Does anti-Gentilism or pro-Globalism primarily motivate diaspora Jewish Leftism? Submitted for your consideration, two insightful comments, the first arguing for the former explanation and the second for the latter explanation.
Arguing the anti-Gentilism case, reader Name Redacted writes from his personal experience,
Having been raised a Catholic who married into a Jewish family and lived among the Tribe for a decade or so, I think I am uniquely qualified to address this issue.
Jews in the U.S. support left-wing causes not for the causes themselves, but because they see those causes as a way to stick it to the Christian majority. I don’t think most of them do this consciously. But a lot of them equate “white America” with “oppression” and “conformity” and believe the patriarchal white majority is something that needs to be usurped.
This explains why Jews were the architects of feminism and the backers of the ’60s Civil Rights Movement. What better way to screw up Christian families and majority-Christian neighborhoods? This also explains a lot [about] 20th century art. Jews don’t create to entertain so much as “break boundaries” — boundaries which, of course, were put there by Christian morality.
This also explains why different rules apply when it comes to Jews and Israel vs. Jews and America. “Open borders for thee, but not for me!”
This way of thinking is so ingrained in Jewish families, I’m not sure they’re even conscious of it. But once you start realizing this is what they’re up to, a lot of things take on a more sinister tone, such as their obsession with calling out so-called Christian hypocrisy.
This includes everything from Paul Simon’s snide “Jesus loves you” lines in “Mrs. Robinson” to Billy Joel’s anti-Catholic “Only the Good Die Young” to the trashy “Two and a Half Men” airing in prime time to countless Hollywood films that trash Middle American values. I’d give examples of the last of these, but generally avoid mainstream movies. [ed: “American Beauty” is a subversively vile representative of the genre.]
Then there are the scads of Jewish “sexperts,” and the people of the porn industry, all of whom want to “liberate” your daughters from the “oppression” of the very Christian values that made this country work to begin with.
Put it all together, and basically it comes down to “how can we destroy the Christians of America?”. Christians — or people who just think Christianity is what helped make America — should think about this before consuming any Jewish art — from books to CDs to movies to porn. You’re essentially paying for the demise of society by buying it — or buying into it.
One thing I’ve seen a lot more of recently is open Jewish-American hostility to “nativists”. I can only guess that a lengthy time in power has fractured the filters that used to massage this kind of anti-White rhetoric into something more palatable to a wide audience.
***
Arguing for the more benign, less overtly antagonistic pro-Globalism (aka pro-Rootless Cosmopolitanism, pro-“one happy family”) explanation is a reader who wishes to remain anonymous.
Really interesting posts re: Jews and Leftism. Lots to think about, and I think you’re on target or close in several areas. There are a couple more things worth thinking about, because they either pertain to the alt-Right or serve as food for thought.
—-SHAITAN’S LURE
I think The Man Who Was isn’t entirely wrong, but the answer to the “why” here goes into history and psych in other ways. It has a lot to do with a Jewish split in the modern era, where a significant chunk of Jews became very attracted to the 2 great poles of modernity: Britain/ the USA, and Marxism/Soviet Union. Both, in their own ways, promised them the same thing:
“You can be one of us/ ‘normal’ here.”
Obviously, the ironies abound in both cases. But that was the lure, and it was a doozy.
It’s a whole book to explain how that spun out, and I don’t think it has been done. But the route through The Cathedral becomes pretty obvious when those are your 2 magnetic poles. And in psych terms, if that promise meant a LOT to you, but you were always worried about it turning out to be a mirage… what might one predict as traits, allegiances, and then the follow-on effects of traits and allegiances compounding? [ed: a genetic, innate neuroticism would exacerbate any worries about “fitting in”, possibly driving those worries to a pathological (self-harming) degree of expression.]
In Israel, you will still hear an echoing longing to be a ‘normal’ country among the Left. You can likewise imagine where this leads in r/K terms.
