Ann Coulter & Carly Fiorina

Posted on September 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

A Jewish friend says to me: It is so fascinating to watch the Republican/conservative blogs and websites write about Ann Coulter and Carly Fiorina.

Regarding Coulter, Jews have long been skeptical of her. She is unabashedly Christian. She has led the fight against illegal immigrants. She is smart enough and witty enough to get the best of anyone who challenges her. Notably she remained friends with Joe Sobran even in his exile and she wrote a beautiful obituary for him. As you know official Jewry considered Sobran an anti-Semite on the same level as Hitler. What Jews cannot and will not tolerate is anyone in public discourse who could be considered a public intellectual taking any position which might call attention to Jewish power and influence. It might be acceptable for a Jew to mention it and persons on the periphery such as Steve Sailer might and left wing magazines can have authors, both Jewish and non-Jewish criticize Israel, but even they shy away from raising the issue of influence, power and wealth.

Unfortunately for Coulter she is a frequent guest on Fox although she is not seen on other networks. Therefore, her making her statement about pandering to the Jews, would be perfectly acceptable if during a Democratic debate she tweeted they were pandering to gays, or blacks, or whatever, but here it has to cut off. I feel for her, as I really enjoy and respect her as a polemicist and think she and Donald Trump are the only reason we are talking about illegal immigration at all this election cycle.

My own guess as to why she tweeted out what she did, is not that she was pushing the envelope or thought that what she was writing would be acceptable because of a widening Overton window, but rather that she was drinking. She is smart enough to know when she crossed over the line and it was acceptable to say that Republicans were pandering on Israel, Reagan and abortion. But to ask how many fucking Jews are there in the country is not something she would have written had she been completely sober. In that sense what this reveals is what Mel Gibson revealed when he was drunk as well and everyone interprets it to mean that if you scratch the surface of a goy, there is an anti-Semite beneath the skin. In fact what it means is that only when they are drunk are they uninhibited enough to be honest, but that honesty should not be mistaken for anti-Semitism.

I do not doubt for a second that Ann Coulter does not harbor anti-Semitic feelings as they are thought of. No murderous impulses toward Jews — hers are directed toward Muslims. No hostility to Israel. However, as a descendant of Old Line Northern European stock, raised as a republican in Connecticut she probably does retain some shred of a belief that Jews are interlopers into traditional American culture.

It is also amazing to see how both the Conservative/Republican blogs and the MSM are pushing Carly Fiorina. I don’t know how anyone can vote for her. She supports amnesty, wants us to not negotiate with our enemies, and holds a traditional neo-con/likud view of foreign policy, with absolutely nothing to say about how to help America’s economy. But they are so eager to bring down Trump they are pushing her as an alternative. She would be a complete tool of the same Republican foreign policy establishment that brought us the Iraq war and the Afghani quagmire. She also is taking a very strong position on abortion, which might help her with the 25% that want to see abortion banned, but is a big loser with the electorate as a whole.

Posted in Ann Coulter, Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on Ann Coulter & Carly Fiorina

Why do some Jews support increased Islamic immigration into the West?

Posted on September 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

This story illustrates why there is Holocaust denial. Intelligent Holocaust denial is not about what happened to Jews during WWII. It is about denying that because of what happened to Jews during WWII, we can’t ask questions such as, will taking in Muslim aliens be good for the host society? Do different peoples have different gifts? What about different average IQs among the races? Does diversity make a country stronger or weaker?

A commenter writes:

“To confuse the refugees with the people that they’re fleeing,” he said, “is to make the same mistake that kept Jews out.”

Yet this was precisely the approach taken by Israel when they turned away Darfurians about five years ago. The Israeli government said the Darfur refugees (then a part of Sudan) could not be received in Israel because Israel was at war with Sudan.

Perhaps we should use the Israeli rationale in America. Or at least remind Galut Jews in America of the Israeli decision.

ANAHEIM, Calif. — Arab Americans advocating on behalf of Syrian refugees have found some unlikely allies in their effort to resettle families from the war-torn nation: influential Jewish groups.

Last week, HIAS, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, launched a petition drive calling on President Barack Obama to swiftly open America’s gates to an additional 100,000 Syrians, and the president of the Union for Reform Judaism wrote to the president and congressional leaders calling for a coordinated international response.

“Our great nation must respond immediately by providing safety, food, shelter, refuge and dignity,” wrote the Reform leader, Rabbi Rick Jacobs. “How can a nation built by refugees from political persecution turn our back on refugees fleeing religious and political persecution?”

Omar Hossino, the Washington-based Syrian American Council’s public relations director, singled out HIAS as being particularly helpful.

“HIAS has been consistently calling for more resettlement and pushing back against the discriminatory rhetoric opposing opening the doors to Syrian refugees,” he said.

Last week, HIAS president Mark Hetfield held a conference call with American Jewish organizational officials to talk about his agency’s decision to join with Arab-American leaders in critiquing U.S. policies that limit the numbers of refugees settled in the United States to about 70,000 per year.

Only about 1,500 Syrian refugees have been admitted since the start of the civil war in 2011. Obama announced Sept. 10 that the United States soon would take in 10,000 refugees, but Hetfield said that number was inadequate.

“We are dealing with a global humanitarian crisis to which the entire world must respond,” he said in a statement issued within hours of Obama’s announcement. “If Germany can open its doors to 800,000 asylum-seekers, the U.S., with a population four times the size of Germany’s and a history as a nation of immigrants and refugees, can take 100,000.”

