These Stars Will Totally Do Your Bar Mitzvah

Link: In April 2015, the “Starships” rapper set the bar for bar mitzvahs sky high, when she performed at 13-year-old Matt Murstein’s coming of age party at The Pierre Hotel in Manhattan’s Upper East Side. [Nikki] Minaj performed a private set of seven songs, snapped pictures with the teens on Matt’s step and repeat, and even doled out a little life advice to the crowd. Matt’s dad, Andrew Murstein, is the founder and president of Medallion Financial Corp.

Nicki Minaj bar mitzvah instas

* In 2008, Snoop Dogg told Esquire magazine, “I performed at a bar mitzvah. And I’m telling you, man, these little [expletive], they were singing my [expletive], they was cussin’, they were singing the dirty version. I’m talking about 12- and 13-year-old little white kids singin’ this real gangsta [expletive]. Man. I was shocked. I just gave them the mic and let them [expletive] go.”

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on These Stars Will Totally Do Your Bar Mitzvah

ADL Condemns Ann Coulter

Why would anybody think Jews control the media?

From the Washington Times: Ann Coulter is being vilified on social media after she accused GOP presidential candidates of pandering to “f–ing Jews” during Thursday night’s CNN debate.

“Cruz, Huckabee Rubio all mentioned ISRAEL in their response to: ‘What will AMERICA look like after you are president,’” the annoyed pundit tweeted to her 664,000 followers. “How many f–ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?”

“Maybe it’s to suck up to the Evangelicals,” she posited.

“All GOPs = prolife, pro-Reagan, pro-Israel. Pandering on all 3 tonight was EPIC,” Ms. Coultersaid.

Ms. Coulter defended her profane tweet, adding, “I like the Jews, I like fetuses, I like Reagan. Didn’t need to hear applause lines about them all night.”

The comments didn’t go over well on social media. Conservative radio host Mark Levin called her a “jackass.” New York Post columnist John Podhoretz told her directly, “Shame on you.” New York Times bestselling author Joel C. Rosenberg called her comments “ugly” and “reprehensible.”

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) also released a statement condemning Ms. Coulter. The group’s national director, Jonathan A. Greenblatt, issued the following statement Thursday morning:

“While most of America has rightly tuned out Ann Coulter’s hyperbolic and hateful rhetoric, her irresponsible tweets during the Republican presidential candidate’s debate are truly a new low and must be called out. Ms. Coulter is pandering to the basest of her base. Her messages challenging the candidates’ support for Israel were offensive, ugly, spiteful and borderline anti-Semitic. Her tweets give fodder to those who buy into the anti-Semitic notions that Jews ‘control’ the U.S. government, wield disproportionate power in politics, and are more loyal to Israel than to their own country. All decent Americans should reject Ms. Coulter’s rhetoric as simply beyond the pale.”

Posted in Ann Coulter, Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on ADL Condemns Ann Coulter

Simon Wiesenthal Center Denounces Ann Coulter’s Anti-Semitic Presidential Debate Tweet

From Wiesenthal.com:

“Ann Coulter asks, ‘How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?’ and then blithely dodges Fox News’ direct challenge of her gratuitous anti-Semitic slur.”

“Disgusting,” charged Rabbi Abraham Cooper, Associate Dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a leading Jewish Human Rights NGO, reacting to Coulter’s Tweet during last night’s Republican debate.

“And if a simple, “I am sorry” is beyond the reach of the vocabulary of this noted wordsmith, then perhaps she has unearned her spot among top tier political pundits,” Cooper concluded.

The holy rabbi does not lower himself to explain what was disgusting about her tweet.

Posted in Ann Coulter | Comments Off on Simon Wiesenthal Center Denounces Ann Coulter’s Anti-Semitic Presidential Debate Tweet

Is Ann Coulter Anti-Semitic?

John Derbyshire writes: A side story from Wednesday night’s GOP candidates’ debate—covered more thoroughly in the full Radio Derb posted today—was the fuss about Ann Coulter getting exasperated with all the candidates’ asseverations of solidarity with Israel and tweeting, “How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?”

