September 11, 2015 MORE THAN 90 PERCENT OF MIDDLE EASTERN REFUGEES ON FOOD STAMPS Luke Ford No sacred cows.

MORE THAN 90 PERCENT OF MIDDLE EASTERN REFUGEES ON FOOD STAMPS

Posted on September 11, 2015 by Luke Ford

Lisa Schiffren writes on FB: “Why do we want more uneducated, deeply hostile dependents? We have enough troubles of our own, an economy that doesn’t create jobs, and our 30 million hispanic illegals — who may be unproductive, but don’t actually want to kill us and destroy our culture because their God tells them to. Bringing in 10,000 Syrians of indeterminate background is suicidal. Send them to Saudi Arabia. Or Kuwait, Qatar or Oman.”

Heshy Fried posts: “Haven’t really formulated an opinion on the Syrian refuge thing, but the comments on the Jewish news sites all make me think of that time when America didn’t want to take Jewish refuges during the holocaust. “I sure as hell don’t want em coming here” was probably the same thing people said in the 40s about the Jews.”

Breitbart: More than 90 percent of recent refugees from Middle Eastern nations are on food stamps and nearly 70 percent receive cash assistance, according to government data.

According to Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) data highlighted by the immigration subcommittee staff of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL)80%
— chairman of the Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest — in FY 2013, 91.4 percent of Middle Eastern refugees (accepted to the U.S. between 2008-2013) received food stamps, 73.1 percent were on Medicaid or Refugee Medical Assistance and 68.3 percent were on cash welfare.

Middle Eastern refugees used a number of other assistance programs at slightly lower rates. For example, 36.7 percent received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), 32.1 percent received Supplemental Security Income (SSI), 19.7 percent lived in public housing, 17.3 percent were on General Assistance (GA), and 10.9 percent received Refugee Cash Assistance (RCA).

The high welfare rates among Middle Eastern refugees comes as the Obama administration considers increasing the number of refugees — who are immediately eligible for public benefits — to the U.S., particularly Syrian refugees.

ORR defines refugees and asylees from the “Middle East” as being from Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, and Yemen.

Sessions’ staff notes that that from FY 2008 to FY 2013 the U.S. admitted 115,617 refugees from the Middle East and granted another 10,026 asylum. Additionally the U.S. granted green cards to 308,805 immigrants from those Middle Eastern countries identified by ORR as refugee nations, making them Lawful Permanent Residents (LPRs) eligible to apply for citizenship in five years and petition to have family members come to the U.S.

As of 2013, Sessions’ staff notes, the top ten countries for refugee admission to the U.S. were Iraq, Burma, Bhutan, Somalia, Cuba, Iran, Congo, Sudan, Eritrea, and Ethiopia.

“More broadly, concerning all immigration, the Migration Policy Institute notes that the U.S. has taken in ‘about 20 percent of the world’s international migrants, even as it represents less than 5 percent of the global population,’ and that 1 in 4 U.S. residents is now either an immigrant or born to immigrant parents,” Sessions staff highlights, noting that the Census is projecting that another 14 million immigrants will come to the U.S. by 2025.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off

The Israeli Mind

Posted on September 11, 2015 by Luke Ford

Alon Gratch writes March 1, 2015:

In the aftermath of World War II, Israeli foreign policy rested on the idea that if you want to make history, you must forget history. This idea allowed the government to negotiate with Germany over diplomatic relations and financial restitution on the basis of self-interest rather than emotions. It resulted in a tremendous economic growth and greater security for the fledgling state.

Holocaust privatization

But then came the Adolf Eichmann trial of 1961, bringing home to all Israelis the horrific personal stories of the survivors and ushering in what historian Hanna Yablonka called “the privatization of the Holocaust.” Starting then, Israel gradually embraced the opposite idea, the notion that those who are unwilling to remember history are doomed to repeat it, as the organizing principle of its foreign policy.

This also led to greater prosperity and security for Israel.

But whereas the earlier philosophy was based on Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion’s practical vision and the cold calculus of a few professional policymakers, the latter was based on a set of powerful emotions experienced by the whole nation. Due to the language barrier and the general intensity and vitality of life in Israel, foreign observers often fail to grasp the extent to which the trauma of the Holocaust has penetrated every aspect of Israeli life.

