Luke Ford | No sacred cows.

Is Israel The Only Country Where The Tide Is Moving Against Muslims?

Posted on March 6, 2016 by Luke Ford

* We have an interest in protecting Europe and Israel from Muslim takeover. Every year white Christiandom retreats a little bit more to Islam. Europe and America get a little more Muslim, and the remaining Christians are murdered and expelled from their scattered enclaves in the Middle East, the remnants of the days when white Christian Romans and Greeks ruled all of the middle east/north africa from Casablanca to Kuwait.

Israel is the only place in the entire world where the tide is moving against Muslims, where they are in a geographic, political, and demographic decline. We need to support them both as allies and as examples.

* The neocons aren’t the Jewish establishment (which is moderately left-wing), the neocons are a bunch of intellectuals who moved right when the USSR turned on Israel and are now drifting back because they see the Trumpists as sort of like the American equivalent of Polish peasants with pitchforks.

Being only a halfie I can see both sides–I get that everyone’s afraid of Weimar 1933, but that country had only a few decades of democracy and a whole third of the country that wanted to go back to monarchy. The DNVP didn’t have a rabbi opening their convention in the 1930s.

* 1. Left-wing Jews feel a need to identify with the oppressed (they are leftwingers after all), and Trump’s racism (such as it is) reminds them of old antisemitic statements. A lot of it is Ellis Island worship, more or less, as well as ‘They came for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist…’ The idea is that because of their history of persecution, they have a duty to speak up for other persecuted groups.

2. Neocons are scared s***less of white supremacists and neo-Nazis. I think the Israel issue is secondary here; everyone gets fed endless Holocaust stories (yes, I agree it happened, the point is they’re constantly reminded about it in childhood) and a lot of them see Nazis under every table.

I’d like to see Trump force the Israelis to the negotiating table; this settlement thing isn’t sustainable over the long-term. They’re overplaying their hand, and it won’t end well for them.

* I actually think Nuland is acting in her capacity as an agent of the American empire, not as a Jew. They want to weaken Russia as a rival power, so they support Ukrainian separatism.

For my part, I want to see America strong, but I don’t think extending a rival alliance to Putin’s borders is such a hot idea.

* Yeah, they’re all massively triggered – not rational at all. Even the pundits I didn’t know were Jewish are uncontrollably outing themselves in frenzy. It would be quite comical if this sort of thing didn’t have a habit of ending in tears.

* Jewish voters and congressmen strongly opposed the Iraq War, more than any other group except black congressmen.

* The people who opposed the Iraq invasion were (1) White “racists”, (2) Lew Rockwell libertarians, (3) Justin Raimondo, and (4) miscellaneous alt-righters. Remember, disagreeing with something and opposing something are not the same thing.

* Once the genie is out of the bottle the worry is what comes next? And is what comes next controllable by Jewish elites? However, the problem with this line of thinking is that the typical paranoia of Jews assumes that what comes next is gong to be anti -Semitic whereas there is no reason it has to be.

I mean Reagan was was for free markets (and people were very scared of him IIRC), but thirty years later are we living in a libertarian wet dream? No. Just because there is drift toward nationalism, to correct thirty years of not giving a fuck about the working poor and middle class (uncontrolled immigration and terrible trade deals that only benefit the 1%) who are primarily White does not mean we will have the rise of Nazism. For Crying out loud, Donald has Orthodox Jewish grandchildren!

Given the quite horrible way starting with Clinton that two parties have conspired to screw the American public for the benefit of Wall Street and the Chamber of Commerce, do they really expect that there would no reaction? Are they that insane and deluded? Trump is just a mild but energetic expression of these pressures.

Whites in particular are undergoing a “soft genocide” (TM) (i.e.,unlimited immigration, outsourcing, in sourcing, and affirmative action, and demonizing being White in the press and media) as is evidenced by the much talked about change in White longevity in the USA. Do people think Whites will do nothing in response to these pressures? So far White despair has been inner directed in suicide by drug and alcohol abuse etc…, but is inevitable that it will become outer directed if the suffering is not ameliorated. Why, because not all Whites are inner directed who tend to self-harm under these circumstances. Most are not.

De Tocqueville observed that most revolutions start when rising expectations are dashed.

I wonder that if Donald Trump is unsuccessful in ameliorating the suffering of the White lower and middle classes, and uniting people of all races, we will than get a real firebrand …someone more along the lines of a real Hitler?

I wouldn’t be surprised if this were to happen. I think that is the greater danger IMO, because it will entail a lot of suffering by everyone Whites included.

* Israel has a high birthrate and immigration rate, and it is quickly filling up the good parts of the West Bank with settlements. My problem with their policy is that it is too influenced by religion rather than plain nationalism. The perfect example of this is Hebron. It once had a large Jewish community and religious significance to them (supposedly the burial site of Abraham, Issac, and Jacob), but was ethnically cleansed by Muslims a long time ago. Right now out of a population of 200,000, about 500 are Jews. Keeping them safe requires a lot of resources and it is just stupid for them to be there. There are no important resources, and it antagonizes the Arabs to no good end.

Much better to just divide up the area into as few pieces as possible.

* I’m an unabashedly philosemitic Christian. I like and respect Jews. I like and respect Israel. All I want is a Likud-like nationalism for the U.S.

I’m like Matt Damon’s character in “The Good Shepherd.” The Catholics have their church. The Jews have their traditions. Us Protestants? We’ve got the United States of America. That’s our Pope and our Israel. Why is that so bad? We don’t want to put anybody in ovens. We kind of like people who forcefully stand up for themselves. Why aren’t we allowed to do that?

* “The non-Europeanization of America is heartening news of an almost transcendent quality.” – Ben Wattenberg. He also noted that “melting pot” Zangwill was a Zionist, which in a definition of the time was “a Jew who tries to persuade a second Jew to convince a third Jew to emigrate to Palestine”.

The members of the Lobby don’t live in Israel, so its survival as a Jewish state is not their true priority. They are primarily interested in how they can be important people in the US. Arguing for Israel to do what it needs to do in order to survive as a Jewish state, which happens to be something only President Trump might accept, would damage their personal prestige.

Wattenberg is quite representative of influential Jews, inasmuch he rehashes the greatest hit (condemning white gentiles as perpetually teetering over a slippery slope to a Fourth Reich) while ignoring or hand waving about Israel’s situation. He is patted on the head for that, as a good little boy, and gets to feel important.

* Haaretz is a left wing rag representative of virtually no one in Israel but the far left. This is like quoting the Nation as “the view from America”. It has the lowest circulation of any “major” newspaper in Israel but for some reason it is always quoted by the foreign press. The paper is Netanyahu deranged.

Most Israelis do not understand or care about US domestic politics. But Trump’s platform of a strong borders, protection of domestic industry and protection of the native demographic is the accepted norm in Israel and would be considered utterly unremarkable – except by Haaretz. (It is also why left wing US Jews are increasingly disenchanted with Israel.) Except for one thing, Trump himself would do well as a politician in Israel. That one thing is lack of military service.

Israel and the West, especially Europe, will increasingly diverge. First because the West becomes more Muslim and less nationalist while Israel becomes less Muslim and more nationalist. We will see which way America goes. Like the host, I am hoping we imitate Israel and not Europe.

* Speaking from personal experience, views about Trump in Israel are much more positive than in Britain. Trump, like it or not, fairly or not, is loathed across most of the White world. I saw a hilarious article in The Telegraph (Britain’s allegedly right wing broadsheet) about how Trump is a sexist pig because his wife says they don’t argue or something. Conversely 80%+ Israelis think he would be an improvement on Obama.

* Of course, in the long run, Trump has no chance since the Zionist powers-that-be are aligned against him. But he has stirred up something, and it might not go away for some time.

Obviously, the main issue is Jews vs Trump. Trump isn’t anti-Jewish but he is not solely Jew-centric, and this upsets Jews. Jewish Neocons think GOP exists to serve Jewish and Zionist interests first and foremost.

We hear all these Jews complaining about how Trump is all about the Authoritarian Personality and Paranoid Style in American Politics, but this is rather amusing coming from Jews, the most authoritarian (even totalitarian) and paranoid people in the world. Jews see Hitler everywhere. Every time there is someone in the world they don’t like, he is the ‘new hitler’ and US military must get ready to squash him. Or US must economically sanction and destroy that nation.

