Vikings

* The closest I can find today to living out a Jane Austen novel is in Orthodox Judaism. Standards and in-group solidarity make life more exciting.

* I’ve been watching the TV show Vikings and I am disturbed by the lack of diversity. Just think how much more effective these raiding parties would have been if they had only contained some Jews, sodomites, trannies, Mexicans, Muslims, blacks, and Orientals.

Lilian: I’m sure in today’s PC world, minority actors have to be cast as Vikings or else be labeled as “racist”.

Christoph Donnellan I’m sure they dealt with Jewish merchants and slave traders on occasion in their journeys.

Alex Trivunovic Heimdal was known as the ‘White God’ so, naturally, he’s black in the ‘Thor’ films.

Chaim Amalek Perhaps the Disney Company will do an animated version of this. Trust me, if they do, it will be diverse as you wish.

Wally Wharton I am SICK of us Norwegians being portrayed as Nordic superior gods!! The men— buffed, fantastic warriors, skillful seamen, expert navigators and craftsmen WAY ahead of their time!! And then there’s the disgraceful way the entertainment industry portrays Nordic women— blonde, buxom, resourceful and eager to mate!! Right now I’m just so ashamed of my heritage…….

Michael Fumento One black, one white, one blonde. The Mod Vikings. I want a blonde to “attend” my funeral. If you get my, er, drift.

* I’ve been reading the Bible and I am disturbed by the horrible amount of racism in it. I constantly see stories about families making sure their son marries a woman from the right tribe. What was wrong with the perfectly nice Mexican-type ladies lying around Mesopatamia and hoping to move up in status? Isn’t in-group marriage a form of bigotry? We’re all God’s kids, right?

* How can we get back to the healthy society of the Victorian era? I’ve about had it with the trannies and the gay marriage and the miscegenation.

Lilian: In the Victorian era, a lady would never leave her home without a chaperone. To do so would mean she would be disgraced. Good times! I want a chaperone to ensure I remain a good girl. I can’t rely on my own female emotions.

Matt: Miscegenation is by far the worst.

Pray for conflict and polarization, to sow the seeds of rebellion.

Steve: Victorian society was way worse than anything that exists in the Western World today. For instance, many married lower-class women were forced to become prostitutes just to survive. It was sick and cruel beyond imagining. Pick up a copy of “London Labour and the London Poor” and start reading on any page. I’m sure Victorian England was a great place and time to live if you were a member of the upper classes, but if you were part of the majority of working-class or poor, life would have been pretty grim.

Matt: Is England really better today? What dignity will our people have when white children are seen as the other, or the wog? The invasion of non-whites is worse than the threat of any ordinary conquest, because there will be no way to recover. England will be lost forever.

Chaim Amalek: The growth in the number of words in the NY Times devoted to the plight of men who like to wear woman’s clothes over the past ten years is astonishing. “Transgendered” is the new Black.

I say racial impurity is not per se a bad thing. It all depends on whose blood gets added to the mix. Who can deny that Sammy Davis was a big win for our team?

Conservative Judaism used to be a big deal in America. Big temples. Fancy dinners. Women sitting next to men, and dressed to the nines. And I understand they all made a Haj to the Catskills every year to hear Shecky Green tell Jew-Jokes where the goyim would not be able to hear them. Those were the days…

I would not say that they are “left wing.” Rather, the heart often goes where the rabbis wish it did not. There just are too many potential goyishe partners in America for endogamy to prevail where choice is a possibility.

Luke: Let all the Christian white Swedish women come here (Australia, USA, Britain) if they want, but not the Muslims who live in Sweden.

Posted in Personal, Race | Comments Off on Vikings

Does Anyone Like You?

Sitting in shul davening Friday night, a friend leaned over to me and said, “I’m the only person in this room who likes you.”

I shot back: “You’ve been davening here for years and how many Shabbos meals invites have you had? One. So nobody likes you either, and you sponsor many programs. I sponsor nothing and I have a blog. So what’s your excuse?”

A few minutes later, I was able to locate somebody else in the room who was willing to testify, under duress, that he liked me too.

Posted in Personal, Synagogue | Comments Off on Does Anyone Like You?

Give Me What I Deserve In The Next Life

When God judges me after I die, I hope He gives me what I deserve. I think most Jews have this attitude, but I’ve never met a Christian with this belief. They seem to all believe that they are horrible sinners.

I’ve done a lot of lousy stuff in my life, but nothing that I feel would condemn me to eternally burning hell fire. I want to get what I deserve. I want to feel all the needless pain I’ve dished out to others and I want to feel the joy I’ve brought them. I don’t want some divine savior on a cross to absorb all of my sin. I don’t want grace from God. I just want a fair accounting. I’ve always paid my taxes honestly and that’s what I want for my soul.

Bring it on, Lord, when my times comes.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on Give Me What I Deserve In The Next Life

Would I Have Made A Good Spy?