Hetfield appealed to regional Jewish groups to act on the grass-roots level to help absorb refugees.

“The Jewish voice is very influential here, very important and very much needed,” Hetfield said.

Akram Abusharar, a Gaza-born U.S. immigration attorney who handles approximately 80 Syrian asylum cases per month, said HIAS’s involvement was a boost to his cause.

“The Jewish community has more capacity to move the politicians on this issue than the Arab-American community,” he told JTA in an interview.

Responding to lobbying from HIAS, the administration moved in February to provide exemptions for people who provided limited or insignificant support to Syrian rebels who do not pose a danger to the United States.

But more recently Hossino has tracked an uptick in opposition to bringing Muslim immigrants to the United States — especially among Republican candidates and members of Congress. In recent television appearances, Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina said the United States has “done its fair share” when it comes to the refugee crisis. Sen. Rand Paul asserted that the U.S. “can’t accept the whole world” and should adopt a cautious stance toward resettlement.

Hetfield, in the conference call, said concerns about the Muslim and Arab identity of the refugees are misplaced, reminding listeners of similar reasoning when some nations in the 1930s blocked Jewish immigration from Germany.

“To confuse the refugees with the people that they’re fleeing,” he said, “is to make the same mistake that kept Jews out.”

Posted in Europe, Immigration, Islam, Jews | Comments Off on Why do some Jews support increased Islamic immigration into the West?

MSM Reads Chateau Heartiste

Posted on September 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

Link:

– At Breitbart, Milo Yiannopoulos links to an older CH post about sexbots. (Hey, Milo, there’s been a lot of great CH stuff since then that you can leverage for 3,000+ comment gain.) The article is a good read, even if the points made are already familiar to Chateau acolytes. The huge response to it is proof that the topic hits a lot of nerves, and only a shiv tip-dipped in truth frog poison will induce that kind of excruciating nerve inflammation reaction.

– Nick Gillespie at Reason magazine (libertarioid central) swipes right on the Chateau as he accepts the truth of an important game concept: Donald Trump negs his rivals. Like many beta males who attempt to understand game without field experience, Nick doesn’t quite get the neg, but he comes closer than most awestruck outsiders. The neg isn’t “an insult, followed by a compliment”; it’s a backhanded compliment. The insult — and that’s really too strong a wrong to describe the effect, which would be better described as “a tease” — is implied in the structure of the compliment; it isn’t launched like a verbal ICBM. Also, another correction: The neg works on ALL people, but especially women, because it is human nature to seek social approval and acceptance from others we deem superior (or, in the case of women, dominant and charming) to us.

– Although it’s a stretch to call it a “mainstream” site, Free Republic grapples with the game principle of alpha male body language, and how Donald “Can’t Stump The” Trump uses it to his advantage. CH has numerous archived posts on this topic predating the current political pundit fascination with it by years.

– If When Trump wins the Presidency, remember that CH endorsed his candidacy three months ago to this day, on June 17, beating Lion of the Blogosphere’s endorsement by one month. Heh.

***

While these next two tributes to CH’s insidious greatness didn’t directly link to yer ‘umble narrator, they did tacitly pay respect to the Chateau’s Stone Cold Shivthink and provide evidence that CH has widened the Overton Window so much it is prolapsed and leaking off-message memetic viruses.

– Ann Coulter has raised her Game and has earned enough financial independence to enjoy a refreshing sip of freethought independence. We here at CH believe Ann is a secret reader and our je ne sais quoi has rubbed off on her and amplified her preexisting condition to assault people with uncomfortable truths.

– No need for conjecture. Steve Sailer is definitely a CH reader (but only at night, in a gloomily underlit bedroom). He indirectly endorses the CH take on the “””refugee””” “””crisis””” as a case of the German betaboys getting cucked by their leader, the aging broad Merkel, who can’t help but feel long-dormant vagina tingles erupting for invading swarth of the earth armed with acting class, camera-ready sob stories to put over on gullible leftoid equalist Hiveminders.

***

Update: Anatoly Karlin at Unz is also a reader. The Chateau needs a guesthouse.

Posted in Game | Comments Off on MSM Reads Chateau Heartiste

Israeli Opinions On The Syrian Refugees

Posted on September 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

LINK:

* ‘Long live Viktor Orbán!’ I mumble under my breath, for fear of being lynched if I am suspected of racism and Islamophobia.
Syrian and Afghan refugees on and around a dinghy that deflated just before reaching Lesbos

By Benny Ziffer
Published 13:19 14.09.15
I must confess that, try as I might, I could not bring myself to pity the Syrian refugees who were seen streaming across the roads of Europe to Austria and Germany last week. Not even the photograph of the 3-year-old boy washed up on the shore in Bodrum, Turkey – after the boat in which his parents had hoped to reach Greece sank – made a difference. Why can’t I feel empathy with the suffering, like everyone else?

I’ve no doubt I have lost the ability for compassion as a direct result of the French education I received. Was it the philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau who said that compassion is an extension of our egotism? I recall “Is compassion moral?” being one of the most common questions on the French matriculation exam in philosophy. The student is expected to answer that compassion is largely no more than the instinct for convenience, that it frequently has no connection to morality, and that rational people must avoid the pitfall of their convenience instinct.

