My Uncle Val Is Dead

My uncle Val (my dad’s older brother) has died at age 87, the same age his parents died (I lived in Australia then in 1984-1985 with my brother). My dad and his brother had an awful upbringing with a selfish neglectful mother. Val had it hardest. He served in WWII. Became a communist. Was filled with rage all of his life. Shunned my dad when he became an Adventist, then came back into dad’s life when my mom got cancer. I remember Val as argumentative, stubborn, but good-hearted and very generous. In his final years, he suffered a nightmare situation. He rolled out of bed, got trapped in his bedsheets, and couldn’t get out. A neighbor found him a few days later.

Looking at Val and his wretched unhappy life, I see what my dad could’ve been if he hadn’t embraced God and religious causes. Val was hopeless and bitter. My father is filled with faith.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on My Uncle Val Is Dead

Letting Go Of The Rage

T: “Can you imagine what it would be like to let go of your rage at your parents and just live for you? What would your life look like?”

L: “I’d be like a nuclear-powered submarine without any nuclear power. The fuel that drives my life would be gone.”

“It’s unimaginable to not have that rage. I wouldn’t be me. I would be thrown. Lost. It would be a whole new world. I imagine I’d be less driven. I’d do less writing. There was some screenwriter who gave all the hookers in his stories the name of his mother.”

“It would be like coming out of a coma and having to relearn everything.”

“My rational mind says that letting go of the rage would have to be a good thing. It would be scary. It would be stepping into an unknown world.”

“It was a cold house. A house of sickness. When I had CFS and was stuck at home, I knew I would never get well as long as I was at home. My parents knew lots of doctors but I was never going to recover at home. I knew there were solutions in the world if I could just connect with people. So I started placing lots of singles ads. I knew I could connect deeply with at least one in a hundred persons. I wanted to connect with the opposite sex, hoping that she could get me well. I met someone who introduced me to her psychiatrist who prescribed me Nardil and I started to recover. I knew that could happen years before it did. I was too sick to go out on my own. I needed help.

“That relationship was on the phone for four months. Our first three days together were great, sex three times a day. Then it went all down hill. I got paid for house-sitting and she wanted to take my money to buy clothes for me. I refused. It was our first fight and we never recovered. We just kept spiraling down. I stayed with her for three months. To get me out of the house, she spent the night with her ex. A couple of days later, I was crying at synagogue. These weird people said I could stay with them rent-free in exchange for chores.

“I met Dennis Prager at a speech. He said he might have a job for me if I was in LA. I moved to LA.

“I fucked my way to health. I figured that through that kind of connection, I could get the help I needed.”

T: A lot of using of women? They’re a tool? You’re feelings about women may have started with your step-mom, but were assisted by your using of women?

L: Seduction is addictive. The first girl who taught me how to kiss, that was a high. Sex was the greatest rush in the world. It made all my problems go away. It develops such a strong bond. And then women do all sorts of things for you. And it’s so quick. Sleeping with a woman once usually creates a tighter bond than 20 dates. Once you’re inside of a woman, you are in her heart and soul and social network. Then they start doing things for you. It’s great. I was a smart, good looking, charming guy.

I liked the chase and the courting and the capture, even if it all takes place in one night. Once you screw someone, it’s like you’ve caught a wave. And you can just keep riding that to shore. Sometimes that wave can go on and on for weeks. And I don’t have to do anything extra. I can just keep riding it. The wave keeps carrying you, sometimes for months. That wave takes you to new worlds, to recovery, to health, to trips and connections and doctors and career advancement and spending money and gifts. Eventually, every woman tires of not getting much back so they give me books like The Givers and the Takers. The wave dies but it was so much fun while it last, you just had to catch it at the peak, paddle hard for a few seconds and then down you go into the surf, riding the wave to shore. I love that ride. I’m attracted to generous women. Women who like to give. I like to take.

Those aren’t the exciting relationships for me. They are the nurturing sustaining relationships. The exciting relationships are with cruel manipulative women. I never know what’s what. They spin me round, right round. They have so much contempt for me. I adore them because they’re so busy. They seem so capable. I dream that they will rescue me.

