The TRUMP Fight Song [unofficial] – TRUMP 2016

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* That song has been played at several Trump rallies.

It is revealing to observe how the MSM tries to tell us that Trump does not appeal to this or that demographic group, ethnicity or race. In fact, he has broad appeal across lines — while still having the respect of the base you identify.

I know several, legitimate immigrants and naturalized citizens who like candidate Trump. These people came here legally, with skills and culture. They jumped through all the hoops our laughable immigration system put in front of them. They paid all the fees, met every requirement, attended every appointment, took every test, and waited through every long step in the process. They resent anyone who cuts in line. They hate those who come here for a handout. They learned and speak English. They admire independent business owners.

Trump will win votes from the base and much more, particularly LEGAL immigrant naturalized citizens of every race — and their American friends and families.

Yeah, people respect strength. I think that if white conservatives demonstrate some self-respect and determination, they will find they have friends in some surprising places. I’m pretty sure my immigrant dad would vote for Trump if he were the GOP nominee.

The message our society currently sends to immigrants and minorities is, “Come dance on Whitey’s grave!” If that message were changed to, “We’re taking our country back; is your loyalty to us or to your old country?” there would be nothing to lose and a lot to gain. To put it differently, immigrants and minorities are currently spoken for by (as Steve recently observed) Jewish liberals in the media. If immigrants/minorities were put on the spot and made to speak for themselves, it could only be an improvement. At the very least we’d know whose side they’re on; one could no longer finesse tribal conflicts of interest with BS about dreams and propositions.

MORE COMMENTS:

* I think Steve is hitting on something important here – Spanish really isn’t as cool as it used to be.

Back when Jeb!’s brother was selling himself as fluent in Spanish 15 years ago, it arguably was cool.

But I think a combination of the The War On Terror and the rise of China kind of put a kibosh on that. It looked cosmopolitan to brush up on your Spanish fifteen years ago, now it looks parochial.

Mandarin or Arabic, that’s where the smart kids are heading.

* Yeah, Jeb seems to be operating on the theory that the United States is just Florida writ large, so the approach he used successfully in Florida will translate seamlessly to the national stage.

In Florida’s political climate, seeing politicians switch effortlessly between Spanish and English is seen as no biggie, even for redneck voters, because everybody just writes it off as “oh, they’re pandering to the Cuban vote again.” Since Cubans aren’t (yet) seen as a wholly owned and operated subsidiary of the Democratic party, Republicans here don’t mind it that much. Jeb doesn’t seem to get that this sort of thing plays very differently in Iowa.

On the other hand, it does suggest that ethnic grievance groups who want real political power would be advised to spread themselves a little more widely across the political spectrum. Cubans, like Jews, have been very successful in getting their policy preferences set in stone precisely because they’ve been so good at avoiding being tied exclusively to one party — thus a Republican who panders to Cuban donors isn’t seen as “selling out” his redneck constituents.

The non-Cuban “Hispanic vote,” though, is still seen as monolithically Democratic and leftist, despite the best efforts of lobbyists — therefore, a GOP candidate who openly panders to Hispanics gets tagged as a Democrat in sheep’s clothing.

Or to put it in a way that iSteve readers might appreciate: While everybody knows most Jews are Democrats, everyone also knows there are some very loud, red-meat right-wing Jewish Republicans, so most white, Christian Republican voters aren’t terribly threatened by a Republican who talks up Jewish issues. There’s a similar dynamic at work in Florida with politicians pandering to Cubans. But where are all the loud, red-meat, right-wing Mexican-American activists and intellectuals? Where’s the Mexican-American version of Rush Limbaugh that Hispanics can point to and say, “see? Letting us have our way doesn’t have to be so bad.”

If La Raza or Black Lives Matter want to take it to the next level, maybe they need to develop their own neocon wings…

* Wanna know a big fat irony?

Bush 41 criticized Michael Dukakis in the 1988 campaign for campaigning to Hispanic voters in Spanish.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on The TRUMP Fight Song [unofficial] – TRUMP 2016

Australia & Israel Show How To Deal With Illegal Immigrants

Let’s follow their example.

