Mets Player Daniel Murphy Not Thrilled With The Gay Lifestyle

From NPR: For some of the faithful who proudly wear Mets orange and blue, however, cheering for Daniel Murphy right now is a bit more complicated.

Last spring, former major league player Billy Bean, who is gay, paid a visit to the Mets in his role as baseball’s “Inclusion Ambassador.” Murphy responded to a question about the visit, saying he “disagreed” with Bean’s gay “lifestyle.”

“Honestly, if was really hurtful,” says Jon Raj, 46, a lifelong Mets fan who’s a gay father of an 8-year-old boy. Raj — pronounced “Ray,” — wrote an open letter to Murphy in the Huffington Post. In the letter, Raj praised Murphy for being “a great baseball player and a role model for [Raj’s] son.” But Raj also called Murphy’s statement “offensive.”

Posted in Baseball, Homosexuality | Comments Off on Mets Player Daniel Murphy Not Thrilled With The Gay Lifestyle

Steve Sailer: Moneyball Making Baseball Managers Whiter

Steve Sailer writes: General managers have gotten smarter over the decades, in part due to the moneyball trend, so they hire smarter managers.

In general, baseball statistics have become a kind of Safe Space for White Guys.

It seems like more white talent is going into baseball in recent decades. Huge fast guys like Mike Trout and Bryce Harper would have been football linebackers a generation ago, but now they are tutored from childhood to be baseball stars. Or consider Giancarlo Stanton, an immense mixed race guy from the suburbs. I saw him play high school football at Notre Dame of Sherman Oaks, and I don’t doubt he’d be an NFL defensive end today if he’d stuck with football. But he has a $300 million contract to hit home runs. He gets seriously injured just about every year in MLB, so he’d probably be crippled for life already if he’d gone with football.

COMMENTS TO STEVE SAILER:

* The Texas Rangers overlooked Ron Washington’s cocaine use and it cost them 2 World Series titles. Certainly against the Cardinals when he left Nelson Cruz in on defense in the 9th and tried to let journeyman middle reliever Darren Oliver close out game 7.

He had to set black managers back 10 years.

* Does winning matter more in Baseball than in other sports? I would imagine that it does — the lucrative regional cable channel deals like the Dodgers are only sustainable IF the Dodgers get to the Series, and win a few, like the Yankees did in the 1990s and early 2000s. What are the Dodgers getting from Time-Warner? Something like 200 million every year for five years? Isn’t that roughly the SportsNet LA deal?

With revenue streams like that at stake, and its worth noting that Guggenheim Partners, not Jerry Jones, owns the Dodgers, no wonder few Black managers can be seen anymore. Its not like the NFL.

There, socialism among Oligarchs rules. The Bills, Tampa Bay, Miami, Kansas City, the RAIDERS, they haven’t been competitive for decades. But who cares? Each team by my understanding, gets a roughly equal share of the TV deals, and the League does not allow the sort of exclusive cable nets that Baseball allows. On the up side, the NFL *IS* America’s Game. Being on free, NATIONAL TV for decades has clearly grown the game’s audience in the US, with only ESPN (and that only recently) having nationally televised games on pay TV. Heck even CBS has Thursday Night Football now for half the season.

The NFL, being centrally run, can afford a Lovee Smith at Tampa Bay, or Jim Caldwell at Detroit. Who cares if they win? The owners get paid anyway. The same goes for Pittburgh’s Mike Tomlin. The Steelers don’t have an incentive to produce winners in a five year time-span the way the Dodgers do.

Can you imagine Time Warner re-upping the deal if the Dodgers don’t win a series soon? All that money to the corporate owners? Poof! Meanwhile the Rooney family will continue to rake in the dough even if Coach Tomlin again gets booted in the first round of the playoffs. He’s no Bill Belichick, that’s for sure.

I wonder if the Pac-12 deal and similar stuff in College Football will create a Whiteness space, if conferences NEED to produce winning teams, and coaching time is short, with limited resources you’re looking at more Chris Petersons or Kyle Wittinghams, not Lovee Smiths.

* Baseball attendance traditionally correlated with winning. Dodger Stadium, opened in 1962, has an annual capacity of 5.5 million tickets sold, which they never come close to selling out, which gives teams a lot of incentive to put a winner on the field. In recent decades franchises have building smaller capacity parks where they can charge more per seat and have more sellouts.

* No, it wasn’t James idea that managers were useless, it was Beans opinion, especially of his own manager.

And Casey Stengel was using sabermetrics before Bill James invented them. Stengel firsts: five man rotation, shun the sacrifice bunt, platoons.

