Black males that are not completely lost have easier avenues to pursue a better life. For a black male, simply going through the motions will enhance their career prospects as a civilian. Whereas a European American male (who lacks connections) has to go above and beyond to find success. A Euro American man has to to be twice as good as a white woman or Black guy to obtain a equal level of respect.

Therefore, the only way they will be able to see a significant rise in African male participation in the Special forces is to lower the standards. In fact I would say the standards would have to be lowered so much as to disqualify said unit from even being special forces any longer.

Anyhow, on a sidenote, from a personal point of view. There is not much left for the European American male to defend. We are discriminated against legally through Affirmative action legislation . We are demonized in Academia for Being European and male. We are portrayed as sick, weak, feeble minded, criminals by the news and entertainment industry in the United States. No my Euro American brothers, the nation of the United States deserves nothing from us as men. Not our love, not our labor, and most definitely not our loyalty. I am 360 degrees against any able bodied, physically and mentally healthy European American male from serving the United States of America in any capacity. The time we consider ourselves “American” before we consider ourselves European must end. We should consider ourselves Euro first, and American a distant second. (If at all).

* That is the way it was in the ARMY at Fort Benning. Blacks got a free ride to higher rank. The free ride convinced them they had the ability to lead men into battle. If they made a mistake, it was never their fault. They looked for any white person to blame.

I was a Life Guard at Fort Benning for the Rangers. There were very few black Rangers because blacks could not swim: They sank. Navy Seals are not suppose to sink. I wonder how they are going to solve that problem.

* The Navy is on board with race-replacing the Native Born White American Majority. When Native Born White Americans become a racial minority, they will be surrounded by a rapidly expanding and heavily armed nonwhite majority. If the “US” Navy has its way, the “US” Navy would be majority Iranian,Iraqi and Afghani…the three nations currently under assault by the US”. ” Military. It really seems as though the goal of “US” foreign policy is to reduce the Native Born White American Christian Majority to a rapidly dwindling racial minority within the borders of “America”. “US” foreign policy goes hand-in hand with “US” immigration policy…that the Native Born White American Majority ends up being race-replaced in the end only goes to demonstrate the noble and benign intentions of the utterly treasonous “US” Military…treason is the reason folks.

9/11 would never have occured if the 1965 Immigration Reform Act had not been passed…and if there had been a National Origins Immigration Policy in place that completely excluded muslims…that is to say, no muslims in America…Kolmogorov’s 0-1 law kicks in…and no 9/11..probability 0 event. 9/11 was carried out by young muslim men who migrated to America..some of them were actually living in Florida legally where they established an “American” Muslim geneline…can you believe it..muslim terrorists living and breeding in drought stricken Florida. Not only that, a legal immigrant Muslim was allowed to become a Major in the “US” Army where he went on to slaughter Native Born White American Youth at Fort Hood in Texas getting ready to deploy to Iraq …and then there was the Pakistani “American” hedge fund manager-established a Pakistani “American” geneline on “US” soil-who attempted to blow-up Time Square. And Now the “US” Navy wants to flood the Navy SEALS with young Muslim Males?

Cut the “US” Military budget by 90 percent..it has become the mortal enemy of the Native Born White American Majority.

The whole point of having borders and a Military to protect these borders is so that a demographic group can have its destiny and fate in its own hands rather than having its destiny and fate in the hands of a hostile foreign demographic group…this is borders 101. Now the “US” Military wants to wipe away America’s borders with the intent of having the current Native Born White American Majority’s fate and destiny in the hands of hostile,heavily armed, and high fertility muslim foreigners. The Social Contract has been thrown into fire and destroyed. The “US” Military has no legitimacy anymore. By the way,how is it going to work with muslim marines and homosexual marines?

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Why The Lack Of Diversity In America’s Special Forces?

Do White Lives Matter?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I am sensing about many middle class Americans beginning to wake up to the fact that the Democratic Party is beholden to an important part of its base which does not believe that “white lives matter.” I don’t know what I found more appalling, the former liberal governor of Maryland, Martin O’Malley, declaring before that meeting of black activists that “all lives matter and getting hissed by the audience or O’Malley debasing himself before that audience and apologizing for his perfectly sane and sensible remark. Add that to the riots in Ferguson, Mo. and Baltimore, Maryland, which I sense did not play very well to a great majority of non-black Americans, and you have the potential making of a Presidential election that may surprise most of the MSM. So there are a number of factors which give rise to the feeling that it may be 1968 redux. I don’t think that Hillary Clinton, should she be the Democratic nominee, has the political skills to ride that unruly horse. That all assumes the Republicans put up a candidate that can take full advantage of the situation.

