* So lesbians are even dumber than we supposed–and dangerous to themselves and others.
Funny, it was gay men’s mental instability that most people worried about throughout history and today, what with the high propensity for impulsive behavior and mob violence and sociopathy (e.g. Ernest Rohm, the Stonewall Riots after Judy Garland died, the AIDS partner trading).
But lesbians were viewed as benignly mentally disabled and rather laughable. They’d go off in the woods all man-hating and either disappear on some tiny commune or come back for their meds and get committed.
But now we’re having major problems where lesbians, for political reasons, are having children, and their mental deficiencies are going to be visited on innocent children—such as their inability to tell obvious scams from a mile away, or their inability to choose stable genetic fathers for their children. This does not bode well.
* No, I’m not sympathetic to families that use donors.
Amazing what that Catholic church religion stuff would prevent. Following it leads to a better, more prudent life, one that even bottom-half-of-bell-curvers could undertand. Go to church and be thankful for what you have, apologize for what you’ve done wrong, help those less fortunate, stay married and raise your own children, take care of your parents and grandparents in their old age, don’t murder or steal, don’t sleep around. And, choose to mate with someone who also does these things, as evidenced by their participation in same church.
Mirabile dictu! You do these things prevent you from needing schizophrenic sperm donors, prevent you from aborting your own offspring when you are young and healthy enough to have babies, prevent you from shacking up with some idiot who rapes or murders your children while you go find a new honey, prevents you from wasting your money gambling, drinking, whoring, stops you from taking out nondoc loans for homes 7 times your earnings, etc. Etc. Etc.
To this issue of lesbian eugenics: who except a) the most vain, narcissistic, stupid men who can’t work out the possible implications of random multiple daddyhood to their future emotional or financial well-being would donate sperm? Answer: men so barely hanging on to a normal life right now that they were driven by money or psychosis. But I’m sure that’s profiling.
Posted inHomosexuality|Comments Off on Great Moments In Lesbian Eugenics
* So Presas kill 2,582 times more per capita than labs.
For some extreme human disparities, blacks in Chicago were 45 times more likely to be arrested for burglary than Asians. In New York City, blacks were 98 times more likely to be arrested than whites for “shooting.” Baltimore residents commit murder at 71 times the rate of Japanese. Baltimoreans, however, are peaceful compared to Central Americans, who have several cities with more than 3 times the Baltimore murder rate (and 200x times the Japanese rate).
From 1986 to 2012, 676,776 immigrants from murder champion El Salvador came to the United States. The country has a population of 6.3 million, indicating the United States imported about 11% of murder-champion El Salvador’s population.
During the same period, 172,000 Japanese immigrated to the United States, meaning the United States imported 0.14% of Japan’s population of 127 million. In summary, a Salvadorean is about 200 fold more likely to murder someone than a Japanese, and a Salvadorean is also about 80 fold more likely to become an immigrant to the United States.
Murder-champion El Salvador is one of several wonderful countries full of great people that get special immigration treatment called “Temporary Protected Status.” Some of those other countries are Haiti, Honduras, Somalia, Yemen, Syria, and South Sudan. People from TPS countries can come illegally and receive work permits, and are not subject to deportation. The “temporary” part of TPS is kind of a joke. Honduras has been on the TPS list since 1998. Resident of Japan do not get these privileges, and often have to deal with a lot of red tape before they can work in the United States.
* Gee, it’s almost as if certain subgroups of a species can have different evolutionary histories, and therefore different genetically encoded behaviours. *Brain-chip buzzes* I mean, I blame systemic structures of oppression against pitbulls and labrador-privilege. No other explanation is possible.
I’ve always found it amusing when middle class blue-pillers in my own homeland go on like raving Himmlerites about purity of the line and blood etc. when discussing their expensive inbred animals, but are quite incapable of applying the same line of thought to, well I’ll leave it there.
