Is birthright citizenship the right policy for the U.S.A. today?

John Derbyshire tackles Linda Chavez’s NY Post op/ed:

We have changed our collective mind about all sorts of things that our Constitution and laws once allowed—most notably slavery, of course. Perhaps we should change our minds about this. Is birthright citizenship a good thing for us today, or not? What are the arguments for it, as benefiting the U.S.A. and U.S. citizens? May we hear them, please?

Let’s hope we don’t need a Civil War to sort this one out.

At the time the 14th Amendment passed, there was considerable debate regarding groups that would be equivalent to today’s illegal immigrants, though the distinction between “legal” and “illegal” immigrants did not apply because no laws restricted immigration then.

Sen. Edgar Cowan, D-Pa., railed against those whose citizenship might be affirmed under the new amendment, calling for “expelling a certain number of people who invade her borders; who owe to her no allegiance; . .  . who pay no taxes; who never perform military service; who do nothing, in fact, which becomes the citizen, and perform none of the duties which devolve upon him.”

Sound familiar? But he wasn’t talking about Mexicans. “I mean the Gypsies,” he said.

If that’s what he meant, I must say, Sen. Cowan was talking good sense.

Another Cowan diatribe sounds eerily prescient of Trump’s warnings: “There is a race in contact with this country which, in all characteristics except that of simply making fierce war, is not only our equal, but perhaps our superior.”

This will be baffling to readers unfamiliar with 19th-century American anxieties. Why doesn’t she tell us which race Sen. Cowan meant? Is it over-suspicious of me to think that perhaps she left the race unidentified so that some subset of her readers would take the Senator’s remarks to have been anti-Semitic?

In fact Sen. Cowan clarified his meaning in his next sentence: “I mean the yellow race; the Mongol race.” He was expressing the common and perfectly reasonable fear that our Pacific coast, under-populated and remote from the centers of American civilization, would succumb to a mass influx from China, then populous at the Malthusian limit and in the throes of late-dynastic turmoil.

(Note that Sen. Cowan’s fears were founded in part on the belief that East Asians were “perhaps our superior.” A little later he says: “Of their industry, their skill, and their pertinacity in all worldly affairs, nobody can doubt.” The same fear of admitting great numbers of a superior race shows up in the congressional debates on Japanese exclusion in the 1920s. Racist? I guess so; but surely not “supremacist.”)

… Trump is dead wrong on birthright citizenship, and Republicans shouldn’t follow him down the rabbit hole.

Once again: If birthright citizenship is a good thing for our nation today, let’s hear the arguments.

If the legal/constitutional position is what Ms Chavez says it is, but no longer the right policy for our country, let’s change it, as other nations have done: Australia (2007), New Zealand (2005), Ireland (2005), France (1993), …

COMMENTS TO JOHN DERBYSHIRE:

* Anyone who is successful in a socio-political system that can be objectively viewed with suspicion, e.g. Latin America, the Middle East, Southern Europe, Russia, the Balkans, Subsaharan Africa and identitarian hustlers in the West, warrants suspicion. They’ve learned the techniques used to get on top. If you succeed in a highly corrupt environment, you surely didn’t get there squeaky clean or tainted no matter what your individual worth.

The problem is American whites just aren’t equipped to deal with it. Yes, we yell. Yes we also use public shaming as a socially conditioning technique. Yes we have white collar corruption. But let’s be honest, we have nothing on those cultures in which mistrust and amoral familism have permeated public life for centuries. Those same Americans who will scream at a politician at a Tea Party townhall will stand in line at any business and pay their taxes.

Why deal with that pathological crap if we can avoid it? The US has its own pathologies and they are numerous and pervasive, but that doesn’t mean should import others. And just because reform has been possible in the past with groups who came from corrupt societies, doesn’t mean it will always work.

I agree with liberals and leftists that the Constitution should reflect changing realities. I’d also say that the Declaration of Independence was hopelessly naive, written by a young, dreamy Virginian subject to flights of fancy, even if he could turn a fancy phrase. He was simultaneously one of the greatest minds our nation ever produced, whose ideas are models for us all, and a dangerous fool who should have never been allowed within twenty feet of pen or paper.