As a result of decades of intensive educational programs, the Holocaust has become the central building block of the national identity of many Israelis. A 1992 study among university students studying to become teachers found that close to 80% identified with the statement, “We are all Holocaust survivors.” And in present-day Israel, hardly a day goes by without some mention of Holocaust in the media.

Underlying this national preoccupation are the twin emotions of anxiety and rage, along with the refusal or inability to tolerate any feelings of helplessness. “Never again will Jews go like lambs to the slaughter” is a phrase inculcated in the mind of every Israeli child.

Psychological burden

More than anything else, it is this psychological burden that will determine Israeli reaction to the West’s negotiations with Iran.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off

WHY ISRAEL’S ELECTIONS WERE REALLY ABOUT 1967

Posted on September 11, 2015 by Luke Ford

Alon Gratch writes March 31, 2015:

At my son’s bar mitzvah, which took place a few years ago at a Conservative synagogue outside New York City, the rabbi delivered a sermon on the Six Day War, declaring it “Israel’s finest hour.” As he spoke, my brother, an Israeli businessman in his fifties, stood up and yelled, “Rabbi, I object to these statements.”

As the rabbi tried to talk him down, my wife—a gracious, well-mannered American—turned to my brother and said, “If you don’t stop this I’m going to kill you!”

Without missing a beat, he responded, “Some causes are worth dying for.”

Posted in Israel | Comments Off

Author, psychologist delves inside ‘The Israeli Mind’

Posted on September 11, 2015 by Luke Ford

Jonathan Kirsch writes:

He describes how he witnessed a lighthearted conversation in a Jerusalem coffee shop between a graduate student and a young teacher about classroom cheating. “Well, if I caught a student cheating, I wouldn’t view it as a negative,” the teacher said. “I would see it as an indication that he wants to succeed.” Gratch concludes: “The Israeli mind’s failures at empathy, its lack of regard for reality, and its relentless drive for success, all produce a predilection for cutting corners, bluffing, and lying.”
The values and behaviors that make up what Gratch calls the Israeli national character can be seen as a form of psychological self-defense. “Israeli psychologists … have noted that everyday belligerence in Israeli society is rooted in unconscious anxiety,” he writes.

I think you can see the Israeli mind as a distillation of the Jewish mind.

Rabbi Robert Orkand writes:

Israelis are oppositional and quick to say no, Gratch says, which, as a reaction to danger, serves as a survival mechanism. It is rooted in the Jewish Diaspora experience, and it continues to operate in an independent Jewish state, even though it is no longer essential and even counterproductive.
This psychological defense mechanism, Gratch says, is largely responsible for Israel’s success, but “to the extent that the oppositional character of the Israeli mind drives or shapes Israeli actions, reactions, or policies, it is imperative for Israel’s as well as the world’s security, that we understand it and learn how to deal with it.”
…Despite their achievements, Israelis have not been able to fully free themselves from what Gratch calls “the ideology of affliction.” In the Israeli mind, he maintains, ingrained feelings of insecurity clash with the reality of Israel being the most powerful and advanced country in the region.
…Annihilation anxiety, combined with hyper-masculinity and a narrative of self-sacrifice, Gratch says, all clash with the nation’s aspiration for normalcy or even greatness.

Kirkus Reviews:

On one hand, the Jews’ self-identity as the chosen people allowed them a self-aggrandizing role in history; on the other hand, their “outsized” accomplishments in all fields over the ages have resulted from a “compensatory drive” to overcome their sense of insignificance. Another facet of Israeli narcissism, Gratch notes, is the lack of empathy, revealed in the inability to understand and experience the plight of their neighbors, the Palestinians. More troubling than the Israeli disrespect for authority and penchant for cutting corners is the deeply internalized sense of victimization that manifests in paranoia and defensiveness—a frightening mix vis-à-vis the Iran nuclear crisis and conflict with the Palestinians.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Israel, Jews | Comments Off

Danielle Berrin: Germany’s moral courage

Posted on September 11, 2015 by Luke Ford

Danielle Berrin writes:

