The Liberal Jewish Crack-Up

Steve Sailer writes: …the big trend of 2015, following the anti-Semitic massacres by Muslims in Europe, is that the group that dominates the contemporary mindset, ethnocentric liberal Jews, are starting to feel the pressure on the obvious logical contradictions between their sensible is-it-good-for-the-Jews ethnocentrism and their public avowals of diversity uber alles.

…everybody knows that, even without Iovine, Jewish music executives played an outsized role in the gangsta rap that persuaded so many impressionable young black idiots to become crack dealers…

Jewish comedians have been joking about their people’s mania for expensive German cars at least since the 1970s when, in my recollection, the Mercedes-Benz 450 SL convertible was the pre-eminent car in Beverly Hills. But how Jewish is Trevor Noah? Is he ethnically privileged enough to joke about Jews and German cars or not?

…Why comparing Jewish women’s apparent respect for their virtue to the world’s greatest soccer player’s respect for competition rather than for fakery is supposed to be anti-Semitic is unexplained. But that’s not the point, the point is that you aren’t supposed to joke about Jews if you aren’t officially Jewish.

…In America, the 97% of the population who aren’t either Jews or anti-Semites are pretty much intellectually disarmed by crimestop. It’s fascinating to try to list members of the 97% who kept their wits when it comes to thinking about Jewish influence in America. Off the top of my head, I can think of the obvious examples of Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Richard Nixon who together in 1969 conjured up neoconservatism by deliberately exploiting the Jewish ethnocentrism revivified by the 1967 Six-Day-War to get more Jewish intellectuals to support America in the Cold War. But in the last 45 years, I can only come up with a handful of names of gentiles who haven’t been intimidated: John Updike (for his good-natured series about the Jewish novelist Bech), and …

COMMENTS:

* It’s not that the typical white gentile American is intimidated into going along with Jews, it’s that he is eagerly, willingly, zealoulsy pro-Jewish in a way which he would never feel comfortable being pro-his-own-group. A lot of these people are more fanatically pro-Jewish than is the typical American Jew! It’s a strange psychological trait and one which has never received the exploration it deserves.

In spite of what some commenters on this blog seem to believe, this sort of thinking is not limited to “evangelical Christians”.

* A real stinging and relevant Jewish joke today wouldn’t be about Jews pinching pennies but about Jews throwing massive amounts of money to buy up politicians and other people in positions of influence. Even this Trevor Noah controversy is all about how Jews should throw their money around. Is it a lucrative deal to offer millions to this comedian who goes by South African cultural rules and isn’t properly sensitive about ‘American’ rules that have been rejiggered by Jews.

Indeed, Sheldon Adelson and Haim Saban would be far less dangerous if they pinched pennies than if they threw hundreds of millions at politicians who grovel at their feet.

Jordan Belfort and Benrie Madoff were NOT penny-pinching Jews but Jews who threw their money around, and they turned out to be far more dangerous than penny pinching Jewish pawnbrokers of old.

* Trevor’s mild jokes about Jews get noticed but his stridently anti-white views sserve to burnish his resumé.

MORE COMMENTS:

* Dear god where do all these smug, opinionated Jewish broads come from and who keeps paying them to write the shit they write?

* Noah should reference Alyssa’s post on his first episode, and say that, in response, he made sure at least 50% of his writers were Jewish, in order to do his part to combat Jewish underrepresentation in comedy writing.

* Every article on this is saying the same thing. If you wanna be in showbiz ya better repent! These writers are so damn obvious. It’s unbelievable that people can’t see how these writers all seem to work in concert with each other. It’s like how the one of the articles from the earlier post made it seem like random curious people just happened to look into this, only to be shocked at what they found. As if there were a groundswell of concerned citizens, rather than organized activists who base their life on vetting celebrities and other noteworthy people to make sure their views and interests are aligned with their own.

* Interesting comparing the professional headshot of Rosenberg at WaPo to the image grab from BloggingHeads or whatever that is. What a difference professional makeup, lighting, and camera work makes. Computer cameras aren’t too flattering for most people.

* Between Rosenberg and Claire Cain Miller, it’s almost as if there’s a contest about who can more flamboyantly eschew logic. Rosenberg’s argument — that hiring ethnic minorities is a way for a comedy show to avoid offending people — refutes itself. Comedy Central just did that with Trevor Noah and look what happened.

* Fat, Jewish chicks are not funny.

What is funny is that fat, Jewish chicks think they are sexy.

* Background: Billy Gordon is an aboriginal who was recently elected into the state parliament of Queensland. His history of domestic violence is beginning to surface, and some people are calling for him to resign because of this. But others are saying that this is just another witch hunt of an aboriginal man, blah blah. It’s interesting because domestic violence against women is presently the national talking point. Most people associate “wife beaters” with “Bogans” , but the reality is that aboriginal women experience the highest rate of domestic violence, perpetrated by…aboriginal men.

* I bet this mulatto mischling is pretty stunned he’s being called an anti-semite for these totally non-offensive jokes, when Jon Stewart played with Jewish stereotypes quite a bit on his show.