The beep that Radio Derb listeners will hear, by the way, is Ann’s, not mine. Her actual tweet said “f-hyphen-hyphen-hyphen-i-n-g.”

This caused a lot of shrieking and swooning, especially of course from ethnocentric Jews. Actor Seth Rogen told Ann that, quote, “You are a horrible f—ing idiot.” John Podhoretz harrumphed back on Twitter.

Novelist and former British Member of Parliament Louise Mensch, who is Jewish by marriage, predicted that the offending tweet would end Ann’s career.

I seriously doubt that. Those of us who love Ann—and to judge by her book sales, our numbers are legion—love her for the same reason people love Donald Trump: she breaks the mold of conventional political rhetoric.

Trump does the same. The more he does it, and the more the Establishment pundits say “That’ll finish him for sure!” the higher his poll numbers go. I predict the same for Ann’s book sales.

And the mold of conventional political rhetoric has needed breaking. For more than a generation now—for thirty or forty years—politicians have observed the PC proprieties, walking on eggshells around anything that might give offense to anyone, pandering to favored groups and influential donors. The result has been that important issues don’t get discussed in the political arena—immigration policy being the outstanding example.

From the point of view of those of us who are fed up with that style of political diction —half mealy-mouthed schoolmarm prissiness, half unctuous fawning—Ann’s Wednesday tweet was a scream of protest against the latter: against unctuous fawning on what GOP candidates seem to think is a key voting segment.

Why do they think that? Estimates of the proportion of self-identifying Jews in the U.S.A. range from two to four percent, depending on whom you ask; and not all of them are fans of Israel. Why so many shout-outs from GOP candidates to such a tiny demographic? That’s a politer form of Ann’s question.

What’s the answer to Ann’s question? The answer is of course that Ashkenazi Jews punch way above their demographic weight in media and intellectual circles, and in big-money political donations, because their high average intelligence brings them success in the relevant fields.

That’s a fact of life in the U.S.A. I don’t myself think it’s a particularly deplorable one. Whether it is or not, it surely doesn’t justify the shameless and blatant pandering that Ann was targeting.

That pandering just fortifies the impression that our candidates, when they speak, are speaking to wealthy donors and influential commentators, not to us dull-witted, no-account proles: precisely the impression that is driving Donald Trump’s success.

Ann’s tweet was of course well-received by anti-Semites, opening her up to charges of guilt by association. Is she herself an anti-Semite?

adiosamericaA good place to go seeking an answer to that question would be Ann’s recent book, ¡Adios, America!

The book has 12 index references to Israel. Some are duplicates, references to the same passage under different headings. Here is a very brief summary of the eight referenced passages.

  1. The U.S.A. should be just as wary of changing our nation’s ethnic structure as Israelis are of changing Israel’s.
  2. Israel is among the nations with the lowest rate of sex trafficking.
  3. Israel has a robust policy against illegal immigration. Quote: “I admire Israel’s policy and wish we could adopt it,” end quote.
  4. Israel’s border fence works really well. U.S. politicians who scoff at the efficacy of border fences should direct their remarks to Israel.
  5. More praise for Israel’s firm policy against illegal immigrants.
  6. Quote: “Jews forthrightly ask: Is it good for the Jews? Why can’t Americans ask: Is it good for Americans?” End quote. There follows a comparison of our troubles with Mexico versus Israel’s with Palestine. This section ends with, quote: “Could we move Israel to our southern border? They know how to defend a country.”
  7. She pooh-poohs the lie that diversity is a strength, and raises counterexamples all over the world, including, “Israel with its Jewish and Palestinian populations.”
  8. The anomaly of the New York Times giving over an editorial to boosting money transfers from the U.S.A. to Mexico when there was plenty of more important stuff going on in the world. There follows a paragraph listing that stuff, amongst it “Israeli airstrikes on Palestinians.”