While the rest of Europe fretted over what to do about a crisis that is being called “the largest wave of emigration since World War II,” Germany, led by its courageous and moral Chancellor Angela Merkel, signaled its willingness to heed the call of millions of desperate refugees, many of whom have been rendered stateless by the war in Syria and other Middle East crises.
While the United States has sat idly by, draped in its aggrandizing values of justice and liberty for all, its political passivity partly responsible for the refugee crisis to begin with, Germany steps forward with leadership and humanity.
While the Gulf States of Qatar, Kuwait, Saudia Arabia and the United Arab Emirates defend themselves against charges of apathy and indifference, Germany opens its arms. “You can’t welcome people who come from a different atmosphere, from a different place, who suffer from psychological problems, from trauma, and enter them into societies,” Kuwaiti commentator Fahad Al-Shelaimi, chairman of the Gulf Forum for Peace and Security, said last March during a televised address on France24’s Arabic channel.
The Gulf States – and the United States – have a few things in common: Both have opened their checkbooks (Saudi Arabia: $18.4 million; Kuwait: $304 million; U.S.: $1.1 billion), while refusing to open their borders. Instead Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan, whose per capita incomes are but a fraction of those in the Gulf States, have absorbed the largest number of refugees (Turkey: 2 million; Lebanon: 1.2 million; Jordan: 630,000). The U.S. has agreed to a paltry 1,500.
So far, only Germany, and her neighboring Austria, have risked their own stability and security to absorb these fleeing refugees, with Germany expecting to receive 800,000 this year alone.
The country’s compassion moved the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees to praise Germany, Austria and “civil society” itself for their “remarkable” response to the crisis. “This is political leadership based on humanitarian values,” said a UNHCR statement issued on Sept. 5. Newsweek declared Germany’s Chancellor Merkel “Europe’s Conscience.”

The comments on the article are funny:

* The children of these “migrants” will not assimilate. They will become Islamist fanatics.

* And, payback for the 6 million Jews. Danielle, I suggest that your quote from our rosh hashana prayer, i.e. “haras” (ashkenazic pronunciation) which means “pregnant”, if spelled with a “samech”(last letter of the word) instead of a “tav” would mean “destruction”. It’s payback time.

* There are so many young men among the refugees. They should be organized into military units, trained and certainly in part commanded by western cadre to return home and fight for their country. Those who won’t take up arms in their own defense do not deserve sanctuary.

* Europe will rue the day that they allowed these Muslim savages into their country. Even now you don’t dare publish a cartoon of their precious Mohamed without an attempt on your life . You stupid fools; your not practicing humanity, your embracing cold hard suicide. Europeans will die from what you are doing today. Tomorrow SHARIA LAW!!!

Posted in Germany, Immigration, Islam | Comments Off

JJ: Historian Timothy Snyder presents a provocative, new take on the Holocaust

Posted on September 11, 2015 by Luke Ford

Danielle Berrin conducts this interview:

Yale historian Timothy Snyder is among the world’s leading scholars of Eastern Europe. Educated at Oxford, he is the author of five award-winning books, including the acclaimed “Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin,” about Nazi and Soviet mass killings in the 20th century. The book received the Leipzig Prize for European Understanding, the Ralph Waldo Emerson Award in the Humanities and has been translated into more than 20 languages. Snyder’s latest work, “Black Earth: The Holocaust as History and Warning,” explores the events, ideology and political machinery that made mass extermination possible.

DB: What has the world most misunderstood or not understood well enough about Hitler and his thinking?

TS: Hitler’s anti-Semitism is not really about Jews so much as it is about making sense of the world. So when we say that he’s an anti-Semite, that’s true, of course, but in some sense it’s not sufficient. He placed the responsibility on the Jews for all ideas of ethics, all ideas of science, anything that got in the way of making the world the bloody, competitive place that he thought it always was and should be in the future. His anti-Semitism is the matter of a complete worldview; he sees the world as a terrain with finite resources and life as a bloody, racial competition for those resources. He was a kind of anarchic thinker; he wasn’t concerned with making the German state big, strong, precise, bureaucratic and administrative — all these stereotypes we have in our heads — his view is that the state is secondary; the race is what matters.

DB: How was Hitler able to sell this primitive race ideology — that basically ascribed all of humanity to a dog-eat-dog competition for resources — to a modern, civilized nation such as Germany? Was it his political genius or a more deeply rooted malaise in German society?

TS: Hitler was a very gifted politician. He was good at not revealing the extremity of his views when it wasn’t necessary to do so; it’s all there in the book [“Mein Kampf”], but in his public speeches, he would often be much less radical. Part of his idea is that German patriotism is a force that one has to manipulate in order to [compel] the Germans into the racial war. The second thing is, although Germany in the 1930s was a modern society, there was a very real and legitimate concern about food supplies. The country had been blockaded during the first world war, suffered during the Great Depression and was dependent upon international freight and food. [So] it’s a scenario where a functioning state has a population which is used to a certain standard of living and which is afraid of losing it.