Watching the TV show, The Americans, which many critics regard as the best show on now, I put myself in the place of the protagonists, the Russian spies. Pretty much everything I watch I put myself in the place of the protagonist. Perhaps that is a symptom of narcissism?

As a narcissist, I find it easy to identify with the spies who use everybody to get their group needs. They have little conscience about using and disposing of people.

As a narcissist, I have to confess that I have often acted the same way. In much of my love life, it’s been all about how can I meet my needs with insufficient regard for the well-being of my partners. As a reporter, I preferred to deal with industries I had contempt for because then I didn’t worry about the welfare of the people I was writing about. I could see them more as sources of information and objects for writing.

My experiences, however, as opposed to the theory I just laid out, were messy. I felt myself developing way too much empathy for comfort at times and had to force it down deep to write what I thought was important but hurtful.

It’s a relief for some of us to have a transcendent cause to dedicate ourselves to because then we can worry less about those we trample in our pursuit of righteousness.

There’s something that gets twisted when you grow up those first few years without a mother’s love.

Posted in Narcissism | Comments Off on Would I Have Made A Good Spy?

Exodus: Gods & Kings

This Ridley Scott movie is OK. It touches on group conflict.

Thirty six hundreds years ago, the Egyptians were faced with a rapidly growing minority in the land who could not be assimilated. Just think of America with many Mexican immigrants or Israel with Palestinians.

From the perspective of the welfare of Egypt, the Pharoah’s choice to enslave the Hebrews makes sense and the Pharoahs preoccupation with high Hebrew birthrates is a mark of a serious responsible leader. Demographics is destiny.

In the group conflict between Hebrews and Egyptians, tens of thousands of innocent people on both sides die.

The protagonist does not want to regard himself as a Hebrew but only comes to the realization late in life (like many Jews).

It does not seem to matter much to the outcome of the story which side was most righteous. In the end, the group most powerful and adaptive will survive and other groups will get flushed down the toilet of history.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Exodus: Gods & Kings

Jewish Activists Push Multiculturalism & Mass Immigration In Europe

Anetta Kahane says: “You have to really change the policy of immigration inside Europe. This is very important, you have to adopt the educational system and adapt all the self understanding of the states. They are not anymore only white or only Swedish or only Portuguese or only German. They are multicultural places in the world.”

I wonder if she holds the same for Israel?

Jewish activist Barbara Lerner Spectre, who operates a taxpayer funded Jewish study group in Sweden, says: “I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.”

Posted in Europe, Immigration, Jews, Whites | Comments Off on Jewish Activists Push Multiculturalism & Mass Immigration In Europe

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism

“When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all.”

“This is just as true of the man who puts “native” before the hyphen as of the man who puts German or Irish or English or French before the hyphen. Americanism is a matter of the spirit and of the soul. Our allegiance must be purely to the United States. We must unsparingly condemn any man who holds any other allegiance.”

“But if he is heartily and singly loyal to this Republic, then no matter where he was born, he is just as good an American as any one else.”

“The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English- Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian- Americans, or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality than with the other citizens of the American Republic.”

“The men who do not become Americans and nothing else are hyphenated Americans; and there ought to be no room for them in this country. The man who calls himself an American citizen and who yet shows by his actions that he is primarily the citizen of a foreign land, plays a thoroughly mischievous part in the life of our body politic. He has no place here; and the sooner he returns to the land to which he feels his real heart-allegiance, the better it will be for every good American.”

Theodore Roosevelt

Address to the Knights of Columbus
New York City- October 12th, 1915

Posted in America | Comments Off on There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism

A Jewish State Or A Democratic State?

I was struck watching interviews of Rabbi Meir Kahane about how often he talked about the conflict between a democratic Israel and a Jewish Israel. If Jews cease to be the majority in Israel, then if the country remains a democracy, it will cease to be a Jewish state.

Rabbi Kahane said to Dennis Prager in 1985: “There is a basic contradiction between Zionism and Western democracy. A Jewish state at the very minimum means a state with a majority of Jews, because only in that way can Jews solve their own destiny, be masters of their own fate. Western democracy postulates the basic axiom that it doesn’t matter who’s the majority. It doesn’t matter if you’re Jewish or non-Jewish, whoever’s the majority is it. Therefore there is a basic contradiction, since most western Jews are basically schizophrenic, with one foot inside Judaism and the other half inside western culture, and they would like to believe that Judaism is Thomas Jefferson. It isn’t.”

Posted in Israel, Jews | Comments Off on A Jewish State Or A Democratic State?

They Must Go

Rabbi Meir Kahane writes in his book They Must Go:

The analysis and proposed transfer of Arabs from Israel that I have set down are not personal views. They are certainly not political ones. This is the Jewish outlook, based on halakhah, the law as postulated in the Torah.