* The moderators were obviously out to get Trump, which reveals not only their connections to the RNC, but their stupidity. Most conservative voters have problems with the RNC on immigration, and the FOX crew’s unanimous contempt for Trump sort of made it look like a RNC sponsored hatchet job. How exactly does this endear the Republican party to the disgruntled conservative voter?

The thing is, they didn’t need to do this. Trump isn’t the best candidate, and time will bear this out. I wouldn’t vote for him, but he currently has more of my respect and attention than the other candidates because of his bravery on immigration. Some of the other candidates – like Cruz and (surprisingly) Kasich – recognized the value in not alienating Trump or his supporters. The Jeb Bush variety candidates don’t get it, though. But they’re playing a game of gambling away the support of the staunch anti-immigration voter in hopes of picking up the (relatively) more liberal voter in the final showdown with the Democrats. I don’t believe that strategy will work.

Cruz came off the best, but he’ll have to polish up his VISA immigration policy before he’ll get my vote. After Trump is gone, they’ll go after him.

* My father, who was a surgeon, told me that Dermatology was the best specialty because your patients never die and they never get better.

On the other hand, some doctors might want to do something more challenging than prescribing ointments.

* Optho these days is a feast or famine specialty. Young docs fresh out of residency often struggle to make 200k especially if in popular, major cities. On the other hand, you have older, established guys pulling in 10m+.

Radiology’s best days are over. The field is saturated and starting salaries are in the 200-300k levels, less for academics and desirable locations.

Dentists can make a lot of money because they bill patients directly and don’t have to deal with shit insurance, let alone the federal government. A dentist (rather, oral surgeon) will make you pay 5k for an implant and you can take it or leave it. Cash only, please. A general surgeon on the other hand has to rely on third party payors. Maybe the patient can afford to pay a $500 surgeon’s fee out of pocket, but the average surgery costs 10k+ with the actual surgeon getting the smallest fraction of that bill, so every surgery goes through insurance unless it’s a completely elective procedure such as a gastric bypass. The surgeon will bill insurance $1500 for his services but since it’s man vs monopoly, he’ll be lucky to get $300 if he even gets reimbursed at all. Which is a complete joke, since a dentist gets $1000 for a root canal while even the most routine of surgeries can easily end with a debilitating complication or a dead body on the operating table, and all that responsibility and liability rests on the surgeon’s shoulders for a measly $300 (which includes 90 days of follow up care lmao).

Ortho will get its cuts soon too. Dermatology may be the only specialty that’s safe from Fed/Insurance monopoly ramming, since the payment model is similar to dentistry. It has lucrative, cash only outpatient procedures where all the $$$ goes directly to the physician rather than the Hospital or insurance company CEO.

* What I found strange is that Chris Wallace considered the most important question to be whether Donald could prove that the Mexican government is literally sending us its worst people. It was an example of a journalist playing “gotcha” on a tangential point that’s not really important.

The fact is, we’re getting Mexico’s wretched refuse and the Mexican government is encouraging it. Isn’t that apparent to everyone?

* At some point, Trump should have said, “I reject the notion that Jeb is here due solely to his family name. He’s an accomplished politician in his own right, and I respect the job that he did as governor of Florida. The fact is, here in America, success is earned the hard way; no one gets to rise to prominence based only on the accomplishments of their fathers, right Chris?…Right?…”

* Trump made all the professional politicians on the podium (and not on it as well) look small, weak, fake. Like people who are in the pockets of billionaires…like himself.

What’s interesting is how so many women are passionately taking his side and turning against his debate inquisitor Megyn Kelley:

https://www.facebook.com/MegynKelly

And look at how he insulted anointed war “hero” and previous Republican candidate for President, McCain, and got away with crossing that red line. He is taking on the GOP establishment and rolling over them. Trump holds all the cards. Including the trump card: the threat, or “leverage”, of going third party.

* Did Megyn Kelly accuse Trump of word raping women?