That’s all Ann has to say about Israel in her book—not exactly a catalog of frothing Jew-hatred. The main impression you get about Ann’s attitude to Israel is that she admires their politicians for doing what ours will not do: defending their national sovereignty and keeping their ethnic balance intact. See Ann Coulter Calls Fury Over Jewish-Debate Tweet “Fake Outrage”: “I’m Pro-Israel”, by Paul Bond, Hollywood Reporter, September 17, 2015.

And as Ann has been pointing out in response to the fuss over her tweet, mass Hispanic immigration, which GOP candidates like Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio have also been pandering to, is simply terrible for the Jews. [Ann Coulter Defends ‘F–king Jews’ Rant, By Jay Michaelson, Daily Beast, September 18, 2015 ] Hispanics have high levels of anti-Semitism. Where do you think all the old Nazis retired to? [In Argentine Haven for Fugitive Nazis, April Means Chocolate Eggs and Hitler Parties, By Meredith Hoffman, Tablet, April 29, 2014]

That’s not even to mention the mass immigration of Muslims into the U.S.A., which is giving anti-Semitism the kind of boost that mass immigration of rabbits would give to sales of lettuce.

Ann lays into that in her book very vigorously, under headings like Muslim Rape Culture and Muslim Terrorist Farmworkers.

If Ann’s down on the Jews, why isn’t she welcoming all these Jew-haters we’re bringing in?

Posted in Ann Coulter | Comments Off on Is Ann Coulter Anti-Semitic?

SOUTH PARK JUST DECLARED OPEN SEASON ON SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS

Breitbart: South Park, the grand old man of politically incorrect comedy, has finally taken on the social justice warriors.

In the season premiere, released yesterday, a new character was introduced: “PC Principal.” Describing himself as someone who is “sick and tired of how minority groups are marginalised in today’s society,” the episode revolves around PC Principal’s sometimes violent quest to rid the school of problematic language. Like Dolores Umbridge with more testosterone, PC Principal spends his debut terrorising anyone who he suspects of misgendering trans people or disrespecting women and minorities — occasionally beating up students in the process.

The show takes aim at the most absurdly PC story of recent months — the lionizing of Caitlyn (formerly Bruce) Jenner. The plot revolves around Kyle’s refusal to agree that Jenner is a hero. “I thought we were all on board that Caitlyn Jenner is an amazing beautiful woman who had the exquisite bravery of a butterfly flying against the wind,” screams PC Principal, “and then this sh*t comes out of peoples’ mouths!”

Amusingly, PC Principal and his gang of accomplices are portrayed as a hybrid of social justice warrior and college frat jock. At one point, the parents of South Park’s kids go to a college bar where they are accosted by “PC bros” who threaten to “throw down” at the slightest suggestion that Jenner isn’t a “stunning beautiful woman.”

Soon, the PC bros start talking amongst themselves (“Sweet, you’re PC bro?” “Yeah, Arizonia State.” Sweet bro, I’m PC U. Mass.” “Sweet dude.” “Sweet.”) and agree to set up a PC frat house under the leadership of PC Principal. (“No problematic language here bro!”) As a final test, pledges are told to “go outside and check someone’s privilege.”

Given that frat boys are the natural enemies of the social justice left on campus, it’s a creative bit of left-field humour. South Park cleverly questions whether the antics of the frat pack (at one point, the PC bros draw penises on Kyle’s face while he’s asleep) would be deemed acceptable if they were done in the name of progressive values.

Like some of the social justice warriors we’ve covered in the past, the PC bros take a hostile, even violently belligerent attitude to anyone who offends them. At one point, PC Principal beats Eric Cartman to within an inch of his life for using the word “spokesman” instead of “spokesperson.”

In fairness, even Shanley hasn’t gone that far. Yet.