We get high from each other right off. I make her feel powerful and needed before I start draining her and she runs off to her addictions while I obsessively run after her. I’m the love addict. She’s the avoidant. Sometimes I’ll pull myself back and become avoidant and she’ll become the love addict.

It’s exciting. We break up multiple times. Get back together and have crazy intense sex. What we lack in intimacy, we make up for with intensity.

One girlfriend said to me just before my 40th birthday, what do you get for the guy who has nothing?

I had the urge to be rescued. She had the urge to rescue. We were both coming from sickness.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on Letting Go Of The Rage

What I’m Learning From My Solo Show Class

It’s when I see my classmate Michael Kass perform that I realize what a one-man play is. I feel kinship with what he talks about. When he performs, I see what a performance looks like, what a solo show looks like. When I hear myself get up, I hear a lecture. There’s such a dramatic difference between a play and a speech. It’s like I get up and read a song while Michael stands up and sings a song. It’s not scary to read a song, but to embody a song, that’s scary. I hear Michael launching into song.

I need to take that leap into being the character, not discoursing on the character.

The turning point in my story is when I realize that I can’t get to where I want to go by applying my will power. My will was corrupt. I needed to turn my life over to God. I had to accept my crippling emotional addictions and to seek help for them.

I’m thrown by the connection thing. I thought I was connecting and I wasn’t.

Teacher: “Just go deeper.”

So connection means going deeper. Not getting stuck in your head.

Teacher: “The actor has to know who he is talking to.”

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on What I’m Learning From My Solo Show Class

Nechemya Weberman Guilty on 59 Counts of Sexually Abusing a Young Satmar Girl

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on Nechemya Weberman Guilty on 59 Counts of Sexually Abusing a Young Satmar Girl

I Struggle To Connect From The Stage

I intended to talk about my experience of working the 12 steps for recovery from emotional addictions but get sidetracked into discussing my preacher daddy, how my HD big screen tempts me, how I’m a genius and all sorts of other awkward topics.

Q: So who are you talking to? Who are you making the audience?

L: I’m answering a question about what it is like to work the 12 Steps and how that made a difference in my life.

Q: Whenever we talk, we have to know who we’re talking to. You can make the audience a friend or a 12-Step meeting but you have to know because that determines what you say and how you say it.

I also stopped you because I want you to notice when you’re feeling connected and when you’re rattling off. I want you to practice connecting. I want you to notice how you feel about what you’re saying. Start dealing with what’s happening as you’re being witnessed.

What was it like the first time you said you were an addict?

L: It was effortless because I’ll try anything that I think might improve my life.

Q: Why are you in a 12-Step program?

L: Because I progressively realized I have crippling emotional addictions.

Q: What do you hope will happen if you change?

L: I hope I will live free. It means I will never sleep with anyone that I regret the next day.

Q: What would be a happy life?

L: Where you build things instead of creating a life where you know that this is all going to end horribly. I’ve gone through my life knowing that everything is going end horribly. Everyone is going to feel burned by me.

Yesterday, I had all day to write and I only wrote for three hours. At a higher level of functioning, I would’ve written for five hours. A beautiful life means producing beautiful writing. That’s as important as anything.

I have this fear that life is passing me by. This is the sixth night of Hanukkah and I have not gone to one Hanukkah party. My feet hurt (plantar fascitis) and I’m broke. I sit at home watching Netflix and think that I should be out there living life.

For Hanukkah, my boss bought me a 32 inch high def monitor/TV.

So I’ve installed it at home and it makes me wish I still looked at porn. I’ve never seen porn in high-def.

I quit looking at porn two years ago. I never had a monitor bigger than 22 inches. Now I have this monster installed and I’m only using it for holy purposes. I could probably get so high if I relapsed into my bad habits, but praise be to God, I’m on the straight and narrow these days.

With my intimacy disorder, my big screen is just another excuse to avoid contact with people. My boss said to me, you like to watch. You don’t like to talk to people on the phone. You just want to email and fax.

In some ways, my social isolation and intimacy disorder are getting worse. I go out, I go to synagogue, and I want to go home. I’m not connecting with anyone. Unless there’s someone there I really want to talk to, I want to go home. I don’t really care about the prayers. I do them. I know I should do them. I see other people connecting. I may be there for four hours and not have one meaningful conversation. I may be there for four hours and I’ll eat my lunch with the old men who don’t speak English.