The irony that the actions produced by one’s fears and perceived lacks will end up conjuring the very things one fears in the end (hellooo every beta!)… well, humans are smart but that rarely means rational.
I’ll finish with a triggering thought: the alt-Right’s relationship to The Cathedral has a ton of things in common with the Jewish situation during the Middle Ages.
Which means a dispassionate analysis of Jewish history, options, and decisions (good/ stupid/ otherwise) would actually be very productive for its thinkers. Yeah, I know, the Jamaican bobsled team is more likely to win Olympic Gold. Still…
DEMOGRAPHIC REPLACEMENT – OF THE JEWISH “MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE”
The real answer to Ponce’s “who are the seculars” question is:
Maybe you know some Christians that only go to Church once a year, if that, and who would have 50/50 odds that they could correctly recite a prayer if their life depended on it? It’s a lot like that.
There are Consequences.
Unsurprisingly, Jewish intermarriage outside the religion within the American secular/”Reform” community approaches 70%. Yes, there’s much hand-wringing. But objectively, why not 70%? Jews who don’t really believe in Judaism marry Christians who don’t really believe in Christianity. The Cathedral is their real mutual religion, and religion it is. Few stay Jewish. If they do, they’re in the Cathedralized sectors of Judaism (esp. “Reform”).
Note that for Reform/secular Jews in America, I think fertility is about 1.8. That, plus intermarriage, is Chekov’s Gun.
Intermarriage is much lower among the Orthodox, and families north of 5 kids are common and expected. Indeed, there are special community institutions designed to make this affordable – which the alt-Right should research to copy. Low intermarriage. Early marriage (indeed, some are still arranged marriages), and the requirement of a religious divorce alongside the civil (you can’t remarry within the Orthodox without a “Get”), tends to lock both men and women down. Women marry early and have kid after kid during their fertile period. They exit the other end well past The Wall. Men are faced with 5+ kids at 40, imagine the child support costs.
It takes about 3 generations for a 90/10 population ratio with these kinds of contrasts to make the 10% a majority – and the leap to majority status isn’t linear. Within the American Jewish community, that 3rd generation is just being born.
Demography is destiny.
DO WE NEED A HEBREW WORD FOR ‘SHITLORD’?
Israel may be different, but only because the Orthodox there are shifting the whole population to be more religious and have more kids of their own. Israel is moving in the opposite direction to most Western countries, and you’d expect that result when a culturally cohesive group with a program like that can be a much bigger slice of the national culture (still only 15-18% – THIS generation).
It’s fascinating to watch.
Liberal Jews are openly nervous, in an era when those Jews who have bowed down to Leftism must pledge hostility to Jewish expression as part of the bargain. Secular/Reform Jews would often rather dialogue with Muslim terrorists than the Orthodox. Which of course. Rabbits gonna rabbit.
You may start to notice unflattering portrayals of Jewish Orthodox, starting recently with kerfuffles about them not wanting to sit next to women on airlines. I expect that to ramp up. And guess who is super-visible and will be targeted first by the Mideast Die-versity mainstream Judaism has shepherded in?
I know you aren’t exactly friendly to Jews. [ed: this is not true in practice. only in the abstract, where ideas about the national question get tossed around] And I get why. Many have betrayed the only non-Jewish civilization that offered them any real hope. That they betrayed their G-d and religion first doesn’t soften the blow much.
All I’ll say is, imagine a group who takes religion seriously, has a tested program that controls hypergamy, has a raw grudge to nurse with Leftism, and believes in various shadings of separation in place. Imagine that such a group becomes the default concept of “Jew” within 20 years.
It’s easy if you try.
Now, the allegiances of that group – and their situation – those are big TBDs. I really wonder if Neoreaction’s Plan (per free Northerner) might work well with this set, when the time comes. And there might be some clever ways to plant that seed now, while strengthening the alt-Right’s program.
