Why The Decline Of Violence In The West?

Comments to anthropologist Peter Frost:

* One interesting aspect of the punishment of criminals in the Sinosphere is a concept of shared familial responsibility. If a person committed a crime, not only the criminal himself would be punished, but often his entire family or clan would also be punished (stripped of rank, enslaved, have wife and children “confiscated,” etc.). This might have contributed to the relative lack of warmth in East Asian families — they tend to be hawkishly vigilant, constantly on the lookout to discover and reprimand family members and relatives (especially subordinate ones) for suspicious activities or even minor social faux pas. Presumably, individuals who treated their kinsmen harshly and who were susceptible to shaming by said kinsmen would leave significantly more descendants than individuals who either left their kinsmen up to their own devices or were thick-skinned and immune to their kinsmen’s heckling. The amount of paranoia and animosity toward family members that I have observed in many of my East Asian friends is quite shocking.

* East Asia has produced its fair share of high-trust environments, and indeed this is part of why East Asian business has been successful in many cases. The rotating credit associations for example that were instrumental in raising capital of Asians in the US to start businesses depend on a high degree of mutual trust. In fact analysts of “Asian values” produce solid evidence of high trust environments in East Asia. And Europe itself has been far from exempt in pursing clannishness for protection and help. The Irish are a prime example of clannishness at work, a phenomenon contributing much to their political success in places like the US. Likewise Italian Americans have at times been marked by mutually suspicious clannishness, particularly along regional and even intra-regional lines (Sowell- Ethnic America).

Frost writes: I’m sure Finns have high IQs, as do Russians, but the genes that influence intellectual capacity are not the same as the ones that influence latent aggressiveness, violence aversion, and anger threshold. Genes don’t come in packages marked “Good stuff” and “Bad stuff.” In any case, personal violence is not universally considered to be “bad.” In many cultures, violent males are admired and considered to be role models.

Russians aren’t Chechens, but in comparison to Western Europeans they show a stronger tendency toward familialism and defence of their families against perceived threats or insults. From my observation, when Russian men are with each other, they are more likely to engage in mildly aggressive behavior with each other or with strangers to see how far they can go. I’ve repeatedly seen this kind of brinkmanship in perfectly sober Russian men.

* …White southerners also exhibit a behavioral profile that corresponds more to what we see in less pacified human populations, e.g., greater importance attacked to “honor” and “face”, familialism, etc.

* The universe is neither moral nor immoral. We have imposed morality on an amoral world, under the influence of advanced religions like Christianity. Previously, notions of “good” and “evil” were based on Who-Whom. If something was good for me and my people, it was “moral.” If it was bad for me and my people, it was “immoral.” Christianity revolutionized morality by making it absolute and universal.

Posted in Asians, Crime | Comments Off on Why The Decline Of Violence In The West?

Facebook Curbs Speech

Comments:

* Diversity is always an excuse to conceal, bully, censor, punish, and suppress free expression.

* “This is particularly challenging for issues such as hate speech. Hate speech has always been banned on Facebook, and in our new community standards, we explain our efforts to keep our community free from this kind of abusive language.” ”

So, I guess Facebook will require that all the absurd “hip hop” and “gangsta rap” songs depicting the killing of cops and Whites will be deleted from and disallowed. Not.

* “It’s a challenge to maintain one set of standards that meets the needs of a diverse global community.”

There you have it, ladies and gentlemen. Diversity is not something that comes naturally and is embraced by all people. Diversity is a challenge and a problem that must be endured and worked on if it is to succeed (and it never does).

* Latin and Asian women are regarded as more feminine than the western white woman. This is partly because cultural Marxist brainwashing makes white women largely unsuitable for long term companionship.

Remove the filth of Marxist tyranny and you can see why every woman wants to look as white as possible. African weave and horse hair wig production is almost a billion dollar industry.

* The perpetually offended are in charge of setting the subjective standards.

The ADL and the Southern ‘Anything But’ Poverty Law Center will be monitoring for compliance.