Q: What makes you observant?

L: It’s a commitment I took on. I know it’s good for me. It gets me out of the house. Orthodox Judaism is a terrific way to connect with people. It has been for me in the past. I’m not sure where the wheels came off on my Jewish journey. My vehicle is grounded. All the wheels are off and it’s up on blocks.

Q: Is this your tribe? What do you have in common?

L: A way of life. Certain ways of thinking and practicing. Text.

Q: How are they not your tribe?

L: If I go to shul and there’s no one I want to talk to.

I was telling my therapist this week that I’m a genius when it comes to writing and public speaking. Genius is just a metaphor here for solid confidence. Nothing anyone can say can shake my belief in my ability as a speaker and writer. I’m solid.

Q: Because you know you’re IQ or you decided that?

L: Because my mother when she carried me in her stomach, she confided to my father, “This one is going to grow up to do something great for God.” My parents told me this story often while I was growing up. They meant to encourage me in Godly ways.

In the year 2000, when I got the diagnosis of Narcissistic Personality Disorder, they realized they had created a monster. And so they stopped telling me that story.

I’ve always had that conviction that I was a genius. That I was slated to do great things for God. When I started writing at age eight, I got enough affirmation on that, I knew that I was a genius writer.

Q: When did you know?

L: In second or third grade, my class sat on this bridge across a creek and we were told to write about what we saw in the water, these pale ghostly logs. I jotted down my observations, frustrated that I couldn’t get them to cohere. When I read them aloud, people were moved. I was told I had written poetry.

I’ve had 5,000 experiences like that over the course of my life.

My dad was a genius public speaker. I had the same temperament as my dad. I knew I could be a genius public speaker like him. I saw him go all around the world. He’d speak. He’d mesmerize crowds. People would love him and they’d give him things — travel and gifts and hotel stays. I thought, I’m better than my dad. I could be a better public speaker than him. I’m wise and smarter than he is.

Q: What would he say about that?

L: He wouldn’t agree.

Q: But what would he say?

L: He’d get a wry smile. If he felt like I needed encouragement, he might try to encourage me. He might say, maybe you are. Go out and do it. Good on you.

Because I’m a genius, that entitles me. When I have girlfriends, they often volunteer to clean so that I can concentrate on my genius, on my writing. They love me and they want to support my genius. I get my girlfriends to read my books and my essays.

Q: Did your father teach you anything about writing and speaking?

L: My life is a deconstruction of everything my father stands for.

Q: Has his style impacted you?

L: Yes. I want to be the opposite.

Q: Did you ever try to be like him [as a Christian evangelist]?

L: No. It creeps me out.

Q: Why?

L: I think it’s a fraud.

Q: You don’t think it’s genuine?

L: He genuinely believes it.

Q: What creeps you out?

L: The over theatricality. The giving people what they want — assurance of their heavenly salvation. I want nothing to do with what my father does. I want to do the opposite.

Q: What’s the opposite?

L: It’s honest. It’s self-aware.

Q: What’s the fake part?

L: The preaching about love and forgiveness and putting your faith and trust in God and letting go of resentment and fear.

Q: How’s that different from the 12 Steps?

L: The 12 Steps sounds very similar to that, without the explicit Christianity. The 12 Steps is almost identical to the way I was raised. The difference is in preaching this message versus living this message. It’s easy to preach about having faith in God and letting go of fear and resentment but it is challenging to live a life free of fear and resentment.

There’s no preaching in 12 Steps. There’s sharing. You share what you struggle with and what you found useful.

Q: Is there love and forgiveness in Judaism?

L: Plenty. And in Christianity. It is one thing to preach about love and forgiveness and another thing to live it.

Intimacy is hard. It drains me.

Feedback from my class: “If you want to be the opposite of your dad, what does that make you? When you started to talk about your dad, this epic story started to unfold. It’s not about the 12 Steps. It’s not about Orthodox Judaism. It’s about somebody trying to escape from the shadow of their father. Growing up a Seventh-Day Adventist, you seem to be on this journey throughout your life to replace that, to give you those structures.”

