Dramatic Mold Cleanup At Museum Terrace Apartment Complex In Miracle Mile

A source emails:

There has been a company here, All America, for 3 weeks draining the water and mold from the building (as well as changing our sprinkler heads) which explains why they aren’t giving me the mold and air testing results they took from my unit, even though I have asked for them repeatedly.

I have photographed a bucket that is catching the mold each time they change a sprinkler…it’s jet black filled with mold and disgusting, and we have been breathing it in for years.

So far all is okay. More are being tested. Here is the bucket it’s sick when you realize what we are breathing in. 3 weeks and they are still not done draining it. No wonder they wont put it in writing that there is no mold in my unit.

Posted in Apartments, Health, Los Angeles | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Dramatic Mold Cleanup At Museum Terrace Apartment Complex In Miracle Mile

This Week’s Torah Portion – Emor 5769

Steve Brizel writes:

Kedushas Kehunah and Kedushas Am Yisrael

  • R. Aharon Lichtenstein explains why non-Kohanim can and should emulate the Kohen in our everyday lives: link
  • R. Yisocher Frand illustrates why the Halachos of Tumas Kohanim, even for a minor, serve as the basis for the mitzvah of Chinuch: link
  • R. Zvi Sobolofshy explores numerous halachos related to Kedushas Kehunah and whether a Kohen can be a doctor: link 1 (audio), link 2 (audio)
  • R. Shlomo Riskin and R Avraham Gordimer explain why Kohanim must avoid Tumas Mes: link 1, link 2
  • R. Ephraim Buchwald explains why even a Kohen Gadol must involve himself with the burial of a Mes Mitzvah: link
  • R. Berel Wein reminds us that the Kohanim served both a special role in the Avodah in the Beis HaMikdash and as teachers of Klal Yisrael: link
  • Parshas HaMoados

  • R. Yitzchak Etshalom presents an overview of Parshas HaMoados: link
  • R. Michael Rosensweig explains the relationship between Shabbos and the Moadim: link
  • R. Baruch Simon explores numerous aspects of Hilchos Eruvin: link 1 (audio), link 2 (audio), link 3 (audio), link 4 (audio), link 5 (audio) (and many more as well)
  • R. Asher Brander explores why we do not say Borei Minei Bsamim on a Motzaei Yom Tov: link
  • R. Yissocher Frand, based upon two observations of Rav Shlomoh Zalman Auerbach, explains why Shabbos HaGadol reminds us of the difference between Shabbos and the other Moadim and why there is a custom to use the title “Reb” to call someone up for an aliyah: link
  • R. Dovid Hirsch, based upon the teachings of Rav Soloveitchik ZTL, explains the need for continuity in Sefiras HaOmer: link (audio)
  • R. Dovid Gottlieb discusses how one properly acquires the Four Species: link (audio)
  • R. Asher Weiss explores the foundations of Sefiras HaOmer: link
  • R. Mordechai Willig, based on Breishis Rabbah 61:3, offers another explanation for the death of the talmidim of R Akiva, and exhorts us to refrain from begrudging the success of others, especially during a time of financial downturn: link
  • R. Baruch Simon explains how to use the period of Sefiras HaOmer as a time for reaching a state of Shlemus HaAdam: link (audio)
  • R. Avraham Gordimer suggests why the Halachos of the Lechem HaPanim and the Menorah precede the episode of blasphemer: link
  • R. David Horwitz explains Shavuos seemingly has no visible symbol of commemoration: link
  • Last year’s roundup: link

    Posted in Torah | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on This Week’s Torah Portion – Emor 5769

    Lesbian To Head Southern California Board Of Rabbis

    Gay Reform Temple Kol Ami is kvelling that their rabbi, Denise Eger, got selected:

    WEST HOLLYWOOD, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Congregation Kol Ami, a Reform Jewish congregation serving the diverse community of West Hollywood, today congratulated its Rabbi, Denise L. Eger on her selection as president of the Board of Rabbis of Southern California. The board is comprised of rabbis of all denominations, Reform, Orthodox, Conservative and Reconstructionist, who work together on interdenominational and interfaith issues. Rabbi Eger’s selection as president is a double milestone as the first woman and first openly gay or lesbian rabbi to become president of the Board of Rabbis of Southern California. It is also a history-making achievement because some of the denominations do not recognize either women rabbis or gay clergy; they were able to support her selection as a matter of mutual respect. She will be formally installed on May 11th.