* I am surprised that no Republican candidate has the brains and foresight to knock that “blacklivesmatter” out of the ball park. When former governor Martin O’Malley addressed that group out in Arizona and sensibly said “all lives matter,” he got hissed off the stage and was forced to come back and grovel before that audience and apologize for “misspeaking.” As I recall, blacks comprise about 12-13% of America’s population. That means 87-88% are not black. To argue that lives of the overwhelming majority of America’s population “don’t matter” is a losing issue in my opinion. “All lives matter” is a totally sane and defensible position, and I don’t think anyone other than a demented black could possibly take issue with that color-blind stance. Standing up for “all lives matter” would also have the distinct advantage of tossing a grenade in the direction of Hillary Clinton. It would be interesting to see how she handles that explosive device without blowing up her own coalition.

Posted in Politics | Comments Off on Do White Lives Matter?

Blacks Behave Badly, Whites Blamed

Steve Sailer writes:

As the Surveillance Society evolves, crime ever increasingly Does Not Pay. A side effect of this could be that an increasing proportion of criminals that the police must deal with are even less rational than in the past.

For example, this video of a college football player driving up to a Texas car dealership in the middle of the night in a perfectly okay looking car, then trying to punch his way through a car’s side window, then breaking a windshield by jumping on it, then driving his car through the gate and, apparently, through the plate glass window of the showroom, where he was killed, apparently during a struggle with the cops who tried to arrest him.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* He was shit hammered drunk. He almost falls flat on his face at 4:16.

* Michael Brown, Freddie Gray, Sandra Bland and now Christian Taylor. Funny how these cases of blacks in trouble with the law have white-sounding names, despite the stereotype about poor black women’s dumb baby-naming tendencies. Even Trayvon Martin has an uncommon but German-derived first name.

* Salon gave us all the necessary info: “police kill unarmed black football player”.

Do we really need to know more?

* From the article:

“Clyde Fuller, Mr. Taylor’s great-uncle, told The Fort Worth Star-Telegram that Mr. Taylor was ‘a good kid’ and that he did not believe the police account that Mr. Taylor had been committing a crime.

‘I don’t see him stealing no car or nothing like that,’ Mr. Fuller said. ‘They say he’s burglarizing the place by running up in there? Nuh-uh. Something doesn’t sound right.’”

I understand not wanting to speak ill of one’s dead relatives. But has it now become standard journalistic practice to avoid asking such questions as “So what is your theory as to why he was inside a car dealership in the middle of the night when he got killed?”

If it has, why put quotes like those in there at all? Do they just do it to make the relatives look stupid? Are the New York Times writers actually smarter than they act, and are just mocking these people? Or are there actually reporters out there who still believe guys like Clyde Fuller?

* This chocolate-colored yutz was obviously on some fierce drugs. Also suffering Chronic Acute Permanent Victim Syndrome, he just couldn’t stand the pain anymore. The special medication of his beautiful SUV and all the adoring glances of the lily white cheerleaders just couldn’t cure him.
After taking a dump in the vandalized sports car, he gives in to despair and terminal stupidity and tragically ends his precious life.
Too bad we have to have another lynching of the police officers to expiate the sins of yet another terminally stupid negro.
Why don’t Black Lives Matter to the people who should value them the most-themselves?

* Technological developments are probably not going to solve the larger problem of the general public seemingly having hugely unrealistic expectations of law enforcement officers, based on a fantastical narrative that excuses criminal behavior or at least puts it in a sympathetic light. Even pepper spray has been vilified by some criminal sympathizers, though it is hard to find a more benign method of subduing a violent suspect.

The truth is that when cops fail to use enough force, quickly enough, it often results in them having to use more force later on in the encounter. It may seem hard for many sheltered people to believe, but I think many cops these days are guilty of not using enough force early in the confrontation to quash violent attack. When naive citizens watch videos of cops “acting like assholes”, what they fail to realize is that could very well prevent the situation from escalating further. It may not be nice but that is the reality of physical confrontation.

When an untrained, inexperienced and often gullible outside observer sees a video, they frequently don’t understand what they are seeing. What they might be shown is a poor, hapless minority receiving a drubbing. Much wailing and gnashing of teeth ensues and the police learn very quickly is that the public apparently wants criminals to be apprehended in a manner befitting the most pleasant and unrealistic fantasies of the liberal criminal apologist. In other words: leave them alone, they dindu nuffin. Crime goes up. Liberals scratch their heads and wonder how this could happen.