“The one time you became physically invested in everything you were saying was when you were fantasizing about what porn would look like on your HD big screen. You’ve given up porn but that doesn’t mean the desire to see it is gone. That means you’re exercising ridiculous amount of self-control to not put porn on that 32″ screen. You lit up like a five year old at Christmas. You could do a five minute monologue on how great porn would look on your TV at home. This is the gift that was given you. It’s beautiful, hilarious and heart-breaking. You see a 32 inch HD TV and you fantasize about porn.”

“I wanted to see you doing your father more, becoming him.”

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on I Struggle To Connect From The Stage

How Do You Talk To Overweight Women Who Want To Marry?

“Are we doing over-weight women who want to get married a favor when we just tell them how great they look? Over-weight in women is like death. You don’t confront it.” (Dennis Prager)

Dennis raised this matter on the Red Eye show last night but it was so sensitive, no other panelist wanted to touch it but off the air, they all agreed with Dennis but didn’t want to say so on the air. Apparently, several of the women behind the scenes on the show are over-weight.

Just one stranger calling you “fatso” can change your life. That’s what happened to author Greg Critser and led to his 2003 book on fat.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Comments Off on How Do You Talk To Overweight Women Who Want To Marry?

STEP FOUR OF THE TWELVE STEPS

I blogged out my first three steps. One Two Three

I went to meetings for a year before I bought the book and started working the 12 Steps.

It was hard going at first because I’d never hit bottom. I’d had some dark days and nights getting lost online, but I never had an addiction. These bouts of curiosity only lasted a few days, a few weeks at most, and then burned themselves out, and I moved on to a productive life. I was a seminal blogger!

I’ve had some dark nights of the soul with my relationships (none of which have lasted longer than a year). I have this fear of abandonment and when I love a woman, I hang on to her too tightly. I make her my higher power. She’s the greatest thing in the universe to me and I obsess about our relationship. This always leads me to suffocate her and many of my most loved girls have gone out and slept with other people just to get rid of me.

When my love abandons me (or when I lose a good friend or a job or a community), it stirs up unresolved lack of attachment stuff from my childhood and I feel lost in a big world, but I’ve never been suicidal. I’ve never been incapable of taking care of the tasks in front of me. I just get a little weepy after every break-up.

At age 44, after about six years of therapy, I realized that psychology and religion and yoga and Alexander Technique were not enough. I needed more help. There was something pathological in me, a rage against women and against authority and against anyone or anything that reminded me of frights from my childhood. I realized I wasn’t always relating to people and places on their own merits, rather I was reacting to what they represented to me.

I started my 12-step program in May of 2011. In December, due to severe financial issues, I stopped driving any unnecessary miles and missed meetings until April of 2012. My behavior was sober. I wasn’t acting out, but I was a dry drunk. I hadn’t worked the program.

So in April I bought the book and in May I started sitting in Starbucks and working the 12 Steps and discussing it with my sponsor.

Step One asked that I admit I was powerless before my tendency to have co-dependent sex and love addicted relationships. I wasn’t at all sure that this was true. I’ve always felt in control. But in hope of getting what I couldn’t imagine, I took action I didn’t believe and admitted my powerlessness before my emotional addictions.

Step Two asked me to accept that God could restore me to sanity. Done!

Except on the rarest of occasions, God has been a distant force in my life. I’ve always believed in Him (except for a couple of years during college), but rarely felt like I was relating to Him. That God loved me meant nothing to me. That I should love God meant nothing to me. That God judges me and rewards and punishes me according to my behavior was obvious to me. God is the judge. I am the judged. That was pretty much the end of my story with God.

Having grown up with God and having almost always led a religious life, it was weird but intriguing to explore a new relationship to God in the program. Sometimes you can hear the same things so many times that they lose all meaning. Now I was hearing about an entirely new route to God and it kept my interest. I found it comforting and accessible. Twelve step prayers, for instance, weren’t in some foreign tongue.

Step Three asked me to make a decision to turn my life over to God. This wasn’t easy. I found it a tad degrading. From a Jewish perspective, God has given man a program, a Torah, and you just do it. Jews don’t talk about turning your life over to God. This was goyisha thinking.

I did like the Third Step prayer: “God, I offer myself to Thee — to build with me and to do with me as Thou wilt. Relieve me of the bondage of self, that I may better do Thy will. Take away my difficulties, that victory over them may bear witness to those I would help of Thy Power, Thy Love, and Thy Way of life. May I do Thy will always!”