* Some of those doofs are actually unhappy whenever they are *NOT* busy pretending to be “offended”. Political Correctness has taken on the trappings of a religion, in which the basic assumptions are not subject to debate; they are therefore dogma. Dissidents are thus relegated to the socially-dead status once reserved for witches and heretics, and persecution of us makes the PC bastards feel good about themselves.

I could write a completely neutral piece about the post-WW2 Soviet naval shipbuilding program and someone would crawl out of the woodwork, accuse me of “warmongering” and have a little snit-fit about being “offended”. If I wrote about home vegetable-gardening, someone else would whine about “introduced species”. Making fishing tackle, home-brewing hard cider or performing auto repairs? Oh, no; those are “red-necky”. Investment advice? “Capitalist exploiter” who needs to pay “his fair share”, which is apparently everything I possess.

They don’t care about reality anymore; inconvenient truths have been termed “hate facts” by some of these puerile jack-wagons in their War On Noticing.

* Black Pride: Acceptable.
Hispanic Pride: Acceptable.
Gay Pride: Acceptable.
White Pride: Banned for hate speech.

We all know the game and who will be targeted and who won’t and for what reasons.

* I value open debate on important and controversial issues. Shouting racial epithets and telling racist jokes does not contribute to the conversation on race the United States and the West needs to have.

Posted in Blacks, Facebook | Comments Off on Facebook Curbs Speech

Goy Rejected By All Jewish Summer Camps

REPORT: “The boy’s father feels he shouldn’t be rejected based on religion, and claims the 13-year-old boy just wants to be with his friends.”

Chaim Amalek: “Sorry, dude, but that’s life. Jews have no right to send their kids to muslim camp or school, and if a Jewish school or camp wants to exclude gentiles it should be free to do so.”

I am sure Jews would never complain about being refused by goyisha institutions such as schools, camps, hotels and restaurants.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Goy Rejected By All Jewish Summer Camps

How can you be a Somali-loving Minnesotan WASP pastor and embrace Israel?

A Jewish friend writes: Did the world screw up in recognizing a Jewish homeland – Israel – in 1948, or was it wise to do so, creating a place for 6,000,000 Jews to be who otherwise might be causing all kinds of problems in America and Europe?

The establishment of this racial/tribal/religious ethnostate was the last gasp of the European impulse to spread its dominion over the world, which is why real cultural liberals have to hate it.

A Jewish friend says:

I wanted to weigh in on whether having a fractured Arab world benefits Israel.

Before that, I think it is important to distinguish between what constitutes Jewish interests in the United States and Canada from Jewish interests in Western Europe, from Jewish interests in Eastern Europe and Jewish interests in Israel. I am not sure that they are at all the same.

If you study the history of the modern state of Israel as a dispassionate observer, it is pretty clear that it is a colonial state. It was founded and originally populated by Jews primarily from Eastern Europe, later with a large influx from Arab countries. The Jews displaced a native Arab population, that now calls itself Palestinian, but that simply designates the area they are from.

If you believe that God promised the land to the Jews, then none of this makes any difference, but that is not the sort of argument that one makes to people who are not so religiously inclined or sympathetic to that religious view (that is to say Christian Zionists.)

Because Israel has always been in a situation where it has a large restive internal population and until it signed a peace treaty with Egypt, at war not only with its neighbors but with its neighbor’s neighbors, its policies have always been expedient and the country has exploited Arab weakness with superior tactics, but without much of a strategic vision and certainly without attempting to implement any long term strategy for the country’s survival.

Israel benefits from having stability in neighboring countries, if those countries have a government that wants peace with Israel. Egypt is the perfect example of this. It served Israel to have the country have an authoritarian government, be it led by Sadat, Mubarak or no Al-Sissi. Egypt is desperately poor, and unlike Sadat’s predecessor Nasser, these men have not been demagogues seeking to divert frustration over lack of jobs and food into antagonism toward Israel. To go to Egypt’s neighbor, Libya, I don’t think Israel wanted its stability affected. If what happened to Libya happened to Egypt it would be a disaster for Israel. Israel could launch punitive raids on the Islamic fundamentalists, but much better to have the government reign them in and to be held responsible than to have unaccountable militias launch small scale attacks.