Corruption indices, poverty as indicator of corruption and poor leadership, anthropological studies that indicate if a society is plagued by extreme misogyny, low levels of trust, amoral familism or tribal/clan nepotism. Of the list I gave, YOU give me an example of ONE of country that is by any objective standard mostly liberal with a transparent government and whose indigenous cultures are committed to impartial meritocracy.

Who said “white” America? That’s your little addition, channeling Professor Ignatiev, are you? Indeed Latin America has been historically ruled (or misruled) by a white or almost white elite. Eastern Europeans are white.

Naive, yes. The Declaration of Independence should have been very specific. It should have used specific language limiting its claims to the American community as was. We could have incorporated later arrivals, but we would have much more control over the rate of incorporation and the terms on which they joined without being charged with hypocrisy and our indigenous leftist elements and cheap labor lobbies and war-mongerers would not have had such a strong propagandistic tool.

But that’s Jefferson for you. All high-minded ideas, but not concerned with minor details. That fool committed us to all sorts of crap with his “all men.” Same goes for the 14th Amendment. It should have been much clearer and more specific, i.e. “we hereby grant citizenship to former slaves, who were held by in the territories of the US, excluding former slaves from foreign territories (e.g. West Indians like Louis Farrakhan, Colin Powell or Eric Holder), and their descendants.”

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on Is birthright citizenship the right policy for the U.S.A. today?

L.A. Illegals` Welfare Access: Laura Ingraham Correctly Raises Anchor Baby Issue

From VDARE in 2013: One of the genuine Patriotic heroes of the American Immigration disaster has done it again:

A projected $650 million in welfare benefits will be distributed to illegal alien parents in 2013, county officials said Monday.

Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich announced the latest figures from the Department of Public Social Services….An estimated 100,000 children of 60,000 undocumented parents receive aid in Los Angeles County, according to Antonovich

“When you add the $550 million for public safety and nearly $500 million for healthcare, the total cost for illegal immigrants to county taxpayers exceeds $1.6 billion dollars a year,” Antonovich said in a statement. “These costs do not even include the hundreds of millions of dollars spent annually for education

Undocumented LA County Parents On Pace To Receive $650M In Welfare Benefits CBS Los Angeles September 16, 2013 (VDARE.com emphasis)

Antonovich has been making a habit of collecting and compiling these figures, as I noted in 2011 in Drudge Scores Twofer: Immigrant/American Job Grab, and Anchor Baby Costs and last year in Antonovich Raises Anchor Baby Costs Again. Where Is Congressional GOP?

In a healthy political climate this enterprising work would have made Republican Antonovich a strong GOP candidate for statewide office rather than pitiful morons like Meg Whitman.

But this is Mexifornia where, thanks to a critical degree to treasonous forces within the GOP, Mexican mestizos have been allowed to achieve the most spectacular migratory conquest since their ancestors crossed the Bering Strait.

Applaud Michael Antonovich

As usual, Antonovich’s work has been ignored by most of the MSM even in California. But a Point-and Splutter at MediaMatters Conservative Media`s Misplaced Hysteria Over Immigrants And Welfare by Solange Uwimana September 18 2013 notes several “Right-wing” websites did pick it up and also the wonderful Laura Ingraham who

…read the news on her radio show and used it to call for the end of birthright citizenship — which, under the 14th Amendment, makes anyone born in this country an American citizen. She also argued that the news should end all talk of immigration reform.

Of course, she is right.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on L.A. Illegals` Welfare Access: Laura Ingraham Correctly Raises Anchor Baby Issue

White Riot

Brett Stevens writes: Diversity creates racism. It does so by forcing groups into competition when they would rather live among their own and have self-determination, or the ability to rule themselves and choose their own future. Racism creates rancor, and if there is a perceived economic or power imbalance, it creates race warfare.

That is what is happening on the streets of America today. Currently, it is white-vs-black drama, but this will soon expand to include other groups, even those that like Hispanic indios and Asians tend to use more indirect methods. Speaking of indirect methods, check out the response. After years of being silenced by accusations of “racism,” white people are mobilizing in protest.

One night after Deputy Darren Goforth was executed at the Chevron station in Houston, over a thousand people gathered at the site to memorialize the man who was apparently murdered simply because he wore a police uniform, as reported by Breitbart Texas. Thousands more gathered on Sunday night to walk the streets in the suburban neighborhood where he was killed.