Sheltered people have been conditioned to believe that violent savages should be treated with kid gloves. Of course, criminal sympathizers and abettors also feel the same way. And here we are.

None of my comments should be interpreted as an excuse for illegal behavior on the part of police. Certainly, there are some things about police hiring, training and policy that could be improved. However, I do find that many, if not most, of the people critiquing police really haven’t the first clue about the reality of violent confrontations.

* I think it was Richard Lynn who said that IQ can be thought of not so much as dumb/smart but rather can better be understood in terms of age. Someone with an IQ of 75 is more equivalent to a nine-year-old. He can learn to operate an AK-47 but does not necessarily have the judgment not to point it his friends.

* In the leftist view a black man is perfectly justified in assaulting a white man (especially a white police officer) if he feels he’s been disrespected, since the black male’s victimological ranking is high and the white man’s is low. And most crimes (robbery, drug dealing) are forgivable if committed by a black man, for basically the same reason. But to rape a woman, or even to be accused of it? Better to walk into a random Presbyterian church and open fire on the congregation, so long as you can concoct some story about how they were “racist” against you. Note also how the left loves to work in secondary pet causes with each of these stories: gun control (Trayvon Martin), lead paint in housing projects (Freddie Gray). Walter Scott seemed to vanish from public discourse pretty quickly when it got around that the “crime” he was most likely running from was…failure to pay child support. A black man is still a man, and thus not entirely without sin.

* A couple of unthinkable alternatives to “bear darts”:

1. End all forms of taxpayer support to single/unwed mothers. Let the churches, synagogues, doogooder.orgs and the single mothers themselves work it out together.

2. Put a halt to the college athletics scholarship NFL/NBA feeder racket. Jock-sniffs will howl, wail and withhold their $upport. And the beleaguered taxpayer will no longer be compelled to subsidize jock-sniff escapism or V.I.P. treatment for select thugs.

* How was Wilson to throw Michael Brown to the ground when Brown reached into his car to beat on him and get Wilson’s gun? How was Wilson to throw a charging, almost 300 lbs guy to the ground.

Did you fail to think this through?

* Another innocent black life lost. Bring the reparations now!

The guy was obviously high out of his mind (not drunk because he kept good balance jumping on a windshield). After seeing the video, it’s fun to see Huff Post describe it as “The video shows Taylor wandering around the lot and peering into cars”. LOL, perhaps for a lesson the writer needs someone to peer on his car like this.

* “In August 2014, he posted on Twitter, “I don’t feel protected by the police.” In December 2014, he wrote, “Police taking black lives as easy as flippin a coin, with no consequences.” Last April, he wrote, “I don’t wanna die too young.”

Well, he made it to August.

* The National Institute of Justice poured large amounts of cash into funding many different engineering, research, and evaluation programs aimed at developing and testing many different ideas for non-lethal police restraints. Among the ideas developed and tested were goo that hardened into rubbery ropes, nets shot from a distance, beanbags (killed a white girl during a baseball riot in Boston), rubber bullets, shotgun spray pellets, incapacitating gases, sedative darts, long-distance taser weapons, super slippery materials, flash-bangs, microwave radiation projectors. These are the ones I remember off the top of my head. There many others. This happened back in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Nothing ever really panned out. In practice the devices were too bulky or hard to use in field conditions, did not perform adequately, or turned out to have high lethality associated with them. It’s not like police haven’t been searching for the magic non-lethal bullet that those not familiar with police work think they are hiding from the public. It’s that no one has yet found an effective, non-lethal incapacitation and restraint system that police can carry with them and easily use.

* I expect a gene-specific water- or food-borne agent that will drastically reduce fertility.

Permanent genetic effect or (preferably) transmitted epigenetically. Nobody is hurt. Nobody figures it out for 20+ years. Turbo-CRISPR, so to speak.

The initial research could even be public and progressive-sounding: a new way to reduce tsetse or medflies or the feral dog/cat population.