    “We would like to serve as a model for social and political cooperation in these divisive political times,” said Rabbi Eger. “Orthodox rabbis were able to work with us against Proposition 8, because upholding the Constitutional separation of government and religion is more important to us all than specific issues involved with marriage equality. We will continue to forge bonds within and beyond the Jewish community on numerous social-justice issues, because our shared responsibilities must take precedence over individual differences.”

    In recent years the Board of Rabbis of Southern California has worked on food banks, chaplains for local prisons and environmental issues including a novel plan to use modern solar energy to power the ancient eternal lights that burn in every Jewish house of worship. One of Rabbi Eger’s first agenda items will be to address the need for affordable housing in Los Angeles. She notes that religious congregations include political leaders and builders and developers, alongside people who need the housing, offering a unique opportunity to bring all of the constituencies together.

    "Rabbi Denise Eger has been an agent of change in our congregation, in our community, and indeed on a national level," said David Levy, executive vice president of the Congregation Kol Ami Board of Trustees. "We are pleased and proud that she has been given this recognition and that she will have a new, larger platform to continue her good works."

    Rabbi Eger was founding rabbi of Congregation Kol Ami 17 years ago. For the past 15 years she has been involved with the Board of Rabbis of Southern California, most recently serving as vice president. She will serve a two-year term as president.

    It’s about time that a lesbian was selected to lead this group.

    Which Orthodox rabbis opposed Proposition Eight? I only know of Rav Yosef Kanefsky. All the other big Modern Orthodox rabbis in town signed an ad supporting Prop 8, not to mention the traditional Orthodox rabbis who signed as well.

    Jane emails:

    I am in favor of equal rights and am a Human Rights activist.

    Saying that however does not preclude me from wondering about the large number disproportionate number of lesbian Rabbis. This is a result of the massive number of Gay at the American University and Hebrew Union college.

    People should be able to attend any school and major in a field they have chosen. However, the above schools need to address the community’s needs, as well. Just as medical schools or Law schools do.

    There is no point in drowning in an over-saturated field.

    Posted in Rabbis | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Lesbian To Head Southern California Board Of Rabbis

    The Latest In The Brian Dror Bankruptcy

    He had a real estate trust that went belly up.

    Here’s the latest filing.

    Background documents.

    Posted in Brian Dror | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Latest In The Brian Dror Bankruptcy

    Who’s Your Rebbe?

    The other day, I was disciplining a wrongdoer while screaming, "Who’s Your Rebbe?"

    I then proceeded to give a very complicated Talmudic discourse inspired by this blog post on HirHurim:

    It seems that R. Yehudah assumes that you can only have one rebbe while both R. Meir and R. Yossi accept that you can have more than one. It is, therefore, noteworthy that R. Yehudah and R. Meir disagree on the subjects that he must teach you in order to be a rebbe. The Gemara (Avodah Zarah 19a-b) strongly recommends learning texts from only one teacher but learning methods of analyzing multiple texts from more than one teacher.

    Therefore, if a rebbe must be someone who taught you to analyze texts, and we accept the advice from Avodah Zarah 19a-b that you should learn this skill from more than one person, then either you have more than one rebbe or your rebbe has to teach you other subjects as well. R. Yehudah chooses the latter — you can have only one rebbe but he can teach you other subjects. R. Meir chooses the former — you can have more than one rebbe but he must teach you to analyze texts.

    Tzvee posts: "Can you say conflicts of interest? Rabbis issue laws that put themselves ahead of parents – "returning his lost items before your father’s"? Laws that legislate utter obeisance? Methinks this raises a host of moral, ethical and logical issues that ought to be aired."

    Joel Rich posts: "This very observation got me tossed from the Big D’s shiur many years ago. (IIRC it was only viewed as a minor penalty requiring the pretense of going to the office and turning myself in)"

    Posted in Hirhurim | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Who’s Your Rebbe?