Syria and Iraq actually pose different threats to Israel. Both were relatively secular Baathist regimes. In both cases a member of a minority held power, Assad as an Alawite in Syria, Hussein as a Sunni in a Shia majority Iraq. (In fact, only a minority can effectively govern. A majority would snuff out the rights of the minorities, something that those who supported deposing Assad seem to forget.) Israel would much rather have antagonistic regimes be strictly Islamist than be ones that protect the minority. The strict Muslim governments would have less support in the West. Even Obama recognizes this in his willingness to deal with Iran which still has a large population of Christians, and smaller populations of BaHai’s and Jews.

I don’t think Israel thinks it makes any difference in a military senses whether Hussein or Assad are in power. Neither was in a position to militarily threaten Israel. Syria did fight Israel in 1967 and 1973 but its two allies in the 67 war and its one ally in 73 both made peace with Israel. Assad is a realist and knows that by attacking Israel he is signing his own death warrant.

There has been a strain in the Israeli government since at least 1967 that believes that Jordan, which has a majority Palestinian population, should depose its monarchy and become a Palestinian state, but pretty much most Israelis have been happy with the status quo first under King Hussein and now under his son King Abdullah.

I don’t think that if the Arabs weren’t involved in infighting that they would devote their resources to building war machines to challenge Israel or to fight Israel out of solidarity with their Palestinian brothers, but many Israelis would disagree with me.

Israelis have exploited and will continue to exploit factions within the Palestinians when they see if giving them a short term tactical advantage. It has been widely reported and I think accepted that Israel provided material support to Hamas when it first was organized because they wanted to split the Palestinians. Of course, they are not happy with Hamas which has proven to be a pretty intractable and resilient opponent of Israel. But you might want to imagine what it would be like for Israel if the Palestinians both in the West Bank and Gaza and those who are refugees all accepted the PLO as their legitimate government and representative. So in that sense, at least as regards the Palestinians, it serves Israel’s interest to keep them fractious.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on How can you be a Somali-loving Minnesotan WASP pastor and embrace Israel?

R. Eliyahu Fink Leaves Pacific Jewish Center

Rabbi Fink posts on FB: This coming week (Vayikra) will be my last week as the rabbi of Pacific Jewish Center | The Shul on the Beach. To send us off, the Shul is planning a community luncheon and we would love for you to join us.
When our landlord gave us 60 days notice, it gave us a chance to reevaluate our lives and we decided it was time to move on.
We part ways with the Shul on excellent terms. It’s been an incredibly life-changing 6.5 years and I will always be grateful for the opportunity to have been the rabbi of such a historic shul and special community. I have learned so much about myself and others, but above all, I have built memories, friendships, and relationships that will be a part of me forever. The time has come to move on and we are very excited about the bigger and better things ahead.
The Orthodox Jewish community really does not have anything like The Shul on the Beach. A traditional Orthodox service that is accessible and can appeal to people from all backgrounds and perspectives. A place without judgment and a place of warmth and comfort. A place of conscious living and personal growth. A place where everyone belongs. I have been asked about bringing “The Beach to Beverlywood“ – among other places – and I am eager and excited to accept this challenge.
Thank you to all of who I met at The Shul on the Beach or at our home in Santa Monica. To those of you who hoped to visit or meet at The Shul on the Beach, of course we would love for you to join us the Next Thing. Meanwhile, The Shul on the Internet lives on.
Fittingly, we just completed the Book of *Exodus* with these words:
!חזק חזק ונתחזק

Posted in PJC | Comments Off on R. Eliyahu Fink Leaves Pacific Jewish Center

Hmmm

11046656_10206171377314313_6237845200563203559_o

Posted in Humor | Comments Off on Hmmm

Hate Speech Not Banned On Campus

Blog post: In light of all the “shocked, shocked, I tell you” reactions to the video 0f an Oklahoma frat house’s racist chant, I pulled up some other instances of “hate speech” at American universities that somehow passed muster.

None of the people in these cases was in their teens, none was drunk, none was speaking to a private group of like-minded associates, as the Oklahoma boys were.

