Different Diets Work Differently For Different People

Steve Sailer writes:

The existence of human biodiversity shouldn’t be such a startling new insight, but I guess it is.

It ought to be obvious by now that different people flourish or decay on different diets.

And yet we constantly read of nutrition studies that assume that their goal should be to find the best diet for everybody rather than to find diets that work better for some people.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Americans who relocate to Europe or Asia frequently lose weight – mostly from smaller portions and greatly increased walking. They generally regain the weight when they return to the U.S. where the portions are bigger and there is much more driving.

* English became very rigid physically. Stiff upper lip and all that stuff.

So, all that bottled up energy had to find outlet through wit.

Since Brits were supposed to be physically restrained, they had to suppress the more boisterous kind of humor, slapstick stuff. Instead, they had to sharpen their wits and go for shades of subtlety and nuance.

This was different from mere refinement as all cultures have the refined class.

It was the art of transgression dressed up as manners.
Outwardly polite and conservative but inwardly subversive and irreverent.

Few cultures can be so polite and deadly at the same time.

This is what is so unnerving about THE DAY OF THE JACKAL.

He never loses his cool on his path to calamity.
It’s like a ‘dry’ drink.

Maybe it also had to with English love of liberty/individuality and hierarchy/order.

How can one have both?

To have order/hierarchy, there must be lots of restraint.
But liberty/individuality needed some kind of outlet.
English found a way to maintain outward form while using wit to hint at all kinds of nastiness.

This is strange and odd to a lot of cultures. They understand order/manners and they understand freedom/confrontation. But they don’t have the fusion of the two found in English culture.

It’s like the Jappers could be refined but just don’t get the kind of razor sharp dual sensibility of the Brits.

In violence and poverty, Japanese did fuse refinement with cruelty or beauty with brutality. It’s like in that movie Gohatto.

But in verbal expression, there is nothing quite like the combination found among the English.

Jappers appreciate cherry blossoms and slashing people.

* Two peoples saw a cultural renaissance of artists in the 20th century, the Irish out of the Abbey theater and the Jews out of Hollywood. Funny to think the former was unmoored from Church tastes while the latter was under them explicitly. The Hollywood Renaissance maybe hasn’t ended, and the best young writer in the world is Ireland’s Colin Barrett. Interesting that being Irish in Ireland is not a debate, and being Jewish in America means you own the debate. As if owning this thing called heritage does wonders for this thing called art. Which is not wielded as a political advantage on the Island that owns itself because Yeats summoned Cuchulain to Pearse’s side at a post office.

* Americans might also lose weight if they were to develop adult palates, and learn to spurn brown sugar water and sugar-laden foods. One can rationally believe this without joining the “sugar is the spawn of the devil” zealots.

* Some people do well with carbs, some do well with fat. All do well with high protein, because of the thermogenic loss, role in maintaining muscle and building muscle, and satiety that protein engenders.

Posted in America, England, Health, Japan | Comments Off on Different Diets Work Differently For Different People

The Religion Of Peace

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Terrorism tally in the West for one week:

1) The murder of 14 Americans in San Bernardino.
2) Muslim man stabs 3 people in London, screaming “This is for Syria!”
3) Jordanian immigrant to the US tries to break into cockpit during a Lufthansa flight.

That ignores all the even deadlier slaughters taking place in the Third World. Quite a week for the religion of peace.

* The problem is that the FN seems to essentially be bounded at something like 30% support. This means the “moderate” Left and Right can keep on barring them from effective power indefinitely and it seems that even as great a shock as the Paris Attacks have made no cardinal difference.

To be sure their support grows stronger in the younger age groups but even in the 18-24 age bracket they are still co-equal with just the combined Leftists to say nothing of “Le métissage obligatoire” Right. And this poll was conducted after the Paris Attacks.

So in short, nothing to celebrate here…

* I’m thinking, where’s the other 69%? In Israel, Ariel Sharon went from being a fringe figure in the 90s, to winning 70% in the 2001 election, once the people had had enough of the second Intifada.

The French should either come to their senses, or vote to expunge the words “Qu’un sang impure abreuve nos sillons” from their national anthem.

* One wonders how popular they would be if they had the wind at their back. What if the media of France promoted the FN as something positive rather than toxic? It’s amazing and unfortunate how powerful the media still is in our nations. They literally still control the debate and get to determine what is and is not acceptable public discourse.