“You would speak differently if the toddler who drowned was your son or grandson,” people will say, angrily. Those are the people who believe that compassion is obvious in a situation like the one that has emerged before our very eyes, with thousands of people fleeing for their lives from the Middle East to Europe. And it is exactly this argument that closes me off even more from compassion, because that’s an argument which disguises itself as logical but is entirely based on the egotistical instinct.

Moreover, the shock aroused by the photograph of the drowned boy also proved how capricious pity is; what about the thousands of refugees from Africa whose boats capsized in the Mediterranean and whose bodies were pulled from the sea on the shores of Spain and Italy? Why don’t they engender such empathy?

This capriciousness scares me because, on the one hand, we hear endlessly about the discomfiture of Europeans in light of the migration of the poor of the world in their direction. And on the other, we see Germany’s chancellor making a gesture of grandiose generosity – that her country will shelter thousands of refugees from Syria. And we see Germans applauding as the convoys of refugees enter Frankfurt. Where is the logic?

Readers will forgive me if I confess that in this world, in which people have lost logic and wisdom, I have no choice but to rely on those currently deemed the most evil members of the human race. First and foremost among them is Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who didn’t fall prey to the fashion of pity and declared, in no uncertain terms, that the convoys fleeing from the Middle East are unwelcome in his country.

It is absolutely clear to me that the Hungarian prime minister is nationalist and right wing, and thumbs his nose at what is being said about him and his country. As opposed to Germany, which is more concerned about its image than anything else, he doesn’t care when people say his cynical and compassionless stand on the refugees – he also claims they are only pretending to be refugees – shows his country in an inhumane light. To my mind, this should be appreciated, since he is revealed as a person who understands the extent of the damage wrought in this world by postmodern illusions, which have accustomed us to deny the essence and relate only to image and the way things look.

Orbán’s logic is that Europe has amassed bitter experience with the Muslim population multiplying there and taking advantage of Western tolerance to undermine the foundations of liberalism and the assurance of Westerners of the rightness of their path. Therefore, one would have to be crazy to put a healthy head into this sickbed and accept more Muslims, who will continue to subvert Europe from within.

Does this mean Orban is racist and Islamophobic? Or our prime minister, who declared that Israel wouldn’t take in Syrian refugees? My answer to this comes straight from the words of the renowned French writer Michel Houellebecq, who for more than a decade has been waging a literary and intellectual crusade against Islam. When he was sued at the time for racism and Islamophobia, he argued that a person who defends his cultural values against those who threaten them cannot be called racist. He said he had no problem with migrants from Arab countries who wholeheartedly adopt French values. His problem is that many of these people, instead of adopting the values of their host continent, barricade themselves in values that contradict the essence of Europe.

“Long live Houellebecq, long live Viktor Orbán!” I mumble under my breath, for fear of being lynched if I am suspected of racism and Islamophobia. As for the masses of Syrians and others now being welcomed with cheers at Germany’s train stations, I hope they don’t fall prey to the compassion lavished on them.

My family had a similar experience at another time. My father’s father was part of the wave of refugees fleeing Istanbul in the first decade of the 20th century when the Ottoman Empire collapsed, and he was welcomed with open arms by Austria. There, he hoped to build his life. And there he married and fathered my father. But soon the kindness with which he was welcomed was replaced by sick hatred, and they were lucky they had Turkey to flee back to. And so, with the New Year upon us, let us wish each other a little more logic and a little less compassion.

* Columnist Holocaust Survivor, Noah Klieger

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 … 78,00.html

Quote:

It’s the beginning of the end of Europe

Op-ed: The Europeans are failing to realize that Muslim refugees will lead to the complete disappearance of their countries’ tradition, culture and progress and to the establishment of an Islamic rule across the entire continent.
Published: 09.09.15, 10:54 / Israel Opinion

Like everyone, I have also been watching the refugee “invasion” of Europe in the past few days. And an examination of the European Union’s plan for taking them in has finally convinced me that the Europeans still know nothing about what is happening in the Middle East – and definitely not about the danger they are facing.

The European leaders, led by the leaders of Germany and France, didn’t understand anything about 40 years ago, when they opened their gates to laborers from Turkey and the Maghreb countries. Now they are repeating the same mistake – and this time to a much larger extent.

Whether out of innocence or out of foolishness, the Europeans are failing to realize that they are singlehandedly creating fundamental changes in their populations, which will lead in the coming years to the complete disappearance of the tradition, culture and progress of their countries. In other words, in the not so distant future we will witness the end of “classic Europe” and the establishment of an Islamic rule across the entire continent.

Refugees in Munich, Germany. ‘The refugees, who are mostly Muslims, have turned Germany into a territory in which they will set the tone and become the real rulers’ (Photo: AFP)

This may sound apocalyptic. However, it’s close to becoming a fact. Germany, which is willing to take in 800,000 to 1 million refugees every year, is incapable of turning them into full-fledged citizens. On the contrary: The refugees, who are mostly Muslims, have turned Germany into a territory in which they will set the tone and turn into the real rulers.

Just like Germany failed in its efforts to take in hundreds of thousands of Turkish work migrants – who have so far preserved their language, their traditional customs, including vendetta and “honor killing,” and who don’t even turn to civil courts to settle issues like murder but prefer their traditional courts – it definitely won’t manage with the millions of Muslims it is willing to take in now. Not to mention France or Sweden, which are even less prepared.