Seems like as the number of mischlings increases, the full-Jews feel the need to crack down on them, so gentiles don’t get the idea that Jews are fair game for comedy.

The worst case scenario would be someone like Dieudonné M’bala M’bala becoming popular with non-white Americans.

* The larger question is how come so many foreigners are getting top slots on our TV chat shows? ANSWER: Its an end run around hiring white American guys who are all racist patriarchal oppressors. Instead you hire a white Brit for your Late Show. Or this Noah because you figure he can get away with more un-PC humor due to his foreign black status. Plus Africans immigrating to America is in these days. Our awful president is an African immigrant. Almost.

There is a very busy and hip buffet near me and every single black guy working there is from Africa. And they have quite a few. American blacks need not apply. The crowd they attract is multi-racial, white, Hispanic etc 30 year olds and some with children. The foods are clean, grilled, non-greasy plus a sushi selection. Happening food for the young and diverse. Yep, I like their food and go there.

* Just like Dieudonne, Noah will learn the hard way that he is ranked lower in the victimhood rankings than jews.

Regarding Sailer not having heard of Noah, he is a coloured from South Africa, but unlike the traditional coloureds his mother was black and father white, the normal coloureds have been mixing only with themselves for a long time. He is also not very PC and sees everyone as fair game in his comedy, in South Africa jews and whites are seen as more similar by the non whites, than jews and whites are seen in America. Also in South Africa blacks are at the number one rank of the victimhood pantheon, not the jews.

He notices things, but he clearly is not aware that America very tightly controls what you can notice and say, so like I said at the start, he is going to learn the hard way how society in America works…

* This reminds me of what happened to Razib & the NY Times.

So the takeaway is not to selected talented unknown people of colour because of controversial statements in the past.

The safer choice is to pick someone whose parents were adroit enough to enrol them in diversity classes in private school. So essentially the Establishment gets to perpetuate itself while maintaining the aura of diversity.

* I too feel that Jews are terribly under-represented in the media and unable to defend themselves.

* I hope the old media and academia put wet blankets like Alyssa Rosenberg in every job they can. I hope they drown in this stuff for at least another decade. The rest of us will get on with our lives beyond their mundane little cultural swamp.

Just thinking about them gives me that heavy, frustrated and entangled feeling of trying to get through a swamp. Social justice warriors are the Swamp People and that’s what they should be called. Actually, the terms “Social Justice Warrior People” and “SWPLs” can be mated and turned into “swampies” with a little imagination.

Alyssa Rosenberg is a swampy. Just occupying the same mental space as her immediately gives a person that feeling of being entangled in a swamp. Laughter and joy die in a swamp and in the presence of people like Alyssa Rosenberg.

MORE COMMENTS:

* Although I love the irony of Comedy Central replacing the Jewish host of the Daily Show with an anti-Semitic one, otherwise it seems like the most bizarre choice ever. If they wanted to go the affirmative action route and hire a Person of Color, why not get an American comedian who might actually have some basis to understand the American political scene that you’re expected to talk about 5 nights a week?

* Mr Foxman of course says,

“And we hope that he and Comedy Central will make a conscious effort to ensure that ‘The Daily Show’ remains funny and irreverent without trafficking in bigoted jokes at the expense of Jews, other minorities and women.”

So we can assume that he thinks trafficking in bigoted jokes at the expense of white gentile men is just fine. Of course he does.

* PC totalitarianism is a privilege that only rich Westerners can afford to indulge in. Poor countries like South Africa don’t have that luxury.

I recall a couple of years ago an Afrikaner man who worked as an air traffic controller at Johannesburg International was caught on the loudspeaker calling an African worker a “Kaffir”. Not only did he not lose his job but the black workers at the airport didn’t even pretend that they cared.

* If you believe culture determines everything, and ‘culture’ is malleable, the only way to see the change you wish for is to control it completely. The slightest deviation can derail [another annoying buzz word] attempts at such change. And the only way you can convince people to adhere to such rigidity is to believe yourself that allowing said deviations will, if you really think about it, lead inexorably to female manumission. If a joke (an accurate one at that) about large women is let slide, the next thing you know women everywhere will be losing the right to vote and own property. This is crazy, but within their intellectual framework, it’s logical.

* You can detect the nervousness of the Atlantic staffers. They recognize that the Daily Show is not just a comedy show but is a tool for indoctrinating young viewers (as noted by Jamie Weinstein) and they do not want to lose control of that. They are worried that this unknown South African dude might not be on their team. Hence they urge him and the Daily Show to “try harder” and “be better in the future”; i.e., get with the program, African guy.

* There’s a hilarious anecdote about Redd Foxx and S and S. At one point he started getting racially conscious and told the producers to fire all the joke writers and hire only blacks. After a few weeks of declining ratings, he told his producers: Get rid of these motherfuckers and get me some jews!

* The Atlantic article’s insistence that these jokes aren’t funny reveals how threatened they are by humor.