Well, let’s face it — a secular Jew will be a lot more fun at a party than an Orthodox Jew. But, to depart from my poolside location for a moment, a nation is more than the sum of its parties.
Here’s a question I have for any geneticists lurking: Are Orthodox and Secular/Reform Jews from different gene pools? That is, do the Orthodox in America (and Israel) hail from different regions than the regions secular Jews left behind for America (and Israel)? I suspect that the differences between the two groups go deeper than religious/cultural preferences.
This gets to my contention that more than cultural experience is at work in the Jewish predilection for open borders leftism and their knee-jerk hatred for even the most innocuous expressions of nationalist populism (e.g., keeping out rapefugees, building a wall). If, as I have theorized, secular American Jews have inherited and brought with them to their new lands a suite of personality traits — the Tikkun Olam Triad — that predisposes them to radical anti-Gentilism and/or pro-Globalism, then this would partly explain the noted observation that Israeli Orthodox Jews aren’t nearly as Left Wing as their secular Jewish-American cousins.
Because, in fact, they may be more like third cousins than brothers.
Anyhow, at the end of the day American Jews (and as the disproportionately influential gatekeepers of the media megaphone, it’s right to address them separately from the garden variety shitlib Gentile) are going to have to come to terms with the reality that opening America’s borders to the world’s wretched refuse (and vehemently chiding those who fight back against their demographic dispossession) will, inevitably, make America more wretched and full of refuse: a much less livable, lovable place that no one, not even rootless cosmopolitans, will want to call home.
You can read this post as a sincere appeal to common sense. To noblesse oblige instead of noblesse malice. Let’s hope there’s enough of that magnanimity left in those still nursing age-old resentments at having to work to fit in.
COMMENTS:
* An example similar to “American Beauty” is the film version of “The Graduate.” Interestingly, the movie is about the pain of being Jewish in a WASP society, but this message was included because of the director’s subconscious bias. It didn’t even make sense in the context of the movie because Hoffman’s character (the Jew outsider) is supposed to be the son of a WASP couple. This ridiculous oversight by the director was apparently parodied in a humor magazine shortly after the movie came out.
* Steve Sailer writes: Nichols likes to claim that he hadn’t realized what The Graduate was actually about until he saw it parodied in a juvenile humor magazine in October 1968:
It took me years before I got what I had been doing all along — that I had been turning Benjamin into a Jew. I didn’t get it until I saw this hilarious issue of MAD magazine after the movie came out, in which the caricature of Dustin says to the caricature of Elizabeth Wilson, ‘Mom, how come I’m Jewish and you and Dad aren’t?’ And I asked myself the same question, and the answer was fairly embarrassing and fairly obvious: Who was the Jew among the goyim? And who was forever a visitor in a strange land?
This may be a story that has gotten better in Nichols’s retelling because the ethnic angle had not been so mysterious to Nichols’s underlings. J. W. Whitehead’s book Appraising The Graduate includes Hoffman’s memory of protesting to his self-confident director the implausibility of his casting:
“I’m not right for this part, sir. This is a Gentile. This is a WASP. This is Robert Redford.” …
Nichols replied, “You mean he’s not Jewish?”
“Yes, this guy is a super-WASP. Boston Brahmin.”
And Mike said, “Maybe he’s Jewish inside.”
During filming, Hoffman picked up his first groupie: ‘‘Beautiful, thin, a real shiksa goddess. I think Nichols took that as a sign — at least somebody found me attractive. And it didn’t get past me, either!’‘
Screenwriter Buck Henry argued for Hoffman’s plausibility in the role by appealing to Cesare Lombroso‘s 1870s theory of racial atavism:
“You know my theory about California genetics? Jews from New York came to the Land of Plenty, and within one generation the Malibu sand had gotten into their genes and turned them into tall, Nordic powerhouses. Walking surfboards. We were thinking about how these Nordic people have Dustin as a son, and it’s got to be a genetic throwback to some previous generation.”