The EU plan also details the number of refugees who are supposed to be taken in by Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Croatia. But this is just further proof of the misunderstanding of the continent’s leaders: It’s clear that not a single refugee will agree to settle in countries like Bulgaria and Romania, which are among the poorest in Europe, and it’s not at all certain that countries like Poland and the Czech Republic will agree to take in the refugees.

It’s also strange that Europe’s leaders are unaware of the fact that the large majority of their public doesn’t even want the refugees. So in conclusion, it seems that Europe is once again ignoring the dangers it is facing and is failing to realize that this is the beginning of the end of the old continent.

* Europe exploring Israeli solutions to migrant crisis

Bulgaria and Hungary are looking into Israeli designed border fences and systems in order to help tackle the massive refugee crises currently enveloping European nations.
Reuters
Published: 09.03.15, 17:23 / Israel News

Faced with a surge in migration from the Middle East and North Africa, two European countries are exploring the possibility of erecting towering steel security fences along parts of their borders, similar to Israel’s barrier with

Hungary and Bulgaria have made preliminary inquiries about buying the Israeli-designed fences, according to an Israeli business source who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the discussions.

Both EU countries are beefing up their borders to deter migrants, many of them refugees from wars, who are seeking to use them as gateways to richer countries further north and west, particularly Germany.

But moves to throw up such barriers – which could be around 5-6 metres (15-20 feet) high, topped with razor wire and equipped with cameras and motion sensors – would evoke memories of Cold War-era divisions in Europe and exasperate EU officials who say they would not help to solve the crisis.

Bulgarian and Hungarian officials indicated that such discussions about security fences were taking place.

“I presume that such is the case because the cooperation between the (Israeli and Bulgarian) ministries of internal affairs and security is quite intensive,” said Rayko Pepelanov, Bulgaria’s deputy ambassador in Israel.

“I cannot give you any details right now, but I think that we have taken from the Israeli experiences as much as we can.”

Hungary’s foreign affairs and trade ministry said it “does not dispose of information about ongoing Israeli-Hungarian negotiations on buying Israeli-designed border fences”.

The Israeli source said any deals remained some way off, pointing to budget constraints and the political sensitivity in the European Union over erecting fences to control the flow of migrants and refugees from Syria, Iraq, Libya and elsewhere.

“(European countries) all want solutions and see the relevance of our technologies,” the source said. “But they also need EU support and this has not been forthcoming.”

The European Commission, the EU executive, has said it opposes the construction of fences but accepts it is up to each nation to decide how it protects its borders.

“Fences … do not send the right message, particularly to our neighbours,” said spokeswoman Mina Andreeva.

Down to the wire

The type of fence the countries have expressed interest in is the one Israel has constructed along its 230 km (143-mile) border with Egypt, rather than the steel-and-concrete barrier that separates the West Bank from Israel and East Jerusalem.

The Egyptian fence was built over three years and completed in 2013, with the aim of stopping an influx of migrants from Africa and guarding against raids by Islamist insurgents.

The fence cost the Israeli government around $380 million. A similar-style barrier is likely to cost foreign customers about 15 percent more – up to $1.9 million per km, according to industry sources, although hills, forests and other difficult European topography could drive the price higher.

Erecting such barriers would represent a significant step-up in security for Hungary and Bulgaria.

The former is already completing a 3.5-metre-high fence along its border with Serbia, while the latter has erected a fence about 3 metres high on its Turkish border. But the Israeli-designed barriers, as well as being taller, would be more heavily fortified and have more sophisticated electronic defences.

Hungary has emerged as a flashpoint in the crisis, as the primary entry point for those travelling overland across the Balkans. Its right-wing government is among the continent’s most outspoken voices against allowing mass immigration.

But EU officials have been critical of Budapest, with some pointing out the irony of the country that first opened the Iron Curtain frontier with Austria in 1989, before the Berlin Wall came down, taking the lead in erecting new barriers.

Frontex, the EU agency responsible for border management, is opposed to fences and has made clear the European Union will not help member states finance them.

“When you talk about the management of migratory flows, the fence itself is not the solution, just as border control is not the panacea for migration flows,” said spokeswoman Izabella Cooper. “You have to stabilise the countries of origin from which the refugees flee.”

* The consensus view in Israel is skeptical toward German outpouring generosity “In the name of justice and morality, in the name of the desire to give humans freedom, Germany is taking a huge gamble. It may be committing suicide. The far right will gain power, the immigrants will have an influence, the country will change. The one million refugees that Germany plans to take in, and hundreds of thousands who are arriving in different ways, will turn into a large minority within Germany. The chance that they will integrate into Europe’s Western-liberal culture is not high.

Historical experience shows that frustration creates disappointment, followed by children growing with hatred. That’s how it is with the Muslim minority in France, Britain and Holland. That’s how it is with young Western Muslims, the second and third generation of immigrants, who leave their safe home in order to volunteer with the Islamic State in the Middle East and kill other Westerners and Muslims.

Germany can deal with several million Syrian refugees demographically, but it can’t necessarily deal with the long-term outcomes. So it is precisely because of this risk that the change is so impressive.