* Considering that many pit bulls are poorly trained, socialized, and encouraged to be aggressive, to the extent they receive any attention at all – just like their owners – this isn’t at all surprising When I lived in a nearly all-black DC neighborhood, with a single exception it was the only breed of dog any of the black neighborhood residents owned. They were mostly left in the yard by themselves most of the time unless taken for a stroll around the area to show off, and I don’t recall any being able to follow even rudimentary commands like “sit” or “heel.”
Some people argue that they aren’t really any worse than other breeds and perhaps that’s true if they have responsible owners, but in my observations they are often owned by people who don’t value them as companions but as accessories to their gangsta image.
* In my experience, which has included having my dog mauled on a public street by a neighbor’s pit bull, the owners are drug dealers or society’s discontents who want a guard dog to alert them to strangers and more especially the Law. Owning a pit bull is a badge or mark of membership for them.
When my dog was attacked by an unrestrained pit bull my wife pepper sprayed it (which caused it to release its death grip on my dog’s neck) simultaneously I grabbed it by its hind leg and began spinning it in giant circles like a kid does with a bucket filled with water (like the water, the pit bull’s head stays in its place i.e. away from your hand). At the peak of a whirl, I let it go. It flew about thirty feet, landed in a pile, righted itself, oriented itself and turned to renew its attack. These things are relentless. Luckily, the owner with kids in tow had showed up by then and managed to subdue it. Ever since then I have carried my legally licensed concealed pistol when walking the dog. Next pit bull that attacks me, my wife or dog gets shot. This attack wasn’t the first. The first time, my dog bolted in retreat and jerked my wife backward so that she fell hindmost into a ditch. The police are indifferent. There is no law against a dog killing another dog in my state. To settle, an aggrieved owner must pursue justice on their own initiative through civil courts. Only if the dog bites you do the police take action.
* An ironic twist is as the blank slate denied the existence of impulsively violent genetics in humans the people in the areas effected by all the impulsively violent human genetics introduced into their previously safe environment in turn denied the blank slate and physically bred scarier versions of scary dogs.
And the media refusing to admit dogs can be bred for aggression is necessary to maintain the blank slate lie.
We are living in a civilization poisoned by lies.
* It would be interesting to discover what percentage of the pitbull problems are the result of their genes, and what percentage is the result of their so often being the property of criminal scum.
* “Pit Bull” is a lot like “assault rifle”: it’s a term people use to describe something they find scary-looking, regardless of the actual mechanism/genetics. Dogs that commit fatal attacks generally don’t have AKC papers or genetic tests. Dogs labeled “pit bull” are usually mixes or other breeds entirely (Cane Corso, AmStaff, Boxer, etc.) So it’s hard to draw conclusions about the behavioral genetics of specific breeds from that data.
The other major confound is that dog breeds aren’t randomly distributed among owners, so it’s very difficult to control for the environment in which the dog was raised. Put another way: the problem may not be the “pit bulls” themselves, but the fact that “pit bulls” tend to appeal to the kind of people who become bad owners.
Put another way: The data may simply reflect an a-priori assumption that “pit bulls” are dangerous. So jerks who like the idea of having a dangerous dog tend to get pit bulls (and train them to be dangerous). And dogs that are involved in violent incidents are likely to be labeled “pit bulls” regardless of actual genetics.
* There’s a lot of denial involved with this subject. Every time there’s a story about some pitbull-mix type dog suddenly snapping and killing someone’s child the comments section has people stating the breed is wonderful and friendly, placing the blame with the owners. Partly true but numbers are numbers. So why take a chance at all with the breed? They’re not that attractive. Around here the people with them are just the shady drug dealer petty criminal looking types. There’s no need for them for the average person who just wants a companion pet.
* For some reason, most straight women and especially nurturing type women do not have what it takes to make a dog know its place in the home. The only man who would not naturally understand physical pecking orders would be someone who was home-schooled.
A dog that thinks it is the boss, or does not know it is going to get a severe “correction” the moment it looks the wrong way at your kids, is as dangerous as a loaded weapon. The warning signs are predictable if you know what to look for as well. The problem is, a lot of people don’t. That dog that is growling as your kids try and take its toy away? Serious dominance hierarchy problems.