The coalition of the fringes is more vulnerable to mockery than the core, and if they lose the reins of mainstream comedy, they’re toast.

Hence, they have to whip the troops into shape with a constant drumbeat of “not funny! Not funny! Thou shalt not laugh!”

Because you know, if people are allowed to just laugh at what they find funny, who knows what disaster may befall us.

* US is a liberal democracy by law, but Jews have gained such total domination in government finance, entertainment, and media that they impose and run the Narrative like communist governments used to do. Everyone in the US knows he or she is finished if he or she displeases Jews. The ONLY thing Rick Sanchez said is Jews made it in the US, they are rich, and very prominent in the media. That was enough for him to be blacklisted worse than the Hollywood Ten (who were Stalinists and real scumbags).

Because everyone fears Jews, no one says anything that might be construed as insulting to Jews. Only Jews can say some funny or biting stuff about Jews, but Jews take pride in this as example of their own self-criticism and ability to laugh at themselves. But it is monopolized ONLY by Jews. It’s like a dictator of a nation making a joke about himself to show that he’s an fun easy-going guy but then forbids ANYONE ELSE to do likewise. So, even his self-mockery is a form of narcissism. “I’m not only so very great but sort of humble and don’t take myself too seriously.” It’s like Mao who forced all Chinese to worship him as a god but then told Edgar Snow with false modesty that he’s irritated by all the cult of personality and only wishes to be remembered as a teacher, ‘a school teacher’ at that.

* Perhaps we should stop pussyfooting around the truth. Jews are starting to read the handwriting on the wall. Jews should be hyper sensitive about negative speech towards them, because their tribal Zionism and oligarch bankers are doing America and the West a great disservice.

They are repeating the same pattern of activity that got them in trouble in Germany in the last century and the many centuries before that. They tribally conspire to take over their host culture, hurting that culture. Clearly they have accomplish that in America – clearly we are currently beginning to live that hurt – and sadly for all, it is just starting.

* It always astounds me that Jews never seem to make the connection between their behaviour (such as that you refer to) and an eventual explosion of goyim resentment, which is always portrayed as resulting from mindless bigotry.

You’d image that absorbing this vital lesson would represent a major step forward for their ethnic evolutionary strategy. As well as a God-send for the rest of us!

* This Twitter hysterical lynch mob attack phenomena is a female thing . Back in 1991 when I left the best job I ever had (99%) men and went into a “profession” that was 99% female , it took me about 3 months to figure out how they work . They stick together no matter what . I learned very quickly that any time the swarm noticed any hint of a hive member in distress they would turn and attack the source (me) as one , reflexively , like a group of white blood cells clumping around a foreign invader . For them there is no right or wrong in any conflict there is only the instinctive group solidarity and instinctive drive to kill .
Eventually as a matter of survival I adapted and even thrived , got laid and made some friends but with a few exceptions developed a deep and lasting contempt for women as a group .

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on The Liberal Jewish Crack-Up

America Should Copy Israel’s Immigration Policies

Chaim Amalek writes: “Nebech! What are all the liberal Hollywood Jews going to say or do about this? What will the ADL say or do? What will the SPLC say or do? I wish the media would not cover this story, as nothing good can come of it.”

Forward: Israel will begin deporting African migrants to third countries without their consent.
The migrants, from Eritrea and Sudan, will be sent to a southern Israeli prison if they refuse, Haaretz reported, citing the Interior Ministry. Israel’s attorney general, Yehuda Weinstein, approved the process, under which the migrants will be given 30 days notice before being told to which third country they will be traveling. No timetable was given for the deportations.
Some 42,000 Eritrean and Sudanese citizens are living in Israel, with 2,000 in the Holot detention facility, where residents are required to check in twice a day. Many have made their home in south Tel Aviv.
Israel has granted official refugee status to just four of more than 5,500 official asylum seekers.
Approximately 1,500 African migrants have been sent to Uganda and Rwanda over the past year in voluntary departures. The Israeli government provided them with airplane tickets and grants.
Israel as a signatory to international refugee conventions may not deport asylum seekers to their countries of origin if their lives would be in danger. If the asylum seeker is sent to a third country, Israel must secure an agreement that they will be treated fairly and have basic rights.
Many of the migrants who voluntarily left for Rwanda and Uganda, having no basic rights, left their third countries and again became refugees, Haaretz reported.

Posted in Immigration, Israel | Comments Off on America Should Copy Israel’s Immigration Policies

Mass immigration causes overpopulation

Link: R.I.P. California (1850-2016): What We’ll Lose And Learn From The World’s First Major Water Collapse

Chaim Amalek: “I would rather go thirsty than go without diversity, and so too would all sensible people.”

“Just as man made industry by relying on interchangeable parts, so too did Hashem made the yellow race with interchangeable goyim: some Korean, some Chinesers, some Japankas. But for Torah Yidden, all equally useful.”

“Ditto. The Spanish. Each race was made for a purpose. One to haul out our trash, another to stock our stores with food, another to watch the kids when a bais yakov girl is not available, and so on. Mexican, Guatemalen, whatever. Each has his place in America, each is useful to us, and each was put here by Hashem for a reason. Like birds and trees.”