Trump’s business associates are Jewish. His daughter is married to a Jew and even converted to Jewishness and raised kid as Jew. But he is ‘hitler’ because he won’t give Jews 100% on everything. If Jews say Russia must be destroyed, it must be destroyed. The fact that Trump wants good relations with Russia makes him Hitler. This is rather amusing since Neocon Jews and Obama(tool of Liberal Zionist Jews) worked with Neo-Nazis in Ukraine to topple the government. And US’s invocation of human rights is so hollow since it is such close allies with Saudi Arabia, which still practices Medievialism, and with Israel, a nation founded on European Imperialism and ethnic cleansing of indigenous people. Afrikaners imposed separateness but didn’t throw blacks out of black lands. If anything, more blacks were attracted to white-ruled South Africa. In contrast, so-called Israel Democracy was made possible only because Jews secured majority status by expelling 800,000 people from Palestine. And West Bank is still under occupation and Israel used horrible violence to crush enemies in Gaza and Lebanon. (US imperialism cynically uses ‘democracy’ to invade and control other peoples. So, Zionist destruction of Palestinians was justified because… uh… Israel is a democracy and has ‘gay parades’. US does this all over the world. Economically or militarily destroys other nations in the name of spreading democracy and ‘western values’, which now amounts to planting homo flags and flooding the airwaves of other nations with Miley Cyrus concerts. If US wants to wreck another nation, we know how it will play out. US will say it was for ‘human rights’ and to spread ‘democracy’. Yeah, like in Iraq and Libya. And to support ‘moderate rebels’ in Syria when, in fact, they are just Alqaeda with a new name. But then, US is is the nation that once supported Osama Bin Laden as ‘freedom fighter’.)

US cooked up bogus claims against Gaddafi to crush him and destroy Libya but allows Israel to amass 300 illegal nukes and go on occupying and stealing Palestinian land. US thinks it is morally superior and has the right to push the world around because… uh.. lessee… it has ‘gay marriage’. Imagine that. So, Russia is Eeeeeeeeeevil because it doesn’t have ‘gay marriage’ and doesn’t permit homo paraders to desecrate Red Square that commemorates the sacrifice of 20 million Russians in WWII.

We know that the homo agenda is the proxy of Jewish globalist imperialism. It is funded by Wall Street, Hollywood, Las Vegas, Silicon Valley, Harvard, Yale, and etc. dominated by Jewish interests. It is to undermine national cultures and make them easier for globalist penetration. In the US, you will now be destroyed professionally if you express disdain for homosexual lifestyle. That is called ‘freedom’ and ‘tolerance’. Jews are very clever. They gain AUTHORITARIAN control over us but then call it ‘freedom’ and ‘liberty’. We live in a nation where someone cracking a joke about Bruce ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner can end up in hot water. And millennials raised by PC helicopter parents no longer value free speech. 70% of millennial freshmen want free speech suppressed if it offends certain favored groups, esp Jews, blacks, and homos. As for Russians, Iranians, Chinese, Muslims, and etc, they can still be bashed since Jews hate them. Look how Jewish Neocons are using Poles against Russia, Japanese against China, and the vile Saudis against Iran. The Saudi case shows that the Jewish-Homo campaign is a cynical ploy. If it is so important, why push it on Russia and Japan but not on Saudi Arabia? Because Saudis are close allies of the US. It comes under NO human rights scrutiny. Obama and Hillary, both shills of Jews, call Putin the ‘new hitler’ even though homosexuality is legal in Russia, but shake hands with Saudi royals who preside over a nation where homos and others can be beheaded for the slightest infraction.

Anyway, just look how Jewish Power and AIPAC pressures all US politicians to pledge to Israel. What do Mitt Romney and Bernie Sanders have in common? They both cheered the mass killing of women and children in Gaza. Even though Jews occupy Palestinian lands, we must make believe Jews are under attack by ‘nazi’ Palestinians.

Jews are only 2% of population but control so much. But Jews see no problem with that. Jews bitch about how ‘white privilege’ is unfair and that certain groups are under-represented, but that’s all just smoke-and-mirrors to hide the fact that it is Jewish privilege, not white gentile privilege, that is totally out of control. Indeed, white gentile representation in elite colleges is way below the national share of the population. But Jews hide Jewish privilege behind ‘white privilege’ and then blame white gentiles, indeed as if Wall Street, Hollywood, Silicon Valley, and etc are dominated by Southern hillbillies and Texan cowboys.

And look at the Fed. It’s been Jewish controlled for as long as I can remember. This Yellen is yet another Jew, and she got some guy named Fischer, an Israeli to boot, to work alongside her. Now, if someone noticed that there are ‘too many Jews’, Jews would scream antisemitic. But these Jews always bitch about ‘too many whites’. The Hypocritical Style of Jewish Politics is incredible. And it is Ethno-Authoritarian, predicated on the notion that the 2% should rule over the 98%. Jewish attitude toward Americans is like British attitude toward Indians during imperialism. The small minority should rule over the rest. Yet, Jews bitch about Authoritarian Personality. Talk about projection!

Neocons are a small percentage of the Republican Party, but they insist that GOP serve Zionism and Jewish centrism above all. Talk about authoritarian, or even totalitarian, personality.

Hillary is supposed to be a ‘progressive’, but she turns her nose up at Palestinians who still live under occupation because she takes money from Goldman Sachs. And so-called ‘progressive’ Jews find nothing wrong with Jews getting special favors from Hillary and other whore politicians.

But if you notice Jewish power, you end up like Rick Sanchez or Helen Thomas (whose great sin was having said that European Zionist imperialists should go back to Europe. Why is that offensive? Why Gandhi wrong when he said Brits should go home? Was Ho Chi Minh wrong when he said Americans should go home? Were the Algerians wrong when they said French imperialists should go home?) Jews bitch about authoritarian McCarthy, but McCarthy was around for just few yrs. Jewish authoritarianism that destroys careers and silences voices never goes away.

It should be obvious that Jews were never about free speech. They just invoked it to gain power. It was all about SPEECH CONTROL. When Wasps had speech control, Jews resented it because they wanted it for themselves. So, Jews invoked ‘free speech’ to weaken and undermine wasp power. But once Jews gained the power, they began to silence and destroy everyone they didn’t like.

This is classic Jewish Authoritarian Personality in action.
GOP welcomed Neocons into the party, but when Neocons took power, they purged everyone they didn’t like. They acted just like the Bolsheviks.

Yet, these Jews bitch about how OTHER people suffer from ‘authoritarian personalities’.

http://original.antiwar.com/buchanan/2012/05/28/how-bill-kristol-purged-the-arabists/

So, what Jews really wanted was not free speech for all but free speech as temporary weapon to gain power of speech control. Now that Jews got speech control, they wanna shut people down and push European-like laws where people can be fined and jailed for speaking truth to Jewish Power. Jews cleverly use terms like ‘hate speech’, but of course, they decide what is ‘hate speech’. Zionism, an ideology that called for massive ethnic cleansing, Jewish racial consciousness, Jewish nationalism, and ruthless violence against Palestinians is NOT hate speech according to Jews. But if you one notices the truth and says ‘Jews control US politicians like so many whores’, oh that is ‘antisemitic hate speech’. Very very clever.

Now, I think mindless anti-Jewishness is wrong because there are plenty of conscientious and decent Jews. But most Jewish people don’t have the power. We have to focus on Jewish Power, and it is evil, corrupt, dishonest, repressive, and exploitative. Just like there were many decent Germans in Nazi Germany but were ineffective against evil Nazi power, there seem to be many good Jews in the US but are ineffective against Jewish Elite Power that is hellbent on spreading wars all over, destroying lives who don’t celebrate homosexuality, silencing and purging all critics of Israel and Zionism, the hate ideology of Jewish supremacism against Palestinians.

The evil Powerful Jews in California and Florida are even passing laws banning BDS movement and forbidding anyone associated with it from doing business with the government. Imagine that! And there is total silence about this even in the Liberal Jewish community.