This is more going to be a problem with naturally dominant breeds of dogs. And with such dogs, they will not know to obey properly until you start controlling their life and issuing corrections that are strong enough to cause a yelp. Of course, doing so is going to cause anyone mildly SJWish in nature to be triggered. They anthropomorphize the dog, and do not try and understand the dog on its own merits.
Unfortunately a log of (most?) dog schools don’t seem to teach the pack structure thing, and they try and do everything with positive training and with limp-wristed negative training.
By and large women, especially city women don’t understand “tough love” and that sometimes a little viciousness and cruelty is warranted in life. Civilization brings effeteness. That is something that can be said for farm-women types, they are generally not this way.
* When my son was a toddler, he got knocked over by an extremely affectionate pit bull who stood astride him while he giggled on the ground. On one level, it was a charming scene, and no harm came to him, but you can bet that I got right in there to extricate him. He looked an awful lot like prey at that moment, and it would have been a nightmare if her kill switch had flipped at that moment.
Here in Far North Portlandia, there are tons of pit bull blends in shelters, and we’re a very SWPL town, so the ones I’ve met tend to be friendly and well-socialized. But the kill switch is always in the back of my mind.
* My mother owns a pit bull she raised from a puppy, and it seems to straddle the lumpy couch potato/assault weapon line pretty well. She told me once a vibrant youf tried kicking in the door to her house in an apparent home invasion attempt and wasn’t expecting an 80lb missile to maul him when the door flew open. When the police showed up she was able to reach over and grab him and he let go when she said so. This was after five minutes of mauling though IDK if maybe he was tired of his new toy or what.
Mind you, this was a few years ago and other than that incident he seems to have gone right back to a lumpy couch potato who gets bossed around by two shih tzus. Your results may vary but I know he was raised well so there certainly is a nurture component.
However I had an experience similar to an above poster where I was out walking the dog one night and two white trash youths set their dog on mine and cheered him up to the point my dog (what we thought was a chow/rott cross but turned out to be a Tibetan mastiff) disembowled theirs in the middle of the street.
* America will continue have this tragic carnage until:
1) it finally owns up to its centuries long oppression and degradation of pit bulls.
2) Abolishes every disgraceful form of institutional Breedism ( e. g. denial of or higher rates for Homeowners Insurance for Pit Bull households ) that blights this nation founded on equality for all.
3) Require that Labradors be required to attend Labrador Privilege Awareness training sessions.
4) Finally have sufficient decency to address the national disgrace of Pit Bull over-incarceration in the nation’s Dog pounds!
5) And have sufficient honesty and humility to admit that The War On Bites was Breedist motivated and has been a spectacular failure.
* It’s not an accident that Americans have allowed a violent dog to spread all over a society where we no longer believe in culling the genes of violent humans. If people are frightened of each other, they’ll go out and get a dangerous dog. Blacks love owning pits because they live close to other blacks who are insanely violent. If we executed everyone in this country who had ever committed a felony with the vigor of a Victorian hanging judge, our country would be as safe as Switzerland. If you want to protect your society, you have to snip off the gene lines of criminal families.
* Pit bull ownership is the inverse of the Social Justice Warrior’s virtue signaling.
* I am glad to see Steve writing about pitbulls. They are a dangerous breed often owned by ghetto people. The statistics are correct, but they don’t show the sheer stupidity of ownership.
Pitbulls have been outlawed in some states, and I think they should be everywhere.
I do not stay this lightly. I grew up from age 10 with a German shepherd. Born to our family dog, he grew up with me. Together, we attended “obedience training,” which is as much training for the human as the dog.
My dog was my best friend for 15 years. Together, we traveled the United States, climbing mountains and hiking famous trails. Never did he bark at, growl at, or threaten a human being. He was too smart and well-trained for that — even though he would have killed to protect me.
Pitbull owners are morons. This is a biodiversity issue. The breed is idiotic, bred to fight and kill, but unpredictable and stupid. Pitbulls are useless. Get rid of them as fast as you can.