    Fixations, Fascinations & Fetishes

    I have a friend, a truly gentle soul, who tells me:

    So this makes me angry. A woman may say, "Tell me what’s on your mind. Tell me your deepest darkest fantasies."

    So finally one day you tell her. You say my kicks come from two things, feeling powerful and delivering a small amount of pain. Not lots of pain. No blood. No injury. But a lick of love. Something that says I am a big powerful man and I can hurt you. You make me feel like a big powerful man. Doing this particular scenario makes me feel like a big powerful man. I want to fantasize that I am a big powerful man who can hurt a woman.

    Why would I be so hung up on feeling like a big powerful man? Because most of my life, I’ve felt like a dweeb. So is it so terrible I occasionally want to feel black? Call me Long Dong Levi. I don’t think it’s so terrible. And then she freaks out and she’s convinced you want to hurt her and that she’ll never be enough and that I’m just going to use her and abuse her.

    This frustrates me because I’m the sweetest gentlest guy in the world. But I have a shadow and I occasionally want to shed some light on it with someone I love, such as my therapist, and I want to be loved even though I have a shadow.

    I don’t believe in acting out my shadow and hurting innocent people. I just like to play. But my therapist Dr. Spielvogel doesn’t want to hear about any of the details. So why are emotions about my family swell to discuss but acting out my emotions doing physical things with someone I love, why is that so low and unacceptable to talk about specifically? Because Dr. Spielvogel feels that way. That’s it. The good doctor has feelings about what are acceptable expressions of emotion and I need to keep what I talk about within that acceptable range.

    So I did this interview and I ask this woman what percentage of men she thought feared and hated women. She said 20%. Then she asked me for my opinion. And it just came to me that virtually 100% of men fear and hate women.

    That doesn’t mean it is the only emotion they feel towards women or that hate is the dominant emotion. But men have to pursue and women get to choose and men inevitably get rejected by women they love and this breeds resentment and fear. And when you find a woman that love you back, you get to work out this fear in healthy sexual ways.

    It’s one of those cliche questions that has lost meaning because it has been used so much. "Do you hate women?" Yes, I hate women. I also love women. I fear women. I respect some women. I adore some women. I’m amused by some women. I’m a complex guy and I have lots of different emotions and don’t go telling me I shouldn’t have certain emotions. That I need to conquer certain emotions.

    So I’m watching this documentary on cartoonist R. Crumb. Fifty six minutes in, he’s talking with a cute ex-girlfriend.

    I’ve never given a damn about cartoons but this documentary intrigues me. I feel a certain kinship with R. Crumb (except I don’t like big butts).

    Ex: "So you’re going to sell these books and I don’t get a percentage? I have a lot of drawings here. What do I get out of this sale?"

    Well, it turns out she has no drawings.

    So she digs in the knife as women do. "You really hated women then. Do you think it’s improved since then?"

    So what can a bloke say to that? Bitch.

    R. Crumb: "Yeah, I hate them a little bit less now."

    The scene switches to a dinner party where the wise and wonderful Dian Hanson, a fetishistic pornographer, holds forth.
    R. Crumb: "I like certain women’s legs. I’m not masochistic. I’m not fixated on feet. I can get into it. I can have an orgasm playing with a woman’s foot but it’s not a narrow fixation."

    Dian: "The mind of a person interested in legs and feet is very different from the mind of a person who’s interested in breasts. Breast men tend to be aggressive, outgoing, athletic whereas people who like the lower body tend to be frightened introverted… It all has to do with being down on the floor when you are a scared little child and looking up at that big tower of mommy. What’s down there? The feet and the legs. That’s where the security is. Women go around feeling victimized by men all the time. They feel like the men have the power. And the area where women can take the power from men is through sex. Men, because they have that fetishtic twist to their minds, because they have the ability to concentrate on one thing to the exclusion of all else, can really be manipulated sexually, while women are not susceptible."

    Let’s just say that my fixation corresponds with that of the aggressive, outgoing and athletic blokes.