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on Mass immigration causes overpopulation

Robert Stark interviews Luke Ford about the Germanwings Pilot, Despair & Eroticized Rage

Topics include:

Luke’s new Torah Talk show which relates the Torah’s text to modern day issues of Race, Nationalism, and Jewish Gentile relations

Luke’s New Co-Host who is a beautiful young blonde Jewish girl who shares Luke’s passion for the Torah and dissident politics

1

2

3

The Torah Coral

Jews For Consistency

Narcissist and God: Love-Hate Relationship

What’s The Difference Between A Blogger And A Suicide Bomber?

Was Andreas Lubitz A Beta Male Suicide Bomber?

What is the SCALE problem?

Andreas Lubitz: The Intersection of Mental Illness And Social Atomization

How Nihilist and Sociopaths often have accurate observations on human nature that those with a moral code often look over

Gendered Racial Exclusion by White Internet Daters

The theme of degradation in Pornography

Posted in Nationalism | Comments Off on Robert Stark interviews Luke Ford about the Germanwings Pilot, Despair & Eroticized Rage

Dennis Prager’s Pro-Israel Bias

Jack* emails: Dear Luke,

I read the Dennis Prager posts you put up. It is important to realize that what underlies all of these posts is Dennis Prager’s strong bias in favor of Israel. He thinks he is being objective, but everything is filtered through a Likudnik lens. Only a truly ignorant person would equate Iran to Nazi Germany or call it the most dangerous country in the world. Iran deals with North Korea because everyone else placed on arms embargo on it. North Korea was the only country willing to sell it missiles and missile technology. Prager ignores Iran’s demographics, something that David Goldman (who writes as Spengler and has about ten times Prager’s IQ and analytic ability) understands. (Incidentally, I am not a fan of Spengler, but he isn’t as dogmatic as Prager)

While I am not fond of Obama, I do think that on foreign policy, he is so much better than either McCain or Romney would have been. I don’t think Obama should have intervened in Libya. I think he should have pulled troops out of Afghanistan a long time ago, and I don’t think he should have let Victoria Nuland depose the Ukrainian president and usher in this confrontation with Putin. But if either McCain or Romney had been elected we would be in half a dozen more conflicts around the world. Prager sees things in Manichean terms: The US (in particular George W. Bush and the Neo-Cons) and Israelis (especially Likud) are good. Everyone else is evil. Countries including the U.S. and Israel have interests. Other nations have conflicting interests. That doesn’t make them evil. But if you call something evil long enough you lose sight of their fundamental humanity and can justify destroying them.

I know you are studying Torah. There is an important lesson in Genesis when Abraham goes to retrieve Lot from Sodom. God tells Abraham he will destroy the city and Abraham argues with him bargaining with God not to destroy the city if there are ten just men in the city. This is believe it or not one of the most important passages anyplace in the Pentateuch, the Holy Scriptures, the New Testament, the Talmud. Why? Because it tells us that it is unjust to destroy the innocent, the righteous, along with the sinners. We have to make a distinction. This is the underpinning of all of Criminal law, whether as evolved in England or in other societies.

You have reached the rather easy conclusion that it is far easier to explain the world by looking at how the sexes and races actually react and behave rather than how we want them to react through some bizarre world social construct. Now take the next step when confronted by Prager who is glib and simplistic and thinks he is a lot smarter than he is.

You may fear Iran and you may fear any deal Iran may make with Iran, and those fears may be justified, but don’t buy into the hysteria about Iran.

Likewise his crap about the Palestinians. You heard how he not only dismissed but put down Kahane. Now he has come to the same conclusion but wants to blame it on the Palestinians. What type of construct does he see where the Palestinians can coexist with the Israelis without being willing to be subordinate to them? He has no problem talking about that under Arab rule, Jews were in a kind of dhimmitude, but fails to see that being a second class citizen in Israel, is analogous to a Palestinian.

Posted in Dennis Prager, Iran, Israel | Comments Off on Dennis Prager’s Pro-Israel Bias

Andreas Lubitz: A Mile High Intersection of Homosexuality And Schizophrenia?

Chateau Heartiste: “Lubitz was a closeted gay who was cuckolded by his girlfriend and was suffering from schizophrenia. The combination of these three — ah, insults — to his mental well-being pushed him over the edge.”

Bill: “Anomie. Expect more psychotic incidents as the West grows increasingly unmoored from any coherent social paradigm.”

Comment: “Some people can handle radical individualism and social atomization in a sea of increasing materialist diversity. But most people can’t. Unmoored is the right word to describe it all.”

Posted in Homosexuality | Comments Off on Andreas Lubitz: A Mile High Intersection of Homosexuality And Schizophrenia?

From The Coal Burning Front

Blog by a fat white woman:

I can’t go to Walmart without getting approached by at least 5 black men. I see some beautiful black women, Latina, Asian, banging bodies, cuter faces and they don’t get approached. But I get approached.