* ‘Islamization of Europe a good thing’

Rabbi Baruch Efrati believes Jews should ‘rejoice at the fact that Europe is paying for what it did to us for hundreds of years by losing its identity.’ He praises Islam for promoting modesty, respect for God
Kobi Nahshoni
Published: 11.11.12, 13:52 / Israel Jewish Scene

As concerns grow over the increasing number of Muslims in Europe, it appears not everyone is bothered by the issue, including an Israeli rabbi who even welcomes the phenomenon.

Rabbi Baruch Efrati, a yeshiva head and community rabbi in the West Bank settlement of Efrat, believes that the Islamization of Europe is actually a good thing.

“With the help of God, the gentiles there will adopt a healthier life with a lot of modesty and integrity, and not like the hypocritical Christianity which appears pure but is fundamentally corrupt,” he explained.

Rabbi Efrati was asked to discuss the issue by an oriental studies student, who inquired on Judaism’s stand toward the process Europe has been going through in recent years.

Following the election of a hijab-wearing Muslim woman as the mayor of the Bosnian city of Visoko for the first time in continent’s history, the student asked the rabbi on the Kipa website: “How do we fight the Islamization of Europe and return it to the hands of Christians and moderates?”

Efrati wrote in response that the Islamization of Europe was better than a Christian Europe for ethical and theological reasons – as a punishment against Christians for persecuting the Jews and the fact that Christianity, as opposed to Islam, is considered “idolatry” from a halachic point of view.

“Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years were in exile there,” the rabbi explained as the ethical reason for favoring Muslims, quoting shocking descriptions from the Rishonim literature (written by leading rabbis who lived during the 11th to 15th centuries) about pogroms and mass murders committed by Christians against Jews.

“We will never forgive Europe’s Christians for slaughtering millions of our children, women and elderly… Not just in the recent Holocaust, but throughout the generations, in a consistent manner which characterizes all factions of hypocritical Christianity…

“A now, Europe is losing its identity in favor of another people and another religion, and there will be no remnants and survivors from the impurity of Christianity, which shed a lot of blood it won’t be able to atone for.”

‘Islam a relatively honest religion’

The theological reason, according to Rabbi Efrati, is that Christianity – which he sees as idolatry – has a tendency to “destroy normal life and abstain from it on the one hand, while losing modesty on the other hand,” as it “ranges between radical monasticism to radical Western licentiousness.”

Islam, the rabbi added, is “a religion which misjudges its prophets but is relatively honest. It educates a bit more for a stable life of marriage and creation, where there is certain modesty and respect for God.”

Efrati ruled, therefore, that “even if we are in a major war with the region’s Arabs over the Land of Israel, Islam is still much better as a gentile culture than Christianity.”

He added, however, that Jews must pray that the Islamization of most of Europe will not harm the people of Israel.

Posted in Israel, Syria | Comments Off on Israeli Opinions On The Syrian Refugees

Too Many Europeans Choose the Strong Horse

Posted on September 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

Anatoly Karlin writes: Often it is the extreme (nut)cases that best illustrate general social maladies. This story encapsulates most of the constituent elements of the decline and fall of European civilization.

(1) The wild age differentials. You don’t have to be one of those puritan freaks who would slam an eighteen year old’s life for having sex with someone like this at 14, but 29 and 15? That’s a bit too much, man. (Though admittedly just about legal in Denmark).

And the dude already has a wife and kids!

(2) The licentious, totally irresponsible sexual behavior of the lower half of the female bell curve under the banner of feminist empowerment.

Before, this was kept in check through familial, social, and legal strictures. Cavorting with a man double her age with that kind of name would have earned her a spanking, ostracism from the community, and maybe exile to a nunnery. But what is a single mother – she has a stepfather, but he appears to be otherwise absent from the story – to do to control a waywards 15 year old female teenager in a modern European state? Anything much beyond surly disapproval is child abuse, and will be treated as such by Scandinavia’s hyperactive social services. Trying to impart Christian values? Northern European Protestant clergymen make the Pope seem like a paragon of muscular Christianity.

As for society, suffice to say that to SJWs and even some self-styled conservatives, any man making these kinds of arguments is typically denigrated as a “weak” “loser” who is just bitter he “can’t get any,” while any woman who would nod her head to this is obviously under some kind of “false consciousness” foisted on her by the “patriarchy” since according to SJWs no woman who disagrees with them can possibly have any sort of independent agency.

As it is, her mother did try to check Lisa Borch’s self-destructive spiral and got murdered for her trouble.

(3) The avid documentation of all this degeneracy in Instagram, that social media platform most optimized for vapid attention whoring.

(4) All people seek some kind of truth, some absolute moral guidelines to live by. This impulse is much weaker amongst the intelligent, who tend to have the rational faculties and self-control to responsibly exercise freedom. But amongst the lower half of the bell curve, it is predominant.

The modern state has abdicated its responsibility to provide this truth, so people now reach out to all kinds of bizarre cults and ideologies to quench their anomie. This can take arguably positive and creative forms (e.g. transhumanism), or essentially harmless ones (e.g. the deerkin cult on Tumblr), or more malign forms such as the livid nihilism that best characterizes the social justice movement.

If there is one ideology that is most unaninimous and consistent in its insistence on having access to absolute truth, it is Islam.

Women specifically face even greater challenges to their sanity and good sense. That is because all women ultimately seek to submit to a strong man. (Higher IQ women are able to exercise more control over these impulses, while feminist women just have higher demands).