South Park is fictional, but its satire is always grounded in current events. The treatment of Omar Mahmood, terrorised by PC students at the University of Michigan, is a reminder that the “PC bros” aren’t that far off from reality. Representing social justice warriors as frat boys actually comes across as quite accurate. In many ways, they are the new jocks, terrorising anyone who thinks or acts differently. In many ways, they’re just the stupid, meatheaded bullies of the past — they just wear dyed hair, thick-rimmed glasses, and plaid shirts these days.

Of course, there’s a limit to how far the show reflects reality. We’ve yet to see anything like the climax of the episode, where Cartman & co disrupt the PC frat house by luring a mob of pregnant Mexican women inside with tacos, and then setting loose a truck full of Syrian refugee children to be chased around the house by Jared Fogle.

As you might expect, the episode led to considerable hand-wringing from politically correct commentators. “It is a big deal when someone says ‘he’ instead of ‘she’ when talking about [Caitlyn] Jenner,” whined a writer at Bustle. The A.V club grumbled that South Park had been needling political correctness “for years” and that this episode was nothing new. More saltiness could be found on Twitter.

That said, no one watching this episode with an objective mind can doubt that this is one of Trey Parker and Matt Stone’s finest creations. Now in its 19th season, South Park retains its ability to be shocking, funny, and above all relevant. From the 9/11 truther movement to the language stormtroopers of trans acceptance, the show is relentless in its mockery of our collective manias.

Posted in PC | Comments Off on SOUTH PARK JUST DECLARED OPEN SEASON ON SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS

Australia’s New Prime Minister Strongly Supports Hate Speech Laws

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* [Malcolm] Turnbull is vehemently opposed to any watering down of the Racial Discrimination Act, which is something very close to the hearts of his electorate. I’d say Sailer is on the right track.

Turnbull:

Mr Turnbull disputed the argument that there should be no limitations on free speech, saying history had proven that “hate speech” was dangerous.

“I am very, very strongly of the view that hate, you know — people who peddle racial hatred — seriously undermine the stability and the harmony of our country,” the minister said.

“You don’t have to look very far, whether around the world today or in history, to see where hate speech can get you,” he said.

When asked about Attorney-General George Brandis’s comments that everyone had a right to be a bigot, Mr Turnbull said that there should be no tolerance for people who were racist.

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ):

“As soon as the Opposition as it then was, announced that it proposed to repeal Section 18C, the ECAJ consulted extensively and made known very publicly over many months that it would oppose any repeal of Section 18C.”

“That legislation has served the Jewish community very well over 20 years and should continue to do so. And the legislation should remain intact.

Posted in Australia | Comments Off on Australia’s New Prime Minister Strongly Supports Hate Speech Laws

Donald Trump’s Beautiful Wife Is From Slovenia

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Slovenia is about the perfect country. They have never started any wars, never had a major war fought within their borders. Never had sectarian or civil strife. Never been ruled by despots (Tito’s rule was quite mild). Never been a source of malcontents or revolutionaries. I heard that the landscape is absolutely beautiful: forests, mountains, farms and delightful small cities and towns. And it appears that they produce strikingly beautiful women. And there are only about 2 million Slovenes. But why should they have nice things? If they could force the matter, the SJWs would compel Slovenia to take a couple of hundred thousand of these invaders and destroy Slovenia forever, just because.

* It looks like Europe is screwing Serbia again. In 1999, NATO took the muslims’ side in Kosovo and helped rip away that province. Now the Europeans have encouraged muslims to immigrate en masse into Europe, and Serbia will have to take a big bite out of this sh*t sandwich.

Dumping muslims into Serbia, after the Serbs watched what demographic change brought to Kosovo, is akin to rubbing salt in an open wound. I really feel for the Serbs and am embarrassed that my tax money went to support that 1999 bombing campaign.

* If my memory serves me right, it wasn’t that long ago Serbia was noted for not being too kind to the Muslims settled on its territory.

* All that angst, all that blood letting, violence, suffering and hatred emanating from Serbia just 20 years ago, and the pages and pages and pages of anguished editorial written over it, were, in the great scheme of things, just a pure exercise in futility.

