JPOST: Russian president says predominantly Jewish Soviet government was guided by false ideological considerations

Jerusalem Post:

Russian President Vladimir Putin said that at least 80 percent of the members of the first Soviet government were Jewish.

“I thought about something just now: The decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, whose composition was 80-85 percent Jewish,” Putin said June 13 during a visit to Moscow’s Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center.

Putin was referencing the library of Rabbi Joseph I. Schneerson, the late leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement. The books, which are claimed by Chabad representatives in the United States, began being moved to the museum in Moscow this month.

According to the official transcription of Putin’s speech at the museum, he went on to say that the politicians on the predominantly Jewish Soviet government “were guided by false ideological considerations and supported the arrest and repression of Jews, Russian Orthodox Christians, Muslims and members of other faiths. They grouped everyone into the same category.

“Thankfully, those ideological goggles and faulty ideological perceptions collapsed. And today, we are essentially returning these books to the Jewish community with a happy smile.”

Widely seen as the first Soviet government, the Council of People’s Commissars was formed in 1917 and comprised 16 leaders, including chairman Vladimir Lenin, foreign affairs chief Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin, who was in charge of the People’s Commissariat of Nationalities.

Posted in Jews, Russia | Comments Off on JPOST: Russian president says predominantly Jewish Soviet government was guided by false ideological considerations

More Black NFL Players Sit During The National Anthem

Chaim Amalek writes: Yes, I want to see more Black Men rub the noses of the prosperous, White, Male pussies who make up the typical audience in attendance at an NFL game in it. Again and again. I want these Black Men to treat wHITE NFL (ditto the NBA) fans the way Pakistani men treat 12 year old white girls in Rotherham. More, please!

Posted in Blacks, Football | Comments Off on More Black NFL Players Sit During The National Anthem

Angela Merkel Pivots On Immigration

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* The issue of open borders and immigration is only one of many symptoms of the disease of moral and cultural relativism that threatens the continued existence of Western civilization. I’m not optimistic regarding the outcome. What are the chances for survival of a country or a civilization that religiously believes:

1. There are no differences between men and women. There are also no differences between adults and children (other than the former are usually taller than the latter).

2. There are no differences among religions … especially, Christianity and Islam.

3. All cultures are created equal, just as all people are created equal.

4. Both people and capital should flow freely across what used to be called borders; in short, there are no such things as nations as we used to understand them.

This includes the right of 5.9 billion people living in underdeveloped countries to migrate to developed countries. Once there, it is the obligation of the developed countries to provide social welfare and social services to the immigrants until cultural, religious, language, and literacy and other educational issues can be overcome (reading Arabic characters right-to-left and then trying to learn reading Latin characters left-to-right has proved exceptionally difficult). Other difficulties in dealing with massive Chinese and other Asian immigration have yet to be addressed; that is, how to deal with immigrants who only know tonal-based languages and symbol-based writing systems.

5. In the name of equality, religious freedom, and respect for different cultures, allowances must be made in the developed countries for cultural piccadellos such as polygamy, pedofilia, female circumcisum, and the suppresion of female rights. This includes making allowance for dressing all females older than 5-years of age in black bags with eye slits whenever they are in public. In the name of tolerance, the age-old practice of Hindi women immolating themselves on the funeral pyres of their dead husbands is under review. Honor killings are next in the queue for a sympathetic review.

6. In the name of personal liberty and diversity, there are absolutely no elements of social deviancy in the social and sexual practices of the LGBTS&M … xyz communities. In the interest of justice, they will be treated on par with the myriad immigrant cultures. Indeed, it is the traditional family and its absurd assumptions about restrictive, gender-based social roles that is in need of intervention as anti-social behavior, given how hostile its adherents are toward cultural, religious, social, sexual, and moral diversity.