DB: You claim that the breakdown of states and institutions is what, on a practical level, enabled the mass extermination of Jews. Does that mean part of the answer is to shore up the nation-state system? Because in many parts of the world today, the nation-state is under attack.

TS: If we look at it statistically, we see that in places where the state was destroyed, Jews had a 1 in 20 chance of surviving. In places where the state wasn’t destroyed, it was about 1 in 2. Whenever you wipe out states, it is always ethnic minorities who end up getting treated the worst. I come to the conclusion that it’s important that states — even imperfect states — stand, because the process of destruction is harmful for everyone, but especially for minorities.

DB: Any thoughts on why Jews, in particular, are subjected to history’s hatreds and persecutions repeatedly?

TS: The Jewish international conspiracy, although it is ridiculous as a factual matter, is a way of making a globalized world make sense. You have to think in planetary terms. Hitler’s anti-Semitism is not so much about the Jews in Germany, because there aren’t that many Jews in Germany — and they’re basically all assimilated — it’s about turning these individuals into a symbol of a world plot that one has to fight against. And that is characteristic of certain moments in world history.

DB: The Soviet Union plays an ambivalent role in the book. On the one hand, you write that the USSR “taught” the Nazis a lot about mass murder. But, on the other hand, the Red Army ultimately did more than any other force to stop them. How should we understand its role?

TS: …Before the war, the Soviets had a policy of eliminating anti-Semitism and all other forms of ethnic discrimination. [But] when Germany actually invades the Soviet Union, it turns out that Soviet citizens are willing to collaborate in large enough numbers that the Holocaust can take place as a major shooting campaign [there]. Then it turns out that the major force resisting Hitler is the Red Army, and that [it] actually wins the war in large measure. It’s complicated.

….One thing that I would like to get across is that even the most horrible events do have explanations that we can understand. And it’s not always comfortable for us to understand, because in order to understand, we have to see how we’re not so far away from the people in question. For me, it’s very important that we have a sense in human history how these things arise, because without that sense, we’re going to be vulnerable in the future.

…What the 1930s show is that a developed, competent, modern, educated society can get into a situation where worries about standards of living can justify horrifying bloodshed. And we are now drifting toward a world where that kind of thing can very well become likely again, as [we see] poor societies becoming richer societies. The second trend is the state. Everyone seems to take the state for granted. In 2003, we casually did away with the Iraqi state, without really having anything to replace it with, and look how wonderful things are now. And Russia is nihilistically casual with the Ukrainian state, thinking it’s not really a real place. And if you look at our political dialogue in the U.S., there isn’t very much respect for the state either. And [all this] worries me. There is an atmosphere of dread, wherever you go almost — whether it’s Beijing or Tokyo or Kiev or Moscow or Berlin — there is this sense that things are making a turn in the wrong direction.

Posted in Adolf Hitler, Anti-Semitism, Holocaust | Comments Off

The Myth Of Black Criminality?

Posted on September 11, 2015 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* West Virginia is the 2nd poorest state in the nation by median income. It ranks 32nd in homicide rate (i.e. only 18 states are safer). It’s homicide rate of 3.0 per 100,000 is only barely above that of Norway (2.2). 3.5% of West Virginia’s population is black.

Maryland is the richest state in the nation by median income. It has the 3rd highest murder rate in the nation. It’s homicide rate of 7.3 per 100,000 ranks it alongside countries like Pakistan (7.7) and Chad (7.3). Maryland has 3rd highest percentage of blacks in the nation at 29.4%.

* I wish White privilege really did exist in real life. I am talking about the kind of White privilege seen in the SNL parody video featuring Eddie Murphy in White face. I wish random White people on the streets and in banks would just come up to me to hand me free money and free stuff in general simply because we are of the same race. I wish random attractive White women on public buses would sit on my lap and flirt with me simply because I am White.

* Attacking TNC is like picking on a special needs kid. The real question is why did the Atlantic hire him and why do white Liberals love him so much. From a conservative perspective, his dumbness is actually useful. In fact, a bunch of racist liberals – resentful that they had to give a job to a affirmative action black – couldn’t have picked a worse black spokesman.

* Frankly, I don’t care very much about what the “premiere” American intellectual Ta-Nehisi Coates thinks about anything. Everyone knows he is a joke.