The Braves badly wanted to make an executive out of Henry Aaron, but they finally discovered he was the dumbest man in baseball. The new GM’s are pretty obviously IQ 130 plus, and that likely means in practical terms that they need to deal with managers if 115 plus. That leaves out 86% of white men and 98% of black men.

* I remember Felipe Alou, long time hispanic manager saying a big problem was retired hispanics preferring to retire like kings back in the Caribbean rather than go in to coaching and management.

* Nobody in NYC gives a shizz about the “Murphy is a homophobe,” although the twittersphere tried to push this. His awesome performance has made him a hero. Even the coverage in the NY Times hasn’t mentioned this. NPR is, well, NPR.

The whole team is a case of Moneyball. They have only one AA, Curtis Granderson, in the starting lineup. He’s a nice, intelligent guy, excellent ballplayer, who I think is secretly happy he plays in an environment where the tone is set by middle-class white boys.

Posted in Baseball, Race | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Moneyball Making Baseball Managers Whiter

Teacher Assault

Comments:

* I know an ex-Philadelphia teacher who was nearly killed in a Philadelphia high school and was left with terrible PTSD. He apparently said something to a student that the student interpreted as “dissin’ him” and the next day the student brought his fren’ to school to take revenge. The fren’ knocked the teacher out cold and broke his jaw. The fren’ was arrested but let go on some technicality – it was clear that the justice system had no interest in locking him up. This probably demoralized him more than anything and he was left in fear that the fren’ would return someday and finish the job. Needless to say he no longer works in the school system.

There are about 700 or 800 assaults against teachers each year in Phila. Please beg your niece to quit – the job is not worth her life.

* The Anti-White gvt of SA force Afrikaner businesses to employ Blacks. Funny how they never want to get “representative” #s in:

1) Necklacing
2) Interracial rape
3) Interracial murder

* Ahh, whites. Like alcohol, the cause and the solution to all life’s problems.

* In the discussion of this minor event on the news, no one even suggests that perhaps the black girl bears some measure of responsibility for what happened in that classroom. Are blacks entitled to ignore authority whenever they please? How do liberals propose teachers manage their classrooms with miscreants like this girl given free rein to act out?

Popular newspaper columnist James Kilpatrick asked a question a half century ago that no one has the temerity to ask today: “The law-abiding majority of this country, imperfect as it is, ought to put a hard question to large elements of the Negro community: When in the name of God are you people going to shape up?”

Posted in Crime, Education | Comments Off on Teacher Assault

Millions Of Third Worlders Have Third World Diseases

BBC: Parts of London have higher rates of tuberculosis than Rwanda or Iraq, a report from the London Assembly says.
A third of London’s boroughs suffer from high rates of TB, with more than 40 incidents per 100,000 people.
Some wards in Brent, Ealing, Harrow, Hounslow and Newham have rates of more than 150 per 100,000.
The report said prisoners, homeless people, people with substance abuse issues, refugees and migrants were particularly at risk.
Although the BCG vaccination against TB is recommended for all newborn babies in London, eight of the 24 boroughs do not offer it.
The rate of infection among UK-born Londoners has risen, while among the non-UK-born it has fallen – and the report said it would be wrong to assume TB was a disease of migrants.

The borough with the highest rate per 100,000 people was Newham, with 107 cases. Figures for 2013 from the World Health Organisation showed in Rwanda the figure was 69, while in Iraq it was 45.
Algeria and Guatemala also had a lower incidence than the capital, the reports points out.
The average rate per 100,000 in the UK as a whole was 13.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on Millions Of Third Worlders Have Third World Diseases

WP: Terri Upshaw says she had to choose between family and love

Washington Post:

She talks about being raised in the upper-middle-class Buich family, who owned San Francisco’s famed Tadich Grill. She calls her upbringing strict, loving and marked by expressed disdain for people who weren’t white or Christian. A fellow might be “a great guy” if he came into the restaurant, but you knew never to bring one home, she says. “I didn’t understand it, but I didn’t question it,” Upshaw says. “I lived in a house where you didn’t question.”

As a young woman working as a hotel catering manager, she met an older football player. An African American. They hit it off and became friends. Then more. He retired, accepted a job in Washington and asked her to move with him. They’d dated for eight months without her family knowing, and she had to make a decision.

“I was scared,” Upshaw recalls on a recent afternoon near her home in Northern Virginia. She says she broke the news to her brother and sister first. “They said, ‘I can’t believe you’re doing this.’ They said our parents would be livid, upset, disappointed, embarrassed, ashamed.”