    R. Crumb: "Women are susceptible to power. That’s what I find. Any display of power and, oh, he’s so interesting. Gee. Who’s that man over there who’s being so obnoxious and arrogant? Hmm. He’s so interesting."

    Dian: "Robert’s not oriented towards normal sex. There was not much in the way of normal sex in our relationship. Robert wanted piggyback rides and wrestling around. I like to sit around on my heels a lot."

    Wife: "He doesn’t like to take his shirt off. He likes to sit around and not exist."

    Dian: "Robert is a compulsive masturbator. He masturbates four or five times a day. He masturbates to his own comics."
    Art critic Robert Hughes: "I’m sure Picasso did. I’m sure many artists do though I’m not sure many artists give you such a wide range of masturbatory possibilities as Crumb."

    Dian: "People often wonder if Robert exaggerates the size of his penis in his comics. Robert does not exaggerate anything. He is endowed with one of the biggest penises in the world."

    Ex-GF: "The thing about Robert, I always thought he was kidding about them [sexual proclivities]. That he was trying to be funny."

    Here this guy is opening up about such vulnerable matters and his girl thought he was just kidding. That was the only way she could relate to what he wanted. Oh, the humanity!

    Ex-GF: "It was confusing because he was irresponsible. He would call me up and say, I love you. I miss you. I can’t wait to see you. And then I’d go out to buy some groceries two hours later and I’d see him with another woman. And then he’d wonder why I kicked him."

    Crumb grabs her and twists her head a little. "Am I sadistic?"

    Ex-GF says "Oww!" and he lets go.

    Ex-GF: "He would always act like this passive victim of other people’s desires when really he was just trying to get away with whatever he could get away with and walking all over people."

    A female cartoonist: "It is very dangerous to put dangerous sexual fantasies on paper and available to the public."

    This former editor of Ms. Magazine says: "It is important for women to not just run in horror from pornographic images and immediately think that they represent oppression and the power of men to degrade women and to think sometimes that they often are fantasies of having power, they are fantasies of being able to dominate, that come out of a fear of precisely the opposite — of not being attractive to women, impotence fears, and fears of powerlessness in general."

    R. Crumb: "I have these hostilities towards women. I admit it. Sometimes I think it is a mistake. I should not have let it out there. I’d be more well-loved. The whole thing would be simpler and cleaner and easier if I didn’t. But it is in there and it is very strong and it ruthlessly forces itself out of me on to the paper."

    R. Crumb talks about his younger brother Max. "Mary got up to take a bath. We told her not to. Max went into a trance, walked to the bathroom and pushed open the door. Mary was naked. She screamed and slammed the door shut. Max pushed the door open again and then went into an eight-minute epileptic seizure."

    Max: "I started molesting when I was 18. I started with Chinese women for some crazy reason. Then I went through various phases. Now I’m out of it. It’s too much passion. It’s too much animal."

    R. Crumb: "You were in a psycho ward for two weeks."

    Max: "I see this Jewish broad wearing these flimsy shorts. I feel like I have to do something. She goes into a drugstore and buys shampoo and she’s standing in line. I have to risk my whole life for this. I break out into a cold sweat. I walk up behind her and I grab the bottom of her shorts and I pull them down to her ankles and her ass pops out like a ripe peach. And she says, ‘Oh, Jesus Christ.’"

    R. Crumb: "Charles when a teenager used to lie in bed at night and fight the urge to go to the kitchen to get a butcher knife and drive it through my heart."

    Charles: "I know where the homicidal tendencies stem from — from an excessive degree of narcissism… When narcissism is wounded, it wants to strike back at the person who wounded it."

    Max likes to meditate for a couple of hours every day while sitting on a bed of nails.

    He goes out every day with his beggar bowl. It’s a spiritual practice I’d like to emulate at the corner of Pico and Robertson.

    The documentary also describes R. Crumb’s racism. It made think that while I have the occasional racist feeling, I have never treated anyone badly on account of their race, while I have often been treated badly by blacks solely because I was white.

    Interviewer: "Robert, how do you feel about leaving your family behind [as Crumb moves to France]?"