The removal of all Arabs who refuse to accept the exclusive, unquestioned Jewish sovereignty over Eretz Yisrael is not only logical and normal for any Jew with a modicum of an instinct for self preservation; it is also the Jewish halakhic obligation. It is important that we know this in order to realize what true “Jewishness” really dictates and in order to instill in ourselves the faith and assurance that if we do this, all the nations in the world will be incapable of harming Israel.

The Torah viewpoint on the status of non-Jews in Eretz Yisrael is part of a total viewpoint on the very nature of the Jewish people and of the Land of Israel. Of necessity, it opens up the questions: What is a Jew?Why the Land of Israel? What is the relationship of Jew to Gentiles? In the eyes of Judaism, Jewish nationalism, as such, is meaningless. What, after all, is the logic behind a separate nation, flag, parliament, defense system? Why set up barriers between people? What nonsense is the national anthem that glorifies one people that is, in essence, no different from another? Nationalism is, at best, foolish. At worst, it leads to hatred, to division, to war. There is no special meaning to the Jewish people if it is merely one more of the myriad of nations. In that case, the fate of the Jew is like the fate of the Moabite or Canaanite or Finn or Turk. The Jewish people can then exist, evolve, and die out. Its disappearance from the world scene is then as possible, and as probable, as that of all the other ancients who were Jewish contemporaries in biblical times and are long since gone.

But the Jewish people is not merely one more nation. “Though I put an end to all the nations among whom thou art scattered, but I will never put an end to thee” (Jeremiah 30:11). Israel is indestructible. It is unique, it is holy, it is the Chosen of the L-rd; it has a reason for being. Its national uniqueness is built on an idea, on an ideology, that it alone has. That is, indeed, reason to be different. The Jew is selected and obligated to be a religio-nation, commanded to obey the laws and follow the path of Torah. Through sacred covenants, first with each of the three Patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and then with the entire nation standing at Mount Sinai and listening to the voice of the Alm-ghty, the Jewish people was born: “Now therefore, if you will surely obey My voice and observe My covenant, then you shall be unique unto Me above all the nations, for all the earth is Mine. And you shall be unto Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Exodus 19:5-6).

The covenant. The Jewish people took upon itself the yoke of the L-rd, acknowledging him as G-d and observing His laws. The Alm-ghty chose them as His unique people, pledging that they would be indestructible and would live in peace and prosperity in their own land, Eretz Yisrael.

“Unto thy seed have I given this land from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the River Euphrates” (Genesis 15:18).

The land was given as a reward, as a blessing. But it is more, much more, than that. The people of Israel have more than a rightXo the land; they have an obligation. “For you shall pass over the Jordan to go in to possess the Land which the L-rd your G-d gives you, and you shall possess it and dwell therein” (Deuteronomy 11 :31).

A unique people given, uniquely, a particular land. Unlike all the other faiths that are not limited to one special country, the Jew is given a particular land and commanded to live there. And for a reason, as Moses explains: “Behold, I have taught you statutes and judgments, even as the L-rd, my G-d, commanded me, that you shall do so in the Land whither you go to possess it.” (Deuteronomy 4:5)

It is impossible to create a holy, unique people that dwells as a minority within lands that belong to others. The majority culture will infiltrate, influence, corrupt, woo, tempt, pervert. The Jew is commanded to create for himself a holy nation, and that can only be done free of others, separate, different, apart. That is why the unique Jewish nation, chosen for holiness and a unique destiny, was given a land for itself: so that it might create a unique, holy society that would be a light unto the nations who would see its example and model.

Such a state is reserved to the nation to which it was given for its particular goal and destiny. It was taken from nations – the Canaanites – in order that the Jew fulfill his obligatory destiny.

The L-rd, Creator and Proprietor of the world – all the lands are His. He took that which was His from the Canaanites and gave it to His Chosen People Israel. “And He gave them the lands of the nations and they inherited the lands of the people, so that they would observe His statutes and guard His laws …” (Psalms 105:44-45). The right of the Jewish people to the land is not based on human favors or historical residence. It is a title granted by the Builder and Owner. Clearly, it was not taken from one set of nations in order that others share it with the Jews. The land was given to serve the Jewish people so that they have a distinct, separate place in which to fulfill their obligation. There can be no others who freely live there, let alone share sovereignty and ownership. To allow such a thing is to invite both military attack and spiritual assimilation, and thus to destroy and put an end to that unique Torah society for which the Land of Israel was given to the Jews.

This is so for all non-Jews. Any grant to them of citizenship that implies ownership and a right to shape the destiny and character of the state destroys the uniqueness and entire purpose of giving the land to Israel. It invites spiritual assimilation and eventually demands for political autonomy.

How much more so for the non-Jewish residents of the land who lived there before the L-rd gave it to the Jews. Those residents refuse to recognize such a fact. They believe the land to be theirs and will dream of the day when they will regain it. To allow them to remain as proprietors, or even freely living with restrictions, is to ensure not only the general spiritual assimilation that is threatened by any large number of non-Jews, but also the threat of revanchist political and military attack.