As reported by Breitbart Texas, the escalation of anti-white and anti-cop rhetoric has been building since militant black activists began marching in support of #BlackLivesMatter after the suicide of Sandra Bland. At protests at the jail where Bland killed herself, a radical activist called for all white people to be killed, and heavily armed members of the New Black Panther Party chanted “the revolution has started … off the pigs.” A Texas-based internet radio show called for the lynching of whites and the killing of police officers. Last week, two white journalists and a white deputy sheriff have been assassinated by blacks who appear to be carrying out the message of hate.

White people favor indirect methods. They prefer to march, sing bad folk songs on acoustic guitar, wave signs and write letters. They show up for midnight vigils. They produce (endless) blogs and editorials. And let us not forget the first-person novels. This is how someone accustomed to a European-style society registers displeasure. They do not achieve displeasure without first having doubts and fears, and when all of those come together, an emotional wave sweeps the population. (Then they usually choose the wrong option based on other fears and that dreaded hallmark of all failure, moral laziness).

For a population that only a decade ago was afraid to discuss race at all, this is a big shift, even a sea change, if you will. The cat is out of the bag and the dissent is spreading.

Posted in Whites | Comments Off on White Riot

Rename All The Mountains

Brett Stevens writes: Our identity is WASP, which is (in the New World) shorthand for Western European. This population is distinct from Eastern and Southern European as well as outliers like the Irish, who have an Iberian-North African descended strain in them and group genetically with Southern Europeans. This identity is what saves us from all the methods of liberalism like big government, equality, feminism, diversity, deviance norming and social breakdown. We must always assert this identity strongly because among us there are unhappy people and neurotics who will always and pathologically work to destroy it….

Obama renamed Mt. McKinley in order to damage the self-esteem and self-image of Western Europeans in the new world. He wants them to feel like a subjugated people, which is the necessary consequence of having foreign names around them. In particular, he wants to re-inforce the guilt narrative regarding the people he calls “Native Americans” or “First Nations” when they are in fact neither. The most likely scenario for Amerinds, as they are technically called, is that multiple groups came over from the old world, but the group from Siberia was most numerous and out-reproduced the others. Obama hopes for a similar fate for America and Europe, as do all liberals, which is why beating back “racism” and adopting massive third world immigration has been the central focus of their activity in the postwar period.

As Robert Frost noted when he penned “Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,” life often produces binaries when a choice comes down to the line. We cannot use a method here of imposing categorical logic by saying “all binaries are bad,” but should note that at some point one either chooses to act toward what is right, or accepts whatever else comes down the pipe. What is right in this case is asserting our cultural identity exclusively because it is necessary for our survival, and failing to do so will only produce another mixed-heritage third world burnout of a former empire. It may be most convenient to use some familiar names, or to cuckold ourselves as Obama desires we do, but the right thing to do waits for no man. It is an opportunity either seized or a defeat and self-destruction slowly but certainly growing near.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Rename All The Mountains

Our Struggle

What we are trying to fix is to avoid being thrown en masse into a pit of death because of the machinations of a tiny tiny number of our tribe. That’s what affiliated Jews call, “self-hating.” When you try to slow down the push for conflict and martyrdom.

That’s why we need Jews for Consistency.

How can one change the world? I see some options.

* You can come to peace with yourself and radiate your happiness outward.
* You can contribute to your community and build up your people and your country.
* You can have great kids and raise them right.
* You can propound good ideas and shed light on complicated matters so that increased clarity in the world leads to decreased unnecessary suffering.

I try to make the world a better place by improving myself, improving my own happiness and inner peace, improving my finances and my health and my psyche, being of service to others (both to those in my Orthodox Jewish community and to others), improving my place in the world so that I can marry and have children, and I try through my writing to promote good ideas and to shed light on complicated matters.

I don’t feel much of a conflict between my allegiance to my group (Orthodox Jews) and to my search for universal truths. I don’t want anything for my group that I do not want for other groups. I think ethno-nationalism is good for everyone. I believe that each people has special gifts and has a special role to play in the world. Aborigines and Jews, for instance, have very different gifts and are probably not well suited to living amongst each other.

It is equally important to me that Jews prosper and that non-Jewish Europeans prosper even though it seems like in history, the fortunes of these two groups often go in opposite directions (i.e., that the stronger and more cohesive whites are, the more vulnerable Jews are, and the stronger Jews are, the less cohesive and strong whites are). This strikes me as tragic.