Osama bin Laden, whatever else you might think of him, was a redpilled, intelligent dude. And he said:

When people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature, they will like the strong horse.

Hailing from cultures propagandized by Hollywood as far more virile and vibrant than Europe, unrestricted by European mores that encourage restraint in human relations, and freed from the requirement to “check their privilege” on account of their minority status, Muslims and Islamist males in particular are enabled to act the role of the strong horse.

And thus the dregs of society, bereft of the benign paternalism that would have kept them on the right path in older days, are now clamoring to place their bets against their own nations, culture, and – yes – race (Isn’t “I heard my mother scream and I looked out the window and saw a white man running away” very telling in this respect?).

From hip-hop to jihad, how the Islamic State became a magnet for converts

She was a redheaded rebel, the singer in the family, a trash-talking, tattooed 21-year-old wrapped up in a hip-hop dream of becoming Holland’s Eminem. Then Betsy found Allah.

After her sudden conversion to Islam last summer, Betsy — a name given by her family to protect her identity — began dressing in full Muslim robes. By January, the once-agnostic Dutch woman, raised in a home where the only sign of religion was a dusty Bible on a shelf, began defending homegrown terrorists. A feud with her father over her apparent radicalization prompted her to leave home — turning up days later, her parents and Dutch authorities now say, in Syria, where she would become the bride of an Islamic State fighter. …

The profiles of converts joining the Islamic State often mirror that of Betsy. The child of divorced parents, she dropped out of school by age 14, was busted for shoplifting by 16 and was struggling with a drug problem at one point.

I really do think I understand her. I mean, at some level, it’s a choice between a broken home, chronic degeneracy, and a world of cucked faggots in empty suits always reaching new heights in combining self-importance with impotence… or the swarthy alpha male youths they imported, whose brothers are blowing shit up and cutting the throats of those very empty suits in the eastern deserts.

Here’s a Heartiste meme that aptly illustrates this.

Not a hard choice deciding who’s the stronger horse here! At least, not for 100,000 Brits, most of them younger women!

(5) The legal system isn’t going to cut Lisa Borch’s throat, or even imprison her at least until she’s past her reproductive age. She got 9 years, which means she will be out at 24 years at the latest. Still good for a good 20 years or so of service as a brood mare in the Islamic State.

(6) These problems are most terminal in Western Europe, but its worth mentioning that not even relatively based Eastern European countries are immune to the cancer. Varvara Karaulova is one Russian example (who admittedly doesn’t fit the usual profile for these types – she went to Moscow State University, an elite institution, where she studied Arabic and became a bit too acculturated for her own good). In Ukraine, we have the prominent case of Vita Zaverukha, who ended up committing murders for the European ISIS otherwise known as the Banderite batallions of Aidar, Azov, etc. As the commentator Glossy put it (and diagnosed correctly):

What kind of parents let their 18 year-old DAUGHTER sign up with a death squad during time of war? You’ve got to realize that the junta never had more than 70k people figthing for it. That’s in a country of 40 million. All the caring, functional parents in the Ukraine have already sent their draft-age sons abroad or bought medical papers declaring them schizofrenic paraplegics.

This is what’s left. I’m going to diagnose a broken home and romantic involvement with a Banderite football hooligan/gangster wannabe.

Posted in Europe | Comments Off on Too Many Europeans Choose the Strong Horse

Ann Coulter & The Jews

Posted on September 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

* I count only 6 ‘Trump, Big Loser’ stories on the @politico home page. They’re slacking off. (Mickey Kaus)

* “There’s a momentary guilty hesitation, a tell, when Fox personalities (eg Megyn Kelly) gratuitously/insincerely say Rubio was a winner.” (Kaus)

* “Christie said the magic word that shows a candidate isn’t serious about border control. The word is “drones.” (As in “Oooooh, drones!”)”(Mickey Kaus)

* Mickey Kaus: “Re Coulter: Issue of GOP grandstanding on Israel was enough of an issue in 2013 to be subject of this SNL skit”

* I keep telling everyone who will listen that sex is a byproduct of love and commitment.
Friend: “Not if you’re married to a Jew. She’d rather buy a purse.”

* A human being in my life has contempt for me because I’ve never tried to steal from him. He says that shows a lack of initiative. I won’t identify his ethnicity for fear of perpetuating hateful stereotypes.

* Ann Coulter: Every GOP (other than Trump) wants to start between 5-7 wars, then import every single displaced Muslim into U.S.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Ann Coulter & The Jews

Immigration Is The Issue

Posted on September 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

Ann Coulter writes: Today, the fight in the Republican Party isn’t over abortion, guns or the Sandinistas; the dividing line is immigration. Will we continue to be the United States, or will we become another failed Latin American state?

On this, it’s Donald Trump (and the people) vs. everyone else.

Trump announced his presidential campaign by talking about Mexican rapists. Immigration is the only policy paper he’s put out so far — and he’s been crushing the polls. He got his one sustained standing ovation from 20,000 cheering fans in Dallas Monday night when he talked about stopping illegal immigration.

But James B. Stewart gasses on in The New York Times about Trump’s “name­calling, personal attacks and one-liners that have vaulted him to the top of the polls.” In the entire article, Stewart never mentions immigration.

Perhaps some minority of people will vote for Trump because of his personality. But I notice that it’s his position on immigration that gets thousands of people leaping to their feet.