Posted in France, Islam | Comments Off on The Religion Of Peace

Israel’s Government and U.S. Democrats: Parallel Universes, Drifting Apart

Republicans are solidly with Israel, Democrats increasingly less so.

From Haaretz:

Remarks made by representatives of the Israeli right at the Saban Forum this week left their American listeners with feelings that ranged between frustration, shock and helplessness.

WASHINGTON – One thing that stood out during the three days of discussions at the Saban Forum were the stunned glances that the American participants, the vast majority of whom came from the Democratic side of the U.S. political map, exchanged with each other as they heard what representatives of the Israeli right had to say. Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon, Education Minister Naftali Bennett and Yisrael Beiteinu party chairman Avigdor Lieberman left their American listeners with feelings that ranged between frustration, shock and helplessness.
The lip service that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to pay to the two-state solution no longer makes any impression on almost anyone in Washington. Senior officials in the U.S. administration and the Democratic Party listened to the senior Israeli government officials from the Likud and Habayit Hayehudi parties and understood that their real policy, in the best case, is a one-and-a-half-state solution – one in which Israel controls most of the West Bank and the Palestinians have an autonomous zone comprised of several cantons.

Posted in Democrats, Israel | Comments Off on Israel’s Government and U.S. Democrats: Parallel Universes, Drifting Apart

Refugees in Israel Fear They Could All Be Targets of Next Lynch Mob

To survive as a civilization, you have to exclude others, otherwise you get swamped. Israel is making the tough decisions it has to to survive. Will America and Europe get real?

Israel does not need any more low-IQ non-Jews in its midst and America does not need any more low-IQ immigrants.

From Haaretz Oct. 22, 2015:

Fellow asylum seekers say Eritrean refugee shot and beaten by mob was killed by racism, not by mistake.

Israeli media and authorities say that Eritrean asylum seeker Habtom Zarhum died because he was mistaken for a Palestinian terrorist. His friends and fellow refugees don’t believe it: He was killed by racism, they say, fearing they could face the same fate at any moment.
“I have lived in Israel for seven years,” said Awet Asheber, a 35-year-old Sudanese. “I have never been mistaken for an Arab. We don’t look the same. Look at my skin color – it’s the same color as Habtom’s. We look African – not Arab!”
Zarhum, 29, was attacked and beaten on Sunday as he lay in a pool of blood on the floor of the Be’er Sheva Central Bus Station after being shot by a security guard who suspected he had carried out the terror attack that just took place there. While some tried to protect him, the mob repeatedly charged at him, kicking him in the head and throwing a bench at him.
Asheber, who was recently released from the Holot detention facility for asylum seekers, believes that the “lynch,” as the attack is referred to in Hebrew, merely provided the incensed crowd with an opportunity to vent their racism against Africans. “They beat him as if he were a snake. Israeli society has called us a cancer,” he said, referring to 2012 comments by then-MK and current Culture Minister Miri Regev. “They call us infiltrators and don’t realize that we are here because we have nowhere else to go. It was racism that killed Habtom, and it can kill any one of us,” Asheber said.
On Wednesday night, thousands of Africans, along with dozens of Israelis, crowded into Levinsky Park in south Tel Aviv for a memorial service for Zarhum. The event was organized by lay leaders in the Eritrean community, along with some logistical aid from Israeli NGO’s including the Hotline for Refugees and Migrants. Religious officials representing the Orthodox, Roman Catholic and Pentecostal denominations offered condolence prayers and encouraged the assembled to observe their faith. Most spoke in Tigrinya, one of Eritrea’s official languages. The crowd listened quietly, but the undercurrent of rage was palpable. Next to an unused bomb shelter that served as a stage, the organizers had hung a large sign, reading “The Barbaric Act of Beheading an Innocent Eritrean,” along with a picture of Zarhum, Israeli and Eritrean flags, and a cross.

Posted in Africa, Blacks, Immigration, Israel | Comments Off on Refugees in Israel Fear They Could All Be Targets of Next Lynch Mob

What Syria’s refugees think about Israel might surprise you

Jews and Muslims are antagonists. Why would you expect anything else?

Imagine looking at the world if your IQ was 83. You’d be suspicious and surly too and prone to conspiracy theories.

Do you think Europe and America and Australia and Canada are going to more or less friendly to the Jews as their Muslims populations increase?