When Jewish power runs amok, it does things like this:

http://nypost.com/2001/02/15/how-marc-helped-plunder-russia/

Given what happened to Russia due to globalist Jewish conniving, you would think at least the nice conscientious Jews would try to understand the Russian position and work toward mutual understanding.

Instead, Jews push pussy riot and homo agenda on Russia as part of globalist Zionist-US imperialism, and when Russia pushes it back, Jews cry ‘authoritarianism’ and ‘repression’.

Now, are Russians trying to force Russian Orthodox ideology or Russian nationalism on Americans? NO. Russians just wanna mind their own business. it is the Jewish-controlled US that uses its military and financial and cultural power to force the homo agenda on other nations. So, Jews are the aggressive cultural aggressors but cry ‘victim’ when other nations say, “No, we don’t want this garbage.”

While tolerance for homos is a good thing, why would any nation want to celebrate homsexuality? How would Americans like it IF, say, the Chinese were into incest and tried to push ‘incest marriage’ and ‘incest pride parades’ on the US and then accused US of being ‘new nazis’ for not allowing it?

But this is what Jewish globalist imperialists do with the homo agenda. It is a new form of imperialism masked as ‘spreading human rights’.

Of course, US is a paragon of human rights because Christian bakers who won’t bake cakes for ‘gay weddings’ are fined, economically destroyed, and sent to jail.

Imagine if incest-lobby forced ‘incest marriage’ on everyone and then used government to destroy businesses that won’t cater to ‘incest marriage’.

This homo stuff isn’t about equality. It is about homo supremacism promoted by Jews to institutionalize elite minority domination, an idea favored by Jews because Jews are elite minorities in US and EU.

Of course, what I’ve just written would be called ‘hate speech’ in so-called bastions of higher education that are supposed to encourage free debate and speaking to power. There is no way to rise up in academia or media unless one kisses the ass of Jewish supremacist power. No matter how respected your reputation, if you displease Jews, you are finished and will end up destroyed and lonely like Helen Thomas. No one came to her aid when she was destroyed for speaking up for her ethnic brethren.

American moral logic goes as follow:

If a Jew says “It was great for European Jews to drive out indigenous Palestinians and grab the land and force Palestinians to live under Jewish occupation”, he or she is showered with prizes and given a seat at Harvard, Goldman Sachs, and the Fed.

If an Arab-American says, “European Jews who stole land from Palestinians should return the land and go back to Europe”, he or she is destroyed on the spot, and no one come near him or her lest they be destroyed for ‘guilty by association’.

Yet, Jews bitch about how OTHER people suffer from ‘authoritarian personality’ disorder.

Steven Salaita in NYC: ‘It’s not just Israel and Palestine that get people in trouble – it’s challenging power’

Posted in Israel | Comments Off

Nancy Reagan, RIP

Posted on March 6, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Nancy was widely derided by everyone for being a controlling astrology-following bitch, but she loved Ronnie, knew he had enemies, and did her best to protect him.

* It seems to me that Jimmy Carter—the man, though perhaps not the presidency—is slowly being rehabilitated by history, while in the case of Ronald Reagan the process is moving in the opposite direction. I cannot help but think that with the passing of Nancy Reagan, another incremental step has been taken towards the eventual “historicization” of the man and his legacy, and it will not redound to the benefit of either. Now that the old widow is not around to defend him, or to have her sensibilities offended, the critics will have a freer hand

A curious thing, is death. For as long as a person is alive his deeds are not quite set in stone, for he can still do something to atone for them or revise them or improve them, to change the overall picture of the life he bequeaths to posterity. When death comes the moment of finality has set in. It’s not that new information cannot continue to emerge about a person that might alter our perceptions of him, but that he can no longer do anything to alter his legacy. The facts are now firmly set, awaiting only to be brought to light in the land of the living. As the dead go before God to receive their judgment, the living are left to deal with their aftermath for good or ill.

Immediately after death there exists a brief span of time wherein the person seems not to have really died but only stepped away somewhere, as if separated from us by the thinnest of veils. Nancy Reagan is in that time as I write this. It is a powerful time when prayers avail much, so pray for her soul if you believe her not to be damned. If you think her beyond hope, pray for your own soul that you not share a similar fate.

* Their main failure was as parents.

Their kids. Geez.

Posted in America | Comments Off

Puerto Rico Boosts Marco Rubio

Posted on March 6, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I think that constitutes a confirmation of the sagacity of all the Jewish billionaires who have rallied around (and financed) Marco Rubio. They really do have the pulse of America. It’s no wonder they control Hollywood. They have an unerring instinct for the schlock that Americans like to buy. It also confirms that saying that Jews like to live like Episcopalians and vote like Puerto Ricans. I believe Puerto Ricans seem to share the same beliefs. They want to live like Jewish billionaires and vote for Marco Rubio.

Posted in Puerto Rico | Comments Off

There Are Good Reasons For Speaking In Code

Posted on March 6, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* “Things should be called by their proper names.”

Generally yes, but not necessarily. On an internet with ever-more sophisticated search-engines, there are good reasons for sometimes speaking in code, if you don’t want to attract the attention of hasbara trolls or government snitches.

* I imagine Trump and Adelson had a good OTR discussion about combover techniques. Adelson rocks an epic jet black combover.

* Is there a scholarly study of how the media spun birth control in the Sixties? iSteve has noted how the sexual revolution was a big win for horny guys, but more ambiguous for women (who were expected to start giving themselves away, with no commitment required). Can we trace how this happened?

* If Jews with power (media, money, etc.) were willing to support white gentiles’ ethnic interests (closed borders, repatriation of nonwhite immigrants, ending affirmative action, no world war against Russia, etc.), then it’s reasonable that we can support their pet project, too, at least to an extent. (Military aid yes, diplomatic protection against UN sanctions yes, but maybe no more wars in the ME, especially since I think they might eventually prove counter-productive to Israel as well. But who knows – after repatriations and the start of new pro-white policies, we might even consider bombing Iran or whatever.)

* I am concerned about Donald Trump’s health; he is a vigorous 69, but still 69. The schedule he has been keeping would wear out a man in his 40s. I wonder too, how has the barrage of criticism affected him? Everyone from Glenn Beck to Mitt Romney to the Pope has been attacking not only his policies but his character. To them, his character is a mix of least desirable traits of Ghenghis Khan, Caesar Borgia, Hitler and Lucifer.

I hope his wife Melania might weigh in, convince him to cut back his schedule and not to respond to every new attack. One problem with a trophy wife, however, is that she’s likely to be as dazzled as anyone–a wife that “knew you when,” might be in a better position to say “I know what’s best for you, Donald.”

* My Iowa Presbyterian church had an influential group of Christian Zionists, who believed firmy that the Jews remained God’s Chosen People (events of the First Century AD in Roman-occupied Palestine to the contrary notwithstanding) and that the United States had a religious duty to support the state of Israel. These people made Menachim Begin look like a wimp. It’s an attitude that’s impossible to refute, since there’s no scriptural basis for it, nor any Catholic, Protestant or Orthodox doctrinal basis for it. Has anyone ever examined the intellectual roots of this movement? It took me years to get over it and regard Israel as a U.S. ally, but one with its own interests and one that needs to be kept at arms-length, with relations conducted in the self-interest of the U.S.

* Trump is neglecting basics – he spends little on TV ads and does not build enough locally. Which is really stupid – all this tremendous effort at this opportune time when he really has a good chance, all of it down the drain merely because he decided to save an extra $10 million.

* Kasich is not a great guy.

In condemning Trump for not condemning David Duke forcefully enough, Kasich said “there is no place for white supremacists in America.”

Now I get that the non-Trump candidates are desperate, Kasich in particular. I get that playing dirty is sometimes part of politics. I don’t hold Kasich’s cheap trick here against him.

What bothers me goes deeper.

A) Is it even fair to refer to Duke as a “white supremacist”? Yes, the KKK could fairly he described as a white supremacist organization but he no longer is really part of them. I think Duke today can best be described as an anti-Jewish-supremacy-ist.

But enough about Duke.

Notice Kasich didn’t say there was no place for “ethnic/racial supremacists.” Just no place for white supremacists. Given the track record if Cuckservatism Inc it’s not unreasonable to assume Kasich has no beef with black supremacists or, especially, Jewish supremacists.