I do care very much what Jeffrey Goldberg and Yoni Appelbaum who “oversee” TNC think. Jeffrey and Yoni are extremely intelligent and have incredible political influence. TNC is just a sock puppet that will be tossed to the side once he utters the word “Palestine” in the presence of his financial benefactors.

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off

Germany Abolishes Itself

Posted on September 11, 2015 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* “Syria’s richer Gulf neighbours have been accused of not doing their fair share in the humanitarian crisis, with Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman and the UAE also keeping their doors firmly shut to asylum-seekers.”

Gulf Arabs are a lot more street smart and have a lot more common sense than Northwest Europeans. Northwest Europeans like the Swedes and the Germans have about as much street smarts as a SWPL person who goes midnight jogging in the streets of Detroit.

Swedes and Germans live in such sheltered little worlds. But their utopia is going to come crashing down hard. They have no clue what they have gotten themselves into.

* How abundantly clear do the Arabs have to be? If it isn’t obvious to our elites by now that they are being had, then a) they are too stupid to be in control, or b) they really are hostile and intend to destroy us. In either case they must go, and people truly concerned about Western Civilization need to be running the show.

* Germany voted for Merkel, but they didn’t vote at all for mass immigration. Much of regular countryside Germans are absolutely horrified.

Those that resist this are being demonized.

England clearly voted against mass non-white immigration. The ethnic French and Italians are too. Many Europeans are horrified. Hungary is obviously doing what they can to resist. Their avenues of resisted are being fought and limited.

In the 20th century, US whites voted passionately for “school choice” which meant voluntary segregation and other segregation measures. The popular vote was overturned on constitutional grounds. Those that didn’t smile widely enough were vilified.

* Well, at least Germany will be culturally enriched with radical and fundamentalist Wahabism! Perhaps, Merkel should import some radical Shiites to further the enrichment!

* Mosques built overseas by the Saudis serve as Wahabi magnets, drawing Muslims to their version of Islamic fundamentalism through the obligation of gratitude to their benefactors. There might appear to be no strings attached, but psychological and cultural strings there are, nevertheless.

Many mosques in the U.S. built for black muslims breaking with the Nation of Islam were built by the Saudis, or so I have heard. Given that the Saudis have been among those financing the ISIS mess in Syria, which has led to many of the ‘refugees’ swarming to Europe, offering to fund mosques in Europe is the second part of the one-two punch.

I’d suggest that Germany turn down the offer of Saudi-built mosques. Let the migrants raise funds to build their own, if they wants mosques. In Islam, there is nothing wrong with saying one’s prayers at home. Mosques tend to serve as centers for extremist Imams to preach extremism to the faithful in languages that the host countries can’t understand. Not ideal.

* Can we sign you and your family up to host five or ten enterprising young arab men who think that you are a pig and that your wife and daughters are whores? I knew we could count on you.

* Is Islam really and truly worse than the new secular religion of ‘egalitarianism’ ie all that stinky identity politics, feminista tyranny, black grievance domination, LBGT histrionics, AA, New Labour, the Democrat Party, immigrationism, open borders etc etc, that seems to be the dominant cult in the modern west, and which is being pushed by some very aggressive American forces?

At least Islam is a manly religion.

* I admire the Saudis for this. They aren’t confused about whether they are on their own side or not.

* I don’t know the situation in Germany, but in the US both parties for quite some time have not given us a true choice on immigration. They either ignore the issue or push amnesty, expanded work visas, etc. There is never discussion about going back to something like the immigration levels of 1924. There is never discussion about whether demographic change is anything except an unqualified good.

Granted there has been a Pat Buchanan or Tom Tancredo here or there. But they didn’t have the financial backing to weather the storm of media attacks that were frequently coordinated by party elders. And they were easily branded as crackpots because the narrative was arrayed against them, and the average Joe on the street got all their information about them through the media’s lens.

But now with Trump, assuming he doesn’t pull a Ross Perot, Americans have a chance to show that reducing immigration is an important issue to them. Since Trump is rich, he needs no financial backing. Since Trump is famous, the media can’t create a negative narrative on him because his skeletons have already been emptied from the closet. Despite the rest of the GOP wanting to ignore immigration or push amnesty, Trump has shown already that the GOP base is interested in slowing it down. I hope he stays in long enough for the lion’s share of this nation, not just the GOP base, to express this view too.