By this point, I’m fascinated by the 12 Steps and start checking out various books from the library on them and listening to Youtube lectures on Big Book study.

There wasn’t a lot of work to the first three steps. They were more affirmations. Not a big deal. They were ways of thinking completely contrary to the way I’d gone about living my life, but I was willing to try them out. It didn’t really matter if I didn’t agree with them. It didn’t really matter if they didn’t make sense to me. I was not going to get hung up on labels and definitions.

When I first converted to Judaism in 1993 through a Reform rabbi, I was determined to be like Dennis Prager and to be equally involved with all three denominations (Reform, Conservative and Orthodox). Orthodoxy didn’t make rational sense to me, so I was just going to participate a bit as a sociologist. Then I got to Los Angeles in 1994 and became steadily intrigued by Orthodox Judaism to the point that in 2000, it didn’t matter to me that it didn’t make sense to me, there was just something there that spoke to me. I had to become Orthodox. I had to do an Orthodox conversion. I had to live as an Orthodox Jew because the best people I knew were Orthodox Jews. I was not going to get hung up on labels and definitions.

I started practicing Alexander Technique in 2008 and I had a lot of arguments and objections all the way along but I stuck with it because it just plain worked. I was not going to get hung up on labels and definitions.

I met girls who weren’t my type but they just intrigued me, so I pursued them even though they didn’t make rational sense to me.

I started practicing Kundalini Yoga in January of 2009 and even though much of it didn’t make sense to me, there was just something there that spoke to me and I stayed with it for two years of near-daily practice.

So I’m frighteningly flexible when I think something might improve my life or I just want to participate and have an experience. Things don’t always have to make complete sense to me for me to give them a try. When I was in college, I played with atheistic communism for a couple of years because it just seemed intriguing.

My recovery work really began with Step Four when I made a complete and fearless moral inventory of myself. I started writing out everyone and everything I resented, working my way across four columns (who/what I resented, why I resented them, how they threatened me, and what my role was).

For instance, I resented life for crippling me with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. This destroyed my 20s. I spent most of my time in bed. I never made a full recovery. I never got to finish university. I emerged out of it hobbled. CFS threatened my prestige, my social relationships, my independence. And what role did I play in getting CFS? I drove myself absurdly hard in the months leading up to my collapse. And everything that CFS did to me that was out of my control? I just had to give that up to God.

Perhaps the most difficult part of this step was tackling my resentments against some people who had raised me. Since I was a little kid, I was drilled with the credo that you can’t blame your parents. It just seemed pathetic to blame your parents. Only wankers do that.

The problem was that even though I kept telling myself that you can’t blame your parents, I had all this thinly disguised rage against some of the people who had raised me. It did me no good to keep telling myself, “You can’t blame your parents.” I’d always avoided talking about my childhood in therapy because it seemed like a waste of time. I wanted to concentrate on my decisions in the here and now. As I got older, however, I saw how the choices of others affected my life.

So to truly work this step, I had to start talking about my childhood in therapy and to get clear about how I felt about various decisions made by mom and dad types that affected me. When I had clarity on how I felt about these people, I was able to look at what they had done that I felt had hurt me, how it hurt me, and what role I played in these hurts. Then I was able to begin the difficult work of forgiving them and forgiving myself for not being perfect, for being enslaved to our various spiritual and psychological maladies that adversely affect others.

As I filled out each column, I was able to let go of some resentment. Filling out the second column helped me to see that it was an entire person or institution or idea that I resented, it was a particular manifestation. It became clear to me how threats to my health, my social standing, and my finances aroused my fear and resentment. I felt like my very survival was at stake, like someone was holding my head underwater.

One guy stole about $30,000 of property from me. He threatened my survival and my social standing. I saw that I had played a significant role in this. And then I had to let go of my resentment as I understood that in the stuff that was purely on him, he was acting out of his own spiritual sickness.

I wrote about the three acting schools and five synagogues that had booted me. They hurt my self-esteem and my communal standing. My very survival felt in peril when I lost my social home. I had fewer chances to be successful with women when I became known as a pariah. I wrote out how my own transgressive behavior and writing had brought on my ejections. If there was any part of them that I didn’t deserve, then other people were acting out of their own spiritual sickness. I had to let go of the resentment or I would never get well.