    R. Crumb: "I don’t have any feelings about it."

    Wife: "He only talks to his mother or brother Charles once a year."

    A year after the filming ended for this documentary, Charles committed suicide.

    Posted in Art, Personal, Pornography, Sex | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Fixations, Fascinations & Fetishes

    Rabbi Yaakov Emden Was Almost Seduced By His Cousin

    I’m listening to a lecture by Dr. Marc B. Shapiro (for Torah in Motion) on the Nazir, Rabbi David Cohen (1887-1972).

    Dr. Shapiro talks about the diary of Rabbi Jacob Emden (a great Talmudist of the 18th Century): "We have nothing compared to Augustine’s Confessions. The closest thing we have to Augustine’s Confessions, someone talking about their spiritual life and their growth, is Rav Dovid Cohen’s spiritual diary… The whole notion of an autobiography is not a traditional [Jewish] genre. Yaakov Emden is the first to do it but it is not something rabbis have traditionally done… That’s the exception that proves the rule because it is so unusual. And that is not a spiritual autobiography. That’s an autobiography that discusses all the machlochet (arguments) he had in his life. He talks about various sexual things that you couldn’t imagine a gadol Yisrael (great one of Israel) writing about. Very strange. Whether it ever appears in English. [Rabbi] J.J. Schachter was supposedly going to publish it in English but nothing seems to have happened.

    "Yaakov Emden wanted people to read this. He thought this was part of Torah also."

    Dr. Shapiro does not note this, but Yaakov Emden’s autobiography was very much the XXX-Communicated of the 18th Century. This "Rebel Without A Shul" spiritual autobiography by a great sage in Pico-Robertson is the closest thing we have as Jews to Augustine’s Confessions.

    Dr. Shapiro: "Reading about how he was almost seduced by his cousin and he was able to overcome it makes for strange reading, but he then uses it to prove a point that the yetzer hara (evil inclination) has no power over him. Of course you have all sorts of other attacks on rabbis."

    "I don’t know if the Chafetz Chaim ever had semicha (rabbinic ordination)."

    Dr. Shapiro says Rav Kook was not a vegetarian.

    Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Rabbis | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Rabbi Yaakov Emden Was Almost Seduced By His Cousin

    Hebrew Union College Keeps Open Its LA Campus

    NEW YORK (JTA) — The Cincinnati and Los Angeles campuses of the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion will stay open, according to the Cincinnati Enquirer.

    Discussions had been under way to close the two campuses of the Reform movement’s seminary in an effort to save the financially strapped HUC millions of dollars per year. But in a meeting of the seminary’s board of governors Monday, the idea apparently was scrapped.

    THE JERUSALEM POST SAYS:

    Reform and Conservative seminaries – the institutions charged with providing the overwhelming majority of affiliated American Jews with their religious and educational leadership – face budget cuts so severe that their missions may be imperiled. The congregational arms of their movements also are in grave financial straits, and American rabbis generally face a shortage of jobs.

    …IN FAIRNESS to the masses, the Reform and Conservative movements have yet to make a compelling case for their role in American Jewish life. They seem reluctant to insist on the importance of their training rabbis, despite evidence that most American Jews have no real notion of the seminaries’ existence. Rabbis are like babies; they apparently are delivered by storks.

    To listen to some of the seminaries’ pronouncements often sounds like listening to American automakers, with pledges to cut back, retool and emerge leaner, stronger and dynamic. And at the end, the automakers will offer a product that the public may not want or need.

    We will continue to see Jewish newspapers reporting on "who can be a rabbi" and in some parts of the US, some will waste a lot of energy debating "who can be" – without looking at "will there be" rabbis.

    Posted in Conservative Judaism, Reform Judaism | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Hebrew Union College Keeps Open Its LA Campus

    Orthodox Rabbis Lead Fight To Muzzle Alleged Victims Of Abuse

    ABC News reports:

    Engelman’s is among a handful of publicized cases of alleged abuse within the insular Orthodox Jewish community. But alleged victims and their advocates say it is far from an isolated instance.