* The open borders left keeps “reminding” Europe that to reject these refugees would be to violate international law on asylum.

Merkel unilaterally and illegally, without consulting the Bundestag (sfaik), declared that Germany would accept basically as many refugees as wanted to come.

Merkel unilaterally and illegally declared, in violation of international law, that these refugees did not have to claim asylum in the first safe country they arrived in.

Merkel unilaterally and illegally sent Germany’s neighbors into chaos as refugees overran them on their way to Germany.

Merkel unilaterally demanded that her fellow EU countries accept some of the refugees she herself illegally invited, after it became clear that too many would come.

But the open borders left keep obsessing about an asylum treaty that has no real legal power to bind a sovereign nation, while ignoring Merkel’s own flagrant violations of the law, just as they ignore or play down Barack Obama’s insistence on ignoring American immigration law.

* One of Angela Merkel’s vibrantly DIEverse Muslim angels stabbed a German female police officer in Berlin.

Why aren’t the Feminazis using this as an example of the war on women? The Muslim man probably stabbed her because he believes women are too inferior to be anything other than baby making machines and housewives.

In his Islamic culture women are only good for sexy time (in Borat accent) and for pumping out little Muhammads out of their vaginas.

* All nonwhite countries violate the international law of asylum. How many Syrian refugees has Mexico taken in? Jorge Ramos should publicly shame his home country of Mexico for not opening their doors to millions of immigrants who do not share the same Catholic religion as the Mexican people.

Mexico needs more Mosques and less Catholic churches.

* On the ground here in Croatia (but far away from the Serbian border).

No one except for a tiny minority of foreign-backed NGO shitheads is welcoming these refugees as the mainstream liberal politicos have done a 180 in 24 hours. The Interior Minister, Ranko Ostojic, has openly told the refugees himself in plain English that there is no room for them in Croatia, that Croatia is not a transit country to Germany, and that if they wish to save their lives they should return to Serbia, Macedonia or Greece.

24 hours ago the PM and the Mayor of the capital were telling the world that they would let the migrants pass through.

…except that Slovenia said it wouldn’t allow migrants to pass through.

Not one of these migrants is willing to register him/herself in Croatia as per EU/UN procedure for fear that it would stop them from getting to Germany, and ALL of them want to get to Germany.

Croatia has now closed its border with Serbia except for one tightly controlled crossing. The migrants now have the option of trying to swim across the various rivers or make their way through minefield-infested cornfields, which three weeks ago saw a de-miner lose his life.

Serbia is fuming that Croatia has sealed its border and is now threatening to ‘sue’ Croatia.

Hungary is extending its border fence for 41km to cover its border with Croatia that isn’t part of the Drava River.

Serbia is now becoming the chokepoint with Croatia sealed and the Serbs are now going to have to figure out what to do. Will they send the migrants through Romania so that they can try to pass through Hungary that way? Will they try to send them across Bosnia?

This is entirely Merkel’s fuck up beyond the guilt of France and the UK for removing Gaddafi. The EU is going to have to start actively patrolling the Greco-Turkish sea border one way or another.

* Hispanic immigrants to the US do come out as more desirable than the Mohammedan hordes currently besieging Christendom. Hispanics tend to be culturally much closer to Americans, being Christian and speaking an Indo-European language. Assimilation is beginning to occur. Also the majority of them do honestly want to work and build an honest life. Just this past week, two of the Hispanics I worked with had such poor English that they could not understand simple questions that I put to them. They worked hard though. That cannot be denied.

Finally, Mexicans and Hondurans are not machine gunning American cartoonists or bombing our commuter rail systems. Nor will they.

* Islam seems to make people more intense, Catholicism less intense.

Posted in Europe, Germany, Serbia | Comments Off on Donald Trump’s Beautiful Wife Is From Slovenia

It’s hard dealing with Ahmeds and other grifters

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Cultures with a long view never stop probing.