I often have trouble talking about these ideas with people because ties “bind and blind” to quote Jonathan Haidt. The stronger your group identity, the more difficult it is for you to see things objectively. The more you identify with your group, the more likely you are to fear and dislike outsiders. The more beliefs you hold and the more strongly you hold them, the more protected and armored you are against observing reality objectively. Almost all beliefs are simply unnecessary muscular tension. Several times a day, I make a deliberate effort to let go of my beliefs so that for a minute or two, I can see the world with fresh eyes, freed of the compression that goes with my belief system. I usually notice my neck and back and face freeing up as I let go of commitments, my breath frees up, and movement and observation become easier. Without this practice, I tend to live top-down 95% of the time, with my cognitive commitments framing everything I encounter in reality so that life becomes drained of surprise and joy.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Our Struggle

Steve Sailer: What Do Milwaukee, St. Louis, Baltimore, Washington, and New Orleans Have in Common?

Steve Sailer comments on the New York Times article: What do these five cities with fast growing homicide rates in 2015 v. 2014 have in common: Milwaukee, New Orleans, Baltimore, Washington, and St. Louis?

They are all cities where the vast majority of homicides are committed by blacks, and these tend to be particularly troubled black communities. The problems of Wisconsin blacks are a long-time iSteve focus, while David Simon has devoted much of his TV career to the problems of Baltimore and New Orleans blacks.

So, one possibility is that when the Obama Administration encourages blacks to feel aggrieved, blacks in the worst black slums respond to their leadership’s urgings by murdering each other in even larger numbers than normal.

Heckuva job, Obammie!

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: What Do Milwaukee, St. Louis, Baltimore, Washington, and New Orleans Have in Common?

Our Life Scripts

Therapist Rinda Hall says: “We recreate our deepest childhood wounds in our relationships. Our life scripts have set the scene. Unconsciously, we employ other people to recreate the pain we suffered growing up. If you were abandoned, you set the stage to be abandoned throughout your life. Your life script tells you that you are flawed and that you do not deserve to be loved, honored or respected. However faulty this thinking is, we recreate it in our lives…”

Posted in Addiction | Comments Off on Our Life Scripts

Can Dogs Be Racist?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* “It’s a real phenomenon. Lots of dogs treat Blacks differently.

Never heard anything about cats, though.”

Are you joking or you serious? Are you talking about police dogs? Because they attack thugs regardless of race, ethnicity, or color.

Maybe you have seen this film one too many times.

* I suppose you could say that a dog owned by a white person picks up on their “owners” inherent racism or fear or something, and reacts to a black person based upon what the dog’s perceives as their owner’s agitation.

But I’ve seen this effect before. Blacks, at least the ones I’ve known are very uncomfortable around dogs. And I think the dog picks up on that.

I can’t say I know much about other ethnicities and dogs, but I can tell you white people are a lot more comfortable around them. Whether that is genetic… hell I don’t know. Seems like everything is genetic around here. Russians are probably genetically selected to play chess or something.

But going back to the dogs, it is a real thing. If you’ve actually spent much time around both your would have observed it.

Be kind of interesting to see if this is cultural, or whether there is something else going on with it. I’d tend to think it is cultural, mainly because I don’t have the slightest idea of what else it could be.

* If you have a dog in your yard and the sons of Obama snoop around your house, nothing may get stolen because you have a dog. However, your dog is going to get trained real quick that dark skin and negro smell (and every race has a smell – if Mongoloids can smell white people and we can smell subcontinentals, dogs can probably break it down to ethnicities) equals suspicious character. Basic Skinner.

* It’s a real phenomenon. Lots of dogs treat Blacks differently.

Probably nurture, and not specific to blacks. Dogs raised by whites (with few blacks around) see blacks as odd and therefore threatening, and vice versa.

Are you joking or you serious? Are you talking about police dogs? Because they attack thugs regardless of race, ethnicity, or color.

No, he’s serious. Well, racist dogs are a real thing, anyway.

I suppose you could say that a dog owned by a white person picks up on their “owners” inherent racism or fear or something, and reacts to a black person based upon what the dog’s perceives as their owner’s agitation.