Operation Sovereign Borders breaks people smugglers: Not one boat has reached Australia in the past year
August 6, 2015 7:00am
Daniel Meers The Daily Telegraph

The success of Operation Sovereign Borders has forced Opposition Leader Bill Shorten to adopt the policy as an “option” for the next election

20 boats have been turned back since December 2013

‘If boats had got through, more would have tried the journey’

AUSTRALIA has gone an ­entire year without a single people-smuggling boat successfully reaching land.

Immigration Minister Peter Dutton yesterday confirmed the milestone, revealing 20 boats, with more than 600 people on board, had successfully been turned around since December 2013.

All boats were sent back to their country of origin.

“We have been able to stare down these evil people smugglers that would trade in bringing people to our country and under Operation Sovereign Borders not to have had a successful people-smuggling venture for 12 months is a very significant outcome,’’ Mr Dutton said.

Last month a Vietnamese boat with more than 40 asylum seekers on board was turned around off the West Australian coast.

Mr Dutton said, had the 20 boats got through, it might have led to up to 2000 boats trying to make the deadly journey, which saw about 1200 people drown at sea under the previous government.

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection Peter Dutton.
“It’s why (Sovereign Borders) will remain because we are not going to allow the deaths at sea to recommence,” Mr Dutton said.

“I’m not going to allow detention centres to be refilled by new children arriving on boats — 2000 children were in detention under Labor.”

Under Labor more than 50,000 people arrived illegally on about 800 boats.

The success of Operation Sovereign Borders has forced Opposition Leader Bill Shorten to adopt the policy as an “option” for the next election.

The move split the party at Labor’s national conference last month when deputy leader Tanya Plibersek, senate leader Penny Wong and leadership rival Anthony Albanese opposed the move being written into the policy platform.

Mr Dutton said the split made it questionable whether Labor would turn back boats.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* We should start using rubber bullets and bean bag rounds. They have worked quite well for the Jews in Israel. If a couple folks get killed, it will be a shame, of course, but it can’t be helped. Non-lethal rounds are not perfect, after all.

Also, the Israeli rhetoric that terrorists are “hiding behind women and children” can be used to transfer some of the blame to the smugglers.

Judging from the article you quoted, the Aussies are using similar rhetoric, suggesting that the “smugglers” are killing children.

Reviving the term “snakeheads” to refer to smugglers would be nice. It is a Chinese term translated into English, and therefore is not a “racist” invented term.

* I noticed that when Jorge Ramos was trying to grandstand at the Trump presser, he used that line that you cannot deport 11 million. But then he went further and said you cannot build a fence that is 2000 miles long.

One can suggest that deporting 11 million (probably up to 30 million in reality) would be difficult and might require some tactics that aren’t well suited for the squeamish of SJWs. But building a fence is a piece of cake. Even Trump later on suggested that building a 95 story building would be more difficult than a 1900 mile fence.

The point is the left likes to use what Buchanan referred to as the Theory of Inevitability to get their opponents to lie down and give up the fight before it even begins.

Posted in Australia, Immigration | Comments Off on Australia & Israel Show How To Deal With Illegal Immigrants

Weenie Whities Vs Crazy Crackas

Comments to Steve Sailer: Blue-state whites are “Weenie Whities” and Red-State whites are “Crazy Crackas.”

…there are three regions where blacks appear to be kept more in line — 1) the Deep South plus the lower Appalachians, especially Tennessee and West Virginia; 2) the northern part of the Mountain West; and 3) the parts of the Northeast that have more rural areas, especially Maine.

Compared to other white Americans, those of Celtic ancestry are more clannish and warlike, more honor-driven and less law-regarding. The hell with being tattle-tales to law enforcement — how about we just settle this little thing ourselves, like men. Picking up that vibe from whites at the grassroots level must make black criminals think twice about stepping on the wrong man’s dick — if he doesn’t pursue you to within an inch of his own life just to bring about your death, then his kinfolk may just round up a party and track you down like an animal, unencumbered in whatever they do by legal regulations since the authorities won’t know about it.

Of course it doesn’t require a real-life rude awakening — you can just size up whether some pale-skin is a weenie whitie or a crazy cracka.

At any rate, if a state’s white population is made up mostly of Culture of Law groups, then at the grassroots level whites appear wimpy in the eyes of blacks. Should they be victimized, they won’t make waves, but rather call on the law enforcement system to administer justice. Black criminals in those states must sense that most of the local white targets are wimps, strengthening their resolve and making them more careless. It’d be like taking candy from a baby. But eventually the law does catch up to them, and these states see higher rates of black imprisonment.