* Low IQ idiots walking their pitbulls is one of many reasons not to live in a poor neighborhood. It is also one of many reasons to stop all low IQ and third world immigration. You basically only see young male hispanics with vicious breed dogs, never something cute, friendly, or interesting to look at. A well kept and beautiful rare breed dog brightens everyone day who sees it out walking and is always a white or asian owner.
* So a guy pops in to a biker bar and asks, “Who owns the pit bull chained up outside?” A nasty looking dude looks at the guy and says. “I do. Do you have a problem with that?’ The first guy replies, “Actually, I don’t have a problem, but you do. My dog just killed your dog.” The biker jumps off his barstool and screams, “Killed my dog? What type of dog do you have?” The first guy backs up a bit and answers ” A Chihuahua.” The biker looks at him and says, ” How the f*ck did a Chihuahua kill my pit bull?” The first guy turns to run and says over his shoulder…..”I think it got caught in his throat.”
* Not a lot of African Americans and Hispanics like golden retrievers, because they see them as a White people dog and most NAMs do not want to culturally assimilate into Whiteness a.k.a mainstream American culture.
* HBD theories probably would not exist if it weren’t for the huge, incontrovertible body of evidence in the animal and plant worlds that supports racial diversities in form and substance. Race apparently describes separations existing between the family or line, and the specie levels. The question isn’t whether pit bulls are innately more physically aggressive than most other races of dog. Obviously they are, for these qualities were selected through generations of careful and not so careful breeding.
The question is whether these aggressive tendencies can override the fundamental predisposition toward pack bonding. Almost any dog can be trained, using immediate, firm, and consistent discipline, to tolerate other creatures, even cats and chickens. I doubt that even pit bulls are beyond redemption in this regard. The limiting factor is the attention and careful discipline that good behavior may require for an extra-aggressive individual. I suspect it is frequently lacking.
On the other hand, although the number of pit bulls who have maimed or killed a human being is almost certainly negligible relative to the pit population, this fact will be of no consolation to the families of the dead.
Posted inCrime, HBD|Comments Off on Pitbulls Account for Half of Dog Fatalities
Comment: The American people must choose: Who will be the American people?
This was a critical question before the Civil War. The USA was created by people from Great Britain. But the plutocrats who owned plantations wanted something more. They got rich from an underclass of slave workers brought from Africa. They wanted to grow the underclass and spread it across the continent.
Most voters opposed the plutocrats and wanted slavery contained, to be abolished later. But both major parties favored the plutocrats. The frustrated voters turned out the incumbent party in every presidential election from 1840 through 1852. Finally desperate voters created a 3rd party specifically to contain slavery (Free Soil) for the 1848 election. But the plutocrats still got what they wanted, including the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, and after the next election the Kansas-Nebraska act of 1854. The eventual resolution was war.
Now again the plutocrats want to grow their profits by growing a low-paid American underclass, this time mainly from Latin America. Again most voters want this practice contained, but both parties favor the plutocrats. That didn’t work in the 1850s and it won’t work now.
Posted inAmerica|Comments Off on Who Will Be The American People?
UK Government concerned too many people could be trying anal sex
The Government is concerned that increasing numbers of young people are trying anal sex, according to an official consultation.
Officials at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport are baffled at the increased popularity of the act despite apparent “research” suggesting it is not pleasurable for women.
The warning is included in a consultation document issued by the Department about plans to further restrict access to online pornography. It argues that young people are trying anal sex as a result of having viewed pornography, and that this is an unwelcome development.
“Many people worry that young people will come to expect their real life sexual experiences to mirror what they or their peers see in pornography, which often features ambiguous depictions of consent, submissive female stereotypes and unrealistic scenarios,” the consultation reads.
“There is also a question about the effect of pornography on ‘unwanted sex’ – for instance more young people are engaging in anal intercourse than ever before despite research which suggests that it is often not seen as a pleasurable activity for young women.
“While the increase in anal sex cannot be attributed directly to pornography consumption, it does feature in a large percentage of mainstream pornography (for example, one content analysis found it featured in 56% of sex scenes).”