1. A black activist and visiting professor at North Carolina State University addressed a Howard University Law school panel in 2005 and advocated exterminating all white people on the planet as the only solution to black problems.

2. After the Washington Navy Yard shootings, a tenured professor at the University of Kansas tweeted that he hoped that the next shooting victims would be the sons and daughters of the NRA (National Rifle Association) since, in his view, they were responsible for the Navy Yard massacre.

He was put on indefinite leave, the only one on this list who was punished.

3. In 2012, Dr. Richard Parncutt advocated the death penalty for influential deniers of global warming.

4. In 2001, Mary Daly, a feminist professor at Boston College, advocated an evolutionary process that would result in a drastic reduction in the male population, as the only way to “decontaminate” the world.

5. Pete Singer, renowned bioethicist, argued in a published book thatKilling a defective infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person,” and “Sometimes it is not wrong at all.” Princeton gave him tenure in 1998.

6. The chairwoman of the University of Michigan’s Communications department wrote an oped whose first line was “I hate Republicans.” Further on in the piece, she referred to what she felt as “loathing.”

7. University of Rhode Island history professor Erik Loomis said this about the National Rifle Association’s executive vice-president, Wayne LaPierre: “I want Wayne LaPierre’s head on a stick.”

8. Rutgers University professor and poet Amiri Baraka has written, “”I got the extermination blues, jew-boys….” and “We want dagger poems in the slimy bellies of the owner-Jews.”

None of the views expressed above (even number 7, which was surely an actionable threat) received any serious punishment, except no. 2.

However, the next two views did get a swift and severe response from the university:

9. A tenured professor at Marquette University (a Catholic university, mind you) was fired for having criticized a graduate student who refused to allow any opposing view on gay marriage in her classroom.

10. An offer of tenure at the University of Illinois was rescinded after the candidate tweeted angry comments about Israel’s Gaza offensive in the summer of 2014.

So what’s the distinction between the first eight incidents and the last two?

The first eight all conform to the larger goals of the New World Order elites; the last two constitute obstacles to those goals.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Blacks, Race, Whites | Comments Off on Hate Speech Not Banned On Campus

R. Meir Kahane’s Final Book: Revolution Or Referendum

I searched Wiesenthal.com, the website of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, for “Kahane” and found no results.

Rabbi Kahane wrote:

“There must be a police station in every Israeli Arab village if growing Arab nationalism is to be effectively countered.”