From The Jerusalem Post:

BERLIN: Israel’s government is in cahoots with Syrian President Bashar Assad. America wants to keep the Syrian civil war going for as long as possible. Russia is outmaneuvering the United States on the global stage.

Those are some of the viewpoints you’re likely to hear if you talk politics with Syrians pouring out of their war-torn country and into Europe.

When I went to Berlin recently to write about the wave of migrants arriving in Germany, one of the questions I was most curious about was something that had nagged at me since the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad began bombing its own people back in 2011: Now that you see the true face of your government, do you look at its longtime adversary, Israel, any differently? Could the enemy of your enemy be your friend?

But when it came to their views on Israel, there seemed to be more conspiracy theory than political theory. And I was surprised (though I probably shouldn’t have been) that for many Syrians, the defining element of their identity is sectarian rather than national, and therefore they’re more concerned with the divides among Alawites, Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds than the divide between Arab and Jew…

To my Western ear, many of the Syrians’ convictions sounded outlandish, incoherent or ignorant.

COMMENTS AT JP:

* Where are all the “Muslims for Peace” rallies? Why aren’t they protesting all the acts of terrorism? Why aren’t they telling ISIS to leave the Christians and Jews alone? Why aren’t they saying, stop raping and killing children? Why?

* Good for them…. still trying to throw the responsibility for what happened to their country to anyone else but themselves. And of course Israel will be guilty of whatever.

* There are 7 billion souls on this planet.
It is unrealistic that Europe can actually take in endless waves of people.
It is puzzling to me why so many of Europe’s elite are willing to commit national suicide.

* Has anyone in Israel considered the implications for the future when Germany and France are under a Muslim majority?

* The cheap teaser in this article is, “What Syria’s refugees think about Israel might surprise you”

There’s of course nothing surprising about these eternally Jew-hating vermin accusing Israel of being in “cahoots,” with Assad, as it is the best way to vilify the Syrian president. It’s a tactic that’s been used by one Muslim group against another many, many times in the past; there is no greater smear than to suggest that a Muslim or Muslim nation is engaged in anything with Israel other than the Jewish nation’s destruction.

The two things that are surprising about the refuges is that (1) they’re completely correct in their contention that Russia is outmaneuvering the United States on the global stage and (2) that they have been welcomed into Western nations, where they will undoubtedly contribute expeditiously to the destruction of those Western nations.

* Muslims/arabs are never ever responsible for their fate, or their situation. It’s always always some other nation, religion, or government that intentionally deliberately caused their predicament.

* No one is still surprised by what Arabs/ Islamist think about Israel. Anything they deem bad is the fault of Israel. Only the ignorant of reality in the Middle East are surprised.

* Why not just put a gun in the hands of the young people in the migrant flood, return them to Syria, and tell them to fight for their homeland if they really value it? Arabs seem incapable of taking care of themselves. Those that have great wealth are reluctant to share it, those with massive territory refuse to take in a single refugee, those with large armies refuse to use them. Is this what an admirable culture looks like?

* This article should be taken as a warning for the Jewish people. The Syrian refugees will spread their anti-Semitic and ant-Israel garbage in every country that lets them in. Germany taking in 800,000 thousands is especially ominous.

* This article is a very good example of several things:
1) lack of education in the ME,
2) Western superiority — no, wrong word — arrogance,
3) although acknowledging that we are all ‘kids of Adam and Eve,” strongly indicating that you think that ‘your’ kids are superior, while your kids sit in heated rooms watching flat-screen TVs and ours just watched their parents or brothers shot by terrorists who just raped their mother and sold their sisters. Terrorists whom the US is supporting, training, and arming, and
4) no solution to the problem — only finger-pointing.

So tell me, with no solution, why do you think are you superior? Your president has not only enabled Daesh to grow (and presented a hefty, illogical bill to US taxpayers), but trained Daesh, AND even given them weapons. It seems that most al-Nusra (al-Qaeda) terrorists (same guys responsible for 9/11 – remember that?) get trained by the CIA, then turn over to Daesh, while the US lets Turkey into the anti-Daesh ‘war’ — only so the US can turn their backs while Turkey kills the Kurds.

* I don’t want refuges from the Middle East because their view of life is so much different than mine that they will change our way of life permanently.