The consultation suggests that restricting access to pornography might reduce the numbers of people trying anal sex.
Posted inSex|Comments Off on What’s The Correct Amount Of Sodomy?
A brown (Indian) dean sexually harasses a brown (AA? Indian? Other?) assistant at Berkeley; he is given a slap on the wrist by a brown (AA) provost; said provost is, finally, from general embarrassment, pushed out of his position.
And the brown provost is none other than Claude Steele, famous or infamous for his “discovery” of stereotype threat. (Given the failure to replicate stereotype threat, who can really believe now that his studies were entirely on the up-and-up?)
You could win Oppression Bingo with this story.
Posted inDiversity|Comments Off on When The Fringes Fray All The Way Down
1/ This comedian will get great publicity (at the cost of a slap on the wrist)
2/ Other jealous comedians (and comedians can get plenty jealous-remember the anti-Leno mess) will copy him.
3/ People will actually hear about a German comedian.
4/ There’s proof that the German fastidiousness about rules still remains. Paleos and HBD’ers should be happy.
* Countries that have genuinely friendly, or at least non-adversarial relations, with each other have no need for laws like these. George W. Bush was relentlessly parodied, criticized and made fun of in foreign countries and no one thought to prosecute the comediens. If a statement was made that defames Erdogan personally, the civil courts of Germany are open to him. This type of a law might be useful only for countries on the ragged edge of war, where a personal insult might push an adversary over the edge, but a prosecution could defuse things until diplomacy resolves the underlying conflict or war begins (at which point insulting the enemy leader is encouraged). Perceived personal insults were a part of the chain of events leading up to the Franco-Prussian War of 1870, although I don’t remember the precise circumstances–I think that Bismarck edited a French diplomatic communication to make it appear more insulting to the King of Prussia than it actually was intended to be.
A frank conversation about the Zeitgeist? Probably not–the inability to have such a conversation is an essential part of the Zeitgeist. The rot in western Europe, the U.S. and Canada goes so deep that probably only a cataclysm will change it.
* Am I the only one noticing how petty this makes Erdogan look? Throwing a tantrum over what some B-list comedian said about him in a country 1,000 miles away? I simply can’t imagine being the dictator of a major country and getting upset over what civilians in other countries say about me. What a pitiful child Erdogan is.
* The bigger question is how the German constitutional democracy has allowed one person to have such unfettered power.
* Never put childless women in charge of anything.
* Merkel is totally overrated. She basically screwed up every major policy issue in which her initiative was required (Energy reform, Eurocrisis, Greek crisis, refugees, banking crisis, Ukraine, Syria). Apart from that she lived off the labor-market reforms instituted by Schröder, an industry which was humming along, the credit expansion of the early EU years, and a fawning media landscape.
Now that issues are becoming trickier, and require initiative and even force, she flails and intuitively places herself and the country into potential blackmail situations, be it the ECB, the banks, Greece or now the refugee issue and Turkey.
There are nefarious issues such as her rumored Stasi activities, her ancestry and true religious loyalty (Bnei Brith masonry), but apart from that the media have been hyping her as an example of powerful female leadership. Many career women, riding the quota bus, were buying into this. But now her sheer incompetence and cowardice is becoming an embarrassment and security risk for ordinary Germans and Europeans, many of whom are disgusted with this woman.
* What’s becoming even more obvious is that Merkel has a hard time admitting she made a mistake. That’s a very German trait, but I think especially powerful women fail in this area, since they regard admittance of failure as a sign of weakness, which has always been the argument against letting women run important public offices. Leadership weakness is especially frowned upon in Germany.
Merkel was not able to admit that inviting the world was a bad idea, and in order to fix it along back channels, as a last resort after the EU solution failed, she tried to make a deal with Erdogan, who was one of the prime instigators of this situation. Of course that could only go south, but it shows how desperate she was. Now she got into the next mess, and again is not able to admit her mistake, so she passes the buck onto the courts, which she otherwise does not take particularly seriously.
The media has been a foul weapon in the hands of operators such as Erdogan, Soros and the immigration lobby.