* Given that a third of all black people have IQs that put them into the range of retardation (as, clearly, do most of the perps in these panic-flight shooting incidents), the real question is: What the f— are we going to do with 30 million black retards? Any answers. Genocide? Hardly. Shipment back to Africa? That boat done left. Assignment to labor camps? Unlikely. I know: let’s bribe them to be good, even if they’re not smart enough to understand the bargain, let’s have a whole political culture tell them they’re victims and should therefore be exempt from laws, let’s put them on a dole derived from the taxation of responsible citizens, let’s redefine all protocols for dealing with them rationally, accepting the idea that it’s best to let them rampage until their flawed brains lose interest, and let’s subsidize them to breed more. Yeah, yeah, that’s a good idea.

* I agree that it’s the fault of the SJW’s and the endless march towards equality, you see the same thing in the Army.

What’s funny is that discouraging physical violence in order to curtail police brutality may have cost more lives than the old ‘wooden shampoo’ approach could ever have managed. Taking away the cops ability to become physical only increases the chances they’d have to shoot any violent aggressor. I wonder if the crime-prone community misses the old breed of brawler-cop?

I’d much rather be Rodney King than Michael Brown, given the choice.

* Any chance this rent a mob is working for our old friend George Soros? I hear the nation wrecker who likes to destroy currencies for fun and profit is bankrolling the black intifada. Guess he has to do something between crashing economies. Funny he would sic his mob on old Bernie though. Is he ready for Hillary? Is Hillary ready for Hillary? Somebody better take Dorian Gray into the shop and get Dr. Frankenstein to do some work. She looks like she’s falling apart like a cheap suit. I would have thought she would get a Madonna style bodysculpt to take ten or more years off of her. With the cigar store Indian sitting out the race those crazy Gynosupremacists aren’t gonna be happy if a womyn doesn’t ride the horse this time. Maybe Crazy Joe Biden can wear a dress? He crazy – he’d do it for the good of the party I’m sure. Get him some estrogen cornflakes.

* The woman demanding the four and a half minute moment of silence for Mike Brown in the second video reminds me of Sasha Baron Cohen as Borat demanding everyone at the minor league baseball park stand for the Kazakstan National Anthem, with one difference: Baron Cohen starts out ingratiating, and then shifts to being obnoxious; these women go from obnoxious to more obnoxious. Satire can’t keep up.

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off on Blacks Behave Badly, Whites Blamed

Freddie Gray’s “Crash for Cash” Habit?

Baltimore Sun:

Officers’ attorneys say Freddie Gray had history of ‘crash for cash’ schemes.

The police detectives who investigated the death of Freddie Gray were told that he had a history of participating in “crash-for-cash” schemes — injuring himself in law enforcement settings to collect settlements — but were advised by a state prosecutor not to pursue the information, according to defense attorneys for the six officers charged in Gray’s arrest and death.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* It is a measure of the astonishing political power of the Soros crowd that they can offer up people with really lousy personal histories, caught in shocking behavior, and get them lauded as complete victims.

Like the Chinese emperors of old; they bring a deer to court and get everyone to admit that it is a horse.

* The main thing is to keep the water boiling. As soon as one case loses steam another one is found, never mind the actual merits. By the time one case has been rationally explained it’s already in the memory hole.

* Mosby’s travesty of a case will be thrown out just as all the other meritless accusations have been in the matters Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, etc. The caterwauling of the black grievance industry in these affairs is never about ‘justice’ or ‘Black Lives Matter’ , it is about extortion via the inevitable civil lawsuit that is filed seeking compensation for the death of the black lout.

The play is well rehearsed, often with the same actors. The folks at the Conservative Treehouse have documented the methodology and even the behind the scenes choreographers. A media specialist like Ryan Julison is retained by the black law firm ( Parks and Crump) to arrange media coverage of the shooting on behalf of their ‘client’, the family of the dead black lout. “Eyewitnesses’ are created and given legal counsel to provide false accounts of the event to the news media. They have now even learned to quickly scrub the social media of the ‘victim’, his family and their fake ‘eyewitnesses’ to prevent media or conservative crowd sourced scrutiny of the ‘actors’. The entire black political establishment is deployed to express outrage and the DoJ Community Relations Service deployed to monitor the police investigation and help choreograph protests in preparation to impose a Federal consent decree upon law enforcement.

Its all a big scheme being run out of the White House now to poison race relations in an effort to energize the black vote in local and off year elections.