I wrote out about the two great loves of my life. Both had treated me with contempt. That hurt my self-esteem, my sex life, and my social standing. One had repeatedly cheated on me to drive me out of her life. I saw that I had made each woman, a decade apart, my higher power. I had hoped that they would rescue me. I was not capable of a healthy relationship and neither were they (neither has married). We each had our own spiritual sickness. I played the role of the love addict and she played the role of the avoidant.

I wrote about the Seventh-Day Adventist church. When they kicked my dad out of church employment in 1980 when I was 14, it destroyed my social life. We were now outside the Adventist pale and we were exiled into the diaspora. I played no role in my dad getting kicked out. Any mistakes that were made in that inevitable confrontation were attributable to the spiritual sickness of others.

I resented Christianity. I felt like I had spent way too much of my childhood forced to listen to stupid sermons and to read stupid books of apologetics. I hated Christianity. When other kids were playing, I was typing up stupid book reports on Christian classics. My religion separated me from others. It seemed to rob life of everything fun. It retarded my personal development. I never learned to dance and to be normal. I grew up in this weird separatist cult. I had to give up my resentment against this religion, however, or I would never get emotionally sober. I had to halt my resentment replay machine. Any flaws in Christianity were the fault of the spiritual sickness of those who created and perpetuated the faith. I was now an adult and could choose my own religion.

I had many confrontations with teachers and institutions. I reacted badly to authority and in response, authority was constantly hurting me, disciplining me, distancing from me and the like. The actions of my teachers damaged my standing in the community and my ability to make a living. What role did I play in this? Huge! I was constantly acting out and breaking the rules. Anything that was not my fault was due to the spiritual sickness of others. I had to forgive them for that so I could forgive myself for my transgressions.

I’ve had many feuds with fellow writers. Some of these feuds damaged my face, my health and my sleep. They damaged my self-esteem, my social standing and my ability to earn a living. What role did I play in these fights? It varied. I often practiced shoddy journalism, using my blog as a bully pulpit to insult others. I stepped on toes. I was deceitful. I was self-aggrandizing. I was manipulative. I was cruel. I was careless. I would thrust myself forward at other people’s expense. I was all about number one.

The next eight steps follow predictably from here. I had to confess my faults to another person. I had to become ready to have God take away my defects of character. I had to become willing to make amends to those I’d hurt. I made amends. I began taking a moral inventory on a daily basis and when I was wrong, I promptly admitted it. I increased my contact with God, asking for His direction for my life. I tried to be of service to others and to carry this message to other addicts.

As a result of working the 12 Steps, I had a spiritual awakening. I found myself turning to God as a trusted friend. I did less trampling on others as I pursued my goals. I stopped to ask on a regular basis if I was acting selfishly or if this was what God intended for my life. I let go of all historic resentments. I stopped replaying things in my head where every time I thought about some dispute, I became a little more innocent and the other person a little more guilty. For the past six months, I haven’t used my resentment replay machine.

Caught up in the moment, however, I have not been able to avoid the flare-up of petty resentments. When someone cuts me off in traffic or speaks to me rudely or interrupts me when I’m making an important point, I often feel resentment but by working the 12 Steps, I’m able to notice what I’m doing and to let go of the resentment that same day, if not that same hour. I don’t keep feeding my resentments.

I have had less success letting go of my fears. I haven’t worked as hard on my fear inventory as I did on my resentment inventory.

Every day I ask myself two main questions — how free do I want to be? How real do I want God to be in my life?

Posted in Addiction, Personal | Comments Off on STEP FOUR OF THE TWELVE STEPS

My Genius

I was telling my therapist Monday night that I’ve always known, always had a rock solid belief in my own genius when it comes to writing and public speaking. In these two small narrow areas I feel confident that there’s nobody out of my league. This genius of mine justifies my doing almost anything in support of it because the greatest gift I can give to the world are these here blog posts. And what does it matter if they cause some rabbis get their knickers in a twist?