Maybe. But the behavior applies to dogs with owners nowhere to be seen. The fact that blacks have a very different skin color, and a very different smell, would probably be exhibit A. Dogs usually establish their owners as the baseline, and if they aren’t accustomed to the differences…

But I’ve seen this effect before. Blacks, at least the ones I’ve known are very uncomfortable around dogs. And I think the dog picks up on that.

That too (everybody knows the best way to get a dog to give chase is to run), but again, it’s not specific to blacks. Dogs raised in the ghetto don’t much like whites (I don’t suppose too many of the commenters here have clocked much time in the ghetto).

* [gawker] Why Are Dogs Racist? Canine Experts Speak

Pa. police dog suspended for potential racism


[Daily Mail]

Not colorblind: New report shows ‘racist’ LA police dogs only bite blacks and Latinos



A new report on the Canine Special Detail of the LA Sheriff’s Department (LASD) shows that police dogs bite a disproportionately large number of minority suspects.

According to the Police Assessment Resource Centre (PARC) report, the number of Latino people bitten by LASD dogs went up 30 per cent between 2004 and 2012 and the number of African Americans bitten rose 33 per cent.



Also noted by the report is the low or non-existent incidence of dog bites in affluent areas with smaller minority populations.

A new report on the Canine Special Detail of the LA Sheriff’s Department (LASD) shows that police dogs bite a disproportionately large number of minority suspects.

Everyone in LA County is a minority. There are almost twice as many Mexicans as Whites, yet this moron Alex Greig claims that Whites at 27% are a majority.

Posted in Pets, Race | Comments Off on Can Dogs Be Racist?

The Daily Mail’s Race Realism

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* The daily mail is doing an amazing job combining honest race reporting with the type of celebrity click bait that you have to have for mainstream success.

I checked out the owner, he might be on the list of the tiny number of billionaires who have not signed up for open boarders.

I wonder how much the social climbing press baron in Downton Abbey is based on his great grandfather.

Posted in Journalism, Race | Comments Off on The Daily Mail’s Race Realism

Steve Sailer: Victim Wasn’t Racist So She Didn’t Deserve to be Murdered

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Flanagan was an aggressive, obnoxious guy, who got away with being that way as long as he did because he was black.

* Not only was Vester Lee Flanagan bat shit crazy, but he also had a disgusting lifestyle. His apartment smelled really bad because it was full of feces and urine all over his kitchen floor and balcony.

He also claims in his manifesto that he killed all of his cats because he believes they were being racist towards him. This Negro sounds crazier than Buffalo Bill from Silence Of The Lambs. So animals are capable of being racist now?

* Back in the day, Black comedians like Eddie Murphy and Chris Rock often poked fun at Black hypersensitivity to racism. Rock had a skit where he played a Black militant who claimed, among other things, that the White Man created the racist game of pool where the white ball knocks all the colored balls off the table.

* I live in the South (don’t hold it against me) and that type of hypersensitivity is very common among blacks in the workplace. I once saw a black guy go to management because a white coworker, who was an Army veteran, had a “Freedom isn’t free” sign on his desk and the black guy claimed this was saying that blacks didn’t deserve to be free, therefore the guy was racist. My current black coworkers openly talk about looking for reasons to sue the company and you have to be very careful what you say around them. To make matters worse, there is a TV in our office and it is tuned to CNN 24/7. The last year has been very interesting to say the least. I’ve had the non-pleasure of watching Ferguson, Baltimore and Charleston unfold with them in real time. I work for a good company that pays well, has good benefits, and a lot of the blacks have college degrees, but they are still angry and hostile.

* White privilege = a level of intelligence that promotes a healthy society. The black cat enjoyed the same white privilege, like most blacks living in the states he was incapable of comprehending it.

* It’s been obvious from day one that he was a delusional paranoiac. That these innocuous phrases set him off puts him on a par with those celebrity stalkers who believe the actress is speaking secretly to them from the screen. It really says something about affirmative action that they even allowed this smoldering lunatic to hang around in any way.
It’s become a rather disgusting practice in cases such as this and the Thornton case whereby the unfortunate victims are besmirched and put under the magnifying glass as if they were the culprits. It’s a shameful thing to be forced to watch.

* Sounds like the guy thought Undercover Brother was a documentary.