* I think there’s three things that explain why Obama and the left have jumped all over this incident: 1) disdain for white Texans who “cling to their guns and their religion” 2.) a desire to have more “diversity” in the STEM fields 3.) a desire to import Syrian refugees—The message you’re supposed to get from this incident is quite clear: We need young Muslims like Ahmed to stay competitive in the STEM fields; thus Americans must become more accommodating and welcoming to Muslim immigrants (and all third world immigrants); anyone who’s skeptical of Muslim immigration (and all third world immigration) into the United States is just a dumb, uneducated Texan who is oppressing young Muslim geniuses like Ahmed.

* The effect of this incident is not that schools will have some common sense reevaluation of zero tolerance. Rather, the effect will be that school and law enforcement officials will be to greater or lesser degrees more reluctant to investigate suspicious activity from Muslims.

Why on earth has this microscopic story attracted the attention of the sitting presidents, his flailing anointed successor, desperate to distract from her arrogance and ineptitude, and a pro-amnesty techie plutocrat?

Don’t be naive.

* I wasn’t even fazed when the story of the poor widdle Muslim astronaut boy turned out to be, what is called in pro wrestling, “a work.” There’s a roaring demand out there for victimhood-heraldry and the supply will rise to meet the demand.

* Anyone with an understanding of electronics will immediately see this “homemade clock” is not the tinkering of a child or teen. It was never Ahmed’s idea to begin with. This isn’t some innocent science project. The picture of the clock exposes the lie. Ahmed did not lovingly patch together IC chips and resistors, as the media would like you to believe. What you see is the guts from a manufactured digital clock, right down to the 9 volt memory backup, and the prefab button board. Absolutely nothing was made. It’s the equivalent of taking the plastic surround off of your TV and claiming you “made” a TV.

Look at the case itself. CNN calls it a “pencil case.” Please. The whole package is vaguely sinister, and it’s intentional. … It’s almost as if someone designed this clock to look like a questionable object.

Again, from CNN: “”I built a clock to impress my teacher but when I showed it to her, she thought it was a threat to her,” Ahmed told reporters Wednesday.” It was really sad that she took the wrong impression of it.””

Ahmed, you didn’t build a clock. You’re a pawn to your Dad’s political and social agenda. This is all a creation of your father. I’m sure he involved you in the process, and made you feel as though you were truly making something, but you didn’t. It’s a clock without its case. Everything in the “pencil case” was made in a factory. See, a legitimate electronics project full of diodes and resistors looks innocent. It usually runs off of a battery, not an exposed AC to DC transformer… speaking of science projects, Ahmed, why again did you bring this to class? Was it part of an assignment? Oh, you just wanted to impress your teacher with a clock you rearranged inside a small briefcase? Hmm…

From dallasnews.com: ““He fixed my phone, my car, my computer,” Mohamed Elhassan Mohamed said. “He is a very smart, brilliant kid.”

If he were so smart, he’d know the difference between creating a circuit and stripping the guts from a manufactured clock. His dad helped him “make” this, and dad helped to make this “project” look as questionable as possible, within the realm of plausible deniability.

The dad is a politician. He made this happen. Whatever agenda he’s advancing, it just further demonizes western society, and reminds us all to be guilty for how racist we all are. Maybe that’s the agenda.

It’s propaganda.

* The “clock” was never considered a bomb. The police arrested Ahmed for bringing a “hoax bomb” to school, which is illegal in Texas.

And their side of the story makes a lot more sense now. Why did Ahmed bring to school a repackaged clock that appears to *intentionally* resemble someone’s idea of a suitcase bomb? It’s a legitimate question, because the clock was not an original electronics project of any interest from a hobbyist/engineering standpoint.

* He’s being portrayed as a misunderstood child genius. The president has invited not only him to the White House but also illegal aliens and sex weirdos as well as making calls to athletes who come out of the closet. The criteria for presidential attention is really something else. What kind of a country is this becoming anyway?