So basic and important is this concept that as the Jews prepared to cross the Jordan into the Land of Israel, as the waters rose to enormous heights and the Children of Israel rapidly crossed to the other side, as they were in the middle of the now-dry riverbed, suddenly Joshua paused and spoke to them. What was so vital that could not wait until they had crossed safely to the other side? What had to be said now, in the middle of the Jordan, as the waters piled higher and higher?

“While still in the Jordan, Joshua said to them: Know why you are crossing the Jordan! In order that you drive out the inhabitants of the Land from before you as it is written (Numbers 33:52): ‘And you shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you.’ If you do this – it shall be good. If not – the waters shall come and inundate me and you” (Talmud, Sota 34a).

Nothing was more urgent than this message, for allowing the nations of the Land of Israel to remain there freely was to invite physical and spiritual threats, military or political efforts on the part of bitter, angry revanchist people to regain the land, spiritual and cultural assimilation, and disintegration of the uniqueness of the special society that the Jew was commanded to build.

And as the Torah clearly commanded: “And you shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you. … But if you will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you, then it shall come to pass that those which you let remain of them, shall be thorns in your eyes and thistles in your sides and shall torment you in the land wherein you dwell. And it shall be that I will do to you as I thought to do to them” (Numbers 33:52-56).

The biblical commentators are explicit: “And you shall drive out the inhabitants and then you shall inherit it, you will be able to exist in it. And if you do not, you will not be able to exist in it” (Rashi – Rabbi Shiomo Yitzchaki).

“When you shall eliminate the inhabitants of the land, then you shall be privileged to inherit the land and pass it down to your children. But if you do not eliminate them, even though you will conquer the land you will not be privileged to hand it down to your children” (Sforno – Rabbi Ovadiah ben Yaakov).

“… The verse speaks of others aside from the seven Canaanite nations…. Not only will they hold that part of the land that you did not possess, but even concerning that part which you did possess and settle in – they will distress you and say: Rise and get out …” (Ohr Ha’Chayim – Rabbi Chaim ben Atar).

And so, the Talmud tells us: “Joshua sent three messages to the inhabitants [of Canaan]. He who wishes to evacuate – let him evacuate; who wishes to make peace – let him make peace; to make war – let him make war” (Vayikra Rabah 17).

The choices are given. Either leave, or prepare for war – or make peace. The choice of “making peace” is explained by the rabbis as involving three things. To begin with, the non-Jew must agree to adopt the seven basic Noahide laws, which include prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, immorality, bloodshed, robbery, eating flesh cut from a living animal, and a positive action — adherence to social laws. Once he has done this, he has the status of a resident stranger {ger toshav) who is allowed to live in Eretz Yisrael (Talmud, Avoda Zara 64b), if he also accepts the conditions of tribute and servitude. (It should be noted that the use of the word ger [“stranger”] in the Torah refers invariably not to the non-Jewish stranger, but to the convert to Judaism.)

Biblical commentator Rabbi David Kimchi (Radak) explains (Joshua 9:7): “If they uproot idolatry and accept the seven Noahide laws, they must also pay tribute and serve Israel and be subjects under them, as it is written (Deuteronomy 20:1 1 ): They will be tribute and shall serve you.'”

Maimonides (Hilchot Mlachim 6:1 1 ) declares: “If they make peace and accept the seven Noahide laws we do not kill them for they are tributary. If they agreed to pay tribute but do not accept servitude or accepted servitude but not tribute we do not acquiesce until they have accepted both. And servitude means that they shall be humble and low and not raise their head in Israel. Rather they shall be subjects under us and not be appointed to any position over Jews ever.”

Far better than foolish humans did the Alm-ghty understand the dangers inherent in allowing a people that believed the land belonged to it to be given free and unfettered residence, let alone ownership, proprietorship, citizenship. What more natural thing than to ask to regain what it believed to be rightly its own land? And this over and above the need to create a unique and distinctly separate Torah culture that will shape the Jewish people into a holy nation. That “uniqueness” can be guaranteed only by the non-Jew’s having no sovereignty, ownership, or citizenship in the state that could allow him to shape its destiny and character. And so, concerning any non-Jew, Maimonides says: “‘Thou shall not place over thyself a stranger who is not of your brethren’ (Deuteronomy 1 7:15). Not only a king, but the prohibition is
for any authority in Israel. Not an officer in the armed forces … not even a public official in charge of the distribution of water to the fields. And there is no need to mention that a judge or chieftain shall only be from the people of Israel. … Any authority that you appoint shall only be from the midst of thy people” (Hilchot Mlachim 1:4).

The purpose is clear. The non-Jew has no share in the Land of Israel. He has no ownership, citizenship, or destiny in it. The non-Jew who wishes to live in Israel must accept basic human obligations. Then he may live in Israel as a resident stranger, but never as a citizen with any proprietary interest or with any political say, never as one who can hold any public office that will give him dominion over a Jew or a
share in the authority of the country. Accepting these conditions, he admits that the land is not his, and therefore he may live in Israel quietly, separately observing his own private life, with all religious,
economic, social, and cultural rights. Refusing this, he cannot remain.