* Why would anyone want to be an officer in the Armed Forces of the United States of America today?

In the first place, a career in the armed services requires frequent moving, and frequent deployments. That’s not conducive to strong families or tranquil home life.

In the second place, since the armed services have been re-made to conform to regnant social values, you would have to deal with all kinds of nonsense related to women’s issues, LGBT issues, and — any day now — Trans issues. Count me out.

The way you attract higher quality people to the armed services is by having high social esteem for the armed services. This is something that was understood in many European cultures, and in recent times by Imperial Germany (because all of the Nazi officers got their start there) and by Israel. Aside from the obligatory “thank you for your service” nonsense we get in the US, service in the Armed Forces hasn’t been esteemed in the US for 50 years.

I enlisted in the Marines in the early 70′s and served 4 years and got something out of it. Plus I got the GI Bill for college. But would I enlist today as I did then? No.

* This is just sick. It reminds of a story I read in Amren a while back about the usual suspects crippling and maiming their children because it drew more money out from western white fools.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Freddie Gray’s “Crash for Cash” Habit?

The Funniest Place Online

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* The only place in the media I find truly funny anymore is the comments section for the featured videos at Liveleak. It’s thoroughly macabre and nasty over there, and it’s a relief to have it. I can’t imagine the hassle of being a professional comedian these days.

Maybe we’re just slowly entering a neo-Victorian era. It happened after the British got tired of the crude excess of the Georges, and they were happy to be able to get back to delicacy and start dressing up table legs. As someone who lived through the punk era, I absolutely do not understand these neo-Victorians at all. Even their music is wimpy. It’s as if they’re mortally afraid to rock.

I think we have too many people who are the children of divorced parents, and these people have used up their last nerve just trying to make it to adulthood without psychological breakdown. None of them seem to have any internal psychological resources for dealing with their problems.

Posted in Comedy | Comments Off on The Funniest Place Online

Europe’s African Disaster

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Africans will only come to Europe if Europeans can provide jobs for them to do. Otherwise they may as well stay in Africa and work for Asians.

And thats why the worm is about to turn on immigration – we no longer have labour intensive industries in which to employ low-skilled immigrants, and without these industries big business can’t make money out of low IQ immigrants.

Population aging in itself isn’t a primary factor in immigration, it’s wealth and job opportunities – Polands population is aging faster than Sweden’s but you don’t see Africans pooring into Poland since Poland can’t provide them with jobs. Greece only has an immigration problem because it’s a doormat for immigrants trying to get into north Europe.

Posted in Africa, Europe, Immigration | Comments Off on Europe’s African Disaster

Angry Blacks Disrupt Bernie Sanders

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* God, it must be fun to go around breaking up people’s rallies and seizing the stage with impunity. Somehow I don’t think I’d get away with it–I don’t have standing.

* They remind me physically and verbally of Rosie O’Donnell. Wish Trump had been there to say, “Shut up you slobs—by the way. Lay off the Cheetos. You’re pretty damned young to be so hefty.”
That would have done my heart good.

* The funny thing is that Sanders is a race baiting demagogue himself, he just cannot use the same tactics on blacks that he uses on whites. This is probably the first time in his life he is getting a taste of what he has been giving and he does not seem to be handling it well.

* I don’t know if I have seen such self pity, such a sense of entitlement, such pushy (literally) behavior ever, excluding the conduct of three year olds. I mean the way the one black chick starts crying when she says, “I had to fight through all of this just to say that my life matters!” And the way the other black chick was screaming at the event organizer, pushing him, and almost hitting him, to yield the microphone. I had no idea it was that chaotic and frankly violent.

The word for this is: Indulgence. We are indulgent of this kind of foolishness, and these two gals, who might even be former members of a debate team, are used to getting their way, no matter how absurd and out of place their actions are.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Donald Trump would have told them to pound sand and laughed. His refusal to back down to Megan Kelly took more balls than 99% of men can muster. The rest of the GOP field would have wilted and then started mumbling about how much they were against breast cancer or some other groveling gesture.