“Just because a white girl has a big ass doesn’t mean she wants to take car[e] of you or that she wants to sleep with you. There are a lot of white women that are allowing this. Stop doing that sh*t.

COMMENTS:

* Don’t hyenas usually go after the easy pickings in any herd?

* We shouldn’t laugh about blacks enabling bad white women’s qualities.

* How many of the white women are of obvious Italian ancestry? They seem to have a certain tendency to go for mystery meat.

* In more ghetto trashy stores you’ll notice ugly white girls with blacks. Same with fat uglier Mexican girls with blacks. Funny. But I’ll concede, in upper middle class areas, you’ll see 7-8s with blacks and Mexicans, but never 10s.

MORE COMMENTS:

* Given female propensity for adhering (at least on surface) to the dominant groupthink, and that musharking is being pushed as “good” by MSM and approved culture, the real percentage of white women salivating over muhdik is actually LOWER than the 8.4% in the sample.

* Walk down the street in Watts or Anacostia as a white guy with a black girl and see how far you get before the Brothers police your activity. It’s instinctive to want to protect one’s womenfolk from outside plunder.

* Likewise Asian men hate it.

I finally figured out why my Asian girlfriend couldn’t keep a job.

Every time I showed up where she worked she got fired.

* My own observations from da club scene indicate that there be quite a few white wimmins in the 5-8 range receptive of da black dong. Some were low value wimmins happy to have game spat at dem and some appeared decent who accepted spittle only from da homies who were booted ‘n suited, stylin’ n’ profilin’. Very rarely did I see anything over an 8 in the 20-25 range let alone a young, bonerfide dime accept game from the darker persuasion. Perhaps subconsciously they knew it would adversely affect the attention they could otherwise generate from higher value whitey’s?

* Perhaps, but the most likely scenario is America will look like Brazil which is problematic in itself but not the Black Orc Horde Apocalypse that should be feared.

It is telling that Whites in Latin America, especially Argentina(think Valeria Mazza), Chile(Pia Loyola Miller), Uruguay, and southern Brazil(Mostly Spanish/Italian/German/French/Portuguese stock for all those countries) segregate themselves from the more freaky race-mixing going on in Brazil between Orc-Blacks and the Native Indians. In places like Peru & Ecuador you have a clear segregation between the Euro ruling class, then the meztizo’s, and then pure blooded Indian natives near the bottom but still above Orc-Blacks. That dynamic usually plays out in a lot of Latin America countries, most notably when a sizable population of blacks are in that nation like Venezuela, the Dominican Republic, and Colombia. In those few places where there is a significant population of Asians like Brazil and Peru Asians either self segregate or mix with European ruling elite cf President Alberto Fujimori of Peru.

That’s why I think race mixing between American Whites and Latina’s(they’re mostly Euro-Meztizo mixed already) and Asians isn’t going to be hugely problematic(although Latino revanchism cf La Raza/MeCha/et al. could change that) for America while any mating with Orc-Blacks on any level is almost always problematic.

In a way I could see a dynamic similar to Latin America emerging in America where some Whites, Latino’s, and Asians inter-marry to create a relatively stable society between these groups over time while Orc Horde Blacks and their Half-Orc mulatto spawn remain at the bottom of the social hierarchy. A few mulatto’s might mix into the larger population(cf Afro-Cuban Rosario Dawson and Stacey Dash come to mind) through their own skill and luck and there might be some groups of upper class Blacks(lighter skinned as well) but by and large it will be the Whites/Latinos/Asians who run things in America’s future.

Also, the silver lining to Latina’s and Asians is that they are overwhelmingly not Muslim and largely Christian and Buddhist. Both groups to varying degrees have an ethos that allows for values like hard work, compassion, and mercy. That’s fairly manageable for Americans. The real danger is in Obama importing millions and millions of Muslims whose culture is at compete odds with the culture of Americans. Don’t believe me? Ask yourself where are the war brides from Iraq, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia where US soldiers have been stationed? Damn few, especially in comparison to previous wars and overseas bases which have seen Americans bring back the local girls in great numbers from Japan, England, Germany, Italy, France, Vietnam, and the Philippines. Hell, I think American and European soldiers have brought back more dogs from Afghanistan & Iraq than Muslim women.

That should tell you everything you need to know about the differences between American and Islamic cultures….

As for America, the problem has and always will be the Orc Horde Blacks. I’m more convinced than ever American Blacks will never be happy in America until Whites are either enslaved or ethnically cleansed from America a la Whites in Zimbabwe. The only place Blacks seem happy is Africa which is why they go to such lengths to recreate little Africa’s across America like Detroit, Compton, Oakland, Chicago, and Ferguson.

* Of course a small number of white women “willingly” date black men, but their “will” is wholly deformed.

No normal, healthy white women, from original mother and father, dates blacks.

It is an abnormal behavior that is the expression of her damaged past in the same way a stripper’s occupation is an expression of her’s.

The causes for the abnormal psychology are multivariate, but the two primary variables are the tripping of her attraction mechanisms via anti-nature TV programming and weak or non existing fathering.