* Reports say that Flanagan often flung cat feces in disputes with neighbors and that the police found cat feces smeared all over his apartment.

Maybe there is something to the supposed link with toxoplasmosis and mental illness. You cat lovers out there – be careful disposing of that cat litter!

* “Flanagan even declared that ­7-Eleven was racist because it sold watermelon-flavored Slurpees.”

Given the sainting of Michael Brown, lies about ‘hands up don’t shoot’, myth of white college ‘rape culture’, UVA lunacy, micro-aggression nuttiness, trigger alert nuttiness, mattress girl silliness, unarmed thugs, baby with skittles, paranoia about every confed flag(even to the point of censoring dukes of hazard), and etc, was Flanagan any crazier?

Only in having used a gun. Otherwise, his lunacy was very much in line with current culture where colleges say even words like ‘fathering’, ‘mothering’, ‘american’, and ‘homosexual’ are offensive.

And before we denounce Flanagan, consider all the ‘rational’ and ‘sane’ people who see nukes, ‘terrorists’, and WMD everywhere to warrant whole invasion/destruction of other nations. while they never see Israel’s nukes or its slaughter of Palestinians.

US is currently going postal on Russia, a nation that means no harm, because Jews see ‘new hitler’ in the ban on ‘gay’ parades.

And consider how Holder had to comb thru every square inch of Ferguson to find the incriminating ‘watermelon’.

* So much of the ‘progressive’ world view is simply Christianity shorn of the supernatural God figure. Its all there: we are born sinners who must constantly assuage our guilt for the wrongdoing of our people if we are to achieve redemption, the opportunity for moral piety and status competitions over who is more holy, the persecution of heretics and non-believers, flagellant moral masochism etc etc.
This guy’s warped imagining of racism in everyday speech and actions is also an echo of past Christian excess – the perception of others as being possessed by demons, to be witches or inherently evil, no matter how innocently their actions and words can be explained.
As Spengler said ‘Christianity is the grandmother of Bolshevism.’ Now that Christianity has been all but expunged from public life, we’re left with that hideous grandchild.

* “Micro-aggression racism is everywhere, all the time. Image after image on social media, in every possible form of media delivery, tells us that the only way to be good, the best, preferred, successful, smart is to be white. White strangers make unsolicited remarks about my hair as if it were a dazzling bird of paradise perched atop my head. Often when I bring up racial issues in white spaces, my family members, friends and/or colleagues answer with either silence or discomfort.”

* If you had a new black coworker over for dinner very few of you (if any) would serve watermelon or fried chicken.

How would you explain your decision to a reindeer herder from Lapland.

We decided not to serve watermelon and fried chicken because …

1. It means blacks are stupid?
2. It means blacks are lazy?
3. It means blacks came from the (eww) South?
4. Way back over 100 years ago, commercial illustrators drew pictures of black kids in raggedy clothes eating watermelon, and that clearly means … what, exactly?

Or because …:

5. Now that they have warned us that they take offense at watermelon and fried chicken for some unknown and apparently unknowable reason (but oddly enough, not grits, collard greens, and black-eyed peas) our serving them watermelon and fried chicken means we are deliberately trying to hurt their feelings.

The power to select and enforce magic words and things is nothing more than the Battered Woman Syndrome on a national, racial scale:

Husband gets mean drunk, comes home late. He walks in, finds something to get enraged about and slugs his meek little wife: “Goddammit, woman! You KNOW I hate it when you serve tea in a plastic glass!” She knows it really is her fault and promises to do better.

* He appeared to be a mulatto from the “talented tenth” – his father was a college dean. So he must have grown up in the toxic SJW environment of the college campus. Mulattoes can be the most dangerous kind of Negro because they sometimes combine the violence and amorality of the black with (some) of the superior intelligence of the white, depending on how the genetic dice roll. On a good day you get Colin Powell and on a bad day you get Vester. I won’t say what kind of day it was when Obama was born.

Flanagan apparently didn’t originally intend to kill himself and had formulated a getaway plan with wigs and disguises, etc. It wasn’t a very good plan but it was far beyond the planning abilities of say a Michael Brown or a Trayvon Martin who couldn’t play the chess game even one move ahead.