Also, I doubt that most of those low black imprisonment rates in Celtic regions is due to whites forming kangaroo courts and lynch mobs after a crime has already been committed — you’d hear about that at least some of the time. Rather the difference in white attitude seems to serve more as a deterrent — like, I better check myself around here, these white folks be CRAZY.

English Puritans and Socialist Scandinavians may provide a greater sense of stability and structure, but they may wind up relying too much on authority, while neglecting their involvement in everyday self-policing. And in an ethnically mixed-up country like ours, that approach doesn’t seem to be intimidating enough to black criminals. It’s better suited to shaming would-be criminals of Norwegian etc. ancestry before they even try it.

But blacks look at the law enforcement system as just a bunch of overpaid punks — whatchu pigs gon’ do, huh? I’ll sue for police brutality! That’s when you need more rambunctious whites to curb bad black behavior at the grassroots level. Sometimes it takes barbarians to deter a savage.

* This weenie white versus crazy crackas situation is what got Emmett Till killed. He though he could grab and proposition a young married white woman (“don’t worry, I fscked white wimmin before”) when her husband was out of town. He found out to his eternal chagrin that crazy crackas don’t play that game like weenie whites in Chicago.

His own mother told him not to act the fool and do stupid shite down south, but he was bound and determined to act the urban fool and impress his homies in Mississippi.

Emmett wound up as dead as his soldier daddy did for raping white women in Europe after WWII.

Madison, which had maybe 1-2 murders a year 30 years ago (family/romance gone bad), has had a spate of black home invasion/gang rape/murders in the last few years.

Posted in America, Blacks, Whites | Comments Off on Weenie Whities Vs Crazy Crackas

Is birthright citizenship the right policy for the U.S.A. today?

John Derbyshire tackles Linda Chavez’s NY Post op/ed:

We have changed our collective mind about all sorts of things that our Constitution and laws once allowed—most notably slavery, of course. Perhaps we should change our minds about this. Is birthright citizenship a good thing for us today, or not? What are the arguments for it, as benefiting the U.S.A. and U.S. citizens? May we hear them, please?

Let’s hope we don’t need a Civil War to sort this one out.

At the time the 14th Amendment passed, there was considerable debate regarding groups that would be equivalent to today’s illegal immigrants, though the distinction between “legal” and “illegal” immigrants did not apply because no laws restricted immigration then.

Sen. Edgar Cowan, D-Pa., railed against those whose citizenship might be affirmed under the new amendment, calling for “expelling a certain number of people who invade her borders; who owe to her no allegiance; . .  . who pay no taxes; who never perform military service; who do nothing, in fact, which becomes the citizen, and perform none of the duties which devolve upon him.”

Sound familiar? But he wasn’t talking about Mexicans. “I mean the Gypsies,” he said.

If that’s what he meant, I must say, Sen. Cowan was talking good sense.

Another Cowan diatribe sounds eerily prescient of Trump’s warnings: “There is a race in contact with this country which, in all characteristics except that of simply making fierce war, is not only our equal, but perhaps our superior.”

This will be baffling to readers unfamiliar with 19th-century American anxieties. Why doesn’t she tell us which race Sen. Cowan meant? Is it over-suspicious of me to think that perhaps she left the race unidentified so that some subset of her readers would take the Senator’s remarks to have been anti-Semitic?

In fact Sen. Cowan clarified his meaning in his next sentence: “I mean the yellow race; the Mongol race.” He was expressing the common and perfectly reasonable fear that our Pacific coast, under-populated and remote from the centers of American civilization, would succumb to a mass influx from China, then populous at the Malthusian limit and in the throes of late-dynastic turmoil.

(Note that Sen. Cowan’s fears were founded in part on the belief that East Asians were “perhaps our superior.” A little later he says: “Of their industry, their skill, and their pertinacity in all worldly affairs, nobody can doubt.” The same fear of admitting great numbers of a superior race shows up in the congressional debates on Japanese exclusion in the 1920s. Racist? I guess so; but surely not “supremacist.”)