* Whites are the most socially aware race. They value the opinions of those of their in-group or tribe more than any other race. So if a white girl dates a black guy at the dismay of her family and friends, she will be cut off from her family and ostracized from her friends, in theory of course. Everyone who knows her or knows of her will know of her terrible secret and the shame and ridicule of that secret would be too much to bear. It’s an adaptive evolutionary trait for survival amongst multiple groups (races). Only when different races are in the vicinity do white men vehemently defend white woman and will disown any white women who violates her race. For a white woman to leave the white man would be a stupid mistake, considering she would lose her social status, wealth, and most of all reputation which the woman would do anything to make her look like the pure, innocent, white angel ideal she was reared to live up to. Same with white men. What white guy wants to be known for sexing sheboons? The jokes would never cease, and the “eew” look from pretty doe eyed white girls is too high a price.

As a black man those numbers are humiliating but I have never had problems dating non-blacks. You get the bullsh*t lines, the shit test that could be motivated by ethnic prejudice or racial bias but handle them like any other sh*t test and she then realizes you have some intelligence and some balls, not just another D’Quattroprius asking Where da white wimmin at? The secret to white women or any woman considered elite is to be better than competition. Have more confidence than the men of their race, show that you are not afraid of the men of her race. if they are materialistic and money conscious make more money than the competition. Just try be better than the alphas of her race so the only doubt she has is your not of her race. Obviously I have been rejected from women of all races and some might have genuinely not been attracted to me or have a racial preference, I would never know and that is fine. All is fair, I’m no cry baby.

Me personally I will marry and pro create with a black woman, preferably with European admixture considering I am 77% SS African, 21% Germanic/teutonic, and 1.8% Amerindian. I will have bestial fun with all the other races.

* Black men don’t prefer sex with white women just as a revenge for slavery, although it is probably a minor sexual component for them. To be more raw and specific, black men prefer sex with white women as they perceive it as more sexually degrading for the white woman and that is a sexual turnon for black men. Actually, that is a turnon for most men if they would admit it. We are talking about sex here, not “making love”. It is also a turn on for white women for the same reason. Even though the white woman may be the most politically correct female on the planet, she can still “feel” sexually degraded by having sex with a black male. It doesn’t have to be rational to be a sexual turnon. What you believe in mentally and what you get off on sexually can be worlds apart. Why do you think so many male and female CEO’s of major companies are seriously sexually submissive while the lowly government clerk may be the Alpha man in some kinky B&D / S&M group? Seeker of Unpleasant Truths hit on it when he pointed out that a lot of white women wouldn’t consider marrying or maybe even dating a black male but enjoy sex with the almost exclusively. Black men can get off on the feeling of sexually degrading white women without actually having to admit that is what turns them on. Even more importantly, white women having sex with black men, can get off on the feeling of being sexually used and degraded without having to admit that being sexually used and degraded turns them on.

Posted in Blacks, Dating | Comments Off on From The Coal Burning Front

Gendered Racial Exclusion by White Internet Daters

From a 2008 Princeton paper, highlighted by Chateau Heartiste blog:

Among white women, one of the most striking findings is that white women who describe themselves as slim, slender, athletic, fit or average are nearly seven times as likely to exclude black men as dates as women who describe themselves as thick, voluptuous, a few extra pounds, or large. For white men, body type has no effect on their likelihood of excluding blacks or Asians. While political views also have no effect on racial exclusion by white men, white women who describe themselves as liberal or very liberal are less likely to exclude black men as dates than women who are not political, middle of the road, or conservative. Surprisingly, liberal white women appear more likely to exclude Asian men as dates, although this finding only borders on significance. Finally, religion affects black exclusion, and Asian exclusion among white women. Specifically, we see that whites who identified as Jewish were dropped from the analysis of black exclusion because it was a perfect predictor; that is, all white men and women who identified as Jewish excluded blacks as possible dates; all white women who identified as Jewish also excluded Asian men as possible dates. Further, white men who do not state a religion or who state their religion as “other” are far more inclusive of black women as dates than those who describe themselves as not religious. Likewise, white women of “other” religions are more likely to include Asian males as dates.

racisswhitewomen

torah

From the Chateau Heartiste blog:

Now the only question remaining is whether fat white chicks settle for black men because those are the only men who’ll have them, or that black men try but fail to get sexy white chicks and decide to shoot for the easy prey because even a fat white girl is more feminine than the typical black girl? Same difference, I suppose. My limited knowledge of the mating rituals of matricentric cultures is that it’s a bit of both; fat chicks are stuck choosing between a steel-reinforced dildo and a black man, and black men hone in on fat white chicks because they love can tolerate grotesque booties and they learned from experience that sexy white chicks want nothing to do with them.

These findings are perfectly in line with the CH observation — heck it’s in line with just about everyone’s observations except that no one wants to bring it up at the company picnic — that the white women who date black men are often fat, gross, and classless.

Probably unsurprising to most, the kind of white women willing to dance by the dusky coonlight? Fat liberal white women with sanctimony issues.