Word got back to her father. She remembers how much she sobbed in that final family meeting with her parents and siblings. She was 23 and pleading for love — both theirs and her own. She thinks her mother and siblings were crying, but it has been so long. Only the final message was clear.

When she told her father that she had decided to follow the black man she loved to Washington, she says, “he told me that’s it — you’re out of the family. Change your last name, and don’t ever call us again.”

It was 1983. They married in 1986.

The black man was the legendary Gene Upshaw, whose 15-year career as a guard for the Oakland Raiders landed him in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. During 25 years in his equally famous second act as the controversial head of the National Football League Players’ Association, he helped usher in free agency, which led to an explosion in player salaries. Upshaw died in 2008, days after he was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. The union headquarters in Northwest Washington is named Upshaw Place in his honor.

Terri Upshaw says she has not heard from her family in decades, true to their final message. While visiting San Francisco a few years ago, she saw a news report that Tadich Grill would open a D.C. location, and last month it did, to great fanfare. Guests included prominent members of Congress and a Supreme Court justice.

A friend says:

The Tadich Grill may be the oldest restaurant in California. It specializes in fresh fish and seafood dishes cooked in traditional fashion. Its menu appears to be printed daily. The Grill (and the Daily Grill) restaurant used Tadich as a template for the ambiance they wanted to create. It is worth visiting when you are in San Francisco even if you don’t eat there. A long counter, curtained boots, a high pressed ceiling, all male waitstaff. A big plate of San Francisco sourdough bread and butter put before you when you sit down.

The restaurant itself does not discriminate against any customer based on race religion or ethnicity, but the prices are sufficiently high that it is out of reach of anyone below middle class income.

The Tadich Grill bills itself as “the original cold day restaurant.” They should now amend it to “the original cold white day restaurant.” The article references Supreme Court Justices eating there. My guess is they would be Anthony Kennedy who is from Sacramento and Steven Breyer who is also from San Francisco (and comes from a wealthy family: Breyer’s Ice Cream was founded by their father or grandfather.)

Robert Levine posts on FB: I hope all my friends in the DC area will boycott, if not take the time to picket, the new Tadich Grill.

Robert Levine Jabari, you & I are both former Washingtonians: I can’t decide whether Tadich Grill’s decision to open a location in a city whose permanent population in 90% black is idiotic in light of the Buichs’ bigotry or deliciously ironic.

Daniel Sayani Here’s a thought. If a frum Jewish family opened up a great kosher restaurant, and if they had a child who intermarried, and if the family disowned that child, would you also call upon the public to boycott the business?

Robert Levine No, Daniel, because that’s a religious prohibition. Judaism prohibits Jews from marrying non-Jews. Nothing prohibits whites from marrying blacks.

Daniel Sayani I had a feeling you would say that. Don’t you find that to be hypocritical? This family’s set of values is intolerant of miscegenation. Many Jewish families oppose miscegenation of a Jew and goy. Trying to distinguish the two on logical grounds minus the influence of tribalism and religion just won’t hold up. How do you know this family’s religious beliefs don’t preclude accepting an interracial marriage? I always say don’t expect from others what you won’t do yourself.

COMMENTS AT WP:

* Very poor reporting for this article. Upshaw was still married when he met this woman. They carried on the affair from 1983 – 1986 when he finally divorced his first wife in 1986. The first wife was found dead in 2002 in Oklahoma under suspicious circumstances. To have his second wife only to bring up just certain facts to make her family look bad now shows the evil and spite she has for them now. The next WP does an article like this, can they teach their reporters how to be journalists first?

* This so-called article is a waste of space. Families have disowned offspring for marrying people of whom they disapproved for thousands of years.

The attempt to equate this situation with daily societal racism is severely flawed. Just because parents want their grandchildren to look like them does not mean that they hate blacks, protestants, catholics, jews, muslims, italians, south americans, native americans, whites, asians or anybody else.

Additionally, it appears that the parents simply said don’t contact us again. They did not mount a campaign to destroy her. The daughter, however, must feel that her parents did not have the right to make this decision and is going to drag 80 year olds through the court of PC public opinion. It sounds as though the daughter has a problem.

* And my parents disowned me when I married out of their religion. Will the WP please do a story on ME?

What a waste of space. Families do this sh*t – since the beginning of time. How is this really news or anyone’s business except feeding the attention Wh*re who brought it up years later?

* My dear friend Monica, an African-American woman, refused to date black men because she said they treated women badly. She married a white man. Does that make her a racist?

* It is not a crime to tell your child that if you marry someone they don’t like that you will not speak with them again. The woman had a choice and she made her decision. She should simply live with it and leave her parents alone, as they have left her alone.