… Trump is dead wrong on birthright citizenship, and Republicans shouldn’t follow him down the rabbit hole.

Once again: If birthright citizenship is a good thing for our nation today, let’s hear the arguments.

If the legal/constitutional position is what Ms Chavez says it is, but no longer the right policy for our country, let’s change it, as other nations have done: Australia (2007), New Zealand (2005), Ireland (2005), France (1993), …

COMMENTS TO JOHN DERBYSHIRE:

* Anyone who is successful in a socio-political system that can be objectively viewed with suspicion, e.g. Latin America, the Middle East, Southern Europe, Russia, the Balkans, Subsaharan Africa and identitarian hustlers in the West, warrants suspicion. They’ve learned the techniques used to get on top. If you succeed in a highly corrupt environment, you surely didn’t get there squeaky clean or tainted no matter what your individual worth.

The problem is American whites just aren’t equipped to deal with it. Yes, we yell. Yes we also use public shaming as a socially conditioning technique. Yes we have white collar corruption. But let’s be honest, we have nothing on those cultures in which mistrust and amoral familism have permeated public life for centuries. Those same Americans who will scream at a politician at a Tea Party townhall will stand in line at any business and pay their taxes.

Why deal with that pathological crap if we can avoid it? The US has its own pathologies and they are numerous and pervasive, but that doesn’t mean should import others. And just because reform has been possible in the past with groups who came from corrupt societies, doesn’t mean it will always work.

I agree with liberals and leftists that the Constitution should reflect changing realities. I’d also say that the Declaration of Independence was hopelessly naive, written by a young, dreamy Virginian subject to flights of fancy, even if he could turn a fancy phrase. He was simultaneously one of the greatest minds our nation ever produced, whose ideas are models for us all, and a dangerous fool who should have never been allowed within twenty feet of pen or paper.

Corruption indices, poverty as indicator of corruption and poor leadership, anthropological studies that indicate if a society is plagued by extreme misogyny, low levels of trust, amoral familism or tribal/clan nepotism. Of the list I gave, YOU give me an example of ONE of country that is by any objective standard mostly liberal with a transparent government and whose indigenous cultures are committed to impartial meritocracy.

Who said “white” America? That’s your little addition, channeling Professor Ignatiev, are you? Indeed Latin America has been historically ruled (or misruled) by a white or almost white elite. Eastern Europeans are white.

Naive, yes. The Declaration of Independence should have been very specific. It should have used specific language limiting its claims to the American community as was. We could have incorporated later arrivals, but we would have much more control over the rate of incorporation and the terms on which they joined without being charged with hypocrisy and our indigenous leftist elements and cheap labor lobbies and war-mongerers would not have had such a strong propagandistic tool.

But that’s Jefferson for you. All high-minded ideas, but not concerned with minor details. That fool committed us to all sorts of crap with his “all men.” Same goes for the 14th Amendment. It should have been much clearer and more specific, i.e. “we hereby grant citizenship to former slaves, who were held by in the territories of the US, excluding former slaves from foreign territories (e.g. West Indians like Louis Farrakhan, Colin Powell or Eric Holder), and their descendants.”

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on Is birthright citizenship the right policy for the U.S.A. today?

L.A. Illegals` Welfare Access: Laura Ingraham Correctly Raises Anchor Baby Issue

From VDARE in 2013: One of the genuine Patriotic heroes of the American Immigration disaster has done it again:

A projected $650 million in welfare benefits will be distributed to illegal alien parents in 2013, county officials said Monday.

Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich announced the latest figures from the Department of Public Social Services….An estimated 100,000 children of 60,000 undocumented parents receive aid in Los Angeles County, according to Antonovich

“When you add the $550 million for public safety and nearly $500 million for healthcare, the total cost for illegal immigrants to county taxpayers exceeds $1.6 billion dollars a year,” Antonovich said in a statement. “These costs do not even include the hundreds of millions of dollars spent annually for education

Undocumented LA County Parents On Pace To Receive $650M In Welfare Benefits CBS Los Angeles September 16, 2013 (VDARE.com emphasis)

Antonovich has been making a habit of collecting and compiling these figures, as I noted in 2011 in Drudge Scores Twofer: Immigrant/American Job Grab, and Anchor Baby Costs and last year in Antonovich Raises Anchor Baby Costs Again. Where Is Congressional GOP?