Posted in Germany, Immigration, Islam, Sweden | Comments Off

Steve Sailer: How’d the Last German Experiment with Importing Muslim Workers Turn Out?

Posted on September 11, 2015 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Universities and open borders crowd argue that mass immigration is supposed to deliver an economic boon and reduce crime. But we often see the opposite. The open borders types don’t even believe they are telling the truth, they know they are being dishonest, they are just so committed to arguing and winning that the ends justify the means.

The immigrant banlieues in France are very high crime, poverty stricken, social service sponges. They were supposed to reduce crime and provide economic benefit and seem to do the exact opposite. Will the open borders crowd admit that this isn’t working.

US is supposed to be the success story of multi-racial integration, but it really doesn’t feel that way.

* It takes a lot of work to shift the zietgeist. The guys causing the problems love it when you can try something without the modern social mob at your back. You are isolated, ridiculed, and squashed like a grape. Obviously just another crazy fool. Nothing to see here.

An import part of the solution is to actually prove your case. To illustrate your point. To show, not tell. And not just once, but every time. Every time you hear some PC BS, call them on it. Show the whole story. Every time you see something idiotic, point it out. Dwell on it. Rub everyone’s collective faces in it. When they attempt to shout you down, just keep on doing it. Don’t even bother addressing them. Address the rest of the world. Every time one of their thought-leaders makes happy-happy silly-silly, remind everyone that there’s more to the world than the sound bite. Tell the back story. Yeah, a lot won’t get it. But some will. And all this build up over time. Especially today, when everything lives forever on computers.

Slow, steady, smooth. A lot of lies have to be killed first.

* Sailer is wildly entertaining, he’s anything but boring, he’s extremely insightful, he has built a devoted following, but he’s just a fringe writer. He doesn’t have any influence beyond that.

Your action ideas are agitate for policy.

My favorite action ideas:

– Humor and entertainment. No one listens to angry miserable people no matter how strong their logical arguments are. People listen to those that entertain.

– Genetics. Develop better understanding of human genetics and what traits/genes we want and which we don’t. We often think that politicians change the world, but often major structural social changes come from technology. Better human genetics understanding would help this crowd’s goals.

* I think you underestimate the hold that politically correct thinking and the religion of diversity has on the West. Many of the opinions expressed on iSteve are Orwellian Thoughtcrimes against the prevailing approved beliefs in the infinite malleability of all peoples, the notion that freedom requires absolute uniformity and the jest that nothing really important happened prior to today.

Steve and others provide a space where ideas that are considered perfectly reasonable in most of the world but are often considered literally unthinkable in the West can be raised. Liberalism’s quasi-religious death-grip (cf. James Burnham) cannot be shaken off until more people realize that its shibboleths are chimera. The first thing step towards release is to realize that liberal rule is neither inevitable nor normative.

* Before the events of this summer there were less than 1/10 as many Arabs in Germany compared to Turks. Yet in criminal gangs, street crime etc. there are more Arabs than Turks. Also the Hip Hop culture is dominated by Arabs, which shows that Arabs are seen as the toughest. Arabs are clearly the most problematic group in Germany. Now that Arabs rise from a tiny minority to a substantial fraction of the population funny times are coming

Posted in Germany, Immigration | Comments Off

Steve Sailer: FBI: Top Ten Most Wanted of America’s White Collar Criminals Not Too White American

Posted on September 11, 2015 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Immigrants are doing the white collar crimes that Americans are simply too lazy to do anymore. Even the Black guy on that list has a Nigerian or other West African sounding name and not a homegrown African American name like Jamal Andre Jackson.

* Russians have been slandered a long time by New York media especially. New York media are quick to point out the knavery of Russian immigrants when indicted for crime but stop short of noting that most Russian criminals are in fact Jewish.

* Violent criminals or white collar criminals? Because there is no way most violent Russian thugs are Jewish. Jews are not responsible for why Russia has the highest per capita murder rate in all of Europe. Russian Gentiles as a group have always been a very violent people. Also bat shit crazy Chechen Muslims help drive up the murder rate in Russia.

If Jews were the main ones responsible for violent street crimes in Russia, than Israel would have a similar per capita murder as Russia but they don’t. The per capita murder rate in Israel is way closer to Western European levels than they are to Slavic Russian levels.

Russian Gentiles are not as law abiding as Vermont and North Dakota Whites for example, that’s just a fact.

Posted in Crime | Comments Off