* Ultimately, this really is nobody’s business except for the families.

Why people go public with this stuff is simply beyond me.

I file it all away under the continued “Gracelessness of America.”

* Well played kill shot to your family’s restaurant. No one knew about this, no one CARED. I bet this article would not have been written if the family did not open a DC branch. Revenge may take time, but she got it. Well played.

* The purpose of this article is destroy the family’s business. Nice.

* So it appears based on a large % if not majority of comments that Ms. Upshaw’s torpedoes to the SS Tadich have holed it at the water line re patrons boycotting.

I’m guessing that if you personally knew the proprietors of a lot of family owned businesses, particularly bars and restaurants, you’d find an awful lot of jerks, but most of them don’t have somebody reaching out to the press to undermine their business.

Is there any history that Tadich discriminates against black employees/patrons?

* I guess we will now be bombarded with stories of various religious intolerance, honor killings, daughters sold into marriages and on and on. Um, probably not.

* For those who are all too quick to judge others, consider this. I grew up in a working class neighborhood in an Italian-American home next door to a family of Orthodox Jews. When their son decided to marry a gentile, the parents not only disowned him, but said Shiva for him,meaning he was dead to the family, DEAD. These were kind, otherwise loving people who followed an ancient cultural/religious tradition. Was this racist? Should we condemn them for such a practice? Is a family justified to consider its own common values, even if they do not meet popular approval? Did the son not also reap what his decision sewed?

* Assuming this story does eventually fact check and is by and large true, I don’t know how this restaurant is going to recover, I mean, you are situated in probably two of the most liberal cities in America. Even if they were to have an “epiphany” and welcome back their daughter and grandchildren, who is NOT going to think they are even worse people for going with a fake acceptance only after their livelihood has been threatened. I mean, if you’ve had 30+ years to come to terms and only do it now . . .

* A large plate of revenge, served cold, is now on the menu at Tadich Grill. While I have complete respect for the choices Mrs. Upshaw has made in how she lived her life, it seems she has pulled out an old axe, had some help from Ms. O’Neal in grinding it razor sharp and has now decided to serve a heaping portion of raw meat to the internet with the goal of shutting the restaurant down. And I can’t say I blame her, but let’s not pretend the goal of Mrs Upshaw and the reporter is to shine the warm light of tolerance on all the dark corners of racism left in the world. This is a hit piece.

* This should not have been printed. It’s a one-sided attack on the woman’s family as racists, based on nothing but the woman’s statements. Reaching out to the other side for a comment is not enough here. They could legitimately decide not to comment just because it’s a private family matter – maybe they simply don’t want to get into family issues through the Washington Post. There is no public interest here – this is a private family matter – none of the family is a politician or celebrity. The family, with a restaurant, are also highly vulnerable to injury based on this story. You have to question this woman’s motives in going public on something like this, which she knew would hurt the family economically. WaPo is better than this.

COMMENTS ON SFGATE.com:

* I am not excusing her family (as I am black). Before we all give her a complete round of applause, read the online [alleged various accounts the Upshaws and others] of Gene Upshaw’s will or was it really his Will…which details the wife’s and attorney plus his wife’s action as Upshaw last moments.The first son had sue to ensure his rights. Per accounts, Upshaw signed a new will moments before dying despite questionable medical condition leaving everything to her. Witnessed by attorney and wife, who then later changed their written statements. I just don’t find her hands to be completely clean. It would be most interesting to understand/know the whole story. Upshaw’s first marriage of near twenty years ended the same year of their marriage. Six years later, the former wife’ skeletal remains were found in Afton, Ok, died strangely in a town where no one knew her alone in a field with a slight nod to mental issues. Upshaw represented NFL players and came out financially (15M) better than the players, unbeknownst to the players he represented (revealed after him death).

* How in the world is this considered journalism? All you have is the statement of one person who claims that the reason the family shunned her is because her husband was black. But for all we know, she could have been a druggie or a jerk to her parents. Without a statement from her family (or corroboration from another source involved) this is just rumor mongering that could seriously adversely affect a business.

* Hey, look! Total strangers are taking to Yelp to intervene in a family dispute by lying about their experiences, online. Once again, Yelp is a haven for petulant reprobates.

* No different than when orthodox Jews marry non-Jews, Hindus marrying non-Hindus, or Muslims marrying non-Muslims. There are always those families who disapprove. It just happens that this family is known in SF because of their restaurant.

Posted in Blacks, Race | Comments Off on WP: Terri Upshaw says she had to choose between family and love

Do Blacks Want To Be Policed By Whites?