This is Torah. This is Jewishness. Not the dishonest pseudo-“Judaism” chanted by the liberal secularists who pick and choose what “Judaism” finds favor in their eyes and who reject what their own gentilized
concepts find unacceptable. They weigh “Judaism” on the scales of their own intellectual arrogance – an arrogance, incidentally, of intense ignorance.

And if this is not only the right of Jews but their obligation, what do we fear? Why do the Jews tremble and quake before the threat of the nations? Is there no longer a G-d in Israel? Have we so lost our bearings that we do not understand the ordained historical role of the State of Israel, a role that ensures that it can never be destroyed and that no further exile from it is possible? Why is it that we do not comprehend that it is precisely our refusal to deal with the Arabs according to halakhic obligation that will bring down on our heads terrible sufferings, whereas our courage in removing them will be one of the major factors in the hurrying of the final redemption?

More than 2,500 years ago, a giant of a Philistine named Goliath strolled out to the ranks of Israel and mocked them: “I have humiliated the armies of Israel this day – give me a man that we may fight together.” No one moved. The giant was too powerful, and it was madness, suicide, to confront him.

Instead, they sat in shame and fear, as every morning and every evening — for forty days — the Philistine taunted and humiliated them.

And then came young David; untrained in war, a shepherd, coming to bring food to his brothers serving in the army. And as he stood there, Goliath emerged. David listened in fury. David waited eagerly — who
would leap up to smash the Philistine? David watched in disbelief as no one moved. All feared the power of the Gentile.

David’s wrathful words sound across the ages, as an eternal guidepost: “Who is this uncircumcised Philistine that he should humiliate the armies of the living G-d?”

David, instinctively, understood that the humiliation of Israel was, simultaneously, the humiliation of the G-d of Israel. He realized that the brazen readiness to attack and mock the Jews stemmed from a total
lack of fear and awe of the G-d of Israel. For the Philistine there was no G-d of Israel; at best He was impotent; in truth He did not exist as a divine power.

This contempt for the G-d of Israel as manifested by the humiliation of the Jews is Hillul Hashem, the desecration of the name of the L-rd. Rejection of Jewish rights and power, the contemptuous refusal to
recognize Jewish sovereignty, threats against the Jew and his land, all are signs of disregard and contempt for the G-d of the Jews. “The degradation of Israel is the desecration of the name of the L-rd”
(Rashi, Ezekiel 39:7).

All this David understood, and he understood, too, that Hillul Hashem dare not be countenanced: it must be erased. There is no room for fear, because the entire reason for Jewish being is Kiddush Hashem, to
sanctify the name of the L-rd and thus persuade the world to follow Him.

And so, young David went out to face the giant Philistine, veteran warrior and professional soldier, “whose height was six cubits and a span … a helmet of copper upon his head … armed with a coat of mail … and the staff of his spear was like a weaver’s beam, and his spear’s head weighed six hundred shekels of iron. …” And David spoke to him before he killed him, saying: “Thou comest to me with a sword and a spear and a shield; but I come to thee in the name of the L-rd of H-sts, the G-d of the armies of Israel, whom thou hast humiliated.

“This day will the L-rd deliver thee into my hand, and I will smite thee and take thy head from thee … that all the earth may know that there is a G-d in Israel”

And David slew him and took his head from him and the earth – and the Jews – knew that there was a G-d in Israel.

What is wrong with us? Who blinded us and blocked from our memories the existence and power of the G-d of Israel? Did a Jewish people exist for 2,000 years without state, government, or army, wandering the earth interminably from land to land, suffering pogroms and Holocaust and surviving powerful empires that disappeared into history, just by coincidence? Did a Jewish people return to its land from the far
corners of the earth to set up its own sovereign state – exactly as promised in the Bible – through mere natural means? What other nation ever did such a thing? Where are the Philistines of Goliath today?
Where is imperial Rome with its Latin and its gods? Who defeats armies in six days, and on the seventh they rest?

Who if not an Israel because there is a G-d in it! The Land of Israel is His divine land, the State of Israel is His divine hand. History is not a series of random events, disjointed and coincidental. There is a Creator, a Guide, a Hand that plans and directs. There is a scenario to history. The Jew has come home for the third and last time. “But the third shall be left therein” (Zechariah 13:8). “The first redemption was that from Egypt; the second, the redemption of Ezra. The third will never end” (Tanhuma, Shoftim 9).

We live in the era of the footsteps of the Messiah, the beginning of the final redemption. The rise of the State of Israel from the ashes of Auschwitz marks the end of the black night of humiliation and agony, of
Hillul Hashem, and the beginning of the dawn of the final, total redemption, of Kiddush Hashem, sanctification of G-d’s name.