* I’ll wager that Black Lives Matter is just a minor flare-up, and that an increase in inner-city crime rates due to kinder, gentler policing (already seemingly underway) will make whites that much less sympathetic to it. Blacks are generally too disorganized to effect major political change; they’ll be bribed, brainwashed and outmaneuvered as necessary. Asians have a lot of resentment of whites too, as well as tendency towards passivity, but their values are basically white values and they’ll mobilize if their own interests are severely threatened (e.g., the push to end race-neutral admissions in California). The Democratic leadership understand that hypocrisy is an effective political strategy: just pretend to care about ghetto blacks and you can get away with anything.

* You haven’t lived until your restaurant meal has been interrupted by a crew of these self-centered attention whores, marching around the dining room, banging on pots and plates. “It’s all about us,” they wail. “Black Black Blackety Black!” they insist.

Any place they are permitted to go, they will practice their ‘performance art’. As hinted above, one rational response is to completely cease law-enforcement activities in black ‘hoods, since it grates so severely on dey style. I like where this is headed.

* You really have to listen to the second video starting at about 2:15 to get a sense of the crowd dynamic here.

At about this time, the black woman speaker says the wants to honor the fact that she had to fight to get through a bunch of “screaming white faces” to say that her life matters.

At this, people in the audience go into an outrage. A man starts yelling for her to “Get off! Get off!” and “How dare you! How dare you!” A woman in the audience (perhaps more than one) says, indignantly, “She called me racist! She said I’m a racist!”

It’s pretty amazing. No doubt these are people who imagine themselves the most anti-racist whites in existence, and have called everybody a hair to the right of themselves racists, and just can’t stomach the idea that someone would presume to say that THEY are racists. It just doesn’t matter if it’s the very group of blacks, and black cause, that yesterday they would have supported; they have been wounded mortally by the accusation, right in the heart of their moral superiority, and must lash out.

It’s quite a sight to behold. Frankenstein faces his monster.

* You might be a cuckservative if you compare the action on the right to these disruptions during Bernie Sander’s campaign events.

First, as discussed in length on this blog, Black Live Matter is a campaign based on fraudulent assumptions that is backed at length by POTUS, the US AG, often the courts, universities, and much of the mainstream media. The later take great pains to inflate and often distort the instances where police have killed blacks in the course of arrests. The tactics employed by these activists are entirely based on threat, confrontation, humiliation, and dominance.

Cuckservative is entirely occurring in social media and in blogs. It accepts the idea that politics is downstream from culture and it attempts to push the Overton Window to allow the discussion of what its proponents believe are verifiable truths. This Sailer blog is dedicated to those truths. The use of studies, graphs, data, works by experts is unparalleled among blogs. And it is one of many that attempt to arrive at conclusions using the same methods.

Yet to discuss these truths, and mind you the holders of these opinions are not idiots, we are often shouted down by cowardly accusations of Racist, Sexist, Misogynist, Homophobe, and the particularly stupid Transphobe. We have no support in any mainstream media. And the office holders of the GOP refuse to even mention these items on the campaign trail. They and the Republican media, along with Republican NGOs and think tanks have stood by, cowardly and allowed the church, as well as great conservative institutions and private individuals to be destroyed. And they have been ineffective in both governance and any defense of conservatism in the United States, as well as Europe.

So as the NKVD set up machine guns behind Russian troops during assaults in WWII, we too have set up behind those Republican party officials and media to remind them that we will no longer be quiet, no longer be bludgeoned not only by the left, but also by our own party into accepting positions that we feel are truly detrimental to liberty in this country, to the liveability of this country, effective governance of this country, to a tyranny based on lies.

Sailer has often hinted that a broad base of readers come to his blog, including many writers and probably elected officials. These truths are here for consumption, yet those same writers, even when exposed to this discussion by an exceptional writer and a rather august, broad based, highy intelligent set of readers and commenters, ignore these issues, and shout down discussion with epithets that worked up until now.

So we resort to more effective “meme”, a slur, delivered in an aggressive and confrontational manner, in the media, on social networks, and where years of discussion, where gigabytes of writing have failed, this tactic, coupled with the response given to by over 40% of the Republican base, a broad group that has been abandoned by the monied interest and the Republican political class, has done in a short time what prior methods failed to achieve.

Make no mistake. For many of us, if our ideas are not adopted, we do not care if Clinton wins, and if she imposes a nightmare of Democratic policies for 8 years. For many of us, this country and the tyranny it imposes on the people that built it, its best citizens, means little to us in its current form. Better Clinton kill it so we may end it and start anew in another form based on true liberty, true justice, and true freedom for all.