* All the talk these days is that Germany has some sort of long, deep bond with Turkey, an ancient bond of ‘blood and affection’.
This is pure nonsense.
Mass Turkish immigration into Germany only started in the mid 1960s. After the mass immigration of Italians, Greeks, Yugoslavs etc. Yes, for a brief period, 1914-18 the German Empire had a tactical alliance with the Ottoman Empire. But apart from that Turkey to Germany is a foreign country as a foreign country can be. No ties of blood, history, culture, language, religion etc – or even geographic border.
It is central and eastern Europe where Germany has or had its destiny. Unfortunately, the Germans were – and still are – very fond of crapping on this region from a great height from time to time.
Indeed, Turk ‘gadtarbeiters’ only came because Poles were unobtainable, back in the day.
* I’m somewhat conflicted about this…Böhmermann is a narcisstic piece of **it, totally on board with the mass immigration project and in general part of the left-leaning German mainstream (apart from Erdogan, other bogeymen for him are Donald Trump, Wladimir Putin, Marine Le Pen, Victor Orban, Poland’s Beate Szydlo and Pim Fortuyn…though I assume he meant Wilders by that since Fortuyn, as we know, was murdered by a leftie activist in 2002). His “satire” of Erdogan was also vulgar and almost without political content…what’s the point in making absurd accusations up about Erdogan like “watches child porn, f**ks goats, goes to gang bang parties” when you’re too cowardly to face the real issue…that Erdogan is a nasty anti-Western demagogue who combines Islamism with Turkish ultra-nationalism, and that a very large percentage of Turks are totally fine with this. Also, in general I do think it’s problematic when some “satirist” who’s employed by a quasi-state broadcasting agency like Germany’s ZDF (financed by a licence fee that is obligatory for all German households…you can go to prison if you refuse to pay) attacks foreign heads of state in such a vulgar manner.
So Merkel’s decision by itself could be justifiable. But the speech the woman gave, was disgusting with its bizarre pro-Turkish platitudes…Turkey is our “friend and partner”, NATO ally and prospective EU member, and there are close ties between the countries because of millions of Turks living in Germany…when an honest assessment would be that large-scale Turkish immigration to Germany was a costly mistake and that Turkey is a deeply unpleasant country with a history extending to the present of persecuting minorities and causing trouble in its neighbourhood (think Cyprus, now Syria), and that a large percentage of its population are Islamists and/or ultra-nationalists. It was an embarrassing display…typical German politician cringe mode.
* Böhmermann is from a clique of new comedians who do 70% political lecturing about how dumb, ridiculous and evil racist are and 30% other comedy. It is quite ironical that somebody who´s mane concern is bashing european racists for months and years without any threatening reaction one time makes fun of a non-European muslim and now has to hide, stop his show in TV etc. because serious threats of violence. Because in the end islamists and antiracists have elements in among them who are willing and able to enforce islamist and antiracist aims by violence.
It is exactly this asymmetry which makes people voting for right-wing parties in the first place. Böhmermann now experiences this asymmetry.
* Why does Europe allow itself to be colonized by millions of Muslim men? Why after 13 centuries of resistance does it succumb now?
Imagine that Europe was one person, and the the total war it suffered in 1914 was a life-threatening cancer. Europe went into remission for two decades and then the cancer recurred. In desperation, Europe chose a kind of chemotherapy which prevented another war by suppressing national pride, tradition and self-defense. But those things were Europe’s immune system, and an immunosuppressed patient cannot mount a response to invading bacterial cells. That is why Europe now cannot defend itself from being colonized by millions of Muslim men.
Posted inGermany|Comments Off on Reuters: Germany’s Merkel Criticized for Allowing Prosecution of Comedian Who Mocked Erdogan
* The Princeton Offense was the same as the offense used in the film Hoosiers whenever the Hoosiers didn’t have star Jimmy Chitwood on the floor: pass-pass-pass until the shot clock was down to 2 seconds and then have the best free shooter take the shot. The point was to whittle the game clock down and slow the pace down so your team didn’t get run ragged by a leaping, jumping, hard-sprinting team with fast breaks.