* If the Germans are to survive, they had better exterminate those traitors in power at present and place a Putinesque type in power and start building the infrastructure for a hi-tech Final Solution Mk2 . This time get the RIGHT race

I live in hope that there is some fact behind this;” Israel is Developing ‘Ethnic Bomb’ for Growing Biological Weapons Arsenal” and the program is well under way.

Posted in Arabs, Immigration, Israel, Syria | Comments Off on What Syria’s refugees think about Israel might surprise you

NYC mayor urges Syrian Jews to empathize with refugees

Who wants to empathize with Americans?

I suspect that Syrian Jews in America don’t feel great ties to Syria. The country was never that wonderful to them.

REPORT: New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio in a Sabbath address to a Syrian Jewish synagogue called on congregants to empathize with Muslim refugees from their shared homeland.

The Shabbat worshipers at the Orthodox Congregation Shaare Zion in Brooklyn appeared to disapprove with the mayor’s address, the New York Post reported Sunday, noting that the congregants murmured uncomfortably as he compared Syrian refugees fleeing their country’s civil war with Jews fleeing the Nazis.

“I know this community understands deeply the pain of any family that must leave a homeland they love because they were forced away by violence and discrimination,” said de Blasio, calling on people to “look at history.”

Posted in Immigration, Jews, Syria | Comments Off on NYC mayor urges Syrian Jews to empathize with refugees

Refugees In Israel

From the African Refugee Development Center:

Israel is a reluctant host to 46,437 African asylum seekers predominantly from Eritrea (73%) and Sudan (19%) and a small minority (8%) arriving from several other African countries. The state policy toward asylum seekers (particularly Eritreans and Sudanese) is one of temporary non-deportation, officially referred to as “group protection.” Asylum seekers in Israel are denied basic rights and access to social services and the government of Israel has employed various policies to pressure asylum seekers to leave – including indefinite arbitrary detention, refusal to accept and review asylum claims, limitation of access to basic state-sponsored services, incitement and coerced repatriation. The Supreme Court of Israel has, in two distinct decisions, affirmed that the State’s treatment of African asylum seekers is unacceptable and violates fundamental laws concerning human dignity and liberty. The Court insisted on a comprehensive policy that seriously tackles this issue, but the government remains noncompliant.

Prevention of Infiltration Law

The Prevention of Infiltration Law was passed and implemented in the 1950s, to address Palestinian refugees who re-entered Israel after the establishment of the state of Israel. Whether seeking to return to their homes or to commit terrorist attacks, these individuals were identified as “infiltrators,” highlighting the illegal nature of their border-crossing and the perceived danger they posed to national security. Since 2008, the government of Israel began to apply this term to African asylum seekers and actively sought to utilize the Law against them. In the subsequent years, the Israeli Knesset worked diligently to draft a new amendment to the Law that would officially include African asylum seekers. In 2011 the Knesset successfully passed Amendment III (Amendment I and II referred to Palestinian populations) and implemented it in 2012.

Posted in Africa, Immigration, Israel | Comments Off on Refugees In Israel

Newsweek: To Undermine ISIS, We Should Welcome Syrian Refugees

I see no place to comment on this essay.

I am surprised by the number of Republicans who echo these talking points.

The essay does not mention the low average IQ of Syrians (about 83).

By Kim Cragin and Ben Connable of Rand Corporation:

It will take some time to parse all of the events in the Paris attacks, but reporting indicates that at least one of the suicide bombers used a stolen Syrian passport and followed the refugee path to France via Turkey and Greece.

This one attacker now has politicians on both sides of the Atlantic calling for moratoria on Syrian refugee programs.

We argue that the opposite approach—taking in even more Syrian refugees—is not only humane but could bleed the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) dry and deliver the kind of “strategic messaging” victory sought by the U.S.-led coalition.

The United Nations has registered 4.3 million refugees from the conflict in Syria and an additional 370,000 from Iraq. Approximately 123,000 of these refugees have sought asylum in Europe. Together, Canada and the United States have taken in about 5,400.

The international media have documented their journeys. These refugees have risked hypothermia, starvation and death. Families have been separated, and many loved ones have been lost. Yet they keep leaving their homes in search of a safer, better life.

These people deserve compassion for what they have experienced and admiration for their bravery. Of the 123,000, just one has so far been implicated in an attack.

The humanitarian crisis, by any measure, outweighs the risk. But that was known before the attacks in Paris. The challenge is that these attacks have increased pressure on government officials to do more. The calls for action are drowning out the cries for compassion. Instead of blocking Syrian refugees, more should be done. Taking in more Syrians could help defeat ISIS.