Finally, note how he didn’t say “white supremacy.” He said “white supremacists.” What does he want to do with them? Deport them? Imprison them? Kill them? It’s serious when a politician says there is no place in America for an entire class of people.

Kasich is not a “great guy.” He is merely on the right part of the anti-white spectrum. Make no mistake: a vote for Kasich is a vote for white genocide.

* From what I have read, a lot more East Germans are drawn to the far right because of the economic problems left by Communism (which was, after all, a universalist system with the Soviet Union at its head). Prosperity did a better job of anesthetizing the Germans, I’d say. Trump-ism didn’t get anywhere until you had lots of people with no or crummy jobs.

Also, while I agree Germans are now dealing with the problems of *too little* nationalism, *too much* wasn’t good for them either–even if you’re antisemitic Hitler did cost them large tracts of land, and the odium of the rest of Europe. It’s a tricky balance, as with most things in the social sciences. Particularly with a national character like Germany’s that tends to produce an overachieving country with an exaggerated sense of its own correctness. (Irony intended–your worst enemies are often pretty similar to you.)

Posted in America | Comments Off

Some Europeans Want To Defend Their Countries

Posted on March 6, 2016 by Luke Ford

From IBT: Polish far right groups are extending their influence across Europe through radicalised members of the country’s diaspora, a leading expert has warned.

Rafal Pankowski, professor at the Collegium Civitas and a director of the Never Again anti-racism group, said that branches of far-right groups had been set up in Polish immigrant communities throughout Europe, where they are forming alliances with native anti-immigrant groups, and engaging in racist attacks.

In an interview with IBTimes UK, he stressed of “the active role of [Polish far-right] organisations and networks in moving or leading some of those groups or some of those people into certain dangerous directions” adding “I would not underestimate the role of those groups in poisoning community relations.”

The warning comes with Polish far-right groups stepping up their activity across Europe in response to the refugee crisis. In February, fourteen far right activists in Sweden were arrested for planning to attack asylum seekers with axes, iron pipes and knives. Swedish police said some of the men were residents of Sweden, while others had travelled to the country.

Last week Polish far-right activists joined UK extremists the North-West Infidels at a rally in Liverpool, where they clashed with anti-racism demonstrators.

Warsaw is the location of one of Europe’s largest far-right rallies, with tens of thousands of extremists from throughout Europe gathering on 11 November every year to mark the country’s independence day. Last year, 50,000 attending the rally, burning EU flags and chanting anti-Islam and anti-EU slogans.

The occasion has provided an ideal opportunity for Polish extremists to build alliances across the continent.

In a recent report anti-racism group Hope not Hate identified several Polish far-right groups operating in the UK, with the Narodowe Odrodzenie Polski (National Rebirth of Poland) group among the most active. The organisation is believed to be responsible for an attack on a London music festival in 2014.

In Sweden, Polish far right groups have formed ties with members of the Nordisk Ungdom (Nordic Youth) fascist group, while in neighbouring Hungary Polish extremists have built alliances with far-right group Jobbik, which is notorious for its fiercely anti-Semitic rhetoric and for organising attacks against Roma.

“Definitely there is quite a lot of interaction and collaboration of far-right groups across borders”, said Pankowski, “which is kind of paradoxical but on a different level it makes sense because they have the same enemy: pluralist democracy and the whole idea of diversity.”

After Poland became part of the EU, millions of young Poles took advantage of the union’s freedom of movement policy to escape economic stagnation at home and find employment in prosperous northern European countries. Pankowski acknowledges the ‘paradox’ that those who are themselves immigrants should show support for such violently anti-immigrant groups.

“They don’t seem to realise they are actually attacking other migrants who may be in a similar situation apart from they have a different skin colour,” he said.

Posted in Poland | Comments Off

Why Do WNs Talk About Jews As ‘Eskimos’?

Posted on March 6, 2016 by Luke Ford

Explanation: “The root Eskimo points to 2006 Amren conference. Created into existence by, spontaneous I assume, words of Guillaume Faye.

“The water is immigration,” he continued. “We must fight on two fronts, but not by the same means. We must be very acute in our strategy. The best thing is to not speak about the Jews. They don’t exist. For me, they are like Eskimos.”

Posted in Jews | Comments Off

Celia Finkelstein: ‘I have no current plans to kill myself.’

Posted on March 6, 2016 by Luke Ford

Celia’s Twitter bio says: “I’m an actor and a writer and I have no current plans to kill myself.”

Wow. She links to her IMDB page from where I take this lovely photo.

According to her IMDB bio: “Celia Finkelstein is an actress and writer, known for Horrible Bosses (2011), Contracted (2013) and You or a Loved One (2014).”

Here are some of her tweets:

* weird how kangaroos are basically always pregnant and no one has ever really loved me the way I deserve to be loved

* it’s ? not ? my ? job ? to ? teach ? you ? about ? feminism ? pick ? up ? a ? book?

* breakups are dope because three months later you think you’re fine but then you burst into tears at the cheesecake factory in glendale

* I just want to be successful enough that I no longer live in a deep abyss of sadness and terror lol jk that doesn’t happen

* I used to date a guy who thought Frank and Claire Underwood were the healthiest couple on TV and that’s why I’m not allowed to date anymore.

* four men sexually harassed me today I have been awake for 7 hours total WHO is telling you guys that we care if you want to fuck us

* who wants to come snuggle up with me and check our privilege

* I’m white but I’m not deny-that-I’ve-benefitted-from-a-racist-system-that-harms-my-fellow-humans-therefore-denying-their-experiences white

* there are like maybe three straight white men I care to listen to and that is because they have fully embraced misandry

* guys I compared trump to hitler days ago I want a think piece about me

Posted in Feminism, Hollywood, Jews | Comments Off

Are Jews White?

Posted on March 6, 2016 by Luke Ford

Most Jews I meet look white to me. As to whether they identify as white, when it is advantageous to identify as white, such as pre-1960s America, Jews identified as white. Since victimhood became cool in the 1960s and being white became uncool, Jews have increasingly identified as non-white.

Jews respond to incentives just like everybody else. Right now, the major incentives are to identify as a victim of whites.

If America became governed by white nationalists who wanted to expel most non-whites, Jews who wanted to stay in America would quickly and loudly identify as white.

Women tend to be conformist in their thinking. Here’s an example.

Hila Hershkovitz writes:

In response to Haaretz article “Jews, white privilege and the fight against racism in America” (by Benjy Cannon 4/12/14) I would like to say loud and clear: Ashkenazi Jews are not white.

Every time I read about a Jew somewhere identifying as a white person, I cringe. As an Israeli Jew, who like most other Israeli Jews, is completely foreign to the concept of Jews being “white” I would like to address this article to my Jewish brothers and sisters in America.

Ashkenazi Jews who identify as “white”, please understand the following:

1. History and identity – As late as 1987 the US legally defined Jews as non-white. To the best of my knowledge, 50 years ago Jews had the same skin color as they do today. I deduce that white is not skin color, it is first and foremost an issue history and identity. The “white people world” is represented by its European (often colonial) history, it’s culture, heroes, it’s Kings, ethos, faith etc. – and Ashkenazi Jews are not part of that world. Their heroes are the Maccabees and not the Vikings or Joan of Arc, their Kings are David King of Israel and Hezekiah King of Judah (both archeologically confirmed historical figures) and not Kings Edward and George.

Secondly, Jews are not a “religion”. While in the Western world identities fall under the categories of religion or race, Middle Eastern people have tribal identities that are based neither the former nor the latter. Jews, similar to Pashtuns (who also often have pale skin and yet would not identify as white people) and other Middle Eastern Tribes, are neither religion nor race but a tribe. Jewish identity since the days of the Kingdoms of Judah and Israel had always been a tribal/national peoplehood. While tribal practices and customs (which are often incorrectly referred to as “Judaism”) and a strong biological link between many of the members are certainly present, Israelite identity was never based on either of these. Israelite identity has always been a tribal membership that goes by lineage (being born into the Tribes of Israel) or tribal acceptance (which is incorrectly translated as “conversion”). The identity Ashkenazi Jews have today is identical to that of King David whose great grandmother was a Moabite convert, but was nonetheless a Jew by virtue of being born into the Tribes of Israel by lineage.