At whatever point Nichols got the idea, he ran with it:
“He couldn’t be a blond, blue-eyed person, because then why is he having trouble in the country of the blond, blue-eyed people? It took me a long time to figure that out—it’s not in the material at all. And once I figured that out, and found Dustin, it began to form itself around that idea.”
Whitehead says, “Nichols wanted Hoffman to project an estrangement that began in the blood.”
In 1938 Nichols had arrived in America from Berlin, where his anti-communist Jewish ancestors had found refuge from the Soviet Union. His father quickly became successful again in the US. And the son became even more so, first triumphing at stand-up comedy with Elaine May, then directing Neil Simon blockbusters on Broadway. His first movie, Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, earned him an Oscar nomination. He’s since completed the coveted EGOT career grand slam, winning four Emmys, one Grammy, one Oscar (for The Graduate), and nine Tonys.
But everybody feels a bit estranged and unappreciated, even if (or especially if) he is Mike Nichols.
Ultimately, The Graduate is about the pain of being Jewish in a gentile society. This theme had been downplayed by previous generations of Jewish filmmakers, who were grateful for how nice Americans had been to Jews. But as the years went by, Jewish-American artists discovered that there was little danger and much profit in violating this old norm.
Not surprisingly, Nichols’s ethnic alienation is reflected throughout The Graduate. In the wake of Israel’s smashing June 1967 triumph in the Six Day War, this proved tremendously popular with the American public at large.
For example, in the first scene in the hotel lobby, the unaggressive Benjamin has to step aside while dozens of pushy WASPs in formal attire shove through a revolving door ahead of him. And, of course, there’s the memorable last scene in which Benjamin rescues his shiksa goddess from her new husband at the Methodist church by swinging a giant crucifix at the resentful blond beasts.
It doesn’t get much more obvious than that.
* One rumour that I heard, possibly via the film critic Mark Kermode, was that even though the character is a tall, good-looking, all-American boy Dustin Hoffman was cast in the role because of the character’s insecurities. Essentially, deep down the character looked tall and confident but felt small and Jewish, ie neurotic. Dustin Hoffman was portraying how the character felt.
* All that blather aside about “how the character felt”, the big tell of the movie’s intention was the final church scene. They love to desecrate churches and crosses (little yid even uses the latter as a weapon and then to bar the doors). And check out the truly Aryan groom and his parents, their distorted faces of hate get REAL close up shots as Hoffman is banging on the glass to disrupt the service.
And oh, that grand finale! Beautiful shicksa bride screams out her love’s name and runs to him, abandoning would-be husband, family, friends, and indeed, church.
A yid nerd’s wet dream… touted to the skies then, and even to this day as an “important, ground-breaking film.”
* Well, plastics IS the future, you know… I, too, loathe the endless blasphemy/desecration/mockery of all things Christian that hwood loves to throw at the public. I want more people to open their eyes to see it for what it is. But, like you said before, people will say, since there was only one scene that showed someone shitting in the Holy water, it’s not an anti-Christian movie. Morons all.
* American Beauty can be summed up in a George Orwell-esque way:
“Normal bad, disordered good!”
* Mike Nichols thought he was making a movie about “The Generation Gap” but was actually just about how WASPs, conformity, privilege, and rules suck.
* I don’t feel this applies so much to British Jews. Three points spring to mind.
1) Michael Howard – Leader of the Conservative Party in the 2005 ran a campaign that mentioned cutting immigration (despite being descended from a central European Jewish family – original name: Hecht). He got attacked from non-Jews for being uncaring. Anti-immigration sentiment was NOT thick on the ground back them.