I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say that fat liberal white women are just about the most unappealing dating prospects for any white man with options and a working set of nads. So… good riddance…

Racism is natural, evolved, and a part of what makes us human. Racism expands the diversity in the world by creating and sustaining group aesthetics that would otherwise get swamped into oblivion by a one-world fuckfest.

Posted in Blacks, Dating, Race, Whites | Comments Off on Gendered Racial Exclusion by White Internet Daters

It’s Important To Invest In The Coming Latino Majority

The Los Angeles Daily News reports Mar. 31, 2015:

While their growth has slowed in recent decades, Latinos will likely be the majority in Los Angeles County by 2020, experts say.

And since 2001, more than 60 percent of babies born in L.A. County have been Latino compared with more than 50 percent in the state. This generation is the future of California and thus it’s important to invest in it, said David Hayes-Bautista, professor of medicine and director of the Center for the Study of Latino Health and Culture at UCLA’s School of Medicine.

“Their educational levels and their employment opportunities set the economic tone for this region,” Hayes-Bautista said. “If they do well, we all do well. If they do poorly, we all do poorly.”

And the disparities are clear. Nearly 11 percent of Latino adults in California ages 25 or older have earned at least a bachelor’s degree compared with 30 percent of all Californians, 39 percent of whites, 23 percent of African-Americans and about 48 percent of Asian-Americans and Pacific Islanders, according to 2011 U.S. Census Bureau data.

The Latino post-millennial demographic, which will soon be of voting age, has also been offended by anti-Latino and anti-immigrant sentiments espoused by some political groups and would likely express their opinions at the ballot box, Hayes-Bautista said.

Steve Sailer writes in 2005:

Everyone across the political spectrum admits that the white-black test score gap is a major social problem, but nobody is thinking about the white-Hispanic test score gap, even though we have much more influence through immigration policy over whether Hispanics will be a large or huge proportion of the American population in the future. Fortunately, the facts are available, but they take a lot of digging to uncover.

Here’s the best estimate I’ve yet seen: A 2001 meta-analysis of 39 studies covering a total 5,696,519 individuals in America (aged 14 and above) came up with an overall difference of 0.72 standard deviations in g (the “general factor” in cognitive ability) between “Anglo” whites and Hispanics. The 95% confidence range of the studies ran from .60 to .88 standard deviations, so there’s not a huge amount of disagreement among the studies.

One standard deviation equals 15 IQ points, so that’s a gap of 10.8 IQ points, or an IQ of 89 on the Lynn-Vanhanen scale where white Americans equal 100. That would imply the average Hispanic would fall at the 24th percentile of the white IQ distribution. This inequality gets worse at higher IQs Assuming a normal distribution, 4.8% of whites would fall above 125 IQ versus only 0.9% of Hispanics, which explains why Hispanics are given ethnic preferences in prestige college admissions.

In contrast, 105 studies of 6,246,729 individuals found an overall white-black gap of 1.10 standard deviations, or 16.5 points. (I typically round this down to 1.0 standard deviation and 15 points). So, the white-Hispanic gap appears to be about 65% as large as the notoriously depressing white-black gap. (Warning: this 65% number does not come from a perfect apples to apples comparison because more studies are used in calculating the white-black difference than the white-Hispanic difference.)

Source: Roth, P. L., Bevier, C. A., Bobko, P., Switzer III, F. S. & Tyler, P. (2001) “ Ethnic group differences in cognitive ability in employment and educational settings: a meta-analysis.” Personnel Psychology 54, 297–330.

This fits well with lots of other data. For example, Hispanics generally do almost as badly on the National Assessment of Educational Progress school achievement tests as blacks, but that average is dragged down by immigrant kids who have problems adjusting to English. The last time the NAEP asked about where the child was born was 1992, and Dr. Stefan Thernstrom of Harvard kindly provided me with the data from that examination. For foreign-born Hispanics, the typical gap versus non-Hispanic whites was 1.14 times as large as the black-white gap. But for American-born Hispanics, the gap between non-Hispanic whites and American-born Hispanics was 0.67 times as large as the gap between non-Hispanic whites and blacks, very similar to the 0.65 difference seen in the meta-analysis of IQs.

Steve Sailer writes in 2013: From the New York Times:

Paper on Immigrant I.Q. Dogs Critic of Overhaul

Brendan Hoffman for The New York Times

WASHINGTON — The revelation that a co-author of a Heritage Foundation study critical of the Senate’s bipartisan immigration proposal had recently argued that Hispanic immigrants are less intelligent than white Americans touched off a furor on Wednesday, undercutting the conservative foundation’s attempt to become a major force in the immigration debate.

In a 2009 dissertation for a public-policy doctorate at Harvard University, Jason Richwine, the co-author, wrote that Hispanic immigrants generally had an I.Q. that was “substantially lower than that of the white native population” — and that the lower intelligence of immigrants should be considered when drafting immigration policy. 