After all, what good is an Islamic caliphate if nobody wants to live there?

Posted in Islam, Syria | Comments Off on Newsweek: To Undermine ISIS, We Should Welcome Syrian Refugees

The Neocon Takeover Of The Conservative Movement

Paul Gottfried and Pat Buchanan don’t make the list. Nobody from Chronicles magazine (paleo-conservative). Ann Coulter and Mark Steyn are near the top, but their foreign policy has been largely neocon.

From RightWingNews:

50) Katie Kieffer
49) Thomas Purcell
48) Rachel Alexander
47) Kathy Shaidle
46) Susan Stamper Brown
45) Debra Saunders
44) Ben Domenech
43) Daniel Greenfield
42) Jeff Jacoby
41) John Fund
40) David Harsanyi
39) Cal Thomas
38) Jamie Weinstein
37) Mike Adams
36) Jack Kelly
35) Michael Barone
34) Doug Giles
33) Erick Erickson
32) Ross Douthat
31) James Antle
30) Philip Klein
29) Andrew McCarthy
28) John Ransom
27) Glenn Reynolds
26) Charles Cooke
25) Charles Krauthammer
24) Larry Elder
23) Dennis Prager
22) John Nolte
21) Megan McArdle
20) Matt Lewis
19) David Limbaugh
18) Todd Starnes
17) Rich Lowry
16) Kevin Williamson
15) John Stossel
14) Ashe Schow
13) Walter Williams
12) James Pethokoukis
11) Michelle Malkin
10) Victor Davis Hanson
9) Byron York
8) Milo Yiannopoulos
7) Ben Shapiro
6) Jonah Goldberg
5) Kurt Schlichter
4) Thomas Sowell
3) Ann Coulter
2) Mark Steyn
1) Matt Walsh

Posted in Ann Coulter, Conservatives, Neoconservatives | Comments Off on The Neocon Takeover Of The Conservative Movement

Us Vs Them

Anybody can understand the mentality of “us vs. them.” It’s the most basic divide.

The stronger your group identity, the more likely you are to have negative views of outsiders.

Nationalism is the most powerful political force in the world. It’s like fire. Very dangerous and very powerful.

There’s a tremendous dark side to “us vs. them” thinking but there is a tremendous dark side to avoiding “us vs. them” thinking. The West has been overrun with pathological altruism.

The audio montage in the following report? I love it!

The New York Times says:

The most striking hallmark was Mr. Trump’s constant repetition of divisive phrases, harsh words and violent imagery that American presidents rarely use, based on a quantitative comparison of his remarks and the news conferences of recent presidents, Democratic and Republican. He has a particular habit of saying “you” and “we” as he inveighs against a dangerous “them” or unnamed other — usually outsiders like illegal immigrants (“they’re pouring in”), Syrian migrants (“young, strong men”) and Mexicans, but also leaders of both political parties.

At an event in Raleigh, N.C., on Friday evening, his voice scratchy and hoarse, Mr. Trump was asked by a 12-year-old girl from Virginia, “I’m scared — what are you going to do to protect this country?”

“You know what, darling? You’re not going to be scared anymore. They’re going to be scared. You’re not going to be scared,” Mr. Trump said, before describing the Sept. 11 terrorists as “animals” who sent their families back to the Middle East. “We never went after them. We never did anything. We have to attack much stronger. We have to be more vigilant. We have to be much tougher. We have to be much smarter, or it’s never, ever going to end.”

While many candidates appeal to the passions and patriotism of their crowds, Mr. Trump appears unrivaled in his ability to forge bonds with a sizable segment of Americans over anxieties about a changing nation, economic insecurities, ferocious enemies and emboldened minorities (like the first black president, whose heritage and intelligence he has all but encouraged supporters to malign).

“‘We vs. them’ creates a threatening dynamic, where ‘they’ are evil or crazy or ignorant and ‘we’ need a candidate who sees the threat and can alleviate it,” said Matt Motyl, a political psychologist at the University of Illinois at Chicago who is studying how the 2016 presidential candidates speak. “He appeals to the masses and makes them feel powerful again: ‘We’ need to build a wall on the Mexican border — not ‘I,’ but ‘we.’”

Posted in America, Donald Trump, Nationalism | Comments Off on Us Vs Them