2) After riots in the early 1980s, the Church of England produced a report itled ‘Faith in the City’ which Thatcher cricicised as containing “nothing about self-help or doing anything for yourself”. By contrast, Britain’s chief Rabbi, produced a rebuttal called From Doom to Hope: A Jewish view of “Faith in the City”, which argued that the Jewish contribution to eradicating poverty “would lay greater emphasis on building up self-respect by encouraging ambition and enterprise through a more demanding and more satisfying work-ethic, which is designed to eliminate human idleness and to nurture pride in “eating the toil of one’s hands” as the first immediate targets” and that “blacks should not look to the state but instead to themselves and take responsibility for their poverty and should learn from the Jewish experience of working themselves out of poverty, educating themselves and building up a “trust in and respect for the police, realising that our security as a minority depended on law and order being maintained”.
3) Keith Joseph – Another Conservative Party politican who was the intellectual force behind Margaret Thatcher. Could perhaps have become party leader were it not for a 1974 speech in which he gave so much RealTalk that outraged everyone at the time despite being spot-on. I’m going to give you the key line that should be carved on Britain’s gravestone.
“A high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers least fitted to bring children into the world…. Some are of low intelligence, most of low educational attainment. They are unlikely to be able to give children the stable emotional background, the consistent combination of love and firmness…. They are producing problem children…. The balance of our human stock, is threatened…”
I am not Jewish but I am British. I can honestly say that in Britain you get more Marxist pseudo-intellectual drivel from the Church of England than from Jews. It seems to be different here (and no, I haven’t forgotten or forgiven the Mandelson and the dreadful Millibands).
* It’s not even about the Holocaust. They’ve been outsiders in the societies of other people for 2000 years. Them siding with outsiders in any society they might be in is just an evolved reflex, genetic or cultural.
* Jews have an epic right tail in 4-8 SDs. As evidence, Nobel Prizes, Fields Medal, etc. are won by non-Orthodox Jews x120-x300 times their global population. Jews have won 22% of ALL Nobel Prizes. I can’t imagine stronger evidence.
You complain that there was no “Jewish Goethe,” but, as you know, this was impossible. Jews were emancipated in 1820. Prior to that they were not writing. Spinoza was published posthumously and was excommunicated for his writings. You are a little hard on Maimonodes, who strikes me as ShitLord, but I am no expert.
It is also worth noting that Christianity has a sublime aesthetic sense and appreciation of beauty. Judaism does not. Christians are inspired by their religion to produce tremendous works of art (or even rejection of Christianity). There were staggering passions at work. Christian culture (1500-1900) will simply outweigh anything any other culture could make, ever.
There were some nice non-Poz Jewish contributions: Heifetz, Mendelssohn, Mahler, and Irving Berlin. I can’t think of any non-Poz writer off hand other than Boris Pasternak.
* Everyone here should watch the Amazon series Transparent. Sure, the transsexual storyline hogs all the media attention. But the bigger theme is the nastiness and misery of a modern secular Jewish family. I’ve never seen a more despicable family portrayed in a drama (when the family is the protagonist).
I wish someone would compile a list of disparaging comments made by Jews, especially Jewish women, about Gentile women. I think this shiksa hatred is a primitive reaction against their sexual competitors and the vitriol exceeds your typical female catfight. Jewish female journalists and politicians were insanely spiteful towards Sarah Palin. Stupid people like Palin can usually be ignored, but Sarah was resented mostly for her attractiveness.
* I think the shortcut to this would be to cull the routines of Amy Schumer and Sarah Silverman.
* Jews are Semites. To paraphrase the future Pope in The Godfather, Part III, for centuries they have been surrounded by Christ (and even interpenetrated with White blood), but it does not live in them. In their instincts, aptitudes, and attitudes, they are creatures of the Desert, akin to the Arabs, the Persians, even the Brahmins of India. Razib Khan and the Jews belong together in the same (pricklish, snotty, fugly) continuum: neither of them in a White one.