* Obama is just having fun with this, holding up a middle finger to the people in the world he most hates: white American Republicans. I cannot figure out how it will help the Democrats though, unless he thinks the Republican slate is such a shambles that Biden or Hilary is sure to win. Either way, he reveals himself to be a vicious, petty, hateful, mean-spirited prick for the umpteenth time.

* I worked for TSA for a short time. While a lot of it is security theater in the security industrial complex, there was one thing I saw that never became public. In my short time I saw a handful of incidents where Arab/Muslim/Middle Easterners would bring through very suspicious crap. It was often too stupidly conspicuous to think it was some terrorist probing. And in a few of the cases I witnessed it was American Arabs/Muslims. They would do stupid crap like put razor blades in the spine of a Koran or have electronic wire shoe laces. On a few of these incidents the FBI would show up to do some perfunctory BS checklist chat with them before letting them go. I guess it was all just Muslim defiance and civil disobedience or perhaps buying a ticket to the lawsuit lottery.

* Well, if this teacher has a nervous breakdown (after being accused of overreacting and xenophobia by the court of PC) and winds up hospitalized, or dead it’s a problem for the pundits who grabbed those pitch forks early before a proper police investigation was completed.

I guess I am more fired-up over this because I have personal connections with Newtown; my mother was a teacher; and, duh, teachers are being attacked/denigrated/blamed for “failing” to close the mythical achievement gap. There is a nationwide shortage of teachers, and who would want to teach anymore since they seem to be the most hated group of professionals in this country. Calling that teacher, those teachers/administrators in TX morons, will backfire, I think it already has since I saw no articles in our state newspaper today.

Like I said in my earlier post, teachers MUST be vigilant of alleged guns, bombs, knives, violent ideation of students (gleaned from what they write) not to mention: heroin, weed, booze, cutting and burning. Lanza was an extreme case – would that someone could have stopped his car, grabbed his bag, stopped him before he mowed down a lot of kids and teachers in 5 minutes. The public doesn’t know how much his “school shooting” changed everything even more than Columbine. I am just outraged that this boy (must have been coerced to do this by dad/mom,) with his “show and tell” project, (after science teacher said, “put it away”) punked a bunch of gullible pundits, even the President. Besides, in HS, “show and tell” is over if it is not tied to a specific class or science fair.

All I can think of is: AL showed the American public that teachers/students in a building are vulnerable…better to overreact than dead. Playing the race card, PC card (in this TX case) is completely irrelevant and abhorrent after Newtown tragedy. Those pundits should be ashamed of themselves. BTW, they still haven’t settled the 2 lawsuits of parents suing Newtown.

* He brought the case and timing of a bomb to school. He did not build a clock. Briefcase is shorthand for ‘hard sided case’ backpack is shorthand for ‘soft sided’ case.

He obviously did not hope to see Obama what he wanted was some airtime he could show back home so he could be a serious candidate. He pulled equally boneheaded stunts before.

He just got the jackpot this time. A kid brings the guts and case of a bomb without the explosives to school right after 9-11? Yeah and he was told not to show it around because it looked like a bomb. Now I’ve only seen a few bombs but it does look like one.

* In psych-ops you humiliate, confuse and demoralize the opposition. In this case, whites are once again paranoid, low-rent racists picking on poor innocent non-whites. You hammer this over and over as a kind of ambient, background music. Subliminal penetration.

* Ahmed’s clock may not be very advanced technologically–but it doesn’t look to me like a briefcase bomb (comparing the photos).

The real story here is that unlike, say, 7-year-old Josh Welch, the second-grader who got suspended in Maryland for nibbling a Pop-Tart into the shape of a gun, Ahmed has a Muslim name, so the liberals can scream “Islamophobia!” and his arrest/suspension took place in conservative Texas rather than liberal Maryland, so the liberals can scream “Texas wingnuts!”