    The Brooklyn district attorney’s office, which last month announced a hotline for alleged Orthodox sex abuse victims, says it has 19 active cases of alleged sex abuse in the borough’s Orthodox Jewish community. And advocates say the problem extends beyond Brooklyn.

    "If you’re a pedophile, just go to one of the orthodox communities. You’re probably safest there," said New York State Assemblyman Dov Hikind, himself an Orthodox Jew. "It’s sad for me to say that, but it’s true."

    …The rabbi, Moshe Heinemann, said he did not recall the lawyer admitting what had happened or asking him to leave the community. He declined to discuss the allegations further. Several other Baltimore rabbis declined to discuss the issue of sexual abuse.

    "It was really shoved under the rug and ignored. I’m resentful for all that," Weissberg said. "It’s something that people always think it’s not going to happen to my kid. We don’t want to hear about it.

    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY RABBI YOSEF BLAU TELLS THE YU COMMENTATOR: "Theoretically, one should not want to try people in newspapers. Newspapers are not objective sources. People can be convicted over media which is unfair. Media is not a trial. It does not necessarily produce accurate results. But having said that, in a practical sense at the present time, the newspapers have proved to be a very effective tool, perhaps a necessary tool, because of the community. Obviously, the problem of abuse is not restricted to any one community; I don’t want to even think that. The Orthodox Jewish community, which is one that is uncomfortable with acknowledging problems in the community, tends to therefore deny the problems. The media has turned out to be, to play a very important role in forcing the community to confront the issues rather than stay in denial. And in very specific situations, the media has been really responsible for something happening. There are specific cases- one well-known case in the Modern Orthodox community was the case of a very prominent, perhaps in many respects, the leading person at NCSY for a quarter of the century, very charismatic and unfortunately also very inappropriate in his behavior with teenage women in one way and in another way with teenage boys, sexual things with the women, kicking the boys in the groin, and nothing was done until a Jewish weekly ran articles. Similar things in the Chareidi community – the community gets angry at the newspapers and thinks they are anti-Orthodoxy. And sometimes, not always, that is true. But it’s also true that if a community does not face the issues, they fester. Since in general (and there are exceptions to every rule) but in general, sexual abusers do not change. They do not get better. Even with treatment, the repeat rate of offense is extremely high. Even if there is a relatively small number of people [who are abusers], if they are not stopped, they can harm tremendous numbers. The examples I mentioned, this person who was a youth leader; there are also examples of teachers in schools, a teacher can affect hundreds and hundreds of kids. In our community, it is very hard, because of the way the community looks at people who have been victimized. There are literally people who think that if this information gets out it will hurt the victims’ families for shidduchim. And the community has not, up until now, faced the issue squarely, so the media is the only way to get attention. Similarly, in New York, more attention was given when an Orthodox assemblyman in New York started commenting about sexual abuse cases on a radio program that he gives. That unfortunately makes it almost a necessity to publicize. Otherwise, these people just go and hide. So the media can play a very important role in dealing with it; it’s important that the media be very responsible in this regard. If they spread stories about someone who is actually innocent, they can destroy someone’s life."

    Posted in Abuse, Orthodoxy, Rabbis | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Orthodox Rabbis Lead Fight To Muzzle Alleged Victims Of Abuse

    The Lives of the Gedolim

    Dr. Marc B. Shapiro gave a lecture for Torah in Motion on writing history vs. writing hagiography.

    Near the end, he takes a question: "Why should we be tolerant of the hagiographical Artscroll approach? Just to take it to a large extreme, you could argue that the Palestinians have written a revisionist history of the Middle East and have done a good job of convincing a good segment of the world population of that history."

    Marc: "Israel also has a revisionist history. They have their own national myths. The idea that no Arabs were pushed out, that they all left on their own, that they were going to come back when the land was conquered, that was a very important part of the national myth when Israel was founded otherwise Jews would demand, how could we have these people as refugees? Now you have people like Binny Morris and others show that it is not true. That Israel did drive many people out. Binny Morris’s point is that we should’ve driven them all out."