These were not the words of some Arab-haling racist, but of the chief of the Israeli police, Davis Kraus testifying before the Knesset Interior Committee on August I, 1989. And Interior Committee chairman Yehoshua Matza adds, “Israel Arabs must be warned that if they continue their militant behavior they will bring on themselves a repetition of the 1948 tragedy.” Strange words for leaders of an Israel that boasts, regularly of Jewish-Arab coexistence.
Or consider what happened at a farewell party for the outgoing head of the Southern Command, Major General Yitzhak Mordechai, on July 30, 1989. In the presence of Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Chief of Staff Dan Shomron and other senior military officers, Haya Samir is invited to sing for the patricians. Samir, the only female Arab who ever served in the army and who was the soloist for the Southern Command entertainment troupe, is General Mordechai’s favorite singer. And so, the generals and officers and Israeli Jews sit back to enjoy their favorite Arab when she bursts into what the papers will later call, “The Intifada song.” In it she speaks of “fate-stricken people,” and “prisoners for execution” and “hungry for justice and chewing hate.”
A number of officers walked out while later a senior officer says: “I am shocked…”
Shocked. I too, but I am shocked that the Israeli general is shocked. For that speaks volumes for the deliberate blindness and refusal to understand anything about the Arabs of Israel. It symbolizes the “plantation” Sabra who smiles tolerantly at “his” Arabs and proclaims them happy content and loyal. One gapes, open-mouthed in awe, at the refusal to understand that the Arabs of Israel hate the Jews who, they believe, stole the land from them. One is stupefied at the inability or unwillingness to grasp the immutable, unbridgeable gap and contradiction between the very concept of a Jewish state and political equality for Arabs within it.
As a corollary to the myth that a Jewish State can also be a western democratic one, giving non-Jews exactly the kinds of equal rights possessed by Jews, is the delusion of “coexistence between Jews and Arabs.” And as part and parcel, of that picture of smiling, handholding Jews and Arabs, is the fiction of Arab loyalty to the State of Israel as transcending their Arabism. Nonsense!
It is not Arabs of the liberated lands, Judea-Samaria-Gaza, who are the ultimate threat, who are the essence of the problem. For those who call themselves “Palestinians,” are not to be found only in the territories. More than 750,000 of them live within the State of Israel-the Jewish State-itself They are the Arabs of Israel, who see themselves as “Palestinians,” who identify with the “Palestinian” people, who hate Israel and who see it as a robber, alien state that sits on a large part of what to them is really “Palestine.”
The Arabs of Israel are the reality of the worst nightmare imaginable for the liberal Jews of Israel (and the world). They exemplify the immutable contradiction between Zionism and a Jewish State on the one hand, and Western democracy and political equality on the other. The Arabs of Israel represent the most terrible threat to the intellectual stability of the western, modern Jew who so desperately created the myth in which he so desperately needed to believe, the myth that Judaism and democracy, Jewishness and Western values, are the same, are compatible, walk hand-in-hand. Of course that is nonsense, and Judaism and the very concept of a Jewish state differ radically totally, from Western civilization’s concept of democracy with its absolute political equality for all, regardless of religion or national background. And of course, that is horrible and a nightmare for the Western Jew. For if it is true that there is a contradiction here, then he must choose-and that is too unbearable. If it is true, then his life has been one huge intellectual lie-and that is anguish too awful to contemplate.
Sad. But it changes nothing. The truth remains. There is a basic, substantive contradiction between Judaism and Western culture, in entire areas of major ideas. And most specifically there is an unbridgeable conflict, utter contradiction, between Zionism, per Se, be it of the most secular or Left kind, and Western democracy.
Modern day Zionism arose in order to create a Jewish State. And a Jewish State was the dream of a people that had suffered unspeakable horrors and persecution as a minority in every land, and who now sought to cast off the role. The Jew no longer trusted the gentile, no longer sought tolerance for himself as a minority He wished to be a majority in his own land. That is Zionism, that is the concept of a Jewish State: A state in which the Jew will always control his own destiny will always be the captain of his own ship. And that can only be when and if the Jew is the majority. And so Zionism demands a permanent Jewish majority.
But that is not Western democracy. Western democracy is based on the concept of the equality of all people, of the right of one person to one vote-regardless of his ethnic, national or religious origin. According to Western democracy if the Arab will sit peacefully and quietly and become the majority, he has the absolute right to vote to shape the country in the way he sees fit, just as the Jews did when they were the majority. He can vote to change the character of Israel from a Jewish state to a Palestinian state, just as the Jews originally characterized it in the manner they saw fit. Under Zionism, of course, this is anathema. There can never be any change in Israel as the Jewish State, no matter what. It can never belong to the Arabs; it belongs to the Jewish people, including those of Boston.
Is there a contradiction between Zionism, Judaism, and a Jewish state on the one hand and Western democracy and equality for all people, on the other? Of course. And it is that terrible contradiction which can never be solved, that drives the schizophrenic Jew into spiritual agony and mental torture.
For years, he attempted to deceive the world, other Jews, himself into believing that democracy was compatible with Zionism. As long as the Arabs were few in numbers and backward, he succeeded. But that is long since gone. The Arab birthrate today is enormous. The mad Jew pays from National Insurance for each Arab baby born (until the age of 18, and one does not know whether to laugh or cry upon reading of the Israeli Bedouin Arab, father of 48 children-from six wiveswho collects 48 checks every month from suicidal Jews).
Meanwhile, Jews have 30,000 abortions a year and, in general, secular Jews have less children than required to regenerate the population, the average in North Tel Aviv’s liberal Ashkenazi area being 1.5 dogs to each child. And one adds to that the fact that Aliyah (immigration to Israel) is a total failure, a myth, with few Jews coming to Israel and many more leaving. (Indeed, the last weapon of Zionism is the US immigration quota. If the gates of America would be opened, hundreds of thousands of Israelis would be clamoring to enter the Golden Land. So much for the success of secular Zionism.)