Different groups tend to have different norms, different evolutionary group strategies, and so when you have diversity, you have conflict.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Ultimately the black community does not want to be policed. We do hear about blacks calling for the police to “do something” about crime, but then they circle the wagons around extremely unsympathetic characters like Mike Brown, Kajieme Powell, Trayvon Martin, etc.

* (You can add OJ Simpson to that list).

Totally agree. Blacks want to opt out of what civilized societies require in terms of keeping the peace. The problem is that white guys (and now girls as well) want to be the hard ass savior/warrior. It is why whites join the armed forces in vast majorities despite the fact that the US government and the people really do not care how they are treated once their service is finished (ever been in a V.A.? talk about medieval….). The same with police. That white guy should have not gone near that girl with a 10 foot pole. But he just couldn’t help himself trying to be the keeper of all that is good. He is one dumb ass and now he is going to pay. Wouldn’t walking out and getting a doughnut have made more sense once he confronted the situation? Hell yes….

MORE COMMENTS:

* But being an ever-shrinking minority won’t stop the scapegoating. With South Africa’s economy hitting the skids, MSM outlets are laying the rhetorical groundwork for some ugly stuff. Whites are now <9% of SA's population and <5% of births (facts not disclosed in either of these articles), but they're STILL messing everything up for the equalists!* Sprinkling migrants around is what Germany is doing these days. Thousands a day pull into the Munich train station. They are fed, watered and loaded on other buses and trains that fan out on five major routes across Germany. They are distributed in small groups to villages, in bigger bunches to town, and in mobs to cities. A perfect testbed for the Chetty/Brooks Plan.Why don’t we see how Germany does with their massive Chetty/Brooks integration and improvement program before we start gathering up all the blacks in Detroit, St. Louis and Chicago and busing them out to the sticks?Somehow I think that the Chetty/Brooks Plan is going to require hundreds of billions of dollars in incentives (read “bribes”) to persuade black folks to move, onesies and twosies, out to the sticks to live with white folks.Every rural town can have its own fully subsidized Negro family, hanging around like cigar store Indians.Why in the world would any white or Negro American listen to any of the foolishness these Indians and Jews come up with? What on earth do they know of us? Let them solve the grotesque problems of their national homelands before they diddle with us. Israel and India (Pakistan?) would be wonderful testbeds.

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off on Do Blacks Want To Be Policed By Whites?

The Dhimmi Church of Sweden

From Gates of Vienna: As reported here last weekend, a controversy has arisen in Sweden over the inability of candidates for the office archbishop in the Swedish Church to affirm that Jesus Christ presented a truer picture of God than Mohammed.

One of the illustrious clerics who seemed all too willing to blur the distinctions between Christianity and Islam was the front-runner Antje Jackelén, who has since been elected to become the new archbishop. Our Swedish correspondent LN has translated several articles about the controversy, beginning with an overview of the theologian Eva Hamberg, who left the church rather than be a party to the encroachment of “Chrislam”.

Unfortunately, like so many other Scandinavian institutions — political parties, media outlets, and most private charitable organizations — the Swedish church is state-funded. This means that most non-state alternatives are competitively hobbled, and remain largely vestigial. Ms. Hamberg may thus find it hard to obtain a new, paying position in any non-PC Christian church in Sweden.

A translation from Fria Tider:

Theologian: “Swedish Church has no future”

As a Christian, it is wise to leave the increasingly secularized Swedish church, says Eva Hamberg, a former priest and well-known theologian.

Last week the priest and professor Eva Hamberg left the Swedish church, which she believes has been secularized and politicized to an extent that she can not endorse.

The Straw that broke the camel’s back for Hamberg was the hearing before the archbishop election, when only one of the candidates clearly answered yes to the question if Jesus gives a truer picture of God than Muhammad.

That the Liberal candidate Antje Jackelén yesterday was appointed to become Archbishop Anders Wejryd’s successor has not got Hamberg to look optimistic on the future of the Swedish Church.

“When believers begin to leave, it becomes difficult for the church to maintain its legitimacy. I do not think it has got a future,” says Hamberg to Sydsvenskan.

She says that she has received numerous emails from both clergy and laity expressing understanding for her decision to leave the church and they says that they are planning to do the same.

When asked if she is still a Christian responds Hamberg “Oh yes, that’s why I’m leaving.”

Until 1996, all Swedes automatically became members of the Swedish church at birth. Members of the Swedish church annual pay church tax on an average of one percent of their income. Anyone who is a member of the Swedish Church on November 1 has to pay church tax for the following year.