You are Jews not because of your “religion” (are you even religious?), but because you were born into a tribe/people called the Nation of Israel. You are not “white people” with a “Jewish religion”, you are Jews – members of a people who origniated in Judea, whether you adhere to the laws of the tribe or not.

Thirdly, Ashkenazi Jews have been the victims of Europeans and Western imperialism for centuries precisely because they were not perceived as part of the “white people world”, beginning with the Roman colonialism of their nation state and ending with 6 million of them being killed precisely because they were non-whites.

2. Culture – Whether it’s the Hebrew calendar, the tefillin they put on at their Bar Mitzvah identical to the ancient second Temple tefillin found in Qumran and across Israel or celebrating the Judean revolt for independence in our historic homeland on Hanukkah – Ashkenazi Jews have kept the entire indigenous culture, customs, traditions, books, and to a high extant language and of their ancestors – Judeans and other Israelites.

3. Biology – Although biology is not the main part of the issue, Ashkenazi Jews are not genetically white either. An extensive number of genetic studies show they originated in the Middle East, that despite European admixture they are genetic brothers of other Jews, Palestinians, Druze and Lebanese Arabs and share a highly significant amount of ancestry with Sephardi Jews to whom they are genetically almost identical. Tests also show Ahskenazi Levites are descendants of Hebrews, and Ashkenazi Cohanim share lineage with Sephardi Cohanim.

Lastly, Ashkenazi Jews, whether the world likes it or not (and apparently it does not), are direct descendants of the Tribes of Israel, as we know from history, culture, science and a little something I like to call reality. Those who wish to deny it for political or theological reasons, should try forming an alliance with holocaust deniers because the two are no different.

Jews are not white. People who try to argue otherwise are not only abrogating history and denying our people’s authentic identity, they are in fact (even if unintentionally) also practicing a form of Western imperialism, as nobody has the right to superimpose an artificial Western identity on a people with an ancient Middle Eastern-tribal identity. Nobody has the right to try and make Jews, or any other Middle Eastern people, feel they “need” to fit into the “neat” Western categories of religion and race. Nobody has the right to force Jews into identifying as white people when they are clearly not. As for Jews who identify as white without being forced to do so – please decolonize your identities and understand that the identity your claim to express is a falsification of who you really are.

Posted in Jews, Whites | Comments Off

The Bible Is Red Pill (Reality)

Posted on March 6, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comment: Judaism is all about survival and perpetuation of the in-group, exclusion of out-groups. Everything about it. Think of it as an extremely effective, self-perpetuating social machine.

I got thoroughly red pilled several years ago. Then I read the Bible straight through.

I was struck by the Old Testament. Some of my takeaways (your mileage may vary):

– Religion is a powerful force for social structure and order. It grants special privileges to those at the top (e.g. the Levites) who then have a vested interest in its perpetuation.

– All the rules about what you can wear, what you can eat, how much to sacrifice to G-d, blah blah in the Book of Deuteronomy boil down to one game concept — Compliance. Getting people to follow small, meaningless rules conditions them to accept authority and follow larger rules. My conclusion was that rules in all religions, not just Judaism, are about reinforcing compliance.

– Rules banning adultery, homosexuality etc on religious grounds are about reinforcing social order. Things break down and men fight if wives fuck around or men don’t reproduce.

– Judaism is built upon the fact that they are above all other peoples. They are “chosen” by G-d. This is a bedrock belief. It explains why when they arrived in Canaan from the desert they felt entitled to kill EVERYONE there. Those people were subhuman and unworthy. G-d is one their side. He has destined them to rule over all other peoples.

– The “Jews are chosen and others are subhuman” theme pops up frequently. There’s a whole book in the Old Testament on rule for business dealings. It states clearly that a Jew should always pay a debt to another Jew, but does not really have to pay a debt to an outgroup member. This is moral and just.

– Judaism has an incredibly effective immune system that identifies and eliminates threats so it can perpetuate itself. If a family member begins to follow other gods, it is G-d testing your faith. It’s your duty to kill him.

At the time there were lots of religions and gods in the region. It put Judaism into crisis after crisis as Jews wandered off to other faiths. For Judaism to survive it had to evolve strong mechanisms for rejecting and excising invading beliefs. The story of the revered prophet Elijah is a big example. He singlehandedly led a movement to expel foreign faiths and rejuvenate Judaism.

– The in-group/out-group dynamic has always relied heavily on emphasising external threats. Hence, the need for Jews always to feel under siege in order to maintain in-group unity and cohesion. If Jews don’t have a big threat they manufacture one.

I really enjoyed reading the Bible. Oddly, many “religious” people I speak to about the Bible have never actually read it. They’ve just read a passage here or a passage there, with the “meaning” spoon fed to them by a clergy member.

If you have a good red pill grounding and you want to understand the role of religion and the tenets of Judaism, you might consider reading the Bible. I found the New International Version to be the most readable.

* All religions preach a level of superiority and special benefits of some sort to the followers.

Maimonides preaches tolerance to outgroups, but there, is of course, some level of superiority/inferiority. Judaism is really a reaction to contempory Poz pagan cults (nature cults, decadent cults (bhaal), collectivist cults (egypt)multi-culturalism (tower of babel), Sadism cults) etc..

There is an idea that Israel is G-ds gift to the Jews.

Frankly, the ingroup loyalty of Jews is something that WN laughably overstate. Most secular Jews are hopelessly jealous of each other. The “Transparent” show shows the collapse of the Jewish family. Jewish loyalty among American Jews is DOA.

If a Jew ever appeals to your mutual sense of Jewish identity it often means that he plans on ripping you off (unless he’s a hard boiled Zionist or enthusiastic Orthodox). Irish have a greater sense of in-group loyalty.

Posted in Jews, Judaism | Comments Off

Anti-Gentilism Or Pro-Globalism?

Posted on March 6, 2016 by Luke Ford

From the Chateau:

Does anti-Gentilism or pro-Globalism primarily motivate diaspora Jewish Leftism? Submitted for your consideration, two insightful comments, the first arguing for the former explanation and the second for the latter explanation.

Arguing the anti-Gentilism case, reader Name Redacted writes from his personal experience,

Having been raised a Catholic who married into a Jewish family and lived among the Tribe for a decade or so, I think I am uniquely qualified to address this issue.
Jews in the U.S. support left-wing causes not for the causes themselves, but because they see those causes as a way to stick it to the Christian majority. I don’t think most of them do this consciously. But a lot of them equate “white America” with “oppression” and “conformity” and believe the patriarchal white majority is something that needs to be usurped.
This explains why Jews were the architects of feminism and the backers of the ’60s Civil Rights Movement. What better way to screw up Christian families and majority-Christian neighborhoods? This also explains a lot [about] 20th century art. Jews don’t create to entertain so much as “break boundaries” — boundaries which, of course, were put there by Christian morality.
This also explains why different rules apply when it comes to Jews and Israel vs. Jews and America. “Open borders for thee, but not for me!”
This way of thinking is so ingrained in Jewish families, I’m not sure they’re even conscious of it. But once you start realizing this is what they’re up to, a lot of things take on a more sinister tone, such as their obsession with calling out so-called Christian hypocrisy.
This includes everything from Paul Simon’s snide “Jesus loves you” lines in “Mrs. Robinson” to Billy Joel’s anti-Catholic “Only the Good Die Young” to the trashy “Two and a Half Men” airing in prime time to countless Hollywood films that trash Middle American values. I’d give examples of the last of these, but generally avoid mainstream movies. [ed: “American Beauty” is a subversively vile representative of the genre.]
Then there are the scads of Jewish “sexperts,” and the people of the porn industry, all of whom want to “liberate” your daughters from the “oppression” of the very Christian values that made this country work to begin with.
Put it all together, and basically it comes down to “how can we destroy the Christians of America?”. Christians — or people who just think Christianity is what helped make America — should think about this before consuming any Jewish art — from books to CDs to movies to porn. You’re essentially paying for the demise of society by buying it — or buying into it.

One thing I’ve seen a lot more of recently is open Jewish-American hostility to “nativists”. I can only guess that a lengthy time in power has fractured the filters that used to massage this kind of anti-White rhetoric into something more palatable to a wide audience.