The State of Israel is not just one more Asian nation. It is G-d’s hand, raised high — at last!– to put an end to the humiliation of His name. “Therefore say unto the House of Israel … I do this, not for your sake, O House of Israel, but rather for My holy name which you desecrated through the nations whither you came. And I will sanctify My great name that was desecrated amongst the nations … and the nations shall know that I am the L-rd when I shall be sanctified through you before their eyes. And I shall take you from among the nations and gather you out from all the countries and I will bring you into your own land.” (Ezekiel 36:22-24).

The State of Israel is not a “political” creation. It is a religious one. No power could have prevented its birth and none can destroy it. It is the beginning of G-d’s wrath, vengeance against the nations who ignored, disdained, and humiliated Him, who found Him irrelevant, who “knew Him not.” But it is only the beginning. How the final redemption will come, and when, depends on the Jew.

“The exiles shall be ingathered only through faith” (Mechilta, Exodus). Faith! If we have it, if we truly believe in the existence of the Creator and Guider of history, the G-d of Israel, we can bring the final redemption today. “When will the Messiah come? Today, as it is said: ‘Today, if you will hearken unto my voice'” (Psalms 95:7, Sanhedrin 98a).

But that faith is not a cheap thing, not mere words and lip service. It must be proved, tested in the fiery furnace of willingness to sacrifice. The readiness of the Jew to sacrifice and endanger himself in order to erase the worst of all sins – the desecration of G-d’s name – is the true test.

The Arabs of Israel represent Hillul Hashem in its starkest form. Their rejection of Jewish sovereignty over the Land of Israel despite the covenant between the L-rd of Israel and the Jews constitutes a rejection of the sovereignty and kingship of the L-rd G-d of Israel. Their transfer from the Land of Israel thus becomes more than a political issue. It is a religious issue, a religious obligation, a commandment to erase Hi Hashem. Far from fearing what the Gentile will do if we do such a thing, let the Jew tremble as he considers the anger of the Alm-ghty if we do not.

Tragedy will be ours if we do not move the Arabs out. The great redemption can come immediately and magnificently if we do that which G-d demands. One of the great yardsticks of rea/ Jewish faith in this time of momentous decision is our willingness to reject fear of man in favor of awe of G-d and remove the Arabs from Israel.

The world? The nations – united or otherwise? What do they matter before the omnipotence of the Alm-ghty!

“Why do the nations rage … the kings of the earth set themselves and the rulers take counsel together, against the L-rd and against His annointed. … He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh, the L-rd shall mock them …” (Psalms 2:1-4). The Jewish people and state cannot be destroyed. Their weapon is their G-d. That is reality.

David understood “realism” and “practicality” and “rationality.” His last words before killing Goliath were: “And all this assembly shall know that not with the sword and spear does the L-rd save. For the battle is the L-rd’s and He will give you into our hands.”

And then David removed Goliath’s head from his shoulders and removed humiliation from Israel.

Let us remove the Arabs from Israel and bring the redemption.

THEY MUST GO.

Posted in Arabs, Israel, R. Meir Kahane | Comments Off on They Must Go

Rabbi Meir Kahane & The Nazi Question

R. Meir Kahane can’t get through an interview without being asked if his program does not resemble that of Nazi Germany. He answers that anyone can convert to Judaism while the Jews of Germany could never be accepted as legitimate Aryan Germans by the Nazis.

On Aug. 27, 1985, Dennis Prager debated Rabbi Meir Kahane on the Ray Briem show. “It was one of the ugliest debates of my life,” says Dennis in a 2004 lecture on Deuteronomy 15. “He was insulting the whole night.”

Here are some highlights of the debate as transcribed by Dennis Prager and published in his Fall 1985 edition of Ultimate Issues:

Briem: “Why in Israel, that always has had such compassion for people, invited the Arabs to come and stay in Israel when it was formed…would you want to kick them?”

Kahane: “Because the people of Israel and especially the Sephardic Jews of Israel, the Jews who came from Arab countries, didn’t learn about Arabs in seminars on the West Coast. They lived with Arabs, they know what it means to have lived under Arabs, and they’d never again want to.

“The problem is that the Arabs who live inside Israel hate Israel. And they understand that the Arabs, if they could, would do the Jews what they do to themselves every day in Beirut. They don’t want that to happen. They’re not troubled by the niceties of Western democracy.”

“I don’t hate Arabs. I love Jews. And I intend to save the Jewish people, both from Arabs and from themselves.”

Briem: “Where does your policy differ — other than doing away with them in a concerted campaign — from what Hitler did to the Jews?”

Kahane: “If you really mean that question, I’m astounded. The Jews of Germany never ever said, ‘This country is really ours, the Germans stole it from us, and when we become the majority, we’ll take it back and call it Israel.’ The German Jews wanted nothing more than to be the best Germans that ever lived. And the Arabs don’t want to be Jews or Israelis.”
“The Arabs say, ‘The Jews stole this country from us, we were the majority once, we want this country back, when we have it back it will be Palestine.’ And if there is anyone…who thinks that there is one Arab in Israel who would rather live in a country which is defined legally as the Jewish state, he has greater contempt for the Arabs than I thought that even liberals could have.”