Spiritually, they belong in that world, not in the West. Perhaps, in time, they could learn to be happy in it. Perhaps the best destiny for Israel is to accept becoming some sort of Singapore for the Middle Eastern world, a vaguely more equitable (if they can manage it) version of Qatar. Their evident hard-on for Islam betrays this. Whatever individual Jews may– even passionately– believe, MOST of them belong spiritually in an entirely other civilizational context than the White one.
* When I worked for a heavily Jewish tech company in the late nineties I (still blue pill at the time) was struck how freely and openly Jews would denigrate Whites and Christianity in front of and directly to Whites and nominal Christians like me. Naturally enough even a mere hint of something similar towards the Chosenites would set off anti-semitic alarm bells, resulting in severe retribution for the offender.
* Secular Jews are often hard right tail IQ neurotic/narcissistic. The perfect analogue is Tony Blair. Super-IQ Irish Catholic narcissist who backstabbed England with 3 million Muslims out of some narcissistic injury handed to him? Obama has a similar insanely sadistic trait from untold narcissistic injuries (black, no dad, gay teen). Merkel? So, they aren’t Jewish, but they are *Acting Jewish* in their sadistic rage at the Christian male establishment.
Some Jews are WASP assimilated. William Shatner or David Frum are nice examples. Note the conspicuous lack of sadistic “edge” in their personalities. Contrast with Podhorertz who just called me a “jew poseur” because I reminded him that Jews would take the blame if Trump were usurped.
Orthodox Jews are more agreeable people, which is why they chose Orthodoxy and remain loyal to the faith of their ancestors. Israelis heroically risk their lives out of a romantic obligation to the Holy Land. It is self selecting. Jewish dentists are rarely secret agents of the Poz. Jews who choose “literature” or arts are almost always obsessed with promoting the Poz (except John Milius, who was notably a failed soldier).
The dark hard truth: Countries need to be ruled by “in group” hereditary landed elites (oddly, like Trump). That’s how the West ran itself for 2500 years. When you hand power to a Narcissist through Democracy who is “Outgroup” (woman, Jew, Kenyan, Irish, polio victim), they will use their power to vent their sadism to absolve prior narcissistic injuries unless Stone Cold Reactionary (Disraeli, Thatcher).
* I had an interesting exchange with a young Jewish man at a hipster-geek bar in South America who seemed to be rather depressed. An analysis of his mind gives a case study for the “anti-gentilism” side and suggests it may be universal.
He was born in Argentina, but spent some years in the USA and moved back. I went the opposite direction, and he spoke good English, so we had a chat. He said his country is a shit-hole and the women suck.
I asked him why, and he said it was because everybody here is Christian Italian and they all like futbol (soccer). Nerds like him get marginalized, and he resents that because apparently, things that bring people together (like sports and heritage) are just another form of nationalism – which of course he immediately declared the same as Nazi Germany and Hitler.
Normally, a person like this is just a bitter nerd, but the Nazi thing was quite a stretch so I had to throw in some Jew-bait. He seemed like a real philosophical type so I figured he may just surprise me.
* “Israel is moving in the opposite direction to most Western countries”
Liberalism and feminism are preached for western consumption mostly.
Many times i said that Israel, in some ways, looks like the US from the 50s
I will post this again.
In Israel, the only institutionalized form of Jewish marriage is the religious one, a marriage conducted under the auspices of the mostly male rabbinate.
There is very low divorce rate in Israel – 28 % compared to more than 50% in the US and Europe. Probably because in Israel, a jewish woman can not divorse without her husband’s permission.
There is very high birth rate – 3 kids per jewish woman. In Europe, the birth rate for white women is 1,5, in the US – 1,7
The population replacement rate is 2.1
Religion is flourishing in Israel. There are many gender segregated places, and even jewish women who wear burkas like muslims.
There is very high marriage rate in Israel, and very low levels of cohabitation without marriage. Only 3 percent of kids are born to mothers who are not married, compared to 40-50 percent in the West. Only 13 percent of families are led by single parent, compared to 31 percent in the US.