***

Arguing for the more benign, less overtly antagonistic pro-Globalism (aka pro-Rootless Cosmopolitanism, pro-“one happy family”) explanation is a reader who wishes to remain anonymous.

Really interesting posts re: Jews and Leftism. Lots to think about, and I think you’re on target or close in several areas. There are a couple more things worth thinking about, because they either pertain to the alt-Right or serve as food for thought.
—-
SHAITAN’S LURE
I think The Man Who Was isn’t entirely wrong, but the answer to the “why” here goes into history and psych in other ways. It has a lot to do with a Jewish split in the modern era, where a significant chunk of Jews became very attracted to the 2 great poles of modernity: Britain/ the USA, and Marxism/Soviet Union. Both, in their own ways, promised them the same thing:
“You can be one of us/ ‘normal’ here.”
Obviously, the ironies abound in both cases. But that was the lure, and it was a doozy.
It’s a whole book to explain how that spun out, and I don’t think it has been done. But the route through The Cathedral becomes pretty obvious when those are your 2 magnetic poles. And in psych terms, if that promise meant a LOT to you, but you were always worried about it turning out to be a mirage… what might one predict as traits, allegiances, and then the follow-on effects of traits and allegiances compounding? [ed: a genetic, innate neuroticism would exacerbate any worries about “fitting in”, possibly driving those worries to a pathological (self-harming) degree of expression.]
In Israel, you will still hear an echoing longing to be a ‘normal’ country among the Left. You can likewise imagine where this leads in r/K terms.
The irony that the actions produced by one’s fears and perceived lacks will end up conjuring the very things one fears in the end (hellooo every beta!)… well, humans are smart but that rarely means rational.
I’ll finish with a triggering thought: the alt-Right’s relationship to The Cathedral has a ton of things in common with the Jewish situation during the Middle Ages.
Which means a dispassionate analysis of Jewish history, options, and decisions (good/ stupid/ otherwise) would actually be very productive for its thinkers. Yeah, I know, the Jamaican bobsled team is more likely to win Olympic Gold. Still…
DEMOGRAPHIC REPLACEMENT – OF THE JEWISH “MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE”
The real answer to Ponce’s “who are the seculars” question is:
Maybe you know some Christians that only go to Church once a year, if that, and who would have 50/50 odds that they could correctly recite a prayer if their life depended on it? It’s a lot like that.
There are Consequences.
Unsurprisingly, Jewish intermarriage outside the religion within the American secular/”Reform” community approaches 70%. Yes, there’s much hand-wringing. But objectively, why not 70%? Jews who don’t really believe in Judaism marry Christians who don’t really believe in Christianity. The Cathedral is their real mutual religion, and religion it is. Few stay Jewish. If they do, they’re in the Cathedralized sectors of Judaism (esp. “Reform”).
Note that for Reform/secular Jews in America, I think fertility is about 1.8. That, plus intermarriage, is Chekov’s Gun.
Intermarriage is much lower among the Orthodox, and families north of 5 kids are common and expected. Indeed, there are special community institutions designed to make this affordable – which the alt-Right should research to copy. Low intermarriage. Early marriage (indeed, some are still arranged marriages), and the requirement of a religious divorce alongside the civil (you can’t remarry within the Orthodox without a “Get”), tends to lock both men and women down. Women marry early and have kid after kid during their fertile period. They exit the other end well past The Wall. Men are faced with 5+ kids at 40, imagine the child support costs.
It takes about 3 generations for a 90/10 population ratio with these kinds of contrasts to make the 10% a majority – and the leap to majority status isn’t linear. Within the American Jewish community, that 3rd generation is just being born.
Demography is destiny.
DO WE NEED A HEBREW WORD FOR ‘SHITLORD’?
Israel may be different, but only because the Orthodox there are shifting the whole population to be more religious and have more kids of their own. Israel is moving in the opposite direction to most Western countries, and you’d expect that result when a culturally cohesive group with a program like that can be a much bigger slice of the national culture (still only 15-18% – THIS generation).
It’s fascinating to watch.
Liberal Jews are openly nervous, in an era when those Jews who have bowed down to Leftism must pledge hostility to Jewish expression as part of the bargain. Secular/Reform Jews would often rather dialogue with Muslim terrorists than the Orthodox. Which of course. Rabbits gonna rabbit.
You may start to notice unflattering portrayals of Jewish Orthodox, starting recently with kerfuffles about them not wanting to sit next to women on airlines. I expect that to ramp up. And guess who is super-visible and will be targeted first by the Mideast Die-versity mainstream Judaism has shepherded in?
I know you aren’t exactly friendly to Jews. [ed: this is not true in practice. only in the abstract, where ideas about the national question get tossed around] And I get why. Many have betrayed the only non-Jewish civilization that offered them any real hope. That they betrayed their G-d and religion first doesn’t soften the blow much.
All I’ll say is, imagine a group who takes religion seriously, has a tested program that controls hypergamy, has a raw grudge to nurse with Leftism, and believes in various shadings of separation in place. Imagine that such a group becomes the default concept of “Jew” within 20 years.
It’s easy if you try.
Now, the allegiances of that group – and their situation – those are big TBDs. I really wonder if Neoreaction’s Plan (per free Northerner) might work well with this set, when the time comes. And there might be some clever ways to plant that seed now, while strengthening the alt-Right’s program.

Well, let’s face it — a secular Jew will be a lot more fun at a party than an Orthodox Jew. But, to depart from my poolside location for a moment, a nation is more than the sum of its parties.

Here’s a question I have for any geneticists lurking: Are Orthodox and Secular/Reform Jews from different gene pools? That is, do the Orthodox in America (and Israel) hail from different regions than the regions secular Jews left behind for America (and Israel)? I suspect that the differences between the two groups go deeper than religious/cultural preferences.

This gets to my contention that more than cultural experience is at work in the Jewish predilection for open borders leftism and their knee-jerk hatred for even the most innocuous expressions of nationalist populism (e.g., keeping out rapefugees, building a wall). If, as I have theorized, secular American Jews have inherited and brought with them to their new lands a suite of personality traits — the Tikkun Olam Triad — that predisposes them to radical anti-Gentilism and/or pro-Globalism, then this would partly explain the noted observation that Israeli Orthodox Jews aren’t nearly as Left Wing as their secular Jewish-American cousins.

Because, in fact, they may be more like third cousins than brothers.

Anyhow, at the end of the day American Jews (and as the disproportionately influential gatekeepers of the media megaphone, it’s right to address them separately from the garden variety shitlib Gentile) are going to have to come to terms with the reality that opening America’s borders to the world’s wretched refuse (and vehemently chiding those who fight back against their demographic dispossession) will, inevitably, make America more wretched and full of refuse: a much less livable, lovable place that no one, not even rootless cosmopolitans, will want to call home.

You can read this post as a sincere appeal to common sense. To noblesse oblige instead of noblesse malice. Let’s hope there’s enough of that magnanimity left in those still nursing age-old resentments at having to work to fit in.

COMMENTS:

* An example similar to “American Beauty” is the film version of “The Graduate.” Interestingly, the movie is about the pain of being Jewish in a WASP society, but this message was included because of the director’s subconscious bias. It didn’t even make sense in the context of the movie because Hoffman’s character (the Jew outsider) is supposed to be the son of a WASP couple. This ridiculous oversight by the director was apparently parodied in a humor magazine shortly after the movie came out.

* Steve Sailer writes: Nichols likes to claim that he hadn’t realized what The Graduate was actually about until he saw it parodied in a juvenile humor magazine in October 1968:

It took me years before I got what I had been doing all along — that I had been turning Benjamin into a Jew. I didn’t get it until I saw this hilarious issue of MAD magazine after the movie came out, in which the caricature of Dustin says to the caricature of Elizabeth Wilson, ‘Mom, how come I’m Jewish and you and Dad aren’t?’ And I asked myself the same question, and the answer was fairly embarrassing and fairly obvious: Who was the Jew among the goyim? And who was forever a visitor in a strange land?