The media will talk about anything but Trump’s specific, detailed policies on immigration — all while claiming he doesn’t have any “policy details.” The very fact that the entire media — including most of the conservative commentariat — obdurately refuse to acknowledge the popularity of Trump’s immigration plans is exactly why Trump is exploding in the polls.

Trump isn’t trying to imitate anyone. He’s leading on the seminal issue of our time while the rest of the field practices looking optimistic in front of the mirror.

Posted in Ann Coulter, Immigration | Comments Off on Immigration Is The Issue

Ann Coulter Tweets: How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?

Posted on September 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

Moshe Smith posts: “It may be true that the GOP candidates are too focused on Israel. . But once Coulter starts talking about F-ing Jews as if they are not full Americans, she crosses a line, and you shouldn’t cross it with her.”

Are non-Jews full members of the Jewish state? Technically, yes, in spirit? Maybe. So too Jews are technically full members of the USA, just as 2 million Arabs are full citizens of Israel, but Israel is the Jewish state and America is its own unique nation.

Jews are members of a wandering tribe. They (and other members of tribes such as Chinese, blacks, Muslims, etc) don’t have the same relationship to the Gentile nation state as WASPs, for instance.

From Ann Coulter’s Twitter feed:

* Good grief! Huckabee is running for PM of Israel.

* Cruz, Huckabee Rubio all mentioned ISRAEL in their response to: “What will AMERICA look like after you are president.”

* How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?

* How to get applause from GOP donors: 1) Pledge to start a war 2) Talk about job creators 3) Denounce abortion 4) Cite Reagan 5) Cite Israel.

* All GOPs = prolife, pro-Reagan, pro-Israel. Pandering on all 3 tonight was EPIC.

* How about Huckabee, Rubio, Kasich etc talk about Israel’s sturdy and effective border fence?

* I like the Jews, I like fetuses, I like Reagan. Didn’t need to hear applause lines about them all night.

* And half the GOPS would bring the Jihadists here as “refugees.” Could they have talked about that tonight?

FROM USA TODAY:

The GOP debate on CNN was full of zingers, but some of the comments that caused the most controversy were from the sidelines.

Conservative syndicated columnist Ann Coulter posted a series of tweets during the GOP debate that many are calling ‘anti-semitic.” After several candidates addressed the need to strengthen the relationship between the U.S. and Israel, Coulter tweeted, ‘How many (expletive) Jews do these people think there are in the United States?”

Coulter, who has over 600,000 followers on Twitter, said she was the responding to the plethora of GOP support for Israeli relations, during the second GOP debate held at the Ronald Reagan Library in California.

Her Twitter tirade began early in the debate and a string of tweets called out the candidates for what she later called “pandering” to Israel.

Coulter received a mixed response, with some offering support and others slamming the columnist as an “anti-semitic.” Coulter tweeted in defense of the comments throughout the night.

On Twitter Coulter responded to a tweet that said “shame on you,” by explaining that she was calling out Republicans for their worn-out rhetoric. She tweeted, “All GOPs = prolife, pro-Reagan, pro-Israel. Pandering on all 3 tonight was EPIC.”

REPORT: Conservative pundit Ann Coulter is not known for her good manners, but she seemingly crossed a new barrier of hostility Wednesday night when she tweeted offensive comments about Jewish Americans as the GOP candidates debated Israel and national security. Coulter, who seemed to be accusing the candidates of pandering to Jewish voters after four of 11 candidates mentioned their support for Israel in their closing remarks, questioned the number of Jewish people the candidates thought lived in the United States.

Coulter, who has 660,000 Twitter followers, was following the second televised Republican debate held Wednesday at the Ronald Reagan Library in California. She also wrote of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee: “Good Grief, Huckabee is running for prime minister of Israel.” Coulter continued her Twitter rant by noting: “How to get applause from GOP donors: 1) Pledge to start a war 2) Talk about job creators 3) Denounce abortion 4) Cite Reagan 5) Cite Israel.” Meanwhile, Coulter referenced the Holocaust in her review of the debate Wednesday, writing, “The other problem with the Be Reagan strategy is: It’s not 1980 anymore. Reagan’s election is as far away today as the defeat of Hitler was then.”

Coulter has insulted Jewish Americans before. In a 2007 interview on CNBC’s “The Big Idea,” Coulter told Jewish host Donny Deutsch that she wants her dream America to be completely Christian.

Roughly 7 million Jews live in the United States. The four candidates who mentioned Israel during the debate hosted by CNN were Huckabee, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.

After Coulter’s tweet, some social media users said her account had been hacked, while others slammed her remarks. Followers called Coulter “anti-Semitic,” and “desperate for attention,” calling her statement “f—ing offensive.” Others defended her, as #IStandWithAnn began trending on Twitter Thursday morning.

Posted in Ann Coulter, Israel, Jews | Comments Off on Ann Coulter Tweets: How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?

Google: ‘Help refugees and migrants in urgent need. Google will match your donation.’

Posted on September 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

As I was searching for Ann Coulter’s Twitter feed, I encountered this message above from Google.

I wonder if Google would ever donate to help host nation’s preserve themselves from Muslim invasion?

I wish Google wasn’t subsidizing the Muslim invasion of the West.