To exit the Swedish Church

It’s very easy to quit the church; you report your withdrawal to your local parish. You can visit, call or write to your church and ask for a form of exit. There is no cost for terminating your membership.

If you regret it, you are welcome to become a member again.

A brief excerpt from an interview with the new PC and very Islam-friendly archbishop, from Svenska Dagbladet:

Religious diversity is an asset

Sweden’s new archbishop Antje Jackelén wants to see more cooperation with Muslim, Jewish and other religious organizations. And the Swedish church can expect to continue to lose members, she says in an interview with the Svenska Dagbladet.

“The church continues to lose members. How can it be stopped?”

“Stopped and stopped. It is clear that anyone who leaves the church is a loss to the church community.”

The Islam-critical and anti-PC site Avpixlat presents a different perspective:

New archbishop has “Allahu akhbar” as motto

Islamization of the Church

As feared, the politically correct and religion-relativistic bishop of Lund, Antje Jackelén, was elected new archbishop of the Swedish Church.

In interviews she now says that she in her new ministry will push for more cooperation with Muslim organizations.

This is in line with her personal motto which is a direct translation of the Muslim war cry of “Allahu akhbar”, i.e. “God is greater”, and which is also the title of a book she has published.

It created an uproar when the influential theologian Eva Hamberg announced the other day her renunciation of the priesthood, leaving the Swedish Church after Jackelén and the other candidates for archbishop equated during the hearing that preceded the election the good judgment of the Muslim prophet Muhammad with Jesus.

Posted in Christianity, Sweden | Comments Off on The Dhimmi Church of Sweden

WORLD’S FIRST LESBIAN BISHOP CALLS FOR CHURCH TO REMOVE CROSSES, TO INSTALL MUSLIM PRAYER SPACE

Breitbart: The Bishop of Stockholm has proposed a church in her diocese remove all signs of the cross and put down markings showing the direction to Mecca for the benefit of Muslim worshippers.

Eva Brunne, who was made the world’s first openly lesbian bishop by the church of Sweden in 2009, and has a young son with her wife and fellow lesbian priest Gunilla Linden, made the suggestion to make those of other faiths more welcome.

The church targeted is the Seamen’s mission church in Stockholm’s eastern dockyards. The Bishop held a meeting there this year and challenged the priest to explain what he’d do if a ship’s crew came into port who weren’t Christian but wanted to pray.

Calling Muslim guests to the church “angels“, the Bishop later took to her official blog to explain that removing Christian symbols from the church and preparing the building for Muslim prayer doesn’t make a priest any less a defender of the faith. Rather, to do any less would make one “stingy towards people of other faiths”.

The bishop insisted this wasn’t an issue, after all airports and hospitals already had multi-faith prayer rooms, and converting the dockyard church would only bring it up to speed. Regardless, the announcement has aroused protest.

Father Patrik Pettersson, one of the priests in her diocese and active in the same parish as the Seaman’s mission church has hit back in a blog of his own, complaining there is no way you could equate a consecrated church with a prayer room, remarking “I should have thought a bishop would be able to tell the difference”.

Calling the bishop’s words “theologically unthinking”, he asked what was to be done with crucifixes screwed to the walls, and heavy items such as baptismal fonts.

“Ignoring the rhetorical murmuring”, Pettersson wrote: “The only argument bishop Eva really put forward in support of her view is ‘hospitality’… How do you respond to that? Not much of a basis for discussion, as one colleague put it. The theological, ecclesiological, pastoral and working issues are left untouched”.

The actual priest at the Seaman’s mission was left nonplussed by the comments of the Bishop when contacted by Dagen.se for comment.

As an independent mission the church operates outside of the diocese, and so the bishop has no authority there, a fact reflected by the response of the church director who said the bishop’s words were her business alone.

When asked whether she would be removing the cross from her church, Kiki Wetterberg responded: “I have no problem with Muslim or Hindu sailors coming here and praying. But I believe that we are a Christian church, so we keep the symbols. If I visit a mosque I do not ask them to take down their symbols. It’s my choice to go in there”.

The upper echelons of the Church of Sweden, much like other national churches across Europe, seem to be fully invested in the diversity mission. Back in February, a parish church in multicultural paradise Malmö declared it would be holding a service in solidarity with the local Muslim community as a protest against a march by anti-Islamisation movement PEGIDA in the city.

The priest responsible told media: “During the protest, the Swedish Church is going to hold a service where we express joy for our city and our Muslim friends.

“There is strong support for diverse cultures in Malmö and it is important that the church is there to support that”.