This may be a story that has gotten better in Nichols’s retelling because the ethnic angle had not been so mysterious to Nichols’s underlings. J. W. Whitehead’s book Appraising The Graduate includes Hoffman’s memory of protesting to his self-confident director the implausibility of his casting:

“I’m not right for this part, sir. This is a Gentile. This is a WASP. This is Robert Redford.” …
Nichols replied, “You mean he’s not Jewish?”
“Yes, this guy is a super-WASP. Boston Brahmin.”
And Mike said, “Maybe he’s Jewish inside.”

During filming, Hoffman picked up his first groupie: ‘‘Beautiful, thin, a real shiksa goddess. I think Nichols took that as a sign — at least somebody found me attractive. And it didn’t get past me, either!’‘

Screenwriter Buck Henry argued for Hoffman’s plausibility in the role by appealing to Cesare Lombroso‘s 1870s theory of racial atavism:

“You know my theory about California genetics? Jews from New York came to the Land of Plenty, and within one generation the Malibu sand had gotten into their genes and turned them into tall, Nordic powerhouses. Walking surfboards. We were thinking about how these Nordic people have Dustin as a son, and it’s got to be a genetic throwback to some previous generation.”

At whatever point Nichols got the idea, he ran with it:

“He couldn’t be a blond, blue-eyed person, because then why is he having trouble in the country of the blond, blue-eyed people? It took me a long time to figure that out—it’s not in the material at all. And once I figured that out, and found Dustin, it began to form itself around that idea.”

Whitehead says, “Nichols wanted Hoffman to project an estrangement that began in the blood.”

In 1938 Nichols had arrived in America from Berlin, where his anti-communist Jewish ancestors had found refuge from the Soviet Union. His father quickly became successful again in the US. And the son became even more so, first triumphing at stand-up comedy with Elaine May, then directing Neil Simon blockbusters on Broadway. His first movie, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, earned him an Oscar nomination. He’s since completed the coveted EGOT career grand slam, winning four Emmys, one Grammy, one Oscar (for The Graduate), and nine Tonys.

But everybody feels a bit estranged and unappreciated, even if (or especially if) he is Mike Nichols.

Ultimately, The Graduate is about the pain of being Jewish in a gentile society. This theme had been downplayed by previous generations of Jewish filmmakers, who were grateful for how nice Americans had been to Jews. But as the years went by, Jewish-American artists discovered that there was little danger and much profit in violating this old norm.

Not surprisingly, Nichols’s ethnic alienation is reflected throughout The Graduate. In the wake of Israel’s smashing June 1967 triumph in the Six Day War, this proved tremendously popular with the American public at large.

For example, in the first scene in the hotel lobby, the unaggressive Benjamin has to step aside while dozens of pushy WASPs in formal attire shove through a revolving door ahead of him. And, of course, there’s the memorable last scene in which Benjamin rescues his shiksa goddess from her new husband at the Methodist church by swinging a giant crucifix at the resentful blond beasts.

It doesn’t get much more obvious than that.

* One rumour that I heard, possibly via the film critic Mark Kermode, was that even though the character is a tall, good-looking, all-American boy Dustin Hoffman was cast in the role because of the character’s insecurities. Essentially, deep down the character looked tall and confident but felt small and Jewish, ie neurotic. Dustin Hoffman was portraying how the character felt.

* All that blather aside about “how the character felt”, the big tell of the movie’s intention was the final church scene. They love to desecrate churches and crosses (little yid even uses the latter as a weapon and then to bar the doors). And check out the truly Aryan groom and his parents, their distorted faces of hate get REAL close up shots as Hoffman is banging on the glass to disrupt the service.

And oh, that grand finale! Beautiful shicksa bride screams out her love’s name and runs to him, abandoning would-be husband, family, friends, and indeed, church.

A yid nerd’s wet dream… touted to the skies then, and even to this day as an “important, ground-breaking film.”

* Well, plastics IS the future, you know… I, too, loathe the endless blasphemy/desecration/mockery of all things Christian that hwood loves to throw at the public. I want more people to open their eyes to see it for what it is. But, like you said before, people will say, since there was only one scene that showed someone shitting in the Holy water, it’s not an anti-Christian movie. Morons all.

* American Beauty can be summed up in a George Orwell-esque way:

“Normal bad, disordered good!”

* Mike Nichols thought he was making a movie about “The Generation Gap” but was actually just about how WASPs, conformity, privilege, and rules suck.

* I don’t feel this applies so much to British Jews. Three points spring to mind.

1) Michael Howard – Leader of the Conservative Party in the 2005 ran a campaign that mentioned cutting immigration (despite being descended from a central European Jewish family – original name: Hecht). He got attacked from non-Jews for being uncaring. Anti-immigration sentiment was NOT thick on the ground back them.

2) After riots in the early 1980s, the Church of England produced a report itled ‘Faith in the City’ which Thatcher cricicised as containing “nothing about self-help or doing anything for yourself”. By contrast, Britain’s chief Rabbi, produced a rebuttal called From Doom to Hope: A Jewish view of “Faith in the City”, which argued that the Jewish contribution to eradicating poverty “would lay greater emphasis on building up self-respect by encouraging ambition and enterprise through a more demanding and more satisfying work-ethic, which is designed to eliminate human idleness and to nurture pride in “eating the toil of one’s hands” as the first immediate targets” and that “blacks should not look to the state but instead to themselves and take responsibility for their poverty and should learn from the Jewish experience of working themselves out of poverty, educating themselves and building up a “trust in and respect for the police, realising that our security as a minority depended on law and order being maintained”.

3) Keith Joseph – Another Conservative Party politican who was the intellectual force behind Margaret Thatcher. Could perhaps have become party leader were it not for a 1974 speech in which he gave so much RealTalk that outraged everyone at the time despite being spot-on. I’m going to give you the key line that should be carved on Britain’s gravestone.

“A high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers least fitted to bring children into the world…. Some are of low intelligence, most of low educational attainment. They are unlikely to be able to give children the stable emotional background, the consistent combination of love and firmness…. They are producing problem children…. The balance of our human stock, is threatened…”

I am not Jewish but I am British. I can honestly say that in Britain you get more Marxist pseudo-intellectual drivel from the Church of England than from Jews. It seems to be different here (and no, I haven’t forgotten or forgiven the Mandelson and the dreadful Millibands).

* It’s not even about the Holocaust. They’ve been outsiders in the societies of other people for 2000 years. Them siding with outsiders in any society they might be in is just an evolved reflex, genetic or cultural.

* Jews have an epic right tail in 4-8 SDs. As evidence, Nobel Prizes, Fields Medal, etc. are won by non-Orthodox Jews x120-x300 times their global population. Jews have won 22% of ALL Nobel Prizes. I can’t imagine stronger evidence.

You complain that there was no “Jewish Goethe,” but, as you know, this was impossible. Jews were emancipated in 1820. Prior to that they were not writing. Spinoza was published posthumously and was excommunicated for his writings. You are a little hard on Maimonodes, who strikes me as ShitLord, but I am no expert.

It is also worth noting that Christianity has a sublime aesthetic sense and appreciation of beauty. Judaism does not. Christians are inspired by their religion to produce tremendous works of art (or even rejection of Christianity). There were staggering passions at work. Christian culture (1500-1900) will simply outweigh anything any other culture could make, ever.

There were some nice non-Poz Jewish contributions: Heifetz, Mendelssohn, Mahler, and Irving Berlin. I can’t think of any non-Poz writer off hand other than Boris Pasternak.

* Everyone here should watch the Amazon series Transparent. Sure, the transsexual storyline hogs all the media attention. But the bigger theme is the nastiness and misery of a modern secular Jewish family. I’ve never seen a more despicable family portrayed in a drama (when the family is the protagonist).

I wish someone would compile a list of disparaging comments made by Jews, especially Jewish women, about Gentile women. I think this shiksa hatred is a primitive reaction against their sexual competitors and the vitriol exceeds your typical female catfight. Jewish female journalists and politicians were insanely spiteful towards Sarah Palin. Stupid people like Palin can usually be ignored, but Sarah was resented mostly for her attractiveness.

* I think the shortcut to this would be to cull the routines of Amy Schumer and Sarah Silverman.