This is a zero-tolerance story: Zero tolerance is great in liberal Maryland, not so great in conservative Texas. When little Josh was suspended, not a single liberal pointed to the silliness of it all. Not so with Ahmed, where the liberals can’t stop raising Cain.

* “Zero tolerance” isn’t even tangential to this–because the device is understandably suspicious. Zero tolerance is when a kid faces legal action for stealing a kiss or having a pen knife. It may be tangentially about extreme law enforcement methods–why was he in handcuffs? But that’s like saying Ferguson was about militarized police because the cops there had an armored personnel carrier. Horse shit.

It’s about the US being trolled. It’s about a president who, without so much as a nod to the difficult job law enforcement has, immediately seizing on the nth opportunity to promote the Narrative. It’s about one of the most powerful businessmen in the country, one of the most prestigious universities in the country, and every “respectable” news outlet using it to stick it to us again. “Doesn’t look like a bomb to me” is–I’m biting my tongue. I actually saw some asshole somewhere saying “where’s the detonator, huh?” “where’s the fuse?” Yes, we’re all experts. Notice how all the folk praising the “brilliance” of young Ahmed aren’t too interested in the device. You’d think someone would be showing us just how ingenious an invention it is, I mean, if he’s got a spot at MIT all but lined up. Jeez!

By mostly, the kid wasn’t accused of bringing a bomb to school but of trying to create a bomb scare–which is almost exactly what it appears he did. It’s just they had no idea the type and scale of panic he was angling for. I’m sure his old man is pleasantly surprised by just how far this has gotten. Look forward to hearing more from him.

Posted in Islam | Comments Off on It’s hard dealing with Ahmeds and other grifters

Carly’s Lost Child To Drugs

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* This gives me the opportunity to hate on Carly Fiorina, for her misleading comments about “losing a child” to drugs. Now all the idiots think she lost her daughter to drugs.

1. Lori Ann Fiorina is not her daughter, she is a stepdaughter. Fiorina did not raise her, adopt her and they had no legal parent-child relationship. Fiorina is obviously trying to finesse the fact that she is childless.
2. Lori Ann died of abusing legal drugs.
3. It was disgusting for Fiorina to mix up a political opinion on drug policy with an emotional appeal to “just say no” anti-drug sentiment – which has obviously not worked.

That is only one of the many reasons why Trump is popular. He is honest about tough subjects and doesn’t make slobbery emotional appeals. His older brother died of alcohol poisoning and you don’t see him saying alcohol should be prohibited.

Naturally, her nauseating appeal to emotion, based on a lie, was lauded by WP.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Carly’s Lost Child To Drugs

Who Will Resist The Islamic Invasion Of Europe?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* European vanity dictates that they can do no other than to invite/welcome/exalt the invading hoard into their countries.

But deep down, they hope that some disreputable agent–like the Serbs, who already have a tainted reputation (by Euro-lights)–will do the dirty work of repelling the invader, and thereby saving the dainty graces of life in Europe.

If and when the ugly deeds are done, the Serbs can expect to be denounced and humiliated by the European elites, so the latter can have their cake and eat it too: clean streets with a clean conscience.

What’s that pseudo-Orwell quote about some people being able to sleep safely in bed because others are willing to do the rough work elsewhere?

* Two alternative outcomes seem plausible:

1. Anti-immigration parties make big headway in the coming decade, and European elites lose some of their enthusiasm for electing a new people. A bunch of cities are henceforth permanently saddled with cruddy Muslim and African ghettoes, but outside of these lousy neighborhoods, European life goes back to normal.

2. European leaders keep their feet firmly glued to the accelerator as they drive toward the demographic cliff. Public anger grows, until groups like the English Defence League or Génération Identitaire start getting their hands on automatic rifles and Semtex (perhaps with the aid of military or police sympathizers). European life becomes very, very interesting for a while, while “refugees” conclude that Saxony is no longer a marked improvement on Syria.

Posted in Europe | Comments Off on Who Will Resist The Islamic Invasion Of Europe?