How did I develop this unshakable belief in my own genius? Ever since I was a little boy, my parents told me how my birth mother, when she still carried me in her tummy, developed this conviction that I would grow up to do great things for God.

My parents thought that by telling me this, it would encourage me, but after I became an adult, they concluded the story only encouraged my narcissism. I think that they’d now be happy if I only stopped doing great things for Satan.

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on My Genius

The Dynamics Of Sexual Excitement

In 1999, I joined JDate and met exactly one woman. She was a doctor, just my type. I like powerful competent people. They excite my fantasies of rescue.

We exchanged messages and emails and talked on the phone and finally met one Sunday morning for brunch at the Newsroom on Robertson Blvd.

The conversation flowed. It was so easy. We went for a walk. It was so easy. The hours flew by. Though I wanted to be at my best, I didn’t feel the need to pretend to her (OK, I didn’t talk a lot about my writing on the porn industry, I preferred to concentrate on my lofty chronicling of Dennis Prager). I came home exhilarated.

So many people shunned me for writing on the porn industry. Here was a woman who accepted me for who I am.

Here, at last, I thought, was a woman who was worthy of me. She was beautiful. She was smart. She was accomplished. She was strong. She was busty.

She went home and Googled and found my website lukeford.com and emailed me that she was appalled by some of the content, in particular this vicious rant I published by a reader against Howard Stern and his wife, asking how would the mother of his children tolerate the kind of degradation that Howard dished out to his porn star guests on his radio show?

After I got the good doctor’s email, I looked at the rant and I shuddered. It was disgusting. She was right. I felt slimy. My life was disgusting. It was unworthy of such a woman. I would never have published such content if I had known my date was going to look at it. I would never have published it if anyone I cared about was going to read it.

I started going out with this woman about once a month for two years (splitting the check evenly). She told me early on that after our first date, after she looked me up online, that she told her friends that I was fascinating but that she’d have to wrap me in plastic and freeze-dry me for a year before she got with me to make sure she didn’t catch any STDs.

Ha! I’ve never had an STD. I guess she didn’t believe me.

One night after a movie at the Beverly Center, she led me lingerie shopping. The good doctor was stacked and had a hard time finding sexy bras. She was intrigued with one particular bra and asked me how I liked it and when I said I did, she asked me with a smile if I would buy it for her and showed me the price tag — $200. I said gulped and said sure, if I could see her in it.

I’d definitely pay $200 to have sex with her. Oy vey! Sex with a doctor! I’ve never had sex with a doctor. She could name all the parts that were grinding against each other.

I think that moment was the closest we ever got to crossing the boundary from friends to lovers.

She looked at me for a few seconds and smiled and put the bra back on the rack and led me out of the store and down the safe tidy boulevard of platonic love.

I developed a vigorous email life with this woman. We started arguing early on about the dynamics of sexual excitement. I said that what drove this excitement was the desire to sin, to be dirty and nasty to the object of one’s desire. I was quoting the late psychiatrist Robert Stoller. She vehemently disagreed. She said erotic excitement was the product of mutual love and respect.

Harumph! When I think about my mutual love and respect for a woman, it does nothing for me erotically. When I want to get nasty with her, that lights my rocket.

Despite our hot and heavy emails (all theory, nothing about what we’d like to do to each other), we never did get sexual together. We never kissed. We never held hands. We just went to dinners and movies and talked. Because her job required her complete attention, she had me plan everything we did. Fine with me. I kept taking her to the same vegetarian restaurant — Real Food Daily on La Cienega Blvd.

In 2000, our email arguments upped in intensity. Healthcare for women has always been a passion for me. I suggested that the good doctor offer free pap smears in exchange for patients consenting to streaming everything on a paid feed over the internet. She was not impressed with this suggestion.

I made some disparaging remark about the play The Vagina Monologues (which I had not seen, only read about) and my date responded that I hated vaginas. I didn’t see how my contempt for Eve Ensler’s production had anything to do with how I felt about women’s private parts, but that kind of hysterical lack of logic is pretty bloody typical for a woman, isn’t it?

One night in early 2001, we went to the Marquis DeSade movie Quills. I have a weak stomach for violence and as the movie reached its climax, I had to look away. It was too much. And I remember my date grabbing my face, forcing my eyes open, poking me in the chest, and saying, “Look at this. This is what you like.”