In a healthy political climate this enterprising work would have made Republican Antonovich a strong GOP candidate for statewide office rather than pitiful morons like Meg Whitman.

But this is Mexifornia where, thanks to a critical degree to treasonous forces within the GOP, Mexican mestizos have been allowed to achieve the most spectacular migratory conquest since their ancestors crossed the Bering Strait.

Applaud Michael Antonovich

As usual, Antonovich’s work has been ignored by most of the MSM even in California. But a Point-and Splutter at MediaMatters Conservative Media`s Misplaced Hysteria Over Immigrants And Welfare by Solange Uwimana September 18 2013 notes several “Right-wing” websites did pick it up and also the wonderful Laura Ingraham who

…read the news on her radio show and used it to call for the end of birthright citizenship — which, under the 14th Amendment, makes anyone born in this country an American citizen. She also argued that the news should end all talk of immigration reform.

Of course, she is right.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on L.A. Illegals` Welfare Access: Laura Ingraham Correctly Raises Anchor Baby Issue

White Riot

Brett Stevens writes: Diversity creates racism. It does so by forcing groups into competition when they would rather live among their own and have self-determination, or the ability to rule themselves and choose their own future. Racism creates rancor, and if there is a perceived economic or power imbalance, it creates race warfare.

That is what is happening on the streets of America today. Currently, it is white-vs-black drama, but this will soon expand to include other groups, even those that like Hispanic indios and Asians tend to use more indirect methods. Speaking of indirect methods, check out the response. After years of being silenced by accusations of “racism,” white people are mobilizing in protest.

One night after Deputy Darren Goforth was executed at the Chevron station in Houston, over a thousand people gathered at the site to memorialize the man who was apparently murdered simply because he wore a police uniform, as reported by Breitbart Texas. Thousands more gathered on Sunday night to walk the streets in the suburban neighborhood where he was killed.

As reported by Breitbart Texas, the escalation of anti-white and anti-cop rhetoric has been building since militant black activists began marching in support of #BlackLivesMatter after the suicide of Sandra Bland. At protests at the jail where Bland killed herself, a radical activist called for all white people to be killed, and heavily armed members of the New Black Panther Party chanted “the revolution has started … off the pigs.” A Texas-based internet radio show called for the lynching of whites and the killing of police officers. Last week, two white journalists and a white deputy sheriff have been assassinated by blacks who appear to be carrying out the message of hate.

White people favor indirect methods. They prefer to march, sing bad folk songs on acoustic guitar, wave signs and write letters. They show up for midnight vigils. They produce (endless) blogs and editorials. And let us not forget the first-person novels. This is how someone accustomed to a European-style society registers displeasure. They do not achieve displeasure without first having doubts and fears, and when all of those come together, an emotional wave sweeps the population. (Then they usually choose the wrong option based on other fears and that dreaded hallmark of all failure, moral laziness).

For a population that only a decade ago was afraid to discuss race at all, this is a big shift, even a sea change, if you will. The cat is out of the bag and the dissent is spreading.

Posted in Whites | Comments Off on White Riot

Rename All The Mountains

Brett Stevens writes: Our identity is WASP, which is (in the New World) shorthand for Western European. This population is distinct from Eastern and Southern European as well as outliers like the Irish, who have an Iberian-North African descended strain in them and group genetically with Southern Europeans. This identity is what saves us from all the methods of liberalism like big government, equality, feminism, diversity, deviance norming and social breakdown. We must always assert this identity strongly because among us there are unhappy people and neurotics who will always and pathologically work to destroy it….

Obama renamed Mt. McKinley in order to damage the self-esteem and self-image of Western Europeans in the new world. He wants them to feel like a subjugated people, which is the necessary consequence of having foreign names around them. In particular, he wants to re-inforce the guilt narrative regarding the people he calls “Native Americans” or “First Nations” when they are in fact neither. The most likely scenario for Amerinds, as they are technically called, is that multiple groups came over from the old world, but the group from Siberia was most numerous and out-reproduced the others. Obama hopes for a similar fate for America and Europe, as do all liberals, which is why beating back “racism” and adopting massive third world immigration has been the central focus of their activity in the postwar period.