The question is, what will happen in five years? Ten years? Twenty years? 1-low many Arabs will be living inside the Jewish State of Israel? I-low long will it remain the Jewish State of Israel? Know that already today the Galilee has a majority of Arabs. When one travels in the western Galilee, he is in an area that is more than 70% Arab. When one travels on the Acre-Safed road, except for Carmiel, there is not one sizeable Jewish settlement. The western Galilee is “Palestine”. Indeed, northern Israel, touching on Lebanon and Syria, is Israel’s budding Northern Ireland.
And what of the Triangle? Just behind the Israeli coastal plain, wherein live nearly Mo-third of Israel’s Jews, lies the Triangle. Just 10 kilometers from the coast, behind such Jewish cities as Petach Tikva and Kfar Saba and Ra’anana and Netanya and Herzylia, lies a total Arab mass. Towns and cities like Baka-alGarbia, Tayba, Tira, Kfar Kassem, the Wadi Ara area with its city of Um-alFaham (where the fundamentalist Moslems hold sway). More than 200,000 Israeli Arabs controlling the hinterland of the Israeli coast line.
And so, the fraud of the frenetic liberal-left axis. “Give up the territories so that we can have a Jewish Israel.” Aside from the obvious question to this “racist,” liberalleft cry, i.e.: “In a democratic humanist’s mind, what is the difference if the Arabs or Jews are the majority,” there is also the fraud that is blatant. Assuming that we do give up Judea-Samaria-Gaza-what does that gain us? Twenty years? For by then the Galilee and the Triangle will pose the same demographic threat as the territories do today. What do we do then? Give up the Galilee?
The Triangle? Shall we be left with a Jewish state on both sides of Tel Aviv’s Yarkon River? The Arabs of Israel wait, give birth, and hate. Let us end the nonsense of the myth of the “good Arab”.
Let us end the contempt of the Jew for the Arab that lies in the very question: “But are there no good Arabs?” How much contempt and shallowness lie in that absurd question! ‘Are there no good Arabs?” Of course, there are good Arabs. They are all good Arabs. The problem with liberal and leftist Jews is that they have not the slightest idea what a “good” Arab is. A good Arab is exactly like a good Jew. A good Jew is one who believes that Israel belongs to the Jewish people. Now you know what a good Arab is; yes, one who believes that it belongs to the Arab people. Why is the liberal Jew so obtuse? Clearly because he is too terrified to see the truth.
For years we deceived ourselves. For years, Jews would raise money at breakfasts, luncheons, dinners or suppers, by listening to some UJA or JNF functionary (or perhaps even an Israeli Cabinet Minister) proclaim: “We came to the land, found a desert and turned it into a garden” And Jews choked up and wrote checks in honor of the chalutzim (the pioneers) and others who drained swamps and cleared the wasteland. But if one were to attempt to tell that to an Arab, the latter would surely reply: “True. But it was my desert. Now it is your garden.”
How unpleasant, how unsettling, how agonizing to even semi-thinkers! But true. For years, the contempt of Jewish leftists and liberals for Arabs was stupefying. The myth of the happy Israeli Arab, so much better off than the Arabs of Iraq or Egypt. We have given them electricity and indoor toilets and now they sit happily Grateful. Loving us. What contempt! Is there one person with a shred of respect for himself who believes that Arabs will trade their national pride for electricity or indoor toilets? Not by bread alone does the Arab live. He is proud; he is a nationalist: and he believes that Jews are thieves-who stole his land. Is there one normal Jew who believes that there is even one Israeli Arab who enjoys living in a state that is called the “Jewish State?” The number of Arabs who enjoy that is exactly equal to the number of Jews who would enjoy it if America ever became a Christian State.
And is there even one Arab who enjoys singing his national anthem, Hatikva, with the words, “the soul of a Jew yearning”? How this speaks to him! And when it concludes with, “the hope of 2,000 years,” does the Arab break down and remember how his ancestors waited 2,000 years for the Jew to come home? Or does Hatikva mean “the dream”, and it was certainly that for the Jews. But for the Arab it was a nightmare. And on Independence Day in Israel, do Arabs rush happily into the streets to celebrate their defeat?
And yet, the terrified and shallow Jew persisted all these years in wishing to believe this nonsense. Either because he was too shallow to see the truth, or too frightened to wish to face it.
To believe that two people, both of whom claim title, ownership and sovereignty over a land, can live together without violence and bloodshed, is to fly in the face of reality All over the world national, ethnic, religious and language differences divide peoples and lead to war and bloodshed. In Northern Ireland, in Sri Lanka, in India, in Bulgaria, in Iraq, in the Philippines, in Senegal, in Tibet, in Spain, in Corsica, in Belgium, in tens of other places throughout the world, people who differ only in ethnicity or religion or language, are at each other’s throats. But liberals and leftists would have us believe that Jews and Arabs who differ in religion, national background, language, culture-everything-can share the land. Jews can live with Arabs who cannot live with themselves – Madness!
The truth is that the Arabs of Israel call themselves Palestinians, hate Israel, and wait for the moment of truth. Not only is their population growth enormous (even as entire cities like Acre, Jaffa, Lydda, Ramie, lower Haifa, become Arab) but thanks to the mad Jew, the Arab today is qualitatively different from his father and grandfather. From 110,000 mostly illiterate Arabs in 1948, thanks to the insanity of the Jews, there are now 750,000 educated ones. And one listens to the Cabinet Ministers and Knesset Members boasting of the educational progress they have given the Arabs, and we know that we are in the hands of madmen. We are proud that we have educated them? We beam at the thought that 4,000 Arabs study in Israel’s universities? Have we become total cretins? Who will be leaders of the PLO tomorrow if not the educated ones? Is it not obvious to all but the dullest of dullards that the revolution never comes from the numb and the dumb but rather from the educated? With our own hands and money (from the American Friends of Hebrew University or Tel Aviv U. or Haifa U. or Ben Gurion U.) we are creating the intellectual and political leaders who will attempt to wipe us out, Mind-boggling!