Why is marriage important? Umarried women tend to vote to the left, married women – to the right. In the US, 70 percent of unmarried women voted for Obama, while the majority of married women voted against Obama. Therefore a society with high marriage rate will tend to be more right wing.
A woman without a man in Israel is seen as something to be remedied; a woman without children – an aberration to be pitied.
Parents are highly involved in mate selection for their daughters, which sometimes results in arranged marriages.
A wife must receive permission (called Get) from her husband in order to divorce him, even if he is at fault. A husband can secure a divorce whether or not his wife consents.
The rabbinical court than manages marriage and divorce is all male.
A child born to a married woman from another man is labeled as a bastard (mamzer, which could mean a “bastard”, or a “son of a prostitute”) , and is not eligible to marry another Jew.
A married woman who had a sexual relationship with another man is not allowed to marry the latter once her marriage is dissolved; a Cohen (a man belonging to the priestly caste) may not marry a divorced woman; a woman who has been separated from her husband for reasons beyond her control, such as war or disappearance – may not remarry at all. Moreover, women whose husbands refuse to divorce them are also banned from remarriage.
Same-sex couples are also excluded from marriage. Interfaith marriages are not recognized either, since Judaism, Islam, and other religions impose restrictions on marriage between people of different religions, and in many cases even regard this kind of marriage as void.
The gender income gap in Israel is large – women earn 65 percent of what men earn. The gender income gap in Israel is way bigger than the one in the US and EU.
Abortion is illegal for married women in Israel.
Jews in Israel are not allowed to marry non-jews.
There are vigilante groups looking to prevent jewish women from dating arabs.
According to Avigail Moor, a psychologist who treats victims of sexual violence and a researcher at the Tel Hai college in northern Israel, more than 60 percent of Israeli men and 40 percent of women do not believe that forcing sex on an acquaintance constitutes rape. As for sex without consent in a relationship, 18.5 percent of israeli women and only 17.3 percent of men thought that was rape.
As Peter Beinart wrote in his New York Review of Books essay: “For several decades, the Jewish establishment has asked American Jews to check their liberalism at Zionism’s door.”
* Jewish leftism is anti-God-ism. Jewish atheists hate God for the Holocaust and other hardships they’ve seen, and they take it out on their fellow man.
Orthodox and Messianic Jews are conservative. Jews who respect YHWH are conservative.
* WASP’s are the biggest enablers of Jew power in the modern world. UK and US are filled with idiotic self-hating people that kiss Jew ass every time they can, and continuously parrot the absurd pseudo-intellectual nonsense peddled by Jews on economics, education, feminism, race, religious belief, etc, etc. Latins and Slavs are much less prone to eat up their nonsense, and hence why you don’t see Jews having power to the same extend in the nations where these people are the majority, like one sees them having in the UK and US. Unfortunately, for the western world, because of the influence that the UK and US have on it, Jewish rubbish is amplified and extends to other nations as well, and therefore the degeneracy continuously spreads, like a virus.
* Leftist Jews are secular/reform Jews. When they came to the West, they had two options: to remain in a secluded community or to integrate. Since they were secular, they wanted to integrate. They could integrate by adopting Christianity, but this was the enemy of their forefathers, a kind of ancient taboo.
Or they could integrate by adopting the religion of the Left, which filled the religious void they had in their minds, integrated them to the West and wasn’t a taboo or a historical enemy. In addition, it was the religion of brainy people, such as them. They did that although retaining their ethnicity. Since the religion of the Left, it is anti-Christian and anti-White, they are anti-Christian and anti-White. They have a plus because they are Jews so they remember grievances against Christians.
In short, the Jews that are producing these mayhem are not Orthodox Jews but converts. Converts to the religion of the Left. Their Judaism is vestigial and disappearing, when they intermarry (think Woody Allen’s kids) or have a low birthrate. This is why Orthodox Jews will be the majority of the American Jews in some few decades.