Malmö is Sweden’s gateway to Europe, and is the main point of ingress to the Nordic nations for the thousands of migrants travelling through Europe from Africa and the East who have decided to make it home.

As a major bottleneck into the region, with a single bridge and ferry route connecting the country to the rest of Europe, the arrival of these migrants has heralded an unprecedented level of criminality in the city, as explained to Breitbart London by a recently retired senior police officer last month. Describing the ‘no-go’ zones that have sprung up around the city and calling for greater border controls to get criminal migration under control, Chief Superintendent Torsten Elofsson said:

“Years ago you could go with two officers, no problem. Now you have to send four officers and two cars – if the fire brigade want to go, they have to take a police escort. They throw stones and try to stop the fireman from putting out fires.

“They sabotage the police cars. You can’t leave them unguarded – when you come back to it you find the windows smashed and the tyres deflated. It isn’t quite a no-go zone, but we have had to develop special routines to go there”.

Posted in Islam, Sweden | Comments Off on WORLD’S FIRST LESBIAN BISHOP CALLS FOR CHURCH TO REMOVE CROSSES, TO INSTALL MUSLIM PRAYER SPACE

Should American College Campuses Permit Criticism Of Israel?

I believe all groups, including Jews, benefit from accurate criticism and from the accurate and appropriate placement of stigma.

I welcome debates about Israel and Jews and blacks and Muslims and Christians, on campus and off.

Ex-CIA officer Philip Giraldi (with whom I usually disagree substantially but I nevertheless always feel a benefit from reading him, and I believe he makes some good points below) writes:

On October 23rd, the op-ed section outdid itself with a piece “Free speech is flunking out on campus” by Catherine Rampell, who described the increasingly sorry state of first amendment rights on politically correct American university campuses. Blacks, LGBTers, women and victims of sexual assault were all identified as constituencies demanding “safe spaces” resulting in curtailment of free speech but somehow Israel and its supporters screaming anti-Semitism at every drop of the hat were left out in spite of the fact that Jews on campus have been both extremely and successfully active in taking political action to pressure universities whenever they claim to feel “threatened.”

…Friends of Israel, as ever, work from the same playbook orchestrated by the large donors who fund them. They claim that anti-Israel protests on campus to include even letters to the editor in college newspapers constitute a “threatening environment” for Jewish students. The argument is based on a fundamental falsehood, which is that criticism of the actions of a foreign government is equivalent to hatred for the dominant religion of that country, that religion is exactly the same as nationality. Applying that notion liberally would mean that criticism of any country where there is de facto or de jure a dominant state religion would be unacceptable speech. If applied liberally countries spanning the globe would be exempt from criticism, to include not only Israel but also Saudi Arabia and Iran.

But this is not about Christian or Muslim sensitivities. It is all about protection against insult for Jews and it relies on a perception of perpetual victimhood, which can be and is produced on demand to stifle any criticism that might be regarded by some as objectionable. Indeed, if calls for violence directed against Jews as a race or religion were occurring pleas for some form of mitigation might have some very slim cogency, but campus protest movements have very carefully and deliberately avoided falling into that trap. And it might also be pointed that on many campuses a considerable proportion of the dissenters are themselves Jews who are appalled by Israeli behavior.

Criticism of Israel does not just include complaining about the policies of that country’s government. It also has inevitably involved the so-called BDS movement, “boycott-divest-and sanction” which aims to make Israel pay an economic and social price for its behavior, similar to the pressure that was once directed against apartheid South Africa. This second narrative has been cleverly woven into the complaints about “harassment,” labeling any campus calls for BDS ipso facto anti-Semitic and “hurtful.” School authorities have generally been accommodating to claims made by Jewish groups that students are feeling “threatened,” obstructing and intimidating critics of Israel and denying tenure to faculty members who are seen as troublemakers. They have looked the other way as organizations like Canary Mission began exposing college students on its website who are reported to be “anti-Freedom, anti-American and anti-Semitic” with the deliberate intention of damaging their future employment prospects.

Between January 2014 and June 2015 there were more than 300 incidents on 65 college campuses in 24 states involving intimidation or prevention of protests against Israel. Students at Northeastern University distributing flyers at dorms were interrogated by campus police and had their group suspended by college authorities. Some were disciplined. And faculty members have also been on the receiving end, with Steven Salaita at the University of Illinois, denied a teaching position after he sent tweets complaining about Israel’s 2014 assault against Gaza which killed more than 500 children.