Posted in Arabs, Israel, R. Meir Kahane | Comments Off on R. Meir Kahane’s Final Book: Revolution Or Referendum

Michael Douglas Probes The Mysteries Of The Universe

Michael writes for the LATimes.com:

Dylan’s experience reminded me of my first encounter with anti-Semitism, in high school. A friend saw someone Jewish walk by, and with no provocation he confidently told me: “Michael, all Jews cheat in business.”

Where on earth would anyone get the idea that Jews are dishonest in business? Why is the word ‘Jew’ synonymous with dishonesty for hundreds of millions of people? Bizarre.

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on Michael Douglas Probes The Mysteries Of The Universe

A People That Shall Dwell Alone

A friend says: I finished Kevin MacDonald‘s A People That Shall Dwell Alone. I had no idea that Haredim hated red haired dudes so much!

He wrote it in early 90s, and does not / did not see or foretell how massive Jewish – Gentile marriage would be among non-Haredi Jews. He also failed to understand that the rising demo of Jews, the Haredim, are incapable of lording over gentiles because they raise their kids to be incapable of interacting with the broader culture, denying them even Mexican level education

There is a quote or two that I found funny. Haredi men with red hair say it is hard to find a mate because red hair is said to not look Jewish.
Also, this sentence that I jotted down: “In looking at photographs of groups of Haredim one is struck by their almost clone-like degree of phenotypic resemblance.”
Yup to that. Especially the girls. They all look like sisters or first cousins. Because often they are the product of highly consanguineous marriages.
These people will go the way of Jews living in Muslim lands. Impoverished and viewed with disgust by the broader culture, even if they are not persecuted for their beliefs (far from it).
In NY, these kids leave school barely knowing what a 10 year old Mexican knows, apart from Toyreh.

Posted in Jews, Kevin MacDonald | Comments Off on A People That Shall Dwell Alone