* I think we sometimes pay too much attention to IQ differences between peoples and not enough to the differing degrees of social cooperation between blacks and other races. Since much of what we call ‘civilization’ has been the result of people being able to subordinate their egos in order to function within a hierarchy those who lack that ability find themselves in conflict with authority.

European and Asian populations have lived in hierarchical societies for the past two thousand or so years. Those who found themselves in conflict with authority did not do well if they survived at all. Blacks have only been exposed to this type of social organization for, at best, a few hundred years and they aren’t very good at it. This has real consequences beyond the feelings of persecution or imagining ‘racism’ being the source of all one’s misfortunes. It limits one’s ability to accomplish anything of substance.

There are no black enterprises of any consequence anywhere in the world because blacks are incapable of organizing themselves in a hierarchical fashion that can produce, on a large scale, goods and services. For them hierarchy is all about a struggle for supremacy not a cooperative endeavor to advance the organization.

* A white female friend, a former on-camera personality on a local station who was let go when she reached a certain age, as well as a firmly-closeted lesbian, excoriated me for blaming the victims. I said I wasn’t, but I was blaming “nice HR ladies”. She had a bigger problem with that comment, saying that HR departments were not mostly female. I proceeded to introduce her to the facts available to anyone wanting them (about 70% of large HR departments are women, Freida Kapor, etc.), to which she responded by calling me a dick and blocking me!

* From the novel Dr. No: Later, over lunch in the mahogany-paneled Queen’s Club dining room, Jamaica’s Colonial Secretary provides James Bond, who has arrived from England to investigate, with a thumbnail racial sketch of the Caribbean island:

“It’s like this.” He began his antics with the pipe. “The Jamaican is a kindly lazy man with the virtues and vices of a child. He lives on a very rich island but he doesn’t get rich from it. He doesn’t know how to and he’s too lazy. The British come and go and take the easy pickings, but for about two hundred years no Englishman has made a fortune out here. He doesn’t stay long enough. He takes a fat cut and leaves. It’s the Portuguese Jews who make the most. They came here with the British and they’ve stayed. But they’re snobs and they spend too much of their fortunes on building fine houses and giving dances. They’re the names that fill the social column in the Gleaner when the tourists have gone. They’re in rum and tobacco and they represent the big British firms over here – motor cars, insurance and so forth. Then come the Syrians, very rich too, but not such good businessmen. They have most of the stores and some of the best hotels. They’re not a very good risk. Get overstocked and have the occasional fire to get liquid again. Then there are the Indians with their usual flashy trade in soft goods and the like. They’re not much of a lot. Finally there are the Chinese, solid, compact, discreet – the most powerful clique in Jamaica. They’ve got the bakeries and the laundries and the best food stores. They keep to themselves and keep their strain pure.” Pleydell-Smith laughed. “Not that they don’t take the black girls when they want them. You can see the result all over Kingston – Chigroes – Chinese Negroes or Negresses. The Chigroes are a tough, forgotten race. They look down on the Negroes and the Chinese look down on them. One day they may become a nuisance. They’ve got some of the intelligence of the Chinese and most of the vices of the black man. The police have a lot of trouble with them.”

* For that matter, about a quarter of lynching victims were white, but that doesn’t keep lynchings from being exclusively the province of black resentment. Lynching is just a kind of rough justice, which in the Jim Crow era was bound to have a racist cast. Many victims were in fact guilty of serious crimes and might have executed had the formal justice system done its work. But the mandatory cultural interpretation makes them all innocents.

* A few years ago one of the custodians at my workplace terrorized me for months. He was so obsessed with what I thought of Blacks that he could not stay away from me and he did almost zero work. He would spend all his time hanging out by my cubicle testing” my opinions on Blacks by telling me stories to see my reaction to them. He would regularly engage in freak outs because I played a blues song, or any song featuring a banjo ( I love Doc Watson) on YouTube. He would freak out over anything to do with fried chicken. One time he told me that some guy we worked with looked like Jack Black and I joked that all Whites must look alike to him. “You calling me ignorant, I ain’t ignorant, you jus’ racist!” Then he ran around the room yelling that I was racist. He tried to enlist our Chinese co-workers in a mob attack against me, but they just stared slack-jawed at him. One later told me that she found him frightening.

Another Black worker told me that “He’s just an old crackhead,” and “You don’t need to conversate with him, he ain’t right”. We were all afraid he was going to come in shooting one day and I knew that I’d be the second victim after his boss Uncle Tom.