Richard Blum, a member of the University of California’s regents, has demanded that students who criticize Israel be suspended for expelled because they are “intolerant,” exhibiting anti-Semitic bigotry. Blum is the multimillionaire husband of California Senator Dianne Feinstein. Feinstein has also hinted that she could have the government look into possible violations occurring at federally funded institutions. The definition of bigotry being promoted by Blum and Feinberg conflates criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism and includes in its purview what are increasingly being referred to as “speech crimes.” The university regents are currently considering new language for their statement of policy against intolerance on campus but are under intense pressure from Jewish organizations that are lobbying them aggressively.

Many of the groups involved in the harassment of pro-Palestinian demonstrators are perhaps not surprisingly not indigenous to the colleges themselves. Stand With Us (SWU) and “Campus Maccabees” are national organizations well-funded by billionaire Sheldon Adelson and SWU has close ties to the Israeli government as does the lawfare center Shurat HaDin, which has filed lawsuits against Muslim and progressive groups on campus. Predictably, Congress and state legislatures have gotten into the act, seeking to pass laws that make it impossible for colleges and universities supported by taxpayer money to fund student groups that call for boycotts. The bills are drafted in terms of rejecting all selective boycotts but they are really all about Israel and everyone knows it. The fact that advocating voluntary boycotts is very much a part of one’s First Amendment rights appears to be irrelevant.

How to deal with it? The brouhaha is impossible to ignore as the advocates for Israel are relentlessly in one’s face even when the argument is being constructed in a restrained fashion and purposely framed so as not to offend Jews. It is consequently necessary to disarticulate being Israeli from being Jewish. Judaism is a religion and Israel is a foreign country. And it is important to recognize that legitimate direct criticism of Jewish groups for their involvement in pressuring universities should not itself be off limits. If the organizations self-identify as Jewish and they are attempting to restrict the discussion on Israel contrary to the First Amendment they become fair game. The First Amendment exists, after all, to permit free and open discussion of all issues and if some Jewish individuals and organizations are mobilizing to deny fundamental American rights on behalf of a foreign nation the rest of us have the responsibility to object forcibly and to make transparent just who is doing what to whom.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on Should American College Campuses Permit Criticism Of Israel?

Rabbi: How the Middle East Conflict Is Warping Judaism

I think dealing with your own country is excellent for Judaism.

When Judaism did not have a state for nearly 1900 years, the religion turned inward and became obsessed with tiny rituals rather than the practicalities of running a nation-state.

When you have to earn a living, your observance of Judaism is more challenged than when you are supported by welfare. Reality is messy.

Jeremy Kalmanofsky is a rabbi at Ansche Chesed in Manhattan. He writes:

Jews must recognize that there are places in the Palestinian territories that are basically Mississippi in 1963 — places where the powerful may kill the powerless without fear of prosecution. (No one has been arrested yet in the Duma attack, although the authorities say they know who perpetrated it.)

Lest you think I am getting all hysterical and anti-Zionist on you, I assure you I am not. The scope of the problem was aptly described by former Shin Bet head Yuval Diskin in September, in an essay noting that dozens of messianic ultra-nationalists attack Palestinians every day, and that they and their hundreds of supporters have come to “set the tone for mainstream religious Zionism.” And I urge Hebrew readers to consult the searing Tisha B’Av dirge by Dov Halbertal, a Haredi attorney who bewailed the Duma attack among other dark trends, like the 100,000 votes in the last election that were cast for Baruch Marzel, the Kahanist thug who openly advocates expelling Arabs. “How have we reached this stage,” Halbertal wrote, “when religious and Haredi Judaism is becoming more and more violent? And it is not just a marginal fringe, but a large minority.”

I will remain a liberal Zionist until my dying day, even if I am the last one. In my humble view, given the events of the past 150 years, there is no credible alternative to Jews having power and learning to wield it responsibly. I’m just not sure we’re passing that test.

I know very well that the “price tag” perpetrators are not interested in what a liberal rabbi from Manhattan has to say. But since, as the Talmud states, every Jew is responsible for every other Jew, I am not free to ignore them. I remain responsible for the Torah. Jews of spirit and ethics must offer an alternative.

We are told that the Second Temple was destroyed because of sinat hinam, abundant, pointless hatred. Now, the remarkable Jewish society created in our ancestral homeland might likewise be destroyed by hatred — the kind found in the souls of those who hate Arabs and want to burn their homes, and those who hate secular Jews and want to destroy their values and sometimes their bodies (remember the murderous madness at the Jerusalem Gay Pride Parade).

As the senior Rabbi Kook taught, the only plausible response to abundant hatred is abundant love, ahavat hinam.

Posted in Israel, Judaism | Comments Off on Rabbi: How the Middle East Conflict Is Warping Judaism