No! It was not what I like. When I want to hurt the object of my affection, I want to do it through fantasy and play like tickling and biting and scratching and spanking, never through real violence. Yes, all good sex has an element of violence, but there should be no damage. I’m a gentle nurturing boyfriend. Ask all my ex-girlfriends. I always ask for permission. I dole out safe words. I say please and thank you. I pay obeisance to the mutual love and respect thing. I talk about how what we’re doing makes me feel closer. I say things gently, as in, I’m terribly sorry but would you mind taking your dentures out before you do that?

Even though the good doctor later apologized, we didn’t go out again.

I hate how people can’t hear what I was saying. They can only hear what it represents to them, what it evokes for them. The incentives to lie are powerful, particularly for a man with a woman he wants. Yes, my dear, it is love that is the most erotic thing for me, and I only ever desire you, never anyone else. Don’t even look at others. Now let us join together and experience our mutual love and respect.

I want to live in truth. I want to speak the truth. I don’t want to relay banalities and lies just to get ahead. I’m not a careerist. I don’t want to sacrifice my integrity to get ahead. I want to call ’em as I see ’em.

I relayed it all to my therapist, read to her some of our emails, and my therp said my date must have a messed up relationship with her father and with men in general.

And I gave up on the good doctor, though not, I’m afraid, before she gave up on me.

I’m a little hazy on my chronology here, but after about two years of our monthly dinners, and I fear that this might have been after the Quills debacle, I asked her via email if she wanted to go out more often. She very politely asked for 24 hours to think about it and then got back to me to say no.

I appreciated that she took that time to think. It meant I was worth considering. A swift “no” would’ve stung.

A few weeks later, she told me that she was thinking about dating a good friend, but feared losing the friendship if things didn’t work out.

“Men and women can’t be friends,” I said to her. “Go ahead and date him. At worst, you will only lose something that can’t last anyway.”

They married quickly and just before Rosh Hashanah 2001, I was a dinner guest at their Shabbat table. It didn’t hurt that bad. I was never in her league.

We’d had a good run. She’d been very tolerant. I was such a pariah in those days, but for two years she gave me monthly tastes of happiness.

At our final Shabbat dinner, she congratulated me on my recent two-page profile in The Jerusalem Report, and all I remembered was how, perhaps it was that very night or perhaps it was months before, she called me “the great under-achiever”, or perhaps she said I was “the great f***-up.”

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on The Dynamics Of Sexual Excitement

Should Ordinary Jews Study Talmud?

Historian Marc B. Shapiro writes:

In all the discussions recently about the success of Daf Yomi, I didn’t see anyone note that one of the reasons this success is so surprising is that the whole notion of Daf Yomi goes against what for many years was the outlook of the rabbinic elite. The Shakh, Yoreh Deah 246:5, quoting the Derishah, states that laypeople should not only study Talmud but also halakhah, which he thinks should be their major focus as practical halakhah is שורש ועיקר לתורתינו. It is not hard to understand the point that since a layperson’s time is limited, he will get more out of his learning by focusing on practical material. If, for example, one has an hour a day to learn, what makes more sense: to go through hilkhot Shabbat or to study Talmud? While people today prefer Talmud, the Shakh prefers halakhah, and I don’t know of any rabbinic figures in years past who disagreed with the Shakh. This Shakh is also mentioned in the introduction to the Mishnah Berurah. While it is obvious that one who has time to learn both Talmud and practical halakhah is in the ideal circumstance, how did we get to the situation where those whose time is limited are now encouraged to focus on Talmud? The credit (or blame, depending on your outlook) for this development can, I think, be laid at Artscroll’s door, for Artscroll made learning Talmud exciting for the masses, in a way that halakhah is not, and maybe can never be.

Daf Yomi is so revolutionary precisely due to its democratic ethos, that everyone is welcome to study that which used to be the preserve of only the elites. Much like American universities opened up higher learning to the masses, and created a situation where for the first time in history texts such as Plato and Aristotle were now taught (or spoon-fed) to all, so too, for he first time in history, Daf Yomi allowed Talmud to become a product of mass consumption.

Posted in Marc B. Shapiro, Talmud | Comments Off on Should Ordinary Jews Study Talmud?