We do not care if “We make the black kids mad, or the fags, or the trannies, or feminists.” We will not quietly sit in our cuck chair in the corner any longer. If that is like Black Lives Matter then too damn bad.

White Lives Matter More. At least to me.

* A close reading of Mein Kampf shows it to be about controlling the megaphone during meetings of the nascent National Socialist Party versus the disruption caused by Communists in attendance (references to Jews are sparse and not central to the book which was about his “struggle” to power). Hitler and his followers knew better than to give away the mike to their adversaries. Specially trained ex-soldiers were present whose job it was to remove those who tried to disrupt the speeches.

This may be unpleasant for those here to read, but Hitler understood that control of the streets and microphone was central to power and he recognized that violent removal of those who sought to silence you was not only justifiable by necessary. He deplored the hand wringing appeasers who shirked from using force when dealing with a forceful opponent.

* Back when the Democrats actually represented the interests of working class people (pre-Clinton), there were a lot of tough union hardhat types. Such men don’t really identify much with the left-wing of the Democratic party. They’re disaffected by the Democratic worship of corporatists and Wall Streeters. They’re also turned off by all the straight white American male bashing.

These days, a lot of the hardhats have left politics or vote Republican. The masculine hardhat Democrats are either gone or aging remnants from the pre-1990s era. There are plenty who might vote Democratic, but they tend to stay away from these types of events.

Looking at the Sanders crowd on various new sites, I noticed how effeminate the progressive men appear. There’s a definite testosterone deficiency in the modern day Democratic party, except among blacks. These days, the Democratic base are an interesting coalition of feminists, immigrants, effete white guys, gays, and blacks.

In places like Seattle, the cops tend to be particularly harsh and brutal. They keep the order. The progressive white men hide behind them. It’s easy being a progressive when you got a 200-lb well-armed muscle head watching your back. Seattle pays its cops very well and attracts lots of warrior-cop types.

Progressive men in places like NYC and Seattle outsource their masculinity to raging bull (mostly white) cops. The model works well, allowing the progressives to maintain their wimpiness and stay safe.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Angry Blacks Disrupt Bernie Sanders

I just wish my conversion to Judaism went as smoothly as upgrading to Windows 10

* I upgraded to Windows 10 Thursday night. It took 80 minutes. After that, there have been few hassles.

* Acquaintance: “Why did you convert to Judaism?”
Luke: “I read Portnoy’s Complaint.”

* That was a fun debate. Let’s do it again, with even hotter blonde journalists!

I want that Colombian chick asking questions, the one who stars on that homo tv show about a homo family and who has those huge midos.

* How does the goy think he will stop being cucked if he can’t even turn off the sports to watch the Republican debate? All the bars are showing sports tonight. Why would these republican whores do what you want when you can’t even watch them a little bit?
The WNs don’t rebuke their brothers about this.

If Jews behaved like this, we would let them have it.

We have to explain everything to the WN goy. Everything!

* “Eighty percent of IQ is genetic and since brain power is very taxing in calories, it was adaptive for certain people to have less of it.” (James Tyhurst)

cropped

* My memo to America: Stop wanking and start an open dialogue about race.

Talking about race is a great palliative for sex addiction. You get to release your yayas and say things that would get you arrested in many countries.

* My bosses and parents over the years have repeatedly noted that I tend to put out the least effort possible. Hey, I’ve been saving myself for Facebook!

* Friend on FB: “How’s life treating you?”
Luke: “ok”
Friend: “TMI”

* Friend: “Did you meet anyone last night at your meeting?”
Luke: “No, but I got a lot of spiritual growth.”
Friend: “So you were hard all evening.”

* Friend: “He got hurt in an accident and he made no big deal about it.”
Luke: “Is he Jewish?”
Friend: “No.”

* It can be painful to be loved so much.

* If you want to figure out why you are doing something, stop doing it and it will become clear.

* Fear fades with action, prayer and repetition. (UA)

* Most addictions have a strong isolation quality. (UA)

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on I just wish my conversion to Judaism went as smoothly as upgrading to Windows 10

Intellectuals

11811519_1706679502888656_5552965039400768614_n

Posted in Comedy | Comments Off on Intellectuals