Posted in Germany | Comments Off on Angela Merkel Pivots On Immigration

A Young Gay Trump Supporter Confronts the ‘Politics of Personal Destruction’

Stacy McCain writes: Lucian Wintrich is an artist in New York who lost his job because of his “Twinks for Trump” campaign. (“Twink” is gay slang for an attractive young male.) If you think Democrats are pro-gay, you should know what kind of persecution they inflict on gay Republicans:

Wintrich had his social media accounts shut down, was continuously harassed, and then ultimately fired from his job at one of New York’s largest advertising agencies.

In a stunning exception to its normal partisan cheerleading for Democrats, NBC News did a surprisingly fair story about Wintrich:

 

At the LGBT for Trump event Milo Yiannopoulos hosted during the Republican National Convention, I briefly met Wintrich. Liberals have a habit of assuming all gay people are Democrats, the same way they assume all women, all black people, all Hispanics and all union members are Democrats. However, the Republicans are a party of ideas, and there is nothing about the ideas of economic freedom, national security and social conservatism that puts them off-limits to any group. The common liberal belief that all gay people are necessarily “oppressed” by social conservatism, for example, ignores the kind of a live-and-let–live attitude that most conservatives have toward what used to be euphemistically called “alternative lifestyles.” The Bible-believing Southern Baptist in Oklahoma isn’t interested in using federal authority to “impose his morals” on gay people in New York or San Francisco, but he resents very much the way liberals want to use federal authority to impose their morals on his community in suburban Tulsa. This is how the “Bake Me a Cake” issue arises, with militant gay activists as cultural bullies, and this in turn involves the Compulsory Approval Doctrine:

As a result of Supreme Court decisions . . . homosexuality has now gained the status of a constitutional right, which means that disapproval of [homosexual behavior] is effectively prohibited. This new dispensation, which we might call the Compulsory Approval Doctrine, has the consequence of abolishing religious liberty. “Marriage equality” requires universal recognition of same-sex unions. Woe be unto the baker who, for religious reasons, refuses to provide a cake or the florist who refuses to provide flowers for a gay wedding.

Posted in America | Comments Off on A Young Gay Trump Supporter Confronts the ‘Politics of Personal Destruction’

A Berkeley sociologist made some tea party friends — and wrote a condescending book about them

Carlos Lozada writes for the Washington Post:

Review of “Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right” by Arlie Russell Hochschild

Hochschild made 10 trips to southwestern Louisiana from 2011 to 2016, extended forays away from her perch at the University of California at Berkeley, to delve into her “keen interest in how life feels to people on the right — that is, in the emotion that underlies politics. To understand their emotions,” she writes, “I had to imagine myself in their shoes.” She interviewed some 60 people, including 40 professed tea party supporters, visiting their homes, communities and workplaces. It is the same technique Hochschild employed in “The Second Shift” (1989), a well-reviewed look at how couples manage duties at home when both work outside of it. In this case, however, Hochschild arrives with so many preconceived ideas that they undercut the insight she claims to desire.

Hochschild preps for her conservative immersion by reading “Atlas Shrugged,” because we know tea party types are into that. “If Ayn Rand appealed to them, I imagined, they’d probably be pretty selfish, tough, cold people, and I prepared for the worst,” this acclaimed sociologist writes. “But I was thankful to discover many warm, open people who were deeply charitable to those around them.”

When she lands in Louisiana, Hochschild realizes, “I was definitely not in Berkeley, California. . . . No New York Times at the newsstand, almost no organic produce in grocery stores or farmers’ markets, no foreign films in movie houses, few small cars, fewer petite sizes in clothing stores, fewer pedestrians speaking foreign languages into cell phones — indeed, fewer pedestrians. There were fewer yellow Labradors and more pit bulls and bulldogs. Forget bicycle lanes, color-coded recycling bins, or solar panels on roofs. In some cafes, virtually everything on the menu was fried.”

Dear God, no yellow Labs or solar panels? How do you live?

Posted in America | Comments Off on A Berkeley sociologist made some tea party friends — and wrote a condescending book about them