* Microaggressions are simply an expression of paranoid schizophrenia. That doesn’t mean people can’t be thoughtless and say thoughtless things. But only a paranoid schizophrenic will take such random data and turn it into an edifice of oppression. Or to put it another way: people who complain about microaggressions are basically mentally ill.

* It’s not good to see yourself as a victim, or as a loser or to focus on your infirmities or lackings.

Of course we all fall somewhere on this spectrum, from people like this gay black shooter fella (and plenty more like him) who genuinely view themselves as perpetual victims and loathe themselves for it and suffer for it on a momentary basis (and kill for it too, which is more incidental to my comment) to people like Donald Trump who can’t remember ever having thought that he was wrong and should apologize to any of the people he destroyed (or fired) but who sees himself as a victim of some form of baldness to the point that his achilles heel is his hair, which he constantly “proves” to people that it’s “my hair”. He feels actual shame about the thing and comes across as a laughing stock when he talks about it. Other than that however he genuinely sees himself as a winner and – pretty much everyone else, relatively speaking – as a loser.

The primary reason I’ve never opened a legitimate personal injury lawsuit despite having at least two cases where I had an incontrovertible case is due to adhd type factors and other environmental ones hidden in the mists of my family’s recent history but, the CONSCIOUS reason why I never opened a legitimate case (in particular when a simple medical procedure had terrible consequences (since abated) is because I’m not interested in perpetuating the malady in my mind. And indeed, by not pursuing it further I was healed in an almost christian-sciencey manner. Had I have had to go to court however to prove the infirmity and pain (after some couple of years of the case winding its way through the system) I don’t think I’d have been healed in 2 months or perhaps not even healed for life.

That isn’t t say that Elizabeth Warren type of “playing” the victim is a bad idea (or, my favorite example, George Soros, a “holocaust survivor” who was an actual holocaust PERPETRATOR – the things he’s SAID about his activities are enough to try him for war crimes, one can only imagine what he’s done but hasn’t said). PRETENDING that you’re a victim, if it’s all just a joke to you anyway or if you’re blessed with some form of sociopathy, so that you get the goodies is an intelligent thing to do that will bring you all kinds of goodies. BELIEVING that you’re a pitiful victim leads down a road of anguish that, as with this weirdo, ends with bullet holes in bodies, including your own.

Believe that things are going well and that you’re a winner (or at least think more often about those fields where you objectively are one) and you’re likely to actually become even more of a winner (“To him that hath”) but, far more importantly, you’re likely to enjoy a life with less internal anguish, a.k.a. A better life.

* White history has been cucked.

* The insanity spewing out of the media 24/7 is starting to provoke crazy people into acting out.

* Here’s a pretty amazing study finding a very high correlation (R^2=.963) between g and performance on video games.

I guess it makes a lot of sense, if the reaction time techniques investigated by Jensen have a real basis.

* I worked under a Black man once. One day I returned to the classroom after lunch, and there he was by himself in front of the computer — literally whistling Dixie!

He was a former DL under Lovie Smith and John Cooper at Tulsa. He told me stories about his trip to play at BYU; a White kid ran the opening kickoff back for a TD because the Tulsa players were already winded at that altitude. His recounting of the story was hilarious.

We had a lot of fun hazing my co-worker — a pretty and pleasant Black girl just out of college — about her boyfriend, #29, who was still playing corner back at her Sun Belt alma mater. Then she moved on to one of the Dallas Cowboys’ starting corners, but in between she was sweet on me. Obviously, there’s no accounting for taste!

* Jews eating bagels – OK
Italians eating spaghetti – OK
Japanese eating sushi – OK
Blacks eating watermelon – Racist

Fascinating.

* I walk around Toronto a lot, and one of the things that irritates me to no end are east Asians bumping in to you or abruptly changing direction to walk in to you as if you are invisible. You have to be on your guard to swerve quickly otherwise a pedestrian collision will occur. It’s a very strange habit, I generally don’t see this in other people. I wonder why this is though, I like east Asians, but why do so many do that? I have heard many others comment on this as well, including people that have gone over to teach in China.

Posted in Blacks, Race | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Victim Wasn’t Racist So She Didn’t Deserve to be Murdered