“There is a basic contradiction between Zionism and Western democracy. A Jewish state at the very minimum means a state with a majority of Jews, because only in that way can Jews solve their own destiny, be masters of their own fate. Western democracy postulates the basic axiom that it doesn’t matter who’s the majority. It doesn’t matter if you’re Jewish or non-Jewish, whoever’s the majority is it. Therefore there is a basic contradiction, since most western Jews are basically schizophrenic, with one foot inside Judaism and the other half inside western culture, and they would like to believe that Judaism is Thomas Jefferson. It isn’t.”

Prager: “I’d like to defend Judaism from the smear campaign that Meir Kahane has directed against it.”

“[Kahane] is [antisemitism’s] tragic echo, produced to a large extent by the Holocaust and by the Arab desire to destroy Israel. He is a classic product of Jews being hated for all these centuries, and he has incorporated a mirror image of the non-Jew in his psyche. He hates non-Jews as he feels non-Jews hate him. His answer to Arafat is to be the Jewish Arafat.”

“Ray, you asked him, and he dismissed it as a lunacy, what really differentiates Meir Kahane’s attitude to Arabs from Hitler’s to German Jews. He didn’t answer you, because the difference is minimal.”

“This is a Jewish fascist. It is a tragedy that he cites that he is rooted in Judaism when there isn’t anything normative in Judaism — Orthodox, Conservative or Reform — that supports him.”

“One could cry over the fact that there is some popularity to someone who has such views when the Torah instructs the Jew to love the stranger because the Jews themselves were strangers in Egypt and know how it feels to be one.”

Kahane: “The Torah and the Talmud say any appointment of authority in Israel shall only be Jewish. That’s not democracy. Maimonides states clearly that no non-Jew shall ever be appointed over a Jew, even as a clerk concerning the water carriers.”

“Judaism states clearly that the Jews, when they create a Jewish state, will not grant citizenship to a non-Jew.”

Brien: “Dennis, Rabbi Meir Kahane has said here recently that the rationale for wanting to push all of the 730,000 Arabs out of Israel and the occupied territories, is that they hate Israel and Israelies. They think it is still Palestine and they resent it, they can never coexist because of that, and because of their birthrate one of these days they are going to become a majority.”

Prager; “It is the lie upon which Rabbi Kahane predicates his case, and it should be exposed as such. Let me cite just a handful of statistics. The Arab population of Israel was 11.1% in 1960. As of the last census last year it is 17%. In 1965, the average Israeli Arab had 8.4 children. In 1981 it went down to 5. The jews are at 2.7 and rising. They [the rates] are in fact going to meet as industrialization continues, Arabs leave their farms and so on. Basically, the rabbi bases his ideas on waht I have to call a lie, that Israel will cease to be a Jewish state given simple demographics.”

“Rabbi Kahane is by and large considered in the Jewish world an immoral aberration.”

Kahane: “Assuming the Arabs would become a majority, what would Dennis Prager say?”

Prager: “In theory, the Jewish state has a right to remain a Jewish state. Just as during WWII, England suspended certain democratic processes.”

Caller1: “Mr. Prager, do you believe that the Arabs, if they have a chance to destroy Israel, will do that?’

Prager: “Most Arabs would.”

Caller1: “Then from that standpoint alone you must admit that Mr. Kahane has a reason for doing that [throwing Arabs out] because the Arabs will unite and destroy Israel the first chance they get.”

Prager: “Yes, but one of the reasons that it is important to have a Jewish state is in order to preserve Judaism. But if Israel becomes like its Arab neighbors in moral outlook, then the only difference between a Kahaneized Israel and an Arafatized Jordan is the language they speak. So Israel’s reason for being, if it becomes a state as morally low as many of its neighbors, [is undermined]. Israel can continue to be a light unto the nations, as a democratic state in the midst of tyranny, and need not be compromised just because of its enemies.”

Kahane: “If all the Arabs tomorrow become saints, and I was now living in a state with 730,000 Arab saints who in 20 years will be two and a half or three million Arab saints, and in 30 years will be the majority of the country but saintly, I don’t want to live as a minority under any saints.”

Caller4: “I would rather see a strong Israel that everybody hates, rather than an Auschwitz that everyone loves.”

Prager: “I agree with you… Part of the giveaway on Rabbi Kahane’s moral understanding is as he said, ‘even if all the Arabs were saints.’ In other words, the issue is not morality, it is race. It is Arab blood that is detested, not Arab morality. In other words, no matter how decent they might be, he wants to kick them out. Morality is foreign to his understanding. it is a blood-based understanding.”