As Robert Frost noted when he penned “Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,” life often produces binaries when a choice comes down to the line. We cannot use a method here of imposing categorical logic by saying “all binaries are bad,” but should note that at some point one either chooses to act toward what is right, or accepts whatever else comes down the pipe. What is right in this case is asserting our cultural identity exclusively because it is necessary for our survival, and failing to do so will only produce another mixed-heritage third world burnout of a former empire. It may be most convenient to use some familiar names, or to cuckold ourselves as Obama desires we do, but the right thing to do waits for no man. It is an opportunity either seized or a defeat and self-destruction slowly but certainly growing near.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Rename All The Mountains

Our Struggle

What we are trying to fix is to avoid being thrown en masse into a pit of death because of the machinations of a tiny tiny number of our tribe. That’s what affiliated Jews call, “self-hating.” When you try to slow down the push for conflict and martyrdom.

That’s why we need Jews for Consistency.

How can one change the world? I see some options.

* You can come to peace with yourself and radiate your happiness outward.
* You can contribute to your community and build up your people and your country.
* You can have great kids and raise them right.
* You can propound good ideas and shed light on complicated matters so that increased clarity in the world leads to decreased unnecessary suffering.

I try to make the world a better place by improving myself, improving my own happiness and inner peace, improving my finances and my health and my psyche, being of service to others (both to those in my Orthodox Jewish community and to others), improving my place in the world so that I can marry and have children, and I try through my writing to promote good ideas and to shed light on complicated matters.

I don’t feel much of a conflict between my allegiance to my group (Orthodox Jews) and to my search for universal truths. I don’t want anything for my group that I do not want for other groups. I think ethno-nationalism is good for everyone. I believe that each people has special gifts and has a special role to play in the world. Aborigines and Jews, for instance, have very different gifts and are probably not well suited to living amongst each other.

It is equally important to me that Jews prosper and that non-Jewish Europeans prosper even though it seems like in history, the fortunes of these two groups often go in opposite directions (i.e., that the stronger and more cohesive whites are, the more vulnerable Jews are, and the stronger Jews are, the less cohesive and strong whites are). This strikes me as tragic.

I often have trouble talking about these ideas with people because ties “bind and blind” to quote Jonathan Haidt. The stronger your group identity, the more difficult it is for you to see things objectively. The more you identify with your group, the more likely you are to fear and dislike outsiders. The more beliefs you hold and the more strongly you hold them, the more protected and armored you are against observing reality objectively. Almost all beliefs are simply unnecessary muscular tension. Several times a day, I make a deliberate effort to let go of my beliefs so that for a minute or two, I can see the world with fresh eyes, freed of the compression that goes with my belief system. I usually notice my neck and back and face freeing up as I let go of commitments, my breath frees up, and movement and observation become easier. Without this practice, I tend to live top-down 95% of the time, with my cognitive commitments framing everything I encounter in reality so that life becomes drained of surprise and joy.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Our Struggle

Steve Sailer: What Do Milwaukee, St. Louis, Baltimore, Washington, and New Orleans Have in Common?

Steve Sailer comments on the New York Times article: What do these five cities with fast growing homicide rates in 2015 v. 2014 have in common: Milwaukee, New Orleans, Baltimore, Washington, and St. Louis?

They are all cities where the vast majority of homicides are committed by blacks, and these tend to be particularly troubled black communities. The problems of Wisconsin blacks are a long-time iSteve focus, while David Simon has devoted much of his TV career to the problems of Baltimore and New Orleans blacks.

So, one possibility is that when the Obama Administration encourages blacks to feel aggrieved, blacks in the worst black slums respond to their leadership’s urgings by murdering each other in even larger numbers than normal.

Heckuva job, Obammie!

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: What Do Milwaukee, St. Louis, Baltimore, Washington, and New Orleans Have in Common?

Our Life Scripts

Therapist Rinda Hall says: “We recreate our deepest childhood wounds in our relationships. Our life scripts have set the scene. Unconsciously, we employ other people to recreate the pain we suffered growing up. If you were abandoned, you set the stage to be abandoned throughout your life. Your life script tells you that you are flawed and that you do not deserve to be loved, honored or respected. However faulty this thinking is, we recreate it in our lives…”

Posted in Addiction | Comments Off on Our Life Scripts