When I clicked on the “Donate” button, I got this:

Europe, the Middle East, and Northern Africa are facing a refugee and migrant crisis – the world's biggest since the Second World War. Google has donated €1 million (over $1 million) to organizations who are providing front-line humanitarian relief, and we invite you to join us by making a donation today.

To double the impact of your contribution, Google will match the first €5 million (about $5.5 million) in donations globally, until together we raise €10 million (about $11 million) for relief efforts.

Your donation will go to Network for Good, a donor advised fund, and will then be distributed to four nonprofits providing aid to refugees and migrants. These nonprofits are helping deliver essential assistance – including shelter, food and water, and medical care – and looking after the security and rights of people in need. Google will cover all processing fees so that 100% of your donation goes to where it is needed most.

Posted in Google, Immigration, Islam | Comments Off on Google: ‘Help refugees and migrants in urgent need. Google will match your donation.’

Steve Sailer: NYT Caves in to Jewish Pressure to Geld Table of Useful Information on Iran Deal

Posted on September 17, 2015 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes: Oren Kessler, by the way, is a deputy director of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a neoconservative think tank dedicated to denouncing Israel’s enemies. Its biggest donor in 2001-2004 was subprime grifter Roland Arnall, one of the main architects of the Housing Bubble…

I lost interest in the Iran thing a long time ago. Not because it isn’t important, but because in a world where many massively important issues are hushed up, I have much more useful things to devote my attention to than one that is, no doubt, getting its full measure of scrutiny.

If I were interested in having an opinion on the Iran deal, I’d probably want to know what Jewish Democrats in Congress think about it — presumably, bright guys like Chuck Schumer have heard a fair amount of argument about it — just as this handy table in the New York Times provides.

Obviously, nobody in our society except a few idealists is, in general, against counting by ethnicity and other identity politics categories. The New York Times, for example, constantly prints detailed statistics about how white males have too much power in Hollywood. In the press today, “white male,” for example, is an uncontroversial term of derision.

The federal government just sent me a letter demanding I participate in a trial run of the 2020 Census. And, of course, just like in past Censuses, a large fraction of the preliminary Census questions were about things like race and ethnicity.

But the federal government does not count Jews in any fashion. Jewish organizations protested Census plans to have “Jewish” as an answer on the 1960 Census.

The thesis is that Jews hate “Jew-counting.”

But the antithesis is that, of course, Jewish organizations and Jewish media put a lot of effort into counting Jews for the benefit of other Jews. For instance, here’s a headline in the Jewish paper The Forward from last spring:

Who the Jewish Billionaires Are Backing for 2016
Nathan GuttmanMay 21, 2015 Image: Anya Ulinich

The synthesis appears to be that Jewish special interest groups don’t want gentiles to possess any systematic information about Jewish numbers.

Thus, when activists like Oren Kessler see “Jewish?” as a column heading in a table … in the New York Times … they throw a massive hissy fit about its “creepiness” and get it deleted.

They can’t explain by any appeal to principle why it’s so horrible to use modern techniques of quantitative summary like … a table, but they can demonize tables as creepy like crazy to activate the Crimestop mechanisms in gentile heads.

Systematic data on Jewish numbers aren’t supposed to be readily available to dumb outsiders. They’re not supposed to be able to easily find out that the reason so many Republican candidates at the debate practically sang choruses of “Israel Uber Alles” is because, even though there aren’t many Jewish Republican primary voters, about a third of all billionaires in America are Jewish and some of them are Republican donors.

Putting data in tables works against the natural, human desire of Jewish lobbies to have it both ways at all times: Jews are a tiny minority and thus should be pitied or, as the case may be, ignored; while at the same time, Jews are strong and should be feared and obeyed.

Most groups want to do this: Hispanic spokespersons want Americans to assume that they are a minority so insignificant that affirmative action requires only an immaterial sacrifice by white people; while also wanting Americans to assume that Hispanics are a vastly powerful voting bloc that must be placated or they will crush you at the polls.

In response, for years, I’ve been posting Census Bureau data showing that Hispanics are big when it comes to qualifying for affirmative action…
Granted, the tables of Census Bureau data I dig up about Hispanics numbers don’t get as much publicity as the contradictory claims of professional Hispanic activists. But the fact that I’m able to post tables and graphs of official government data on Hispanics showing that some of their claims to power are overblown and some of their rationalizations for privilege are underblown is gratifyingly irritating to the handful of Hispanic activists who play in my league.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Steve is funny. BUT, what Steve doesn’t exactly spell out is just what the Jewish black-out bosses exactly don’t want spelled out—regarding tables. Which is that present-day America is a statistical replica of Weimar Germany where Jewish power is concerned. Jewish Domination of Weimar Germany would make for an incredible ISteve post. But I have to think that’s a bridge too far for Steve, and I don’t blame him. The Nazis were humorless, not to mention unhinged; who would want to suggest, even indirectly, maybe they were right? What I, personally, would like to see are divisions arise about this stuff, so that some Jewish Thomas Sowell comes along and says in a syndicated column that Norman Podhoretz and Abe Foxman are hustlers, are frankly bad people who should be ostracized, as well as a Jewish Dave Chappelle who caricatures that which is egregious about self-proclaimed chosen people prone to paranoia. Let them have their money and their enterprises, but allow the public to criticize shameless bullying and laugh at obvious comedy. That’s all.

Posted in Jews, Latino | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: NYT Caves in to Jewish Pressure to Geld Table of Useful Information on Iran Deal