* Jews are Semites. To paraphrase the future Pope in The Godfather, Part III, for centuries they have been surrounded by Christ (and even interpenetrated with White blood), but it does not live in them. In their instincts, aptitudes, and attitudes, they are creatures of the Desert, akin to the Arabs, the Persians, even the Brahmins of India. Razib Khan and the Jews belong together in the same (pricklish, snotty, fugly) continuum: neither of them in a White one.

Spiritually, they belong in that world, not in the West. Perhaps, in time, they could learn to be happy in it. Perhaps the best destiny for Israel is to accept becoming some sort of Singapore for the Middle Eastern world, a vaguely more equitable (if they can manage it) version of Qatar. Their evident hard-on for Islam betrays this. Whatever individual Jews may– even passionately– believe, MOST of them belong spiritually in an entirely other civilizational context than the White one.

* When I worked for a heavily Jewish tech company in the late nineties I (still blue pill at the time) was struck how freely and openly Jews would denigrate Whites and Christianity in front of and directly to Whites and nominal Christians like me. Naturally enough even a mere hint of something similar towards the Chosenites would set off anti-semitic alarm bells, resulting in severe retribution for the offender.

* Secular Jews are often hard right tail IQ neurotic/narcissistic. The perfect analogue is Tony Blair. Super-IQ Irish Catholic narcissist who backstabbed England with 3 million Muslims out of some narcissistic injury handed to him? Obama has a similar insanely sadistic trait from untold narcissistic injuries (black, no dad, gay teen). Merkel? So, they aren’t Jewish, but they are *Acting Jewish* in their sadistic rage at the Christian male establishment.

Some Jews are WASP assimilated. William Shatner or David Frum are nice examples. Note the conspicuous lack of sadistic “edge” in their personalities. Contrast with Podhorertz who just called me a “jew poseur” because I reminded him that Jews would take the blame if Trump were usurped.

Orthodox Jews are more agreeable people, which is why they chose Orthodoxy and remain loyal to the faith of their ancestors. Israelis heroically risk their lives out of a romantic obligation to the Holy Land. It is self selecting. Jewish dentists are rarely secret agents of the Poz. Jews who choose “literature” or arts are almost always obsessed with promoting the Poz (except John Milius, who was notably a failed soldier).

The dark hard truth: Countries need to be ruled by “in group” hereditary landed elites (oddly, like Trump). That’s how the West ran itself for 2500 years. When you hand power to a Narcissist through Democracy who is “Outgroup” (woman, Jew, Kenyan, Irish, polio victim), they will use their power to vent their sadism to absolve prior narcissistic injuries unless Stone Cold Reactionary (Disraeli, Thatcher).

* I had an interesting exchange with a young Jewish man at a hipster-geek bar in South America who seemed to be rather depressed. An analysis of his mind gives a case study for the “anti-gentilism” side and suggests it may be universal.

He was born in Argentina, but spent some years in the USA and moved back. I went the opposite direction, and he spoke good English, so we had a chat. He said his country is a shit-hole and the women suck.

I asked him why, and he said it was because everybody here is Christian Italian and they all like futbol (soccer). Nerds like him get marginalized, and he resents that because apparently, things that bring people together (like sports and heritage) are just another form of nationalism – which of course he immediately declared the same as Nazi Germany and Hitler.

Normally, a person like this is just a bitter nerd, but the Nazi thing was quite a stretch so I had to throw in some Jew-bait. He seemed like a real philosophical type so I figured he may just surprise me.

* “Israel is moving in the opposite direction to most Western countries”

Liberalism and feminism are preached for western consumption mostly.
Many times i said that Israel, in some ways, looks like the US from the 50s
I will post this again.

In Israel, the only institutionalized form of Jewish marriage is the religious one, a marriage conducted under the auspices of the mostly male rabbinate.

There is very low divorce rate in Israel – 28 % compared to more than 50% in the US and Europe. Probably because in Israel, a jewish woman can not divorse without her husband’s permission.

There is very high birth rate – 3 kids per jewish woman. In Europe, the birth rate for white women is 1,5, in the US – 1,7
The population replacement rate is 2.1

Religion is flourishing in Israel. There are many gender segregated places, and even jewish women who wear burkas like muslims.

There is very high marriage rate in Israel, and very low levels of cohabitation without marriage. Only 3 percent of kids are born to mothers who are not married, compared to 40-50 percent in the West. Only 13 percent of families are led by single parent, compared to 31 percent in the US.

Why is marriage important? Umarried women tend to vote to the left, married women – to the right. In the US, 70 percent of unmarried women voted for Obama, while the majority of married women voted against Obama. Therefore a society with high marriage rate will tend to be more right wing.

A woman without a man in Israel is seen as something to be remedied; a woman without children – an aberration to be pitied.

Parents are highly involved in mate selection for their daughters, which sometimes results in arranged marriages.

A wife must receive permission (called Get) from her husband in order to divorce him, even if he is at fault. A husband can secure a divorce whether or not his wife consents.

The rabbinical court than manages marriage and divorce is all male.

A child born to a married woman from another man is labeled as a bastard (mamzer, which could mean a “bastard”, or a “son of a prostitute”) , and is not eligible to marry another Jew.

A married woman who had a sexual relationship with another man is not allowed to marry the latter once her marriage is dissolved; a Cohen (a man belonging to the priestly caste) may not marry a divorced woman; a woman who has been separated from her husband for reasons beyond her control, such as war or disappearance – may not remarry at all. Moreover, women whose husbands refuse to divorce them are also banned from remarriage.

Same-sex couples are also excluded from marriage. Interfaith marriages are not recognized either, since Judaism, Islam, and other religions impose restrictions on marriage between people of different religions, and in many cases even regard this kind of marriage as void.

The gender income gap in Israel is large – women earn 65 percent of what men earn. The gender income gap in Israel is way bigger than the one in the US and EU.

Abortion is illegal for married women in Israel.

Jews in Israel are not allowed to marry non-jews.

There are vigilante groups looking to prevent jewish women from dating arabs.

According to Avigail Moor, a psychologist who treats victims of sexual violence and a researcher at the Tel Hai college in northern Israel, more than 60 percent of Israeli men and 40 percent of women do not believe that forcing sex on an acquaintance constitutes rape. As for sex without consent in a relationship, 18.5 percent of israeli women and only 17.3 percent of men thought that was rape.

As Peter Beinart wrote in his New York Review of Books essay: “For several decades, the Jewish establishment has asked American Jews to check their liberalism at Zionism’s door.”

* Jewish leftism is anti-God-ism. Jewish atheists hate God for the Holocaust and other hardships they’ve seen, and they take it out on their fellow man.

Orthodox and Messianic Jews are conservative. Jews who respect YHWH are conservative.

* WASP’s are the biggest enablers of Jew power in the modern world. UK and US are filled with idiotic self-hating people that kiss Jew ass every time they can, and continuously parrot the absurd pseudo-intellectual nonsense peddled by Jews on economics, education, feminism, race, religious belief, etc, etc. Latins and Slavs are much less prone to eat up their nonsense, and hence why you don’t see Jews having power to the same extend in the nations where these people are the majority, like one sees them having in the UK and US. Unfortunately, for the western world, because of the influence that the UK and US have on it, Jewish rubbish is amplified and extends to other nations as well, and therefore the degeneracy continuously spreads, like a virus.

* Leftist Jews are secular/reform Jews. When they came to the West, they had two options: to remain in a secluded community or to integrate. Since they were secular, they wanted to integrate. They could integrate by adopting Christianity, but this was the enemy of their forefathers, a kind of ancient taboo.

Or they could integrate by adopting the religion of the Left, which filled the religious void they had in their minds, integrated them to the West and wasn’t a taboo or a historical enemy. In addition, it was the religion of brainy people, such as them. They did that although retaining their ethnicity. Since the religion of the Left, it is anti-Christian and anti-White, they are anti-Christian and anti-White. They have a plus because they are Jews so they remember grievances against Christians.

In short, the Jews that are producing these mayhem are not Orthodox Jews but converts. Converts to the religion of the Left. Their Judaism is vestigial and disappearing, when they intermarry (think Woody Allen’s kids) or have a low birthrate. This is why Orthodox Jews will be the majority of the American Jews in some few decades.

Posted in Hollywood, Jews | Comments Off