“Immigrants living in the U.S. today do not have the same level of cognitive ability as natives,” wrote Dr. Richwine, who is a senior policy analyst at Heritage. “No one knows whether Hispanics will ever reach I.Q. parity with whites, but the prediction that new Hispanic immigrants will have low-I.Q. children and grandchildren is difficult to argue against.” …

In response, the New York Times counter-argued: “… [cough] … [cricket chirp].” Oh, well, I guess it is difficult to argue against. But it’s easy to point-and-sputter:

“Whether you agree or disagree with the Heritage study, what their co-author believes is downright insulting and shameful,” said Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, a group that has mobilized support for the bill. “Heritage has really become an outlier. The rest of the country is having a 21st-century conversation about immigration reform, and Heritage is caught in 1800. I really think their entire credibility is in question.”

The disclosure of the dissertation written by Dr. Richwine, who could not be reached for comment, threatened to undermine Heritage’s push for influence even as the foundation distanced itself from Dr. Richwine’s outside writing.

You can read Dr. Richwine’s Harvard Ph.D. dissertation, IQ and Immigration Policy, for yourself.
The three Harvard scholars who signed off on it are:

– George Borjas is the leading immigration economist. His Harvard Kennedy school bio reads:

George J. Borjas is the Robert W. Scrivner Professor of Economics and Social Policy. He received his PhD in economics from Columbia. His teaching and research interests focus on the impact of government regulations on labor markets, with an emphasis on the economic impact of immigration. He is the author of Wage Policy in the Federal Bureaucracy; Friends or Strangers: The Impact of Immigrants on the U.S. Economy; Heaven’s Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy; and the textbook Labor Economics. He also edited Immigration and the Work Force; Issues in the Economics of Immigration; and Poverty, International Migration and Asylum. 

– Richard J. Zeckhauser, whose Kennedy School of Government bio reads:

Richard Zeckhauser is the Frank P. Ramsey Professor of Political Economy. Much of his conceptual research examines possibilities for democratic, decentralized allocation procedures. … He has been elected as a fellow of the Econometric Society and the American Academy of Sciences and as a member of the Institute of Medicine (National Academy of Sciences). … He serves as a Trustee for The Commonwealth School and as a member of NBER, the Russell Sage Roundtable in Behavioral Economics, the Academic Advisory Committee, American Enterprise Institute, and the OECD High Level Advisory Board on Large-Scale Catastrophes. …  He holds a BA (summa cum laude) and a PhD in economics from Harvard University.

Christopher Jencks, who has been perhaps the leading left-of-center social scientist of his era. My first published work was a letter-to-the-editor that appeared in National Review over 40 years ago making a joke about Jencks’ meta-analysis of the Coleman Report, his 1972 book Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. Jencks characterized himself in that books as a “socialist.” Jencks has contributed two dozen pieces to the New York Review of Books since 1964. Jencks’ book The Black-White Test Score Gap was the most scholarly left-of-center response to The Bell Curve.

In other words, these three guys are social science heavyweights. Jencks, for example, knows vastly more about IQ than everybody screaming at Richwine put together.

This is an example of how the Gang of Eight’s amnesty bill is a trap for all but the most politically correct, for anybody with a sense of realism. When Dave Leonhardt of the New York Times, who is really a pretty good guy (he publicized the Hoxby-Avery study, for example), writes about “Hispanics, the New Italians,” he’s probably not being intentionally disingenuous, he’s just being East Coast ignorant. From his bio:

Mr. Leonhardt studied applied mathematics at Yale.  He is a third-generation native of New York.

What does a third-generation native of New York who studied applied math at Yale know from Mexican-Americans? Nothing.

On the other hand, if you are from L.A., like me, it’s hard not to notice that there is, on average, an IQ gap and that it doesn’t go away, and that has all sorts of implications for education, real estate, immigration, mortgages, and so forth and so on.

One of the goals the Democrats have in inviting in more illegal immigrants by amnestying the ones already here is to rub the noses of more white people in the facts of diversity, so that they have to choose between being Evil or being Complicit.

And nobody hates us Evil folks like the Complicit.

For data from Generations of Exclusion on Hispanic educational attainment through five generations of assimilation within families, click here.

For data from Roth et al on test score gaps between whites and Hispanics, click here.

Posted in IQ, Latino, Los Angeles, Mexicans | Comments Off on It’s Important To Invest In The Coming Latino Majority

Caring About White People Is Apparently A Bad Thing

Mike Fleming writes for Deadline.com: “Deadline ran an article last week that generated controversy and hurt feelings. An unfortunate headline–Pilots 2015: The Year of Ethnic Castings – About Time or Too Much of Good Thing?—created a context from which no article could recover. My co-editor-in-chief Nellie Andreeva’s goal was to convey that there was such an uptick of TV pilot casting of people of color that it pinched white actors who’ve historically gotten most of the jobs, and to question if this could last if it was being treated as a fad. All this was undermined by that headline (which we changed after the fact) and a repetition of the word “ethnic” that came off cold and insensitive.”

Posted in Whites | Comments Off on Caring About White People Is Apparently A Bad Thing