Kahane: “You know very well taht if any Arab came to me and said, I would like to become Jewish, and he converted according to the proper standards, of course, just as any other non-Jew, that he would be welcome, blood and all… My problem with the Arabs has nothing to do with their blood. It’s that they want Jewish blood.”

Prager: “You respect [Arabs] so much that you want to chase them out.”

Kahane: “Exactly.”

Dennis concluded in his journal: “Neither rationally nor morally can Kahane be distinguished from other religious extremists, including antisemites. He is a Jewish version of the Ayatollah Khomeini and the medieval Christian crusader.”

Dennis published a page showing parallels between Kahane’s legislation and the Nazis laws against Jews.

Dec. 13, 2001, Prager said that almost all of Kahane’s proposed laws for Israel (making it a crime for a Jew to sleep with a non-Jew, to swim in the ocean with a non-Jew, etc) came from Torah Law.

Wikipedia said: “Kahane’s legislative proposals focused on transferring the Arab population out from the Land of Israel, revoking Israeli citizenship from non-Jews, and banning Jewish-Gentile marriages and sexual relations, based on the Code of Jewish Law compiled by Maimonides in the Mishneh Torah.”

Rabbi Kahane realized that what Jared Taylor wrote about the white conquest of
America would largely hold for the Jews in Israel (as well as for the Australians in Australia, the New Zealanders in New Zealand, etc):

The intentions of whites—sometimes good, often
bad—really did not matter. The fundamental fact is that one people had the land, and another, more advanced and powerful people wanted the land. The result was dispossession, and even now, despite a great deal of intermixing, Indians are a distinct people with a distinct identity that shows how difficult assimilation is across racial lines, even after 400 years. Race relations mean conflict.

From Ultimate Issues: Kahane’s Laws Against Non-Jews and the Nazis’ Laws Against Jews

Yair Kotler, one of Israel’s leading journalists, an editor of Haaretz and senior writer for Maariv, compiled a list of laws against non-Jews that Meir Kahane proposes that the Israeli parliament pass and has juxtaposed them with nearly identical Nazi laws against Jews. The list appears in Mr. Kotler’s book Heil Kahane (Modan Publishing House, Israel, 1985) and is translated from the Hebrew.

Kahane Legislation

Status of Non-Jews
a. Non-Jews have no national rights and may not take part in the political process of the State of Israel. They are forbidden to be appointed to any position of authority and prohibited from voting in elections to the Knesset or any other governmental or public body.
b. They have special obligations of taxes and servitude. If they do not agree to servitude and taxes, they will be forcefully expelled [from the country].

Residential Restrictions
A non-Jew may not reside within Jerusalem’s borders.

Prohibition of Intermarriage
Jewish men and women who are citizens and residents of the State are forbidden to marry non-Jews, both in Israel and abroad… Such intermarriages will not be recognized at all as marriages.

Relations Outside of Marriage
a. It is forbidden for Jewish men and women who are citizens of the state to engage in either partial or full sexual relations of any type with non-Jews, and this includes relations outside of marriage. Anyone who violates this section shall be imprisoned for two years.
b. A non-Jew who has sexual relations with a Jewish prostitute or with a Jewish male shall be imprisoned for fifty years.

Separation of Students
All educational institutions in the State of Israel will be separate for Jews and for non-Jews.

Prevention of Contact Between Youths
Camps and community centers and all [other] mixed institutions shall be prohibited. All programs of Jewish and Arab students visiting with one another in villages shall be prohibited. Trips and visits abroad, in which Jewish students visit in non-Jewish homes, as well as similar visits by non-Jews in Israel, shall be prohibited.

Separation of Beaches
Separate beaches of equal quality for Jews and non-Jews shall be set up. A member of one nation who is found at the beach set up for the other nation shall be imprisoned for a half year.

Nazi Legislation

Status of Jews
Jews may not be citizens of the Reich. They have no right to a political vote, nor may they serve in a public position.

Residential Restrictions
Apartments in Berlin and Munich that have been rented to Jews may not be re-rented to any Jew, his wife, or to a Jewish concern without special permision. (February 8, 1939)

Prohibition of Intermarriage
Marriages between Jews and citizens of the state who are of German blood are forbidden. Such marriages that have been contracted against this law are invalid even if done so abroad. (September 15, 1935)

Relations Outside of Marriage Between Jews and Citizens of the Reich

a. Relations outside of marriage between Jews and citizens of the state who have German or related blood are forbidden.

Separation of Students

There is now a prohibition on Jewish students studying in German schools. They may study only in Jewish schools.

Prevention of Contact Between Youths

a. It is forbidden to include non-Aryan students in visits to youth hostels.
b. It is not tolerable that Jewish students participate in school events in which they may come into physical contact with German students.

Separation of Swimming Pools and Places of Recreation

a. Jews may not enter public swimming places.
b. At recreation and medical places, Jews and non-Jews are to be separated.

Posted in Dennis Prager, Israel, Nazi, R. Meir Kahane | Comments Off on Rabbi Meir Kahane & The Nazi Question