Basically, the strategy is for teams with less athletic players who are disciplined enough to follow orders and not selfish. In other words, it’s a strategy for non-blacks who are tall and willing to work hard.
* Did you ever hear the story of what happened to Mullin as a rookie with the Warriors in ’85? He had a habit of working on his jumper 2-3 hrs. before a game. One of the black starters told him, “don’t do that anymore, man, it makes the rest of us look bad.” Naturally, the sportswriter who related the story didn’t mention a name. My money’s on Joe Barry Carroll.
* David Stern has retired. Another Jew, Adam Silver, has taken control.
Surprised?
Coincidence?
* Sports fans ARE crazy.
Everything else in America is fixed. Politics, college admittances, diet/nutrition scams, fake meritocracy everywhere, cartel prices across the board for everyday items, pseudo-science global warming, all government data, all Wall Street data etc. It’s all fudged.
But the sports fans still think the big games (hundreds of millions on the line) are real.
Wake up!
* I thought at the time that the NBA missed an opportunity with Lin. They should have encouraged the Knicks to keep him in New York and to build a team around him, ideally one that was more diverse than typical. One of the interesting things about the NBA in the 1980s was that it had a mostly white team in the Celtics; why not make the Knicks at least a mostly non-black team? Imagine if they had brought in the Israeli player along with Lin and maybe Kevin Love… that could have been a boon for the NBA. Heck, my mother started watching the Knicks during Linsanity. She hasn’t watched basketball since.
* The immigrant groups in Los Angeles who have the lowest rate of residential segregation from White Americans is Armenians and Persians. If you use the extremely broad definition of “Asian”, than I guess you could use them as examples of “Asians” who integrate well with Whites. Not many Persians and Armenians are moving to The San Gabriel Valley.
* Has anyone ever pointed out that the economics concept of “comparative advantage” applies to sports?
For example, let’s assume that blacks had the exact same natural pitching ability as whites, but have somewhat greater natural ability to steal bases and run down fly balls in the outfield. Then blacks would have an absolute advantage at playing the outfield, but whites would have a comparative advantage at pitching, because there would be less demand for their outfielding skills.
Or lets assume that blacks have the exact same natural ability as whites at playing baseball, but MUCH greater natural ability than whites, on average, at basketball and football. Whites would then have a comparative advantage for baseball, because their skills in other sports are less in demand.
In those cases, there would be no reason to expect baseball to have the same proportion of blacks as the general population, nor for pitching to have the same proportion of blacks as baseball on the whole.
* Let’s cut to the chase here: the love and passion for Everything is passed from father to son. Work habits, sports, attitudes, hobbies, it all comes from Dad, both good and bad. If he’s absent then the son has to scramble to figure out who he really is and what his calling in life should be. With Dad around it’s much easier on the boy. It’s also much easier for Mom to understand her son.
When I hear people making excuses for single motherhood I can only shake my head. Just today a man in his 60′s was telling me about his own father. That influence and relationship goes on forever.
Posted inBasketball|Comments Off on The Princeton Offense
Leftists plans for more racial miscegenation through mass immigration and open borders has backfired. It has actually resulted in less racial miscegenation. The more Asians are imported into The U.S, the less they racially mix with Whites.
If you step foot in New York City or California, White/Asian couples are not really common. Hollywood films greatly overexaggerate the frequency of such couples. It doesn’t match reality.
If you are out & about in the streets of NYC, S.F, S.D, Sactown, L.A, etc you can easily go an entire day without seeing a single Asian/White couple. There is no guarantee you will see at least 1 Asian/White couple before the day is over. Even Steve Sailer a native Angeleno can confirm what I say. It’s common to go 48 or 72 hours without seeing such couples on the streets.
Posted inAsians|Comments Off on White-Asian Couples Decreasing
"This guy knows all the gossip, the ins and outs, the lashon hara of the Orthodox world. He’s an [expert] in... all the inner workings of the Orthodox world." (Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff)