    "If you read my blogs, you’ll see that I am a relentless exposer of the fraudulence not just in the chareidi world but in the Modern Orthodox world. It all needs to be exposed. But that doesn’t mean that every simple person needs to know… As Rav Kook says, if they come into our world and try to affect us with their fraudulent stories, it needs to be exposed. But if they want to live by these bubbemeisers (old wives tales), that’s a way of life. I’m like Rabbi Slifkin in this regard. Only if it threatens to interfere in the wider community. And for the intellectuals. Anyone can go on the internet and find books by me and others.

    "The son of the first Lubavitcher rebbe, Moshe, converted to Christianity. Any Chabadnik who’s intellectually honest knows this. Do I need to go to the simple Chabad person and start telling him this? They just can’t grasp this. I don’t believe in universal enlightenment. Universities used to be places for elites… In America, they got the idea that everyone needs a university education."

    "It’s hard to know what lashon hara (gossip) is. You don’t really know what lashon hara is. I have read many letters of gedolim and they are full of negative comments about other rabbis, which you would say is lashon hara. As anyone knows, they badmouth them all the time. If you asked the rav, he would say it is not lashon hara. The Torah says you have to expose chanafim (hypocrites, flatterers).

    ("The admonition to expose hypocrites is stated in Yoma 86b where it is derived from [the legal category of] Chillul HaShem" emails Marc in reply to my question.)

    "We are supposed to expose hypocrisy. I would say that if you asked all these rabbonim who say terrible things about other ones and were great talmidei chachamim, if you asked them, they would say it is not lashon hara, but he’s a fraud and I have to expose him. It could be that he’s not a fraud and that it’s just a personal dispute.

    "I don’t think it’s lashon hara to talk about a dispute that the whole world knew about and it was in all the newspapers… If a certain rav did a bad thing. There’s a rav, not a gadol of the first calibre but of the second calibre, but he had a child out of wedlock when he was about 17 and in yeshiva. About 20 years ago, one of the Israeli newspapers exposed him and published the birth certificate. I think that’s a terrible breach of privacy. He made a mistake when he was young. I don’t think it’s anyone’s business. I would never expose something like that. If I knew about it, I would probably choose not to write about him because how could you write about him and not talk about it?

    "If there was a case like this where he abandoned the girl and wanted nothing to do with them and then he became a big scholar, a Talmud Chacham, a posek, I don’t think that’s lashon hara. This would be an example of exposing the hypocrites."

    "I try to balance Jewish values with secular values. As a secular historian, you go into a grave and dig up the body if you need to. They dug up Zachary Taylor’s body to see if he was poisoned. I would have no problem as a secular historian if I was writing about a figure like Einstein, but among gedolim, I do not do that. I can honestly say that I’ve never had to make that choice with Rabbi Yaakov Jechiel Weinberg. I would rather not write about somebody than have to cover something like that up… Certain great rabbinic figures, I would treat differently than other figures. If that is not in correspondence with historical [analysis], what are they going to do? Take my tenure away? Life is not only about historical craft."

    Dr. Marc B. Shapiro posts to Failed Messiah:

    What I was trying to say (and you have to hear it, as reading a transcription of a lecture does not always come off so good) is that there are times when I would choose not to write about a certain figure. If I didn’t think I could do an honest job, and to do an honest job meant to slaughter some sacred cows, I might choose not to write about this topic. I choose what topics to deal with. I don’t have to discuss every historical personality. If I am uncomfortable with dealing with a certain figure, for whatever reason, there is nothing wrong with choosing not to deal with him. What would be dishonest would be to write about X and cover up certain things. Then you would not have an authentic portrayal. But what is the problem with choosing not to write about something?

    Here is an example: If I was writing a biography about politican X I would report about the child he father out of wedlock and supported throughout his life. But if a great rabbi (not one of the phonies) made this mistake, and lived up to his responsibilities, I wouldn’t want to make this public. I wouldn’t want to tear him down. But I certainly couldn’t write a biography about this person and leave out this information. So the answer is not to write about him.

    Many archival collections have restrictions barring access until after the death of an individual or sometimes even many years after the death. This is not in opposition to any historical standard. That was my point

    Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Rabbis | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Lives of the Gedolim